No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Silver Stream Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

905 Penllyn Pike, Spring House, PA 19477 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (215) 646-1500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
832 N Bethlehem Pike · (484) 325-5753 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1111 N Bethlehem Pike · (215) 646-6300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
712 Penllyn Pike · (215) 643-4977

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.5%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine17.9%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.171.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.791.181.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.6%CMS range 24.4–51.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.7–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
58.0%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-23)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed related to neglect allegations for two out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R2 and Resident R3).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention Policy, revised February 1, 2026 , revealed to ensure all residents are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and exploitation including staff to resident, resident to resident, visitor to resident, contractor to resident, and any other form of abuse- in accordance with federal and state long term care regulations. This facility maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward abuse of any kind. This includes abuse committed by staff, volunteers, contractors, consultants, agency personnel, visitors, or other residents. All residents have the right to live in a safe environment free from physical, emotional, sexual, financial, or verbal abuse. All allegations, suspicions, or observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment on 1 of the 2 Nursing Units observed (2nd floor Nursing Unit).Findings include:A tour of the facility was conducted on June 2, 2026, at 11:30 a.m., with the Maintenance Director, Employee E3, who confirmed the following observations:In room [ROOM NUMBER] was an air conditioner plugged into an outlet with no face plate around outlet and wires exposed. The phone jack removed from wall and wire hanging out of wall.In room [ROOM NUMBER] there was an outlet removed from the wall, with wires and whole outlet dangling out of the wall and an additional hole in wall.28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1)Management28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(3)Management

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management services for one of two residents reviewed for pain management (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of encephalopathy (altered mental state or confusion caused by a medical condition affecting brain function) , schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder that includes symptoms of both schizophrenia and a mood disorder), and type 2 diabetes mellites (chronic disease in which the body does not use insulin properly and/or does not make enough insulin, causing blood sugar (glucose) levels to become too high).Review of hospital discharge documentation, dated May 22, 2026, revealed Resident R1 returned to the facility following a hysterectomy with physician orders for Tramadol 50 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate pain (pain score 4-6).Review of Resident R1's clinical record, physician orders, and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the Tramadol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a complete and through investigation for an allegation of abuse for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility abuse policy, Abuse Investigating and Reporting, with a revision date of 2016 stated that if an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual, and ensure any further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment is prevented. Review of the April 2026 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of dysphasia (difficulty swallowing); aphasia (a language disorder that affects an individual's ability to communicate effectively); dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities, and cerebral infarction (a stroke). Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1 resident (Resident R2) with an allegation of inappropriately touching a cognitively impaired resident (Resident R1) was properly supervised for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed.Findings include:Findings include: Review of the facility abuse policy, Abuse Investigating and Reporting, with a revision date of 2016 stated that if an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will assign the investigation to an appropriate individual, and ensure any further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment is prevented. Review of the April 2026 physician orders for Resident R1 included the diagnoses of dysphasia (difficulty swallowing); aphasia (a language disorder that affects an individual's ability to communicate effectively); dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the resident was provided needed care and services related to turning and repositioning for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of Resident R2's medical records revealed that she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including, but not limited to paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury or disease) requiring total care. Further review revealed a January 6, 2026, physician's order to turn and re-position the resident every two hours every shift. A review of Resident R2's Treatment Administration Record for March 2026, reveled one box for the nurse to check off for turning and repositioning for each eight-hour shift. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 25, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. confirmed that the order was not input into the software program to allow for every two hour checks, and that there was no place for the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were available and operable for resident use for one of nine residents interviewed. (Residents R7) Findings include: Interview with Resident R7 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Bed C, conducted on March 25, 2026, at 11:35 a.m. revealed that the resident's call bell did not work. After pushing the red button, the red light at the panel that the cord was plugged into did not light. The whit light in the hall above the door frame also did not light. Interview on March 25, 2026, at 11:40 a.m. with licensed nurse, Employee E6 confirmed that the call light was not working and that she would follow up with maintenance to get the call bell fixed. Interview with Employee E4, the Assistant Maintenance Manager, on March 25, 2026, at 12:15 p.m. revealed that he had repaired the call bell. When the call bell was tested at 12:20 p.m. it was still not working. Employee E4 again said that he had just had the call bell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, comfortable and homelike condition for three of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R55, R56). Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the facility on January 20, 2026, revealed the following concerns: Observations on January 20, 2026, at 11:45 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed Resident R1 in the bed near the door who had her winter coat on and was under the blankets on her bed. It was very cold in the room. When asked about the temperature in the room, the resident said she was cold and while she liked the room cool, it was way too cold. It was dark in the room and when the PTAC heating unit was looked at there was light from outside shining through a gap in the wall between the heating unit and the wall and the 20 degree wind from outside was blowing through the crack into the room. Observation of the newly admitted resident in the bed near the heating unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete and through investigation was completed to rule out neglect for 1 out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R8).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prevention Policy, with an effective date of April 1, 2025 indicated that in reference to responding and investigating abuse, immediate protective measures are taken, which included ensuring immediate protective measure are taken which may include separating residents involved in the incident; staff documenting the incident factually and notifying leadership; the administrator of designee initiates an investigation and ensures external reporting. The policy also indicated that care plans are also updated to include interventions to prevent recurrences. Review of the January 2026 physician orders for Resident R8 included the following diagnosis: congestive heart failures (CHF-a long-term condition that affects your heart's ability to pump blood well); epilepsy (a brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered resident care plan for one of twenty-two residents reviewed (Resident R77) Findings Include: Review of facility policy on care plans comprehensive persons-centered dated December 2016 Under section policy statement a comprehensive present-centered care plan that includes measurable goals and timetables must meet the residents physical psychological and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Under section policy interpretation and implementation number one the interdisciplinary team in conjunction with a resident and his or her family or legal representative develops and implements a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident #9 areas of concern that are identified during the resident assessment will be evaluated before interventions are added to the care plan #12 the comprehensive person centered care plan is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and reviews of clinical records, facility documentation and employee records, the facility failed to ensure that staff assigned to supervise residents during dining and provided cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a resident who was choking were certified in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). One of 22 residents reviewed. Findings Include:Review of facility policy Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) dated 2025, revealed that Personnel have completed training on the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and basic life support (BLS), including defibrillation, for victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Obtain and/or maintain American Red ' Cross or American Heart Association certification in Basic Life Support (BLS)/ Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for key clinical staff members who will direct resuscitative efforts.Review of facility policy Meal Supervision Policy dated January 2025, revealed that This policy applies to all nursing staff, healthcare assistants, dietary aids and any designated personnel involved in supervision of patient meals.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician orders related to Medication Administration for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident R53) Review facility policy on administering medications dated December 2012 reveal that under section policy statement medication shall be administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. under section policy interpretation and implementation #2 the director of nursing services will supervise and direct all nursing personnel who administer medications and or have related functions #3 medications must be administered in accordance with the orders including any required time frame #4 medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time unless otherwise specified for example before and after meal orders #7 the individual administering the medication must check the label three times to verify the right resident the right medication the right dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, it interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent accident hazards for 1 out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R8). Findings include:Review of the January 2026 physician orders for Resident R8 included the following diagnosis: congestive heart failures (CHF-a long-term condition that affects your heart's ability to pump blood well); epilepsy (a brain disorders that causes recurring seizures); schizophrenia (a serious mental health disorder characterized by symptoms that include false beliefs seeing things that are not present, hearing voices, and sounds that are not real, and disorganized thinking, affecting how individuals perceive reality and interact with the world); intellectual abilities (a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior, affecting everyday life skills and learning abilities); cognitive communication deficit (a condition that affects an individual's ability to communicate effectively due to impairments in cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's significant weight loss was addressed in a timely manner for 1 out of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R6).Findings include:Review of the facility policy, Weight Assessment and Intervention, with a revision date of March 2022 indicated that any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is taken is retaken the next day for confirmation. Review of the resident's January 2026 physician orders included the following diagnosis: hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys have become damaged over a specific period of time and have a hard time doing all their important jobs).Review of a monthly weight in the resident's clinical record dated May 3, 2025 documented the resident's weight at 138 pounds. Review of a monthly weight dated June 6, 2025 documented the resident's weight as 129 pounds, which is -9 pounds weight loss and a significant weight loss of -6.5%. Continued review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to offer routine dental services for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R74).Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident R74 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the resident was a long-term care resident. The payment source for resident's stay was listed as Medicaid/Medicaid plans. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 74, dated December 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Pennsylvania Medical Assistance Dental Coverage for Adults revealed that an adult can receive exams, x-rays, and cleanings once every 6 months.An interview with Resident R74 on January 20, 2026, at 2:01 p.m. stated he did not see dentist since she was admitted to the facility in March of 2025. He said he was having tooth pain, and he needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and an interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings include:An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on January 20, 2026, at 10:15 a.m. with Employee E5, Food Service Director (FSD), which revealed the following:Observation in the receiving area revealed a green dumpster with equipment piled behind it including a hospital style bedframe on the ground partially covered in snow, a stainless-steel counter height ice machine and a wheelchair with six leg rests piled on top of the armrests.Interview with the FSD at 9:30 a.m. on January 20, 2026, confirmed the above findings, and that the ice machine was no longer working. Interview with the Administrator on January 21, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. confirmed that the equipment did not belong in the receiving area and that it had been moved. 28 PA Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility documentation, clinical records and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of physician order for Resident R1 dated May 28, 2025, revealed that the resident was ordered for Lidocaine external patch 4% to skin topically one time a day for pain; Bacitracin (Antibiotic ointment) zinc external ointment to left ear topically two times daily; Balsam Peru Castor Oil (used to promote healing and treat certain types of skin ulcers and wounds.) external ointment to bilateral elbows and heels topically two times a day; Naproxen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ) oral Tablet 500 MG tablet by mouth two times a day for pain for 14 days. Review of Medication Administration Record for Resident R1 for the month of May 2025 revealed that the resident did not receive the above medications as ordered by the physicians on May 28, 2025. The reason documented was that the medications were not available. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and hospital record and policy and procedure review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that breathing treatments were prescribed upon admission and that medications were administered as order by the physician for one of fourteen residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled administering medications dated December, 2012 revealed that the all medications were to be administered by a licensed person(s) in a safe and timely manner as prescribed by the attending physician. The policy indicated that medications must be administered in accordance with orders, including any required time frames. A review of the policy titled reconciliation of medications on admission dated July 2027 revealed that it was the responsibility of the nurse to ensure the accurate accounting of residents' medications, routes and dosages upon admission to the facility. The nurse was to use the discharge summary from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the Food and Nutrition Services Department, interviews with residents and staff, reviews of clinical records and policies and procedures, it was determined that essential pieces of food service equipment used for the transportation, holding and delivery of hot foods from the dietary services department to the nursing units, resident rooms and dinning areas were not in use, to ensure consistently safe and satisfactory food temperatures of foods for the residents. (Residents R11, R57, R56, R5, R55, R28, R64, R46, R37, R34, R41, R27, R14 and R19). Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled resident tray assessment indicated that all hot foods were to be served hot at a temperature greater than or equal to 130 degrees Fahrenheit and served satisfactory for the residents' preferences and dietary care planning. A review of the undated policy titled service of hot liquids to prevent spills revealed that hot beverages were to be served hot and at a temperature less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit to meet the food preferences of the residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility financial and accounting documentation and interview with administrative staff, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate the maintenance of a complete, separate, and accurate accounting of each residents personal funds entrusted to the facility on the residence behalf for one of 24 residents reviewed (resident R28). Findings include: Review of facility policy Titled Personal Funds revealed If the facility has been designated to handle the personal funds of the resident, the business office will maintain a full complete and separate accounting according to generally accepted accounting principles of each resident's personal fund entrusted to the facility. A copy of the quarterly statement will be submitted to the resident, or the residents designated representative on a quarterly basis and or at the request of the designated representative or resident. Review of information submitted to the Department revealed that On October 21, 2024, nursing home administrator employee E1 became aware that resident R28 alleged that there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records, and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of 24 residents records reviewed were free from abuse/neglect (Residents 25). Findings include Review of the facility's employee abuse education received from the Nursing [NAME] Administrator defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. The documentation defines types of abuse and explains Mental/Emotion abuse, verbal or nonverbal acts which causes humiliation, shame, degradation, intimidation, fear and agitation. Review of the same documentation states verbal abuse is a type of mental abuse that can be oral, written, gestured language or sounds. It can be directed at or within hearing distance of the resident. Examples included: Harassment, mocking, yelling, intimation, talking disrespectfully and scolding. Review of clinical records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, clinical record and and policy and procedure reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate each resident for their discharge needs upon admission and throughout the resident's stay to ensure a successful individualized discharge plan was implemented for three of seven residents reviewed. (Residents R11, R34 and R46) Findings include: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Discharge Summary and Plan dated December, 2016 revealed that all residents would have a discharge plan developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her living environment. The policy also indicated that every resident was to receive evaluation by the interdisciplinary care team to develop a plan for discharge to the community or to another facility with the resident and their family member. The policy indicated that each resident and representative would be asked about their interest in returning to the community or other plans for transferring to another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with residents and staff, observations of care and services and policy and procedure reviews, it was determined that for one of three residents reviewed the facility failed to provide safe and comfortable adaptive equipment to ensure activities of daily living were maintained for mobility. (Resident R34) Findings include: A review of the policy titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting dated March of 2018 revealed that the facility was responsible for providing care, services and treatment to maintain or improve a residents' ability to carry out activities of daily living (hygiene, mobility, elimination, dining or communication). This policy indicated that the care and services was to be provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADL's independently. Clinical record review for Resident R34 revealed a quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] that indicated this resident was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated that this resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records and facility documentation and policies it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment for opioid addiction for two residents (Resident R56 and R61) in a timely manner which resulted in and/or a potential to cause the residents experiencing unwanted discomfort and withdrawal symptoms and failed to adequately assess a resident (Resident R61) in accordance with professional standards of practice and failed to inform the medical director when services were not rendered for two residents reviewed (Resident R56 and R61) and failed to properly assess and provide bowel care for one resident (Resident R81) of the 24 resident records reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy for Medication Shortage/Unavailable Medication revised April 2018 states when medications are not received for the resident the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in cooperation with the attending physician and the pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documentation, clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for two of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R56 andR61). Findings include: Review of facility policy for Medication Shortage/Unavailable Medication revised April 2018 states when medications are not received for the resident the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in cooperation with the attending physician and the pharmacy provider. If unable to obtain a response from the attending physician in a timely manner notify the nursing supervisor and contact the Medical Director for orders/directions. During a group session on December 10, 2024, at approximately 10:30 a.m., Resident R56 and R61 both agreed there are times the facility fails to have their medication Suboxone. Suboxone is a prescription drug used to treat opioid dependence. Withdrawal symptoms from Suboxone occur when the medication is missed in approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with staff and policy and procedure reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use, monitor and assess one of six residents for continued psychotropic drug use. (Resident R88) Findings include: A review of the policy titled psychotropic drug use dated January 1, 2021 revealed that it was the responsibility of the physician, facility staff, psychiatrist and pharmacist to choose the most effective medication for the resident that had the fewest possible side effects, adverse drug reactions and in the smallest effective dose. The policy indicated that each resident using psychotropic drugs would be monitored for adverse side effects, appropriate drug selection and appropriate drug dose. Clinical record review revealed a physician's ordered for divalproex sodium (depakote) oral capsule delayed release 125 mg give three capsules by mouth two times a day for agitation, since October 30, 2024. Pharmaceutical diagnoses for use of depakote was for epilepsy, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure two residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 8 residents reviewed. (Residents R69 and R64) Findings: Review of the National Institute of Health article titled Nursing rights of medication administration dated September 2023 revealed that it is standard during nursing education to receive instruction to clinical medication administration and upholding patient safety known as the five rights of medication administration, the five rights are : the right patient, right drug, right route, right time, and right dose. Patient safety and quality of care are essential components of nursing practices and priorities that demand consideration to enable the delivery of high-quality patient centered care and overall, well-being. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with the federal and state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policies, resident interviews, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices related to wound care for one of three residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident R47) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Wound Care revised October 2010 revealed the purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. One key element is cleanliness. Items to be used during procedure must be clean and arranged on a clean environment. Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, revealed enhanced barrier precautions EBP will be initiated for residents as an applicable in accordance with CMS and or state regulations in accordance with the CDC guidance to reduce the risks of transmission of multiple drug resistant organisms MDROS. Enhanced barrier precautions are applicable for residents with any of the following infection where colonization with an MDRO,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, facility policies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for four or four months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, and November 2024) Findings include: A review of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines, The core Element of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, revealed that Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority. 1. Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with the antibiotic use. 2. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)recommends that all acute care hospitals implement an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) and outline the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the physical environment of the food and nutrition department, reviews of the pest control operators reports and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of common household pests and rodents. Findings include: Observations of the main kitchen of the Food and Nutrition Department in the presence of the director of dietary services, Employee E10, at 9:30 a.m., on December 9, 2024 revealed the following: The industrial sized dish machine and the flooring surrounding this food service equipment was covered with a white/grayish tinted film, resembling hard water deposits of calcium and lime. The boundary of the flooring next to the wall area underneath the dish machine and three compartment sink contained a heavy accumulation of dirt and brown saturated slim. The grouting was missing between the ceramic tiles in the dish room and the food preparation area near the steam table, of the main kitchen. The flooring was porous, not easily cleanable and contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The undated Policy: Food Storage Policy, states, he Food Service Director and/or Cook(s) will insure that all food items are stored properly, covered containers must be airtight, labeled and dated using a two date system (prepared date and use by date). An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on February 21, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. with Employee E5, AM Cook, which revealed the following: Observation in the food preparation area revealed a 5-pound tub of peanut butter with no date of when it was opened or a use by date and it had peanut butter smeared on the outside of the container. Observation in the walk-in freezer revealed a brown cardboard box of fish cakes with the inner plastic liner open to the circulating air. Interview with the AM [NAME] at 9:30 a.m. on February 21, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and an interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Findings include: An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on February 21, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. with Employee E5, AM Cook, which revealed the following: Observation in the receiving area revealed three green dumpsters, the middle dumpster had the one of the lids on the top open. Around the dumpster on the right was a lot of debris including used latex gloves, paper, straws, cups, lids, empty pudding cup, empty yogurt cup and a plastic bag sticking out from underneath the dumpster. Interview with the AM [NAME] at 9:30 a.m. on February 21, 2024, confirmed the above findings. 28 PA Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to complete residents' comprehensive and quarterly assessments in a timely manner. for eight of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R79, R59, R15, R3, R38, 6, R1 and R50) Findings Include: Refer to citation: 636, 638. Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 12 months as required. Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a quarterly assessment was completed not less frequency than once every 3 months as required. Interview with MDS coordinator, Employee E7 on February 23, 2024, at 10:44 a.m., confirmed that the MDS's were completed late. She stated she was busy with case management responsibilities and there were over 17 short term residents that required case management services. She did not have enough time to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff had the proper competencies including intravenous (IV) catheter care, trach care and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) administration care for six of six licensed nurse training records reviewed (E11, E13, E14, E15, E21 & E22). Findings include: Review of the provided facility policies did not reveal any policy related to nursing competencies. Review of training records provided did not reveal any competencies requested including IV (Intravenous) catheter care, trach care and TPN (Total Parental Nutrition) administration care for Employees E13, E14 and E21. A review of training records for Employees E11, E15 and E22 revealed incomplete competencies as follows: -Employees E11 & E22 had TPN partially completed (no skill assessment) and no competencies for IV or Trach care. -Employee E15 had no competency for TPN. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 26, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policy, review of facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor and track the antibiotic use for seven of nine months of antibiotic data requested for review (June, July, August, September, October, November and December, 2023). Finding Include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic use and outcome dated December 2016, revealed that Antibiotic usage and outcome data will b collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance racking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the Infection Preventionist, or designee. 2. The IP, or designee,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be informed of their care plan meeting for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R59). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, with a revision date of September 2013, indicated that the resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardians or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Review of the February 2024 physician orders for Resident R59 included the diagnoses of morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it); atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that can cause fatigue, palpitations, stroke, and other complications); depression (a mental health condition that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) ; muscle weakness, and hypertension (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that personal belongings were accounted for three of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R83, R58 and R60). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Admissions, Transfers and Discharge, with a revision date of September 2013 indicated that when taking inventory of a resident's personal effects, staff should inventory all clothing, equipment, valuables, etc. and record the quantity of each item, a discreption of each item and other identifying factors as necessary or appropriate. The policy also indicated that when all items have been inventoried and recorded on the Inventory of Personal Effects form, staff is to sign their name, and instruct the resident and/or his/her family member who witnessed the inventory to also sign the form. Continued review of the policy also indicated that staff is to provide the reident and/or family member with a copy of the completed and signed inventory form. Review of the resident's February 2024 physician orders indicated that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified of a fall incident sustained by a resident for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R89). Findings include: Review the February 2024 physician orders for Resident R89 indicated that the resident was admitted into the facility from the hospital on January 5, 2024 with the diagnoses of seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness); cerebral infarction (a stroke); chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD- a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing); alcohol abuse; substance abuse; anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome); depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), in addition to a right below the knee amputation. Review of a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 12 months as required for two of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1 and R50) Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R50 revealed that the resident had an admission MDS (Assessment of Resident Care Needs) assessment completed on January 27, 2023. Further review of the clinical record the revealed that the annual assessment was scheduled with an assessment reference date (ARD) of January 10, 2024. Continued review of the clinical record revealed that the assessment was not completed until February 19, 2024. Review of clinical record for Resident R1 revealed that the resident had a modification admission MDS assessment completed on January 18, 2023. Further review of the clinical record the revealed that the annual assessment was scheduled with an assessment reference date (ARD) of January 10, 2024. Continued review of the clinical record revealed that the assessment was not completed until oon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a quarterly assessment was completed not less frequency than once every 3 months as required for six of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R79, R59, R15, R3, R38, R6) Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R79 revealed that the resident had an admission MDS (Assessment of Resident Care Needs) assessment completed on October 13, 2023. Further review of the clinical record the revealed that the quarterly assessment was scheduled with an assessment reference date (ARD) of January 10, 2024. Continued review of the clinical record revealed that the assessment was not completed until February 19, 2024. Review of clinical record for Resident R59 revealed that the resident had a quarterly MDS assessment completed on October 18, 2023. Further review of the clinical record the revealed that the quarterly assessment was scheduled with an assessment reference date (ARD) of January 17, 2024. Continued review of the clinical record revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the State mental health authority and/or the State intellectual disability authority was notified of a significant change in resident's mental health status which required admission into a psychiatric facility for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R48). Findings include: Review of the February 2024 physician orders for Resident R48 included the diagnoses of anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome); cognitive communication deficit (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to communicate); depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest); schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by fixed false convictions in something that is not real of shared by other people, seeing, hearing, feeling or smelling something that does not exist, disorganized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident received activities of daily living care related to shaving and haircuts for 2 out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R58 and R60). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, with a revised date of October 2021, indicated that resident will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. The policy also stated that appropriate care and services will be provided for resident who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently with the consent of the resident in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); toileting mobility and eating. Review of the February, 2024 physician orders for Resident R58 included the following diagnoses: cerebral infarction (a stroke); lymphedema (a condition that results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that foot care needs were provided timely for one of 48 residents reviewed (Resident 73). Findings include: Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 73, dated November 22, 2023, revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 which indicated that resident's cognitive status was severely impaired. Review of care plan for Resident R73 dated June 8, 2023, revealed that the resident required assistance for mobility and Activities of Daily Living functions. Observation of Resident R73 on February 23, 2024, at 12:41 p.m. with Director of Nursing, Employee E2, revealed that the resident had long and thick toenails on both feet. The nail was discolored with yellowish and whitish discoloration which appeared like infected nails. Employee E2 confirmed the finding and stated she would be contacting the physician for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff and residents, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during medication administration for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R59). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Administering Medications, with a revised date of December 2012 indicated that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.The policy also indicated that residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of the February 2024 physician orders for Resident R59 included the following diagnoses: morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it); atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that can cause fatigue, palpitations, stroke, and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer intravenous (IV) nutrition in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed on IV therapy (Resident R245). Findings include: Review of facility policy Parenteral Nutrition (TPN - a method of providing nutrition where a liquid formula is given into a vein through an intravenous catheter), revised July 2017, revealed a physician order is necessary for this treatment. The TPN order should include the formula or a list of all ingredients/nutrients in the base solution, volume, and rate of administration as well as an order for monitoring lab results on a routine basis. The facility must verify with the State Nurse Practice Act the role of the Nurse. Continued review of section Safety Precautions revealed the event that the TPN is stopped or discontinued suddenly, parenteral nutrition will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided consistent with physician orders for two of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident R89 and Resident R81) Findings include: Interview with Resident R89 on February 21, 2024, at 11:46 a.m. stated he did not receive her pain medications and some other medications ordered by the physician consistently. He stated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and staff stated, some of his medications were not available as they were waiting for the pharmacy to deliver the medications. He did not receive the medication for three days after the admission and he was in pain, with pain level ranging from 8 to 10 of a scale of 10. Resident also stated two weeks ago that happened again, his pain medication was not available, and staff told him they were waiting for the pharmacy to deliver. Review of physician orders for Resident R89 revealed an order dated January 5, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documentation, clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for one of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident R89) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Providing Pharmacy Services with a revision date of January 1, 2021, indicated that the pharmacy will ensure that facility staff has access to medications, emergency services for medications, and drug information on a 24 hour basis. Interview with Resident R89 on February 21, 2024, at 11:46 a.m. stated he did not receive her pain medications and some other medications ordered by the physician consistently. He stated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and staff stated, some of his medications were not available as they were waiting for the pharmacy to deliver the medications. He did not receive the medication for three days after the admission and he was in pain, with pain level ranging from 8 to 10 of a scale of 10. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store, label, and dispense drugs according to professional standards of practice for one of 28 resident medication observations. (Resident R15) Findings Include: During a medication administration observation on February 22, 2024, at 8:54 a.m. with Employee E24, Licensed Practical Nurse, for Resident R15. It was observed that staff took an unlabeled clear 30 ml medication cup from the cart. Inside the cup there were white colored tablets. Staff administered the medication to the resident. During interview with Licensed staff, Employee E24 at the time of the observation Employee E24 stated that the medication Colace 100mg tablet was not available in the medication cart, and she took few pills from the other cart in a cup and placed it inside the cart to administer to the resident for morning medication administration. Interview with Director of Nursing, Employee E2, on February 23, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. stated that the staff should not keep the medication in unlabeled containers. Employee E2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of facility's policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that complete and accurate documentation for one out of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R89). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation, with a revision date of July 2017 indicated that all services provided to the resident progress toward care plan goals, or any change in the resident's medical, physical, function or psychosocial conditions, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy also indicated that the medical record should facilitation communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review the February 2024 physician orders for Resident R89 indicated that the resident was admitted into the facility from the hospital on January 5, 2024 with the following diagnosis seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure its nurse aide staff was receiving in-service training to be proficient and competent and that the training be no less that 12 hours annually for two of six nurse aides reviewed (Employees E19 and E16). Findings Include: Review of the nurse aide annual training information provided for nurse aide Employee E19 during the survey revealed that there were only six hours of annual training documentation to review and did not meet the twelve hours of annual training requirement. Review of the nurse aide annual training information provided during the survey revealed that nurse aide Employee E16 had only eight hours of training documentation to review and did not meet the twelve hours of annual training requirement. An interview with the Director of Nursing on February 26, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. confirmed that these nurse aides did not meet the minimum required hours of training. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for one out of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) (OSA occurs when the upper airway becomes blocked, leading to brief pauses in breathing during sleep), and Asthma (Asthma is a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation and muscle tightening around the airways, which makes it harder to breathe). Observation of Resident R4 on January 26, 2024, at 10:40 a.m., revealed the Resident R1 had untrimmed facial hair, and long fingernails with dark substance under the fingernails. During interviewed with Resident R1 on January 25, 2024 the resident stated that no staff offered him to trim the facial hair and nails. 28 Pa. Code: 211.11(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Sleep Apnea (OSA) (OSA occurs when the upper airway becomes blocked, leading to brief pauses in breathing during sleep), and Asthma (Asthma is a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation and muscle tightening around the airways, which makes it harder to breathe). A review of Resident R1's clinical records revealed a physician order, dated March 21, 2023, to administer Oxygen 4 liters/minute, via nasal canula (nasal cannula is a thin tube, often affixed behind the ears and used to deliver oxygen directly to the nostrils from a source connected with tubing), every shift; and a physician order, dated, December 1, 2023, to change oxygen tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, clinical record review, review of facility records and documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs between shifts to enable an accurate reconciliation and accountability for four of four medication carts observed. (1st Floor front cart and back cart, Second Floor front cart and back cart) Findings include: Observation conducted on October 31, 2023, from 9:38 am to 11:05 during the tour of the first and second floor units revealed that there were two medication carts (front cart and back cart) for the First-floor unit and two medication carts (front cart and back cart) on the Second-floor unit. Interview with Second floor unit manager, Employee E3 conducted on October 31, 2023, at 9:50 am confirmed that the Second floor had two medication carts and one med room. Further Employee E3 revealed that only the medication nurses, the DON (Director of Nursing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LICHTSCHEIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 06/04/2021
LICHTSCHEIN, RAPHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL32%since 06/04/2021
MULLER, MARTINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST28%since 06/04/2021
GEWIRTZMAN, YEHUDAHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/04/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$144K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 7%Other / private 9%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $144K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$326per resident / day
operating cost
$9,919per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next