Monumentalpostacutecare At Woodside Park
4001 Ford Road, Philadelphia, PA 19131 · For profit - Partnership · 180 certified beds · (215) 877-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0603) — most recent Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $30,752 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.8% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.2% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.26 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.9%CMS range 31.7–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.4–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.1–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hot water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks and shower rooms were maintained at a safe temperature. This failure placed residents on three of three nursing units at risk of serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (First floor East, Second floor East and West) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Physical Environment Common A, dated January 2, 2025, revealed the facility will be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to protect the health and safety of residents, personnel and the public. The facility will meet the applicable provisions of the 1985 edition of the life safety code of the National Fire Protection Association. Hot water outlets accessible to residents shall be controlled so that the water temperature at the outlets does not exceed 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policies and facility documentation, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was free of neglect which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who was transferred from chair to bed without the use of a mechanical lift and sustained a left humeral fracture for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, revealed It is the policy of the facility to protect its residents from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, and that all reports of abuse will be reported to the appropriate agencies and thoroughly investigated. The policy further defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm. Review of the clinical record for Resident R1 revealed the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review facility policies and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment in resident care areas for two of three nursing units observed (1st floor East and 2nd floor [NAME] Nursing units). Findings Include:Review of facility policy Physical Environment: Common Areas dated January 2025, revealed, the facility will be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to protect the health and safety of residents, personnel and the public. On December 8, 2025, at 1:25 p.m. unit manager, Employee E8 confirmed that room [ROOM NUMBER]B had no grid on the heating unit and the cover of the heating unit was coming off. On December 9, 2025, at 12:45 p.m. the Maintenance Director, Employee E6, confirmed that room [ROOM NUMBER]B bedside dresser was broken on the sides of the dresser, there was a large amount of woodchip inside of the first drawer. room [ROOM NUMBER]B dresser had 3 broken shelves as the railing were dispatched and were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to safeguard medications tor one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R7). Findings Include: Review of Resident R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 30, 2025, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe). Continued review of Resident R7's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident R7's comprehensive care plan revised February 15, 2025, revealed the resident had the potential for inadequate respiratory function. Intervention dated July 26, 2022, indicated to provide medication as ordered. Review of Resident R7's physician order summary revealed an order dated January 5, 2025, to administer Breztri Aerosphere Inhalation Aerosol (prescription inhaler), two times per day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of the medications for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R10).Findings Include:Review of FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a federal agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, protects public health through the regulation of foods, drugs, cosmetics, and medical devices) guidance for Haldol revealed that, HALDOL (haloperidol) is indicated for use in the treatment of schizophrenia. Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death.Review of Resident R10's October 2025 through December 2025 physician orders revealed multiple PRN orders for Haldol injection (a prescription first-generation antipsychotic medication used to treat conditions such as schizophrenia) 5 mg/ml,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility discharge which occurred Against Medical Advise (AMA), attempts to provide discharge instruction, assess resident's capacity to make decision, attempts to contact the resident's representative, and notify the physician, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents R166).Findings include:Review of facility policy Admission, Transfer and Discharge,' undated policy, indicated Transfer and discharge include movement of resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. Transfer and discharge dos does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same certified facility.On December 11, 2025, at 10:12 a.m., the Social Services Director, Employee E9, confirmed that Resident R166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on September 27,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was updated and revised to address a resident's diagnosis of legal blindness and required assistance with eating for one of 29 residents reviewed. (Resident R143) Findings include:Review of the Resident R 143's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool for all residents), dated November 25, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including legal blindness and cerebrovascular accident (CVA)with left hemiplegia(a stroke that caused one sided paralysis to the left side of his body). The MDS assessment indicated the resident was dependent for most functional abilities. The resident was assessed as requiring total assistance with eating, which was defined as the helper performing all of the effort with the resident performing none of the effort, or requiring the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician orders related to high blood sugars for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident R7).Findings include: Review of facility policy Diabetic Management revised August 2013 revealed hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) is defined as a blood glucose level greater than 300. Per the facility policy, the glucose parameter levels indicate if a blood sugar is greater than 300 than the physician should be notified. Documentation of the event, along with the outcome, should be included in the nurse's progress note. Review of Resident R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 30, 2025, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Continued review of Resident R7's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident R7's physician order summary revealed an order dated February 3, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that tracheostomy equipment was properly maintained for one of one resident receiving tracheostomy care. (Resident R127)Findings include:Findings Include:Observation of Resident R127 on December 9, 2025, at 10:01 a.m. revealed that the resident was on a tracheostomy. It was revealed that the tracheostomy tube was not dated to indicate the date it was last changed. Further observation revealed that the oxygen tubing was not dated. It was also revealed that the tracheostomy tube was placed in a container, and the container was dirty. Continued observation revealed that the trach collar and the dressing around the stoma were not dated to indicate the date of the dressing change. Observation of the tracheostomy equipment and the humidifier revealed that the last inspection date for the humidifier was February 14, 2020, and the next inspection due date was February 14, 2021. Continued observation revealed that the suction machine was inspected on July 29, 2025, and the inspection due date was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain effective communication with a dialysis provider for one of two residents reviewed receiving hemodialysis. (Residents R82).Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Hemodialysis, undated, states, Dialysis pre and post treatment summaries will be communicated to facility. A review of Resident R82's record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease. On December 9, 2025, at 2:37 p.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing, Employee E2, confirmed that dialysis communication for Resident R82 was requested by the facility. A binder containing communication sheets with residents' information and documentation of communication between the facility and the dialysis team was provided. Further review of the dialysis communication binder revealed that on several days the communication sheets were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to timely implement behavioral health interventions for one of five residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional health (Resident R4).Findings:Review of Resident R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 30, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), depression (mood disorder characterized by low mood, a feeling of sadness, and a general loss of interest in thing), and bipolar disease (extreme swings in mood and thought). Review of Resident R4's clinical record revealed a psychiatry note dated November 4, 2025, by Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, Employee E14, that revealed the resident was being seen for evaluation and management of bipolar disease and dementia. Per the psychiatry note, Resident R4 reported mood is all right, no sadness, and no anxiety. Resident R4 was noted to be getting out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage and handling of personal food products brought in from outside sources for 1 of 29 residents. (R45).Findings Include:Review of Facility Policy: Resident Representative/Family Provided Food undated, states Food items provided and considered perishable are to be brought into the dietary department and food will be stored in the designated area which shall be temperature controlled. 3. No food will be held for more than 2 days from the provided date. 4. Food provided will be dated and labeled including use by date not to exceed 2 days. On December 8, 2025, at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R45, who had a small refrigerator next to his bed. Resident R45 was observed not to have a refrigerator thermometer inside the refrigerator or a thermometer log to monitor the refrigerator temperature. The resident also had two personal food containers inside the refrigerator that were not labeled, one food container on top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to ensuring that hot water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks and shower rooms were maintained at a safe temperature. This failure placed residents on three of three nursing units at risk of serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (First floor East, Second floor East and West) Findings include: Review of the Nursing Home Administers (NHA) job description revealed that the NHA is responsible for the overall management and operation of the facility, ensuring that high-quality healthcare services are delivered in a safe, compliant, and resident-centered environment. The Administrator enforces all regulations related to the level of healthcare provided, resident safety, and the protection of residents' personal property and individual rights.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices by not wearing a gown during tracheostomy care and incontinence care for one of 29 residents reviewed for tracheostomy care and incontinence care (Resident R127).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with an MDRO, as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). High-contact resident care activities include:DressingBathing/showeringTransferringProviding hygieneChanging linensChanging briefs or assisting with toiletingDevice care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency and conduct an investigation related to an allegation of neglect for one of 9 residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include:A review of the Incident and Accidents Documentation policy, which was undated, revealed The facility will document unusual occurrences and events. Guidelines q. The following occurrences warrant an incident report a. Actual, alleged, or suspected abuse, including verbal abuse, oral, written or gestured, sexual abuse, harassment, coercion, assault, physical abuse, hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, pushing, pulling, rough hanging, etc.On September 4, 2025, at 2:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator, Employee E1, who reported that the facility was not aware of any incontinence neglect, with respect to Resident R2. Employee E1 further reported that the Human Resources Director, Employee E11, was out sick, and the facility was unable to provide the nurse aide personnel file for Employee E14, who had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall and to ensure that an air mattress was properly fastened to the bed for two out of nine residents reviewed. (Residents R1 and R8).Findings include:A review of the undated facility policy title Incident and Accidents Documentation revealed The facility will document unusual occurrences and events. Guidelines q. The following occurrences warrant an incident report a. Actual, alleged, or suspected abuse, including verbal abuse, oral, written or gestured, sexual abuse, harassment, coercion, assault, physical abuse, hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, pushing, pulling, rough hanging, etc.Clinical record review revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, falls, pain, acute kidney failure, encephalopathy (disease of the brain), muscle weakness, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete documentation of resident's clinical records for one of 9 resident records reviewed (Resident R9).Findings include:A review of the Incident and Accidents Documentation policy, which was undated, revealed The facility will document unusual occurrences and events. Guidelines q. The following occurrences warrant an incident report a. Actual, alleged, or suspected abuse, including verbal abuse, oral, written or gestured, sexual abuse, harassment, coercion, assault, physical abuse, hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, pushing, pulling, rough hanging, etc.On September 4, 2025, at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator, Employee E1, and the weekend supervisor, Employee E13. They reported that on August 24, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., an incident occurred in the front lobby involving Resident R9 during a visit with the resident's family. Employee E13, who responded to the situation, confirmed that there was no documentation in Resident R9's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, review of facility policy, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to maintain an environment free of potential hazards for one resident with elopement risk (Resident R14). One of four residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of undated facility policy Resident Elopement Follow-Up Procedure, revealed that Guidelines: After an elopement,. The following actions will be initiated: 1) A photograph will be taken and placed at the reception desk identifying the resident as an elopement risk. 2) The receptionist will be familiarized with the resident. 3) Elopement Risk will be added to resident's Care Plan. 4) An elopement assessment will be conducted for residents on incident and at least quarterly thereafter. 5) If a president is no longer an elopement risk, he/she will be reassessed and care [plan will be updated as appropriate. The facility strives to prevent resident/patient elopement. The facility also recognizes mobility as a strength to be supported and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility failed to ensure that resident were assisted out of bed as per resident's preference for nine of 69 residents observed (Resident R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Quality of Care: Activities of Daily Living - Prevent Deterioration,' indicates that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that diminution was unavoidable. Interview with licensed nurse, employee E4, on April 9, 2025 at 10:50 am, revealed that residents are to be assisted out of bed by 11:00 am. Interview with Resident R11, on April 9, 2025, at 11:15 am, revealed that he is paralyzed on right side of body and requires assistance with transfer from bed to chair. Interview with Resident R11 revealed that the resident prefers to be placed in wheelchair during day shift (7-3 shift). Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview with residents, it was determined that facility did not provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for four of 20 rooms observed (common shower room, Resident R8's room, room#225-B, room [ROOM NUMBER]-A) Findings include: Review of facility policy related to 'Physical environment: common areas,' states that the facility will be maintained to protect the health and safety of residents, personnel and the public. Observations of common shower room on unit 2-West, on April 9, 2025, at 10:30 am, revealed used towels on floor and used paper towels on floor in toilet stall. Further observations revealed shower gel/shampoo bottles on floor in shower stall. Further observations revealed used hygiene products on shower bed; shower bed appeared unclean. Findings confirmed with facility's director of nursing. Observations in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed stained ceiling tile near bed B; upon interview with resident R7 it was revealed that during rainy weather water leaks through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Storage of Refrigerated Foods Policy, revised March 9, 2024, indicated that staff must label and note pull date on all food items when removing from freezer. Further review revealed that refrigerated food held for more than 24 hours will be marked to indicate the date the food will be consumed or discarded. A follow-up tour of the main kitchen was conducted on Thursday, January 9, 2025, at 10:45 p.