Paul's Run

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 420 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 220 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 113.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to report a resident's fall incident and bruise to the local State agency as required for one of four residents reviewed for falls (Resident R14).Findings include:Review of facility policy Investigating Incident Reports and Adverse Events, not dated, revealed all adverse events occurring to residents will be investigated for root cause and to rule out abuse and neglect. An adverse event includes falls, both witnessed and unwitnessed.Clinical record review revealed Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Cerebrovascular Accident (known as stroke, disruption of blood flow to brain, which can lead to brain damage), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side (affect movement/sensation on one side of body). Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance was provided during transfer for one resident which resulted in a fall incident for one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident R14).Findings include:Review of facility policy Fall Prevention Protocol, not dated, revealed each resident residing at this facility will be provided services and care that ensures that the resident's environment remains as free from accident hazards as possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Clinical record review revealed Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Cerebrovascular Accident (known as stroke, disruption of blood flow to brain, which can lead to brain damage), hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side (affect movement/sensation on one side of body). Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed after a significant weight loss for one of three residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident R75). Review of facility policy Recording the Weight of Each Resident, dated 2024, revealed if the resident's weight has 5% or greater change from the previous month the nursing staff is responsible to re-weigh the resident within 48 hours. If after the re-weight is completed, the resident shows a 5% weight gain or loss, the dietitian will notify the IDT and complete proper documentation. The nursing staff or designee will alert the appropriate individuals of significant changes. Clinical record review revealed Resident R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included congestive heart failure (CHF-affects your heart's ability to pump blood), malnutrition (diet does not provide enough nutrients or the right balance for optimal health) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for eight of eight residents reviewed (Resident R16, R48, R82, R88, R416, R4, R1 ) Findings Include: Review of facility policy dated November 2023 Enhanced Barrier Precautions revealed it is the policy of the facility to use enhanced barrier precautions with residents who are at risk for acquisition and colonization of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO's). The use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions is indicated during high contact resident care activities for residents with chronic wounds and/or indwelling devices regardless of MDRO colonization. A review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (neurogenic bladder, the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function is disrupted by injury or disease).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included the information necessary to properly care for a resident within 48 hours of admission for two of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R69) Findings include: Facility policy titled Baseline Care Plan (2024), indicated that This facility will develop an initial person-centered care plan within the first forty-eight (48) hours of admission for every resident. The Baseline Care Plan will provide instructions for care of the resident. Completion and implementation of the Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among all facility staff members, increase resident safety and safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur in the immediate days after admission prior to development of the Comprehensive Care Plan and to ensure the resident and representative are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify, implement, monitor, and modify interventions consistent with the resident's needs for one of two residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R52). Findings Include: Review of facility policy dated January 16, 2024, Recording The Weight of Each Resident revealed if a resident shows a 5% weight gain or loss, the Dietitian should be notified. Any resident with a significant weight loss should be included on the 24 hour report for that day. Review of Resident R52's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated March 13, 2024, revealed Resident R52 had moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of weakness and Cerebral Vascular Accident. Observation of Resident R52 on October 15, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. revealed Resident R52 had bilateral hand tremors. Interview with Resident R52 on October 15, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for two of five residents reviewed for monthly medication review. (Resident R6 and R34). Findings Include: Review of the policy Medication Regimen Review dated June 28, 2019, revealed that the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review at least monthly. Findings and recommendations are reported to the Director of Nursing and Attending Physician. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or prescriber. Physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. Review of Resident R6's medical record revealed that resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (general term for a decline in cognitive function). A review of the consultant pharmacist report for Resident R6 on July 21, 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies, information provided by the facility, and clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff report an alleged violation involving an injury of unknown origin within the required timeframe for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 21). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 21, dated December 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was observed by the nursing assistant with bluish discoloration above left eyebrow ridge. It measured 1.5 centimeter (cm) x 2.5 cm, and the area was slightly elevated. Review of facility investigation dated December 7, 2023, at 4:30 p.m., revealed that the nursing assistant reported bruise to left eyebrow ridge measured 1. 5cm x 2. 5cm. The bruise was dark purple in color. Resident stated he was punched in the face by the person that took me to the get my hair cut. Further review of investigation revealed a statement by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E14, indicated she observe the bruise before lunch time when she was assisting nurse aide, Employee E15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included continuous oxygen administration for one of 33 residents reviewed (R41) Findings include: Review of Resident R41's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Heart Failure (a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood for the body's needs. This can happen if the heart can't fill up with enough blood. It can also happen when the heart is too weak to pump properly), Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm; it can lead to blood clots in the heart, increases the risk of stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications), Acute Kidney Failure (a sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that happens within a few hours or a few days, it causes a build-up of waste products in the blood and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-02 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and clinical records review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that that physician orders were followed related to urinary catheter size for one of one residents reviewed with a urinary catheter. (Resident R42) Findings include: Review of Resident R42's clinical record revealed that Resident R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment; symptoms include forgetfulness, limited social skills, and thinking abilities so impaired that it interferes with daily functioning), Major Depressive Disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), Anxiety Disorder and Malignant Neoplasm of Right Female Breast (The term malignant means the tumor is cancerous and is likely to spread (metastasize) beyond its point of origin). Review of physician order dated December 1, 2023, for Resident R42, indicated an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA