No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tucker House Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

1001 Wallace Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (215) 235-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 235-1600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
850 N 11th St Fl 1 Rm 148 · (215) 769-2155 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
600 N 11th St · (267) 639-4005 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1300 Ridge Ave · (215) 765-4140 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1000 Wallace St · (215) 763-1502

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.5%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.4%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.2%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.3%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.4%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine2.6%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.7%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.751.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.391.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.4%CMS range 31.1–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.7–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.2–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 169.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and staff, a review clinical records, review of facility policy and documents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free from misappropriation of resident property related to medication given to another resident for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R4). Findings include: A review of the Administering Medications Policy, Reviewed on December 11, 2024, revealed that medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident, unless permitted by State law and facility policy, and approved by the Director of Nursing Services. Further review of this policy revealed the individual administering medications must verify the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: Checking identification band; Checking photograph in PCC; Calling resident by name; and if necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel. Interview with Resident R1 on May 18, 2026, at 11:15 a.m. revealed that when his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for five of nine residents reviewed (Residents R1, R5, R6, R9, R10, R12 and R13).Findings include: A review of the Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray Evaluation form- revealed that the hot foods should be served at or above 135 degrees, and the cold beverage and dessert should be served at or below 50 degrees. During a tour of the facility on May 18, 2026, the following resident interviews were obtained: Interview with Resident R1 at 12:05 p.m. revealed that he does not like the food, it is overprocessed to the point that you don't know what you're eating, it makes me sick to my stomach. Interview with Resident R5 at 11:35 a.m. revealed that she thought that the food was really bad, it is always cold. I am a diabetic and I can't have apple juice, it shoots up my blood sugar, and that is what they send me. I am a brittle diabetic and on Friday they did not send me my evening snack. Interview with Resident R6 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program. Findings include: A review of the facility Pest Control policy revised on September 27, 2024, revealed that it states that the facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Interview with Resident R5 on May 18, 2026, at 11:35 a.m. revealed that pests were a problem and that she saw a mouse about a month ago in her room. Interview with Resident R8 on May 18, 2026, at 11:47 a.m. revealed that pest are an ongoing problem she sees bugs and heard about mice too. Interview with Resident R13 on May 18, 2026, at 11:58 a.m. revealed that mice are an issue, he sees them running around from the hall into his room, they need to get rid of them. Interview with Resident R1 on May 18, 2026, at 12:05 p.m. revealed that he was concerned about an infestation of cockroaches and mice in the building,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy and clinical record review, the facility failed to maintain and protect personal privacy and dignity while providing care to one of nine residents observed. (Resident R7)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Dignity dated April 1, 2022, revealed that all residents shall be cared for in a way that promotes quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Staff must treat residents respectfully, supporting personal choices in grooming, clothing, and activities, while always maintaining privacy and confidentiality. Personal spaces and belongings are protected, and bodily privacy is preserved during personal care and medical procedures. Clinical information is shared discreetly, with sensitive details posted only when necessary for safety, and isolation or precaution status indicated without revealing specific infections. Communication should be respectful, using residents' chosen names, explaining procedures, and keeping them informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for one of one activities personnel files reviewed (Employee E7). Findings include: Review of the facility's Department Heads Contact List revealed that Employee E7 was listed as the Therapeutic Recreation Director. Review of Employee E7's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on March 17, 2025, as the Activities Director. Continued review revealed that the job description signed by Employee E7 on March 17, 2025, revealed The Activities Director assumes administrative authority, responsibility and accountability for the provision of a program of therapeutic activities designed to meet the interests and enhance the functional abilities and self-esteem of each resident. Continued review of Employee E7's personnel file revealed that the employee previously worked as a cook and as a housekeeper. Further review revealed that there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide care according to professional standards of practice for one of 32 residents reviewed related to hypoglycemia management. (Resident R3) Findings include:Review of facility policy 'hypoglycemic management,' revised February 24, 2025, indicates that The licensed nurse will monitor and evaluate for signs of hypoglycemia. These signs may be different for individual patients and may be identified by the patient or responsible party during interview. Signs of hypoglycemia may include diaphoresis, tremors, pallor, tachycardia, cold, clammy skin, lightheadedness, dizziness, changes in vision.Further review of policy indicates that The licensed nurse will follow a standard protocol for