No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Inglis House

2600 Belmont Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131 · Non profit - Corporation · 202 certified beds · (215) 581-0713 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 581-0713 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 20241 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,395 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,395 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2832 Belmont Ave · (215) 878-1212 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2101 Belmont Ave · (215) 879-2340 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4160 Monument Rd · (856) 471-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4001 Edgely Rd · (215) 685-0052 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.2%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.0%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.0%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.341.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.721.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.0–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge14.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.1–9.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 177.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.58 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, facility policies, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to adequately supervise one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure resulted in Resident R1 wandering in the hallways of the facility on an electric wheelchair, and accessing the fire stairway entrance door, falling down a flight of stairs while strapped to the wheelchair. Resident R1 was missing for a period of approximately four hours after the fall. Resident R1 required transfer to the hospital and diagnosed with rib fractures, a fracture of the right clavicle, a subdural hematoma and closed dislocation of left finger and five stiches to the right top of the head. This deficiency was identified as Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Elopement dated February 15, 2000, revealed the facility's protocol and guidelines to follow when a resident cannot be located. Continued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documentation, clinical records, hospital records, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate staff supervision for Resident R1. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who was found with a vertical laceration beginning at the midline of the forehead extending towards the scalp for one of 7 residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Safety revised on September 22, 2016, revealed nurse aides will make safety/hygiene rounds on all resident to ensure that the environment is safe and that resident hygiene needs are met. It is recommended that rounds be made every 2-3 hours. Continued review of policy revealed under bullet number 8 indicates Provide two or more person assist when necessary during transfer to ensure staff and resident safety. Further review of facility policy revealed under Care Plan Documentation section indicated, Assistive devices, safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, staff training records, information submitted by the facility, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards resulting in actual harm to Resident R127 who sustained a second degree burn on the left knee when an employee's personal hot beverage spilled on the resident for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R127). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy Hours of Work revised October 24, 2020, revealed employees are not permitted to leave the facility's campus during break periods. Breaks must be taken in the cafeteria; employees lounge, or in similarly designated non-work areas. No food or beverage is permitted in direct service delivery work areas. Review of Resident R127's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, observations, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely assistance with activities of daily living care for dependent residents for 3 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident R2, R9 and R6).Findings Include:Review of facility grievance records from January 2026 through June 2026 revealed ongoing concerns regarding staff responsiveness and timeliness of care. The monthly grievance logs documented repeated complaints involving delayed incontinence care, residents not awakened for care services, and delays in responding to resident requests.Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated March 22, 2026, revealed the resident is cognitively intact, able to communicate his/her needs and preferences, and has a suprapubic catheter (urinary drainage tube that is surgically inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the bladder to continuously drain urine).Further review of Resident R2's MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed, direct-care staff maintained current certification in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for one of four personnel files reviewed (Employee E15). Findings Include: Review of personnel file for Respiratory Therapist, Employee E15, revealed the employee had an expired CPR certification (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation -lifesaving procedure that maintains blood flow and oxygen to the brain and heart when the heart or breathing stops). Interview on [DATE], with Respiratory Therapist, Employee E15, confirmed CPR training was not renewed. Interview on [DATE], with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, and Director of Nursing, Employee E2, confirmed Respiratory Therapist, Employee E15, had an expired CPR certification. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident R4). Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled General Medication Procedures, revised September 3, 2025, revealed the purpose of the policy is to ensure residents receive medications in a timely manner, maintain continuity of prescribed therapeutic regimens, ensure prompt administration of initial medication doses, and provide medications in accordance with physician orders. The policy establishes that nursing staff are responsible for ensuring medications are available, accurately prepared, administered timely, and monitored to ensure residents receive prescribed medications without unnecessary delay or interruption. Observation on June 16, 2026, at 10:21a.m. revealed restorative aid, Employee E18, responded to Resident R4's activated call bell. When the call-bell was answered, Resident R4 reported he/she was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and modify interventions consistent with the resident's assessed needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings Include:Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], has a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 (indicating intact cognitive function), and requires set-up assistance for eating.Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident has diagnoses of thyroid disorders (condition in which the thyroid has not produced hormones at proper levels affecting metabolism energy overall body function), paraplegia (often caused by spinal cord injury or disease resulting in the loss of movement and sensation), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD- characterized by persistent patterns of inattention,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident call bells were within reach of them for 4 out of 5 residents observed (Resident R3, R4, R5, and R6). Findings include: During an observation on the 1 North nursing station, the following residents were observed in their rooms with call bells that were not within their reach. During an observation on May 14, 2026 at 3:17 p.m. Resident R3 was observed in the room lying in bed with the call bell hanging off the back of the bed where the resident could not reach the call bell. Licensed nurse (Employee E4) was present for this observation, picked the call bell up and placed it within the resident's reach. During an observation on May 14, 2026 at 3:20 p.m. Resident R4 was observed in their room lying in bed with the call bell on the floor, on the floor in the back of the bed. Licensed nurse (Employee E4) was present for this observation, picked the call bell up and placed it within the resident's reach. During an observation on May 14, 2026 at 3:25 p.m. Resident R5 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, review of clinical records, and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the May 2026 physician's orders included the following diagnosis: multiple sclerosis ( a neurological illness that can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms); cognitive communication deficit (occurs when a person struggles to communicate effectively due to underlying cognitive impairments such as attention, memory, executive function, or social cognition, rather than a primary language or speech disorder); intellectual disabilities (limitations in an individual's mental abilities that affect intelligence, learning and everyday life skills); muscle weakness; lack of coordination, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the resident's person-centered plan of care with a revision date of May 25, 2026, included a plan of care for bowel and urine incontinence, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the use of outside resources for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident R135).Findings Include: Review of Resident R135's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated January 29, 2026, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorder where the airway repeatedly becomes blocked during sleep, causing pauses in breathing and disrupted sleep). Review of Resident R135's comprehensive care plan dated July 25, 2024, revealed the resident had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of Resident R135's clinical record revealed an After Visit Summary dated October 9, 2026, that the resident was seen at the Sleep Disorder Center for sleep apnea. Discharge instructions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice, for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident R1).Findings include:A clinical record review revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include polyneuropathy ( condition damaged to multiple peripheral nerves leading to pain, weakness and sensory loss), trigeminal neuralgia (condition causes intense pain similar to an electric shock on the side of the face), paraplegia (form of paralysis affects the lower body) and chronic pain.Resident R1's care plan, initiated on May 24, 2024, identified a goal for the resident to verbalize pain adequate relief of pain or ability to cope with incompletely relieved pain. The care plan included an intervention to administer routine pain medication regime as order. A physician's order for Resident R1 to be administered Lyrica 75 mg give 1 capsule by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the physician of a new skin impairment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Notification of Change in Resident Status/Condition revised October 15, 2016, revealed the nurse will contact the physician to report nursing assessment/observations involving incidents, accidents, and significant changes in physical status. The nurse will obtain new orders as warranted from the physician, and these orders will be documented in the electronic medical record.Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 27, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body).Continued review of Resident R1's MDS revealed the resident was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries (localized damage to the skin and underlying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation related to a pressure ulcer for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include:Review of facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised August 19, 2025, revealed the facility will thoroughly investigate all reports of suspected or alleged abuse, and neglect; as well as all injuries of unknown origin to rule out potential abuse. Documentation pertinent to the investigation shall consist of written signed statements from the resident and witnesses. Interviews should be inclusive of employees (on all shifts) having contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident. Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 27, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment consistent with standards of professional practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings Include:Review of facility policy Skin Integrity: Wound Monitoring revised September 22, 2016, revealed when a new wound is identified the licensed nurse will measure the wound and document findings in the electronic medical record (EMR), and notify the Registered Nurse, and Physician. The physician's order for wound care treatments should include cleansing agent, frequency, and dressings as indicated. Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 27, 2025, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). Continued review of Resident R1's MDS revealed the resident was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of job's descriptions and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing did not effectively manage the facility to ensure that adequate supervision was provided to on one of one resident reviewed (Resident R1) at risk for elopement. This failure resulted in Resident R1 wandering in the hallways of the facility on an electric wheelchair, and accessing the fire stairway entrance door, falling down a flight of stairs while strapped to the wheelchair. Resident R1 required transfer to the hospital and diagnosed with rib fractures, a fracture of the right clavicle, a subdural hematoma and closed dislocation of left finger and five stiches to the right top of the head. This deficiency was identified as Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) job description revealed that the Administrator is responsible for directing the day-to-day operations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, faciltiy documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of nursing staff available to provide care for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Safety revised on September 22, 2016; revealed nurse aides will make safety/hygiene rounds on all resident to ensure that the environment is safe and that resident hygiene needs are met. It is recommended that rounds be made every 2-3 hours. Continued review of policy revealed under bullet number 8 indicates Provide two or more person assist when necessary during transfer to ensure staff and resident safety. Further review of facility policy revealed under Care Plan Documentation section indicated, Assistive devices, safety measures, amount of assistance required by the resident to be documented in the approach/interventions section of the plan of care. Review of Resident R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Solarium Dishwasher Usage, Revised March 19, 2025, revealed that, Chemical solutions shall be maintained at the correct concentration and Results of concentration checks shall be recorded. Further review revealed that for high temperature dishwashes, the was temperature should be 150-165 degrees Fahrenheit and The final rinse temperature shall be 180°F. Corrective actions shall be taken for final temperatures below the required final rinse temperatures. Review of facility policy titled, Food Preparation in Kitchen, dated March 12, 2018, revealed that all food products that are taken out of the original container or opened for food prep must be covered, labeled & dated. Initial tour of the Foodservice Department conducted on March 17, 2025, with the Foodservice Director (FSD), Employee E4, revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of facility garbage. Findings include: Initial tour of the Foodservice Department garbage area conducted on March 17, 2025, with the Foodservice Director (FSD), Employee E4, revealed the following: Observations of the trash area revealed debris and dirty plastics (gloves, cups, utensils) observed scattered on the ground around the dumpster. Further observations revealed severe urine like odor; opened gray trash bin filled with waste; and five large and opened cardboard boxes. Interview with Food Service, Employee E4 along duration of the tour confirmed observations of the dumpster area. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility protocol, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for resident's on enhanced barrier precautions during wound care and medication administration as ordered by the physician for four of 35 resident reviewed. (Resident R18, R78, R93, R112) Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precaution Review of physician orders for Resident R18 dated February 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was ordered for enhanced barrier precaution ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase, an enzyme produced by some bacteria that makes them resistant to certain antibiotics, including penicillin and cephalosporins) in the urine. Observation of the Resident R18's wound care on March 19. 2025, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that there was a sign placed outside the resident room to alert the staff and visitors of resident's enhanced barrier precaution status. The sign indicated to use gown, gloves for wound care along with other resident care activities with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide confidentiality of residents' personal health information during medication administration for one of two staff observed (Employee E6 and failed to ensure residents' privacy was maintained before entering rooms for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R9 and R62). Findings include: Observation of the first floor revealed on March 19, 2025, at 9:10 a.m. revealed that there was no nurse/staff at the medication cart. It was observed that there was numerous medication packet on top of the medication cart with resident's name, room number, name of medication and dosage of the medication printed on it. A medication administration observation was requested with Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse. Continued observation on March 19, 2025, at 9:20 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E6, was administering medication to the assigned residents. It was observed the medication packets were still on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure timely revision of the comprehensive care plan related to wounds for one of 35 records reviewed (Resident R93). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Weakness, Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region, and Open Wound of Lower Back and Pelvis. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed an order, revised March 18, 2025, for Santyl (an ointment used to treat wounds) to right ischium (area including the lower back and pelvis), every day shift for pressure wound. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that care plans had been developed for impaired skin integrity, specifying only left lower arm abrasion and scattered bruises and bruising of the left forearm and not the resident's current pressure wound to the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards related to medication administration for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R167). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings, and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. (b) The LPN administers medication and carries out the therapeutic treatment ordered for the patient in accordance with the following: (d) The Board recognizes codes of behavior as developed by appropriate practical nursing associations as the criteria for assuring safe and effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate tracheostomy care for one of two residents reviewed receiving respiratory services. (Resident R43) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Tracheostomy- Care of dated March 3, 2028, revealed that consistent and proper care will be applied to prevent obstruction, growth of bacteria, respiratory complications, or skin breakdown. A review of Resident R43's clinical records revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including, encounter for attention to tracheostomy. Further review of Resident R43's clinical records revealed a physician order dated, May 25, 2023, which indicated cuffed trach every shift, clean around tracheostomy and evaluate and document skin condition. Further review revealed an order dated May 25, 2025, for Trach:Blvona #6- Cuffless, indicating the tracheostomy tube size. Observations conducted on March 19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for four of four residents sampled for post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD) care. (Resident R158, R113, R102, and R130). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R158 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses to include traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, depression (a common mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and low energy levels that can significantly impact daily life and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)( a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, such as a natural disaster, war, violent crime, or personal loss) A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete performance reviews for five of five nurse aides' personnel files reviewed related to performance reviews as required (Employees E13, E14, E15, E16 and E17). Findings include: On March 19, 2025, annual performance reviews for Employees E13, E14, E15, E16 and E17 were requested from the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing. Facility did not provide annual performance reviews for Employees E13, E14, E15, E16 and E17 Interview on March 20, 2025, 1:16 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that the facility had not completed any performance reviews for any staff for the current year or the past year, including Employees E13, E14, E15, E16 and E17. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the record for reconciliation of controlled drugs was complete related to missing signatures on the Narcotic Count Sheet for one of five medication carts reviewed (3 North cart A). Findings include: Interview with licensed nurse, employee E7, on March 19, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that at each change of shift, the oncoming and outgoing nurses must verify that the recorded number of narcotics for each resident is consistent with the actual supply available, and it is the expectation that both nurses must sign the Narcotic Count Sheet after the reconciliation has been performed and verified. Review of the narcotic reconciliation documentation for the medication cart on the 3 North unit revealed that between the dates of March 12, 2025, and March 18, 2025, seven of 44 required nurse signatures were absent. Employee E7 confirmed that the signatures were absent. 28 Pa Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled properly related to labeling of open liquid medications, disposition of medication for discharge residents, and securing the cart lock when the nurse was not in sight for three of five medication carts reviewed (1 North cart A, 1 South cart B, and 3 North cart A). Findings include: Observation of first floor north cart one on March 19, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. with Employee E6, Licensed Practical Nurse, revealed that there was Insulin Degludec pen (treats diabetes by increasing your body's insulin levels to decrease your blood sugar. This medication is an injection) with no open date or expiration date. There was polyvinyl alcohol eye drop, and [NAME] tears eye drops both opened with no open date or expiration date/date to discard. Interview with Licesed staff, Employee E6, at the time of the observation confirmed that insulin pen should be discarded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of seven residents (Resident R2). Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), , polyneuropathy (condition of peripheral nerve are damaged), pressure ulcer of sacral, cramp and spasm. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated January 29, 2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident R2's physician orders dated January 11, 2025, indicated a wound treatment cleanse sacrum with soap and water, pat dry and apply foam dressing. Every evening shifts every other day for treatment. On February 25, 2025, at 10:22 a.m. an interview with the Resident R2 revealed that license nurse, Employee E8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's grievance was filed and investigated for or 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Grievances, with a revision date of November 2023 indicated that grievances can be submitted orally or in writing. The policy indicated that the employee receiving the grievance will immediately notify the Director or designee of the program to which the grievance is related. The policy also indicated that the Director or designee will contact the individual who filed the grievance within 24 hours after being informed of the grievance to review the issues/concerns with the individual. Continued review of the policy indicated that the Director or designee will initiate the grievance form by documenting the discussion with the individual, which will include, but not limited to, the date and time the complaint was received, the nature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered plan of care was developed for a resident with a diagnosis of heart failure for 1 out of 3 resident's reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility's Person Centered Care Plan Process, with a revision date of September 24, 2018, indicated that the care plan is developed through review of the resident's history, medical problems, assessment by each discipline, input from the resident and/or representative, and completion of the minimum data set assessment (MDS-a periodic assessment of a resident's needs). Continued review of the policy indicated that each resident's identified problem (s) are to be addressed on the plan of care and in the electronic medical record. The policy further explained that each problem will have a specific, realistic, measurable goal with a timeframe for completion. Review of Resident R1's October 2024 physician order included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that daily weights were obtained as ordered by the physician for a resident with a diagnosis of health failure, for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the resident's October 2024 physician order included the following diagnosis: obesity, paraplegia (the symptoms of paralysis that mostly affects the movement of the lower body); multiple sclerosis (an autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system which includes the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves; depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest); hypertension (high blood pressure), and heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscles can't pump blood as well as it should). Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was awake, alert, and oriented. Review of information submitted to the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician monitoring a resident with a diagnosis of heart failure for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Attending Physician Services, with a revision date of January 2019 indicated that the physician's oversight of services includes writing orders for care and treatment, conducting required visits, and reviewing residents' total program of care, including medications and treatments. The policy also indicated that the attending physician will evaluate residents based on medical necessity record progress notes, and that progress notes will be documented at each visit, and contain pertinent aspects of the resident's condition, current status and goals, and an evaluation of changes in the health status of the resident and the rationale for starting, continuing and discontinuing medications and other treatments. Continued review of the policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policies, review of facility investigation, review of facility policies and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R147). Findings include: Review of facility policy on abuse dated December 20, 2018, revealed that under section Purpose: To prohibit physical abuse, mental abuse, verbal abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, deprivation of goods and/or services by staff, exploitation, and misappropriation of property for all residents. Under Section Policy number two, physical abuse, mental abuse, verbal abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, deprivation of goods and or services by staff, exploitation and misappropriation of property will be prohibited. Residents will be free from physical abuse, mental abuse, verbal abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, corporal punishment and voluntary seclusions, deprivation of goods and or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from misappropriation of property for one of 35 records reviewed (Resident R128). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Reporting and Investigation, most recent revision date December 20, 2018, revealed that the purpose of the policy was to prohibit .misappropriation of property for all residents. Further review revealed that misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement .or wrongful (temporary or permanent) use of a resident's belongings .without the resident's consent. Review of facility document titled In-service: misappropriation of items and goods, undated, revealed that package handling procedures include all domestic boxes/packages should be delivered to the designated pick-up locations, and security does not sign or hold packages for staff or residents behind the work post.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, facility provided documentation and review of documentation from the Center of Disease and Control Prevention (CDC), it was determined that the facility did not ensure to develop and implement a care plan that includes measurable objectives, interventions and time frames for how staff will meet the residents' needs related to catheter care and enhanced barrier precautions for two of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R84 and R77) Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled 'Person-Centered Care Plan Process,' revised September 24, 2018, Identified problems are to be addressed on the care plan in the electronic medical record, per [NAME] policy and procedure guidelines. Observations on first floor unit, 1 North, on May 22, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. revealed a sign and supplies next to Resident R84's room and Resident R77's room for enhanced barrier precautions. In accordance with https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/workgroup/EnhancedBarrierPrecautions.html, Enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from an excessive dose of pain medication for one of 35 records reviewed (Resident R165). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis that affects all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), acquired deformity of chest and rib, other psychoactive (affecting the function of the brain) substance abuse in remission, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of nursing notes for Resident R165 revealed a note written by Licensed Nurse Practitioner Employee E6 on May 14, 2024, which stated, Fentanyl (a controlled narcotic pain medication which is applied via a patch placed on the skin for long acting delivery of the medication) 50 mcg [per hour patch] was unintentionally ordered and applied on 5/13/24, however patient made aware previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of dietary policies and procedures, interviews with residents and staff and observations of the food and nutrition services, it was determined that foods were not prepared and served by methods to conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. ( Residents R1, R2 and R3) Findings include: Review of the policy titled Food and Beverage Serving Temperature Requirements dated February 14, 2022, revealed that it was the responsibility of the food and nutrition services department to serve foods and beverages to the residents that were palatable, attractive and at safe and appetizing temperatures. The policy also indicated that serving temperatures for hot foods were 140 degrees Fahrenheit and cold foods 40 degrees Fahrenheit. This policy also indicated that the minimum holding temperatures for hot foods was 135 degrees Fahrenheit and the minimum holding temperature for cold foods was 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Interviews with Residents R1, R2 and R3 at 11:00 a.m., on April 10, 2024 revealed that hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that physician's orders were followed or clarified regarding the administration of two medications for one of eleven residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident R3 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to neuromuscular bladder dysfunction (also known as Neurogenic Bladder, is when a person lacks bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems) and insomnia (trouble falling and/or staying asleep). Further review of the clinical record for Resident R3 revealed an January 23, 2023, physician order for Lithostat Tablet 250 mg (Acetohydroxamic Acid), give 250 mg by mouth three times a day for Neurogenic bladder. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2024, for Resident R3 revealed that the Lithostat was administered three times a day March 1, 2024, through March 15, 2024, morning dose.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record, review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician's order were followed. For one of two residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Pain management. With the most recent revision date of July 28th, 2010, reveal that under section Purpose: To establish the measurement and interventions to be applied for pain management. Review of Section Policy: Pain Descriptors. Pain intensity maybe described using a number on a 10 point scale. Or by the terms mild, moderate, severe and excruciating. Mild pain will be defined as they score between 1 to 3 on a 10 point scale. Moderate pain will be defined as a score between 4 to 6 on a 10 point scale. Severe pain will be defined as a score between 7 to 10 on a 10 point scale. Excruciating pain. Worst pain imaginable will be defined as a score of 10 on a 10 point scale. Under section Pain Interventions: Pharmacological. The primary care provider or consultant will recommend an or prescribe any pharmacological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was distributed at appropriate temperatures and one of two dining rooms observed. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Food and Beverage Serving Temperatures Requirements with the most recent revision date of August 6, 2020, revealed that under section Purpose: To ensure that food safety practices and general requirements for keeping food at specified temperatures for service to residents are maintained. Section Policy revealed that food that is prepared and cooked in the [NAME] kitchen is transported to service areas in an enclosed cart to the dining rooms/solariums. Food temperatures are taken before the food is transported from the kitchen to the dining room and recorded. Once the food arrives in the dining rooms/solariums, it will be placed in the steam table wells to maintain temperature. Temperatures will be taken during the serving process to make sure that time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's policies, review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violations involving resident neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of grievance dated September 25, 2023, by Resident R1 revealed that the resident reported, he did not receive incontinence care in a timely manner during the 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. shift. He also reported that he did not receive wound care during the shift. Review of a statement by Resident R1 obtained by the social worker dated September 18, 2023, alleged that the resident did not receive incontinence care for approximately 5 hours from the 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. nursing aide assigned to the resident. Resident stated he had to wait for approximately 5 hours because the nurse aide stated she had to help someone else. Resident also stated he rang the call bell. Interview with Resident R1 dated December 20, 2023, at 11:30 a.m. stated few weeks ago he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that feeding formulas were labelled according to professional standards for five of five residents with tube feeding observed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy on Enteral feeding with effective date of December 1, 2006, and a review date of September 22, 2022, revealed that under section Policy: #3. The licensed nurse is responsible to assure patency of the feeding tube, administration of nutritional products and medications, physician's orders, assessment of the tube and skin site and documentation of the enteral feeding process. #5 Documentation of the enteral feeding orders, volume, amounts, and care will be completed on the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). Under section Procedure #1 Assembly and initiation feeding #d. Set ups will be changed every 48 hours or when a new bottle is put up. #e. Tube feeding will be labelled with resident's name, room number, rate, date,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with staff and residents, and the review of the clinical record and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1 out of 3 residents reviewed were properly assessed to self-administer a supplement and medications (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Self-Administration-Medication and Treatment, with a revision date of June 8, 2020, indicated that residents will be assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine that the resident has or can achieve the skills needed to safety administer their own medications and/or treatments. The policy also indicated that registered nurse would complete the initial Self Administration of Medication Evaluation in the electronic medical record, and that if the resident is deemed appropriate to self-administer medications and/or treatments, the license nurse will obtain an order from the Primary Care Provider for the resident to self-administer. Continued review of the policy indicated that any significant changes to the resident's condition that may impact their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of resident clinical records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to uphold the privacy and dignity of two of 4 residents utilizing catheter care (Residents R107, R113). Findings include: The facility Urinary Catheter -Insertion policy last reviewed 11/22/17, indicated the purpose of the urinary catheter is To ensure appropriate usage of indwelling catheters. It further revealed under Procedures, Equipment that dignity bag is part of the procedure. During an observation on July 24, 2023, at 1:51 p.m. Resident R113 was observed in the room utilizing a suprapubic catheter which was facing the door without a privacy cover on the urine collection bag. During an observation on July 25, 2023, at 9:28 a.m. Resident R107 was observed in the room utilizing a suprapubic catheter which was facing the door without a privacy cover on the urine collection bag. During an interview on July 25, 2023, at 9:59 a.m. observation were made with Director of Nursing who confirmed that the facility failed to uphold the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans for diabetic management care needs and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for two of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R24 and R16). Findings include: The facility's policy titled Person-Centered Care Plan Process last revised on January 22, 2012, indicated that the facility Each resident will have an individualized, comprehensive care plan established at the time of admission and updated accordingly. The plan of care is used as a working tool to assist the resident to attain or maintain his/her highest level of functioning. The plan of care is developed through review of the resident's history, medical problems, assessment by each discipline, input from the resident and/or resident representative when available, and completion of the minimum data set. During an interview with Resident R24 on July 24, 2023, at 12:55 p.m. it was revealed that resident had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received at least twelve hours of continuing education per year as required for one of six nurse aides reviewed (Employee E10). Findings include: Review of Employee E10 submitted employee documentation revealed the nurse aide had a hire date of January 3, 2022. Review of documentation provided by the facility revealed Employees E10 did not complete 12 hours of annual trainings as required and the annual trainings received did not include abuse or dementia training. Interview on July 27, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. with the Director of Nursing, Employee E2, confirmed the facility did not have documented evidence that Employee E10 completed 12 hours of annual training as required. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a) Staff Development 28 Pa. Code 201.20(d) Staff Development

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,395 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,395 — penalty dated 2025-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
INGLIS FOUNDATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/11/2007
ROTH, DYANNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/21/2017
BATHE, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
GREEN, LORYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/17/2023

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$36.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.9M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 3%Other / private 4%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$737per resident / day
operating cost
$22,413per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$560per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395134. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next