John J Kane Regional Center-Gl

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 255 beds and averages 218.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility provided documents and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect which resulted in actual harm of a fracture of the right tibia (lower leg bone) for one of four residents (Resident R86). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse-Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 6/13/26, and previously reviewed 6/30/25, indicated the facility is to treat every resident with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property programs. This policy also provides direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and notifications obligations, and to conduct…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-05-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of professional standards of practice, facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the new development of pressure ulcers that resulted in hospitalization for the treatment of wounds. This resulted in actual harm for two of three residents with facility-acquired pressure ulcers. (Resident R15 and Resident R2).Findings include: Review of the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research &; Quality, the Pressure Ulcer Best Practice Bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed at alleviating the conditions contributing to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a safe environment resulting in a burn for one of thirteen residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse-Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 1/22/26, indicated every resident will be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality by preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Review of facility policy Accident Prevention dated 1/22/26, indicated the facility will prevent resident accidents and injuries to the extent possible by maintaining as much as possible, an environment free from accident hazards and by assuring residents receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. To safeguard all residents and employees, the facility reserves the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-07-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 12 of 12 months (June 2025 through July 2026). Findings include:During an interview on 7/6/26, at approximately 9:46 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E12 stated that he was the manager and was not certified.During an interview on 7/6/26, at 9:50 a.m., Registered Dietician Employee E13 stated that she works 4 days a week and is clinical only does not manage the dietary department.During an interview on 7/6/26, at approximately 9:50 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility currently does not have a Certified Dietary Manager failed to provide documented evidence that any staff met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director.Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.Pa Code: 211.6(c)(d) Dietary Services.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for cross-contamination or foodborne illness in the main kitchen (Main Kitchen). Findings include:During an observation of the kitchen on 7/6/26, from 9:32 a.m., through 9:46 a.m., the following was observed:The deep freezer had food stored under pipes to fans with ice buildup attached to boxes of food items and dripping into food items underneath. A ham loaf and two other meat packages were not sealed and exposed.The dry storage area had drawers of cereals that were unsealed and could allow for rodents.A can of foam cleanser was on a food prep table with food items. Next to this was a table with multiple rotten/black bananas.The toaster area had a pan of melted butter left uncovered and allowed for potential cross contamination.A cart had a bag of buns on the bottom touching the floor.Dietary Supervisor Employee E12 entered the kitchen with no hair restraint or beard guard.During an interview on 7/6/26, at approximately 9:45 a.m., Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in one of one outside dumpster to prevent the potential for rodent and insect infestation. Findings include:During an observation and interview of the facility's outdoor trash receptacle on 7/6/26, at approximately 9:46 a.m., with the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that there is no lid/cover for the facility dumpster, and it was overflowing with garbage and that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in the outside trash receptacle to prevent the potential for rodent and insect infestation.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for two of four residents (Resident R16 and R118). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Feeding Program, dated 6/13/26, with a previous review dare of 6/30/25, indicated that residents are fed in a therapeutic and dignified manner. During an observation on 7/6/26, at approximately 11:45 a.m., Resident R16 was seated at a table with two other residents, one resident was being assisted with her meal by Nurse Aide Employee E8 and the other fed herself. Resident R16 was not fed until the other resident was done at approximately 12:05 p.m. During an observation on 7/6/26, at approximately 11:45 a.m., Resident R118 had received his tray and staff continued to pass trays in dining room. Resident was at a table with another resident who fed himself. Resident R118 was not assisted with his meal until 12:05 p.m., after another resident at another table was finished being assisted by Registered Nurse Employee E9. During an interview on 7/6/26, at 12:05 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, review of facility provided documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to rule out the potential for abuse/neglect for one of four residents (Resident R197).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, Abuse-Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 6/13/26, and previously reviewed 6/30/25, indicated [NAME] Community Living Centers are to treat every resident with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property programs. This policy also provides direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and notifications obligations, and to conduct investigations. For purpose of this policy staff include facility employees,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose) and for change in physical assessment for three of 14 residents (Resident R 3, R11, R137).Findings include:The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a condom urinary catheter (a condom placed over the penis to drain urine) for one of four residents using catheters (Resident R197).Findings include: Review of the facility Catheters Care and Drainage dated 6/3/26, with a previous review date of 6/30/25, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide staff with instructions to safely and appropriately provide hygiene, monitor output and minimize the growth and transmission of pathogens for residents with urinary catheters. Nursing provides bathing/hygiene per resident care standards. Male residents' genitalia are cleansed, and foreskin is retracted and meatus is wiped rinsed pat dry and replaces foreskin. Staff are to document all care and services provided for residents.Review of the admission record indicated Resident R197 was admitted on [DATE], with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of three residents (Resident R239).Findings include: During an observation on 7/7/26, from 6:54 a.m., through 7:02 a.m., there was Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E10 and the 2A clerk on the nursing unit observed. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom call light was illuminating (Resident R239's room). During an observation on 7/7/26, at 7:03 a.m., Resident R239 had ambulated from the bathroom to bed by herself and stated she got tired of waiting for help. When LPN Employee E10 went to assist her as there were no other staff on the unit. Review of Resident R239's plan of care identified that she required assistance of two staff for ambulation and toileting. During a review of 11p-7a staff out punches identified: one NA punched out at 6:48one NA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility documents, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective call system for 15 of 17 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14).Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment last reviewed 2/9/26, indicated the facility is equipped with a nurse call system. During an observation on 5/16/26, at 10:02 a.m. of the shared restroom for Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4, revealed that the call light cord for was wrapped so tightly around the handrail it was unable to be alarmed. During an observation on 5/16/26, at 10:06 a.m. of the shared restroom for Residents R5, R6, and R7, revealed that the call light cord for was wrapped so tightly around the handrail it was unable to be alarmed. During an observation on 5/16/26, at 10:16 a.m. of the shared restroom for Residents R8, R9, R10, and R11, revealed that the call light cord for was wrapped so tightly around the handrail it was unable to be alarmed. During an observation on 5/16/26, at 10:19 a.m. of the shared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, documents, clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a resident was free from the use of physical restraints without a physical restraint order for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R2).Findings include:Review of facility policy, Abuse-Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime reviewed 1/7/25, indicated the resident is to be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program.Review of facility policy, Resident Rights and Responsibilities reviewed 1/7/25, indicated the facility is to treat each resident with dignity and respect. All activities and interactions to assist the resident in maintaining and enhancing self-esteem and self-worth by incorporating resident goals, preferences, and choices.Review of facility policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA