Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park
8401 Roosevelt Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19152 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (215) 624-5800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,015 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 28.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.2%CMS range 42.5–61.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.8–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 28.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 18.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 21.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 15.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.0–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, incident/accident documents, staff training records as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was free of neglect by failing to have sufficient staff during a mechanical lift transfer. This failure resulted in actual harm for Resident R1 who fell, sustaining multiple skin damage to the left forearm, experienced severe pain, and bruising to the head and face and required transfer to the hospital for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of undated facility document, Use of a mechanical lifting machine revealed All C.N.As (Certified Nurse Aides) must read residents Kardex and get report from charge nurse prior to giving care to the residents. The Kardex will show level of care for residents, any special equipment and behavior issues. General Guidelines 1. At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. 2. Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks that require: a. Lifting a resident from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, incident/accident documents, staff training records as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and failed to ensure safe transfer techniques were used during a transfer via mechanical lift. This failure resulted in actual harm for Resident R1 who sustained multiple skin damage to the left forearm, experienced severe pain, and bruising to the head and face and required transfer to the hospital for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of undated facility document Use of a mechanical lifting machine, revealed All C.N.As (Certified Nurse Aides) must read residents Kardex and get report from charge nurse prior to giving care to the residents. The Kardex will show level of care for residents, any special equipment and behavior issues. General Guidelines 1. At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. 2. Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure complete documentation related to pressure ulcers treatment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of facility policy 'Wound Care,' revised in October 2010, indicates that the following information is to be documented in residents' medical record post wound treatments:1. The type of wound care given2. The date and time the wound care was given3. The position in which the resident was placed4. The name and title of the individual performing wound care5. Any change in the resident's condition6. All assessment data (i.e., wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound7. How the resident tolerated the procedure8. Any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure9. If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why.10. The signature and title of the person recording the data.And notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the wound care.Review of Resident R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, General HACCP Guidelines for Food Safety undated, indicate that all food must be dated and put away promptly. Continued review revealed rapid cooling instructions included, place cooling items on top shelf or refrigerator in 2-inch shallow pans and stir every 15 to 60 minutes. A tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on September 8, 2025, at 10:12 a.m. with Employee E8, Food Service Director (FSD), revealed the following concerns: Five packages of ground beef (10-15 lbs.) were undated and unlabeled; two packages of beef hot dogs (10lbs) were undated and unlabeled; 3 trays of hashbrowns were uncovered and undated; a container of provolone cheese was expired, dated September 9/6; American cheese was expired, dated 9/6; cup up onions expired , dated 9/6; diced potatoes cooling in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and an interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings include:On September 8, 2025, at approximately 10:30 a.m. during the receipt of a food delivery, a delivery truck was parked at the facility's receiving dock. Staff were observed walking boxes of food into the kitchen storage areas through the receiving zone. At the same time, the following unsanitary conditions were observed: Three large grey trashcans were uncovered. One trashcan contained trash with a foul odor, with refuse exposed to open air. A foul, white, milky liquid was observed pooling across the receiving area floor. The liquid appeared to be leaking from the trash compactor and had spread into multiple walking and delivery zones used by staff to transport food into the facility. A strong, pervasive odor was present throughout the receiving area, consistent with decomposing waste. Interview with Food Service Director, Employee E8 along duration of the tour confirmed observations of the receiving and dumpster area.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide confidentiality of residents' personal health information during medication administration for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R32 and R60).Findings include:Observation of Medication Administration by Employee E4, Licensed Nurse for Resident R32 on September 9, 2025, at 8:58 a.m. revealed that the nurse prepared and administered the medication in the dining room where 9 other residents and other staff were sitting. Continued observation revealed that the staff administrated the nasal spray after the pills were administered after telling the resident what she was going to administer which was audible across the room.Observation of the Medication Administration by Employee E4, Licensed Nurse for Resident R60 on September 9, 2025, at 9:03 a.m. revealed that the nurse left the medication cart to administer medication for Resident R60 and the computer screen was left open with Resident R60's information including medications visible to anyone passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice notifying them of the transfer and the reason for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. Findings Include:Review of Resident R122's medical records revealed that on July 3, 2025, Resident R122 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Continued review failed to reveal documentation of a written notification to the residents or resident's representative notifying them of the transfer and the reasons for the move in writing. On June 20, 2025, Resident R122 was transferred to the hospital for an emergency evaluation. Continued review failed to reveal documentation of a written notification to the resident or resident's representative notifying them of the transfer and the reasons for the move in writing. On July 1, 2025, Resident R8 was transferred to the hospital due to a fall. Interview with the facility administrator conducted on September 11, 2025, at 11:25 a.m. confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observations, review of professional standards, clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to professional standards of practice one of three residents reviewed (Resident R32)Findings Include:According National Library of Medicine (Operated by the United States federal government, a biomedical library and a national resource for health professionals, scientists, and the public) five rights of medication use: the right patient, the right drug, the right time, the right dose, and the right route-all of which are generally regarded as a standard for safe medication practices.Review of FDA (Food and Drug Administration) guidelines for Tacrolimus (medication for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in de novo kidney transplant patients in combination with other immunosuppressants) extended release tablet revealed instructions to take tacrolimus extended-release tablets once daily with fluid (preferably water) on an empty stomach, at least 1 hour before or at least 2 hours after a meal, at the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate inventory record for two of two residents reviewed. (Resident R12, R36)Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Living Reporting Grievances, last revised March 27, 2017, revealed that it is designed to ensure that each resident, responsible person, or resident agent has an opportunity to express their concern or grievance and that a system is in place for them to be heard and their concern resolved.Review of the clinical record for Resident R36, who was admitted on [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Resident R36's wife, Resident R12, who was admitted on [DATE], had a BIMS score of 99, which indicates that the resident was unable to participate in the assessment due to severe cognitive impairment.On September 8, 2025, at 11:34 a.m., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for one of one staff educational records reviewed. (Employee E3). Finding include: Review of facility investigation dated April 23, 2025, revealed Resident R1 had a fall while he/she was being transferred from the wheelchair to the bed, charge nurse found the resident lying on the floor in a supine position with hands on (his/her) sides and legs stretched out. Nurse Aide, Employee E3, reported the resident fell because the sling on the pad broke off. Interview with the Employee E2, Director of Nursing, on April 24, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. revealed Nurse Aide, Employee E3, used the mechanical lift to transfer Resident R1 by himself without other staff assistance which resulted in injury to Resident R1 when the resident fell out of the mechanical lift. Director of Nursing, Employee E2 indicated there was no issues with the mechanical lift sling after it was inspected by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to re-admit a resident back into the facility after a change in condition for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, with a revision dated of October 2022, indicated that if the resident is being transferred or discharged because his or her needs cannot be met at the facility, documentation will include, but not limited to: the specific resident needs that cannot be met; the facility's attempt to meet those needs; the receiving facility's service(s) that are available to meet those needs, and that an appropriate notice was provided to the resident and/or legal representative from the facility. Review of the March 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the following diagnoses: morbid obesity; transient cerebral ischemic attack (a brief stroke-like attack); hypertension (high blood pressure); cognitive communication deficits; diabetes (a metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it as determined that the facility failed develop a person-centered plan of care for behaviors and refusal of medications for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the March 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of morbid obesity; transient cerebral ischemic attack (a brief stroke-like attack); hypertension (high blood pressure); cognitive communication deficits; diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and a urinary tract infection. Resident was also being treated at the facility for anxiety (intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations); visual hallucinations (seeing people, places and things that do not exist), and disorientation. Review of multidisciplinary notes from January 14, 2025 through March 3, 2025 documented various behaviors that included, kicking staff, scratching staff, yelling, screaming uncontrollably and unprovoked. Refusing meals and having a poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed and recommendations were addressed regarding obtaining labs to ensure appropriate care and services could be provided for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of a physician's note dated January 14, 2025 at 9:41 p.m. indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local hospital after being brought to the hospital by his wife after exhibiting signs of increased confusion at home. The resident was subsequently diagnosed with acute encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain that lead to an altered mental status) and a urinary tract infection. The resident was transferred to the facility for rehabilitation services once discharged from the hospital. Review of the March 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 included the following diagnoses: morbid obesity; transient cerebral ischemic attack (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a recommendation for a resident to be seeen by an endocrinologist was addressed for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of multi-disciplinary notes indicated that the resident had a visit that the resident had with the facility endocrinologist (a physician who specializes in the treatment of diagnosis, such as diabetes) on January 27, 2025 at 1:06 p.m. Recommendations to the residents current treatment plan were made. Continued