No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Independence Rehab and Nursing

600 W Cheltenham Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19126 · Non profit - Corporation · 255 certified beds · (215) 927-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20265 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$353,465 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $353,465 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
921 W Cheltenham Ave · (215) 635-4902 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
416 Oak Lane Rd · (215) 444-7525 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
101 Cheltenham Ave · (215) 782-3880 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.9%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.2%25.5%21.2%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.4%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.9%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.501.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.981.181.80better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.9%CMS range 22.9–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.0–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.1–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.601.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 255 beds and averages 232.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy and information of alcohol-based hand sanitizer, it was determined the facility failed to adequately supervise and monitor Resident R1. This failure resulted in Resident R1 obtaining and ingesting alcohol-based hand sanitizer on three separate dates resulting in an Immediate jeopardy situation for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Accident & Injury Prevention and Response Policy dated January 1, 2026, indicated that the purpose of the policy was to ensure that all residents of the facility are protected from avoidable accidents and injuries through proactive assessment, environmental safety, staff training, and timely response. Review of the Safety Data Sheet for the ProCure Alcohol Gel Hand Sanitizer 70% indicated the chemical name as Ethyl Alcohol with 70-75% concentration. The first aide measure to follow if ingested stated to contact a physician or a poison control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident who was at risk for elopement and failed to ensure that windows were secure on the unit. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R1, who exited the building through a third floor window and sustained serious injuries, including bilateral lower extremity fractures and a fracture of the third lumbar spine vertebra for one of three residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Elopements and Wandering Residents, with a revision date of April 23, 2024, indicated that the facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Continued review of the policy indicated that residents will be assessed for risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely assess and consistently provide recommended and/or prescribed treatment and services, to prevent new wound development, promote healing and prevent worsening of existing wounds. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who developed new and worsening wounds on the right clavicle and neck which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy Situation for one resident of four clinical records reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address areas of risk. The American College of Physicians [ACP] is a national organization of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records, review of facility policy and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident R92 was free from neglect related to a significant medication error. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R92 who received 10 units of a fast-acting insulin that was intended for another resident and without proper monitoring following the administration of the insulin for one of 40 residents reviewed. (Resident 92). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Freedom from Abuse Neglect & Exploitation implementation date November 28, 2017, revealed The purpose of this procedure is to comply with reporting of crimes that may occur at the facility in accordance with section 1150B of the elder Justice Act (EJA). To protect elders with diminished capacity while maximizing their autonomy and help elders recognize the right to be free of abuse, neglect and exploitation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of medication errors for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident R92). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R92 who was administered 10 units of a fast- acting insulin medication that was intended for another resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Administering Medications date May 2016, revealed Medication are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufactures' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by person legally authorized to do so, Personnel authorized to administer medication do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. It further states under bulletin 10. Resident are identified before medication is administered using at least two resident identifiers. Methods of identification may include a. check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of information submitted by the facility, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of abuse for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1. Resident R1 was involved in a physical altercation with a staff member, during which the staff member punched Resident R1 in the face. A reasonable person would determine that a staff member striking a resident with moderate cognitive impairment caused actual harm. Due to the resident's cognitive limitations and dependence on staff for care and protection, the impact of the incident is magnified and places the resident at risk for ongoing psychological trauma. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Freedom from Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, with a revision date of September 2025, indicated the facility must provide a safe resident environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with staff, review of clinical records, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to protect Resident R112 from Resident R46 who had a history of verbal aggression towards Resident R112. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R112 who sustained a closed head injury and a fractured right finger when Resident R46 became physically violent towards Resident R112 for two of 33 resident records reviewed. (Resident R112 and Resident R46) Findings include: Review of Resident R46's quarterly MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set, assessment tool used to evaluate the functional abilities and cognitive status of a resident) dated July 16, 2024, revealed the resident was alert and oriented, capable of making independent decisions, diagnosed with Epilepsy, (chronic brain disorder that causes seizures) and Hemiplegia (one sided weakness) affecting the right dominate side. The resident was assessed as independent in all activities of daily living (ADL), including walking, and transferring and was continent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse involving Residents R1 and R2 was properly and timely reported to law enforcement for 2 of 8 records reviewed (Resident R1, R2).Findings include: Review of an incident submitted to the State Survey Agency on June 2, 2026, revealed that on 05/25/2026 at approximately 2:25p.m. nursing staff reported an alleged inappropriate resident encounter involving Resident R1, a male resident and Resident R2, a female resident. The incident reportedly occurred in Resident R1's room located on the 3rd floor. Resident R2 resided on the 1st floor. The allegation was reported by a staff member who entered the room to retrieve lunch trays and observed both residents in bed unclothed. Upon questioning, both residents denied engaging in sexual intercourse or any sexual activity and stated they were just talking. Both residents subsequently dressed independently. Nursing assessment was initiated immediately following the report. Vital signs for both residents were obtained and noted to be stable.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food at safe temperatures during meal service one of four nursing units. (4th floor)Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Healthcare Service Group, Inc. Food: Preparation, last revised February 2026, revealed under Procedure #4 that the Dining Services Director/Cook(s) will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize the amount of time that food items are exposed to temperatures greater than 41 F and/or less than 135 F, or per state regulations.On June 1, 2026, at 10:01 a.m., an interview with Resident R1 revealed that the food is cold.On June 1, 2026, at 10:49 a.m., an interview with Resident R2 revealed that the food is sometimes cold.On June 1, 2026, at 10:55 a.m., an interview with Resident R3 revealed that the food is bad-everything, temperatures cold.On June 1, 2026, at 11:31 a.m., the Dietary Director, Employee E8, and the surveyor exited the kitchen and followed the food truck to the elevator. Employee, E8 reported that there are only two elevators in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not provide a safe and homelike environment related to the condition and functionality of resident sinks for four out of nine-bathroom sinks. (First-floor nursing unit).Findings Include:On April 27, 2026, at 9:27 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director, Employee R3, and the Director of Nursing, Employee E2, who confirmed the following observations:room [ROOM NUMBER] had a sink with slow water drainage.room [ROOM NUMBER] had a hole by the Bed B below the windowOn April 27, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., during an interview, Resident R1 reported that the bathroom sink sometimes does not shut off properly and that both faucet knobs must be aligned in order for the water to be turned off.On April 27, 2026, at 10:46 a.m. observations were conducted with the Administrator, Employee E1 and revealed the following:room [ROOM NUMBER]: No light in the bathroomroom [ROOM NUMBER]: Sink had slow drainage of waterroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility measurements, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms provided at least 80 square feet of usable living space per resident for multi-occupancy rooms, excluding toilets, bath areas, closets, lockers, wardrobes, alcoves, and vestibules, for two of two rooms reviewed (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]).Findings Include:A review of the facility policy titled Room Square Footage, last revised November 1, 2025, revealed under section 4.2 that semi-private resident rooms shall provide a minimum of 80 square feet of usable floor space per resident.On April 27, 2026, at 9:27 a.m. observations and measurements were conducted with the maintenance director, Employee R3 and Director of Nursing, E2 which revealed:room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B provided (9 feet 4 inches x 7 feet) 65.8 square feetroom [ROOM NUMBER] bed C provided (9 feet 4 inches x 7 feet) 65.8 square feetroom [ROOM NUMBER] bed A revealed (9 feet 5 inches x 6 feet 5 inches) 61.75 square feetroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based clinical record reviews, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined for three of eleven residents reviewed that the administrative staff failed to conduct and complete a thorough investigation into an incident of physical altercation between two residents (Resident R1 and Resident R2) and a physical altercation between Resident R1 and nursing staff member (Employee E7).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled accidents and incidents investigation and reporting dated July 2017 revealed that all accidents and incidents involving residents, employees, visitors and vendors occurring on the premises were to be investigated and reported to the administrator. The policy indicated that the nursing supervisor, charge nurse or department director was to promptly initiate and document the investigation of the accident or incident. The policy indicated that the following data was to be included in the documented investigation report: date and time of the incident, nature of the injury, circumstances surrounding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions following prior elopement behavior and failed to revise the care plan to reflect newly identified elopement risk and escalating behavioral for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Leave of Absence (LOA) Policy indicated that a Leave of Absence is a temporary period when a resident leaves the facility with the expectation of returning. The policy requires staff to ensure the resident is clinically stable prior to departure, obtain a signed LOA form, document the date and time of departure, and provide any necessary instructions. Upon the resident's return, staff are required to document the time of return, complete a nursing assessment, and update the care plan if indicated. The policy also states that if a resident does not return as expected, staff must attempt to contact the responsible party and take additional steps, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 sampled resident identified as being at risk for elopement and failed to implement interventions following prior elopement behavior. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility's admission Agreement indicated that residents may temporarily leave the facility on a Leave of Absence or pass in accordance with facility policies and procedures. The agreement states that the resident or legal representative assumes responsibility for the resident while the resident is away from the facility and releases the facility, its owners, directors, officers, and employees from liability for injury, illness, or decline in condition that may occur during the absence. The agreement also indicates that residents leaving on pass must follow facility requirements, which may include obtaining a physician's order for medications and medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with their requested foods of preferences for five of seven residents interviewed (Residents R3, R4, R5, R6 and R9). Findings include: Interview with Resident R3 on February 18, 2026, at 12:05 p.m. revealed that she often receives foods that she told them she does not like. Interview with Resident R4 on February 18, 2026, at 12:08 p.m. revealed that she often receives foods that she told them she does not like, but that she eats them because she is so hungry. Observation of her plate from lunch revealed that she had eaten everything on the plate. When asked if she got the ham, broccoli and mashed potatoes, she said that the did and that she really does not like ham. She said that she spoke to the dietitian and is supposed to be getting double portions but never does. She is concerned about losing weight. Further observation of her meal ticket revealed no items were listed as double portions. Interview with Resident R4 on February 18, 2026, at 12:11 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, documentation and clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all allegations of suspected abuse were reported immediately, as required, to the Department of Health for two of three allegations reviewed (Resident R2 and R10). Findings include: Review of undated facility policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revealed that the facility will have written procedures that include: Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. Review of the grievance for Resident R10 submitted on February 7, 2026, for an ongoing alleged incident of verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident R2) was properly assessed by nursing staff and failed to ensure that 2 residents received medications according to physician orders (Resident R5 and R6). Findings include:Review of the January 2026 physician orders for Resident R2 included the following diagnosis: epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures); depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest); post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event - either being part of it or witnessing it); adjustment disorder (excessive reactions to stress that involve negative thoughts, strong emotions and changes in behavior); anxiety (frequent intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations, hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high).During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a safe, clean and homelike condition on two of four nursing units (1st floor [NAME] Unit and 4rth floor nursing unit). Findings: A review of the facility policy titled Policy Number: RR1.01 revised 09/2025 stated under bulletin 3. gg. Section p.8 F584 Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment- 1. Right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely. 2. Housekeeping and maintenance services that maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior 3. Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition 4. Private closet space in each resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas, comfortable and safe temperatures levels (71F-81F), and maintenance of comfortable sound levels. On January 21, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., an observation on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical record regarding the consumption of a meal for 1 out of 3 residents observed (Resident R5).Findings include:Review of the January 2025 physician orders for Resident R5 included the following diagnosis: kidney failure (a condition in which one or both of your kidneys no longer work on their own); osteoporosis; psychosis (the term for a collection of symptoms that happen when a person has trouble telling the difference between what's real and what's not), and post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event - either being part of it or witnessing it).Review of a physician's order for Resident R5 with an order date of August 25, 2022 and monthly thereafter included an order for the resident to have a fortified cereal one time a day during her breakfast meal for the additional calories and protein intake. Fortified Cereal one time a day for additional kcal and protein intake. With breakfast. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assist and initiate a discharge plan for a resident who requested to be discharge from the facility for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of the facility policy title Discharges dated October 1, 2025, revealed that the residents may not be discharged unless specific criteria are met and at the facility must provide written notice, physician documentation, and coordinate discharge planning with social services, nursing, MDS (resident assessment of care needs), and therapy. The policy requires a discharge notice include the reason for discharge, effective date, appeal rights, and discharge location, and that a post discharge plan of care be developed. Review of Resident R1's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed that this resident was admitted into the facility on October 8, 2025. Resident R1 was assessed with a BIMS (Brief interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interview with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were explained their resident rights for four of eleven residents reviewed. (R1, R76, R120, and R178). Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights undated, reads Policy: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. The facility will also provide the resident with prompt notice (if any) of changes in any State or Federal laws relating to resident rights or facility rules during the resident's stay in the facility. Receipt of any such information must be acknowledged in writing. Further review of the Resident Rights policy revealed, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: A posting of names, addresses and phone numbers of all pertinent state client advocacy groups will be available in the facility.During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the ability to file grievances anonymously for four out of four nursing units reviewed.Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Grievance Policy dated November 2016 states, The facilities established grievance policy includes: Notifying the resident individually or through posting of the right to file grievances orally or in writing, the right to file grievances anonymously, the contact information of the grievance official, a reasonable expected time frame for completing review of the grievance, the right to obtain a written decision, the contact of independent entities to whom grievances may be filed (state agency, quality improvement or, state survey agency, state LTC ombudsman). Further review of the facility policy states, The facility Grievance Office is the Social Worker, and is responsible for: Overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances to conclusion, leading any necessary investigations, maintaining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0646 — pattern
