Concordia at RP Home
2344 Perrysville Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15214 · Non profit - Corporation · 58 certified beds · (412) 321-4139 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.3% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.9% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.2% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 55.6% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.9%CMS range 29.0–62.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.1–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.6–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 54.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility provided documents and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect which resulted in actual harm of a hematoma to right forehead, patella (kneecap) fracture, and ankle sprain for one of three residents (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Prevention of Abuse and Response dated 7/15/25, indicated abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the admission record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and assistance for wheelchair transport to prevent accidents which resulted in actual harm of a hematoma to right forehead, patella (kneecap) fracture, and ankle sprain for one of three residents (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Fall Prevention dated 7/15/25, indicated a Fall Risk Assessment will be used to screen residents for fall risk on admission, quarterly, annually, and significant change. The nurse will complete the following:Review and complete the variables on the Morse Fall Scale by assigning the corresponding score which best describes the resident. Add the column of numbers to obtain the total score. Scoring as follows:-Hight Risk: 45 and higher-Moderate Risk: 25 - 44-Low Risk 0 - 24.Initiate an intervention(s) as appropriate. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for three of three residents reviewed (Resident CR1, R2, and R3).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 7/15/25, revealed ADL tasks include toileting and feeding. It is the facility policy to provide a resident the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. The nurse aides must document all ADL support and performance using the electronic health record. Proper position is maintained for eating and an elimination schedule is maintained for regularity. Clinical record review revealed Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of heart failure, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Review of physician orders dated 10/24/26, indicated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, and provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of three residents (CRR2).Findings include: Review of facility policy Wound Management Program, last reviewed 7/15/25, indicated the facility is committed to providing a comprehensive wound management program to promote the resident's highest level of functioning and well-being and to minimize the development of in-house acquired pressure injuries, unless the individuals' clinical condition demonstrates they are unavoidable. Any resident with a wound receives treatment and services consistent with the resident's goals of treatment. Typically, the goal is one of promoting healing and prevention of infection unless a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services (a special model of care for patients who are in the late phase of an incurable illness and wish to receive end-of-life care) with facility services to meet the needs for end of life care for one of two residents (Resident CRR2).Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CRR2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident CRR2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/30/25, indicated diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that may be caused by chronic disease and functional impairment). Section O- Special treatments, procedures and programs section K1 coded yes for hospice services while a resident. Review of Resident CRR2's physician order dated 9/13/24, indicated assessment and admitted to hospice. Further review of Resident CRR2's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility submitted documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident was free from neglect by not ensuring adequate supervision and assistance for transfers for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include:Review of facility policy Prevention of Abuse and Response dated 7/15/25, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs on an individual basis when a resident does not receive care in one or more areas (e.g., absence of frequent monitoring for a resident known to be incontinent, resulting in being left to lie in urine or feces). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (leaving an area without permission) for one of 55 residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention Guidelines last reviewed 7/15/25, indicated that the facility strives to promote resident safety and protect the rights and dignity of the residents. The facility maintains a process to assess all residents for risk of elopement; implement prevention strategies for those identified as elopement risk and follow a missing resident protocol. A situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision, if necessary, would be considered an elopement. Risk prevention includes:The nurse or designee will complete an elopement risk assessment for every resident upon admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor food temperatures and failed to properly maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition creating the potential for cross contamination in the main kitchen of the facility. Findings include: A review of facility policy Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 6/30/24, indicated that all local, state and federal standards and regulations will be followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition services department. A review of facility policy Food Temperatures, dated 6/30/24, indicated the temperatures of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. During an observation on 6/16/25, at 10:00 a.m., of the walk-in cooler in the main kitchen, conducted with the Director of Food Service (DFS) Employee E6, revealed that the shelving unit immediate left of cooler entrance and a sheet tray pan rack adjacent had a build-up of fuzzy grime and dark colored debris on their surfaces. DFS Employee E6 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain residents' confidential personal and medical records for one of five residents (Resident R7). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Notice of Privacy Practices, dated 7/18/20, last reviewed 1/7/25, stated the facility respects the privacy of residents protected health information and are committed to maintaining the resident's confidentiality. It extends to information received or created by our employees, staff, volunteers, and the Medical Director, or employed physicians. The facility is required by law to maintain the privacy of the residents protected health information. Review of the facility Resident Rights to Personal Privacy and Confidentiality dated 9/5/18, last reviewed 1/7/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure the resident's right it personal privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and clinical records. Staff will not post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, resident clinical records, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of neglect and provide necessary goods and services for one of four sampled residents (Resident R26). Findings include: The facility Prevention of abuse and response policy dated 2/28/25, indicated that abuse is the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. Neglect is the failure of the faciltiy, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services. Neglect occurs on an individual basis when a resident does not receive care. The Facility safety data sheet (a document indicating manufacturer guidelines to use for cleaners in addition to potential dangers involved chemicals) for germicidal bleach wipes (no date) indicated that first-aide measure are not necessary if direct contact with skin. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one out of two residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Resident R34). Finding include: Review of the facility policy Transfer or Discharge Documentation dated 8/1/24, indicated when a resident is transferred or discharged , the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information will be communicated to the receiving facility. A facility will provide and document preparation and orientation to each resident to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility. Information will be provided to the receiving provider regardless if the facility or resident initiated discharge. -Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident. -Resident representative information including contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of six residents (Resident R197). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Management dated 9/4/18, last reviewed 1/7/25, stated management of resident care is conducted systematically and comprehensively by a facility-wide (interdisciplinary) team. Resident care management sha;; be consistent with the medical plan of care. The physician orders shall be considered the part of the plan of care in addition to the formal care plan that is developed from the MDS process. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R197 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R197's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/23/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), muscle weakness, and Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one out of two residents (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of Resident R34's admission record indicated she was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis that included anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), adult failure to thrive, and malnutrition. Review of Residents R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/27/25, indicated the diagnoses were current. Section GG- Functional Abilities revealed the resident needed partial/moderate assistance with showering and bathing. Review of Resident R34's care plan dated 2/24/24, last revised 3/26/25, revealed the resident had a decline in the ability to perform dressing and hygiene tasks and is at risk for further decline. Interventions indicated to monitor ability to participate in ADL's and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed, and provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of five residents (Resident R147). Findings include: Review of facility policy Wound Management Program, dated 6/30/24, indicated facility is committed to providing a comprehensive wound management program to promote the resident's highest level of functioning and well-being and to minimize the development of in-house acquired pressure injuries, unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates they are unavoidable. Any resident with a wound receives treatment and services consistent with the resident's goals of treatment. Typically, the goal is one of promoting healing and prevention infection unless a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a colostomy as required for one of three residents (Resident R20). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a period assessment of care needs) dated 5/16/25, indicated diagnoses of intellectual disabilities, urinary incontinence, and colostomy status. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R20 had a physician's order dated 9/12/18, for colostomy care every shift. No directions specified for order. A further review failed to reveal an order to change the colostomy bag and wafer, including size. Review of Resident R20's care plan dated 9/14/18, last reviewed 4/10/25, indicated to assess stoma and surrounding tissue every shift for signs and symptoms of skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and maintain oxygen equipment for one of three sampled residents (Resident R17). Findings include: The facility Oxygen administration policy last reviewed on 6/30/24, indicated that each resident ordered oxygen will follow current best practices including maintenance of best practices for infection control. Review of Resident R17's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R17's MDS assessment (MDS: Minimum Data Set assessment-a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/9/25, indicated that she had diagnoses that included hypertension (a condition impacting blood circulation through the heart related to poor pressure), unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: a disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms involving breathlessness, coughing, and obstructed airflow to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident records, medication incident reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmaceutical services to ensure availability and administration of prescribed medications for one of three sampled resident records (Closed Resident Record CR145). Findings include: The facility Resident medication regimen review policy last reviewed 6/30/24, indicated that the pharmacist will perform a prospective review of medications ordered at the time of dispensing. Any problems that are identified are addressed immediately before the medication is dispensed. Medication and pharmacy support includes providing the facility an available supply of contingency and emergency medications for immediate resident needs. Review of Closed Resident Record CR145's admission record indicated she was admitted [DATE]. Review of Closed Resident Record CR145's MDS assessment (MDS: Minimum Data Set assessment-a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation of medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed at least monthly for two of three sampled resident records (Resident R4 and R20). Finding include: The facility Medication regimen review policy last reviewed 1/7/25, indicated that the drug regimen review of each resident is completed at least monthly by the consultant pharmacist and any irregularities are reported. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a period assessment of care needs) dated 5/25/25, indicated diagnoses of depression, chronic pain due to trauma, and dementia (a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills.) Review of Resident R4's care plan indicated that the resident requires use of psychotropic medication and is at risk for adverse side effects. Review of Resident R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications for one of four residents (Resident R34). Findings include: Review of Resident R34's admission record indicated she was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis that included anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), adult failure to thrive, and malnutrition. Review of Resident R34's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/27/25, indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R34's physician order dated 1/8/25, instructed to apply two grams of 1% Voltaren Gel to back and bilateral arms topically every shift for pain. During an observation on 6/16/25, at 11:23 a.m., a cup of gel substance was located on Resident R34's bedside dresser. Resident R34 indicated the gel substance in the medicine cup was Voltaren gel (topical pain reliever for arthritis joint pain).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Prevention of Abuse and Response dated 7/30/24, indicated Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs on an individual basis when a resident does not receive care in one or more areas. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility 8/14/24. Review of the clinical record MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) indicated diagnosis of dementia with other behavioral disturbances and cerebral infraction. Review of facility submitted documentation dated 2/9/25, indicated Resident R1 was observed by staff outside of the facility (unattended without staff) by an employee entrance. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, facility provided documents, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident safety and prevent an elopement (a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge) and failed to complete a thorough investigation after an incident for one of seven sampled residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Based on a review of facility policy titled Elopement prevention guidelines last reviewed 7/22/24, indicated that the facility strives to promote resident safety and protect the rights and dignity of residents. The facility maintains a process to assess all residents for risk for elopement; implement prevention strategies for those identified as elopement risk, and follow a missing resident procedure. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document notification of changes in one of three residents reviewed (Resident R36). Findings include: Review the clinical record revealed that Resident R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/11/24, , included diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (condition that happens when your blood sugar is too high), and hypertension (condition where your pressure in your blood vessels is consistently elevated). Review of Resident R36's clinical record indicated check fingerstick glucose before dinner on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday please report if glucose >200. Review of Resident R36's clinical record MAR (medication administration record for July 2024 and May 2024 showed the following dates with above >200 glucose: July 8th and 17th. May 1st, 17th, and 24th. Additional review of the clinical records failed to show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of five resident rooms (Resident R55). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights, last reviewed 7/22/24, indicated a resident has the right to a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. During an observation on 8/12/24 at 10:00 a.m. The wall area behind residents R55's headboard was noted to have pieces of drywall missing, large gouges, and denting. During an interview on 8/12/24, at 10:03 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E3 confirmed the observation and stated that the facility has started to put protective sheets behind the headboards. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (e)(1)(2) Management 28 Pa Code: 201.29 (a)(c)(d) Resident Rights
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans to meet care needs for two of four residents (Resident R9 and R15). Findings include: A review of facility policy Care Management reviewed 7/22/24, indicated the care plan will be developed consistent with each resident's rights and to meet the residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/25/24, indicates reentry to facility on 7/12/24, with the diagnosis of diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood) hypertension (high blood pressure) and Diabetes (high sugar in the blood) Review of physician orders 7/23/24, Indicates FreeStyle Libre 3 reader device (continuous glucose system receiver) check residents blood sugar before meals and at bedtime. Review of Resident R9's July 2024, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately monitor and provide comprehensive assessments of a pressure area for one of three resident (Resident R17). Findings include: The facility Wound management program dated 3/25/24, indicated that the facility is committed to providing a comprehensive wound management program to minimize the development of pressure injuries. A visual skin assessment is completed by the nurse. Results are documented in the skin observation tool. When the nurse observes a wound, he or she will assess the wound and document the findings. The following may be documented such as skin issues, type, length, width, depth, and wound stage. Review of Resident R17's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R17's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/26/24, indicated that she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of respiratory equipment for one of three residents(Resident R49). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Respiratory Equipment last reviewed on 7/22/24, indicates to prevent the administration of oxygen or medication through contaminated equipment. Nebulizer sets will be changed weekly or as needed. After treatments units will be rinsed with hot tap water and allowed to dry. Set will be stored in clean plastic bags between treatments. Nebulizer sets will be marked with Resident's name, the date and initials when changed. A review of the admission record indicated Resident R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of R49's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/6/24, included diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-makes it hard to breathe), and chronic kidney disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent and complete communication with the dialysis (treatment that helps body remove extra fluid and waste products) center for one of one resident receiving hemodialysis (Resident R15). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Dialysis Services dated 7/22/24, indicated to ensure that residents who require dialysis receives such service, consist with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences. Communication between the dialysis staff and nursing staff provide continuity of care will be ongoing via dialysis assessment binder. A review of Resident R15's MDS dated [DATE], indicated reentry date of 4/9/24, with the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure) end stage renal disease (last stage of kidney failure) and diabetes (high sugar in the blood) A review of Resident R15's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on manufacturer's instructions, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care for a resident with a Free Style Libre 3 system (a new way for people with diabetes to check their sugar levels, without a finger stick test, using a sensor that can read changes in the liquid just underneath the skin) for two of two residents (Resident R9 and R15) Findings include: Review of the FreeStyle Libre 3 continuous glucose monitoring system updated 5/2023, indicated the following: . What to know before using the system. . Who should not use the system. . What you should know about wearing a sensor. . How to store the sensor kit. . How to store the unit. . When not to use the system. . What to know about the system. . What to know before applying the sensor. . When is sensor glucose different from blood glucose. . What to know about x rays. . When to remove the sensor. . What to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for two of five nurse aide personnel records (Nurse aide Employee E8 and Nurse aide Employee E9). Findings include: The facility Certified nursing assistant position description last reviewed 7/22/24, indicated that the performance expectations are that the incumbent must be able to demonstrate the knowledge and skills necessary to provide care. Each employee is to be evaluated based on the standards set forth in the position description. Review of Nurse aide (NA) Employee E8's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 2/4/19. The record indicated that the position description and the employee handbook were both signed on 2/4/19. Review of Nurse aide (NA) Employee E8's performance evaluation for the evaluation period of 3/14/23 to 1/26/24, did not indicate a review with the employee and was observed without a review date. Review of Nurse aide (NA) Employee E9's personnel record indicated she was hired to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents receive appropriate treatment and services for highest practicable mental and psychosocial services for one of three residents (Resident R28). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 7/11/24, Behavioral Health Services, Trauma Informed Care indicated: It is the goal of the facility to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Review of Resident R28's indicated was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the MDS (minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 4/30/24, with the following diagnosis adjustment disorder with depression (mental condition triggered by a serious event). Review of Resident R28's clinical record indicated the following: 7/4/24: nurses notes : alerted by Resident R28's roommate that resident demonstrating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies and biologicals in one of one medication rooms (third floor medication room) and one of three medication carts (yellow medication cart), properly secure medications in one of three medication carts (green hall medication cart) and failed to date open medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Distribution System dated 7/22/24, indicate medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly. Orally administered medications are kept separate from medication administered by other routes. The facility's medication room is used to ensure an effective medication distribution by availability of a medication only refrigerator limiting access to only authorized personnel, kept clean, well-lit, and free of clutter. During an observation on 8/12/24, at 12:25 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 was completing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R17) and failed to implement infection control practices during administration of eye drops on one of three residents. (Resident R261) Findings include: A review of the facility policy Dressing Change, Clean Technique, last reviewed 7/22/24 indicates to prevent contamination of wounds such as pressure ulcers procedure includes but not limit to: . Remove the soiled dressing, place in trash bags. . Remove your gloves, wash your hands, and apply new gloves. . Clean the wound with normal saline solution or prescribed cleanser. . Use a dry 4x4 to pat the tissue surrounding the wound dry. . Remove your gloves, wash your hands, and apply new gloves. Review of the facility policy Medication Administration and Charting Guidelines, last reviewed 7/22/24, indicate ophthalmic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and service for pressure ulcers for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Wound Management Program, dated January 11, 2019, revealed The C.N.A. will observe resident's skin during care for signs and symptoms of skin breakdown and report concerns with skin integrity to nurse. Documenting findings in Point of Care Documentation. Review of Resident 1's diagnosis list revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). Review of Resident 1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Score Risk, dated February 15, 2024 revealed the resident to be at high risk for pressure ulcers. Review of Resident 1's Skin Observation tool dated February 16, 2024 revealed the resident was admitted with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full skin and tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of resident council minutes and interviews with residents and staff the facility failed to offer residents the opportunity to vote for five of thirteen residents. Findings include: Review of resident council minutes for seven months (February to September 2023) failed to include information of the facility asking residents to vote. During a resident group on 9/28/23, at 10:45 a.m. Residents indicated that they were not offered the opportunity to vote, in the May 2023 election. Five of thirteen residents indicated that they were interested in voting. During an interview on 9/29/23, at 2:07 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility could not provide documentation showing that the residents were asked prior to the May 2023 election if they wanted to vote and that the facility failed to offer residents the opportunity to vote. 28 Pa. Code 201.1(i)Resident rights.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for one of twelve residents reviewed (Resident R33). Findings include: Review of Resident R33 clinical record was re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33 MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 7/24/23, indicated that Resident R33 had diagnosis of congestive heart failure ( when your heart can't pump blood well enough to your body), and arthritis ( swelling and tenderness of one or more joints). Review of Resident R33 clinical record, listed care plans as cancelled, with no active care plans in place. Review of the MDS Section B0200. Hearing indicates Resident R33 has minimal difficulty hearing - difficulty in certain environments. Review of Resident R33 hospital record dated 4/13/23, indicated that resident has an impacted cerumen, right ear (causes symptoms such as hearing loss). During an interview on 9/27/23, at 10:17 a.m. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, job description review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice for one of four residents (Resident R100). Review of the facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description indicated that it is the responsibility of the LPN to provide care, based on physical, psycho/social, safety, and related criteria, appropriate to the residents served in his/her assigned area. It was indicated the LPN must maintain a current knowledge of federal, state, and other regulations applicable to job. Review of Resident R100's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic review of care needs) dated 9/20/23, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R100's diagnoses dated 9/20/23, indicated a diagnosis of low blood pressure, depression, and hypothyroidism (occurs when the thyroid gland can't make enough thyroid hormone to keep the body running normally). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide hearing assistive devices, treatment and services to one of two residents reviewed (Resident R33). Findings include: Federal regulations states: §483.25(a) Vision and hearing To ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities, the facility must, if necessary, assist the resident- Review of clinical record indicated Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33 MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 7/24/23, indicated that Resident R33 had diagnosis of congestive heart failure (when your heart can't pump blood well enough to your body), and arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints). Review of the MDS Section B0200. Hearing indicates Resident R33 has minimal difficulty hearing - difficulty in certain environments. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications with a medication error rate that was less than five percent for two of four residents (Resident R20). Findings include: Two medication errors occurred during 26 observed opportunities, which resulted in a 7.69% medication error rate. Review of Resident R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic review of care needs) dated 7/15/23, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], and diagnosis included depression, chronic pain, and schizophrenia (combination of mood disorder, depression and delusions). Review of Resident R20's physician order dated 7/11/23, instructed the nurse to give one tablet of Senna (stool softener to prevent constipation) one time a day for bowel regularity. During an observation of Resident R20's medication administration on 9/27/23, at 9:26 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E7 had Resident R20's morning medications signed off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and implement updated COVID-19 polices based on national standards and perform hand hygiene for one of four residents (Resident R49). Findings include: Review of the facility Hand Hygiene policy dated 6/9/20, last reviewed 6/23, indicated hand hygiene must be performed before and after resident contact and before and after performing any procedure. Review of the facility COVID-19, Coronavirus Prevention and Response dated 6/6/23, indicated residents are tested on admission Day 1, then if negative, test again 3 Day, then again on Day 5. It was indicated resident who become symptomatic will be tested. Review of the facility COVID-19 Contingency Staffing policy dated 6/6/23, indicated If staffing were to fall below the state required 2.7 hours of staffing per resident per day, the community would notify the Pennsylvania Department of Health, document the reason for inability to maintain 2.7 requirement. The facility policy failed to reflect the updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-29 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Form (SNF ABN CMS 10055) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident CR203) 48 hours before services ended. Findings include: Review of facility documentation showed Resident CR203 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and remained in the facility as of 4/27/23. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN CMS-10055) form which provides information to residents/resident representatives that skilled nursing services may not be paid by Medicare and so that the resident/resident representatives can decide if they wish to continue receiving skilled nursing services and assume financial responsibility indicated Resident CR203 last day of Medicare Part A coverage was 4/26/23. Review of the Resident CR203's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage dated 4/25/23, indicated the facility failed to issue the NOMNC within 48 hours. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MENEELY, LORRIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/10/2011 |
| TODHUNTER, CARA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/10/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395561. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.