No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Masonic Village At Sewickley

1000 Masonic Drive, Sewickley, PA 15143 · Non profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (412) 741-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (412) 741-1400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1101 5th Ave · (412) 269-0899 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy2.1 mi
517 Beaver Street
Grocery
1017 4th Ave · (412) 264-6010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.6%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened34.7%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.4%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.7%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.201.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.871.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.7%CMS range 39.2–64.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.3–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.06
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.93
RN hoursweekends
29.9%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 71.0 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-18)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, investigation documents, and other resources, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to ensure that a resident was free from accident/hazards by failing to provide a second person to assist with a stand-up lift transfer, which resulted in harm as evidenced by a displaced fractured humerus (upper arm bone), hospitalization, and functional loss of right hand for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled Resident Transfers To/From and Within Equipment, last reviewed August 28, 2025, indicated employees will utilize appropriate body mechanics and safety techniques to prevent injury to the residents and themselves while transferring a resident to/from and with resident care equipment. The resident's current transfer status will be included in the individualized plan of care and noted within the nursing assistant documentation area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's water management plan, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement control measures in the cooling tower and closed loop systems as the water management plan indicated to prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria, and the facility failed to conduct remedial control measures timely and appropriately for eight of ten months (November 2025 to March 2026).Findings Include: Review of the facility's Water Management Plan dated 3/15/25, revealed for this water management plan to be most effective, it must be fully implemented. The persons responsible for verifying implementation of control measure are listed within each control measure. Cooling tower systems (CTs) present the potential for Legionella growth and exposure and are identified as a significant risk and control location. If Legionella is found positive in cooling towers immediate measures are taken to reduce risk and comply with laws. Then samples must be rested in 30-60 days. It was indicated retesting 3-7 days after hyperchlorination or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rights to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of residents' health, safety and welfare by making certain residents understand the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN) of non-coverage forms and failed to ensure the agreement is explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands for one of three residents (Resident R67).Findings include: Review of facility policy Informing the Resident of Medicare A/Skilled Managed Care Denial, dated 8/28/25, indicated the facility has established procedures to ensure that notices of Medicare non-coverage are issued timely and in adherence with the guidelines set forth by CMS. The resident's Medicare/Skilled Managed Care eligibility will be reviewed at the time of admission and as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, documentation provided by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement abuse prevention and investigation procedures for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R79) following an allegation of possible misappropriation of medication and medical neglect as defined as the facility policy. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 8/28/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility to assure residents the right to freedom from abuse. This is assured by implementing a system of prevention, screening, identification. When an allegation is made (detection), the facility will investigate, report, and respond immediately to the allegation. Willful, as used in the definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must of intended to inflict injury or harm. Medical neglect is defined as failure to provide care for existing medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, facility submitted documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of possible misappropriation of medication and medical abuse as defined by the facility policy for one of three sampled resident records (Resident R79).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 8/28/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility to assure residents the right to freedom from abuse. This is assured by implementing a system of prevention, screening, identification. When an allegation is made (detection), the facility will investigate, report, and respond immediately to the allegation. Willful, as used in the definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must of intended to inflict injury or harm. Medical neglect is defined as failure to provide care for existing medical problems such as not taking action on medical problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for one of three residents (Resident R79).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 8/28/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility to assure residents the right to freedom from abuse. Medical neglect is defined as failure to provide care for existing medical problems such as not taking action on medical problems, prescribed treatments or therapies, not calling a physician when necessary regarding change of status, failure to monitor for adverse drug reactions. The investigation will begin immediately by interviewing the resident who is suspected of being abused and any witnesses. All interviews are conducted in a private setting, free from intimidating factors. A review of the facility policy titled Occurrence Prevention, Documentation, and Reporting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documents, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of a resident with mental health needs for one of three residents (Resident R20) and with a pacemaker transmitter for one of four residents (Resident R23). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 8/28/25, indicated Each care plan includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Each residents comprehensive care plan describes: The services and care that are to be furnished to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Planning dated 8/28/25, indicated a comprehensive care plan will be developed and implemented by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician order for bowel protocol for two of six residents (Resident R39, R75). Findings include: Review of facility policy Bowel Protocol dated 8/28/25, indicated resident's bowel movements are documented by clinical team members in the point-of-care system within the resident's electronic health record. For independently toileted cognitively impaired residents the nurse aide should document no bowel movement if it is not visualized by a staff member during a shift. The LPN/RN should initiate the bowel protocol if ordered for the specific resident. Document the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of treatment. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, anemia and diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident R39's a MDS annual assessment (minimum data assessment)- periodic assessment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to meet residents pain needs for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Pain Assessment Management Record Procedure dated 8/28/25, indicated the facility is committed to the promotion of the resident comfort through the assessment and effective management of resident pain. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of multiple rib fractures, pneumonia and pain. Review of Resident R1's care plan dated 5/26/26, revealed the resident was experience pain or the resident was at risk for pain and discomfort. Interventions included to administer pain medications as ordered, observe for side effects and effectiveness. Complete pain assessment, and observe for pain each shift. Review of Resident R1's physician order dated 5/23/26, indicated to administer Tramadol HCl Tablet 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person - centered care plan to address dementia for a resident with a diagnosis of dementia for one of three residents (Resident R20).Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans dated 8/28/25, indicated Each care plan includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Each residents comprehensive care plan describes: The services and care that are to be furnished to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R20's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], (MDS - a periodic assessment of resident needs) indicated diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (movement disorder of the nervous system that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in one of two medication storage rooms (Redwood Medication Room).Findings: Review of facility Storage of Medications policy dated [DATE], indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly. During a medication storage room review on [DATE], at 10:35 a.m. the following supplies were observed and expired: (1) Universal Catheter Tray - expired [DATE](1) IV Start Kit - expired [DATE] During an interview on [DATE], at 10:44 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed the above expired supplies and that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in one of two medication storage rooms (Redwood Medication Room). 28 Pa Code: 211.9 (a)(1) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa code: 211.12 (d) (1) (5) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of two residents (Resident R44). Findings include: During a review of the facility policy End of Life Care dated 8/28/26, indicated that end-of-life care is approached in a comprehensive way with respect and dignity for the residents and their loved ones. The interdisciplinary delivery of services provided by a hospice organization. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R44's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), and arthritis. Review of physician order dated 3/13/26, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Infection Control training to one of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E19). Findings include: Review of the facility Nursing Assistant - HC Position Description indicated the position will perform various resident care activities and related non-professional nursing services while ensuring the care of our residents is provided in a safe, caring, timely, and appropriate manner by maintaining the appropriate competencies and skills through continued education that encompasses all of these areas. Essential Functions/Professional competencies: maintain compliance with yearly education requirements according to facility policies and DOH (Department of Health) regulations. Maintains competencies and skills through continued education, including in-service education, programs, floor conferences and nursing staff meetings. During an interview on 6/18/26, at 10:10 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that education is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff received a minimum of twelve hours of in-service education training each year for one out of two Nurse Aide (NA) Employees (Employee E19).Findings include: Review of the facility Nursing Assistant - HC Position Description indicated the position will perform various resident care activities and related non-professional nursing services while ensuring the care of our residents is provided in a safe, caring, timely, and appropriate manner by maintaining the appropriate competencies and skills through continued education that encompasses all of these areas. Essential Functions/Professional competencies: maintain compliance with yearly education requirements according to facility policies and DOH (Department of Health) regulations. Maintains competencies and skills through continued education, including in-service education , programs, floor conferences and nursing staff meetings. During an interview on 6/18/26, at 10:30 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility polices, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter as required for three of four residents (Resident R11, R17, and R41). Findings include: Review of facility policy Continence Care Program and Indwelling Catheter Management dated 8/8/24/25, indicated drainage bags should be covered for dignity. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R11's minimum data set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/30/25, indicated the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure) obstructive uropathy (blockage of urinary flow) and Parkinson's disease (brain condition that causes slowed movements, rigidity and tremors). Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R11 had a physician's order dated 4/25/25, for an indwelling urinary catheter (closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical supplies in two of three medication rooms (Maple Place and [NAME] Court), and on two of three medication carts (Birch Place and [NAME] Court).Findings: Review of facility “Storage of Medications” policy dated [DATE], indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufactures recommendations or those of pharmacy. Insulin pens should be dated when fires opened. A pharmacy consultant or facility designee will monitor medication storage, medication records, and expiration dates. During a medication storage room review on [DATE], at 11:15 a.m. the following were observed: - A vial of tuberculin (medication used to detect a respiratory disease) was dated [DATE] and was expired in Maple Place medication storage room. During a medication cart review on [DATE], at 11:25 a.m. the following were observed: - Novolog Insulin Pen (used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine it was safe to self-administer medications for one of three residents (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Self -Administration of Medications last reviewed 8/8/24, indicated residents will be permitted to self-administer medication after evaluation by their interdisciplinary team and approval from their medical provider. If the interdisciplinary team indicates that a resident is able to safely self-administer medications the provider will write an order authorizing the resident to self-administer the medication. Review of Resident R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/14/25, indicated reentry to facility on 10/30/24, with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (high sugar in the blood) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- causes breathing problems). During a medication pass observation completed on 7/29/25, at 9:24 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility documents, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form were provided in a timely manner for two of three residents (Resident R32 and CR Resident R333). Findings include: Review of facility policy Informing the Resident of Medicare A/Skilled Managed Care Denial dated 8/8/24, indicated the policy is to protect the rights of each resident, it is required by a facility to provide beneficiaries advanced notice that care and services will not be or will no longer by covered by their Medicare Part A or Managed Skilled Care benefit. The facility has established this policy and the associated procedure to ensure that notices of Medicare non-coverage are issued timely and in adherence with the guidelines. Review of Resident R32's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of five resident hospital transfers (Residents R4, and R8).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bed Hold, Transfer, Discharge and readmission Policy for Nursing Care dated 8/8/24, indicated appropriate information will be communicated to the receiving health care provider/facility that will be caring for the resident. The information should include but is not limited to: 1. Contact information of the provider responsible for the care of the resident 2. Resident representative/POA (power of attorney) Contact information 3. Copy of Advanced Directive 4. All special instructions/precautions for ongoing care 5. Comprehensive care plan goals/discharge care instructions 6. Any other information that will ensure a safe and effective transition of care including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for two of five residents (Resident R18 and R19), and failed to follow the bowel protocol in a timely fashion for one of five residents (Resident R17).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bowel Protocol dated 8/8/24, indicated treatment after 72 hours with no documented bowel movement:- the evening shift nurse should examine abdomen. If there are abnormal findings, give Senna (laxative) and notify the provider for further orders.-the day shift nurse the following day will determine and evaluate effectiveness of the Senna by reviewing documentation in the clinical record. For residents with no bowel movement (BM) the day nurse will perform an additional exam, notify the provider for further orders and give a Dulcolax suppository and document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR).-If the protocol is ineffective, this should be noted in the resident's medical record and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two of three residents (Resident R17 and R77).Findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing on 7/31/25, at 11:00 a.m. indicated the facility did not have a policy for assistive devices/splints. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/14/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and Alzheimer’s Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of Resident R17's progress note dated 7/15/2025, 8:59 p.m. indicated resident returned from the Orthopedic appointment with a back brace that is to be removed at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two residents (Resident R77).Findings include: Review of the facility policy PICC and Midline Management and Protocol last reviewed 8/8/24, indicated with intermittent infusions (antibiotics) are flushed with 10 millimeter (ml) normal saline solution (NSS) then infuse medication. After medication is infused, flush with 10 ml NSS. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of vertebra, thoracic region (back), depression and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of physician orders dated 7/26/25, indicated Cefepime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for two of six residents (Resident R17 and R35).Findings include:Review of facility policy Oxygen Concentrator/Oxygen Tank dated 8/8/24, indicated to change the bottle and tubing weekly when oxygen concentrators are in use.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/14/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions).Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R17 had a physician's order dated 7/14/25, for oxygen via nasal cannula (a thin flexible tube that goes around your head and into your nostrils to provide supplemental oxygen) at 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. The decision is final, can be enforced by a court, and can only be appealed on very narrow grounds) for one of three residents (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the admission record indicated Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for one of four quarterly meetings (Quarter One of 2025). Findings Include: The facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy dated 8/8/24, indicated it is the policy of the facility to develop a QAPI plan in accordance with Federal Guidelines to describe how the facility will address clinical care, resident quality of life and residents' choice and is based on the scope and complexity of services defined by the Facility Assessment. Review of Quality assurance and Performance Improvement sign in sheets and attendance records for Quarter One of 2025, failed to reveal the Director of Nursing was in attendance. During an interview on 7/28/25, at 2:35 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during a medication pass for one of three residents (Resident R6), failed to prevent cross contamination and follow enhanced barrier precaution during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R7) and failed to properly monitor residents in room personal refrigerator temperatures for four of five residents (Resident R1, R34, R35, and R67) which created the potential for food borne illness.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Infection Transmission Prevention and Interventions last reviewed 8/8/24, indicated enhanced barrier precautions are uses for residents that have a wound or wounds which require a dressing for treatment. Review of facility policy Refrigerator and Freezer Temperatures last reviewed 8/8/24, indicated all resident and medication refrigerators are monitored using an electronic monitoring system. Staff will notify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, in-service documentation, personnel records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective annual in-service training program for four of of eight personnel records (Nurse Aide Employee E3, Nurse Aide Employee E4, Nurse Aide Employee E5, and Nurse Aide Employee E6). Findings include: The facility Employee Compliance Education procedure policy dated 8/21/23, indicated that it is the policy of the facility to provide employees with compliance education and training. Education and issues on specific issues will be provided to staff members. The facility Employee policy handbook dated 12/2023, indicated in order to remain at the highest level of skill and training, employees are requested and may be required to attend or complete the periodic in-service training programs. Review of the facility Annual In-Service course listing dated 2024, included the following courses: Abuse Prevention, Reporting, and Resident Rights Active Shooter: Emergency Preparedness Communicating with Older Adults…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility provided documents, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged allegation of abuse for one of two residents (Resident R31). Findings include: Review of the policy Abuse Prevention dated 8/21/23, indicated it is the facility's policy to assure residents the right to freedom from abuse. This is assured by implementing a system of prevention, screening, identification, and training. When an allegation is made, the facility will investigate, report, and respond appropriately to the allegation. Review of admission record indicated that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/11/24, indicated the diagnoses of renal insufficiency (condition where the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), high blood pressure, and heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate alleged allegation of abuse for one of two residents (Resident R31). Findings include: Review of the policy Abuse Prevention dated 8/21/23, indicated it is the facility's policy to assure residents the right to freedom from abuse. This is assured by implementing a system of prevention, screening, identification, and training. When an allegation is made, the facility will investigate, report, and respond appropriately to the allegation. Review of admission record indicated that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/11/24, indicated the diagnoses of renal insufficiency (condition where the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), high blood pressure, and heart failure (the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exited to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) for one of two resident (Residents R17). Findings include: Review of the admission Record indicated Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/6/24, indicated the diagnoses of Dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), chronic kidney disease and venous insufficiency (leg veins don't allow blood to flow back up to your heart). Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Question C0100 indicated a BIMS score of 1- severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of three residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of federal guidance §483.25(i) Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning. The facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences. Review of facility policies failed to reveal a policy for oxygen therapy. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/17/24, indicated diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior. This is a gradual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LEJA, TRACYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/06/2024
ODONNELL, CHRISIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/06/2024
SPENCE, BRENDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2018
BAHNEY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/03/2024
BAKER, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
BRINK, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/30/2019
CEPIELIK, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
DERR, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
HAINES, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
HEESE, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2017
JEFFREYS, KIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
MILLER, GLENNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
ROUP, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/28/2021
SNYDER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
WHEELER, FREDERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/21/2018
FORMICA, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2018
KINGSBURY, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 1%Other / private 80%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$740per resident / day
operating cost
$22,506per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$212per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395638. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next