No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

John J Kane Regional Center-Ro

110 McIntyre Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15237 · Government - County · 240 certified beds · (412) 369-2020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$90,344 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $90,344 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-11)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
MyEyeDr.0.2 mi
22 McIntyre Square Dr · (412) 364-4700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy0.3 mi
8080 Mcintyre Square Drive
Grocery
8080 Mcintyre Square Drive
Park
1000 Ross Park Mall Dr · (412) 635-9991 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5910 Babcock Blvd · (412) 364-2442

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.6%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.2%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.2%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%68.7%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.271.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.661.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.8–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.85
RN hoursweekends
61.9%
Total nursing turnover
53.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 138.2 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 102 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-11)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

67 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and person-centered care plan interventions that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for two residents. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for two of 21 residents who were identified as at risk for elopement (Residents R6, and R111). Findings include: Review of the policy Accident Prevention dated 1/2/25, indicated the facility policy is to prevent resident accidents and injuries to the extent possible by maintaining, as much as possible, an environment free from accident hazards and by assuring residents receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. Review of the policy Wanderguard and Elopement dated 1/2/25, indicated the facility implements safety measures for residents who wander and/or are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate goods and services to prevent falls, resulting in neglect for one of two residents (Resident R2), which resulted in actual harm of a hematoma (a localized collection of blood outside the blood vessels, typically caused by blood vessel damage from trauma or injury) on residents left side of forehead, a laceration (cut) above the left eye, and a hematoma to right knee with pain for Resident R2. Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that facility will treat every resident with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Definition of neglect is defined by the failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate equipment to prevent an accident for one of two residents (Resident R1), which resulted in actual harm of bruising and a fracture of residents right foot for Resident R1, and failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance for one of two residents (Resident R2), which resulted in actual harm of a hematoma (localized collection of blood outside the blood vessels, typically caused by blood vessel damage from trauma or injury) on residents left side of forehead, a laceration (cut) above the left eye, and a hematoma to right knee with pain for Resident R2. Findings include: Review of facility policy Accident Prevention dated 1/2/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to prevent resident accidents and injuries to the extent possible by maintaining an environment free from accident hazards and by assuring residents receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three residents (Resident R52) who had two choking episodes, which resulted in actual harm during the second choking episode that required the Heimlich maneuver (abdominal thrusts that elevate the diaphragm and increase airway pressure, forcing air from the lungs; used to expel a foreign body from the airway). Findings include: Review of facility policy Accident Prevention dated 1/3/24, indicated the interdisciplinary team (IDT) is to assess, observe, and identify environmental and resident risks/hazards. The IDT implements or revise person centered interventions to decrease the potential for accidents by evaluating previous accidents and incidents. The IDT monitors and evaluates effectiveness of interventions and modifies as needed. The IDT provides or revises training and competency as needed, identifies what triggered or contributed to the accident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, facility documents, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse for one of three sampled resident records (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility provided policy titled Abuse- Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 5/28/26, indicated that the facility will treat every resident with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. Verbal abuse is identified as any use of oral, written or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms to the resident or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Alleged violations, whether or not confirmed, must be reported to the Administrator, Departement of health, the Area Agency on Aging, Compliance Officer, and to the Executive Director, and a full investigation conducted. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect due to lack of supervision resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident CR1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that the facility is to treat every residents with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Purpose to provide direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and notification obligations, and to conduct investigations.Definitions:Neglect - the failure of the facility, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation with a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident CR1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that the facility is to treat every residents with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Purpose to provide direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report an incident of neglect for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident CR1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that the facility is to treat every residents with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Purpose to provide direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and notification obligations, and to conduct investigations.Definitions:Neglect - the failure of the facility, the staff, or service provider to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation for incident of elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents reviewed (Closed Record CR1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that the facility is to treat every residents with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. This policy is part of the centers overall prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property program. Purpose to provide direction to staff regarding procedures required to protect residents from abuse, to respond appropriately to allegations, to satisfy reporting and notification obligations, and to conduct investigations.Definitions:Neglect - the failure of the facility, the staff, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident CR1).Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions:Review the resident's medical record (e.g., physician orders, nurses' notes, nursing assistant documentation) to determine if alarms were used during the 7-day look-back period.After determining whether or not an item was used during the 7-day look-back period, code the frequency of use: Code 0, not used: if the device was not used during the 7-day look-back period. Code 1, used less than daily: if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to make certain a resident had an updated, person-centered care plan individualized to each specific resident's needs after an incident of elopement for one of three residents (Closed Record Resident CR1).Finding include: Review of facility policy Wanderguard and Elopement Policy, dated 1/2/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to implement safety measures for resident who wander and/or are at risk for elopement to attempt to prevent elopement.Definitions:Wandering - random or repetitive locomotion. This may be movement may be goal-directed or may be non-goal-directed or aimless. Non-goal-directed wandering requires a response in a manner that addresses both safety issues and an evaluation to identify root causes to the degree possible.Elopement - when a resident leaves the premises or safe area without the facilities knowledge and supervision. Review of facility policy Assessment - MDS/RAI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of four residents (Closed Record Resident CR1). This was identified as past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of facility policy Wanderguard and Elopement Policy, dated 1/2/26, indicated it is the policy of the facility to implement safety measures for resident who wander and/or are at risk for elopement to attempt to prevent elopement.Definitions:Wandering - random or repetitive locomotion. This may be movement may be goal-directed or may be non-goal-directed or aimless. Non-goal-directed wandering requires a response in a manner that addresses both safety issues and an evaluation to identify root causes to the degree possible.Elopement - when a resident leaves the premises or safe area without the facilities knowledge and supervision. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documentation, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, dated 1/2/25, indicated that facility will treat every resident with consideration, respect, and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. Definition of neglect is defined by the failure of the facility, the staff, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy Catheter Care and Drainage Bags last reviewed 1/2/25, indicated to provide nursing staff with instructions to safely and appropriately provide hygiene for residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Review of the facility job description for Nursing Assistant (NA), indicated that staff will provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan to accurately reflect the current status for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings included:Review of the facility Assessment -Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning last reviewed 1/2/25, indicated to assure documentation, development, and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for all residents to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 10/13/25, indicated the diagnosis of traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, anemia (low iron in the blood) and neurogenic bladder. Review of Resident R1's physician orders dated 12/10/25, indicated right anterior lower extremity trauma wound, leave open to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit a readmission to the facility after hospitalization and failed to demonstrate in the clinical record that the discharge was appropriate and necessary for one of three sampled closed resident records (Closed Resident Record CR1).Findings include: The facility Discharge and transfer policy dated 4/28/25, indicated that discharge criteria included to discharge as necessary to meet the resident's welfare and when the resident's welfare and physical needs cannot be met in the facility. The Facility assessment last updated 6/30/25, indicted that common diagnoses that residents in facility have are depression, impaired cognition and behaviors that need intervention. The assessment further indicated that staff are trained on specific areas that relate to psychiatric symptoms, provide interventions dealing with depression and anxiety. Review of Closed Resident Record CR1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly store, label. and date food and failed to monitor expiration dates of food products in the Main Kitchen which created the potential for food borne illness. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Storing: Food and Equipment last reviewed 1/2/25, indicated that team members must store food in a manner that ensures quality, freshness, and safeguards against foodborne illness. All team members must follow food and temperature guidelines, labeling, use-by-dates, food storage chart, freezing, and leftover guidelines to ensure food and equipment criteria are met. Label food with name of product, date by which product should be used, and date thawed or frozen if applicable. Food should be discarded or used by the use-by-date. During an observation in the Main Kitchen Walk-in Cooler number one, on 4/7/25, at 9:35 a.m. the following was noted: · An opened bag of French fries, was not sealed, labeled, or dated. · A plastic bag containing bologna was marked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that necessary care and services were provided to residents requiring adequate supervision to prevent elopement. Findings include: Review of CFR §483.70 Administration. A facility must be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Based on the findings in this report that identified the facility failed to maintain necessary supervision and person-centered care plan interventions that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for two residents. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for two of 21 residents who were identified as at risk for elopement (Residents R6, and R111). Facility failed to provide fundamental principal that applies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet care needs for four of four residents (Residents R7, R42, R66, and R219). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning last reviewed on 1/2/25, indicated that the facility will comply with requirements related to comprehensive person-centered care planning. The services provided to or arrange for residents will meet professional standards of quality, are provided by qualified persons, and are culturally-competent and trauma-informed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/2/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and muscle weakness. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for three of four residents (Residents R35, R91, and R368). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Feeding: Feeding Tubes, dated 1/2/25, indicated that feeding and flush bags are labeled with the resident's name, date, time, and direction. The nurse confirms placement - G tubes - aspirate gastric contents using a 60 cc (cubic centimeter) piston syringe. Review of the facility policy Medication Administration through Gastrostomy Tube dated 1/2/25, indicated nurse pinches off the G tube by kinking and attaches the barrel of the piston syringe to tube. Checks for placement of the tube by following facility policy. Pours 30 milliliters of water into the syringe barrel to flush tube. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of seven residents (Residents R5, R102, and R368). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Guidelines dated 1/2/25, indicated oxygen is a medication and must be ordered by a practitioner. Set-ups (cannulas, face masks, respiratory delivery, humidification bottles) should be changed every 7 days and are labeled with date of change initialed by staff. Set-ups are stored in plastic bag when not in use to avoid contamination. Replace if contamination occurs. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/27/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and muscle weakness. Review of a physician order dated 2/26/25, indicated to administer O2 (oxygen) at 2L via NC (two liters per minute via nasal cannula - a lightweight tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for two of four crash carts and three of six Automated External Defibrillators (AED - a portable, electronic device designed to diagnose and treat life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias). Findings include: Review of facility policy Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator: Basic Life Support dated [DATE], indicated the response team leader assures that staff members perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-an emergency treatment that is done when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) and utilizes the AED appropriately. The Material Manager Security assures that there is an adequate supply of disposable electrodes available. During an observation of the 2 East crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) on [DATE], at 11:33 a.m. revealed a binder on the crash cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one of three units observed (Three East) and failed to protect and value residents' private space for one of three units observed (Three East). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights and Responsibilities dated 1/2/25, indicated that each resident have the right to be treated with dignity and respect. During a dining observation of the Three East dining room on 4/7/25, at 11:54 a.m. revealed that Resident R21 was being assisted with lunch by a staff member. Nurse Assistant (NA) Employee E7 was standing beside Resident R21 while feeding him his lunch. During an interview on 4/7/25, at 12:07 p.m. NA Employee E7 stated, I know we are supposed to sit down. During an interview on 4/7/25, at 3:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident R21. During an observation on Three East Unit on 4/7/25, at 12:11 p.m. Housekeeping Employee E26 was seen entering Resident R92's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of three resident areas (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights and Responsibilities dated 1/2/25, indicated Resident Rights are posted on each floor. Review of The Resident's [NAME] of Rights, indicated the resident has the right to a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to ensuring that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and is sanitary, orderly and comfortable. Observation on 4/7/25, 11:22 a.m. of unoccupied Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a large maintenance cart in the room. There were no beds or furniture in the room. Cart noted with handheld drills, scraping tools, caulk gun supplies, screws, wires and other maintenance tools. The lights above where the beds should be removed on both sides and wires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for two of four residents reviewed (Residents R35 and R68). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 1/2/25, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, the staff, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/17/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). MDS Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels per physician orders and failed to implement the facility's hypoglycemia protocol for two of four residents (Residents R65 and R66). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hypoglycemia Protocol dated 1/2/25, indicated a CBG reading of less than 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and symptomatic or a CBG of less than 60 mg/dL regardless of symptoms, hold all diabetic mediations and insulin until reviewed with physician, provide treatment, recheck CBG in 15 minutes, treat according to protocol, and notify physician. May repeat such administrations of this medication up to 2 times within 30 minutes time period in the event of an acute hypoglycemic episode. The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two of five residents (Residents R61 and R98). Findings include: Review of facility policy Contracture Management dated 1/2/25, indicated residents with limited ROM (range of motion) will receive appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in ROM. The nurse develops and coordinates an interdisciplinary person-centered plan of care that includes passive and/or active ROM exercises, splints, braces or other devices where applicable that will improve or maintain current ROM except where clinically contraindicated. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R61's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/27/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in one of three medication carts (Three East Med Cart), and one of three medication rooms (Three [NAME] medication room). Findings: Review of facility Medication Administration General Guidelines policy dated [DATE], indicated that facility will safely administer medications to residents as prescribed by the practitioner and in accordance with current standards of practice and regulatory requirements. The purpose is to provide direction to the licensed staff in the safe and effective administration of medication, including the storing and handling of medication. Check manufactures or pharmacy expiration dates, documentation of date open. During a medication cart review on [DATE], at 11:37 a.m. the following were observed: - Insulin Glargine Pen (used to treat diabetes - a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and complete accurate, and appropriate documentation for two of eight residents (Resident R20, and R41). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.709(i) Medical records. In accordance with accepted professional standards and practice, the facility must maintain medical records that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 2/23/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, cerebrovascular accident (when blood flow to the brain is disrupted), and muscle weakness. Review of Facility Wound Summary Report provided on 4/7/25, Indicated that Resident R20 had a Stage three pressure injury (an ulcer that has burrowed past the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for one of four residents (Residents R91). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Precautions: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 1/2/25, indicated EBP is an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. Residents with EBP are indicated, use with the following high-contact resident care activities: Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, and tracheostomy/ventilator care. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R91 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R91's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/14/25, indicated the diagnoses of stroke (damage to the brain from an interruption of blood supply), difficulty swallowing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for two of eight staff members (Employee E12, and E13). Findings include: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that all personnel, including manager, staff (both employees and those who provide services under contract), and volunteers, as well as their education and/or training and any competencies related to resident care. During an interview on 4/9/25, at 1:19 p.m. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Employee E14 stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December. Review of facility education documents for the year 2024 revealed the following concerns: Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E12's facility provided information did not include training on QAPI education. Review of RN Employee E13's facility provided information did not include training on QAPI education. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly reheat food items in the unit pantries creating the potential for cross contamination and food-borne illness for two of three units (2 East Pantry and 3 East Pantry). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Reheating Food last reviewed on 1/2/25, indicates to assure residents receives food at a temperature that is safe and comfortable for the resident. To provide guidelines to staff to reheat food items when residents/resident representative requests food be warmed. 1. Retrieves thermometer in locked panty cupboard from nurse. 2. Cleans thermometer with alcohol prior to use. 3. Places food item to be warmed into microwave and sets at 30-second increments. 4. Removes food items and stirs 5. Places thermometer into center of food item until it stops registering. Safe food temperature is 140 degrees or less. a. Continues this process until food is at safe temperature. 6. Clean thermometer and returns to nurse for storage. Review of grievance log dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting of controlled medications and ensure medication cart keys were provided to staff in accordance with professional standards during a shift to shift change on one out of six medication carts (3-West low hall ). Findings include: The facility Medications-narcotics, controlled substances policy last reviewed on 1/2/25, indicated that the medication key exchange included conducting a physical inventory of medications in the locked medication drawer every time medication keys are exchanged, the departing nurse reviewing the inventory form, the receiving nurse visualizing each medication in the drawer, the receiving nurse checking the narcotic disposition record, and both nurses signing the appropriate form. The facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description last reviewed on 1/2/25, indicated that the LPN will ensure that medication and narcotics are completed accurately in accordance with established policies.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications securely in one out of six medications carts (3-West Low hall medication cart). Findings include: The facility Medication administration general guidelines policy last reviewed 1/2/25, indicated that all medications must be kept secured and in a locked environment. During observations on 2/3/25, at 12:13 p.m. observations of the 3-West unit found the 3-West low hall medication cart was observed unlocked. No registered nurse, licensed practical nurse or any other staff observed securing the cart. During observations on 2/3/25, at 12:17 p.m. observations of the 3-West unit found the 3-West low hall medication cart #1 observed unlocked. No registered nurse, licensed practical nurse or any other staff observed securing the cart. During an interview on 2/3/25, at 12:18 p.m. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) Employee E1 confirmed that the facility failed to store medications securely in one out of six medications carts as required. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control monitoring policies for Respiratory Precautions for one of three residents (Resident R1), failed to prevent cross contamination by having dirty linens on the floor for one of eight residents (Resident R1), failed to maintain sanitary commodes in bathrooms for three of eight residents (Residents R2, R3, and R5), and failed to ensure floor mats were clean for four of eight residents (Residents R4, R6, R7, and R8). Findings include: Review of the CDC (Center for Disease Control) Fact Sheet Use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) When Caring for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Covid-19 indicated doffing - (taking off the gear) Remove gloves and gown. Healthcare Personnel may now exit patient room. Next, remove face shield or goggles and remove and discard respirator. Perform hand hygiene after removing the respirator and applying a new one. Review of the facility policy Cleaning and Preventative Maintenance, Resident Rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow a care plan and failed to develop a care plan for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy All Policy and Procedures : General Guidelines dated 1/3/24, indicated Staff must document all care and services provided to the resident. Documentation should - d. Include identification, evaluation, intervention, and attempts to made to implement and revise the plan of care to address the changing needs of the resident. Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1 clinical record MDS ( minimum data set - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 10/23/24, indicated diagnosis of unspecified dementia ( a general term for memory, language, problem -solving, and other thinking abilities that are sever enough to interfere with daily living) hypertension ( is when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician order, with missed medication, resulting in a hospitalization for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy All Policy and Procedure: General Guideline dated 1/3/24, indicated Provide the necessary care and services to each resident to attain or maintain his or her practicable, physical mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with their comprehensive person centered care plan that is culturally -competent and trauma informed. Abide by rules and regulations and standards of practice. Ensure that resident obtains optimal improvement or does not deteriorate within the limits of a residents right to refuse treatment, goals of care, and within the limits of recognized pathology and the normal aging process. Review of facility policy Medication Administration General Guidelines dated 1/3/24, indicated It is the policy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food in an appropriate consistency to meet the resident's needs for one of seven residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/24/24, indicated diagnoses of muscle weakness, hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) . Physician orders for Resident R1, dated 11/8/23, included an order for the resident to receive a pureed diet with thin liquids. Review of reports submitted to the local state field office dated 10/13/24, at 8:45 a.m. revealed Resident R1 had an episode of coughing requiring suctioning after she ate a regular diet instead of pureed diet as ordered. A nurse's note for Resident R1, dated 10/13/24 at 8:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly date and store food products in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the Main Kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Storage dated 1/3/24, indicated foods products are labeled and dated with the receiving date. Never store chemicals with food and paper supplies. During an observation and interview in walk-in cooler number two in the Main Kitchen on 6/24/24, at 9:44 a.m. an opened gallon of iced tea, and an opened half- gallon container of lemonade had no date, and a plastic container of peaches, had no label or date. Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E18 confirmed that the facility failed to properly label and date opened food packages to prevent foodborne illness. During an observation and interview on 6/25/24, at 1:40 p.m. an opened bottled of iced tea was found in the chemical room in the Main Kitchen amongst the chemicals. FSD Employee E18 confirmed that the facility failed to properly segregate food and chemicals. 28 Pa. Code:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for four out of four residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R2, R41, R81, and R118). Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer of Resident to Acute Facility dated 1/3/24, indicated the nurse documents in the electronic medical record notification of practitioner, notification of resident representative, and preparation of resident. The nurse sends the following information to the receiving facility: contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, contact information for the resident representative, advance directive, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, comprehensive care plan goals, all other necessary information including but not limited to residents' overall status, discharge summary,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for three of four residents (Resident R2, R41, and R81). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.15(c)(5) Contents of the notice. The written notice specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section must include the following: (i) The reason for transfer or discharge; (ii) The effective date of transfer or discharge; (iii) The location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; (iv) A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; (v) The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for four of four resident hospital transfers (Resident R2, R41, R81, and R118). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Bed Hold Notice and Procedures dated 1/3/24, indicated written notice of the bed hold policy will be provided to the resident or legal representative upon admission, upon hospital transfer, or at day two or three when resident is admitted to the hospital, and upon therapeutic leave of absences lasting over 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/21/24, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident and a resident's representative was provided a summary of their completed baseline care plan for three of six residents (Resident R41, R71, and R82). Findings include: Review of Resident R41's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/9/24, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries), and depression. Review of Resident R41's clinical record failed to produce documentation that a resident and resident representative was provided with a summary of the baseline care plan. Review of Resident R71's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R71's MDS dated [DATE], indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for three of three residents (Resident R83, R88, and R99). Findings include: Review of facility policy Behavior Management and Trauma Informed Care dated 1/3/24, indicated that the facility provides behavioral health care services, according to comprehensive assessment and person-centered plan of care to residents who are diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). The Interdisciplinary Team will identify and address through resident/resident representative interview, triggers that can lead to expressions or indicators of distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a diagnosis for hospice services for four of four residents (Residents R70, R71, R81, and R98) and failed to have a completed hospice communication binder for one of four residents (Resident R71). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hospice Services dated 1/3/24, indicated any level of care above routine requires approval and authorization from the attending physician that he or she concurs that the resident's condition warrants a greater level of care. The attending physician writes an order for hospice services when resident/family agrees to hospice services and is eligible for the service. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 70's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/14/24, indicated diagnoses of stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for neglect for one of three residents (Resident R52) involving a choking incident. Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 1/3/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, the staff, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect may be the result of a pattern of failures or may be the result of one or more failures involving one resident and one staff person. The House Supervisor or Administrator/Designee interviews and obtains written statements from complaining party and witnesses using a facility form. Review of the clinical record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a choking incident to rule out neglect for one of three residents (Resident R52). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse - Resident and Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime dated 1/3/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, the staff, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect may be the result of a pattern of failures or may be the result of one or more failures involving one resident and one staff person. The House Supervisor or Administrator/Designee interviews and obtains written statements from complaining party and witnesses using a facility form. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R52's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess a resident for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose) for one of three residents (Resident R73), and failed to obtain physician orders for one of ten residents (Resident R369). Findings include: Review of facility Emergency Care Guidelines: Hypoglycemia Protocol dated 1/3/24, indicated a CBG reading of less than 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and symptomatic or a CBG of less than 60 mg/dL regardless of symptoms, hold all diabetic mediations and insulin until reviewed with physician, provide treatment, recheck CBG in 15 minutes, treat according to protocol, and notify physician. May repeat such administrations of this medication up to 2 times within 30 minutes time period in the event of an acute hypoglycemic episode. The Centers for Disease Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for two of four residents (Resident R2 and R82). Findings include: Review of facility Catheter, Urinary -Bladder Irrigation: Continuous and Intermittent policy dated 1/3/24, indicated to safely provide care and treatment for bladder infections, inflammation, spasms and irritation as prescribed by the practitioner. Open solutions are discarded after twenty-four hours. Review of facility Catheter care and Drainage Bag policy dated 1/3/24, indicated to promote hygiene, monitor urinary output and minimize the growth and transmission of pathogens for residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Drainage bags are to be covered by a dignity bag. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's MDS (Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R41). Findings include: Review of facility policy Colostomy and Ileostomy Care dated 1/3/24, indicated residents who require special services like ostomy (a stoma is surgically created opening from an area inside the body to the outside) care receive such care consistent with professional standards of practice. Staff to notify practitioner when there are changes to the stoma or skin. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/29/24, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two of four residents (Residents R1 and R65) and failed to track active infections for one out of three residents (R369). Findings include: Review of facility policy Precautions: Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 1/3/24, indicated Enhanced Barrier Precautions are established for residents during high-contact care activities for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices. EBP is an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care. Indwelling medical devices include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomies. High-contact resident care activities include dressing, bathing/showering, transferring when anticipating close physical contact for long duration of time, providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, security footage, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one out of four sampled residents (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Finding include: The facility Elopement: missing resident policy dated 12/30/21, indicated that it is the policy of the facility to provide each resident with receive adequate monitoring and interventions to maintain safety. When a resident is unaccounted for all staff will report any suspected unplanned resident absence to the Supervisor or charge nurse. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/19/24, indicated that Resident R1 had diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided for six of six residents with an indwelling urinary catheter (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy Catheter Care and Drainage Bags dated 1/3/24, indicated the facility will safely and appropriately provide hygiene, monitor urinary output, and minimize the growth and transmission of pathogens for residents with indwelling urinary catheters (tube in bladder to drain urine), and the drainage bags are to be covered with a dignity bag. Review of the Centers for Disease Control guidance Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections updated 6/6/19, indicated to keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Review of facility policy Catheter Urinary: Removal dated 1/3/24, indicated physician orders discontinuation of catheter and any follow up treatments when condition is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in prescribed medication for Resident R1. Findings include: Review of facility policy Notification of Change in Residents Condition and Treatment Changes, last reviewed 1/3/24, indicate it is the policy of the [NAME] J. [NAME] Regional Centers to fully inform residents or responsible parties when applicable, in language that he or she can understand of his or hers health status including significant changes in condition or treatment. Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicate an admission date of 6/29/23, with the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the body), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficult swallowing). Review of Resident R1's medication administration record (MAR) indicate orders 2/19/24 -2/21/24, azithromycin 500 milligram tablet, 1 tablet hour of sleep for 3 days diagnosis cough, pneumonia. MAR indicates resident received.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record, investigation documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect within 24-hours for one of six sampled residents (Resident R1). Findings include: The facility Abuse-Resident and reasonable suspicion of a crime dated 2/7/23, last reviewed 1/3/24, indicated that neglect is the failure of the facility, staff or service providers, to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Alleged violations, whether or not confirmed, must be reported to the Administrator, Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Area Agency on Aging, Compliance Officer, and to the Executive Director. Timing of the report involving no serious bodily injury shall be reported no later than 24-hours. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE], and Resident R1'S diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 1/4/23 indicated that medications will be safely administered as prescribed by the practitioner and in accordance with current standards of practice and regulatory requirements. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side), and high blood pressure. A review of the Minimum Data Set - Resident Assessment and Care Screening (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the diagnoses remained current and the resident is alert with periods of confusion. A review of a physician order dated 12/6/23, indicated to give Hydralazine (medication that lowers blood pressure) 10 mg (milligrams) one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one of eight residents (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Medication Administration General Guidelines dated 1/4/23, indicated to administer medications as prescribed by the practitioner and in accordance with current standards of practice and regulatory requirements. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, and insomnia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/20/23, indicated the diagnoses remain current and the resident is alert and oriented with periods of confusion, and able to make needs known. A review of a physician order dated 10/13/23, indicated to give Temazepam (a controlled substance sedative to treat insomnia) 15 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, resident fund account statements and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper accounting of resident funds and prevent commingling of funds for four out of six closed resident records (Closed Resident Records CR125, CR127, CR128, and Closed Resident Record CR173). Findings include: The facility Resident funds authorization form last reviewed 1/4/23, indicated that upon death of a resident, the facility will follow regulatory guidelines with respect to closing out of the resident fund account. Closed Resident Record CR125's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Closed Resident Record CR125's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/26/22, indicated she had diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by memory loss and progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning), chronic kidney disease(a loss of kidney function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, resident fund account statements and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident funds and closed accounts upon discharge or death in a timely manner for four out of eight closed resident records (Closed Resident Records CR125, CR127, CR128, and Closed Resident Record CR173). Findings include: The facility Personal Property policy dated [DATE], indicated to review the accounts of the deceased or discharged and pay the amounts of the difference between any payment made within 30 days. The facility Resident funds authorization form last reviewed [DATE], indicated that upon death of a resident, the facility will follow regulatory guidelines with respect to closing out of the resident fund account. Closed Resident Record CR125's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE]. Closed Resident Record CR125's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure sore development for three of eight residents (Resident R19, R29 and R1), and promote healing, and prevent worsening of pressure injuries. The facility failed to promote healing and provide treatment according to the physician orders for one of eight residents (Resident R70). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Wound Care-Pressure Ulcer/Injury Prevention, last reviewed on [DATE], with a previous review date of [DATE], indicated that the facility is to ensure resident ' s receive care to prevent pressure ulcers/injuries, residents do not develop pressure ulcers unless the clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable and resident ' s with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the financial and clinical records, staff and resident interview, it was revealed that the facility failed afford a resident and/or their legal representative the right to manage his own financial affairs for one of six sampled residents (Resident R70). Findings include: The facility Resident rights and responsibilities policy last reviewed on 7/1/23, indicated that the purpose of the guideline is for staff to respect resident's individuality and value the resident's input . All activities and interactions assist the resident in maintaining and enhancing self-esteem and self-worth. Review of Resident R70's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE], and Resident R70 diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (muscle and nerve concerns impacting bladder control), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD- a narrowing of the blood vessels in the legs). Review of Resident R70's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, Emergency Department notes and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet care needs for one of two residents (Resident R111) related to PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning last reviewed on 1/4/23, with a previous review date of 1/3/22, indicated that the facility will comply with requirements related to comprehensive person-centered care planning. The services provided to or arrange for residents will meet professional standards of quality and will be provided by qualified persons and are trauma-informed. Practitioner's orders, progress notes which include treatment plans will be part of the whole resident comprehensive person-centered care plan. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan when the facility failed to notify the physician of a pacemaker device malfunction allowing for the potential for one of two residents (Resident R84) to have had a cardiac event with not providing monitoring of her heart rate via the pacemaker device or physical assessment during the pacemaker monitoring device malfunction time of three days (3/3/23 through 3/6/23). Findings included: Review of the facility policy Pacemaker/Defibrillator last reviewed on 1/4/23, with previous review date of 1/3/22, indicated that the facility will follow the cardiologist and manufacturers recommendations and the Safe Medical Device Act and obtain detailed information about each device, report any malfunctions of the devices and assure the device is checked.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prove appropriate respiratory care for one of five residents (Residents R101). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Oxygen Guidelines dated 1/4/23, and previously dated 1/3/22, indicated that the cannulas, face masks, and humidification bottles should be changed at least every seven days and are labeled with date of change initialed by staff. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/18/23, indicated diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries). Review of physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete timely annual resident rights, communication and infection control competencies for two out of five nurse aide personnel records (Nurse aide Employee E1 and Nurse aide Employee E2). Findings include: The facility Nursing Assistant job description dated 1/29/07, and last reviewed 1/4/23, indicated that the nurse aide provides each assigned resident with routine individualized nursing care in accordance with current applicable Federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that staff competencies are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. Annual mandatory education consist of test to determine competency. Education is formal and informal and includes resident rights, abuse, infection control, dementia, psychosocial needs and customer service. Review of Nurse aide Employee E1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluation based on date of hire for one out of five nurse aide personnel records (Nurse Aide Employee E3). Findings include: The facility Nursing Assistant job description dated 1/29/07, and last reviewed 1/4/23, indicated that the nurse aide provides each assigned resident with routine individualized nursing care in accordance with current applicable Federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that staff competencies are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. Annual evaluations identify opportunities for staff development. Review of Nurse aide Employee E3's personnel record indicated she was hired on 4/4/16. Review of Nurse aide Employee E3's personnel record did not include an annual performance evaluation. During an interview on 7/27/23, at 10:53 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer directions, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential for cross contamination due to not cleaning the of two hydrocollator units for use on residents requiring moist heat for treatment. Findings include: During an observation on 7/28/23, at 10:17 a.m., of the two hydrocollator units of the therapy department, documentation did not include that the staff emptied cleaned and changed the water of the two hydrocollator's to prevent the potential for cross contamination. During an interview on 7/28/23, at 10:17 a.m., Physical Therapy Aide Employee E14 confirmed that the facility failed to follow the manufacture's directions for cleaning and refilling the two hydrocollator units of the therapy department and implement measures to prevent the potential cross contamination. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility. 28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual training on dementia management for two out of five nurse aide personnel files (Nurse aide Employee E1 and Nurse Aide Employee E2). Findings include: The facility Nursing Assistant job description dated 1/29/07, and last reviewed 1/4/23, indicated that the nurse aide provides each assigned resident with routine individualized nursing care in accordance with current applicable Federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations. The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that staff competencies are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. Annual mandatory education consist of test to determine competency. Education is formal and informal and includes resident rights, abuse, infection control, dementia, psychosocial needs and customer service. Review of Nurse aide Employee E1's personnel record indicated she was hired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$90,344 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $64,360 — penalty dated 2025-04-11
  • $25,984 — penalty dated 2024-06-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-24 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BIONDO, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/25/2004
MCKAIN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2012
MULROY, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2011
POLINAK, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-56.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 1%Other / private 14%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$519per resident / day
operating cost
$15,771per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395606. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next