No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Willows Of Presbyterian Senior

1215 Hulton Road, Oakmont, PA 15139 · Non profit - Corporation · 193 certified beds · (412) 828-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$132,149 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $132,149 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1215 Hulton Rd Ste W · (412) 784-7620 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.7 mi
324 Hulton Rd · (412) 826-8303 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
850 Allegheny River Blvd · (412) 492-4339 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1499 Pennsylvania Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1261 Pennsylvania Ave · (412) 828-9323

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.6%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.3%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.2%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.4%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.2%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.241.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.5%CMS range 41.2–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.4–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
41.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 193 beds and averages 170.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-02)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for one of 35 residents (Resident R1) identified as high risk for wandering. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Elopement Process dated August 2024, indicated an elopement assessment is completed upon admission, quarterly, annually, and if a resident actively attempts to elope. If they score a one or above on the elopement risk assessment an elopement device (alarm to alert staff of a resident going beyond a safe area), should be placed. Review of the facility policy Skilled Nursing- Elopement dated August 2024, indicated staff shall investigate and report all cases of missing residents. Staff shall promptly report any resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility submitted documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident was free from neglect by not ensuring adequate supervision and assistance for transfers, which resulted in actual harm of a head contusion (bruise) for one of four residents (Resident R28), and actual harm of a skin tear for two of four residents (Residents R117 and R134), and failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for an unknown skin condition injury for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R134).Findings include:Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing - Abuse dated August 2025, indicated neglect is defined as the failure of the community, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing - Lifting and Transferring Residents dated August 2025, indicated it is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings include: Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing - Lifting and Transferring Residents dated August 2025, indicated it is the policy to lift/transfer residents as safely as possible. All residents requiring assistance with transfer will be transferred and/or lifted using mechanical device unless otherwise indicated by a physician order, or unless the resident is able to bear weight on his/her own. Mechanical lifts are done by 2 nursing/therapy personnel.Review of the facility policy Unexplained Injuries dated August 2025, indicated an investigation of all unexplained injuries (including bruises, abrasions, and injuries of unknown source) will be conducted by an individual to ensure that the safety of our residents has not been jeopardized.Review of the facility policy Investigation of Incidents dated August 2025, indicated it is the policy of the facility to conduct a thorough and timely investigation of incidents and accidents.Review of facility Nurse Aide (NA) job description indicated the NA will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, which resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by a patella (knee) fracture, for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Skilled Nursing - Investigation of incidents update August 2024, indicated the purpose is to establish guidelines for investigations of incidents and accidents to determine the root cause of the event and to identify systemic changes and measures needed to prevent future incidents. The facility will conduct a thorough and timely investigation of incidents and accidents. If the accident/incident is related to resident care, in order to decide whether or not to substantiate abuse/neglect, begin by establishing the facts of the situation. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to facility 4/7/2020. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the Main Kitchen which created the potential for cross contamination. (Main Kitchen)Findings include: During an observation on 9/22/25, at 9:30 a.m. it was revealed the ice machines in the main kitchen contained a brown substance inside the machine. During an interview on 9/22/25, at 9:50 am the Dietary Director E8 confirmed the brown substance in the ice machine and could not verify the last time it was sanitized creating the potential for cross contamination. 28 Pa Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information for five of seven residents (Resident R38, R43, R44, R98, and R159), and failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of nine medication carts (Third Floor West/Northwest Medication Cart).Findings include:Review of facility policy HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) -Privacy dated August 2025, indicated facility is dedicated to protecting the privacy of personal health information and is committed to maintaining confidentiality. During a tour and observation on 9/29/25, at 10:19 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 the following sign was observed hanging on the wall in Resident R44's room:- Please help resident with her meals- My showers are Monday and Fridays 7-3- Hoyer lift at all times until further noticeDuring a tour and observation on 9/29/25, at 10:27 a.m. with LPN Employee E4 the following signs were observed hanging on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the placement of a bed against the wall as a possible restraint, the use of bolsters (a long, thick cushion) on a bed as a possible restraint, failed to obtain a physicians order, failed to develop a person-centered plan of