diabetic patients. The protocol will be followed unless specific physician orders direct otherwise. This protocol includes: The licensed nurse will complete a finger stick on a patient who is experiencing signs of hypoglycemia. Finger stick blood sugar less than 60:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documentation, interview with staff and review of clinical records it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide appropriate supervision during smoking break and during Hoyer lift transfer for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R7, R111)Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Dated October 24,2022, revealed the facility is committed to ensuring all residents are free from abuse common neglect, and harm. Neglect is recognized as a form of abuse and occurs when they facility, its staff, or service providers fail to provide necessary goods or services, placing residents at risk of physical harm, pain, or emotional distress. this includes Indifference or disregard for resident care, comfort, or safety, whether from a single incident or a pattern of failures, including not following proper procedures. all staff receive ongoing training to prevent abuse and neglect, and residents are monitored to maintain a safe, protective environment.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed for pain management. (Resident R8) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Pain Management Program dated October 16, 2024 revealed the facility must ensure that each resident receives care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to effectively manage pain, ensuring that pain does not interfere with the residents functioning or quality of life.Further review of the facilities policy stated that pain assessments are to be completed upon a mission, on a routine basis, and whenever there's a change in the residence condition or behavior that may indicate pain. The policy emphasizes that all pain management should be individualized to meet the specific needs of each resident, incorporating both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Non drug approaches such as repositioning application of heat or cold, relaxation techniques, or other comfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy/protocols, and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to store drugs and biologicals according to professional standards of practice in two of two medication storage rooms observed (2nd floor and 3rd floor units) Findings include:Review of facility policy 'Medication Storage,' reviewed December 17, 2024, indicates that medication preparation and storage areas will have sufficient lighting, and medications requiring refrigeration will be stored in a refrigerator that is maintained between 2 - 8 degrees Celsius ( 36 to 46 degrees F) . temperatures will be checked daily to ensure it is within the specific range. If temperature is out of range, the refrigerator thermostat will be adjusted.Review of 'Refrigerator temperature control log,' for month of October 2025, on 3rd floor unit, indicated that The RN (Registered Nurse) or LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) will check and record the refrigerator temp. every shift, initial and sign. Temp (F- Fahrenheit) should be between 36 degrees - 46 degrees F. If out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R24, R79, R32, and R63). Findings include: A review of the undated Bedrock Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray Evaluation form revealed that the acceptable temperature range for hot food and beverages was greater than 135 degrees and for cold food and beverage was 50 degrees or less and for milk 45 degrees or less. Interview with Resident R24 on September 29, 2025, at 11:15 a.m revealed that she did not like a lot of the food that they serve. Interview with Resident R79 on September 29, 2025, at 11:23 a.m. revealed that she can't eat the meals, that the food is really bad, and that all she is able to eat is the chicken noodle soup and they don't always have that. Interview on September 29, 2025, at 10:29 a.m. Resident R63 stated that the food was served cold, the meats were rubbery, that the coffee doesn't taste good and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department (FSD) was conducted on September 29, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director, which revealed the following: Observations in the area near the compacting dumpster revealed a large blue container (10 gallons) of roofing adhesive, a case of four silver pouches of roofing sealant with 6 long screws and several tubes of roofing caulk. Also, a large pile of old resident equipment including a bedside commode, wheelchair, leg rests, walker, bedside nightstand and a microwave oven piled up next to the trash compactor. Observation in the dry food storage room revealed a large cardboard box of dishware sitting directly on the floor. Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed no thermometer to monitor temperatures. Observation in the walk-in cooler revealed a stainless-steel pan of cooked roast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that trash and recyclables were properly disposed of in the receiving and dumpster area.Findings include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on September 29, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director, (FSD) which revealed the following: Observations in the area near the compacting dumpster revealed a large blue container (10 gallons) of roofing adhesive, a case of four silver pouches of roofing sealant with 6 long screws and several tubes of roofing caulk. Also, a large pile of old resident equipment including a bedside commode, wheelchair, leg rests, walker, bedside nightstand and a microwave oven piled up next to the trash compactor. Interview with the FSD on September 29, 2025, at 9:50 a.m. confirmed the above findings. Interview with the Administrator on September 29, 2025, at 1:20 p.m. confirmed that the facility recently had roof work completed and that these chemicals and other debris should not be left outside of the dumpster. 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were knowledgeable of smoking policies during one of one smoke breaks observed (September 30, 2025, morning smoke break). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Smoking Safety Policy dated October 3, 2024, revealed, It is the facility policy to provide a safe environment for our residents, staff and visitors by defining and enforcing safe smoking practices. Continued review revealed, The facility will maintain safety equipment near and/or at the designated smoking area: emergency fire blanket, fire extinguisher . [and] aprons for residents if they are not on their possession. Review of the facility's smokers list revealed that four residents required smoking aprons, including Resident R83. Observation on September 30, 2025, at 9:31 a.m. of the morning smoke break revealed that Resident R83 was smoking in the designated smoking area. Resident R83 had a cigarette hanging from her lips while seated in her wheelchair with her hands resting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of resident clinical record, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the ordering physician of a critical laboratory results for one of eight resident records reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, 'Clinical Guideline; Labs and Diagnostics', dated 2021, without date and Month, indicated; 'Facility staff will notify the ordering prescriber of results that are outside of clinical reference ranges or per prescribers' order. The prescriber or designee prescriber will sign and date that notification has occurred, and this can be done manually or by e-signature, if available'.Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that Resident R2 was admitted in the facility on August 30, 2025. Resident R2's diagnoses included Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified site of Right Female Breast (commonly known as breast cancer, is a cancerous tumor that develops in breast tissue. These tumors are characterized by their ability to grow rapidly, invade surrounding tissues, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with residents and staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that facility failed to ensrue that residents' clothing was properly identified for two of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1, and Resident R2) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Laundry Services - Personal Clothing, Handling,' unknown date, indicates that all resident clothing must be labeled clearly with the resident's name upon admission or upon new clothing being brought in, and personal clothing is separated from facility linens. Interview with Resident R1and Resident R1's relative, on fourth floor unit, at 11:45 am, revealed that he has been waiting to receive his personal laundry for about two weeks. Interview with facility's laundry aides, Employee E3 and E4, on [DATE] at 12:10 p.m., revealed that delayed personal laundry services has been an ongoing issue, stating that nurse aides need to label residents' clothing otherwise we will wait until someone complains and asks for their belongings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the consulting pest control reports, , and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the resident care areas for three of three nursing floors. (2nd floor, 3rd Floor and 4th floor) Findings include: An observation of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on December 27, 2024, at 10:56 a.m. with Employee E4, Nurse Aide, revealed that there were live roaches inside the drawer of nightstand. There was also dead roaches inside and around the night stand. Dark colored numerous tiny spots were observed inside the drawer which appeared like roach/pest droppings. Resident room was observed with trash, food particles on the floor. Interview with Resident R1 on December 27, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. stated he saw a mice came out of the wall that morning. Resident pointed to a whole in baseboard to indicate the location where the mice came out. Interview with Resident R1 on December 27, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan related to mobility, vision, and pressure ulcers for four of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R65, R1, and R102). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Baseline Care Plan, Comprehensive Care Plan and Ongoing Care Plan Updates dated April 1, 2022, revealed the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. The comprehensive care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of Resident R65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 21, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R85, R89). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plans (dated April 2022) indicated that the interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan when there has been a change in the resident's condition. Clinical record review revealed Resident R85 was admitted to the facility August 3, 2023 with a diagnosis that included but not limited to diabetes mellitus (chronic disease that causes high blood sugar levels), anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of Resident R85's clinical record revealed Resident R85 had a significant weight loss from June 2024 through November 2024. Further review of Resident R85's clinical record revealed an order, dated October 08, 2024, for two house shakes a day for weight loss. Review of Resident R85's care plan revealed interventions that included one house shake to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R65). Findings Include: Review of Resident R65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 21, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side and muscle weakness. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident R65 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident R65's comprehensive care plan revised August 25, 2021, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to decreased mobility. Intervention revised on September 30, 2019, included to check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. Review of Resident R65's nursing [NAME] (a documentation system that enables nurses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services for incontinence management for one of five residents reviewed with incontinence concerns (Resident R137). Findings include: Review of Resident R137's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (a condition that occurs when the nerves and muscles that control the bladder don't work properly. This can be caused by damage to the brain, spinal cord, or nerves, and can lead to a loss of bladder control). Review of physician order for Resient R137, dated October 24, 2024, indicated an order for urinary Foley catheter size 16FR (french)/10ML. On November 12, 2024, at 11:07 a.m., it was observed that Resident R137 had a Foley Catheter of 18FR/10ML. At the time of the finding, confirmed the same Employee E4, a Registered Nurse. 28 Pa Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate and address the nutrition needs of each resident in a timely manner for two of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R84 and R107). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention dated February 15, 2022, revealed the nursing staff and the Registered Dietitian will cooperate to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents. Further review of facility policy revealed if a weight loss is significant, the Registered Dietitian should discuss with the interdisciplinary team and make recommendations. Per the facility policy, significant weight change is defined as more or less than 5% within 30 days, and more or less than 10% within 6 months. Review of Resident R84's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 5, 2024, revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents consistent with standards of professional practice for one of one resident reviewed for pain (Resident R70). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Administering Pain Medication dated April 1, 2022, revealed the purpose of the policy was to provide guidelines for assessing the resident's level of pain prior to administering pain medications. Review of facility policy revealed staff should obtain the location and intensity of the pain. Staff should evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and administer pain medications as ordered. Further review of facility policy revealed staff should document per facility protocol in the resident's electronic health record. Review of Resident R70's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 7, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the resident's possible triggers that may cause re-traumatization related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of one resident sampled with a diagnosis of PTSD. (Resident R 81) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include suicidal ideations, major depressive disorder, and (PTSD) Further review of the clinical record for Resident R81 revealed that the resident was sexually and physically abused by his father as a child. Resident R81's current care plan on August 29, 2024, revealed a care plan for PTSD. Further review of the care plan failed to identify possible triggers that may cause re-traumatization. Interview with the Director of Nursing, Employee E1, on October 18, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. confirmed that Resident R81's plan of care for PTSD did not identify the resident's possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to hand hygiene during one of the six Medication Administration Reviews, and during peg tube dressing change for one of one resident review with a feeding tube Findings include: Review of facility policy title Hand Hygiene, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), indicated that the staff will follow established infection control procedures such as hand washing, antiseptic technique, gloves, and isolation precautions for administration of medications, care, and treatments, as applicable. Observation conducted during medication administration to Resident R 85 on November 13, 2024, 9:11 a.m., with Licensed nurse, Employee E5, revealed that with bare hands Employee E5, touched the drawer of the medication cart, computer mouse, and medication-blister-pack; and without disinfecting her hands; the employee picked up medication tablet, Olanzapine Oral Tablet 10 milligram, and Klonopin Oral Tablet 0.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assure an ongoing collaboration with the dialysis facility for the provision medications as ordered by the physician before and after hemodialysis treatment for one of one residents on renal dialysis. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications dated April 1, 2022 revealed that the licensed nurse was responsible for administering and documenting in the clinical record the administration of medications and treatments according to the orders, in required time frames, as set forth by the physician. A review of the policy titled Dialysis dated April 1, 2022 revealed that it was the facility's responsibility to ensure that the dialysis services were managed so that each resident attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The policy indicated that it was the responsibility of the facility to ensure that the resident's needs related to dialysis treatment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident care areas and personal belongings in a clean and homelike environment for three of three nursing units (2nd, 3rd, and 4th floor Nursing Units). Findings Include: Observations on January 26, 2024, at 11:50 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the floors were sticky to touch and there was a red juice stain next to the window bed. Further observations revealed Resident R115's wheelchair was dirty with significant build-up of food/debris along the frame of the chair. Observations on January 26, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed residents seated in the 3rd floor dining room and lunch was about to start. The floors were observed to be dirty from breakfast with breakfast food spillage and wrappers on the floor. Further observations revealed a breakfast tray was left out on a table in the corner of the room. Observations on January 29, 2024, at 11:15 a.m. in the 3rd floor dining room revealed spillage stains on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse to the state agency as required for two of four abuse allegations reviewed (Resident R22 and R32). Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy Abuse revealed allegations of abuse are reported per Federal and State Law. Further review of facility policy revealed the facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency. If an allegation is considered reportable, the designee will make an initial (immediate or within 24 hours) report to the State Agency. A follow up investigation will be submitted to the State Agency within five working days. Review of facility documentation revealed an incident report with a witness statement by Registered Nurse, Employee E14, dated May 24, 2023, that the 4th floor unit manager reported that Resident R22 alleged that a nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and through investigation to rule about abuse and/or neglect for an injury of an unknown origin for 1 out of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R32). Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Abuse policy indicated that during the investigation of injuries of unknown origin or suspicious injuries must be immediately investigated to rule out abuse. The policy also indicated that when an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the administrator or designee investigation will include the following: investigating who was involved, obtaining witness statements, resident statements, resident roommate statements, in addition to other investigative areas. Continued review of the policy indicated that during the investigation of injuries of unknown origin or suspicious injuries must immediately investigated to rule out abuse. The policy also indicated that when an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understood after a selected resident was transferred to the hospital for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents R22 and R471). Findings include: Review of Resident R22's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on September 4, 2023, after a fall and October 28, 2023, due to lung cancer. Further review of Resident R22's clinical record failed to reveal documentation of a written hospital transfer notice provided by the facility to the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman. Review of Resident R471's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on November 4, 2023, January 3, 2024, and January 27, 2024, related to Resident R471 having Hematemesis (vomiting of blood). Further review of Resident R471's clinical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident had a physician order for a wander guard for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R62). Findings Include: Review of Resident R62's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated November 3, 2023, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Further review of the MDS revealed Resident R62 had severe cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident R62's comprehensive nursing evaluation, Section 11. Elopement Risk, dated January 3, 2024, revealed the resident was not at risk for elopement. Observations on January 29, 2024, at 2:10 p.m. with licensed nurse, Employee E13, revealed Resident R62 had a wander guard on the right wrist. Interview with licensed nurse, Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, observations, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and were free from accidents and hazards related to smoking, mechanically altered diets, and resident safety (Resident R40, R105, and 162). Findings include: Review of facility policy Smoking Safety, revised October 2022, revealed residents who smoke will be permitted to smoke in the designated outside smoking area. Residents must agree to and comply with the safe smoking practices and the conditions of the Smoking Safety Policy and Procedure. Residents will be assessed after admission by Nursing/ Social Services/designee and at a minimum, annually. Further review of facility policy revealed noncompliance with the safe smoking practices could pose significant negative impact on the safety of all residents and staff. Violations include smoking in areas not designated for smoking. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper care of indwelling urinary catheter and tubing for two of two residents observed with urinary catheters. (Residents R16 and Resident R59). Findings include: According to the facilities Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated April 1, 2022, all 'catheter tubing and drainage bags are to be kept off the floor'. Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed an admission date of November 9, 2021, with diagnoses that included retention of urine. A physician order was obtained on April 24, 2023, for the use of an indwelling foley catheter. Observation made on January 26, 2024, at 10:36 a.m. revealed that Resident R16's urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing extended out and lying directly on the floor underneath the bed. Observation conducted of Resident R59 on January 26, 2024, at 10:45 a.m. revealed that Resident R59 was laying in bed with the urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing extended out and lying directly on the floor. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring to identify and apply relevant approaches to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of six residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R78). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention revised February 15, 2022, revealed the nursing staff and Dietitian will cooperate to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents. Review of facility policy indicated the registered dietitian will review monthly weights by the 10th of the month to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be assessed and addressed by the registered dietitian whether or not the definition of significant weight change is met. Continued review of facility policy revealed significant weight changes are defined as: more or less than 5% within 30 days; and more or less than 10% within 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding practices related to labeling for one of three residents reviewed for tube feedings (Resident R74). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Enteral Feeding dated last revised January 2, 2021, revealed that, tube feeding formula will be labeled with residents name, date and time hung'. It also revealed that syringes should be dated and labeled with the resident name. Review of care plan for R74 revealed the use of tube feed related to dysphasia. Observation on January 2, 2024, at 11:29 a.m. revealed Resident R74 resting in bed. Next to his bed hanging in a feeding pump was an opened, undated, unlabeled bottle of tube feed. On the bedside table, rested 3 opened, undated, unlabeled syringe bottles. Interview, at the time of the observation, the Director of Nursing confirmed that it is the expectation of nurses to label, date and time all tube feed and supplies. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents for one nursing staff reviewed (Employee E8) Findings Include: Review of nurse aide, Employee E8's, personnel file revealed the nurse aide was hired by the facility on October 10, 2023. Further review of nurse aide, Employee E8's, personnel file revealed no competencies were available to ensure the nurse aide was competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents needs including activities of daily living such as personal hygiene, transfers, and mobility. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, and Regional Registered Nurse, Employee E4 on January 31, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. confirmed that there was no documentation available to review to show that licensed nursing staff had been evaluated for competencies. 201.20 (b) Staff development. 201.20 (d) Staff development.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medically related social services were provided to a resident who was cognitively impaired, and the recommendation of guardianship was made, to ensure treatment and care concerns were being made in the best interest of the resident, for 1 out of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R120). Findings include: Review of the January 2024 physician orders for Resident R120 included the following diagnosis: cerebral infarction (a stroke); dysphasia (difficulty swallowing); cognitive communication deficit (a type of communication problem that affects an individual's cognition, which involves problems with thinking, remembering, judging and problem-solving); peripheral vascular disease (a condition in which an individual's narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to an individual's arms or legs); acquired absence of the left leg above the knee ( left leg amputation above the knee). Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented that the pharmacist's identified irregularities were reviewed and failed to document the action taken or not taken to address the irregularities for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R14). Findings Include: Surveyor requested the policy regarding monthly medication reviews on January 31, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. Subsequently the facility provided the policy Drug Regimen Free From Unnecessary Drugs, revised October 24, 2022. Review of facility policy Drug Regimen Free From Unnecessary Drugs revealed the policy did not address the time frames for steps in medication regimen review or steps the pharmacist must take when an irregularity requires urgent action. Review of Resident R14's clinical record revealed clinical notes by the consultant pharmacist dated 8/8/2023, 9/12/2023, 9/22/2023, and 10/10/2023 that the medication regimen was reviewed. Recommendations were made to prescriber and to see medication regimen review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident electronic signatures on admission documents were safeguarded to prevent unauthorized use of the signatures for one out of two residents reviewed (Resident R121). Findings include: Review of the Electronic Signature policy dated April 1, 2022, indicted that this policy addressed the usage of electronic signatures for medical records and agreements throughout the operations of the facility. Continued review of the policy indicated that when electronic signatures are used, safeguards to prevent unauthorized access, reconstruct information, and minimize fraud must be in place. The policy indicated that safeguards included but are not limited to (1) Verification of a person's identity before assigning the unique qualifier (2) System security roles to control what sections/areas individuals can access or enter data based on the individual's role, security role and unique identifier (3) A specific computer lock out time that is activated when there has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment needed for resident care was in safe operating condition. Findings Include: A tour of the facility on October 26, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. it was revealed that there were serval pieces of broken equipment in the facility. Interview with Licensed nurse, Employee E6 on October 24, 2023, at 12:14 p.m. revealed we need new equipment. Employee E6 revealed the facility only has two or three working hoyer lifts for the entire facility and sometimes people have to wait to get care. Observation of the second floor shower room on October 24, 2023 at 11:15 a.m. revealed one sit to stand broken in the shower room area and one hoyer lift broken in the shower room area not being used. Observation on the third floor on October 24, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. revealed a hoyer lift in the hallway with the battery exposed with a piece of tape attached. Licensed nurse, Employee E7 attempted to place the battery in to turn the weight scale on but it would not work. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to complete weekly weights for a resident with a significant weight loss for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of Resident R1 Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs) dated June 28, 2023, revealed the diagnoses of hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high [140/90 mmHg or higher]), cellulitis of lower left lower limb (a deep infection of the skin caused by bacteria), hyperlipidemia, hyperkalemia (an elevated level of lipids like cholesterol and triglyceride in your blood), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (is an exaggerated defense response of the body to a noxious stressor), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of clinical records revealed a physician order for weekly weights on Monday for four weeks starting October 2, 2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the food and nutrition services, review of facility policy, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food at safe and appetizing temperatures on one of three nursing floors (Third floor) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Food Temperatures dated January 17, 2019 states, 2. All cold food items must be maintained and served at a temperature of 41 degrees or below. Further review of the policy states 6. Food sent to the units for distribution (such as meals, snacks, nourishments, oral supplements) will be transported and delivered to maintain temperatures at or below 50 degrees for cold foods and at or above 125 degrees for hot foods. Point of service temperatures should be palatable to the taste. Observation of signage on the Third floor stated that lunch starts at 12:15 p.m. and ends at 1:15 p.m. Observation of the Third-floor dining hall revealed the food arrived on the unit to the tray line at 12:10 p.m. Observation revealed several times Director of Dining,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical records, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper documentation regarding treatment and services for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy dated January 3, 2022 Refusal of Care states, Residents have a right to refuse any portion of their plan of care. However, since the refusal may be harmful to the resident's health and well being the interdisciplinary team will make every effort to obtain complaint with the plan of care. Further review revealed, If the resident continues to refuse, the refusal is documented in the medical record. The refusal and reason are documented in the electronic medical record. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident's care needs) dated June 28, 2023 revealed diagnoses of hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high [140/90 mmHg or higher]), cellulitis of lower left lower limb (a deep infection of the skin caused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of housekeeping aide's job description, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, homelike environment in one of three nursing units. (4th Floor) Findings include: Review of the housekeeping service aide job description revealed that the housekeeping aide provides cleaning services to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, staff and the public. The essential duties and responsibilities included to clean (dust, dry mop, wet mop, sanitize, scrub) assigned resident rooms, bathroom and common areas daily according to facility procedures. Clean walls, ceilings, windows, mirrors, waxes floors according to department procedures and cleaning schedules, disposes of trash and waste, including bio-hazards waste and other materials that require special handling. Observations conducted during a tour of the 4th floor on October 15, 2023, between 5:45 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. revealed the following: -on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of pest control documentation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in one of three nursing units. (4th floor). Findings include: Observations conducted on October 15, 2023 between 5:45 p.m.