Vincentian Home
111 Perrymont Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15237 · Non profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (412) 366-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.2% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.2% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.7% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 45.8–56.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.7–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.1–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 87.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.33 to 1.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility documents and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide complete documentation in response to a resident concern and failed to log concerns for one of three residents (Resident R53).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Grievance Policy dated 3/9/26, indicated the resident has the right to voice grievances in writing or orally to the facility or other agency or entity. Grievance Official/Nursing Home Administrator/Designee will be responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions. The Grievance Official/Designee will investigate and provide follow-up within 72 hours to resident/family member. The Pink Encounter Form is logged on the Encounter Form Log for tracking purposes. Review of Resident R53's Pink Encounter Form dated 5/14/26, indicated resident reported an incident that happened on 5/13/26, involving a comment made by Housekeeping Employee E8 to resident in front of the resident's visitor. Further review of R53's Pink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documentation, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for one of three residents (Resident R53).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed 3/9/26, indicated to maintain an environment where residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident's property. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/14/26, indicated diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), renal insufficiency (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), and high blood pressure.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set's (MDS -periodic assessment of care needs) to the required electronic system within the mandated time frame for two of six residents reviewed (Resident R51 and R85).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments, dated October 2025, indicated that Entry, Death and Facility and Discharge tracking MDS assessments must be completed and transmitted within 14 days of the event date. Resident R51 had a discharge date of 2/27/26. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge MDS completed for Resident R51. Resident R85 had a discharge date of 2/13/26. Further review of the clinical record failed to reveal a discharge MDS completed for Resident R51. During an interview on 5/27/26, at 1:00 p.m., Resident Nurse Assessment Coordinator 1 (RNAC1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician order for one of six residents (Resident R83).Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood enough to meet your body's needs), vascular dementia (cognitive decline caused by decreased blood flow to the brain) and diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident R83's a MDS annual assessment (minimum data assessment)- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/28/26, indicated the diagnosis remained current. A review of Resident R83's physician orders dated 3/17/26 indicated monitor blood pressure daily- call MD if BP > 140. A review of Resident R83's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for March and April 2026 revealed no daily blood pressure were taken. During an interview on 5/28/26, at 1:30 p.m. the Interim…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that medication regimen reviews (MRR) were completed and reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for two of five residents (Residents R10, and R13).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Regimen Review dated 3/9/26, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. Findings and recommendations are reported to the resident's attending physician, the facility's Medical Director and Director of nursing. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/7/26, indicated diagnoses of renal insufficiency (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), obstructive uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that prevents normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility to properly to properly store medication in two of three medication carts (First Floor 119 Hall Medication Cart and the Second Floor Low End Hall Medication Cart).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Drug Acquisition, Storage, Inspection, and Dispensing Last reviewed 3/9/26, indicated drugs used in the facility shall be labeled in accordance with current accepted principles and include:Appropriate contents, accessories, and cautionary instructions.Expiration date, when applicableMedications shall be stored under proper conditions as stated by the medication manufacturer to ensure stability of that medication. During an observation completed on 5/26/26, at 9:23 a.m. the First Floor 119 Hall Medication Cart contained the following: 1 Tube of Nystatin cream not stored in a bag and not labeled with a date opened as required. During an interview completed on 5/26/26, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E16 confirmed the above observation and that the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, menu, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the menu and preferences for three of eight residents (Resident R14, R30, and R49). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Therapeutic Diet Policy dated 3/9/26, indicated therapeutic diets must be prescribed and authenticated by the practitioners responsible for the care of the resident, or by a qualified dietitian or qualified nutrition professional as authorized by the medical staff and in accordance with state law. Review of the facility policy Meal Service to Residents dated 3/9/26, indicated Nutritional Services shall work with Nursing Services and the Registered Dietician to provide the correct meals to each resident. Residents shall be verified using the Diet Sheets and proper diet will be confirmed before plating and presenting the resident with their meal. Trays shall be assembled according to the residents' choice and delivered to the resident by Nurse Aides or Culinary staff. Review of Resident R14's Diet Sheet dated 5/26/26, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety on one of two Country Kitchens (Building Four Country Kitchen).Findings include: Observation on 5/26/26, at 9:27 a.m. of the Building Four Country Kitchen indicated a freezer filled with resident ice cream and frozen treats. The ice buildup in the base of the freezer floor was greater than eight inches thick. Tour and interview on 5/26/26, at 9:30 a.m. Dining Manager Employee E3 confirmed the ice buildup in the base of the freezer floor was greater than eight inches thick and not in accordance with professional standards for food service safety28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0844 — isolatedFollow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of regulations, documents submitted to the State agency and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the State agency of a change in the facility's Director of Nursing at the time of the change. Findings include: Review of facility provided Employee Information Sheet on 5/27/26, at 11:45 a.m. indicated the Director of Nursing started a leave on 5/14/26. Interview on 5/27/26, at 12:00 p.m. the Chief Nursing Officer Employee E2 confirmed the facility failed to notify the State Agency that the Interim Director of Nursing Employee E19 assumed the position on 5/14/26. 28 PA Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, clinical record review, facility documents, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of two residents (Resident R15).Findings include: Review of facility policy Hand Hygiene last reviewed 3/9/26, indicated always follow standard precautions, gloves shall be worn when contact with -blood, bodily fluids, mucus membranes, dressings, non-intact skin. Change gloves and discard after each resident. Change gloves when moving from a contaminated body site to a clean site. Review of the facility policy Skin and Wound Assessment last reviewed 3/9/26, indicated the facility will provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and cross-contamination. Physician's orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of changes. Guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings include but not inclusive to:Wash and dry hands thoroughly. Put on clean gloves.Establish a clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for two of three crash carts (Second Floor High Side Crash Cart and Second Floor Low Side Crash Cart).Findings include: Review of the facility Emergency Crash Cart policy dated 3/9/26, indicated the facility shall maintain an Emergency/Crash Cart in a readily accessible location to provide emergency equipment and supplies for resident emergencies. Minimum Crash Cart Contents include but are not inclusive of: Portable suction equipment. Weekly Crash Cart Checks: The nursing supervisor or designee shall verify:Crash carts are present and accessibleOxygen tank is adequately filledNo visible missing equipment. Following any emergency the nursing staff or nursing supervisor shall be responsible for re-stocking supplies or used equipment. During an observation completed on 5/27/26, at 11:39 a.m. it was revealed that the Second Floor High Side Crash Cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation to rule out physical abuse or neglect for one of three residents (discharged Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed 3/23/26, indicated to maintain an environment where residents are free from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident's property. All residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers and resident representatives are encouraged to report and suspected acts of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property or exploitation. The facility must take the following actions in response to an alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment:Thoroughly investigate the alleged violationPrevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation is in progressTake appropriate corrective, because of investigation findings.Abuse is the willful infliction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one of three residents (discharged Resident R1) and failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of three resident hospital transfers (discharged Resident R1, discharged Resident R2 and Resident R3).Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Notice of Transfer or Discharge last reviewed 3/23/26, indicated before this facility transfers or discharges a resident admission coordinator/designee shall notify the resident/representative of the transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing and in the language and manner they understand. Record the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility policy Notice of Bed Hold and Return last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, documents, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined was determined that the facility failed to protect resident from neglect for one of three residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed 3/19/25, stated it is the policy of the facility to maintain an environment where residents are free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy Resident Transfer Protocol last reviewed 3/19/25, stated appropriate transfer techniques shall be used according to each resident's strength, stamina, and ability to assist with the residents. Necessity for the amount and type of assistance shall be assessed upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of neglect within 24 hours to the local state field office for one of three residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Incident-Clinical Protocol last reviewed 3/19/25, stated anyone who witnesses, discovers or is involved in an incident is responsible for reporting to the Licensed Nurse on the unit as soon as possible, on the day of discovery. In the event, that it was determine the :incident was reportable to the State Agency , it will be done timely and submitted by the Director of Nursing or Designees. Review of the facility policy Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed 3/19/25, stated it is the policy of the facility to maintain an environment where residents are free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, documents, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the appropriate assistance for bed mobility was provided to prevent a roll out of bed for one of five residents (Residents R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Transfer Protocol last reviewed 3/19/25, stated appropriate transfer techniques shall be used according to each resident's strength, stamina, and ability to assist with the residents. Necessity for the amount and type of assistance shall be assessed upon admission and on an ongoing basis. Review of the facility policy Falls and Falls with Major Injury last reviewed 3/19/25, stated all facility staff is responsible for implementing the intent and directives contained within this policy, and for creating a safe environment of care. It is the facility's policy to minimize the risk of falling, and injuries sustained from falls, without compromising the mobility and functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that that the facility failed to determine it was safe to self-administer medications, did not have a current order or care plan to self-administer medications, or an interdisciplinary assessment for one of five residents (Resident R302). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medications by Residents last reviewed 3/19/25, indicated self-administration of medication is the ability of a resident to take medications independently without assistance from another person. The resident shall be assessed for competency using the assessment for self-administration of medications. The results shall be documented in the resident's record and care plan. Specific orders for self-administration of medication shall be documented in the resident's medical record and care plan. Each resident's medication shall be clearly labeled by the prescribing pharmacy. Review of the facility policy Skin and Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have physician order specifications relating to the size of indwelling catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) and balloon inflation amount (secures catheter to bladder) for one of three residents (Resident R305). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Foley Catheter Care last reviewed 3/19/25, indicates to maintain a closed, sterile drainage system and minimize the risk of infection. Obtain physician order for foley catheter use. Include bulb and catheter size, frequency of catheter changes and catheter care instructions. Review of admission record indicated Resident R305 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), chronic kidney disease (affects the kidneys ability to filter waste), and urinary retention (bladder doesn't completely empty). Review of Resident R305's physician orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, clinical record review, and staff, resident, and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of five residents (Residents R67 and R307). Findings include: Review of the facility policy C-PAP/Bi-PAP Storage dated 3/19/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to store CPAP (a method of positive pressure ventilation used with patients who are breathing spontaneously) machine in a clean dry environment. When not in use, place clean mask in a plastic bag (not airtight). Review of the facility policy Oxygen Concentrators-Usage and Care last reviewed 3/19/25, indicates Nasal cannulas, masks, tubing and water bottles are to be changed weekly. The water bottle and tubing are to be dated and stored in a plastic bag attached to the concentrator when not in use. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anemia (a condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate provision of medications for one of five residents (Resident R250). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Pharmacy Requirements last reviewed 3/19/25, indicated regular and reliable pharmaceutical service is available to provide residents with prescriptions and non-prescriptions medications, services, and related equipment and supplies. Pharmacy services will be provided routine and timely. Review of Residents R250's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 4/24/25, with diagnoses of anemia (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells), calculus of kidney, and Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to carry out daily tasks). Review of Resident R250's physician order dated 4/24/25, indicated to administer two tablets of TheraLith XR (medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for one of four nursing units (Building 2-2) failed to properly store medical supplies in two of five medication carts (County high hall and Country low hall ) and two of four medication rooms (Beach hall high and Country hall high). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Storage last reviewed 3/19/25, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufactures recommendations or those of the supplier. Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications are allowed access to medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medications supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access. Review of the facility policy Medication Administration last reviewed 3/19/25, indicated the individual administering a medication shall be aware of the following information including but not inclusive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that that the facility failed to implement a surveillance plan for tracking, and monitoring residents who tested negative for COVID during an outbreak for six of six months (August 2024 to February 2025) and failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R67) Review of the Respiratory Virus Outbreak Toolkit dated 11/14/24, indicated a case-line listing is designed to collect information about all ill cases (residents and staff) during an outbreak in a long-term care facility. It was indicated upon identification of an outbreak, use this template to collect and organize information on cases. The type of test ordered and if pathogens were detected must be recorded. A review of the facility policy Skin and Wound Assessment, last reviewed 3/19/25, guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings indicates step in procedures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for three out of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R17, R38, and, R93). Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfers Between Facility and Hospital dated 4/17/24, indicated a resident Transfer and Referral record must be completed in full and sent with the resident. The following information shall be included: the reason for the transfer, the resident's physical status, the resident's psychosocial status, a summary of care, treatment, and services the resident has received, the resident's progress towards goals, a list of community resources or referrals made or provided to the patient, and the resident's normal level of ADL prior to the illness requiring transfer to the acute hospital. The complete medical record shall be sent with the resident, including completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for three of four residents (Resident R17, R38, and R93). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.15(c)(5) Contents of the notice. The written notice specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section must include the following: (i) The reason for transfer or discharge; (ii) The effective date of transfer or discharge; (iii) The location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; (iv) A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; (v) The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed by the physician for one of five residents (Resident R174), failed to perform weekly skin assessments per physician order for three of ten residents (Resident R50, R382, and R385), and failed to obtain weekly labs for one of six residents (Resident R50). Findings include: Review of facility policy Skin Assessment dated 4/17/24, indicated the facility will assess all resident's skin integrity and identify those at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The nurse will complete a skin assessment upon admission/readmission and weekly times four weeks, minimally. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's MDS (Minimum Data Set- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/4/24, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), dementia (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain a diagnosis for hospice services and to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end of life care for three of three residents (Resident R17, R53, R62). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Hospice Services dated 4/17/24, indicated that care for the dying resident shall be a collaborative effort between the staff of the designated hospice provider and the staff of the long term care facility. The facility will obtain information from hospice that includes names and contact information for hospice staff involved in the resident's care, and how to access the hospice's 24 hour on-call system. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 17's MDS (Minimum Data Set- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/22/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of six residents (Resident R114). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Medication Administration dated 4/17/24, indicated that medications shall be administered only upon the order of physicians. No medication shall be left at the resident's bedside. The nurse administering the medication shall stay with the resident until the medication is taken. If a medication has been opened and is refused by a resident, it shall be destroyed. Review of Resident R114's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R114's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/20/24, indicated diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries), osteoporosis (condition when the bones become brittle and fragile), and anxiety. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to prevent accidents for one of four residents (Resident R13), and ensure that residents received neurological assessments after an incident involving an unwitnessed fall for two of four residents (Residents R54 and R81). Findings include: The facility Falls and Falls with Major Injury policy dated 4/26/23, last reviewed 4/17/24, indicated it is the facility policy to minimize the risk of falling, and injuries sustained from falls, without compromising the mobility and functional independence of residents. It was indicated after a fall, if a resident has just fallen or is found in the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities, and complete neurological checks for 72 hours. It was indicated neurological checks must be performed 4x for 15 minutes, 4x for 30 minutes, 4x for one hour, 4x for four hours, and 4x for four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician order for a urinary catheter (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine) for one of three residents (Resident R385), and failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a urinary catheter as required for two of three residents (Resident R49, and R385). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Indwelling urinary catheter insertion and Maintenance, dated 4/17/24, indicated that a resident should have a physician's order for a catheter that includes the type of catheter and the purpose for the catheter. Change catheters and drainage bags based on physician order. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 49's MDS (Minimum Data Set- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/30/24, indicated diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and address significant weight loss in a timely manner for one out of five residents (Resident R78), failed to obtain daily weights for two out of five residents (Resident R114 and R382), and failed to notify physician of weight gain per physician orders for one out of five residents (R114). Findings include: Review of facility policy Weighing and Measuring the Resident dated 4/17/24, indicated the threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria: 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe 3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R78's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure one of four medications carts reviewed (Building One Second Floor Low Side Med Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Drug Acquisition, Storage, Inspection, and Dispensing dated 4/17/24, indicated medications shall be stored in a secure manner. Lockable medication carts shall be used to store unit-of-use medications in the resident medication dose system. These carts shall be locked when not attended. During an observation on 5/28/24, at 10:09 a.m. the Building One Second Floor Low Side Med Cart was observed unlocked and unattended with the top drawer pulled open. During an interview on 5/28/24, at 10:10 a.m. Registered Nurse Employee E2 confirmed that the medication cart was unattended, unlocked, and the top drawer was pulled open. During an interview on 5/28/24, at 1:31 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to properly secure one of four medications carts reviewed (Building One Second Floor Low Side Med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with standards of practice and physicians' orders regarding surgical site care which resulted in a failure of timely care for three of five residents (Residents R1, R2, and Closed Record CR1). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy, Skin Assessment dated 4/26/23, indicated: -Non-pressure related skin conditions include but is not limited to skin tear, arterial ulcer, venous ulcer, foot problem, surgical wound, rash, cut, laceration, open lesion, or burn. -The licensed nurse will complete a head to toe skin assessment within two to six hours of admission/readmission to identify the presence of any skin issue. -If a non-pressure area is identified, will document a complete assessment on the N. Adv Skin Only Evaluation and reassess weekly until healed. -Describe the treatment order and response to treatment. Review of admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience to the residents of one of five nursing units/country kitchen (Building Two, Floor Two). Findings include: A review of facility policy Resident Rights dated 10/18/23, indicated that residents of the facility have a right to a dignified existence. During an observation on 10/19/23, at 9:00 a.m., it was revealed that the facility was utilizing disposable styrofoam products to serve the residents their breakfast meal for residents of the Building Two, Floor Two Nursing unit/Country Kitchen. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 9:30 a.m., the Food Service Manager Employee E1 confirmed that the facility's dish machine located at Building Two, Floor Two Nursing unit/Country Kitchen had been non operational for an extended undetermined length of time, Food Service Manager Employee E1 also confirmed that the facility was using disposable styrofoam products to serve residents all of their meals. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 2:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain equipment vital to the operation of the facility in proper working condition for one of five country kitchens (Building Two, Floor Two). Finding include: A review of the facility's policy Preventative Maintenance of Equipment reviewed on 4/26/23, and 10/18/23, revealed that the facility maintains equipment vital to the operation of the facility in proper working order. During an interview on 10/19/23, at 9:30 am Food Service Manager Employee E1 it was revealed that the dish machine located at Building Two, Floor Two Country kitchen was non operational for an extended period of time. The Food Service Manager Employee E1 further confirmed that the facility does not maintain maintance logs for dietary department equipment. It is the procedure of the facility's dietary department to request repair service from an out side repair company. The dietary department failed to maintain records of these repair requests thus resulting in an uncompleted timeline for the repair of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZZARA, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2016 |
| BECKETT, CHRISTINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2017 |
| BELLIN, ELAINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2018 |
| ENGLISH, KATHLEEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2019 |
| HART, TERENCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2011 |
| SEVERIN, ANTOINETTE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2018 |
| STRANO, AMY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/03/2020 |
| WALL, RACHEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/27/2020 |
| WOLF, DEBRA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/17/2020 |
| BAKER, THOMAS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/07/2023 |
| BALL, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/28/2023 |
| OWREY, DEAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2021 |
| VINCENTIAN COLLABORATIVE SYSTEM | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/17/1995 |
| ROMITO, SAMANTHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/26/2025 |
| KOMAN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/26/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395034. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.