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not notify the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority, promptly after a significant change in the mental condition for three of thirty-three residents reviewed. (R4, R53, R56).Findings Include: Review of Resident R4's psychiatry note from September 2, 2025 stated, [Resident R4] with noted history of schizoaffective disorder in electronic health records system and past psychology note. Resident R4 does not answer appropriately assessment questions and is a poor historian. [Resident R4] was previously prescribed Haldol, but medication was discontinued in 2024, after discontinuation, pt displayed no signs of psychosis. [Resident R4's] medical record includes no documentation confirming schizoaffective diagnosis. This patient does not meet DSM-5 criteria for schizoaffective please remove diagnosis. Continued review of the resident's record revealed no further communication with the state mental health authority. Review of Resident R53's psychiatry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered care plan was developed related to oxygen and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R11 and Resident R19) Review of facility's undated policy on Comprehensive Care Plan revealed that under section Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Section Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely pressure ulcer treatment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R13). Review of Resident R13's clinical record revealed that Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Hypertension (high blood pressure), Rheumatoid Arthritis (isa chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects the joints), Hypothyroidism (condition due to deficiency in the thyroid hormone resulting in decreased body metabolism).Review of Resident R13's MDS (minimum data set a federally required resident assessment completed at a specific interval) dated June 26, 2025, revealed that section GG0130. Self-Care C. Toileting hygiene: was coded has dependentant.Review of nurse's aide task revealed that for toileting and hygiene Resident R13 was dependent to maximum assist.Review of Resident R13's nursing note dated July 25, 2025, reveal that Nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hot beverages were served at a safe temperature during a resident activity in one of four floors. (Second floor dining room) Findings include:The FDA, Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the American Burn Association all warn against serving beverages at temperatures above 150 F, as liquids at or above this level can cause severe burns within seconds. According to these organizations, a serious burn can occur in just one second when a beverage is served at 160 F. To minimize the risk of scalding injuries, best practices recommend that hot beverages be served at temperatures between 130 F and 160 F.Review of The American Burn Association https://ameriburn.org, revealed at 140 degrees Fahrenheit, serious burns can occur in about five seconds and a 160 degrees Fahrenheit it can happen in just one second, this underscores how quickly severe burns can occur from hot liquidsObservation on n September 15, 2025, at approximately 11:00 AM, during a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure that nurse aides received annual performance evaluations to assess competency and performance, as required. Findings Include: An interview was held on September 17, 2025 at 2:45 p.m. with Employee E1 the Nursing Home Administrator. Employee E1 when asked to provide evidence nurse aides were evaluated at least every 12 months. Employee E1 stated, we don't have any nurse aide evaluations. I thought that they needed the required trainings only. Based on the information above, the facility could not provide any nurse aide evaluations during the past 12 months. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary equipment to maintain hot foods remain in functional capacity. Findings include: Observations of the food and nutrition services department on September 15, 2025 at 11:30 a.m., in the presence of the food service director, Employee E7, revealed that the plate warmer was not equipped with a lid/cover that was necessary to contain heat. This piece of foodservice equipment was designed to warm/heat the ceramic plates that were used for plating and serving meals to the residents. The ceramic plates were not hot to touch. Additional observations of the food and nutrition services department on September 15, 2025, revealed that the dietary operation was not using a complete thermal system for maintaining hot foods (meals) during transportation and delivery to the nursing units from the main kitchen. Interview with the Director of Dietary Services at 11:30 a.m., on September 15, 2025, revealed that the thermal pellet base charger and thermal pellet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing effectively and efficiently implemented resources to management incidents of resident abuse and failed to ensure that behavior management resources were implemented for one of seven sampled residents (Residents R148) Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled accident and incident-investigation, and reporting dated July 2017 revealed that all accidents and incidents involving residents occurring on the premises were to be investigated and reported to administration. The nursing supervisor was required to document and investigate the accident and incident. The report was to contain the circumstances surrounding the accident and incident, names of all parties involved such as witnesses and their accounts of the accident or incident, residents' statements of the event, the physician's response to the event was to be documented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and maintain an accurate, comprehensive facility-wide assessment. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Facility Assessment (dated 2025) revealed that the facility is required to complete and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both routine operations and emergencies. The policy identifies that the facility assessment must include, at a minimum:- The resident population, including number, facility capacity, and care needs using data-driven methods that reflect disease types, physical and behavioral health needs, cognitive impairments, and acuity levels;- Physical environment, equipment, services, and cultural/religious factors that may affect care.- Facility resources including staffing, equipment, therapy, pharmacy, behavioral health services, and all contracted services.- Responsibility for completion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are treated with dignity and respect for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R183)Findings include: Review of Resident R 183's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool for all residents) dated September 4, 2025, revealed that Resident R183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), asthma (condition that causes the airways to swell, narrow and fill with mucus), and bipolar disorder (mental condition that causes extreme mood swings). The residents' cognitive status, as measured by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), yielded a score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on September 16, 2025, at 08:30 a.m. on the second-floor nursing unit revealed Licensed Nurse, Employee E12 administering medications to Resident R183. Licensed nurse, Employee E12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, staff interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of 33 residents reviewed was assessed to self-administered medications. (Resident R77)Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Self-Administration revealed that residents are not permitted to retain or self-administer medications in their rooms unless the primary physician writes an order authorizing self-administration and the interdisciplinary team determines the resident is capable of doing so safely. An evaluation of the resident's ability to self-administer must be conducted and documented. The physician's order must be signed and dated prior to self-administration. Self-administration must be reflected in the resident's care plan and reviewed at least quarterly or upon any clinical change in the resident's status.Review of Resident R 77's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federal mandated assessment tool for all residents) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure to maintain privacy for resident's clinical records during medication administration and incontinence care for two of thirty-one residents observed (Resident R168 and R207). Findings include:Review of undated facility policy title HIPAA Security Measures revealed that under section Policy: It is the facility's policy to implement reasonable and appropriate measures to protect and maintain the confidentiality integrity and availability of resident's identifiable information and or records that are in electronic format. Under section Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidance #1. Facility leadership will ensure the implementation of policies and procedures to prevent detect contain and correct any security violations. #3. Only appropriate employees will have access to electronic protected health information. #8. Physical safeguards will be implemented that limit physical access to its electronic information systems and the facility of facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable environment in a manner that promotes a homelike atmosphere for residents for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R62) and on one of four nursing floors. (Third floor)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights undated states that the resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. Further review of the policy states that residents have the right to a 8. Safe environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. Observations conducted during a tour of the Third Floor on September 15, 2025 at 9:40 a.m. revealed the following: At 10:01 a.m. the Third-floor high side had foul odors of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, reviews of facility policies and procedures, interview with residents and staff, reviews of facility documentation and clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that allegations of verbal abuse, mental abuse and physical abuse were reported promptly and thoroughly investigated for three of thirty-one residents reviewed. (Resident R2, Resident R148, Resident R211 and Resident R45) Findings include:A review of the undated policy titled abuse, neglect and exploitation revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to provide protection for each resident to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of property.The policy indicated that alleged allegations of abuse (psychological, neglect for the provision of safe care for residents, verbal abuse, misappropriation of property and sudden changes in behaviors such as fear of a person) would be thoroughly investigated immediately. All alleged violations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility documents, job descriptions and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a qualified staff performs a wound assessment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R13)Review facility job description for licensed nursing staff revealed Job summary qualifications responsibilities duties and tasks of a charged nurse. Further review of the facility's job description for a charged nurse revealed that there was no specific job description for a registered nurse and there was no specific job description for a licensed practical nurse.Review of Resident R13's clinical record revealed that Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Hypertension, Rheumatoid Arthritis, HypothyroidismReview of Resident R13's skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident was at risk for skin breakdown with a score of 17.Further section G (Additional observation) of Resident R13's skin assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the physical environment of the building on the first floor, reviews of the pest control operators reports and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program. Findings include:Observations of the physical environment of the facility revealed that the food and nutrition department was located on the first floor (ground floor) of the building. Further observations revealed that the trash and refuse area for the entire building was located through the double doorway in the back hallway that was adjacent to the main kitchen and dry food storage area. Observations of the double doors leading directly outside the building and into a driveway where the trash and garbage disposal system (dumpster unit) was held, revealed that these doors did not seal upon closing. A two-inch void was visible between the doors. The gap provided easy access for common household pests and rodents (mice, flies, roaches) to enter the building on the first floor. A review of the pest control operator's reports for September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medication label was accurate for one of (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of Resident R3's April 2026 physican orders revealed an order dated March 19, 2025, for Potassium Chloride Liquid 20 MEQ/15ML (10%), Give 20 mEq via PEG-Tube one time a day for Hypokalemia (low Potassium Levels) Observation conducted of the label on the medication for Potassium Chloride revealed Potassium Chloride Liquid 20 MEQ/7.5 ML. On April 28, 2025, at 10:31 a.m., interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the Pharmacy wrongly labelled the dose of Potassium Chloride Liquid 20 MEQ/15ML (10%), for R3 as to administer 7.5 ML, instead of 15 ML. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with residents and staff, reviews of policies and procedures and food committee meeting minutes, it was determined that for eight of nine residents reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that suitable and nourishing snacks were provided for the residents who wanted to eat at non-traditional times, outside of the scheduled meal service schedule. (Residents R111, R23, R476, R95, R145, R133, R162 and R167). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled the serving of between meal and bedtime snacks dated September, 2010 revealed that it was the facility's responsibility to provide each resident with adequate nutrition. The policy indicated that bedtime snacks were to be placed on the overbed table or serving area for each resident. Nursing staff were responsible for positioning all residents so that the bedtime snack was easily reachable. Each resident was to be placed in upright position. All residents were to receive assistance with eating their bedtime snacks (foods and beverages) as necessary, by the nursing staff. A group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Ware washing, revised February 2023 indicated that the dining services staff will be knowledgeable in the proper technique for processing dirty dishware through the dish machine, and proper handling of sanitized dishware. An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on December 16, 2024, at 9:38 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E11. Interview with Employee E11, revealed that the facility dish machine is operating as a low temperature machine, primarily relying on chemical sanitation. Observations at 8:45 a.m. revealed dietary staff, Employee E13 and Employee E14, were starting the dishwasher to clean dirty dishware. Employee 13 and Employee 14 completed two loads of dirty dishes and stored them to dry. Further observations revealed that a test load of dishes was not conducted and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy,and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan related to Resident R46's diagnosis of physical aggression, paranoia, insomnia and Resident R170 needing oxygen therapy for two of 33 resident records reviewed Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, dated November 2019, states, It is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R46's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to evaluate the functional abilities and cognitive status of a resident) dated July 16, 2024, revealed the resident was alert and oriented capable of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff, and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a failure to conduct routine testing to verify therapeudic levels of a seizure medication. The facility failed to clarify the orders when a medication for epilepsy was decreased in error, and failed to inform the physician of a recommended psychotropic dose increase for one of 33 resident records reviewed. (Resident R46 ) Findings included: Review of the facility's policy, Medication and Treatment Orders revised October 2016 states, Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing . Review of Resident R46's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to evaluate the functional abilities and cognitive status of a resident) dated July 16, 2024, revealed the resident was alert and oriented capable of making independent decisions, diagnosed with epilepsy, (a chronic brain disorder that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited range of motion received treatment and services to maintain or improve range of motion/mobility for two of 36 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident R7 and Resident R37). Findings include: Observation conducted during the tour of the second-floor unit on December 16, 2024, at 9:34 am revealed that Resident R7 was in bed with his left arm in a fixed position on his chest. Review of Resident R7's clinical record revealed that Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Paraplegia, Multiple Sclerosis, Acquired Absence of Right and Left Leg, Muscle Weakness, Contractures of Muscles Multiple Sites. Review of Resident R7's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally required assessment completed at a specific interval) dated October 7, 2024 section GG0115…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, observation, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment was free of accident hazards, and failed to ensure that hazardous material were not accessible to a resident in one nursing unit of one of three nursing units. (Third floor) Findings include: Review of Resident R575's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis' including opioid dependence with withdraw, other psychoactive substance dependence, homicidal ideations, nicotine dependence with withdrawal, homelessness, and suicide attempt. Review of MDS (minimum data set, assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R575 dated December 11, 2024, revealed that the Resident R 575 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 which indicated the cognitive status of the resident was intact. Review of hospital record for Resident R 575 dated November 7, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication were administered with adequate indications for use and monitoring for two of 33 resident clinical records reviewed (Resident R46 and R83). Findings include: A review of the policy titled antipsychotic medication use dated December 2016 revealed that the antipsychotic medications would be prescribed by the physican at the lowest possible dosage for the shorest period of time. The policy also indicated that psychotropic medications were to be evaluated by the physician for gradual dose reduction routinely. The policy said that residents would only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated. The policy indicated that the need to continue as needed orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days required that the physician document the rationale for the extended order. Review of Resident R46's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a laboratory study as ordered by the physician for one of 33 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R158) Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R158 revealed a diagnosis of obesity (overweight with excess body fat). Resident R158 was 68 inches in height and weighed 231 pounds indicating a weight of 25% above the ideal body weight of 154 +/- 10%. Clinical record review for Resident R158 revealed a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] that indicated that this resident was at high risk for pressure sore development and had moisture associated skin damage. Clinical record review for November 13 and 15, 2024 revealed that the physician had ordered laboratory studies of the blood to review the metabolism of albumin (a blood test to determine nutritional deficiencies and measure liver and kidney function) and thyroid (a gland that controls metabolism which effects how your body uses energy, regulates body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records, it was determined this facility failed to establish and maintain enhanced barrier precautions for one resident of eight resident reviewed (Resident R15). Findings include: Review of the CDC Center for Disease Control and Prevention title enhanced barrier precaution and skilled nursing facilities dated November of 2022, revealed that enhanced barrier precautions (EBPS) in addition to standard precautions, are utilized to prevent the spread of multi drug resistant organisms to residents. Enhanced barrier precautions employees targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Gloves and gowns are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity as opposed to before entering the room. All protective equipment is changed before caring for another resident. Example of high contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility regarding the elopement of one of three residents reviewed.(Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated, The Administator is responsible for planning and is accountable for all activities and departments of the center subject to rules and regulations promulgated by government agencies to ensure proper healthcare services to residents. The Administrator administers, directs and coordinates all activities of the center to assure that the highest degree of quality of care is consistently provided to the residents of the facility. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The Director of Nursing is responsible for administration of nursing service in the nursing center. He/she directs, plan and coordinates service activities of professional nursing and auxiliary nursing personnel in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of clinical records and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice related to medication administration for one out 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the policy Medication Administration, dated 05/16 indicated that for residents who are not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR is flagged. After completion of the medication pass, the nurse returns to the missed resident to administer the medication. The policy also indicated that the resident is always observed after administration to ensure that the does was completely ingested. Continued review of the policy indicated that topical medications used in treatments are listed on the treatment administration record (TAR). Review of the April 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of St. Elevation myocardial infarction (a type of heart attack); heart failure (when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) encephalopathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of clinical record and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed maintain complete and accurate clinical records regarding an elopement event for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Documentation in Medical Record dated April 23, 2024 indicated that resident medical records shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate and timely documentation. Review of the April 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of St- Elevation myocardial infarction (a type of heart attack that affects the lower chambers of the heart); heart failure (when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) encephalopathy (a general term describing a disease that affects the function or structure of an individual's brain), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by false beliefs that conflict with reality,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was informed of and allowed to participate in decisions regarding the resident's care and treatment for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 29, 2924, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of anxiety and depression. Interview on April 18, 2024, at 12:27 p.m. with Resident R1 revealed the resident recently missed doses of Trazodone, a medication used to help the resident sleep. Resident R1 reported that nursing staff told him the medication was discontinued by the physician but was unable to explain why. Further interview with Resident R1 revealed poor sleep during the days Trazodone was not provided. Continued interview on April 18, 2024, at 12:27 p.m. with Resident R1 revealed the physician did not inform the resident of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The Policy: Food Storage: Cold Foods, updated February 2023, states, All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on March 25, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director, FSD, which revealed the following: Observation in the corridor between the receiving door to the outside and the kitchen was very dusty and dirty with visible dirt and debris on the floor. Observation in the dry storage room revealed a pan rack with a reddish substance splashed over the rack, and the floor littered with paper, straws, packets and dust, and there was less than the required 18 between boxes (Dart Styrofoam cups, Steamtable Pan Lids, Latex Gloves) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for four of 36 residents reviewed (Resident R131, R37, R42 and R123). Findings Include: Review of the undated Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements Policy revealed, Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for each skilled nursing resident at least monthly, communicate to responsible prescriber, the facility's medical director and the director of nursing potential or actual problems detected, and other findings related to medication therapy orders at least monthly, review and follow-up to previous month's pharmacy recommendations with the nursing care center staff. Review of Resident R131's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system with symptoms including muscle weakness, spasticity and paralysis),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation related to tuberculosis testing for three of three residents reviewed (Resident R480, R479, R134). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R480 revealed an admitting diagnosis of chronic kidney disease on March 8, 2024. Continued review of clinical record revealed an order for TB skin test per protocol. Screening #1 to be administered within the first 24 hours of admission on March 8, 2024. Review of Resident R480's March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed code 1 indicated for this administration. When looking at the key it was revealed that code 1 is absent from home without medication. Continued review of clinical record revealed an order for TB skin test per protocol. Step #2 per protocol on March 15, 2024. MAR revealed code 1 indicated for this administration. When looking at the key it was revealed that code 1 is absent from home without medication. Further review of MAR revealed an order for TB skin test per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of four dialysis residents reviewed (Resident R148). Findings include: Review of Resident R148's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and that Resident R148 had diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). Review of Resident R148's physician order, dated February 15, 2024, revealed Revealed that Resident R148 receive dialysis treatment at an outpatient dialysis facility on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of Resident R148's Hemodialysis Communication Record revealed that on, March 1, 2024 and March 4, 2024 it was lacking information on Pre-Weight, Post- Weight, Pre-Blood Pressure, Post-Blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient dietary personnel to complete essential job functions, related to meals being served late. Findings include: Observations in the main kitchen on March 25, 2024, at 10:50 a.m. revealed the stacks of dirty dishes and tray delivery carts full of trays with dirty dishware that still had to be unloaded, scrapped, stacked, racked, rinsed and run through the dish machine. After the dishes were cleaned, they needed to be stacked in the plate warmers, trays after air drying had to be stacked and preset for the lunch meal, the silverware had to be rinsed, washed, sorted, air dried and set up on the lunch trays. Interview with on March 25, 2024, at 1:08 p.m. with Licensed nurse, Employee E10, confirmed that the lunch trays were late, that they are usually delivered much earlier. Interview with on March 25, 2024, at 1:10 p.m. with Resident R82 revealed that she had not received her tray yet, that it very late for lunch. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, related with linen washing and processing, in one of one laundry room in the facility. (laundry room) Findings include: Observation at the laundry room of the facility, on March 28, 2024, at 12:14 p.m., revealed that two Laundry Aides, Employees E15 and E16, were processing and folding clean linens for the use of residents by holding the linens letting it to touch the Laundry Aides' personal clothing. It was also observed that while folding the washed and dried linens for the use of residents, the clean linens were in close contact with Employee E15's beard. At the time of the finding interviewed with Employees E15 and E16, confirmed that the linen should have been folded without letting it touch the employee's clothing to prevent contamination and to maintain infection control. 28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of employee job description, clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a skin assessment according to professional standards of nursing practice. (Employee E4) Findings Include: Review of job description for Unit Manager, revealed that Unit Manager will oversee the medical and personal care of residents and supervise the nurses and other caregivers who interact with the residents on a daily basis in accordance with state and federal regulations to promote high quality of care and service. Responsibilities: Ensures complete and prompt reporting of incidents with follow-up as necessary to Administrator and Director of Nursing. Oversee resident care to promote the highest level of physical, mental and psychosocial functioning possible for assigned unit. Ensures that significant changes in resident condition are communicated to the physician, family or responsible party. Makes daily rounds on unit to ensure resident care needs and environmental standards are met, this includes monitoring of dining rooms meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one of four clinical records reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Guidelines for Preventing Health-Care--Associated Pneumonia, 2003, Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee recommendations revealed that, Prevention of Person-to-Person Transmission of Bacteria 1. Standard Precautions a. Hand hygiene: Decontaminate hands by washing them with either antimicrobial soap and water or with nonantimicrobial soap and water (if hands are visibly dirty or contaminated with proteinaceous material or are soiled with blood or body fluids) or by using an alcohol-based waterless antiseptic agent (e.g., hand rub) if hands are not visibly soiled after contact with mucous membranes, respiratory secretions, or objects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policy, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff possessed appropriate competencies for tracheostomy care for one of one employee record reviewed. (Employee E5). Findings Include: Review of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Guidelines for Preventing Health-Care--Associated Pneumonia, 2003, Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee recommendations revealed that, Prevention of Person-to-Person Transmission of Bacteria 1. Standard Precautions a. Hand hygiene: Decontaminate hands by washing them with either antimicrobial soap and water or with nonantimicrobial soap and water (if hands are visibly dirty or contaminated with proteinaceous material or are soiled with blood or body fluids) or by using an alcohol-based waterless antiseptic agent (e.g., hand rub) if hands are not visibly soiled after contact with mucous membranes, respiratory secretions, or objects contaminated with respiratory secretions, whether or not gloves are worn.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing did not ensure to effectively manage the facility related to prevention of pressure ulcers and pressure injuries (PU/PI) for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed The administrator is responsible for planning and is accountable for all activities and departments of the center subject to rules and regulations promulgated by government agencies to ensure proper health care services to residents. The Administrator administers, directs and coordinates all activities of the center to assure that the highest degree of quality care is consistently provided to the resident of the facility. Review of job description for the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed The Director of Nursing is responsible for administration of nursing service in the nursing center. He/she directs plan and coordinates service activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when practicing enhanced barrier precautions during tracheostomy care and failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions as ordered by the physician. One of four resident records reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precaution revealed that Enhanced barrier precautions referred to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for resident known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO (Multidrug-resistant bacteria are bacteria that are resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobial drugs.)as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition. An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following 1. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices ( eg. Tracheostomy/ventilator tubes). Implementation of enhanced barrier precautions- a. Make gowns and gloves available immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that appropriate notices were provided related to transfer to the hospital/discharge for four of 40 records reviewed (Residents R52, R70, R71, R326). Findings include: Review of Resident R52's clinical record revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital on July 17, 2023, due to blockage of his suprapubic catheter (a tube surgically inserted through the skin over the pubic bone in order to drain urine from the bladder). Review of Resident R70's clinical record revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital on August 8, 2023, due to exacerbation of CHF (congestive heart failure, a condition in which the heart does not pump efficiently, which causes fluid to back up in the system, causing weight gain, edema and difficulty breathing). Review of Resident R71's clinical record revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital on August 27, 2023, due to elevated temperature and a swollen, discolored right hand. Review of Resident 32's clinical record revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$353,465 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $146,063 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
  • $60,372 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
  • $131,437 — penalty dated 2024-01-18
  • $7,796 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $7,797 — penalty dated 2023-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 2%Other / private 4%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,444per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next