No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quarryville Presbyterian Retirement Community

625 Robert Fulton Highway, Quarryville, PA 17566 · Non profit - Church related · 130 certified beds · (717) 786-7321 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (717) 786-7321 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
317 Chestnut St · (717) 786-7383 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1135 Hampden Dr · (717) 687-0313 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
100 Townsedge Dr · (717) 786-7301 · Call to confirm hours
Park
SECA Park0.5 mi
299 Park Ave · (717) 806-0123 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
611 Robert Fulton Hwy · (717) 786-7559

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.4%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.7%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.5%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.4%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.6%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.661.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.481.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.9%CMS range 52.4–69.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.5–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.2–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
20.7%
Total nursing turnover
11.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 93.1 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-30)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes and information provided to residents, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances of the Resident Council. Findings Include: Resident Council meeting minutes for June 30, July 28 and August 25, 2025, revealed that residents brought up repeat concerns regarding food temperatures and flies in the dining room. During each meeting the residents were reminded that any dining concerns with food temperatures were to be brought to their attention immediately so they could make necessary adjustments at the time of the complaint. The residents were also reminded that there was regularly scheduled pest control visits and multiple remedies in place to control the flies as best as possible. At June's meeting they were to notify the pest control company. An interview with a group of residents on August 28, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that the food was not hot and they brought flies up three times and the facility didn't do anything about it. Pest control records for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for four of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 28, 36 and 78).Findings Include: A facility policy for psychotropic medication management dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the facility will minimize the use of psychotropic medications, avoid unnecessary drug use, and promote the use of non-pharmacological interventions whenever possible. Psychotropic medications include antipsychotics (class of drugs used to treat mental health conditions), antianxiety medications, antidepressants, and hypnotics (induce sleep and sedation). Physician’s orders for Resident 3, dated May 30, 2025, revealed that the resident was to receive 1 milligram (mg) of transdermal (application of a medicine through the skin) Ativan gel twice daily as needed for agitation. Review of Resident 3’s Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of two ice machines (main kitchen). Findings include: The facility's policy for ice machines, dated March 31, 2025, revealed that every month the ice machines were to have the ice removed, the inside of the machine washed with sanitizing solution and a clean cloth, allowed to dry, and then refilled with ice. A third party vendor would come in quarterly and as needed to service the ice machine. A Service log, dated March 3, 2025, revealed that preventative maintenance was performed by a contracted service. There was no documented evidence that the ice machine was cleaned on a monthly basis. Observations on August 27, 2025, at 9:02 a.m. revealed that inside the ice machine there was a build up of a pink substance on the right hand corner of the white plastic piece and a build up of a black substance on the entire length of the strip at the top of the ice machine. The chest was full of ice.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of a psychotropic medication (medications that affect the person's mental state, emotions and behavior) and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 36).Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated June 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively impaired, was rarely or never understood, had physical, verbal and other behaviors not directed towards others, took antipsychotic medications (medications used to treat psychosis and other mental and emotional conditions), antianxiety and antidepressant medications (psychotic medications), and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete nurse aide registry verification for one of three new nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide XX) and failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses were checked with the State Board of Nursing for one of one newly hired nurses reviewed (Registered Nurse XX).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding abuse prohibition, dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the prior to the first day of employment, the facility would verify with the Pennsylvania Department of Health Nurse Aid Registry the standing/certification of all applicants offered employment as a nurse aide. The facility would not employ individuals who had a finding entered in the nurse aide registry or who had a disciplinary action in effect against their professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of their property or mistreatment of residentsThe personnel file for Nurse Aide E3 revealed that she was hired as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's baseline care plan included information regarding the resident's immediate care needs for one of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 101). Findings include: An admission note for Resident 101, dated August 21, 2025, at 12:16 p.m., revealed that the resident arrived at the facility and had sinusitis (an inflammation of the sinuses) and was going to receive medication for three more days. A current care plan for the resident, dated August 21, 2025, indicated that the resident had an infection diagnosed as sinusitis. A progress note for Resident 101, dated August 22, 2025, at 3:01 p.m. revealed that the resident was positive for COVID and was in respiratory isolation. Observations during the facility tour on August 27, 2025, at 11:34 a.m. revealed a stop sign on Resident 101's door. Interview with staff during the tour indicated that the resident was placed on droplet precautions due to testing positive for covid on admission. There was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 10 and 88). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Care Plans dated March 31, 2025, indicated that it is the facility’s policy that each resident receives individualized, comprehensive, and coordinated care through the development, implementation and ongoing evaluation of an interdisciplinary care plan. The development of a comprehensive care plan should occur by the interdisciplinary team following the initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated July 17, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was usually understood and was able to sometimes understand others, required assistance with care needs, took an anticoagulant medication (used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 39 residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 9). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Care Plans dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the resident’s plan of care should be updated as necessary on an on-going basis. Changes will be communicated to team members as needed or indicated. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 7 dated August 4, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood, could understand, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included a stroke. Interview with Resident 7 on August 28, 2025, at 1:43 p.m. indicated that he currently had an indwelling catheter, and no other to have straight catheterization (single-use tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Physician’s order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for one of 39 residents reviewed who used a electric lifting recliner chair (Resident 6) and failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 15).Findings Include: A facility policy for wheelchair leg rests dated March 31, 2025, indicated that the facility would ensure and promoted safe and appropriate use of wheelchairs leg rests when transporting residents short or long distances. Wheelchair leg rests should be used when transporting residents over klong distances or when a resident is unable to lift their leg rests while the chair is in motion. Wheelchair leg rests should also be used when resident cannot or will not [NAME] their legs for short transports. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a toileting program was followed to maintain a resident's continence for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: A facility policy related to restorative nursing programs, dated March 31, 2025, indicated that facility provides individualized restorative nursing interventions in accordance with resident needs, care plans, and regulatory requirements to promote and maintain the highest level of physical, mental and psychosocial functioning for residents. Restorative interventions may include bowel and bladder programs that consist of training and toileting schedules. Restorative programs will be carried out by trained restorative nursing assistants, nurse aides, or licensed staff as delegated. Restorative interventions, frequency, and outcomes will be documented in the medical record per facility policy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician's discharge summary was completed prior to or at the time of discharge for one of two closed records (Resident 83). Findings include: Review of Resident 83's clinical record revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility on July 2, 2024. Further review of Resident 83's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the discharge summary was completed by the physician prior to or at the time of discharge. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 10, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. confirmed that the discharge summary was not completed. 28 Pa Code 211.5(d) Clinical record

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control prevention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) were in place for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions for one of four residents reviewed (Residents 2). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated March 2024, revealed EBP will be used in the care of any residents who are at higher risk of colonization or infection with multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). Use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions is a strategy for improved success for infection control and to expand on standard precautions. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are designed to reduce the risk of transmission and/or colonization of MDROs from both recognized and unrecognized sources. Enhanced Barrier Precautions require gowns and gloves to be worn during any high-contact resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/26/2000
ASTON, DIANEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/26/2007
CLAUSEN, JOELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2008
HAYWARD, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2004
FIOL, BRUCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/17/1997
HARR, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/12/2012
HARTZELL, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/02/2011
MACKENZIE, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/21/2005
PETERS, BRUCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/21/1994
RICHARDSON, GUYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/28/2005
SCHEMPP, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/06/2014
SNELLER, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/11/2011
VANGILST, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/21/2004
WEBSTER, GUYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/12/2012
YOUNGDALE, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/09/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$25.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 7%Other / private 53%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,008per resident / day
operating cost
$30,654per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$870per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395336. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next