No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Southwestern Veterans Center

7060 Highland Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15206 · Government - State · 236 certified beds · (412) 665-6706 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$245,564 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $245,564 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-28)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7157 Mary Peck Bond Pl · (412) 661-2802 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
910 Freeport Rd · (412) 781-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1701 Lincoln Ave · (412) 824-3221 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lake Dr · (412) 742-3413 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%68.7%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.031.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.991.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.08
RN hoursweekends
45.8%
Total nursing turnover
26.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 236 beds and averages 175.4 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.43 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.57 to 1.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-15)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation, facility investigation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three residents (Resident R1), which resulted in actual harm when an unsupervised fall occurred, and Resident R1 sustained multiple rib fractures, punctured lung and hospitalization which resulted in death. This failure created an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Fall Prevention Program dated 4/21/23, indicated the purpose of this protocol is to provide guidance to the department of Military and Veterans Affairs (DMVA), Bureau of Veterans Homes (BVH), State Veterans Homes (SVHs) to assist in fall management and prevention reducing the risk of serious injury from falls. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he/she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodical assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and clinical record, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1) was free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a fracture of left femur (thigh bone). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 1/16/25, indicated the purpose of protocol is to give guidance to provide protections for the health, safety, welfare, and rights of each resident residing in the facility by prohibiting and preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraints not required to treat a resident's medical condition. The facility shall thoroughly investigate all allegations and include training for staff. The facility shall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective transfer interventions as per physician order to promote resident safety, resulting in a preventable accident and actual harm when the resident received a fracture of the left femur, for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer Devices dated 1/16/25, indicated this protocol is to provide guidance for the facility regarding enhancing the residents' quality of life, with the increased development of culture change, to the best abilities possible with resident agreement and tolerance by encouraging safe resident transfer independence while decreasing potential for injury to residents and staff. For the safety of the resident and staff, the facility incorporates the use of mechanical lifts, sliding boards, and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a resident's confidential personal and medical records for one of eight residents (Resident R4). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act dated 1/16/26, indicated that all staff must maintain the confidentiality and security of private health information in daily practice. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During an observation on 5/11/26, at 1:56 p.m. Resident R4 was observed in his room resting in a wheelchair, with a sign posted above is bed that stated I only eat pureed food. Review of Resident R4's clinical record failed to include any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of eight residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R11 and R164).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Transfers and discharge date d 1/16/26, indicated that for a transfer to another provider the following information must be provided to the receiving provider: Contact information of the practitioner who was responsible for the care of the resident Resident representative information, including contact information Advance directive information All other information necessary to meet the resident's needs, which includes, but may not be limited to: Resident status, including baseline and current mental, behavioral, and functional status, reason for transfer, recent vital signs Diagnoses and allergies Medications (including when last received)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for two of six residents (Resident R3, and R30).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Vital Signs, Height and Weight dated 1/16/26, indicated that weights are obtained on admission, and monthly. Weights may be taken on a more frequent schedule such as weekly or daily per physician order. Weights are recorded in the electronic health record. Review of the facility policy Transcription of Physician Orders, dated 1/16/26, indicated that physician orders will be added into the electronic medical record. All new physician orders for medications and treatments are to be reviewed and added to electronic medical administration record as written by the physician. To clarify an order the licensed staff must never add to or change the order in question. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R30 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based a review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident's specific nutritional interventions in a timely manner, and failed to develop an individualized care plan to address the resident's specific nutritional concerns for one of eight (Resident R189) records reviewed.Findings include: Review of facility policy Nutrition dated 1/16/26, indicated to indicate nutrition in the resident's total plan of care, to identify residents at risk of poor nutrition status, to facilitate communication with the health care team. Nutritional assessment and resident care plan documentation will be provided for all residents and provide initial and regular review of nutritional care. Initial nutritional assessment is completed by the Registered Dietitian within 7 days of admission to the facility. Nutrition care plans will be completed upon admission, and reviewed quarterly, and when a resident has a significant change in his/her nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (G- Tube, a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of four residents (Residents R149).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Enteral Feedings Gastrostomy last reviewed 1/16/26, indicated to elevate head of bed a minimum of 45 degrees (or as per physician order) and instruct resident to remain in that position during and for 45 minutes after the feeding for bolus feedings. For continuous feedings, head of bed must remain at a minimum of 45 degrees (or as per physician order) at all times, unless pump is stopped to provide care. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R149 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R149's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/5/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence medication regimen reviews (MRR) were reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for two of seven residents (Resident R3, and R4).Finding include: Review of the facility policy Drug Regimen Review, Monthly dated 1/16/26, indicated that the pharmacist will review the drug regimen of every resident's care levels every month and report results to the physician, and the physician will respond in the comment section. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/26/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and low back pain. Review of Resident R3's Medication Review Regimen dated 4/3/26, failed to include a response from the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, group interview, observations of resident areas and nursing units, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure anonymous grievance boxes are readily accessible for resident use on three of three floors (Second, Third, and Fourth Nursing Floor). Findings include: The facility Resident Rights policy dated 1/16/25, indicated that the resident has the right to make a complaint to the staff of the nursing home, or any other person, without fear of punishment or reprisal. The nursing home must address the issue promptly. During an observation on 4/21/25, at 2:30 p.m. no grievance boxes were located on the Second Nursing Floor where residents, resident representatives, or visitors could utilize, if needed. During an observation on 4/21/25, at 2:36 p.m. no grievance boxes were located on the Third Nursing Floor where residents, resident representatives, or visitors could utilize, if needed. During an observation on 4/21/25, 2:41 p.m. no grievance boxed were located on the Fourth Nursing Floor were residents, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for three of five residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R16, R19, and R38). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/27/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anemia (too little iron in the blood), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was transferred to the hospital on 4/14/25. Review of Resident R16's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, which included the resident's care plan goals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for five of five residents (Residents R16, R38, R104, R128, and R166). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/27/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anemia (too little iron in the blood), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was transferred to the hospital on 4/14/25. Review of Resident R16's clinical record, the facility failed to include documented evidence that the facility provided a written transfer notification to the Office of Long-Term Care Ombudsman for the hospitalization on 4/14/25. Review of Resident R38's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for five of six resident hospital transfers (Residents R16, R19, R38, R128, and R166). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/27/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, anemia (too little iron in the blood), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R16 was transferred to the hospital on 4/14/25, and remained out to the hospital during review on 4/24/25. Review of Resident R16's clinical record failed to include documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representative were provided with written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of five residents (Residents R13, R31, and R51). Findings include: Review of facility policy Supplemental Oxygen Therapy dated 1/16/25, indicated used cannulas, masks, and tubing shall be stored in a plastic bag, off the floor, labeled with the Resident's name, when not in use. Review of facility policy Noninvasive Ventilation: BiPAP, CPAP dated 1/16/25, indicated when not in use, assembled headgear, masks, and tubing shall be stored in a plastic bag, labeled with the resident's name and date. Review of Resident R13's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/3/25, indicated the diagnoses of coronary artery disease (narrow arteries decreasing blood flow to heart), hypertension (the force of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation for five of eight residents (Residents R13, R16, R21, R91, and R104). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Permitted Charges for Medical Records dated 1/16/25, indicated the medical record is an accounting of events and interactions between an individual and a healthcare provider. Medical records assist in analyzing trends in healthcare use, an individual's characteristics and quality of care. Review of the facility job description Registered Nurse (RN) indicated the RN is to record daily care performed for the residents on the appropriate forms and the approved electronic medical record and establish and maintain effective communication with resident, family, and staff. Review of Resident R13's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for one of five residents (Resident R88). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R88's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/13/25, indicated diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), anxiety, and constipation. During an observation on 4/21/25, at 12:18 p.m. Resident R88's call bell was observed on the floor under the resident's bed. During an interview on 4/21/25, at 12:19 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E2 confirmed Resident R88's call bell was not accessible and unavailable for use to the resident and that the facility failed to accommodate Resident R88's call bell needs. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 211.10(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of six residents (Residents R51 and R113). Findings include: Review of facility policy MDS 3.0 Completion, Maintenance, and Submission dated 1/16/25, indicated all disciplines shall follow the guidelines in Chapter 3 of the current RAI Manual for coding each assessment. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: - Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs - Question O0110C1, Oxygen therapy: Code continuous or intermittent oxygen administered via mask, cannula, etc., delivered to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet care needs for two of eight residents (Residents R40 and R89). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans last reviewed on 1/16/25, indicated that facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/3/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (low levels of iron in the blood), high blood pressure, and Parkinson's Disease (neuromuscular disorder causing tremors and difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect resident's current needs for three of six residents (Residents R29, R85, and R88). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans (Nursing Care) dated 1/16/25, indicated the care plan will describe, at a minimum, the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R29 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/20/25, indicated diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys cease to function on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), hypertension (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), and diabetes (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of professional practice for two of five residents (Residents R21 and R104). Findings include: Review of the facility job description Registered Nurse (RN) indicated the RN is to record daily care performed for the residents on the appropriate forms and the approved electronic medical record and establish and maintain effective communication with resident, family, and staff. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/6/25, indicated diagnoses of constipation, hypocalcemia (low levels of calcium in the blood), and Vitamin D deficiency. Review of a progress note dated 4/6/25, completed by RN Employee E16 stated, Resident continues to have menial tasks for staff that she requests one at a time. She first had RN go to her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents received proper treatment for pressure ulcers for two of four residents (Residents R21 and R88) and failed to make certain that residents received the necessary services to prevent pressure ulcers/wounds from developing for one of four residents (Resident R133). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Management of Pressure Injuries dated 1/16/25, indicated the facility will use a standardized plan for defining, assessing, documenting, and implementing strategies for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries on all residents. Braden Scale will be the instrument used to determine the potential or actual risk for pressure ulcers. Residents who score between 15-18 are at risk. Utilization of pressure relieving devices, including special mattresses, elbow, and heel protectors may be used. Residents with pressure ulcers shall receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain consistent dialysis communication was maintained for two of three residents. (Residents R33 and R104). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pre and Post Dialysis dated 1/16/25, indicated prior to departing the unit for transfer to dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney), the licensed staff will complete the Dialysis Communication Form with each transfer to the dialysis clinic. Upon return to the unit, the licensed staff will complete the return portion of the Dialysis Communication Form and file in the appropriate section of the chart. If no communication form is received, please call dialysis, and have one faxed to the facility. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of four residents (Residents R7 and R51). Findings include: Review of facility policy Culturally Competent, Trauma Informed Care dated 1/16/25, indicated the purpose of this protocol is to provide guidance to the facility to guide staff in providing appropriate, culturally competent care to residents who have experienced a trauma and to safeguard re-traumatization by employing supportive services related to minimizing triggers. The facility will assess each resident for a history of trauma and cultural preferences, upon admission, annually and with significant change. This will include asking the resident about triggers that may be stressors or may prompt recall of a previous traumatic event, discussing cultural needs and social history. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluation for one of three nurse aide (NA) personnel records (NA Employee E18). Findings include: Review of CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) §483.35(d)(7) Regular in-service education. The facility must complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews. In-service training must comply with the requirements of §483.95(g). Review of NA Employee E18's personnel record indicated she was hired to the facility on 5/2/22. Review of personnel records did not include an annual performance evaluation based on the date of hire for NA Employee E18. Interview on 4/22/25, at 1:16 p.m. Human Resource's Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluation based on date of hire for NA Employee E18. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (b) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1)(3) Management

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices related to the care of indwelling urinary catheters (tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine) for one of three residents reviewed (Residents R107). Findings include: Review of facility policy Urinary Catheter Procedures dated 1/16/25, indicated the purpose is to promote a healthy urinary tract, promote continence, and to maintain healthy skin integrity. To achieve free flow of urine the collection bags, tubing is never to touch the floor. Review or facility policy Infection Control Plan dated 1/16/25, indicated policy is to maintain a consistent, comprehensive approach to the prevention and management of infections. The goal of the program is to provide a safe and sanitary environment, decrease the risk of infection to residents, and correct problems relating to infection control practices. Review of Resident R107's clinical record indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for five of seven residents (Resident R25, R88, R89, R90, and R94) failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for three of five resident records (Residents R88, R89, and R90) and failed to complete a bed safety risk assessment for three of four resident (R88, R89, and R90). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Simple Dressing Change last reviewed 4/19/24, indicated to clean wound with normal saline or prescribed cleanser. Follow procedure for wound cleansing/irrigation. Review of facility policy Wound Care last reviewed 4/19/24, indicated the implementation of medication procedures according to physician orders and established facility guidelines to ensure the standards of resident care are delivered in wound therapy. Review of facility policy Bed Entrapment Zone Inspection last reviewed 4/19/24, indicated entrapment is an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide access to medical records to a resident or representative within a 24 hour period and/or to provide copies of medical records to the resident or representative within 48 hours for one of three residents (Resident R202). Findings include: Review of facility documents indicated that a request for a copy of medical records by a representative of Resident R202 was received on 11/21/23 and was never sent. During an interview on 5/8/24, at 1:15 p.m. Medical Records Employee E2 stated that she received the signed request from Resident R202's representative on 11/21/23, but did not send them, she misunderstood the regulation. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan after a diet update for one of four residents (Resident R119). Findings include: A review of facility policy Support Plans/Comprehensive Care reviewed 4/19/24 , indicated it shall be revised within 30 days upon completion of the annual assessment or upon changes in the resident's needs as indicated on the current assessment. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), malaise and dry eye syndrome. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 2/12/24, indicated the diagnosis remained current. A review of resident physician's orders dated 4/9/24 indicated that Resident R119s tube feeding was discontinued. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for two of four residents (Residents R2 and R25). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(c)(2) A resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/8/24, at 1:25 p.m. indicated the facility does not have a policy on assistive devices or palm guards (a splint for the hand). Review of the admission record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/18/24, indicated the diagnoses of diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), peripheral vascular disease (a condition in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, incident reports and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents (Resident R140) and resulted in a cat bite for two of three residents (Residents R14 and R119). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Incidents and Accidents dated 4/19/24, indicated the protocol is to provide guidance to assist with maintaining the Residents' safety and prevention of serious injury to the extent possible. Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a method of problem solving used for identifying the root cause of faults or problems. It includes the process of learning from consequences wherein healthcare providers take a step back and gain knowledge from near misses, or adverse events to prevent recurrence. Review of the facility policy Wandering/Elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent, and complete communication with the dialysis center for three of three residents reviewed (Residents R35, R81, and R106), and failed to have accurate physician orders and care plan for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R106). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Pre and Post Dialysis dated 4/19/24, indicated prior to departing the unit for transfer to dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney), the licensed staff will complete the Dialysis Communication Form with each transfer to the dialysis clinic. Upon return to the unit, the licensed staff will complete the return portion of the Dialysis Communication Form and file in the appropriate section of the chart. If no communication form is received, please call dialysis, and have one faxed to the facility. Check thrill by palpating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of facility documentation and interviews with staff determined that the facility failed to have enough staff to meet residents needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he/she was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodical assessment of resident needs) dated 11/16/23, indicated diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions (presence of one or more delusions- psychosis lost touch with reality), repeated falls , and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances (dementia affects your thinking, memory, reasoning, personality, mood and behavior with behavioral disturbances). Review of Resident R1 care plan initiated 11/6/23, revealed Resident R1 problem resident is at risk for falls with the goal of remain injury free, and the approach was to have staff supervison 1:1 due to high fall risk and frequent falls. Review of the clinical record failed to include further documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that the residents were protected from neglect in the facility which placed the residents in Immediate Jeopardy situations. Findings include: Review of job description Veterans Extended Care Facility Commandant (Nursing Home Administrator/NHA) last dated 2/1/22, stated The employee in this position is responsible for managing, directing and controlling all health - care activities and management functions at the Southwestern Veterans Center (SWVC), Department of Military and Veterans Affairs (DMVA). The facility provides nursing, personal and Domiciliary care, treatment, and restorative and rehabilitative services for veterans requiring long - term care. Direct and coordinate administrative functions with therapeutic functions to support resident care and treatment. Develop and maintain, with input from staff managers and department heads, written policies to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents, resident council minutes and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement the grievance process in accordance with Federal regulations for one of one resident concern (Resident R1) and for three of three months of resident concerns voiced during resident council meetings (8/23, 9/23, and 10/23). Findings include: A review of facility policy Resident Grievance Process last reviewed 5/17/23, indicated that the facility has a standardized system to resolve resident grievances in a timely manner. The facility will ensure conformity to Federal and State regulations for resident rights. The facility will guarantee all residents have the Right to complain, including the right to: present grievances to the staff of the facility, or any other person without fear of reprisal, prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances, and register a complaint with the survey agency and or local ombudsman. A review of the facility's grievance log and resident council minutes including concern resolutions failed to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents, facility provided documents of incidents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse to the state agencies in a timely manner for two of two reporting opportunities. (11/3/23, and 11/4/23) Finding include: A review of facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property last reviewed on 5/17/23, indicated in Section 3 Reporting of alleged violations number 4 the facility will ensure that each covered individual shall report immediately the suspicion, A review of of the State Agency's facility provide documents dated 11/6/23, revealed that the facility reported two alleged abuse incidents that occurred on 11/3/23. A review of Nurse Aide Employee E 1's (NA) Due Process Conference documents date 11/15/23, it was revealed that NA Employee E1 notified the Director of Nursing on Saturday 11/4/23, of two alleged incidents of resident abuse that occurred on Friday 11/3/23. At this time, NA Employee E1 was instructed to report the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to provide requested sleeping arrangements for two of two residents. (Resident R1 and Resident R2) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical records indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis: rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disease affecting many joints, including those in the hands and feet), high blood pressure, intercostal pain - left lateral ribs (symptoms include tightness of the muscle, pain usually occurs with movement), abnormal posture - postural instability of trunk trunk control impairment) , age related osteoporosis without current fracture, insomnia Review of Resident R2's clinical records indicated that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis: mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$245,564 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $245,564 — penalty dated 2023-11-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 39A438. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next