Fox Subacute At South Philadelphia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 46.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.94 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.69 to 1.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was kept safe from accidents related to exposed bedframe parts for one of 10 residents reviewed. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who sustained lacerations to the forehead and inside of the mouth as well as bruising to the left eye when the resident's face came into contact with the bed frame during care. Resident R1 required transfer to the hospital. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. (Resident R1) Findings Include:Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Anoxic (resulting from lack of oxygen) brain damage, tracheostomy status (a tube placed into the airway through the neck and into the trachea to assist with breathing), and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-01-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical documentation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during care by not ensuring two staff members were present for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure constituted neglect and resulted in actual harm to Resident R1, who fell during the provision of incontinence care and sustained a fracture of the right humeral head (upper arm bone at the shoulder). This deficiency was identified as past noncompliance.Findings include:Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (area of brain tissue that has died) due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery, acute infarction of intestine, obstructive fluid, Subdural Hematoma, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, Pulmonary Embolism without acute heart pulmonale, need for assistance with personal care, tracheostomy status, Chronic Respiratory Failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's representative was informed of a resident's change of status to make treatment decisions, for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R16). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Resident Rights dated November 18, 2018, revealed that residents and their families or other representatives have the right to be fully informed by a physician of his/her health and medical condition. The facility shall give the resident and family the opportunity to participate in planning the resident's care and medical treatment. Review of Resident R16's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including respiratory failure (not enough oxygen passes from your lungs to your blood) requiring use of a mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that personal privacy was provided during treatment and medication administration for two of 16 residents reviewed (Residents R27 and R28).Finding include: Review of Facility policy on Resident's Rights dated November 18, 2018, revealed that under section Policy Statement: All residents in long term care facilities have rights guaranteed to them under federal and state law. Under section POLICY INTERPRETATION #1. The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. #2. The facility will promote the exercise of rights for each resident including any who face barriers (such as communication problems hearing problems and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. #3. The facility will protect and promote the rights of each resident including each of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed ensure that a person-centered care plan was developed for one of sixteen residents reviewed. (Resident R27)Review facility policy on plan of care and interdisciplinary care conference revealed that under section policy the facility will develop a meaningful plan of care and compliance with state and federal regulatory requirements that meets the individual needs of the resident in order to provide quality of care and the components that are necessary for the quality of life of the individual. Review of Resident R27's clinical record revealed that Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of physician's order dated January 15, 2026, revealed an order for L (left) Elbow cleanse with NSS (normal saline solution), apply Medi honey, cover with wound dressing one time a day. Further review of physician's orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precautions were followed during treatment and medication administration for three of 16 residents reviewed (Residents R8, R28 and R33).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated November 30, 2022, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE [Personal Protective Equipment] beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during specific high contact resident care activities. Continued review revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions may be implemented for residents in the facility when the following the following are present . wounds and/or indwelling medical devices are present (e.g. central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator). Further review revealed that high contact care activities include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of select facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the evaluation of resident's need and use of restraints, including evaluation of the least restrictive measure needed to treat the resident's medical symptom and failed to timely obtain informed consent prior to the use of restraint for one of one sampled residents with restraints. (Residents R5) Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Restraints - revised on September 1, 2016, revealed Physical restraints include, but are not limited to leg restraints, arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties or vests, lap cushions and lap trays the resident cannot remove. To provide guidelines for appropriate use of restraints to prevent injury to the patient or other patients only as necessary. A. An initial assessment will be completed whenever the use of a physical device is considered. 1. Included in the assessment will be a. To determine the need for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observations, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion, received appropriate services to prevent further decline in range of motion and maintain appropriate positioning for two of 13 resident s reviewed. (Resident R26 and Resident R33). Finding Include: Review of physician order for Resident R26 dated May 9, 2024, revealed an order for hand grip splint to be alternated right to left every 4 hours with a schedule of 12 AM, 4AM, 8AM, 12PM, 4PM and 8PM. Review of physician order for Resident R26 dated July 31, 2024, revealed an order for elbow positioning wedges to be applied bilaterally 4 hours then removed 4 hours with a schedule of 12 AM, 4AM, 8AM, 12PM, 4PM and 8PM. Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set- Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R26 dated January 14, 2025, revealed that the resident's range of motion was limited on both sides on both upper and lower extremities. Observation of Resident R26 on February 9, 2025, at 10:20 a.m. revealed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate assistance was provided to prevent a fall for one of two sampled residents reviewed for falls (Resident R33). This deficiency was identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of Resident R33's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated November 14, 2024, revealed Resident R33 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnosis that included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, anoxic brain damage (brain deprived of oxygen), and muscle wasting and atrophy. Further review of Resident R33's MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident R33 was dependent (helper does all the effort) for all activities. Resident R33 required assistance of two or more helpers for bed mobility (how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for two of two sampled residents with urinary catheters reviewed (Residents R4, and R39). Findings include: Review of Resident R4's clinical record revealed Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a diagnosis that included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, anoxic brain damage (complete lack of oxygen to the brain), and retention of urine. Observation on February 10, 2024 at 12:22 p.m. revealed Resident R4's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag (a flexible catheter used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage collection bag) lying flat on floor on the right side of Resident R4's bed. Interview on February 10, 2025 at 12:26 p.m. with Employee E5, Nurse Aide, confirmed Resident R4's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag should not be on the floor. Review of Resident R39's clinical record revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medication vials upon opening and failed to discard expired medication for two of three medication carts (Medication Cart Four and Medication Cart Five) and and two of two medication rooms (Room Two). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Storage of Medication, dated 2016, revealed insulin products should be stored in the refrigerator until opened. Note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first used. The opened insulin vial may be stored in refrigerator or at room temperature. Outdated, contaminated, discontinued, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Observation conducted on February 11, 2025 at 11:43 a.m. in medication storage Room Two revealed two tuberculin (TB) vials (used to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food and Nutritional Services Administration and Requirement dated September 1, 2016, revealed Refrigerators freezers and dry storage areas will be checked for temperature twice daily (at opening and closing times) and temperature will be recorded on the log, Review of facility policy Kitchen Dishwasher temperature dated September 1, 2016, revealed, All temperatures are to be recorded on the dishwasher temperature log once per meal service, An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on February 9, 2025, at 12:00 a.m. with Employee E13, Food Service Manager, which revealed the following: The facility dish machine temperature log for February 2025, revealed that the temperature recording was available only up to February 3, 2025. There was no temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,735 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,735 — penalty dated 2026-01-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $842K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA