Linwood Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
100 Linwood Avenue, Scranton, PA 18505 · Non profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (570) 346-7381 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $113,348 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-15)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.5% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.7% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.7% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 29.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.2%CMS range 48.3–62.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.5–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 29.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 66.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.2–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-09-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the call bell system was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance, by failing to ensure the call bell system was fully functional in three (100, 200 and 300) out of the four areas of the facility. The facility failed to identify the risks and safety of the residents who need to utilize their call bell for staff assistance placing the residents in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: A review of a facility documentation dated September 3, 2024, revealed on August 31, 2024, at approximately 7:00 PM the facility experienced a possible lightning strike causing the call bell alert system to malfunction. Upon the building assessment, it was noted the call bell system was not functioning in the 100, 200, and 300 Halls of the resident units. Further it was indicated the residents were provided tap call bells (non…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, facility investigative documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 1) remained free from emotional and psychosocial abuse, exploitation, and invasion of privacy when a staff member intentionally recorded the resident on a personal cellular telephone during toileting care and while the resident was using the toilet without the resident's knowledge or consent. This deficient practice resulted in actual psychosocial harm through humiliation, loss of dignity, and violation of the resident's privacy. This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance.Findings include:A review of a facility policy titled Resident Abuse & Neglect Prevention Program last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and exploitation. The policy indicated that each resident has the right to be free from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and select facility documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented a physician-ordered adaptive device (lidded cup) to mitigate the risk of injury from hot liquids for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 60) resulting in actual harm, a burn injury to the upper thigh area and failed to ensure nurse aides demonstrated the necessary skills and competencies to safely perform mechanical lift transfers for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 195). These failures resulted in actual harm to both residents. Findings include: A review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility February 1, 2024, with diagnoses to include dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility reports and the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from sexual abuse (Resident 48) and the facility neglected to provide the necessary care and services to prevent psychosocial and/or physical harm and physical discomfort for two residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 21 and 80). Findings include: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in the regulation. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. Each resident has the right to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, facility investigative documentation, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse, neglect, and exploitation for one of 10 residents reviewed for (Resident 1).Findings include:A review of a facility policy titled Resident Abuse & Neglect Prevention Program last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and exploitation. The policy indicated that each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment and neglect. The policy defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. The policy further defined mental, emotional, or psychosocial abuse as the verbal or nonverbal infliction of anguish, pain, or distress that results in mental or emotional suffering, including humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment, or deprivation. A review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, consultant pharmacist records, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and responded to consultant pharmacist recommendations for one resident (Resident 2) reviewed for medication regimen review. Findings include:A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a medical condition involving loss of cognitive functioning such as memory, thinking, and reasoning severe enough to interfere with daily activities). A review of the consultant pharmacist report titled Consultant Pharmacist Communication to Physician, dated November 12, 2025, revealed the pharmacist identified that Resident 2 had physician orders for three or more central nervous system (CNS) active medications. CNS medications are drugs that affect the brain and spinal cord and may influence mood, behavior, level of alertness, or pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's planned cycle menus and menu substitution records, observation of meal service, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow the planned menu for residents who required a pureed consistency diet for 9 of 9 residents reviewed with physician-ordered pureed diets (Residents 18, 23, 28, 45, 47, 61, 81, 9, and 92).Findings include: A review of the facility's planned cycle menu revealed that the lunch meal scheduled for March 5, 2026, included a dinner roll that was to be provided in a pureed form (a food consistency in which regular foods are blended or processed into a smooth, pudding-like texture without lumps, commonly ordered for individuals who have difficulty chewing or swallowing food safely), for residents ordered on a pureed consistency diet. Observation of the lunch meal service on March 5, 2026, between 12:00 P.M. and 12:45 P.M., revealed there were no pureed dinner rolls available on the tray line where meals were prepared and distributed to residents. Continued observation of the meal service revealed Residents 18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, test tray evaluation, review of food committee minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were served at safe and palatable temperatures for residents for 1 test tray evaluated for one of 4 hallways and 2 of 2 residents (Residents 102 and 103) who voiced concerns related to food temperature and palatability.Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements, the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A review of the facility food committee meeting minutes dated January 9,2026 revealed complaints related to food temperature, palatability (quality of food that makes it pleasant to eat including taste, smell, texture and appearance), stating that meal trays remain on the food carts in the hallway, waiting for staff to deliver to resident rooms, resulting in cold food. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included individualized and measurable interventions to address a resident's known behavioral needs for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 88).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, last reviewed by the facility on January 21, 2026, revealed the facility will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addresses each resident's identified needs. The policy indicated the care plan should include problems, needs, and individualized interventions related to the resident's social, emotional, psychosocial, physical, behavioral, rehabilitation, cultural, spiritual, nutritional, leisure, and preventative care needs based on assessment findings, resident involvement, observations, and interdisciplinary input. A review of Resident 88's clinical record revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality as required by the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to implement appropriate nursing practices for the administration of an intravenous (IV) medication via peripheral inserted central venous catheter (PICC) for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 102).Findings include:According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) require the following: The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered consistent with professional standard of practice for one resident out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 43).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration by Nasal Cannula (a medical device used to deliver oxygen by a small, flexible tube with two prongs that fit into the nostrils) and mask (a device worn over the nose and mouth through which oxygen is delivered) last reviewed February 19, 2026, indicated residents who require oxygen will have a physician order which includes the flow rate, how the oxygen will be administered, and the need for humidified air if necessary. The policy indicated the physician orders will also include oxygen tubing and bag will be changed monthly and dated when changed. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow its pain management policy and accepted standards of nursing practice by failing to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis, failing to ensure the pain medication order included the specific pain indication or severity level, and failing to evaluate the effectiveness of administered pain medication using a numeric pain scale for 1 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 102).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone that can cause significant pain, swelling, and damage to bone tissue) and bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream, which may spread infection throughout the body and may also result in pain or systemic illness). A review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate drug administration for one out of the 30 residents sampled (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances (medications regulated under federal law due to the potential for misuse or dependence requiring strict prescribing, storage, and record-keeping controls), last reviewed by the facility on February 19, 2026, revealed the facility will comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled medications. A clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include paraplegia, (paralysis or loss of movement and sensation that affects the lower half of the body) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation of medications, manufacturer guidance, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated when opened and failed to discard a multi-dose medication after the manufacturer's recommended use-by period on one of four medication carts (300 hall, cart 2).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Storing and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals, last reviewed by the facility on February 19, 2026, revealed it is the facility's expectation that staff record the date a medication container is opened and available for use on the primary medication container (for example, a vial, bottle, or inhaler). The policy revealed that when a multi-dose vial (a medication container designed to provide multiple doses for repeated use) of injectable medication is opened or accessed by needle puncture, the container must be dated and discarded within 28 days, unless the manufacturer specifies a different time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of employee personnel records, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the knowledge and competencies necessary to safely manage a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line) for 1 resident (Resident 102) of 16 residents reviewed who required care involving a PICC line.Findings include:Federal regulation requires that a facility develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff. The facility must use the facility assessment, which is an evaluation the facility conducts to identify the resident population served to determine the amount and types of training necessary to ensure staff competencies meet the needs of the residents as identified in their care plans and the facility assessment. Clinical record review revealed Resident 102 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from potential accident hazards for one out of four nursing units observed (300 Hall), including observations made of one out of 14 residents' rooms (Resident 1).Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Medication Administration Practice Recommendations, last reviewed by the facility on August 14, 2025, revealed it is facility policy that a nurse or qualified staff should stay with the resident until medication has been taken. A clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function). A physician's order for Tylenol tablet 325 mg (acetaminophen-a pain-relieving medication) with directions to give two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed for mild pain was initiated on April 2, 2025. A physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of behaviors and potential adverse consequences prior to administering psychoactive medications for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (a group of symptoms, such as stress, anxiety, feeling sad or hopeless, and physical symptoms that can occur after you go through a stressful life event), encephalopathy ( a medical condition characterized by a general dysfunction of the brain that affects cognitive function, consciousness, and behavior), and chronic pain. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process completed at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 14, 2025, indicated the resident had a BIMS (brief interview mental screener that aids in detecting cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the dietary department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Review of a facility policies titled Refrigerator and Frozen Food Storage last reviewed by the facility on February 18, 2025, indicated that all TCS (time, temperature, control foods)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN) to notify one of three residents reviewed (Resident 95) that Medicare Part A coverage for skilled nursing services was ending. Findings Include: A review of Resident 95's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 9, 2024, with diagnoses to include fusion of the spine (a surgical procedure that connects two or more vertebrae in the spine to eliminate movement between them, providing stability and pain relief). Review of the resident's Medicare coverage documentation revealed the last day of covered Medicare Part A services was February 24, 2025. Further review revealed the facility did not issue the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN) form to Resident 95 until February 25, 2025, after Medicare Part A coverage had ended. An interview conducted with the Director of Social Services on May 19, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 21 sampled (Resident 72). Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (an assessment tool utilized to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan, and the RAI also assists staff to evaluate goal achievement and revise care plans accordingly by enabling the facility to track changes in the resident's status) dated October 2024, Section N Medications Subsection N0350A: Insulin, indicate the number of days during the 7-day look-back period that the resident received insulin (a hormone medication used to treat diabetes) injections. A clinical record review revealed Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that is not possible, for one out of 21 residents sampled (Resident 51). Findings include: A facility policy titled Weighing of Residents, last reviewed by the facility on February 18, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to monitor residents' weight to detect significant weight loss or gain in order to ensure that the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status. The policy indicates if the resident exhibits a weight change of 5 lbs from the previous weight, the resident shall be re-weighed within 24 hours and the re-weighing shall be recorded. If the re-weight is validated as a 5% change, the registered dietician completes an assessment to investigate the cause of the weight change. The policy states the charge nurse will notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, information provided by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation to rule out abuse and implement corrective action for one of 6 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings included: A facility policy entitled Allegation, Suspicion, or Witnessed Abuse, Neglect, Misapplication, or Exploitation Intervention and Reporting, last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, indicated that staff will immediately report the incident to the Charge Nurse or immediate supervisor of the area. Upon receiving a report of abuse or alleged abuse, the Charge Nurse or supervisor or the area shall immediately notify the RN Supervisor, who will respond to the location, examine the resident, and begin the investigation. The following information should be included in the initial verbal and subsequent written report: name of the resident(s) involved, the date and time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to protect the personal privacy rights of three of 28 residents sampled (Resident A1, A2, and A3). Findings include: An observation of Resident A1's room on September 5, 2024, at 9:45 AM, revealed a sign was taped above the resident's bed indicating the resident was to have a Hoyer pad under her while in her wheelchair. An observation of Resident A2's room on September 5, 2024, at 9:49 AM, revealed a sign was taped above the resident's bed indicating the resident is to have nectar thicken liquids only. An observation of Resident A3's room on September 5, 2024, at approximately 9:55 AM revealed signs taped above the resident's bed indicating the resident was to have nectar thick fluids and no over the bed table. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on September 5, 2024, at approximately 5:15 PM revealed that the NHA was unable to provide information regarding the reason for these signs posted behind the residents' beds, that failed to assure the residents' personal privacy. 28 Pa. Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall and promote resident safety for two of 28 sampled (Resident's B1 and A 10). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident B1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction(stroke). A review of an admission minimum data set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 23, 2024 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, with a BIMS score ( Brief Interview for Mental Status. The BIMS test is used to get a quick snapshot of how well you are functioning cognitively at the moment.) of 15 ( a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognitively intact) and required staff assistance for transferring and toileting. A review of a facility investigation report dated September 1, 2024 at 8:00 PM revealed staff was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending July 23, 2024, the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee, observations and interviews it was determined the facility's procedures failed to effectively identify ongoing deficient practices related to personal privacy and infection control. Findings include: As a result of the deficiencies cited under the requirements related to personal privacy, accident hazards infection control, and facility staffing during the survey of September 5, 2024, the facility developed a plan of correction to serve as their allegation of compliance, which included a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This corrective plan was to be completed and functional by August 12, 2024. However, during the survey ending September 5, 2024, continuing deficient facility practice was identified with these same requirements. According to the facility's plan of correction for the deficiency cited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's infection control tracking log and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility and failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the spread of infections regarding foley catheter maintance for 1 of 28 sampled residents. (Resident 7). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Infection Control Policies and Practices (not dated), conducted during the survey ending September 5, 2024, revealed the facility's infection control policies are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe sanitary comfortable environment and help prevent and manage transmission of disease and infection. A review of the facility's infection control data provided during the survey of September 5, 2024, revealed the facility's infection control program failed to reflect an operational system to monitor and investigate causes of infection and the manner of spread. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff and residents it was determined the facility failed to efficiently deploy sufficient nursing staff to provide timely and quality care to each resident including one residents out of 28 sampled (Resident B1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident B1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction(stroke). A review of an admission minimum data set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated August 23, 2024 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, with a BIMS score of 15 ( Brief Interview for Mental Status. The BIMS test is used to get a quick snapshot of how well you are functioning cognitively at the moment a score of 13 to 15 indicates cognitively intact) and required staff assistance for transferring and toileting. A review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards on one of two floors (second floor). Findings include: Observation on July 23, 2024 from 9:00 AM through 2:30 PM the following: On the second floor unit residents were observed ambulating in the hallways and and self-propelling in wheelchairs. At this time two air purifier units were plugged into wall outlets on each side of the hallway near resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 13. The units were not secured, and moveable and obstructed continued access to the handrails on that side of the corridor and also not secured in any manner to prevent tipping. The cords and plugs created a potential tripping hazard. A plastic container with three drawers was observed in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER], which contained rubber gloves, protective gowns and masks, obstructing access to the handrail An air purifier unit was observed plugged into the wall outlet in the 200 hallway near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's infection control tracking log and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Infection Control Policies and Practices (not dated), conducted during the survey ending July 23, 2024, revealed that the facility's infection control policies are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe sanitary comfortable environment and help prevent and manage transmission of disease and infections. A review of the facility's infection control data provided during the survey of July 23, 2024, revealed that the facility's infection control program failed to reflect an operational system to monitor and investigate causes of infection and manner of spread. There was no evidence of a functional system, which enabled the facility to analyze clusters, changes in prevalent organisms, or increases in the rate of infection in a timely manner. A review of facility monthly infection control logs for June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the personal privacy rights of one of six residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: During an observation of Resident 1's room on July 23, 2024 at approximately 10:15 AM a hand written sign was observed taped to the back of the resident's bed which read R Limb alert (RUE) NO IV, lab draws, BPs or tight clothing. Interview with Resident 1 and her daughter on July 23, 2024, at 10:20 AM revealed that they did not know why that sign was posted behind the resident's bed. They stated they did not put the sign there, the facility did. When asked Resident 1 stated there was no reason that they could not use her right arm. She stated no one ever mentioned to her that her right arm should not be used. Resident 1 then asked if the sign could be removed from the wall behind her bed. A review of the resident's clinical record indicated her right arm should not be used for blood draws, but did not identify the clinical reason or diagnosis. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan included the care the resident required to attain the resident's highest practical physical well-being for one resident out of six reviewed (Resident 1). Findings including: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include a displaced fracture of the right lower leg (broken ankle) with history of falls. An interview and observation of Resident 1 at 10:00AM on July 23, 2024, revealed that the resident had a blue hard cast on her right leg, that extended from the base of her toes to just below her knee. A review of the resident's current plan of care initially, dated May 30, 2024, revealed that the presence of the cast or the need for assessment of her exposed toes to ensure that adequate color, circulation, sensation and mobility was present without swelling, was not included on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident 1) out of six residents reviewed by failing to assure prompt and necessary treatment for treatment for a resident's complaints of physical discomfort, painful urination, which delayed diagnosis and treatment of a salmonella infection. Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.292a. CRNP (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner) Practice (b)(1)(2) indicates (b) When acting in collaboration with a physician as set forth in a collaborative agreement and within the CRNP's specialty, a CRNP may: (1) Perform comprehensive assessments of patients and establish medical diagnoses. (2) Order, perform and supervise diagnostic tests for patients and, to the extent the interpretation of diagnostic tests is within the scope of the CRNP's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review clinical records and facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate that its quality assurance program fully investigated and analyzed causes of adverse events, a resident's diagnosed salmonella infection, to evaluate the adequacy of the facility's response to the foodborne illness and implement any applicable performance improvement activities. Findings included: Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a fractured ankle. An interview with Resident 1 on July 23, 2024, at 10:00 AM revealed she had concerns with food served at the facility. She stated the food the food served was extremely salty. She stated that she received food items that she disliked, including soft cooked eggs, egg whites, baloney sandwiches and a variety of other foods prepared by the facility that were not to her liking. She stated she also received greasy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and a review of facility training and orientation records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all employees received training on the facility's abuse prohibition policy and facility specific-procedures. Findings include: During an interview with the Nurse Educator on June 28, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., revealed that the facility utilizes an on-line education platform for staff to complete mandatory education and additional education topics were provided as needed on paper and offered a variety of educational methods present topics. The Nurse Educator provided the educational content on which staff received for their annual abuse prevention education program. The education failed to include the facility's specific procedures for identifying and reporting abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property or resident abuse prevention. During an interview on June 28, 2024, at 11:15 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that prior to survey that it was identified that the mandatory annual abuse training and new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and staff interviews, it was revealed that the facility failed to promptly report instances of resident abuse to the State Survey Agency, and submit completed abuse investigations to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident, for three out of four allegations of abuse reviewed. Findings include: A review of a policy entitled Abuse Prevention Program last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, indicated that the facility will report alleged and substantiated incidents to the Pennsylvania Department of Health, additional state agencies and/or local authorities per federal and state requirements. The facility will analyze the occurrences to determine what changes are needed, of any, to policies and procedures to prevent further occurrences. Any report or allegations of abuse/neglect, misappropriation, or exploitation will be reported initially by the Administrator (NHA), Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy and information provided by the facility it was determined the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation into instances of sexual abuse, protect other female residents from the potential for further abuse during the investigation and submit the completed investigation to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident as evidenced by one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 8) and failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin, ankle fracture, to rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment as the potential cause for one out of 21 sampled residents (Residents 48). Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy that was last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to a resident and the resident's representative upon the resident's transfer to the hospital for six residents out of the 21 sampled (Residents 2, 7, 24, 53, 72, and 188). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 required transfer to the hospital on January 13, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed no documentation that Resident 2 or Resident 2's representative were made aware of a facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer to the hospital. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 53 required transfer to the hospital on May 5, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed no documentation that Resident 53 or Resident 53's representative were made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to fully assess and implement individualized measures planned for the toileting needs of three residents out of 5 sampled for a decline in continence (Residents 51,15, and 2). Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Bladder and Bowel Screening and Assessment that was last reviewed by the facility May 10, 2024, indicated that a resident's bladder and bowel status will be evaluated and assessed at the time of admission/readmission and as needed with a change in bladder and bowel status. A plan of care is initiated based on the findings of the evaluation/assessment and/or voiding pattern diaries. The procedure included a minimum of three consecutive days (if appropriate), to identify the type of bladder/bowel incontinence and develop a bowel/bladder program as indicated. Upon completion of a bladder and bowel diary, the findings will be reviewed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently and accurately monitor resident weights to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters for three residents out of 21 sampled (Residents 21, 7, and 53). Findings included: A review of facility policy titled Weighing of Residents, last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, revealed the facility must monitor the resident's weight to detect significant weight loss or gain in order to ensure that the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, taking into account the resident's clinical condition or other appropriate intervention when there is a nutritional problem. The policy indicates that if the resident exhibits a weight change of 5 pounds from the previous weight, the resident shall be re-weighed within 24 hours, and the re-weight shall be recorded. Furthermore, the policy indicates that if the weight change falls into the significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized pain management program, consistent with professional standards of practice, to meet the pain management needs of one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Interagency Task Force, Executive Summary Report dated May 2021, for Pain Management Best Practices the development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis with measurable outcomes that focus on improvements including quality of life (QOL), improved functionality, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Achieving excellence in acute and chronic pain care depends on the following: · An emphasis on an individualized patient-centered approach for diagnosis and treatment of pain is essential to establishing a therapeutic alliance between patient and clinician. · Acute pain can be caused by a variety of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0713 — patternProvide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of consistent and timely physician services for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 48). Findings include: A review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and damage to the body's joints and other tissues), Alzheimer's disease, age-related osteoporosis (a bone disease that causes bones to become fragile due to a decrease in bone mass and density). A nurse's note dated February 17, 2024, at 2:07 PM indicated that the resident's family approached the nurse, concerned over swelling of the resident's left leg and requested results of the x-ray that was performed on February 5, 2024. According to the note, a call was placed to the physician, and message left. Nurse's note dated February 18, 2024, at 1 PM indicated that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policies and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide timely and quality care to each resident including three residents out of 21 sampled (Resident 7, 21, 80). Findings included: A review of facility policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, reviewed last by the facility on May 10, 2024, revealed that during medication administration, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to, the following: administer medications within timeframes specified by facility policy or manufacturer's information. A clinical record review revealed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include atrial fibrillation (a condition that causes the heart to beat irregularly and sometimes much faster than normal), cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff, involved in the direct care of residents, who possess the appropriate skills and competencies to promptly identify and address an escalation in inappropriate sexual behaviors displayed by one resident (Resident 8) out of 21 sampled to maintain the safety and well-being of other residents. Findings included: A review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia and adjustment disorder (difficulty in managing stressful life changes such as coping with work-related problems, loss of loved ones, or relationship issues that leads to significant impairment in functioning) with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. The resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 8's plan of care dated June 25, 2023, and revised on March 26, 2024, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's assessment, select facility policies and procedures, and resident clinical records, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to document a facility-wide assessment to identify the resources needed to meet the residents, including sufficient staff with the necessary skills and competencies to provide the needed care and services for residents with behavioral health care and dementia care needs. Findings include: The facility assessment, dated Quarter 1 2024, and reviewed during the survey ending June 28, 2024, revealed the facility's census and acuity and general information regarding the facility's religious denominations, recreation, social services and physical, occupational and speech therapy services. The facility assessment did not include evidence of an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical, functional or cognitive status, of the residents that may affect and plan for the services the facility must provide for residents with behavioral health care and dementia care needs. The facility assessment failed to include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility QAPI meeting attendance records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the required committee members met at least quarterly for one quarter out of three reviewed. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on June 28, 2024, at approximately 12:30 p.m., revealed that facility's QA/QAPI committee members included the Administrator (NHA), Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director, and department heads. The NHA reported that the committee should meet at least quarterly. Review of the facility's QA/QAPI committee attendance sheets for the QA meetings held since the last annual survey ending July 23, 2023, through annual survey ending June 28, 2024, revealed that the QA/QAPI committee only held one quarterly meeting that was conducted on April 30, 2024. Interview with the NHA, at approximately 12:33 p.m., reported that she was unable to locate the QA/QAPI signature sheets to show documented evidence that the facility's QA/QAPI committee met at least quarterly. 