No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lafayette Manor, INC

147 Lafayette Manor Road, Uniontown, PA 15401 · Non profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (724) 430-4848 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 430-4848 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Sep 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
135 Wayland Smith Dr Ste 102 · (724) 437-7500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
120 Matthew Dr · (724) 439-6681 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.2 mi
650 W Main St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Ohio Pile0.9 mi
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
700 W Main St · (724) 437-8101

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.2%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.6%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.9%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.2%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.8%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.8%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.091.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.721.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.4%CMS range 46.6–67.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.2–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 84.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-26)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of five residents (Resident R1). This was identified as past non-compliance.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Elopement - Missing Resident dated 1/29/25, indicated the facility will provide a safe environment for all residents regardless of orientation status and to supervise those residents at risk for elopement. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2025, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident group meeting, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for one of five residents (Residents R).Findings include:Review of facility policy Call Bell/Call Light dated 1/29/25, indicated to ensure resident has a means to summon assistance. To respond to a resident's call for assistance in a timely manner.During the resident group meeting held on 9/25/25, at 1:00 p.m., the resident consensus stated that the facility staff do not respond to call bells timely, they often have to wait, or staff turn off the call bell and say they'll come back and it's often and hour or longer before they return.Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent re-admission dated of 7/5/25, with diagnoses which included diabetes, heart flutter and pneumonia.Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on one of two nursing units (first floor nursing unit).Findings included:Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment dated 1/29/25, indicated residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.During an observation on 9/23/25 at 9:44 a.m., the left shower room had a broken wall and floor border tiles and the shower room on the right had uneven flooring and broken wall tiles.During an observation on 9/25/25, from 9:30 a.m., through 9:40 a.m., the following was observed:Hall of the 100-room numbers had flooring uneven and liftingResident R69's room had broken loose floor tiles under sink. Tiles behind bed were warped and the cable wire was hanging such that it could get pulled down and cause potential injury.Resident R6's room had missing floor trim near bathroom leaving broken wall.Resident R70's room had loose, missing floor tiles by heater and flooring to entrance of bathroom and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications and/or biologicals in one of two medication rooms (Second Floor Medication Room). Findings include:Review of facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated 1/28/25, indicated that medications and biologicals will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility.During an observation on 9/23/25, at 10:25 a.m. of the First Floor Medication Room the following was observed:(14) DualCap IV Pole Strips disinfecting caps for male connectors with an expiration date of 5/4/22(3) [NAME] Binax Now Covid-19 Antigen self-test 2-pack with an expiration date of 5/15/23(5) Volumat VL PR72-11 Primary Infusion Set with 0.2-micron filter with an expiration date of 3/8/25(5) Volumat VL PR72-11 Primary Infusion Set with 0.2-micron filter with an expiration date of 3/17/25(4) Volumat VL PR72-11 Primary Infusion Set with 0.2-micron filter with an expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination on one of two nursing units ( first floor nursing unit).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Infection Control dated 1/29/25, indicated that staff noted to have a confirmed or suspected viral respiratory infection will be restricted from work until 3 days have passed since symptoms. This guidance supersedes existing CDC and DOH guidance specific to health care personnel.Review of the facility policy Infection Control COVID-19 dated 1/29/25, indicated that the facility will minimize exposures to respiratory pathogens and adhere to CDC's core principles of infection control. The staff and residents will utilize universal source control and wear masks, especially with close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for two of three residents (Resident R71 and R73).Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement reviewed 1/28/25, indicated the facility will provide a safe environment for all residents to the extent possible. The facility will assess residents and their plans of care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement within eight hours of admission and on a quarterly basis. The facility defines elopement as When a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included history of traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and impulse disorder. Review of a Elopement Risk Determination assessment completed 3/20/25, indicated Resident R71 was not at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for and care of an urostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen wall to allow urine to exit the body when the bladder is not functioning properly), and failed to provide resident-centered interventions for urostomy in the care plan for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of facility policy Suprapubic Catheter / Urological Device Care and Management dated 1/28/25, indicated a physician order for the urological device is obtained including the size of the catheter (a hollow flexible tube that is inserted through a narrow opening in the body cavity for removing fluid), the frequency of the catheter change, flushes, and routine care. Review of facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning dated 1/28/25, indicated a comprehensive person-centered care plan including necessary and appropriate care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) assessment for one of five hospice (a special model of care for patients who are in the late phase of an incurable illness and wish to receive end-of-life care) residents reviewed (Residents R8).Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (reference used to complete an MDS) effective 10/1/2019, indicated that the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. Review of facility policy Hospice Services reviewed 1/28/25, indicated the facility contracts with hospice provider(s) to afford the resident's an opportunity to elect hospice services when the resident is diagnosed with a terminal condition and meets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (First and Second Floor Nursing Units). Based on observations, review of facility policy, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (First and Second Floor Nursing Units). Findings included: Review of the facility policy Homelike Environment dated 1/28/25, indicated in part The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations S483.10(i) Safe Environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for five of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5). Based on observations, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for five of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5). Findings Include: During observations of resident rooms on the first and second floors on 8/12/25, from 9:40 a.m., through 11:45 a.m., incontinence diapers were being placed in rooms.During an interview on 8/12/25, at 10:22 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employees E1 and E2 confirmed that the facility only allows eight incontinence diapers per resident, and they were told they are not to get any more, if they run out, they have to wait for the Supervisor to get them. Staff stated, residents are to be changed every two hours, we need 12 then at least and what happens if the resident goes through more because of diarrhea? During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document meal consumption for six of seven residents observed. (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Charting and Documentation dated 1/2/24, indicated Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. During an observation on 6/29/25, at 12:40 p.m. Resident R1's meal was noted to be approximately 25% consumed. Review of Resident R1's Task List history indicated that on 6/29/25, at 11:42 a.m. NA Employee E1 documented Resident R1's meal consumption was 75%. During an observation on 6/29/25, at 12:47 p.m. Resident R2's meal was noted to be approximately 75% consumed. Review of Resident R2's Task List history indicated that on 6/29/25, at 11:41 a.m. NA Employee E1 documented Resident R2's meal consumption was 100%. During an observation on 6/29/25, at 12:48 p.m. Resident R3's meal was noted to be approximately 25% consumed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to verify the washing temperature of the dish machine in the main kitchen, which created the potential for foodborne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Automated Ware Washing Policy, dated 1/2/24, with a previous review date of 8/17/23, indicated that the dish machine will be checked prior to meals to assure proper functioning and appropriate temperatures for cleaning and sanitation. The food service manager will train staff to monitor dish machine temperatures throughout the process. Review of the facility policy Dish Machine Temperature Log, dated 1/4/24, with a previous review date of 8/17/23, indicated that dishwashing staff will monitor and record dish machine temperatures to assure proper sanitizing of dishes. Temperatures for wash is identified as >/= 160 degrees, with the final rinse temperature as >/= 180 degrees. During observation of the main kitchen on 9/4/24, at 9: 30 a.m., the following was identified: The dish machine valves did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential for cross contamination during a dressing change. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Dry/Clean Dressings dated 1/4/24, indicated to clean the bedside stand before and after dressing change. Tape a biohazard bag or plastic bag on the bedside stand or use the waste basket below clean field. Pull glove over old dressing and discard into plastic or biohazard bag. Cleanse the wound with ordered cleanser. Clean for the least contaminated area to the most contaminated area (usually from center outward). Review of the facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 1/4/24, indicated the infection prevention and control program is developed to address the facility-specific infection control needs and requirements identified. Policies and procedures are utilized as the standards of the infection prevention and control program. Important facets of infection prevention include educating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and incident investigation documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from misappropriation of property for three of five residents (Resident R54, R92 and R94)/ This was identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure dated 1/2/24, indicated that the facility will assure that the resident is free from misappropriation of property, which the policy defined as, the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of facility provided documents indicated medications signed out by LPN Employee E6 form 8/15/24, at 7:00 p.m., shift through 8/17/24, 7:00 a.m., revealed the following: Resident R54 had 3 pills of Oxycodone 5mg (commonly referred to as Percocet, an opiod pain medication used to treat moderately severe pain) signed out, but not administered. Resident R92 had four pills of Hydrocodone/APAP 5/325mg (commonly known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of resident chosen menus, observations, resident council minutes and meeting and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow resident food preferences for three of four residents (Resident R63, R92 and R700). Findings include: During an observation conducted for tray accuracy on 9/5/24, for the breakfast and lunch meals it was revealed that the facility failed to provide the residents with their food preferences as follows: Breakfast Meal: * Resident R63 requested scrambled eggs and cranberry juice, the facility failed to provide either item and the resident received pancakes. * Resident R92 requested oatmeal and received cold cereal. During an interview on 9/5/24, at 8:24 a.m., Resident R63 stated that they always put on what they want to give you. During an interview on 9/5/24, at 8:25 a.m., Resident R92's representative stated that she has seen when her mother has not had items on her trays for all meals. Lunch Meal * Resident R700 wanted a hotdog and cheese curls and received a chopped hot dog and no cheese curls. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of cited deficiencies from the facility's abbreviated survey of 5/24/24, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previous cited deficiencies. This has the potential to effect all 83 residents of the facility. The findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending May 24, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September 6,2024, identified a repeated deficiency related to misappropriation of property and implementation of the policies and procedures to prohibit abuse and misappropriation of resident property for three of three residents. The facility QAPI Committee is responsible for the review and approval of facility policies, procedures and guidelines on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation for five of ten staff members (Employees E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. During an interview on 9/6/24, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on Abuse, Neglect, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on infection control for six of ten staff members (Employees E8, E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E8 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. Review of NA Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on infection control. During an interview on 9/6/24, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment and care to promote dignity for each resident's quality of life for two of six sampled residents (Resident R500 and R501). Findings: Review of facility policy Resident Rights reviewed 1/4/24, indicated employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These include: a dignified existence; treated with respect, kindness, dignity, and self-determination. Review of facility policy Dignity reviewed 1/4/24, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. Demeaning practices and standards of care that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, staff education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides (Employees E8 and E12). Finding include: Review of the facility policy, Staff Training Requirements dated 1/2/24, previously reviewed 8/17/23, indicated the facility will provide in-depth review of operational policies and procedures to all employees. All in-service training for all personnel will be conducted at a minimum of annually. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E8 and E12's education records with hire date greater than 12 months revealed the following: NA Employee E8 had a hire date of 2/28/22 with approximately 4.97 hours of in-service education between 2/28/23, and 2/28/24. NA Employee E12 had a hire date of 11/14/22, with zero hours of in-service education between 11/14/22 and 11/14/23. NA Employee E12 had not completed any in-services for 2024 as of the survey exit date of 9/6/24. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and incident investigation documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from misappropriation of property for 12 of 15 residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12). This was identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure dated 8/17/23, indicated that the facility will assure that the resident is free from misappropriation of property, which the policy defined as, the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Review of facility investigation of medications signed out by LPN Employee E1 form 5/10/24, at 1:45 p.m. through 5/11/24, at 7:15 a.m. revealed the following: -Resident R1 had three pills of oxycodone/apap (commonly referred to as Percocet, an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to moderately severe pain) 7.5/3.5 mg signed out, but not administered. -Resident R2 had two pills of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident interviews and confidential staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of six of twelve residents (Resident R6, R14, R15, R16, and R17). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living dated 8/17/23, indicated Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. During an interview and observation on 5/17/24, at 1:45 p.m. Resident R14 was noted to have long, jagged fingernails. When asked, Resident R14 confirmed that she would like her nails clipped. During an interview on 5/17/24, at 2:50 p.m. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Administering Medications, dated 8/17/23, indicated that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/10/24, included the diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), and cancer. Review of Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs revealed the Resident R14 had received chemotherapy within the previous 14 days of the assessment. Review of Resident R14's medication administration record (MAR) dated April 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) documents, facility policy, clinical record review, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures to prevent the possible transmission of communicable diseases for one of three residents (Resident R14). Review of the CDC document, Neutropenia and Risk for Infection dated 2/26/24, defined neutropenia as the decrease in the number of white blood cells, the body's main defense against infection, and further stated that neutropenia is common after receiving chemotherapy and increases the risk for the development of infection. The facility policy Transmission Based Precautions dated 8/17/23, indicated facility strives to maintain a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by utilizing the least restrictive precautions or isolation for the resident under certain circumstances.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records,facility submitted documents, facility investigation information and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility abuse policy for two out of seven abuse allegations (Residents R14 and R62). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure last reviewed on 8/17/23, with a previous review date of 3/1/22, indicated that the facility will assure that every resident is free from verbal, sexual and mental abuse, etc. by developing and implementing policies. Every precaution will be taken to protect residents from neglect and abuse and every allegation will be thoroughly investigated. The employee under investigation will be suspended from employment during he investigation period. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety, back pain, inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. A MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included risk for skin tears and interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one of twelve residents (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Person-Centered Plan of Care last reviewed on 8/17/23, with previous review date of 3/1/22, indicated that a baseline plan of care will be developed within 48 hours of admission to include appropriate interventions to provide an initial set of instructions to provide effective and person centered care of the resident to meet the professional standards of quality care. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cellulitis of right lower leg, vitamin B12 deficiency, eosinophilia(having too many eosinophils(white blood cells) which may contribute to inflammatory conditions) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displayed mental or psychosocial adjustment difficulties received appropriate treatment and services to correct the problem for one of three residents (Resident R15). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Behavioral Management dated 8/17/23, indicated all residents receive care and services to assist in reaching and maintaining the highest level of mental and psychosocial functioning. The interdisciplinary team will review the behaviors and develop and individualized care plan to address the resident's needs. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected) kidney failure, heart disease, and depression. Review of Resident R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for one of five residents (Resident R15). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 8/17/23, indicated residents will not receive PRN (as needed) doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record and non-pharmacologic interventions must be attempted and documented. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected) kidney failure, heart disease, and depression. Review of Resident R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 8/8/23, indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognition, rarely understood and understands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and complete accurate documentation for one of three residents with behaviors (Resident R15). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Behavior Management dated 8/17/23, indicated when a behavior is identified the licensed nurse will document in the clinical record and behavior records will be used. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included kidney failure, heart disease, and depression. Review of Resident R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 8/8/23, indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognition, rarely understood and understands others, has physical behaviors towards others, and resists care. The diagnoses remained current. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident R15 indicated on 8/1/23, the resident became restless and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of federal regulation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide transfer notices to representatives of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division. Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.15(c)(3) Notice Before Transfer: Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must- (i) Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Federal Regulations further define emergency transfers as, When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, this type of transfer is considered to be a facility-initiated transfer. During an interview on 9/6/24, at 10:13 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to provide transfer notices to representatives of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, nursing staff personnel records, nurse training documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff received annual in-service education for 10 of 10 nursing personnel (Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E8, E9, and E10, E11 and E12), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13, E15 and E16) and Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 and E17). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Staff Training Requirements and Orientation Components 1/2/24, with a previous review date of 8/17/23, indicated that the facility will provide in-service training for all personnel initially upon hire and regularly scheduled. All personnel are required to attend staff development/ training classes. Ongoing education programs planned are topics outlined by regulation. These include residents' rights, accident prevention, restorative nursing techniques, emergency preparedness, resident abuse detection and reporting, communication skills, compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five out of five nurse aides (NA Employee E8, E9, E10, E11, and E12). Findings include: Review of facility provided performance evaluations revealed the following: Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E8 had a hire date of 2/28/22, failed to have a performance evaluation between 2/28/23, and 2/28/24. NA Employee E9 had a hire date of 6/12/23, failed to have a performance evaluation by 6/12/24. NA Employee E10 had a hire date of 11/17/16, failed to have a performance evaluation between 11/17/22 and 11/17/23. NA Employee E11 had a hire date of 1/27/23, failed to have a performance evaluation by 1/27/24. NA Employee E12 had a hire date of 11/14/22, failed to have a performance evaluation by 11/14/23. During an interview on 9/4/24, at 1:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five of five nurse aides as required. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Communication training to five of ten direct care facility staff reviewed (Employees E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Finding include: Review of facility education documents revealed the facility failed to offer Communication education to its direct care staff members. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E12's facility provided information did not include training on effective communication. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on effective communication. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on effective communication. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on effective communication. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on effective communication. During an interview on 9/6/24, at 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for six of ten staff members (Employees E8, E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E8's facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. Review of NA Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on resident rights. During an interview on 9/6/24, at 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for six of ten staff members.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to five of ten facility staff reviewed (E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Finding include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. During an interview on 9/6/24, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on QAPI for Employees E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20(c) Staff Development.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on compliance and ethics for six of ten staff members (Employees E8, E12, E14, E15, E16, and E17). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E8 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E15 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of LPN Employee E16 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. Review of RN Employee E17 ' s facility provided information did not include training on compliance and ethics. During an interview on 9/6/24, at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-06 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for ten of ten staff members (Employees E8, E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16. E17). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aid (NA) Employee E8 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of NA Employee E9 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of NA Employee E10 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of NA Employee E11 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of NA Employee E12 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E13 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E14 ' s facility provided information did not include training on behavioral health. Review of LPN Employee E15 ' s facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KETTERMAN, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/10/2023
DUGGAN, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2023
ROWE, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2023
WAGNER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2023
WALDROP, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 9%Other / private 28%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$474per resident / day
operating cost
$14,414per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$390per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395795. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next