Marywood Heights

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 70.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing care with the required assistance of two staff members and the use of a mechanical lift as planned to ensure safety and prevent major injuries. As a result, the resident sustained a fracture of the clavicle and a fracture of the first rib, representing actual harm for one resident (Resident 65) out of 20 residents sampled.Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Investigation of Allegations of any Abuse Type last reviewed by the facility on January 3, 2026, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect. The policy defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select investigation reports and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision, and implement effective individualized safety measures for a resident with known unsafe behaviors to prevent multiple falls for one resident (Resident 13) and a serious burn, to one resident (Resident 27) out of 19 residents sampled. Findings include: A review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility April 14, 2023, with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting left dominant side. (Hemiparesis, also called unilateral paresis, is the weakness of one entire side of the body. Hemiplegia, in its most severe form, is the complete paralysis of one entire side of the body). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select investigative reports and clinical records, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility neglected to provide the care and services necessary to avoid physical harm and maintain physical health for one resident out of five residents sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy, last revised January 2023, revealed that the facility will provide each resident with the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological services to meet their individual needs and to promote or maintain the resident at their highest level of well-being. This includes the protection of Resident's Rights. Each resident has the right to privacy, dignity and confidentiality for all aspects of care and services. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], 2022, with diagnoses, which included dementia, muscle weakness and the need for assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antibiotic medications for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 50). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed January 3, 2026, revealed appropriate indications for antibiotic use include meeting minimum clinical criteria for active infection utilizing McGeer Criteria (standardized clinical criteria used in long-term care to determine whether sufficient signs and symptoms are present to support diagnosis of infection and initiation of antibiotic therapy). A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (decline in memory and thinking ability affecting daily functioning), urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder), history of cystitis (inflammation of the bladder), and presence of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Council meeting minutes, grievance documentation provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make reasonable efforts to address concerns raised by the Resident Council and failed to keep residents informed regarding the status and outcome of identified concerns. The facility did not ensure ongoing communication or timely follow-up regarding issues presented by five of five residents attending a Resident Council group meeting (Residents 31, 48, 30, 38, and 35).Findings include: A review of the facility's Grievance Policy last reviewed on January 5, 2026, indicated the residents', families, and their representatives have the right to voice grievances concerning care and treatment, behavior of staff or other residents or any concerns regarding their stay. Further stating the grievance official will follow up on all concerns and grievances registered by any resident or resident representative. A review of the Minutes from a Resident Council meeting dated December 29, 2025, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, pharmacy recommendations, behavior monitoring documentation, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 36) was free from the use of a chemical restraint Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication(s) last reviewed by the facility on January 3, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions (approaches that do not involve medication, such as environmental modification, reassurance, or behavioral techniques) are clinically contraindicated. The policy defined a psychotropic medication as a drug that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. The policy indicated that use of psychotropic medications without documentation demonstrating that other treatments were clinically contraindicated is considered inadequate justification for use. The policy revealed the indications for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered comprehensive care plan that addressed ongoing behavioral concerns and identified interventions to manage accusatory behaviors for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 57).Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include generalized anxiety (a common, mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent worry and fear that disrupts daily life) and depression (common mental illness characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and reduced energy, affecting how a person feels, thinks, and acts). A review of Resident 57's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 9, 2026 revealed that Resident 57 was moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for a bowel protocol for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine), the primary goal of constipation management (treatment of difficulty passing stool or infrequent bowel movements) is improvement of symptoms, with the passage of soft, formed stool without straining generally occurring at least three times per week. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 8 had physician orders dated July 19, 2024, for a bowel regimen (a step-by-step treatment plan used to prevent or relieve constipation) which included: Milk of Magnesia (magnesium hydroxide, a medication used to relieve constipation by drawing water into the bowel) suspension 400 mg/5 ml; administer 30 milliliters by mouth as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to maintain accurate records of controlled drugs and ensure accurate documentation of drug administration for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 34).Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances, (medications regulated by federal law due to their potential for misuse or dependence and require accurate tracking from receipt through administration and disposition) last reviewed March 13, 2025, revealed the facility maintains a Master Controlled Substance Log, which includes individual medication sign-off sheets for each controlled medication and a shift-to-shift count reconciliation sheet located on each medication cart. The policy indicated staff are responsible for accurately documenting each dose removed and administered to ensure accountability and safe medication practices. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 34 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on select facility policy, a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses timely administered residents' medications for 2 of 18 residents reviewed. (Resident 9 and 41). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse (RN) was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of controlled drug shift count records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate controlled medication records on two of two medication carts observed. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Marywood Heights Count Records last reviewed January 2, 2025, revealed controlled drugs are inventoried and documented under proper conditions in regard to security and state/federal regulations. Further the policy indicated Scheduled II medications are counted by the oncoming nurse and outgoing nurse at the change of each shift and documented on the individual shift count sheet for narcotics. A review of the facility Master Control Substance Log from the 215 to 271 nursing unit medication cart revealed the following: April 13, 2025, the day shift on coming nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count was completed and correct. April 13, 2025, the evening shift off going nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count was completed and correct. April 15, 2025, the night shift off going nurse failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage for medications on one of two nursing units observed. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Disposal of Medications and Medication Related Supplies, last reviewed by the facility in January 2, 2025, revealed that discontinued medications and mediations left in the facility after a resident's discharge, which do not qualify for return to the pharmacy for credit, are destroyed. Observation of the medication storage room on May 6,2025, at 8:44 AM revealed an unsecured, opened white paper bag located on the counter of the medication room. The bag contained the following: Two separate rolls of medication packets, one roll containing 46 packets of medications, the second roll contained 29 packets of medications. One box containing two tabletss of Cefdinir (antibiotic). A clear plastic envelope containing two capsules of tizanidine (a muscle relaxant). One clear plastic envelope containing two tablets of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, the minutes from facility Resident Council meetings, and grievances lodged with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to put forth sufficient efforts to promptly resolve continued resident complaints and grievances expressed during Resident Council meetings and verbal grievances, including those voiced by six of six residents attending a resident group meeting (Residents 16, 43, 62, 129, 32, and 71) and failed to keep the residents apprised of the status of the facility's decisions and efforts toward grievance resolution. Findings include: A review of the facility's Grievance Policy last revised in December 2019 indicated the residents', families, and their representatives have the right to voice grievances concerning care and treatment, behavior of staff or other residents or any concerns regarding their stay. Further stating the grievance official or designee will meet with the resident to formally review the resolution to the grievance. A review of the Minutes from Resident Council meetings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $32,646 — penalty dated 2024-07-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $318K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA