Wyomissing Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

23.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 97.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for two of five sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 4)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, aphasia (inability to speak), and history of a stroke (a medical condition involving the interruption of blood flow to a part of the brain resulting in brain damage). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had an abdominal feeding tube through which he received nutrition and medications. A physician's order dated December 27, 2025, directed staff to administer a medication (amlodipine besylate) daily for hypertension. Review of Resident 1's January 2026 medication administration records (MAR) revealed there was no documented evidence that staff administered this medication at 2:00 p.m., as scheduled, on January 2, 2026. A physician's order dated December 26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services as ordered by the physician to promote healing and prevent new pressure sores for two of five sampled residents who had pressure sores. (Resident 2, 3) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled Wound Management Protocols- Pressure Ulcers, dated January 2026, revealed that physician/wound consultant would determine the most appropriate treatment to manage a wound, and staff would refer to individual product package and physician order for detailed instructions for use in the care of pressure ulcers.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included a seizure disorder and metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction cause by metabolic disturbances leading to confusion, memory loss and altered consciousness). A review of Resident 2's admission skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered medication was available from the pharmacy for two of seven sampled residents. (Residents 1, 7)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neoplasm (tumor) related pain and pancreatic cancer. A review of the care plan revealed interventions for staff to administer medications as ordered by the physician. On February 7, 2026, a physician ordered for staff to administer oxycodone (a pain medication) every three hours as needed for severe pain. On February 9, 2026, a nurse noted that the resident complained of pain and that she was unable to administer the oxycodone medication because it was unavailable. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (damage to nerves caused by diabetes) and diabetes. On February 5,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to file timely reports of allegations of abuse to officials, including the State Survey Agency, for two of six sampled residents. (Residents 3 and 5)Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Policy - Prevention and Management, last reviewed August 2025, revealed that the facility prohibited abuse, mistreatment, neglect, and exploitation, for all residents. Procedures to prohibit abuse included the reporting of incidents, investigations, and the facility's response to the results of their investigations immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected neglect or abuse. The designee was to report allegations involving abuse or neglect to the appropriate state and local authorities. Incidents resulting in no serious bodily injury were to be reported no later than 24 hours after identifying a suspicion of abuse. Clinical record review revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality as required by the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards by failing to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) conducted assessments for two of five sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 2) Findings include:Review of Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State Chapter 21, State Board of Nursing, indicated that under Responsibilities of the RN, 21.11, General Functions. (a) The registered nurse assesses human responses and plans, implements and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible, and (b) The registered nurse is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care delivered.The 21.145 Functions of the LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse], (a) . The LPN participates in the planning,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to verify professional license/registration status prior to the start of employment for two of five newly hired employees. (Employee 1 and Employee 2) Findings include:A review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Policy- Prevention and Management, dated August 2024, revealed that the facility would conduct screening for all potential hires. This would include an inquiry to the state nurse aide registry, and they would record the results of the screening. Employee 1 (E1) had been working in the facility as a nurse aide since May 26, 2025, and an inquiry to the state nurse aide registry was not completed until August 27, 2025.Employee 2 (E2) had been working in the facility as a nurse aide since June 30, 2025, and an inquiry to the state nurse aide registry was not completed until August 27, 2025.In an interview on August 28, 2025, at 9:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documented evidence that the state nurse aide registry verification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0620 — isolated
  Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document an inventory of personal belonging on admission for one of 19 sample residents. (Resident 58)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Inventory/Personal Belongings, dated January 2025, revealed that a documented inventory of all residents' personal belongings was to be completed upon admission by the nursing department and that the inventory was to be kept in the clinical record. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the clinical record that the facility documented an inventory of the resident's personal belongings. In an interview on August 28, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documented inventory of the resident's personal belongings in the clinical record. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(2) Management. 28 Pa Code 201.24 (c) admission policy.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for three of 19 sampled residents. (Residents 12, 51, and 100)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease. On August 15, 2025, a physician ordered that staff obtain a blood test (a Complete Blood Count) on August 18, 2025. A review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence to support that the blood test was obtained as ordered. In an interview on August 28, 2025, at 9:29 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the ordered blood work was not done, and that nursing staff did not communicate the order to the laboratory. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 51 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, failure to thrive, and congestive heart failure. On August 2, 2025, a physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 20 sampled residents. (Resident 101) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 101 had diagnoses that included hypertension, heart disease, and dementia. Physician's orders dated July 25, 2024, directed staff to administer amlodipine and metoprolol (medications for high blood pressure) once daily; staff were to hold the medications if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the measure of the pressure when the heart beats) was below 100 millimeters mercury (mmHg). Staff were to also hold the metoprolol if the resident's heart rate was below 60 beats per minute. Review of the medication administration records for August and September 2024 revealed no evidence that staff obtained the resident's blood pressure before they administered amlodipine 12 times in August and one time in September. There was no evidence that staff obtained the resident's blood pressure or heart rate before they administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to promote foot health for one of 20 sampled residents. (Resident 12) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had cognitive impairment. A physician's order dated September 13, 2024, directed staff to consult podiatry services as needed. On October 23, 2024, at 11:22 a.m., the resident was observed in bed; her toenails were long and jagged. Review of a facility resident list dated July 15, 2024, revealed that the resident was identified as in need of podiatry services at that time. There was no evidence that the resident was seen by a podiatrist or provided with foot care. In an interview on October 24, 2024, at 9:34 a.m., the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA