Fairview Rehab And Care Center
184 Bethlehem Pike, Philadelphia, PA 19118 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (215) 247-5311 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,431 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.6% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.9% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.92 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.8%CMS range 23.8–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.7–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.5–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 161.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
83 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 72 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, the review of clinical records, and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate staff supervision and monitoring to Resident R1 who was found to have a alcohol bottles in the resident's room. The facility's failure to provide adequate staff supervision and monitoring to Resident R1 with a history of storing and consuming alcohol resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to Resident R1 who sustained a fall, required transfer to the hospital and was diagnosed with a fracture hip for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the September 2024, physician orders for Resident R1 revealed the diagnoses of arthritis; hypertension (high blood pressure); bipolar disorder (condition in which a person has periods of depression and periods of being extremely happy); depression (major loss of interest in pleasurable activities), and repeated falls. Review of the nursing notes from May 1, 2024, through September 5, 2024, revealed that the resident sustained five falls. The falls occurred on:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observations of the physical environment of the main kitchen and first floor dining room, reviews of pest control reports, interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the building was free of pests and rodents. Findings include: Observations of the main kitchen at 11:30 a.m., on April 6, 2026, revealed that the tiled flooring throughout the main kitchen contained areas of worn away and missing grouting. The flooring in areas of high-water usage: the dish room, three compartment sinks and food preparation and cooking areas contained an accumulation of food debris. The missing grouting between the tiles on the flooring evidenced moist food debris. The unrepaired flooring was not easily cleanable for dietary staff. The entire perimeter of the main kitchen evidenced a heavy accumulation of food debris with multiple holes along the baseboard of the flooring. A build-up of food debris was observed underneath large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on one of two nursing floors. (Second floor)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Homelike Environment with a revised dated of February 2021 state, Policy Statement- Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Further review of the policy states, 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment. Observations of the Second floor on March 31, 2026, between 10:15 a.m. - 10:40a.m. revealed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed two top corners of the wall had wallpaper peeling. Behind the (window) bed was an outlet exposed due to the wall bubbling up and pushing out. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council interview, staff interviews, review of facility policy and reviews of the established mealtime schedule, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nourishing snack was provided when 14 hours are between a substantial evening meal and breakfast on the three of three nursing units. (First, Second, and Third Floors).Findings include:A review of the Facility Policy titled Frequency of Meals last revised, March 2017 revealed Each resident shall receive at least three meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtime in the community or in accordance with resident need, preferences and requests and the plan of care. The facility will serve at least three meals or their equivalent daily at scheduled times. There will not be more than a fourteen-hour span between the evening meal and breakfast. Under bulletin #5 & 6 further revealed Nourishing snacks will be available for residents who need or desire additional food between meals. Evening snack will be offered routinely to all residents. Timing of the snack will consider relevant factors. Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy it was determined that facility failed maintain a safe, clean comfortable and home like environment for residents of one of three nursing units. (First floor and 3rd floor shower room)Findings Include:Facility Policy titled Cleaning and disinfecting Resident's Rooms last revised on August 2013 stated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting resident's rooms. Housekeeping surfaces will be disinfected on regular bases and when surfaces are visibly soiled. Under bulletin #6 it stated floor mopping solution will be replaced every three resident rooms or changed no less often than at 60 minutes intervals.Observation of first floor nursing unit on January 6, 2026, 11:34 a.m. revealed there was a strong odor of urine in the hallway of the 1st unit as you get on the unit. Observation of the first-floor nursing unit on January 6, 2026, at 12:09 p.m. revealed a strong odor of urine and feces in the hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff, and review grievance, it was determined that the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve residents' grievances and/or concerns for 1 of 1 resident interviewed (Resident R145) and facility did not share the results of the grievances resolution to 15 of 15 residents reviewed during the resident council (Residents R3, R4, R12, R16, R26, R28, R59, R65, R72, R88, R112, R119, R136, R145, R146).Findings include:On January 6, 2026, at 2:36 p.m., Resident R145 reported that his cell phone was damaged while it was lying on the heating unit in his room. He stated that he notified the Administrator a few months ago and provided an invoice for a replacement cell phone he purchased; however, his grievance had not been resolved. He further reported that he notified the Administrator again on this date and provided a second copy of the invoice.On January 7, 2026, at 10:12 a.m., grievance records dated November 10, 2025, were reviewed. The grievance stated: Resident R145 let admin know cellphone was damaged; wanted reimbursed. Cell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of misappropriation of resident property related to diversion of narcotic medication for four of four residents reviewed who were prescribed narcotic medications. (Resident R36, R53, R83, R165).Findings include: Review of facility policy Controlled Substances, revised 2022, revealed controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow up. The system of reconciling the receipt, dispensing, and disposition of controlled substances includes the following:Records of personal access and usageMedication administration recordsDeclining inventory recordsDestruction, waste and return to pharmacy records.Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon interviews with facility staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed to rule out neglect when one resident slipped on a wet floor and sustained a fracture for one of 32 resident records reviewed (Resident R90). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating revised September 2022, states that all allegations are thoroughly investigated and at a minimum, interviews are conducted to any witnesses to the incident and/or staff members (on all shifts) who had contact with the resident during the alleged incident, and documents the investigation completely and thoroughly. Resident R90 was admitted to the facility February 2025, diagnosed with dementia. Facility documentation/investigation revealed on April 19, 2025, the resident suffered a fall that fractured the resident's humerus from a wet floor recently mopped by housekeeping. The documentation stated the Wet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for one of four resident care plans reviewed (Resident R162). Review of facility policy Care Plans-Baseline, revised 2022, revealed a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following:a. Initial goals based on admission orders and discussion with the resident/representative;b. Physician orders;c. Dietary orders;d. Therapy services;e. Social services; andf. PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that professional standards of quality were met related to blood pressure management for one of 32 residents (Resident R36).Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that professional standards of quality were met related to blood pressure management for one of 32 residents (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy Blood Pressure, Measuring, dated September 2010, revealed that Hypertension is usually defined as blood pressure over 140/90 mm/Hg . Hypotension is defined as blood pressure less than 100/60 mm/Hg . Continued review revealed that Hypertension should be reported to the physician. If a resident has a hypertensive reading, staff should record several readings taken at different times of the day, and Hypotension should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff and review of facility documentation revealed the facility failed to give one resident diagnosed with Alzheimer Disease and a history of wandering adequate supervision when found in a restricted area for one of 32 residents (Resident R129).Findings include:Review of Resident R129 clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (a form of dementia with cognitive decline) and a history of wandering in the facility.Nursing note dated September 8, 2025, indicated Resident R129 was witnessed to have retrieved a urine specimen from the specimen fridge and sipped it.Nursing was reeducated on the facility's policy related to Hazardous Areas, Device and Equipment revied in July 2017. Policy defines a hazard as Anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness .and Open areas or items that should be locked when not in use. Furthermore, the same policy indicates assessment and analysis of hazardous area and equipment will include resident-specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 72 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that medication was administered according to the physician's order for one of 32 residents reviewed (R65).During an interview on January 6, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., resident R65 stated that she had recently been on antibiotic drops for an ear infection, but that she had not received multiple doses. She stated that one of the nurses informed her that the drops could not be located, but the nurse had requested a pharmacy refill. The resident stated that no one ever came back and gave her the missing doses.Review of clinical documentation revealed that resident R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, asthma, hypertension, and arthritis. Revie of clinical documents revealed that the resident was prescribed Neomycin-polymyxin-HC otic solution 3.5-10,000-1.instill 3 drop[s] in right ear four times a day for Ear Infection for 10 days, indicating a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the first floor nursing unit was adequately equipped with a functional resident call bell system for one out of the three units observed. (First Nursing Unit).Findings include:A review of the Facility Policy titled Call System, Residents last revised on September 2023revelaed Resident are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation.On January 7, 2026, at 9:34 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R156, who reported that her call bell was not working. The surveyor tested the call bell and observed that no light was activated at her bedside or outside the room. The call bell for her roommate, Resident R25, was also tested and found not to be functioning. Nursing Assistant Employee E7 confirmed that these call bells were not working. Additional testing revealed that call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility records, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not maintain an adequate pest control program related to insects for three of three units reviewed (1st floor, 2nd floor, and 3rd floor). Findings Include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the rectum and colon, and hypertension. Review of his most recent comprehensive MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic assessment of resident needs) completed on September 25, 2025, revealed the resident to have a BIMS score (Brief Interview for Mental Status- an assessment of the resident's cognitive state) of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating that he was cognitively intact. During an interview with resident R36 on January 7, 2026, at 10:45 a.m., he revealed that he often saw roaches and other insects in his room and other areas of the building. He stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Findings Include: A review of the Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) Form CMS-10055 revealed that examples of the common reasons why an extended care stay, or services may not be covered under Medicare might include the beneficiary no longer requires daily skilled care for a medical condition but wants to continue residing in the skilled nursing facility (SNF). The SNF enters a good faith estimate of the cost of the corresponding care that may not be covered by Medicare. In the blank that follows Beginning on ., the skilled nursing facility enters the date on which the beneficiary may be responsible for paying for care that Medicare is not expected to cover. The beneficiary selects an option box to indicate a desire to continue to receive the care or not to continue to receive the care and if there is a desire to have the bill submitted to Medicare for consideration. The beneficiary or their authorized representative must sign the signature box to acknowledge that they read and understood the notice. The SNF must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a copy of a resident's medical and financial records upon request by the resident one of one clinical record reviewed. (Resident R1)Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 had a care conference on June 2, 2025. During an interview with Resident R1 on August 28, 2025, at 10:38 a.m., it was confirmed that a request had been made for the full medical and financial records.On August 28, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., an interview with the Administrator, Employee E1 revealed that a meeting had been held a few weeks ago with Resident R1 and their family, during which Resident R1 requested a copy of their medical and financial records. These records were never provided to Resident R1. The Administrator confirmed that a full set of medical and financial records had not been given. It was further revealed that the medical record department is in the process of making a copy of the records to provide to Resident R1 as of today.A further interview with Employee E1 on August 28, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records reviewed and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's urinary catheter's bag was maintained in sanitary condition for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral stage 4 (ulcer involving full thickness of skin loss), urinary tract infection, klebsiella pneumoniae (gram-negative bacterium commonly found in the intestine of humans which causes unitary [NAME] infections, pneumonia, bloodstream infections).A review of the physician orders dated May 8, 2025, revealed an order for a supra pubic urinary catheter 20 fr (french) 30 ml (milliliters) for obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of the urinary track).During an interview with Resident R1 on August 28, 2025, at 10:38 a.m., it was noted that the resident's urinary catheter's leg bag was lying on top of the sink in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility was adequately equipped resident call system for the second floor nursing unit, 7 out of 7 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6 and R7).Findings include:Review of information submitted to the State Survey Agency on August 4, 2025 indicated that the resident call system at the facility was not working properly, and that some residents had to yell for help. The information submitted also indicated that the facility provided hand-held silver bells for residents to use to shake when they need help, and that such bells cannot be heard from a distance. During interview with Resident R1 and Resident R2's room on August 21, 2025 at 10:20 A.M. both residents reported that their call bells have not worked for quite some time. Resident R1 and Resident R2 reported that they have to yell for help because staff cannot hear them when they ring the silver handheld bells. Resident R1's call bell was not observed in her room during the above referenced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was conducted into a resident's allegation of a fall for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1)Findings include:Review of the August 2025 physician orders for the resident included diagnosis that included hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); arthritis; history of falling; diabetes (a group of common endocrine diseases characterized by sustained high blood sugar levels); schizophrenia ( a mental disorder characterized variously by hearing voices, having false beliefs that conflict with reality , disorganized thinking or behavior, and flat or inappropriate affect) and substance abuse. Review of a nursing note dated April 5, 2025 at 3:05 p.m. indicated Resident reports falling last week, she states she dose[sic] not remember the day but it was approximately Tuesday at 5am when she fell. She reports slipping on water at left bed side while attempting to walk to wheelchair, hitting her head when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered plan of care was developed for a resident with a history of substance abuse for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of Resident R1 August 2025 physician orders revealed the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); arthritis; history of falling; diabetes (a group of common endocrine diseases characterized by sustained high blood sugar levels); schizophrenia ( a mental disorder characterized variously by hearing voices, having false beliefs that conflict with reality, disorganized thinking or behavior, and flat or inappropriate affect) and substance abuse. Review of the resident's person-centered plan of care included a plan of care dated July 18, 2023, stating that the resident admitted to smoking drugs in her room. Interventions included the use of a smoke detector in the resident's room, restricting the resident's leave of absence visits on a temporary basis, and supervised visitation. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident had a physician's order for a leave of absence from the facility for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Signing Resident' s Out-LOA (Leave of Absence), with a revision date for August 2006 indicated that each resident leaving the premises (excluding transfers and discharges) must be signed out. Review of Resident R1's August 2025 physician orders included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); arthritis; history of falling; diabetes (a group of common endocrine diseases characterized by sustained high blood sugar levels); schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized variously by hearing voices, having false beliefs that conflict with reality , disorganized thinking or behavior, and flat or inappropriate affect, and other psychoactive), and substance abuse. Review of nursing note dated March 6, 2025 at 9:30 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in the resident's condition for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2021 revealed the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician, or physician on call, when there has been a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. Per the facility policy, a significant change of condition is a major decline, or improvement, in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention. Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated July 3, 2025, revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], status post hospitalization. Continued review of Resident R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical record documentation for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R2).Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician order dated July 2, 2025, for daily respiratory assessment every day shift, which included documentation of lung sounds, pulse and O2 saturation (measures the amount of oxygen in the blood).Continued review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a nursing note dated July 4, 2025, at 10:20 a.m. by Licensed Nurse, Employee E3, that indicated upon attempt to administer medication, resident appears to be lethargic with very little verbal response. VS [vital signs] WNL [within normal limits] at this time.Review of Resident R1's entire clinical record revealed no documented evidence Licensed Nurse, Employee E3, documented the daily respiratory assessment or what Resident R1's vital signs were on July 3, 2025.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error for tone of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy: Medication and Treatment Orders, revealed that Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. Upon admission, the admitting nurse will review the transfer record of the newly admitted patient. The admitting nurse will then notify the attending physician or on-call physician to review admission medications on the transfer record. After medications are reviewed with the physician, the admitting nurse or designee will input the approved medications from the transfer record into the PCC Emar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for three of three resident floors observed. (First, Second, and Third floors) Findings include: Observations on October 22, 2024 at 9:00 a.m revealed a large dining room on the Third floor just across from the elevator. There were four dining room tables and five stained and soiled dining room style chairs. The room was wallpapered and two of the four walls had large windows. Surveyors were brought to the room by Employee E2, the Director of Nursing for the use of a conference room during the four day survey. Observation on October 22, 2024 at 10:01 a.m. revealed Resident R74's room had five stained ceiling tiles. Observation on October 22, 2024 at 10: 14 a.m. of Resident R110's room revealed an overhead ceiling light on in her room with a large amount of dead bugs in it. Observation on October 22, 2024 at 10:55 a.m. of Resident R56's room revealed a ceiling tile along the wall was missing and there were four stained ceiling tiles.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication regimen reviews were completed monthly by a licensed pharmacist and failed to ensure recommendations were reviewed timely by the physician for 13 of 33 resident records reviewed (Resident R20, R22, R24, R39, R73, R83, R91, R92, R110, R121, R127, R130, R132) Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Consultant Pharmacist Provider Requirements revised January 2021 indicates a system is established where the pharmacist recommendations regarding customers' (residents') drug therapy are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement and/or respond to the recommendations in an appropriate and timely fashion. The policy continues to explain that reviewing medication/drug regimen, which includes all drugs currently ordered for the customer (resident), including prn (as needed) and routine drugs, are reviewed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control progam related to enhanced barrier precautions, personal protective equipment and catheter care for three of three floors reviewed. (First, Second, and Third floors). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated April 2024, revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention used in conjunction with Standard Precautions expanding the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during high contact resident care activities to reduce the risk of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Further review revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions are indicated for residents with any of the following wherever they reside in the facility: Wounds and /or indwelling medical devices, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for eight of ten months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (January 2024 through October 2024). Findings Include: Facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship (revised 2016), indicated that Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotics Stewardship Program. The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Review of facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes (revised 2016), indicated that Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) that worked at least part time at the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection Preventionist (revised 2016), revealed the infection preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection prevention and control policies and practices. Review of facility documentation for the months of January 2024 through October 2024 revealed January 2024 and February 2024 were the only months that infections and antibiotic use was being monitored. During a phone interview on October 28, 2024 at 1:35 p.m., Infection Preventionist, Employee E12, stated she is still employed at the facility, but has not been in the facility since June 2024. Interview with Director of Nursing, Employee E2, on October 28, 2024 at 1:55 p.m. confirmed the facility failed to designate a part time infection preventionist. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0907 — patternProvide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility to provide sufficient space in relation to dining and recreation services for one of three floor reviwed. (third floor). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Resident Rights, revised February 2021, revealed, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a dignified existence. Review of facility policy, Dignity, reviewed February 2021, revealed, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are provided with a dignified dining experience. Review of facility policy, Dining Room Audits, revised October 2017, revealed, Our facility audits the food and nutrition services department regularly to ensure that resident needs are met and that dining is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential dining equipment in the dining room pantries and essential resident equipment was maintained in proper working order for three of three floors reviewed. (First, second, and third floors). Findings Include: Observation on October 23, 2024 of the dining room on the second floor at 12:02 p.m. revealed black mold under sink in the serving pantry area. Further observation revealed a cabinet was broken on bottom under steam table. Observation on October 23, 2024 of the dining room on the first floor at 12:10 p.m. revealed a dining room pantry area with an ice machine with an out of order not currently working. The hand sink was dirty with dirt residue in the sink and around the water handles and spout of the sink. Under the hand sink the cabinet had black mold. There was a double fridge that was not working, the inside and outside of it was dirty with liquid residue. There was a display refrigerator that was not turned on. In the pantry area there was a refrigerator with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide timely notice of non-medical coverage (NOMNC) for three of three residents reviewed. (Resident R158, R314, R315). Findings Include: Review of facility beneficiary notice worksheet completed for the past six months revealed resident R315 was discharged home on September 11, 2024. There was no documentation showing that a Notice of Non-Medical Coverage (NOMNC) was reviewed with the resident prior to discharge. Review of facility beneficiary notice worksheet completed for the past six months revealed resident R314 was given a discharge date of June 2, 2024 but remained at the facility. Review of facility beneficiary notice worksheet completed for the past six months revealed resident R158 was given a discharge date of September 1, 2024 but remained at the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing Employee E2 on October 24, 2024 at 1:03 p.m. confirmed the facility did not have NOMNC's for the resident reviewed and that the facility was not completing the Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of employee files, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct required criminal background checks in a timely manner prior to employment for one of five new hired employees. (Employee E23) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program with a revision date of April 2021 states, Policy Statement-Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Further review of policy states, 4. Conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; had a finding entered into the state nurse aide registry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative of the resident being transferred to the hospital twice for falls for one of 33 residents reviewed (Residents R24) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, and Brief Psychotic Disorder. Review of Resident R24's clinical record revealed the resident has a Guardian in place for her care. Further review of Resident R24's clinical record revealed he resident has had several falls at the facility that resulted in the resident being taken to the hospital. Review of a nursing progress note from August 3, 2024 revealed: late entry note for 8/4/2024 1930, resident had a fall in the hallway, she hit her head on the floor obtaining a 0.5 cm shin tear to her right eyebrow area. she was transferred to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities that enhanced the resident's interactions for one of three floors observed. (Third floor) Findings Include: Observation made of several resident rooms on the Third floor on October 22, 2024 revealed the resident's did not have updated activities calendars posted in their rooms. All resident rooms observed on the Third floor had calendars posted that were from the month of September 2024. Interview with the Assistant Director of Activities Employee E11 on October 23, 2024 at 10:11 a.m. revealed that there was currently no calendar that was made for the month of October 2024. Employee E11 revealed that he had trouble creating the calendar therefore one was never made or given to residents throughout the facility. Employee E11 revealed that there was currently no Director of Activities employed at the facility. Observation on October 22, 2024October 23, 2024 and October 24, 2024 of the Third floor hallway by the nurses station revealed residents gathered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a resident received care in accordance with profession standards of practice when the facility failed to notify the physician for further instructions for a missed anti-anxiety medication for one resident of 33 clinical records reviewed (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication shortage/Unavailable Medication last revised April 2018 states that when medications are not received or are unavailable to the resident the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in correspondence with the attending physician and the pharmacy. The policy indicates when a medication shortage is noted nursing should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication. Nursing notifies the pharmacy and obtains the status of the order. Using the facility's emergency stock can be utilized. The same policy indicates that if the medication is not obtainable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for four of four personnel files reviewed. (Employees E14, E15, E16, E17) Findings Include: Review of facility personnel files were made for competencies related to Medication Administration, Infection Control, Catheter Care, and Wound Care. Review of licensed nurse Employee E14's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on May 6, 2021 as a licensed nurse. Review of licensed nurse Employee E15's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on July 29, 2024 as a licensed nurse. Review of licensed nurse Employee E16's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on June 5, 2024 as a licensed nurse. Review of licensed nurse Employee E17's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on August 9, 2018 as a licensed nurse. Interview on October 25, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. the Human…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not complete yearly performance review for nurse aides for two of four employees reviewed. (Employees E18 and E19) Findings Include: On October 23, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. with the facilities human resources director Employee E8 was interviewed and employee personnel records were requested for evidence of 12-hour trainings and yearly performance reviews for nurse aides. Four employee personnel records were requested including employee personnel record for nurse aides Employee E18 and E19. Interview on October 25, 2024 at 9:52 a.m. with the facilities human resources director Employee E8 revealed there were no completed yearly performance reviews completed for nurse aides Employee E18 and E19 even though they had been employed at the facility for over a year. Employee E8 stated that the facility had identified this as an issue and they are waiting for the staff educator Employee E12 to return the facility. Employee E8 revelealed Employee E8 is currently working at another facility helping out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate receiving, dispense and administration of medication to meet the needs of a resident according to professional standards of practice relating to medication administration for 1 of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R39 ) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication shortage/Unavailable Medication last revised April 2018 states that when medications are not received or are unavailable to the resident the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in correspondence with the attending physician and the pharmacy. The policy indicates when a medication shortage is noted nursing should immediately initiate action to obtain the medication. Nursing notifies the pharmacy and obtains the status of the order. Using the facility's emergency stock can be utilized. The same policy indicates that if the medication is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and review of clinical records and facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medication inlcuded the date that the medication was opened in accordance with currently accepted professional principles two of four residents' medication administration observed. (Resident R26 and R136). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titles, Administering Medications revised April 2019, indicates the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container On October 24, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13 administering 2 units from an opened vile Aspart (insulin) to Resident R26. Further observation revealed the medication did not include the date when it was originally opened. On October 28, 2024, at 11:53 a.m. surveyor observed LPN, Employee E10 administering aspirin to Resident R136. Further observation revealed the medication did not include the date when it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement program (QAPI) that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life as required. Findings include: Review facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program -Governance and Leadership states the QAPI program is overseen and implemented by the QAPI committee, which reports its findings actions and results to the administration and governing body. The administration whether a member of the QAPI committee or not is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body. The governing body is responsible for ensuring that the QUAPI program is implemented and maintained to address identified priorities, is sustained through transition of leadership and staffing is adequately resourced and funded sufficient to conduct the activities of the program, is based on data, resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, interview with residents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received and were offered pneumococcal vaccines for one of 33 residents reviewed. (Resident R22) Findings Include: Interview held with Resident R22 on October 22, 2024 at 1:11 p.m. revealed the resident wanted to have the pneumococcal vaccine but had not yet been offered it by the facility. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed no information regarding the resident being educated on or offered the vaccination over the past year. On October 24, 2024 at 3:15 p.m. and interview with was held with the Director of Nursing Employee E2 and she confirmed that the facility had not yet offered pneumococcal vaccines to this resident or to any other resident in the facility. Employee E2 revealed that an issue she found after becoming employed this year with the facility is that the facility had no practice in place for offering residents on a yearly basis. Employee E2 revealed that the facility was currently working without an Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interviews and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and through investigation for a resident's allegation of missing cigarettes and the facility failed to ensure that residents in the facility were protected from further potential abuse related to an allegation of an alleged perpetrator stealing money and jewelry for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, that the facility identified as being their abuse investigation policy, dated July 2017, indicated that all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator. The policy also indicated that the nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document the investigation of the accident or incident to include, but not limited to, the date and time the accident or incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility regarding a resident who was storing and consuming alcohol at the facility, sustained a fall, required transfer to the hospital and diangnosis of right hip fracture, which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided by the facility indicated that the primary purpose of the position is to manage the facility in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards, following all facility policies and applying them uniformly to all employees, in addition to ensuring the highest degree of quality care is provided to the facility residents at all times. The duties and responsibilities of NHA included, but are not limited to: reviewing policies and procedures periodically, at least annually, and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of pest control logs, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control environment. Findings include: During an interview with the facility's maintenance director on September 13, 2024, at 9:55 a.m. the maintenance director reported that the facility contracted for pest control services twice a week. It was also explained that books are located on each nursing unit on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor, and the kitchen where staff document sightings of roaches, bugs, flies mice on the unit, in resident rooms, and in the kitchen. Review of the pest control contract provided by the facility indicated that the kitchen, dining room, staff cafeteria, vending machine areas and nursing stations will be serviced on a regular basis with all other areas will be serviced as necessary. Continued review of the contract indicated that interior and exterior deficiencies will be noted and reported to the maintenance personnel (e.g. gaps under doors, holes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan related to wound care for one of nine resident records reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of obesity, gout (a condition which causes pain in the joints, especially those of the feet), muscle weakness, urinary incontinence, and stage three (injuries caused by prolonged pressure on an area of skin, stage three extends through the outer layers of skin and into the tissue underneath) pressure ulcers of the left and right buttocks. Continued review revealed that a skin assessment was completed for Resident R2 upon his admission by licensed nursing staff. This assessment stated, the resident has an open area on his left and right buttock that are dime sized. This assessment was confirmed by the wound specialist, Licensed Nurse Practitioner,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that wound care was completed appropriately to treat pressure ulcers for four of five residents with wounds reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation for Resident R1 revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart pumps ineffectively and causes an excess of fluid to build up in the body, especially around the lungs), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, and gout (a condition which causes pain in the joints, especially those of the feet). Review of wound assessment and treatment notes written by the wound care specialist, Licensed Nurse Practitioner, Employee E4 revealed the following: On June 11, 2024, Employee E4 recommended that Resident R1 receive wound care consisting of, Daily and PRN (as needed) .Cleanse with normal saline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that physician assessments were accurately completed and documented to reflect the actual condition of the residents for four of nine records reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Physician Visits, revised April 2013, revealed that during physician visits The attending physician must perform relevant tasks .including a review of the resident's total program of care and appropriate documentation. Review of clinical documentation for Resident R1 revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart pumps ineffectively and causes an excess of fluid to build up in the body, especially around the lungs), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease, and gout (a condition which causes pain in the joints,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that five of seven residents were receiving treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as indicated in their comprehensive person-centered care plan. (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) Findings include: Review of the policy titled administering medications dated April, 2019 revealed that medications were to be administered in a safe and timely manner as prescribed by the attending physician. The policy also indicated that medications were to be administered in accordance with the prescribed orders, including any required time frames. The policy said that the licensed individual administering the medication was required to document in the clinical record the date and time the medication was administered, the dosage, the route of administration, the injection site if applicable, any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered, any results achieved and when those results were observed and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not obtain, clarify and/or follow physican orders related to laboratory studies in a timely manner for one of four records reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for resident R2 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility for skilled nursing care on March 14, 2013. The admitting diagnoses included but were not limited to; obstructive uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that causes a restriction in the flow of urine), chronic kidney disease (a disease of the kidneys that can lead to kidney failure) hypertension (high blood pressure), malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer of the prostate gland), diabetes (a condition in which the body does not produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar effectively) and history of urinary tract infections. Additional review of the clinical record for resident R2 revealed an entry in the progress notes dated January 22, 2024, documenting that the resident left the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell alert system was in working order for one of three nursing units (first floor nursing unit). Findings include: During an observation tour of the nursing care unit located on the first floor of the facility on February 29, 2024, at approximately 11:30 a.m. the surveyor initiated the call bell alert system in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] at the bed by the window. The surveyor noted that the call bell alert system did not sound and the visual aid did not light for resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor checked with staff at the nursing station and staff confirmed that nurse call bell for room [ROOM NUMBER] had not been activated. Interview on February 29, 2024, at approximately 12:30 p.m. with the maintenance director, Employee E3, confirmed that the call bell alert system was not working for the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] (window bed). 