- 7:00 p.m. revealed the following: -7 dead bugs were observed laying on the floor at the head of the B-bed. -there was a soiled blanket on the floor of room [ROOM NUMBER], upon opening the door a number of naps were observed flying on top of the blanket and inside the bathroom. -there was a live roach crawling on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. -a live roach was observed inside the bathtub in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The above findings were confirmed at the time of the observation with Licensed nurse, Employee E3. - live live roaches were observed running around room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview with Resident R4 at the time of the observation revealed that the resident confirmed that roaches are always in the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and family and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an indwelling catheter received timely care for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of bladder dysfunction. Review of Resident R1's October 2023, physician orders revealed an order for a Foley catheter to straight drainage every shift due to urinary retention, size 14/10 French. Family interview conducted on October 15, 2023, at 6:10 p.m. revealed that the the family member was concern with the urine bag from the urinary catheter being completely full and laying on the floor. Observations conducted at the time of the family interview confirmed that Resident R1's urinary catheter bag was completely full and laying directly on the floor underneath the resident's bed. Resident R1 was observed in bed. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional and sanitary environment on one of three nursing units (4th Floor) Findings include: Observations conducted of the 4th Floor on October 15, 2023, between 5:45 p.m.-7:00 p.m. revealed the following: -the toilet paper holder was missing in the bathrooms of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. -the toilet tank cover was removed from the toilet in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] and there were feces in the toilet. -the toilet located inside the central shower room had a sign posted indicating that the toilet was out of order and feces were left on the toilet. The above findings were confirmed with Licensed nurse, Employee E3 at the time of the observations. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with their personal belongings once discharged from the facility for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Inventory of Resident Personal Belongings/Property, with a revision date of July 1, 2023, states that the facility will inventory and record all personal clothing and property belonging to each resident. Review of the policy also indicated that the purpose of the policy was to review the facility requirement for all resident personal items to be properly labeled and accounted for. Continued review of the policy stated that all items brought in for the resident must be taken to the receptionist and the receptionist/designee will complete an inventory by the resident/responsible party (if possible) and documented in the note section of the software. Continued review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline plan of care was developed for 1 resident reviewed related to a resident's history of suicide attempts and bereavement for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Baseline Care Plan, Comprehensive Care Plan an Ongoing Care Plan Update, dated April 1, 2022 indicated that the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care. The policy also indicated that the baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and include the minimum health care information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services and PASARR recommendations if applicable. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed by the physician prior to going out on leave of absences from the facility for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2 and Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Leave of Absence, with a revision date of October 22, 2022 indicated that it is the policy of the facility to coordinate, when appropriate, the preparation for and return from a leave of absence including, but no limited to physical, medical and medication needs of the resident. The policy stated that upon being informed of a request for a leave of absence, the nurse will ensure that there is a physician's order, perform any education needed and complete a plan of care. The policy also stated that the physician will provide an order for leave of absences (independent leave of absences-with no family or staff and supervised leave of abuse (with family or staff). The policy stated that residents admitted with substance abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-05-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident had reasonable access to their personal funds for one of one clinical record reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust Policy, dated April 1, 2022 revealed upon the discharge, eviction, or death of resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility shall convey within 90 days the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the resident, or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with State law. Reviewing Resident CL1's clinical record revealed that Resident CL1 was discharge from the facility and transferred to a different facility on November 30, 2023. Interview with the business office, Employee E3 on May 16, 2024, at 12:13 p.m., provided resident account documentation and confirmed that the Resident CL1's account was closed on February 1, 2024, it was late and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$507K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 3%Other / private 3%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $507K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$296per resident / day
operating cost
$9,004per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$249per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395461. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next