review of the clinical notes from the endocrinologist indicated that the endocrinologist would follow up with the resident in 2-4 weeks and that the facility could contact the endocrinologist sooner with any questions, concerns, or any changes in the resident's health care status related to diabetes. Will follow up in 2-4 weeks. Please email [name of office] sooner with any questions, concerns or changed in the pts's DM (Diabetes Melittus) control. Review of multidisciplinary notes from January 14, 2025 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the physical environment of the food and nutrition services department and reviews of the pest control operator's reports it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the building was free of pest. Findings include: Observations of the main kitchen revealed a set of double doors in hallway outside the kitchen. These doors opened directly onto the concrete dock. Additional observations revealed a large metal dumpster unit just below the concrete dock; where garbage and refuse was held for later disposal. The double doors did not seal completely upon closing; that was an air gap was evident along the threhold of the doors allowing easy access to the building for pests and rodents. Observations on the second floor B wing nursing unit kitchenette revealed a mouse running across the floor into a hole/void underneath the wooden cabinets. There was obvious water damage surrounding these wooden cabinets inside this kitchenette. A dish machine and sink were noted as part of the kitchenette equipment used for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, reviewof clinical record, review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the care plan for activities of daily leaving for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R32). Findings include: Review of Resident R32's clinical record revealed that the Resident R32 was admitted in the facility on January 16, 2024. Resident R32's diagnoses included, Muscle Weakness, Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and judgment), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of physician order for Resident R32, dated March 13, 2024, indicated an order for Physio-Therapy evaluation and treatment as indicated. Review of the care plan for Resident R32, initiated on January 16, 2024, with a target date of September 8, 2024, indicated that Resident R32 would demonstrate an improvement in Activities of Daily living status through skilled therapy intervention. Review of Resident R32's current care plan revealed that the resident's care plan was not updated or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review ofd facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement of one out of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R80). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Elopement of a Resident effective dated December 12, 2016, revealed that it was the policy of the facility to put measures into place to prevent residents room eloping (leave without staff knowledge) from the facility. The policy defined elopement as the ability of a resident, who is not capable of self-preservation to successfully wander away, walk away, run away, escape, or otherwise leave the facility or environment unsupervised, unnoticed, and/or prior to their scheduled discharge and enter into a harmful situation. Review of the clinical record for Resident R80, revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Anxiety Disorder (a mental illness that causes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physican orders were followed related to an indwelling urinary catheter for one of five residents reviewed with incontinence concerns (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Urinary Tract Infection, Cognitive Communication Deficit (a difficulty with communication that's caused by a disruption in cognitive processes. This can affect a person's ability to speak, listen, read, write, and interact socially) and Depression (a common mental health condition that can impact a person's thoughts, feelings, behavior, and sense of well-being. It's more than just feeling down or having a bad day, and it can interfere with daily activities like sleeping, eating, and working). Review of physician order for Resident R8, dated August 23, 2024, indicated an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of nutritional care and services, interviews with staff, reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and monitor the nutritional status of one of four residents reviewed to ensure that each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status related to usual body weight and laboratory values. (Resident R27) Findings include: A review of the policy titled weight management dated July 15, 2029 revealed that if there was a weight change from the previous weight for a resident that was less five pounds the dietitian was to be notified by the nursing staff. The dietitian was then responsible to conduct a nutritional assessment of the resident and provide interventions for the resident to maintain body weight and meet food and fluid needs daily. A review of the policy titled nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the dietitian in conjunction with the nursing staff and physician were to conduct a comprehensive assessment of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R22) Findings include: Review of Resident R22's clinical record revealed that Resident R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, obesity, Essential Hypertension, Unspecified Fracture of Left Lower Leg. Further review of resident's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated September 26, 2024, for: O2 (oxygen) at 2L via NC (nasal cannula) for Pox (pulse oxygen level) < 92% on room air every shift for Pox < 92% on room air. Observation on Resident R22 conducted during tour of the second-floor unit on October 21, 2024, at 1:04 pm, revealed that Resident R22 was in bed asleep with family member (son) on bedside. Further observation revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure provide documentation of a clinical rationale for the continued administration of an antipsychotic medication and failed to ensure that a gradual dose reduction was attempted for a psychoactive drug for one out of two residents reviewed (Residents R32) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Medication Monitoring and Management, effective dated September 6, 2023, revealed if a resident is admitted on an antipsychotic medication or the facility initiates antipsychotic therapy, the facility must attempt a Gradual Drug Reduction (GDR involves the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued altogether) in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts) within the first year, unless clinically contraindicated. After the first year, a GDR must be attempted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were safely stored for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed that Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Atherosclerosis Heart Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Occlusion and Stenosis of Bilateral Carotid Artery, Essential Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Further review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed the following physician's orders: Aspirin Oral Capsule 81 MG (Aspirin) Give 81 mg by mouth one time a day for CAD (coronary artery disease)-Order Date-September 27, 2023. Lasix Oral Tablet 20 MG (Furosemide) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for LE (lower extremity) edema-Order Date-October 24, 2023. Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG (Metoprolol Tartrate) Give 25 mg by mouth one time a day for HTN (Hypertension) hold for sbp…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, reviews of policies and procedures, and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide as needed dental services for one of 31 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R56) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled dental services dated December 2016 revealed that routine and emergency dental services were provided for all residents to meet their oral health needs. The policy indicated that a dentist provides care to the residents at the facility and was under a contracted agreement to visit the residents monthly and weekly as necessary. The policy indicated the the social worker was responsible for assisting residents with dental appointments and transportation arrangements to a dental office as needed. Clinical record review revealed a comprehensive annual assessment dated [DATE] that indicated Resident R56 was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident R56 at 9:30 a.m., on October 22, 2024 revealed that this resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were accurate for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R32). Findings include: Review of physician order dated March 13, 2024, for Resident R32, indicated an order to change oxygen tubing/cannula/plastic bag and inspect filter and clean or replace if soiled, weekly on Saturdays 11-7 shift; place initials and date changed the tubing that are placed in plastic bags; every night shift every Saturday. Check Pulse Ox every shift; Oxygen: 2 Liters/Minute, As Needed, via Nasal Canula for Pulse Ox below 92% Room Air, As Needed. Observation conducted on October 24, 2024, at 9:07 a.m., of Resident R2, in the presence of a Registered Nurse, Employee E9, revealed that Resident R32 had no oxygen devise placed with him as ordered. Interviewed with Resident R32 at the time of observation, revealed that he was not receiving or in need of any oxygen therapy for a long time. Reviewed the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized way to evaluate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Transmission Based Precautions for one of 13 residents reviewed ((Resident R8). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Infection control Guidelines for all Nursing Procedures, effective dated October 2018, revealed that Transmission Based Precautions will be used whenever measures more stringent than Standard Precautions are needed to prevent the spread of infection. Standard Precautions apply to body fluids. Wear personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent exposure to spills or splashes of body fluids. Observation on October 24, 2024, at 8:46 a.m. revealed that Employee E9, a Registered Nurse (RN) , examined the urinary Foley catheter of Resident R8. Employee E9 did not wear PPE during examinationo of the urinary catheter even though Resident R8 was suggested for Transmission Based Precautions. Employee E9 confirmed not wearing PPE at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with education related to the influenza vaccines prior to administration of the vaccine for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R2, R22, R29, R36, R83 and R115) Findings include: Review of clinical records of Resident R2, Resident R29, Resident R83, Resident R36, Resident R115 and Resident R22 revealed that all six residents were offered and received the flu vaccines for the flu season 2024-2025. Further review of Resident R2, Resident R29, Resident R83, Resident R36, Resident R115 and Resident R22's clinical record, revealed no documented evidence that that Resident R2, Resident R29, Resident R83, Resident R36, Resident R115 and Resident R22 were provided with education related to the influenza vaccines such as the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccines prior to administration of the influenza vaccines. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) Employee E2 conducted on October 24, 2024, at 12:25 p.m. confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the operations of the main dietary kitchen and the six kitchenettes constructed on the nursing units, reviews of manufactures' specifications for the dish machines and interviews with staff, it was determined that essential mechanical equipment used for the food and nutrition services department was not fully operational and safe. Findings include: Observations of the dish machine area equipment inside the main kitchen revealed a dish machine whose manuafacturer's recommendations for safe operation were for hot water to be used for the cleaning and sanitation of dishes utencils bowls cups and every day china. The director of Dietary Services, Employee E3, reported that the booster heater required mechanical equipment (pressure reducing valve on the booster heater) and repair for the dish machine to be maintained safely and in accordance with manufacturer's specified final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations of the second floor B wing nursing unit kitchenette revealed a dish machine that was not maintained according to manufacturer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the nursing assessment tool, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit the readmission of a hospitalized resident without providing evidence that the facility was not able to meet the resident's needs for one of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 106). Findings Include: Review of the facility nursing assessment tool (determines what resources are necessary to care for residents during day-to-day operations and used to make decisions regarding capabilities to provide services to the residents in the facility), reviewed by the facility November 17, 2023, revealed common diagnoses include impaired cognition, mental disorder, and behavior that needs interventions. Further review of the nursing assessment tool revealed the average or range of residents with behavioral health needs was twenty-five. Review of Resident R106's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility, from the hospital, on November 8, 2023, with a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans related to respiratory care, pain management, and falls for four of twenty-four residents reviewed (Resident R97, R76, R102, and R83.) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed the comprehensive person-centered care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of Resident R97's medical diagnoses in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on January 8, 2024, revealed a diagnosis for sleep apnea (a sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Review of Resident R97's MAR for January 2024, revealed a physician's order dated November 11, 2023, for continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate personal hygiene and grooming was maintained related to incontinence care and meal administration for one out of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R91) Findings include: Review of facility's 'Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Supporting,' revised March 2018, states Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care and c. Elimination, and d. Dining (meals and snacks). Review of facility provided grievance report dated October 9, 2023, revealed that on October 9, 2023 at 3:15pm, R91 was noted looking disheveled while in bed. Her daughter reported that half of a sandwich from lunch was found on her mom's bed covers. When the CNA from 3 to 11 shift provided incontinence care at 3:15 pm, dry bowel movement was found on R91.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policies, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents hazards for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R 83), who sustained frequent unwitnessed falls. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Fall Risk Assessment revised March 2018 states the nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. Review of residents R 83s clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of muscle weakness, abnormality of gait and mobility, and dementia (Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, by failing to ensure timely notification of the physician for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R20). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy revised 2008 revealed that any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the Dietitian in writing. Verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. The policy also states that the dietitian will respond within 24 hours of receipt of written notification. Review of resident R 20's clinical record revealed that Resident R20 was admitted to the facility November 28,2023 with diagnosis's of hemiplegia( a symptom that involves one sided paralysis effect either the right side or left side of the body) and hemiparesis(muscle weakness on one side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist conducted a medication regimen review at least monthly for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R62 and R3). Findings Include: Review of the undated facility policy Consultant Pharmacist and Reports revealed the consultant pharmacist will review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly and submit a written report of findings and recommendations resulting from the review. Interview on January 4, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, surveyor requested the last six months (July 2023 through December 2023) of monthly medication regimen reviews that were completed by the consultant pharmacist for Resident R62 and R3. Review of Resident R62's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of clinical record revealed no documented evidence the pharmacist completed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an as needed psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days, without a documented rationale for continued use for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised December 2016, revealed residents will not receive PRN (as needed) doses of psychotropic medications (can treat a persons mood, behavior, perception, and thoughts) unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. Further review of the policy revealed the need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale and duration for the extended order. Review of Resident R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated October 24, 2023, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia (caused by damage to or loss of nerve cells and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of review of clinical record, facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged incident of neglect to the State Agency as required for one of seven clinical records reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Falls- Clinical Protocol last revised March 2018, states 7. Falls should also be identified as witnessed or unwitnessed events. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Raynaud's syndrome without gangrene, presence of right artificial hip joint, muscle weakness, essential hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren syndrome, and osteoarthritis. Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated December 12, 2023 for Resident R1, the Cogntive Patterns section showed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 99 indicating severe cognitive impaitrment. Review of nursing progress note from November 30,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to notify a physician timely of a change in condition. (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Raynaud's syndrome (blood vessels in your fingers and toes temporarily overreact to low temperatures or stress) without gangrene, presence of right artificial hip joint, muscle weakness, essential hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren syndrome (a long term autoimmune disease that affects the body's moisture-producing glands) and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed a Brief Interview for Mental Staff (BIMS) dated December 12, 2023, revealed that the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-04-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVANGELICAL MANOR | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/1988 |
| DESTEFON, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| CONNER, RONNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/10/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $860K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395413. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.