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 205.67(k) Electric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long- Term Care Ombudsman of facility initiated transfers and failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer for two of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R91 and R71). Findings Include: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set-Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R91 dated December 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated that the cognitive status was moderately impaired. Review of nursing note for Resident R91 dates December 7, 2023, revealed that the resident experienced a change in condition related to abnormal vital signs. Resident R91 was assessed by the physician who recommended that the resident to be sent out to the hospital for further assessment and evaluation. Resident R91 was discharged to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for two of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R91 and R71) Findings include: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set-Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R91 dated December 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated that the cognitive status was moderately impaired. Review of nursing note for Resident R91 dates December 7, 2023, revealed that the resident experienced a change in condition related to abnormal vital signs. Resident R91 was assessed by the physician who recommended that the resident to be sent out to the hospital for further assessment and evaluation. Resident R91 was discharged to the hospital on December 7, 2023. Review of Resident R71's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plan related to hearing needs and behavioral needs for three of 33 residents reviewed. (Residents R7, R113, R10) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Care plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, indicated that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being; aid in preventing or reducing decline in the resident by focusing on a rehabilitative program . Interview with Resident R7 conducted on January 9, 2024, at 11:14 p.m. revealed that the resident had difficulty understanding the surveyor during the survey screening process. Further interview with the resident, at the time of the observation, revealed that the resident is hard of hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication between the facility and a dialysis provider for two of two dialysis residents reviewed (Residents R138 and R141). Findings include: Review of Resident R138's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including of end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function). Further review of Resident 138's clinical record revealed that the resident has dialysis treatments three times per week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at Dialysis Direct. Dialysis days are Monday, Wednesday & Friday with a pickup time of 9:30 a.m. for a 10:00 a.m. chair time. A review of Resident R138's dialysis communication book revealed that the bottom of the report, to be completed upon return to the facility following dialysis, was not completed on December 31, 2023, or January 3, 2024. The top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R63, and R73). Findings Include: Review of the undated Medication Regimen Review Policy revealed, The consultant pharmacist will review the drug regimen of all residents at least monthly and report any observed irregularities in drug use and other drug therapy recommendations to the director of nursing and attending physician. Further review revealed, The physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing, Resident R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). A review of the medication regimen review completed on September 7, 2023, by the consultant pharmacist, revealed a recommendation to re-evaluate the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater. Findings include: On January 10, 2024, at 09:18 a.m., observed that Employee E30, a Licensed Nurse, administered to Resident R52, Nifedipine ER (Extended Release) Tablet, 24 Hour, 90 milligrans (mg), one tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension (Hypertension is a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high). Also on January 10, 2024, at 9:18 a.m., observed that Employee E30, administered to Resident R52, Potassium Chloride ER Tablet Extended Release 20 MEQ, one tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypokalemia (a lower-than-normal potassium level in the bloodstream. Potassium helps carry electrical signals to cells in the body. It is critical to the proper functioning of nerve and muscles cells, particularly heart muscle cells). On January 10, 2024, at 9:18 a.m., observed that Employee E30, was to crush these Extended-Release tablets,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were stored at the proper temperature in one of two medication refrigerators reviewed. Findings include: Review of CDC guideline on Vaccine Storage and Handling Toolkit, reviewed in January 2023, indicated as follows: Vaccines licensed for refrigerator storage should be stored at 2°C-8°C (36°F-46°F). (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/storage.html). Monitoring vaccine storage equipment and temperatures are daily responsibilities to ensure the viability of your vaccine supply and the safety of your patients. Implementing routine monitoring activities can help you identify temperature excursions quickly and take immediate action to correct them, preventing loss of vaccines and the potential need for revaccination of patients. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/admin/storage/toolkit/storage-handling-toolkit.pdf). On January 12, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. during an observation of the Medication Storage Room of First Floor, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for five of eleven residents reviewed (Residents R5, R1, R3, R2 and R6). Findings include: Review of undated facility policy titled, Food: Preparation, indicated that all foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold holding. Interview with Resident R7 on January 9, 2024, at 11:17 a.m. revealed that food always arrives cold. Interview with Resident R37 on January 11, 2024, at 11:35 a.m. revealed that in the rooms, food is cold. During a group interview, held on January 10, 2024, at 10:08 a.m. with Residents R76, R58, R45. R152, R27, R153, R37, R127, R30, R77, R71, and R10 revealed that food is not appetizing and palatable. Observations during a test tray conducted with Employee E27, Food Service Director (FSD), on January 11, 2024, at 12:43 p.m. revealed that the chicken bacon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy on food brought by family/ visitors reveal that under policy statement Food brought to the facility by visitors and families is permitted. facilities staff will strive to balance resident choice a home like environment within nutritional and safety needs of residents. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation, #7. Food brought by family of visitors that is left with the resident which shown later will be labeled last word in a manner that it is clearly distinguishable from facility prepared food. #a. Non-perishable foods will be stored in a resealable container with tight fitting lids, intact fresh food may be stored without a lid. #b. Perishable foods must be stored in a resealable container. in the refrigerator containers with label over the residence laying the item and the used by date. #8. the nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Finding include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on January 9, 2024, at approximately 9:38 a.m. with Employee E21, Foodservice Director (FSD), which revealed the following: Observations on the receiving area revealed plastics and debris and plastics around the main garbage and receiving area. Further observation revealed three grey colored trashcans were overflowing with trash and opened, which exposed the trash inside to open air. Interview with the FSD on January 9, 2023, at 9:50 a.m. confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement program, Performance Improvement Program plan, facility documentation, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate and maintain an effective quality improvement program with systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events and performance indicators. Findings include: Review of facility Policy under section Policy Statement, the facility shall develop, implement and maintain an on ongoing facility wide data-driven QAPI program that is focused on the outcomes, care and quality of life for our residents. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The objectives of the QAPI program are to: #1. provide a means to the current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life, #2. Provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators, #3. Reinforce and build upon effective systems and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program. Findings include: A review of facility Pest Control policy revised May 2008, states that this facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Observations on January 9, 2024, at 10:25 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed four glue traps for rodents beside the HVAC unit under the window, along the wall, beside the nightstand and under the bed. Interview with Resident R147 revealed that he saw a mouse that morning and that they just run right past the traps and never get stuck in the glue, and he expressed concerns that it is so bad that he was afraid that they would get into his bed. Observations on January 9, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed small flies buzzing around an unopened apple juice container on the overbed table. Observations on January 9, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure its nurse aide staff was receiving in-service training to be proficient and competent and that the training be no less that 12 hours annually for six of six nurse aide staff training information reviewed (E10, E11, E12, E13, E22 & E23). Findings Include: Review of the nurse aide annual training information provided during the survey revealed that there were no training logs to review for nurse aides E10, E22 and E23. Review of the nurse aide annual training information provided during the survey revealed that nurse aides E11, E12 and E13 training logs did not contain any training since January 2023, and did not meet the twelve hours of annual training requirement. An interview with the Director of Nursing on January 12, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. confirmed that these nurse aides did not meet the minimum required hours of training. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a group interview, observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to display proper contact information for the State Survey Agency, including the Hotline number on all three nursing floors (First, Second and Third Floors). Findings include: A group interview was held on January 10, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. with ten alert and oriented residents (Residents R76, R58, R152, R37, R127, R30, R77, R71, R10 and R111) who regularly attend resident council meetings. When asked if they knew how to contact the Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) with a complaint, all residents said no. When asked again if anyone knew how to contact DOH, they all shook their head no, and Resident R111 said that he never saw this number posted, and that he wanted it. Observations of First, Second and Third Floors on January 10, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the State Department of Health contact information was not posted on any of the three nursing floors as required. Interview with the DON on January 10, 2024, at 12:00 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that most recent survey results were accessible to residents on three of three nursing units observed (First, Second and Third Floors). Findings include: Group interview conducted on January 10, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., with alert and oriented Residents R76, R58, R152, R37, R127, R30, R77, R71, R10 and R111 revealed that the residents did not know where the results for the most recent survey from state agency were located. Observations during a tour with the Director of Nursing on January 10, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. revealed that only first floor had a binder of survey results which did not contain any survey results since January 2023. Observations on the Second and Third floors revealed that there were no survey results available for review. The above findings were confirmed by Director of Nursing on January 10, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management 28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 201.29(a) Resident Rights
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain one of three nursing floors in a clean, comfortable, and homelike condition. (Third floor) Findings include: Observations on January 9, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the HVAC unit was open at the top with no vents, the sink in the bathroom just dripped when the hot water was turned on, and wood on the side of the sink was peeling apart, and there was a hole in the wall below the sink. Interview with Resident R43 revealed that the sink has been that way for a long time, and it is frustrating not having hot water to wash up. Observations on January 9, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that neither the hot nor the cold water worked on the sink in the room. According to the daughter of Resident R56 during a family interview on January 9, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., this sink has not worked for months. Further observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that the dresser at bed A had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for one of 7 residents reviewed related to PASRR assessments (Resident R34). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with mental illness or an intellectual disability. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan related to the discontinuation of eteral feeding for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R128). Findings include: Review of Resident R128's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted in the facility, on October 25, 2022. Resident R128's diagnoses included Dysphagia (Dysphagia is a medical term for difficulty swallowing. Dysphagia can be a painful condition), and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (Protein-Calorie Malnutrition describes a wide range of clinical conditions resulting from mild to severe undernutrition). Review of physician order for Resident R128, dated June 27, 2022, indicated an order for Enteral Feed every shift, and it was discontinued on October 26, 2022. Review of physician order for R128, dated October 27, 2023, indicated an order for one time a day, every shift, administer Jevity 1.5 via continuous Feed @ 50ml x8hrs, for total volume 400mL. Check tube placement prior to administration. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a communication device to maintain optimal communication for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Residents R108) The findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Accommodations of Needs revised 2020, indicated that non-English speaking residents will be provided with communication boards or language lines. Interview with Resident R108, on January 10, 2024, at 12:43 p.m. revealed resident spoke to surveyor in Spanish. Review of Resident R108's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), altered mental status, and cognitive communication deficit. Interview with Registered Dietitian, Employee E23, conducted on January 11, 2024, at 1:52 p.m. revealed that Resident R108 only spook Spanish and that it was difficult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician order related to medications administration and hospice services for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R90 and R128). Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R90 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosesof deep vein thrombosis (DVT, A blood clot in a deep vein, usually in the legs), obstructive uropathy (disorder of the urinary tract), and glaucoma (a group of eye conditions that damage the optic nerve). Review of the physician approved medication list revealed the following medications were approved and were to be provided to resident R90 during his stay in the facility: acetaminophen (for pain), apixaban (anticoagulant), dorzolamide (for eye pressure), and finasteride (urinary tract retention medication). Review of Resident R90's medication administration documentation revealed that two of four medications, (dorzolamide and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of clinical records and interviews with resident representatives and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain an appointment with a hearing specialist for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R7). Findings include: Interview with Resident R7 conducted on January 9, 2024, at 11:14 p.m. revealed that the resident had difficulty understanding the surveyor during the survey screening process. Further interview with the resident, at the time of the observation, revealed that the resident is hard of hearing and that she was supposed to receive hearing aids but still had not received them. Review of facility documentation for Resident R7, titled, report of consultation, dated June 14, 2022, revealed that the resident had hearing loss and was a candidate for bilateral hearing aids. Review of documentation titled Audiology Consultation for resident R7, dated November 16, 2022, revealed that the resident required assistive listening device (hearing aid). Further review of facility documentation provided titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weights were monitored for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R8) Findings include: Review facility policy on Weight Assessment and Intervention, under section Policy Statement revealed that the multi-disciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our resident. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed that #3. Any weight change of more than 3 lbs. (pounds) since the last weight will be retaken. The validated weight will be placed in the patient's medical records. #4. The dietitian will review the unit weight record by the 15th of the month to follow individual weight trends overtime. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. #5. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: #a. One month - 5% weight loss is significant,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff had the proper competencies including catheter care, tube feeding care and post dialysis care for four of four licensed nurse training records reviewed (E14, E15, E16 & E17). Findings include: Review of the provided facility policies did not reveal any policy related to nursing competencies. Review of training records provided did not reveal competencies requested including catheter care, tube feeding care and post dialysis care for Employees E14, E15, E16 and E17. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 12, 2024, at 9:05 a.m. confirmed that there was no documentation available to review to show that licensed nursing staff had been evaluated for competency in catheter care, tube feeding care and post dialysis care. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, review of clinical record, interview with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with professional standards for two of 37 residents reviewed. (Resident R18 and Resident R19) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Administering Oral Medication revealed that purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications. Under section Steps in the Procedure, #10 confirm the identity of the resident, #16 allow the resident to swallow oral tablets or capsules at his or her comfortable pace, #21 remain with a resident until all medications have been taken. Review of Resident R19's clinical record revealed that Resident R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident R19's clinical record revealed that Resident R18 had the diagnoses of generalized Idiopathic Epilepsy, Edema, Cerebrovascular Disease, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor infections and antibiotic usage. Findings include: Review of facility policy on surveillance for infection dated September 2017 revealed that under Policy Statement, The infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare-associated infections and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact and potential resident outcome and that may require transmission based precautions and other preventative interventions. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed that #1. The purpose of the surveillance of infection is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and healthcare associated infections to guide appropriate interventions and to prevent future infections, #3. Infections that will be included in routine surveillance include those with A.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the resident rooms, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition. Findings Include: A tour of the first floor of the facility was conducted on January 9, 2024, and January 11, 2024. On January 9, 2024, at 12:16 p.m., and on January 11, 2024, at 1:19 p.m., observations in room [ROOM NUMBER], Bed B, revealed the side enabler of resident bed was unstable and unsteady, and the air-mattress was not blowing up. On January 11, 2024, at 1:19 p.m., the findings were confirmed with a Licensed Nurse, E 29. 28 Pa Code 207.2 (a) Administrator's responsibility
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assure all equipment was effective to provide full visual privacy for each resident in seven of 13 resident rooms observed. (Rooms 235, 226, 233, 228, 236, 238, 232) Findings include: A tour on the second floor conducted on January 9, 2024, at 11:03 a.m. through January 10, 2024, revealed the following concerns: Interview held with resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that she feels exposed. Observations revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] had 7 missing window blind slats on the left side of the window. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a total of six vertical window blind slats were missing throughout the window. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed two vertical window blind slats were missing. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that seven vertical window blind slats were missing on the right side of the window. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed six vertical window blind slats…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that linens were handled by a professional laundering services in order to meet health care industry laundry standards. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled job description of laundry attendant, consists of utilization protective gear, operates computer operated washers, cleaning and sanitizing the work area including the machines, worktables and sorting area, and is responsible to perform laundry activities within a well-established guidelines to ensure that quality of standards and safety guidelines are being met. Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) titled Laundry and Bedding Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities (2003). Contaminated textiles and fabrics often contain high numbers of microorganisms from body substances, including blood, skin, stool, urine, vomitus, and other body tissues and fluids. When textiles are heavily contaminated with potentially infective body substances,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, functional environment for two of three nursing units and in the laundry room. (First floor, Second floor and Laundry room) Finding include: Observation on December 5, 2023 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. revealed the following: -There was no hand soap at the sink in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. -There was a urine spilled through out the bathroom floor and orange juice spilled on the floor by bed B in room [ROOM NUMBER] -The tube feeding formula had spilled on to the floor of bed B in room [ROOM NUMBER]. -There were two stool stains on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER], reported by Resident R2. Interview with Resident R2 on December 5, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. revealed that the floor has still not been cleaned. -The blinds did not close in room [ROOM NUMBER] leaving the residents in beds A and B with limited privacy. -Flies were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] around open food. -Open food and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview with residents and staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident call bell alert systems were functional properly for three residents on two nursing units. (Resident R3, Resident R4, Resident R5) Finds include: Review of facility policy titled Answering the call light dated March 2021 revealed the purpose of this procedure is to ensure a timely response to the resident's requests and needs. Further review of this policy states to be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times. Observation during tour of the facility on December 5, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. revealed that Residents R3 and R4, and R5 had nonfunctioning call bells. Interview with Housekeeper, Employee E3 at time of interview confirmed that these call bells did not function properly. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing Services 28 Pa. Code 210.18(b)(1) Managment
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection for two of ten residents reviewed regarding isolation practices. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (Covid -19)- Resident Exposure, Quarantine and Isolation Dated October 2021, revised May 2023, states Residents will not be cohorted with other residents with confirmed Covid -19 infection unless they are confirmed to have Covid-19 infection through testing and outbreak status warrants cohorting infected residents due to multiple confirmed cases. Further review of this policy states that if cohorting, only residents with the same respiratory pathogen will be housed in the same room. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that Resident R1 had the diagnosis of coronavirus disease. Observation of Resident R1's room on November 2, 2023, at 11:05 a.m. revealed that Resident R1 shared a room with two other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure completed documentation related to catheter care and emptying of catheter drainage bag for one of one resident reviewed with a urinary catheter (Resident R1). Findings include: Observation of Resident conducted on September 14, 2023, at 11:23 a.m. revealed that resident was on a wheelchair, with half full urine bag hanging under the wheelchair covered with privacy bag. Further observation revealed that the tubing had clear light-yellow urine draining. Review of resident's diagnoses revealed diagnoses of but not limited to Urinary Tract Infection, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Hydronephrosis with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Acute kidney Failure, Review of physician's orders revealed an order to perform foley catheter care every shift and as needed with an order date of August 25, 2023, and discontinue date of September 1, 2023. Review of June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023 TAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,431 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $37,431 — penalty dated 2024-09-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395782. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.