care for the use of physical restraints, and failed to provide ongoing re-evaluation of the need for physical restraints for three of three residents reviewed (Residents R6, R9, and R18).Findings include:Review of facility policy Physical Restraints dated August 2025, indicated physical restraint refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints may include but are not limited to placing a chair or bed close enough to a wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for five of five residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R7, R9, R10, R14 and R17).Findings include:Review of the facilties Transfer and Discharge policy dated August 2025, indicated each resident to remain in the community and not transfer or discharge the resident except in limited situations. Orientation for transfer or discharge must be provided and documented to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs)dated 8/14/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anemia (too little iron in the blood), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in the blood).Review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for four of seven residents (Residents R16, R18, R47, and R80).Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 calendar days following admission (admission date plus 13 calendar days), and an annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) plus 14 calendar days.Resident R16 had an admission date of 8/27/25, with an MDS completion date of 9/9/25. The MDS was signed off as completed 9/10/25, one day after the due date.Resident R18 had an annual ARD of 6/6/26, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for three of seven residents (Residents R19, R77, and R137).Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD).Resident R19 had a quarterly ARD of 6/28/25, and was due to be completed 7/12/25. The MDS was signed as completed on 7/15/25, three days after the due date.Resident R77 had a quarterly ARD of 6/24/25, and was due to be completed 7/8/25. The MDS was signed as completed on 7/10/25, two days after the due date.Resident R137 had a quarterly ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for five of five residents (Residents R1, R10, R98, R126, and R134).Findings include:Review of facility policy Oxygen Administration dated August 2025, indicated to change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. Change humidifier bottle when empty or weekly. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Change nebulizer (a machine that delivers respiratory medication to person) tubing every week or as needed if they become contaminated. Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/13/25, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor resident's personal refrigerators to ensure that food is properly stored and maintained for six of seven residents (Resident R43, R44, R57, R144, R150, and R159), and failed to maintain proper infection control practices related to the care of indwelling urinary catheters (tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine) for one of three residents (Resident R8). Findings include:Review of facility policy Infection Control - Infection Prevention and Control Program, most recently reviewed August 2025, indicated that this community has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines.The designated Infection Preventionist is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine it was safe to self-administer medications for two of seven residents (Resident R45 and R166).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medications dated August 2025, indicated residents in the facility who wish to self-administer their medications may do so if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate. The staff and practitioner will document residents who are potentially capable of self-administering medications. The resident is asked to complete a bedside record indication of administration of the medication. Self-administered medications must be stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of resident R45's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for one of five residents (Resident R19).Findings include:Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/19/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, arthritis (inflammation of one or more joints, causing pain and stiffness), and osteoporosis (condition when the bones become brittle and fragile).During an observation on 9/29/25, at 9:43 a.m. Resident R19 was sitting in a recliner in their room. The call bell was placed on Resident R19's bed, under the linens, out of the resident's reach.During an interview on 9/29/25, at 9:50 a.m. Registered Nurse Employee E1 confirmed Resident R19's call bell was not accessible and unavailable for use to the resident and that the facility failed to accommodate Resident R19's call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for a wound vac for one of one resident (Resident R189).Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream) and congestive heart failure (heart can ' t pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply).A review of Resident R189's admission MDS (minimum data assessment) assessment- (periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/29/25, indicated the diagnosis remained current. During an interview with Resident R189 on 9/29/25 at 10:30 a.m., R189 had a wound vac attached to the left hand side of her wheel chair. R189 stated it was for her knee. A review of Resident R189's physician orders dated 9/24/25 indicated no order for the wound vac.During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident-specific plan of care for a resident with limited mobility requiring equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of three residents (Resident R6).Findings include:Review of facility policy Splinting dated August 2025, indicated there must be a physician's order for splinting. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/22/25, indicated diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - when stomach acid flows back into the esophagus, causing symptoms like heartburn), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). During an observation on 9/29/25, at 12:11 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two residents (Resident R17).Findings include:Review of Resident R17's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/29/25, included diagnoses of depression, cancer (a disease characterized by abnormal cell growth and division), and low back pain. During an observation on 9/29/25, at 9:24 a.m. Resident R17 was lying in her bed and a double lumen PICC line was observed in right upper arm. Resident R17 stated it was used for getting fluids once a week and for her chemotherapy medication.During a review of physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to dispose of or reconcile discontinued medication in a timely manner for one of two medication rooms reviewed (Fourth Floor Medication Room).Findings:Review of facility Medication Disposal-Non-controlled Medications policy dated August 2025, indicated discontinued medications and medications left in the facility after a resident ' s discharge or death should be disposed of in a timely manner. Any non-controlled medication product that is discontinued should be appropriately documented on a Medication Reconciliation form.During a medication room review on 9/30/25, at 10:18 a.m. a plastic bin over filled with medication was observed sitting in the corner of the medication room, unsecured and unaccounted for. The medications observed were:- Tylenol (used for fever or pain) - 28 pills- Lovenox injections (used to prevent blood clots) - Two injections- Omeprazole (used to treat acid reflux) - Three pills- Gas Relief - Two bottle- Immodium (used to treat diarrhea) - 30 pills-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in one of two medication rooms (Fourth Floor Medication Room), and failed to properly secure a medication cart while not in use for one of nine medication carts (Third Floor West/Northwest Medication Cart).Findings include:Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing - Medication Storage dated [DATE], indicated during a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering the medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. Facility will ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in medication rooms according to recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. During a medication storage room review on [DATE], at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to make certain exit seeking/wandering residents had a person-centered care plan individualized to each specific resident's needs for eight of 35 residents identified as high risk for wandering/elopement (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8). Findings included: Review of the facility policy Skilled Nursing-Comprehensive Care Plans dated August 2024, indicated a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Review of the facility Elopement Process dated August 2024, indicated an elopement device should be placed if the resident scores a one or above on the elopement evaluation and are an elopement risk. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to report to the State agency an allegation of misappropriation of resident property as required. (Allegation of misappropriation of resident property). Findings include: A review of facility Skilled Nursing - Abuse policy dated 8/24, revealed that the purpose of the policy is to comply with the seven step approach to abuse and neglect detection and prevention. Abuse is defined to include misappropriation of resident property. Step seven of the approach includes reporting the allegation to the proper agencies. During a review of facility documents submitted to the state agency it was revealed that the facility failed to notify the state agency of allegations of facility staff improperly destroying medications no longer prescribed for the resident as required. During a staff interview on 5/21/25 at 9:00 am the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing revealed that they were aware of allegations of staff members inappropriately destroying resident medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for eight of 12 residents (Resident R3, R5, R70, R73, R76, R93, R113, and R361). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights - Quality of Life - Homelike Environment dated August 2024, indicated the facility will provide residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.10(i) Safe Environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. §483.10(i)(2) Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:30 a.m. of Resident R3's room indicated gouges in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for four of four residents (Residents R12, R24, R44, and R60). Findings include: Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing-Oxygen Administration dated August 2024, indicated oxygen is administered residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice and the care plan. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician unless in emergency an order can be obtained as soon as the situation is under control. Review of facility policy Skilled Nursing--Cleaning Changing Nasal Cannulas and Masks dated August 2024, indicated all residents who are receiving oxygen therapy shall have masks and nasal cannula tubing changed weekly and/or as needed. Review of admission record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of nine residents (Resident R46). Findings include: Review of facility policy Nursing-Medication and treatment orders dated 8/24 indicated medications shall be administered only upon written order of duly Licenced and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include morbid obesity, congestive heart failure (serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and diabetes mellitus. Observation on 11/18/24, at 10:15 a.m. Resident R46 was laying in bed, on bed side table there was a cup with 4 pills. Resident R46 stated she had dropped a pill and didn't know where it was located. During and interview on 11/18/24, at 10:45 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E4 confirmed Resident R46 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Users Manual, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of nine residents. (Resident 144) Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), revised October 2023, indicates that quarterly assessments must be no more than 92 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the most recent assessment, and the assessment was to have a completion date that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 144 had an admission MDS assessment completed on 6/6/24. There was no evidence that any MDS assessment, including a quarterly assessment, had been completed after 6/6/24. Review of Resident R144's clinical record on 11/21/24, indicated a quarterly MDS assessment was to be completed by 9/20/24. It was 62…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of two residents (Resident R36 and R158). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs),dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions: -Observation (Look-Back, Assessment) Period is the time period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS assessment. Most MDS items themselves require an observation period, such as 7 or 14 days, depending on the item. Since a day begins at 12:00 a.m. and ends at 11:59 p.m., the observation period must also cover this time period. A standard 7-day look-back period counts back from and includes the Assessment Reference Date (ARD+6 previous days).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update a care plan for one of two residents (Resident R316) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 8/24 indicates a comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and physiological needs is developed for each resident. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R316 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), asthma and atrial fibrillation a heart condition that causes an irregular and often rapid heartbeat in the upper chambers of the heart). Review of Resident R316's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident's interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living, including communication (Resident R36), and eating (Resident R60) for two of seven residents. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Assessment and Care Plan last reviewed 8/24, indicated the Dietician will complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment and nutritional care plan for each resident to be individualized to that resident's nutritional problems and/or needs. The information will be documented in the resident's clinical record. Review of Resident R36's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of aphasia (a disorder that results from damage to portions of the brain that are responsible for language) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R36's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure vital signs parameters (value ranges) were documented on the medication administration record per physician orders for two of six residents (Resident R24, and R70), and failed to discontinue incisional care once healed for one of six residents (Resident R151). Findings include: Review of facility policy Nursing Documentation of Medication Administration dated August 2024, indicated the facility shall maintain a medication administration record to document all medications administered. Review of the facility policy Nursing - Medication and Treatment Orders dated August 2024, indicated orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, and provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three residents (Resident R72). Findings include: Review of facility policy Stage and Treat Pressure Injury, updated in August 2024, indicated the following: 1. Cleanse wound with normal saline before identification and measurement, unless contraindicated. 2. Describe appearance (redness, rash, puffiness, observe edges of wound). 3. Measure length, width, and depth of wound with disposable tape measure. 4. Inspect for drainage and odor. 5. Inspect for presence of eschar in wound bed. 6. Inspect for tunneling. 7. Use Staging Document in Reference options, to identify stage of wound 8. Initiate treatment identified in the Staging Document for the identified stage. Review of facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered contracture management interventions were provided as care planned for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R60). Findings include: Review of Resident R60's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, and hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body). Review of Resident R60's MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R60's [NAME] (care plan chart or template used by nurses to summarize important information about a patient's needs on 11/19/24, indicated the resident will wear palm guard daily on in the morning and off at dinner time. During an observation and interview on 11/20/24, Resident R60 was observed without a palm guard. Resident R60 indicated no one has offered to apply her palm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility provided documents, personnel files, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse aides who failed to become certified within four months were not working in the facility for one of five Employees (Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12). Findings Include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.35(d) Requirement for facility hiring and use of nurse aides- §483.35(d)(1) General rule. A facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months, on a full-time basis, unless- (i) That individual is competent to provide nursing and nursing related services; and (ii)(A) That individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the State as meeting the requirements of §483.151 through §483.154. Review of facility provided documentation dated 11/7/24, indicated it was reported to facility administration that Nurse Aide Trainee Employee E12 failed to obtain the certified nurse aide within 120 days of working in a nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of four residents reviewed (Resident 67). Findings include: Review of Resident R67's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 67's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated 4/4/24, indicated that the facility assessed Resident R67 as having a diagnosis of dementia and cognition was moderately impaired. A review of Resident R67's clinical record from 4/17/24, through 9/22/24, failed to indicate that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive loss. Interview on 11/20/24, at 1:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed provide food items consistent with the prescribed diet order for two of five residents observed during dining (Resident R60 and R74). Findings include: Review of facility policy Diet orders and notification of diet changes dated 8/24 indicates the first initial physician dietary order will be prescribed by the Attending physician. Review of physician orders for Resident R60 confirmed a diet order dated 8/1/23 for Regular diet, Pureed texture, Nectar/Mildly Thick consistency. During an observation on 11/19/24, at 10:02 a.m. Resident R60's was observed with a yellow, thin fluid in her cup. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 confirmed Resident R60 was not provided nectar/mildly thick consistency fluids. LPN, Employee E15 stated last week Resident R60 received regular apple juice instead of nectar/mildly thick apple juice. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/19/24, at 10:14 a.m. confirmed Resident R60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for two of five residents (Resident R74). Findings include: Review of facility policy Diet orders and notification of diet changes dated 8/24 indicates the first initial physician dietary order will be prescribed by the Attending physician. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, orthostatic hypotension and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident R74's care plan dated 8/19/24, indicated provide adaptive equipment for feeding as needed: Kennedy cup with meals. During an observation on 11/18/24, at 12:15 p.m. Resident R74 did not have Kennedy cup as care planned with lunch. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E4 confirmed the above-mentioned findings. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/18/24, ay 2:00 p.m. confirmed Resident R74 should have had a [NAME] cup as care planned. 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, facility incident documentation, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing a two-person transfer as per physician's order for one out of eight sampled resident records (Resident R1). This was identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility Abuse policy dated 2/7/24, indicated that neglect is the failure of the community, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The facility Lifting and transferring residents policy dated 11/20/23, indicated that it is the policy to lift and transfer residents as safely as possible. Mechanical lifts are done by two nursing or therapy personnel. All nursing team members must use the lifting devices as specified in the physician's order. Review of Resident R1's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to meet the daily nutritional and special dietary needs for one of six residents (Resident R1), and failed to have a structured meal delivery system to ensure residents received their meals accurately, and timely. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dietary-Frequency of Meals and Snacks dated 12/6/23, indicated it is the responsibility of the Dining Services Department to see that each meal is served at the designated time unless there is an emergency. Review of the facility policy Skilled Nursing-Dietary Supplements dated 4/12/23, indicated it is the policy of this community that nutritional and dietary supplements will be used to complement a resident's dietary needs in order to maintain adequate nutritional status and resident's highest practicable level of well-being. Review of Resident R1's record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurate for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medical Records-The Medical Record date 12/12/23, indicated that the medical record will contain complete and accurate documentation, which clearly identifies the resident, justifies the diagnoses, condition, treatment, care approaches, and responses to the care provided. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (constricted airways cause difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and congestive heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood effectively). Review of Resident R1's current physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to cover, label and date food products, properly dispose of contaminated food products, maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner, and properly wash and sanitize equipment in the Main Kitchen (Main Kitchen). Findings include: A review of facility policy Dietary' Food Receiving and Storage dated 8/23, indicated that foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Foods will be covered, labeled and dated. Foods will be stored using a first in first out system. A review of facility policy Dietary- Refrigerators and Freezers dated 8/23, indicated that that all food products will be rotated according to expiration dates. Expiration dates include receiving dates and use by dates. Use by dates will be indicated on all prepared foods and food products that have been opened, A review of facility policy Dietary - Sanitation dated 8/23, indicated the food service area will be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of refuse to prevent the potential infestation of rodents and insects for three of three refuse disposal containers (recycle bin, furniture and equipment dumpster, and compactor unit). Findings include: A review of facility policy Dietary- Food Related Garbage and Rubbish dated 8/23, indicated that garbage and rubbish will be disposed of in accordance with current state laws regulating such matters. Garbage and rubbish will be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to vermin. Outside dumpsters will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. During an observation on 11/13/23, at 9:10 am the following was revealed: * the lids on the recycle dumpster were open. * the dumpster used for the disposal of furniture and equipment was uncovered and contained two bags of garbage and several disposable food containers and a pizza box. * the compactor unit was uncovered and contained bags of garbage that had not been compacted. The compactor unit was open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-20 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility employee personnel files, documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Director of Dining Services (DDS) to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 11 of 11 months. (1/23 through 11/23). Findings include: A review of the job description entitled Director of Dining Services revealed that the essential duties of the position include identifies and suggests innovative approaches and helps implement performance improvement opportunities. Education and experience requirements include Bachelor's degree preferred, or a minimum of two years related experience and training or equivalent combination of education and experience. Certification requirements include ServSafe Certification, Certified Dining Manager Certification or must obtain within one year of actively working as the Director of Dining Services. During an interview on 11/13/23, at 9:00 am Director of Dining Services (DDS) Employee E1 indicated that she has held the position of DDS since August 2022. Her certification credentials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident council group interview, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to offer residents the opportunity to vote for the November 2023 election (Second and Third floors). Findings include: The facility Resident rights-overview policy reviewed dated 6/23/23, and last reviewed 8/2023, indicated that residents have the right to exercise their rights as residents of the community and as citizens of the United States of America. During a resident council group interview on 11/14/23, at 1:00 p.m. seven out of seven residents indicated that they did not recieve assistance with voting registration for the election on November 2023. During an interview on 11/14/23, at 2:01 p.m. the Activities director Employee E3 stated that she has not been a part of voting registration process since she started her position. During an interview on 11/15/23, at 11:27 a.m. Resident R78 stated: I've been here 3-4 years. The social worker did her part to help me register. But i never received a ballot. I can't recall when that happened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and records, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician for a change in condition for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings: A review of the Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy dated 4/10/23, last reviewed 8/23, indicated the facility shall promptly notify the reisdent's attending physician of changes in the resident's status. It was indicated the nutse supervisor or charge nurse must notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been a significant change in resident's physical condition. It was indicated a significant change of condition is a decline in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease related clinical interventions or impacts more than one area of the resident's health status. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, documents and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Skilled Nursing-Abuse revised August 2023, revealed, that it is the policy of the community that each resident will be free from abuse. Abuse will mean all forms of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation. None of this will be tolerated. The community will educate staff and other applicable individuals in techniques to protect all parties. Abuse allegations are reported per Federal and State law. Employees must always report any abuse or suspicions of abuse immediately to the Administrator. Review of admission record indicated that Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/3/23, indicated diagnoses unspecified dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, review of facility submitted documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 12). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Skilled Nursing-Abuse revised August 2023, revealed, that abuse allegations are reported per Federal and State law. Employees must always report any abuse or suspicions of abuse immediately to the Administrator. Review of facility submitted documentation dated 10/13/23, revealed that an incident had occurred on 10/4/23, at approximately 10:30 p.m. It was reported that Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E7 told a resident (Resident R12) to shut up and applied scotch tape over resident's mouth for a few seconds and then removed it telling her Now be quiet. Further review of facility submitted report revealed that several staff members were at the nurses' station waiting on the next shift to give report. Resident R12 was exhibiting distress reactions and yelling out for help and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change in condition for one of five residents receiving hospice services (Resident R5). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that a significant change in status assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14-days from effective date of the hospice election. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for three of fourteen residents (Residents R5, R18, and R202). Findings include: Review of the facility Skilled Nursing - Comprehensive Care plans dated August 2023, previously reviewed August 2022, indicated that A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs is developed for each resident. A review of Resident R5's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included constipation, muscle weakness, and cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture). A review of Resident R5's MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis were current. A review of Resident R5's care plan dated 11/14/23, failed to include a care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the bowel regimen protocol and provide treatment as required for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings: A review of the Bowel Protocol policy dated 8/23, indicated if a resident has not had a bowel movement in two days (six shifts), non-pharmacological interventions will be initiated on the morning of day three could include prune juice, bran, applesauce. If still no bowel movement, then administer 30ml of 400mg/5ml of Milk of Magnesia (over the counter treatment for constipation), then if still no bowel movement administer 10 mg of Dulcolax suppository (a laxative that stimulates bowel movement designed to be inserted into the rectum to dissolve). It was indicated if no bowel movement still, then administer a fleet enema 19g-7g/118ml (liquid medicine used to help you have a bowel movement that is inserted into the rectum). Then, if no bowel movement, contact physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and records, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent pressure sore development and provide treatment as required for two of four residents (Resident R5 and R14). A review of the Dressing Change Policy policy dated 4/11/23, last reviewed 8/23, indicated it is the facility's policy to treat, measure, and track each wound individually. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture), and anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood). A review of Resident R5's MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis were current. Section M: Skin Conditions indicated the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and did not have any current pressure ulcers. A review of Resident R5's Braden Scale for Predicating Pressure Score Risk dated 11/22/22, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician order indicated a catheter size for a urinary catheter (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine) for two of six residents (Residents R5, R15, and R103), and failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for one of six residents (Resident R103). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture), and anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood). A review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/5/23, indicated the diagnosis were current. A review of Resident R5's physician order dated 5/26/23, indicated to change catheter as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper hydration status was maintained by providing intravenous fluids as ordered for one of four residents (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 14's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/3/23, indicated diagnoses of prostate cancer, dementia (neuro-cognitive disorder impacting reasoning, judgment, and memory), and high blood pressure. Review of clinical records revealed a physician's order dated 10/23/23, for sodium chloride intravenous (IV- in the vein) solution 0.45% with 20 mEq (milliequivalent) potassium (a solution used to supply water, salt and potassium) at 60 milliliters per hour every shift for dehydration to be administered from 10/23/23 on night shift until 10/25/23 on night shift. Review of Resident R14 's progress note dated 10/25/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy clinical record and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically related social services to one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R5). Findings include: Review of facility documentation Job Description for a social worker, indicated it is the duty of the social worker to respond to each resident social needs from the time of admission throughout the resident's stay, collaborating with other staff and professionals both in and outside the facility in developing and implementing coordinated individualized plan of care and supportive services. It was indicated it is the social worker responsibility to respond to the needs of the resident and family. It stated the social work duty is to assist residents and families with end of life decision making and provide educational materials, answer questions, and assist with making hospice referral. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that outdated biologicals were discarded in one of two medication rooms (Second Floor), and to accurately date open medications for one of four medications carts (Second floor North-East medication cart). Findings include: The facility Storage of medications policy last reviewed 8/2023, indicated that outdated medications will be removed from inventory, and that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly. During an observation on 11/14/23, at 11:50 a.m. in the Second Floor medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E6 indicated the following: Dextrose 5% ( a solution of water and sugar adminstered via intravenous (IV) -in the vein) with an expiration date of May 2023 Central Line Tray ( used for aseptic dressing removal, cleaning and prepping of IV sites) with an expiration date of April 2023 During an interview on 11/14/23, at 11:50 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E6 confirmed that the facility failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end of life care for three of seven residents (Resident R5, R80, and R103). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions for Section O, Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs: Facilities may code treatments, procedures, and programs that the resident performed themselves independently or after set-up by facility staff. Check all treatments, procedures, and programs received or performed by the resident after admission/entry or reentry to the facility and within the 14-day lookback period. Section O0100K…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a pneumococcal immunization was offered to one of five residents (Resident R48). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated August 2023, indicated that the pneumococcal vaccination will be offered upon admission. Review of the admission Record indicated that Resident R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/25/23, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, and weakness. Section O0300 Pneumococcal Vaccine indicated Resident R48 was not offered the pneumonia vaccination. During an interview on 11//17/23, at 11:22 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that a resident was assessed for and offered pneumococcal immunization for one of five residents. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-11-22 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of five residents hospital transfers (Resident R77, R96, R131). Findings include: Review of Resident R131's admission record indicated she was originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression and diabetes mellitus. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R131 was transferred to hospital on 3/23/24 and returned to the facility on 3/28/24. Review of Resident R131's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written information about the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer to the hospital on 3/23/24. Review of Resident R77's admission record indicated she was originally admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$132,149 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $74,263 — penalty dated 2025-10-15
  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
  • $49,608 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.4-2.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DORMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/14/2021
FRANK, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/27/2024
GRAY, ROBERTAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
LIN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/14/2021
MASSELLA, JOANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/14/2021
PIEFFER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/14/2021
MALISKY, JIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCAREOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/1984

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 3%Other / private 49%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$421per resident / day
operating cost
$12,794per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395713. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next