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E13. Observations at 10:46 a.m. revealed a bucket with soapy water and rag was standing on the preparation table in the cooking area meanwhile the cook was assembling sandwiches. Observations of the main refrigerator at 10:50 p.m. revealed three rolls of 10-pound ground beef, a bag of raw mixed chicken, and a bag of raw chicken thighs were unlabeled and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on Tuesday, January 7, 2025, at 9:57 a.m. with Employee E16, Cook, which revealed that the blue dumpster was fully open and overflowing with cardboard boxes. Additional piles of cardboard and boxes was observed on the ground on all four sides of the dumpster. Follow up observation with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E13, conducted on Thursday, January 9, 2025, at 10:32 a.m. revealed that the blue dumpster remained fully open and overflowing with cardboard and carboard boxes. Additional piles of cardboard and boxes was observed on the ground on all four sides of the dumpster. Interview with the FSD at 10:32 a.m. on Thursday, January 9, 2025, confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer, for one of four residents reviewed. (Residents R136) Findings Include: Review of nursing notes for Resident R136 dated April 21, 2024, at 11:37 p.m. revealed that the resident had a seizure and was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation at approximately 11:25 a.m. Further review revealed a note, dated July 24, 2024, at 6:27 a.m., which indicated that Resident R136 was admitted to the local hospital for altered mental status on July 23, 2024. Further record reviews for Residents R136 revealed that no documentation was available for review at the time of the survey to indicate that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the facility-initiated emergency transfers and discharges. Review of documentation provided by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed provide appropriate bed hold notice to a resident's representative of a facility-initiated transfer to the hospital for one of four residents reviewed related to transfers (Resident R136). Findings include: Review of Resident R136's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated February 26, 2024, revealed that the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of nursing notes for Resident R136 revealed a note, dated April 21, 2024, at 11:37 p.m. which indicated that the resident had a seizure and was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation at approximately 11:25 a.m. Further review revealed a note, dated July 24, 2024, at 6:27 a.m., which indicated that Resident R136 was admitted to the local hospital for altered mental status on July 23, 2024. Review of Resident R136's clinical record revealed that there was no bed hold notice available for review in the resident's record. Interview with the Social Services Director, Employee E9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected resident status related to restraints for two of 34 records reviewed (Residents R9, R38). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R9 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of schizophrenia (a chronic mental illness characterized by a disconnect from reality, disorganized thinking and speech, and changes in behavior), anxiety, and dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain) Review of the most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic assessment of resident care needs) completed on September 22, 2024, revealed that in section P- Restraints and Alarms, it was documented that the resident's chair prevents rising and that this restraint was used less than daily. Observations conducted on January 8, 2025, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that Resident R9 was ambulating at will through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update Pennsylvania Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) of one resident with a new diagnosis of a serious mental disorder, out of 34 sampled residents reviewed (Residents R 103). Findings include: Review of Resident R103's clinical record revealed; the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure (Acute kidney injury happens when the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste products from the blood; when the kidneys can't filter wastes, harmful levels of wastes may build up), Injury of Unspecified Body Region, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels). Review of Pennsylvania Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR- an in-depth mental health assessment to determine appropriate services and placement) Level I Form of R 103 indicated that it was completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan related to dementia, smoking, and pain management for 3 of 34 records reviewed (Residents R7, R28, R155). Findings include: Review of clinical records revealed that Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels), and Dementia (a general term for a group of brain conditions that cause a decline in mental abilities). Review of Resident R7's current care plan revealed that there was no care plan was developed for the dementia care. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, and the Director of Nursing, on January 13, 2025, at 12:20 p.m., it was confirmed that no care plan was developed for the Dementia care needs of Resident R7. Observations conducted on January 10, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were updated in a timely manner for one of 34 records reviewed related to hospice (Resident R31). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including, congestive heart failure (an accumulation of fluid around the heart which makes it more difficult for the heart to beat effectively), ventricular tachycardia (a heart rhythm where the ventricles constrict abnormally fast, putting the resident at risk of cardiac arrest), and presence of pacemaker (a device implanted into the chest to regulate heart rhythm). Further review revealed a physician order dated October 10, 2023, which read Pacemaker .to be turned off due to hospice status. Review of the care plan revealed that it had been updated that same day to read the same. A physician order was found to discontinue hospice care dated December 2, 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not provide requested evidence of competency trainings for licensed nursing staff. Findings include: On January 10, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. the surveyor requested skills competency evaluations for Licensed Nurses. The requested skills were to be related to medication administration, dementia and behavioral, catheter, tracheostomy care, wound care, and abuse prevention and reporting. In an interview on January 10, 2024, at 1:54 p.m. with Educator, Employee E12, stated that the facility was unable to supply the surveyor with all the requested skills competencies for the nurses, stating that they didn't have them. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were disposed in a timely manner for one of 3 closed records reviewed (Resident R162). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation for Resident R162 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility against medical advice on October 24, 2024. While a resident, she had an order for Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML Give 0.25 milliliter by mouth every three hours as needed for Pain/SOB hospice, and Lorazepam Concentrate 2 MG/ML Give 0.25 milliliter by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety/agitation. Morphine is a Schedule 2 controlled medication, which are classified as high potential for misuse, dependence, and addiction. Lorazepam is a schedule 4 controlled substance which has a lower potential for abuse than schedule 2 substances, however, the abuse of a schedule 4 medication may lead to physical or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related with Transmission Based Precautions for one of 34 residents reviewed ((Resident R113). Findings include: Review of literature review revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions are infection control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of novel or Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms. Enhanced Barrier Precautions require to employ the use of targeted personal protective equipment (PPE) during high contact patient/resident activities. On January 10, 2025, at 2:39 p.m., review of the door of the room of Resident R113 revealed a guiding description pasted on it, indicating that Resident R113 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Review of the physician order for Resident R113 revealed that Resident R113 had an order dated July 11, 2024, to Cleanse G-tube site daily with soap and water, every day-shift. Observation on January 10, 2025, at 2:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plans regarding preventing a reinfestation of lice for one of ten residents reviewed. (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of clinical records revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Further review of Resident R2's clinical record indicated that on May 31, 2024, he returned to the facility after a visit with his sister, and the next day was observed to have lice in his scalp and received treatment to himself, his roommate and there room and clothing. Further review revealed a similar incident that happened on April 16, 2024, when his sister brought in clothing for him which were infested with lice and resulted with the same treatments.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the physical environment, reviews of the pest control operators' service, reports and contract and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: A review of the pest control operator's contracted service agreement revealed that it was the responsibility of the maintenance department staff to repair structural concerns (gaps under doors, holes in walls, screens, around pipes, crevices around windows or doorways, faulty downspouts). The service agreement indicated that the repairs to the physical environment were essential to eradicate pest and rodent problems. Observations of the physical enviornment of the facility revealed that the main kitchen, main dinning room, lobby, entrance to the facility, administrator's office, first floor nursing unit were located on the ground level of the building. Observations of the food and nutrition services department on April 2, 2024 revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared appropriately for nine of nine residents on a pureed diet (Residents R52, R125, R4, R113, R445, R34, R55, R66, and R87). Findings Include: Review of undated facility documentation Dysphagia Level 1/Pureed Diet revealed the consistency of pureed foods should be smooth and thick enough to mound on the plate, and similar in consistency to that of pudding. Review of facility documentation dated April 5, 2024, revealed the following nine residents were ordered a pureed diet: Residents R52, R125, R4, R113, R445, R34, R55, R66, and R87. Observations on April 2, 2024, at 12:08 p.m. revealed Resident R52 was having lunch in the dining room. Observations of Resident R52's lunch revealed the pureed chicken and green, pureed vegetable had a watery appearance and was runny on the plate. Observations on April 2, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. of the tray line steam table in the main kitchen with the Food Service Director, Employee E16, revealed when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program related to infection surveillance, antibiotic usage and isolation precautions for four of four residents reviewed for antibiotics (Residents R45, R33, R124 and R15). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection Control undated, revealed, Surveillance data shall be routinely reviewed, and recommendations made for the prevention and control of additional cases. Continued review revealed, Investigates, controls and prevents infections in the facility; Decides what procedures, such as isolation, shall be applied to an individual resident; Maintains a record of incidents and corrective actions related to infections; Maintains a log of infections, of urinary catheters, residents with DRO [drug resistant organisms] and their room numbers and a log of residents on antibiotics. Further review revealed, When the Infection Control Program determines that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and systems for monitoring antibiotic use, for four of four residents reviewed for antibiotics (Residents R45, R33, R124 and R15). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection Control undated, revealed, The facility will maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. During Entrance Conference on April 2, 2024, at 10:51 a.m. information pertaining to the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship program was requested. Review of progress notes for Resident R45 revealed a nurses note, dated March 27, 2024, at 10:41 p.m. which stated that the resident was readmitted to the facility after being hospitalized for a right foot infection. The note indicated that the resident was positive for MRSA (Methicillin-resistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, observations, and record reviewed, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper accommodation of needs for one of seven residents reviewed regarding appropriate wheelchair size. (Resident R47) Finding include: Review or Resident 47's clinical record revealed that this resident was admitted into the facility on December 4, 2023, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, unspecified dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain), type 2 diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin), pain in unspecified joints and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R47' s current care plan revealed that Resident R47 was at risks for falls related to ambulatory disfunction, decrease cognition, decreased mobility, and unsteady gait. Resident R47 was assessed by physical therapy on December 5, 2023, then provide a wheelchair. Review of physical therapy notes revealed that Resident R 47 was re-assessed on February 20, 2024, and it was determined that the resident's wheelchair was too small and required a larger wheelchair. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advanced directives were accurately reflected in residents' records for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R45). Findings include: Review of Resident R45's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated February 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), seizure disorder (abnormal electrical activity in the brain) and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage). Continued review revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment on one of three nursing units reviewed (Two [NAME] unit). Findings include: Observation, on April 2, 2024, at 11:39 a.m. revealed that the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was open and that there was no screen in the window. Observation, on April 2, 2024, at 11:57 a.m. revealed the front panel of the heating/air conditioning system in room [ROOM NUMBER] was falling off. Continued observation, on April 2, 2024, at 12:05 p.m. revealed a large hole in the wall above the baseboard by the bathroom. Interview, at the time of the observation, Resident R19 stated that the hole bothered her and wished that it could be repaired. Continued observation, on April 3, 2024, at 11:01 a.m. of the Two [NAME] unit revealed that following: room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a hole in the wall along the baseboard behind the A bed; room [ROOM NUMBER] the dresser by the B bed had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of one incident during a resident incontinence care for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R 442). Findings include: Review of Resident R442's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], resident's cognition is intact. Resident R442 was transferred to facility for continued medical management and physical therapy/ occupational therapy services. Resident was transferred from the hospital after repeated falls, no head trauma and bilateral leg weakness and feeling anxious about ambulating. On April 2, 2024, at 1:05 p.m. a family interview was held with the Resident R442, resident's husband, and son. It was reported that on March 23 to 24, 2024 Resident R442 waiting a long time to receive incontinence care. Resident R442 reported that she was wet and soil for hours from Saturday, March 23 to Sunday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care for two of eight residents reviewed related to activities of daily living (Residents R45 and R70). Findings include: Review of facility policy Grooming - Hair and Nails revised January 31, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide grooming services that promote an appropriately attractive appearance, improve morale, and prevent infections. Staff should provide fingernail care by cleaning fingernail beds and keeping fingernails trimmed and smooth Observation, on April 2, 2024, at 12:24 p.m. revealed that Resident R45's fingernails were long, overgrown, and had dirt underneath them. Interview, at the time of the observation, Resident R45 stated that he does not like long nails, that he needed his fingernails trimmed and cleaned, and that he was unable to do it himself due to his right-sided hand and arm weakness. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete performance reviews for two of two nurse aides reviewed as required (Employees E28 and E29). Findings Include: Review of undated facility documentation, Active Employees Over 1 Year, revealed that Employee E28 was hired by the facility as a nurse aide on July 12, 2022. Continued review revealed that Employee E29 was hired by the facility as a nurse aide on August 3, 2009. Annual performance reviews were requested for Employees E28 and E29. Interview on April 4, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, revealed annual performance reviews were not completed for Nurse Aides, Employee E28 and E29. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(2) Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of two medication carts observed remained locked on a secured nursing unit. (Second floor0. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Grand Rx policy and Procedure Manual last revised June 1, 2020 revealed that to properly maintain security of all medications, employee are to keep medication carts always locked, unless in immediate attendance and not let medication cart sit in nursing station, hall, or lounge unlocked. Observation on second floor secured nursing unit on April 2,2024 at 11:00 a.m. revealed an unlocked medication cart in the hall with no employee in sight. Observed was a resident sitting in a wheelchair next to the open cart. Interview with Licensed nurse, Employee E24 at time of observation confirmed that the medication cart was unlocked, and that this employee was assigned to the medication cart and stepped away to assists to a resident in another room. 28 Pa.Code 211.9 (a)(1) Pharmacy Services 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1) Nursing Services
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Facility's Assessment included a risk assessment for each resident environment to remain free of accident hazards for one of one nursing units observed (Second Floor Behavioral Health Nursing Unit) and one of one resident's reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the Facility's Facility Assessment Tool no date, revealed: Purpose The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Use this assessment to make decisions about your direct care staff needs, as well as your capabilities to provide services to the residents in your facility. Using a competency-based approach focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The intent of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent involuntary seclusion for four of four residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Observation tour of the second floor locked behavioral health unit on December 11, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. revealed upon entrance to the unit there are a set of two locked doors that prevent residents from entering or exiting the nursing unit without a staff swipe card which restricts the residents' movements to the unit. Upon entering the locked unit, it was observed that R1, R2, R3, and R4, were restricted to a side hallway of the T shaped locked behavioral health unit which further restricted the residents from the dining room and the shower room related to the behavioral health unit still being under renovations. An interview with the Administrator on December 11, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. where the Administrator was asked for evidence that the Resident / Representative received notification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included non-pharmacological interventions for a resident receiving PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the second floor locked behavioral health unit on November 15, 2023, with a diagnosis to include Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of Resident R1's Care Plan initiated on November 16, 2023, revealed a focus area of Resident receives Psychotropic medication with interventions to include non-medication inventions prior to medicating resident. Further review of the care plan revealed no non-pharmacological interventions mentioned that were to be attempted prior to administering PRN psychotropic medications. Review of a Nurse Progress note dated December 3, 2023, at 6:07 a.m. revealed: Received resident in bed sleeping. Around 3am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the second floor locked behavioral health unit on November 15, 2023, with a diagnosis to include Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Review of a Nurse Progress note dated December 3, 2023, at 6:07 a.m. revealed: Received resident in bed sleeping. Around 3am resident was yelling and talking to self. PRN Chlorpromazine (Thorazine - antipsychotic medication) 50mg given. Around 5am resident fell asleep in her wheelchair in room. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that non-pharmacological behavioral approaches were attempted prior to administering the Chlorpromazine. Review of a Psychiatry Note dated December 3, 2023, at 9:38 a.m. revealed: Nursing staff called earlier around 0715 as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understood after a selected resident was transferred to the hospital for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set-Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R1 dated September 8, 2023, revealed that the resident had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated that the cognitive status was moderately impaired. Review of nursing note for Resident R1 dated October 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was transported out to the hospital related to an unwitnessed fall. Review of clinical record revealed no evidence that Resident R31's representative was notified of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in writing, and in a language and manner they understood. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set-Assessment of resident care needs) for Resident R1 dated September 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a BIMS score of 10 which indicated that the cognitive status was moderately impaired. Review of Nursing note for resident R1 dated October 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was transported out to the hospital related to an unwitnessed fall. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that there was no documented evidence that Resident R1's representative was provided with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of Resident R1's facility-initiated transfer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a resident's care plan after multiple falls one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility undated policy, titled, Fall Prevention Policy, indicated that the care plan will be reviewed and revised to reflect immediate interventions and ongoing interventions to prevent further falls. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a nursing note dated, September 12, 2023, Resident R1 had a fall and hit the back of his head and was discharged to the hospital. Further review revealed a nursing note dated, October 12, 2023, at 5:04 p.m. which stated, resident was found on the floor in his room next to bed and was complaining of pain. Another nursing note dated, October 12, 2023, at 12:41 a.m. noted another fall, within 24 hours, resident was on floor beside bed. Resident R1 was discharged to the hospital. Review of Resident R1's care plan, dated revised May 31, 2023, revealed that Resident R1 was at risk for falls. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$30,752 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $22,350 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
- $8,402 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/30/1989 |
| MILLER, MICHAEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/30/1989 |
| MILLER, PHILIP | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/30/1989 |
| MILLER, ROBERT | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/30/1989 |
| MILLER-GREENBURG, STEPHANIE | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/30/1989 |
| WELLS, ANGELA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/30/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $759K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396076. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.