28 Pa. Code 201.18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 12). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual regarding Section N0410 for Medications Received, the facility would record the number of days a medication was received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look back period. A review of Resident 12's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section N 410 indicated that the resident received an anticoagulant medication 7 days in the 7 day look back period. A review of the Resident 12's physician orders revealed that the resident did not have a physician order for an anticoagulant medication during the 7 day look back period. Review of the resident's May 2024 and June 2024 Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards on one of three resident care units (300 Hall). Findings include: Observations made during medication administration on June 28, 2024, at approximately 8:30 AM revealed an unattended, and unlocked, medication cart in the hallway of the resident unit. During observation of resident medication administration with Employee 10, licensed practical nurse, the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended when Employee 10 took medications into a resident room to administer to resident. The cart was left against the wall across from where the resident's room was located and out of the nurse's view. Further observation of the medication cart revealed that the keys to the cart, which allow access to both the medication cart and narcotic drawer within, were left unattended on top of the cart. Multiple residents were observed ambulating/self-propelling out in the hallway at the time of this observation. During an interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely provide dental services required by one Medicaid Payor source resident out of the 21 sampled residents (Resident 7). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include atrial fibrillation (a condition that causes the heart to beat irregularly and sometimes much faster than normal), cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump blood to the rest of the body), and heart failure (a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated May 23, 2024 revealed that Resident 7 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of facility's planned meal tickets, a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident's food allergies and provide weight loss interventions for one resident, Resident 53, out of 21 residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Supplements that was last reviewed on May 10, 2024, revealed that if maintenance of acceptable nutritional status is difficult through delivery/intake of regular meals, the facility will consider and provide the resident with additional nourishment through between-meal or dietary supplements. A nutritional assessment will be completed to determine the need and appropriateness of dietary supplement use and a physicians' order for a dietary supplement will be obtained and maintained in the medical record. Dining services will provide supplements as ordered and nursing will document the acceptance of supplements in the electronic ADL (activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during administration of resident medication by one nurse out of two observed administering medications (Employee 10). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last reviewed by the facility on May 10, 2024, indicated that appropriate hand hygiene should be performed before and after direct resident contact. Medications should not come in contact with any surface except for the medication cup. Facility staff should avoid touching the medication with bare hands when opening a bottle or unit dose package. During an observation of medication administration on June 28, 2024, at approximately 8:15 AM., with Employee 10, licensed practical nurse, Employee 10 was observed preparing medications for administration to a resident. Employee 10 was observed handling each medication, nine in total,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and the facility's infection assessment tool, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement its antibiotic stewardship protocols for initiating antibiotic use for two residents out of 21 sampled. (Resident 2 and Resident 188) Findings included: Review of a facility policy entitled Antibiotic Stewardship last reviewed May 10. 2024, indicated it was the policy of the facility to provide optimal use of antibiotics based on clinical guidelines and avoided unnecessary adverse events related to the use of medications. Goals of the program were to provide a clearly defined empiric therapy for treatment of suspected infections when appropriate, promote safe and effective use of antibiotics that will adequately treat the patient for susceptible bacterial infections, and to change broad spectrum antibiotics to promote narrowed therapy to minimize bacterial resistance in the facility and community. The facility will utilize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify a resident's responsible representative of injuries sustained by one resident out of eight sampled (Resident A1). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. A review of Resident A1's clinical record revealed that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and fall reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement planned fall prevention interventions for a resident identified a high risk for falls for one resident out of eight sampled (Resident B1). Findings included: A review of Resident B1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis [a breakdown of skeletal muscle due to direct or indirect muscle injury and left untreated can result in kidney damage], history of falling, and Alzheimer's disease [is a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior. This is a gradually progressive condition]. A review of the resident's initial fall risk evaluation dated May 1, 2024, at 9:30 p.m., identified that the resident was a high fall risk related to falling 1-2 times over the last six-months, and never oriented to person, place, time, or situation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure timely and completely documented clinical records, according to professional standards, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident A1). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. A review of Resident A1's clinical record revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess and evaluate bowel and bladder function and implement individualized approaches to restore normal bowel and bladder function to the extent possible for three out of six sampled residents (Resident CR1, 2, and 3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Bowel and Bladder Retraining and Scheduled Toileting Program dated as reviewed by the facility on May 26, 2023, revealed indicated that at the time of admission, all resident's evaluation status would be assessed to identify potential risk factors and initial potential for bladder re-training or scheduled toileting. Within 24-hours of admission, a voiding pattern will be initiated, and a preliminary care plan will be initiated based on the initial assessment. The goal is to collect data to assist in determining resident's potential for re-training, or to establish a toileting regimen. The Voiding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely consult with the physician regarding a significant change in mental status and behavioral symptoms displayed by one resident out of six sampled (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Change is Resident Condition/Notification revealed the facility must evaluate each resident's change in condition and notify the attending physician. Further it was indicated the physician will be notified of an abrupt onset of agitation or behavioral disturbance change from the resident's usual behaviors. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, retention of urine, and cerebral infarction (stroke). A review of a nursing note dated for November 17, 2023, at 10:10 AM revealed the resident the resident was alert, awake, and making his needs known. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and identifiable clinical records for one of six sampled residents (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, retention of urine, and cerebral infarction (stroke). A review conducted on December 5, 2023, of an admission physician progress note dated November 18, 2023, revealed that the physician's documentation was illegible. The documentation could not be read or understood by facility staff and the results of the physician's assessment of the resident could not be determined that nor any directions or recommendations that the physician may have given for the resident's care upon admission. During an interview with the DON (director of nursing) on December 5, 2023, at 10:20 AM the DON attempted to read the physician's progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-21 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility-initiated transfer notices, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer in writing and in a language and manner they understand and to provide copies of written notice of facility-initiated hospital transfers of residents to a representative of the Office of the State Ombudsman for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 72). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed Resident 72 was transferred to a community hospital on December 29, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility was unable to provide documented evidence the resident and resident representative were notified of the reasons for the transfer in writing or provide documented evidence the facility sent copies of written notices of these transfers to the representative of the Office of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to correctly post nurse staffing information. Findings include: Observation upon entrance to the facility on September 5, 2024 at 9:00 AM and 11:56 AM. revealed the posted nursing time was dated September 5, 2024. The form displayed the resident census however, it did not include the staffing for the day that reflected the number of staff and hours worked by the nursing staff. During an interview September 5, 2024 at approximately 1:00 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the posted nursing time was not posted at the beginning of the shift. The facility failed to list the total number of staff and actual hours worked by the staff. 28 Pa.Code 201.18 (b)(3) 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d) Nursing Services
- No harm found · C2024-06-28 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility-initiated transfer notices and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notices of facility-initiated hospital transfers to the resident and their representative and failed to provide a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for six residents out of the 21 sampled (Resident 2, 7, 24, 53, 72, and 188). Findings include: Regulatory requirements indicate that before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital on January 13, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record failed to find documented evidence that the facility provided the resident and resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-01-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to afford residents the resident to choose daily activities, including sleeping and waking times, as evidenced by three out of 12 residents sampled (Residents 2, 5, and 12). Findings include: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). An annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required the assistance of staff with activities of daily living including ambulation and transfers. A review of Resident 2's current care plan, last revised [DATE], indicated that the resident's preferred time for waking for the day would be between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM. A review of Resident 5's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$113,348 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $113,348 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-15 for 56 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENNSYLVANIA LTC INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/06/1990 |
| ROWE, WILLIAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/02/2011 |
| DELOZIER, ARTHUR | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/12/2013 |
| DUGGAN, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2010 |
| WALDROP, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2018 |
| THE GUARDIAN FOUNDATION INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/06/1990 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $74K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.