Watsontown Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
245 East Eighth Street, Watsontown, PA 17777 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (570) 538-2561 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,765 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-04)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.8% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.3%CMS range 27.8–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.4–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.5–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.73 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 118.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed clinical record review, review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to to provide the services necessary to prevent accidents resulting in multiple sustained fractures for one of five residents reviewed resulting in actual harm (Resident CR1). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed a nursing note dated [DATE], at 9:09 PM noting the resident was being turned by a nurse aide and rolled off the bed onto the floor. It was noted the resident had a left dorsal head bump and complaints of severe left hip pain. A follow up nursing note for Resident CR1 dated [DATE], at 9:23 PM indicated the physician had provided a verbal order to send the resident to the emergency room due to the severe left hip pain. Nursing documentation dated [DATE], at 11:34 PM summarized the incident that occurred prior to being transferred to the hospital. The writer noted they heard a loud thump outside of Resident CR1's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident to be free from neglect by not providing the services necessary to avoid actual harm related to a fracture on one of two nursing units (Upper level, Resident 1). Findings include: An observation of Resident 1 on December 11, 2023, at 12:16 PM revealed the resident sitting in a wheelchair in front of his bed. A brace was observed on his right leg. When Resident 1 was asked why he was wearing the brace on his leg he stated, one person, (as he held up one finger), tried to put me in bed and didn't use the disc thing. Resident 1 stated it was immediate pain. Resident 1 stated it was the staff members first time working with him, and he has not seen her since. Resident 1 did not know the staff member's name. Resident 1 pointed to an electric wheelchair sitting by his door and stated, I can't use that now, and indicated he had to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans related to safe positioning during meals for 19 of 32 residents (Residents R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20).Findings include: Review of the facility, Comprehensive Care Plan Policy dated 6/4/25, indicated the comprehensive, person-centered care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs dated 3/2/26, included diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), brain cancer, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R2's Speech Therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately respond to a resident's change in condition for two of five residents (Resident R1 and R21).Findings include: Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information for duloxetine (Cymbalta, an antidepressant medication) dated 08/2023, indicated, in the Warnings and Precautions section revealed abnormal bleeding was included. Review of the facility policy, Change in Condition dated 6/1/25, indicated, The facility shall notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in theresident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs dated 1/13/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, resident interviews, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration prescribing information for duloxetine (Cymbalta, an antidepressant medication) dated 08/2023, indicated, The recommended starting dosage in adults with MDD is 40 mg/day (given as 20 mg twice daily). Review of the facility policy Medication Error Reporting dated 6/4/25, indicated medication errors are documented and reported in an effort to identify the causes of the errors and develop strategies to prevent medication errors. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs dated 1/13/26, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies, observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for the risk of side rail entrapment for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 2, 6, 8, 22, and 64). Findings include: The FDA (The United States Food and Drug Administration) Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, is guidance that identifies key parts of the body at risk for entrapment, describes potential entrapment areas or zones, and recommends maximum and minimum dimensional limits of gaps or openings in hospital bed systems. Three key body parts at risk for life-threatening entrapment in the seven zones of a hospital bed system discussed in this guidance are the head, neck, and chest. To reduce the risk of head entrapment, openings in the bed system should not allow the widest part of a small head (head breadth measured across the face from ear to ear) to be trapped. The FDA is using a head breadth dimension of 120 mm (4.75 inches) as the basis for its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide professional dental services for three of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 8, 31, and 56).Findings include: Interview with Resident 31 on September 10, 2025, at 10:32 AM revealed that she had natural teeth; however, she was missing some teeth. Observation of Resident 31 on the date and time of the interview confirmed that she had natural teeth with noticeable gaps from missing teeth. Clinical record review for Resident 31 revealed documentation by the facility's consultant dentist dated March 13, 2024, that recommended a treatment plan that included an annual exam. Resident 31's clinical record contained no evidence of additional services from the consultant dentist in the 18 months since March 13, 2024. Interview with Resident 8 on September 10, 2025, at 10:57 AM revealed that she had no teeth or dentures in her top jaw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on September 9, 2025, at 10:12 AM revealed flooring throughout the main kitchen was blackened. Dirt/debris buildup was observed in several areas of the grout and under equipment. Significant black buildup was observed under the dish machine area, which was covered in water as staff were washing breakfast dishes during the observation. The cove base molding surrounding the kitchen contained black buildup. Several broken and cracked floor tiles were also observed in the area outside the dry storage room and corridor to the receiving dock. Employee 6, dietary manager, indicated during the observation that the flooring and cove base has been a repeated issue, and he has tried scrubbing it but has not been able to get it clean. The above findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 10, 2025, at 2:30 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control and water management program to provide an environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on two of two nursing units (Upper Level, Residents 4, 6, 19, 32, 57, 59, 64, 78, 123; and Lower Level, Residents 45 and 70). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised June 1, 2025 revealed that the elements of the infection prevention and control program consist of items that included coordination/oversight, policies, surveillance, and outbreak management. The infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen by an infection prevention specialist (infection preventionist) or designee. Surveillance data and reporting information is used to inform the committee of potential issues and trends. Surveillance tools are used for recognizing the occurrence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer residents pneumococcal immunizations for four of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 3, 8, 31, and 76).Findings include: Review of the policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine Guidelines, last revised March 10, 2025, revealed that the facility will offer residents the pneumococcal vaccine to aid in preventing pneumococcal infections as applicable per physician order. The procedure noted that previous immunization information will be requested during the pre-admission process. A representative from the admissions office/designee will obtain and forward copies of the immunization records to the admitting nurse. Staff will verify the data with the resident and/or authorized representative when applicable. The pre-admission immunizations will be added to the electronic immunization record/EMR. The immunization record/EMR will be updated with each offer (administrations and refusals) of the pneumococcal vaccine. Each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding a cardiac pacemaker for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 38) and develop a comprehensive and person-centered care plan for one of two residents reviewed with a tracheostomy (Resident 42).Findings Include: Clinical record review for Resident 38 revealed a diagnosis list that included the presence of a cardiac pacemaker (an electronic device to help regulate the beating of the heart) and sick sinus syndrome (a disorder that causes the heart to beat abnormally). Nursing documentation for Resident 38 on admission to the facility on August 20, 2025, at 5:07 PM revealed that the resident had a cardiac pacemaker. Hospital documentation for Resident 38 dated August 14, 2025, noted a problem list for the resident that included a history of a cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident 38's care plan revealed no current comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed the resident's pacemaker, any associated pacemaker checks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to coordinate hospice services per a coordinated plan of care for one of one resident reviewed for hospice care concerns (Resident 13).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 13 revealed nursing documentation dated April 1, 2025, at 3:17 PM that Resident 13 was admitted to a contracted hospice provider. Observation of Resident 13 on September 9, 2025, at 1:43 PM revealed that the registered nurse from the contracted hospice provider was at his bedside. The registered nurse explained to Resident 13 that he was not receiving services from the hospice aide because the contracted hospice provider did not have enough nurse aides currently on the schedule. The registered nurse explained to Resident 13 that people receiving hospice services in the community would get preference when assigning nurse aide services. Interview with Employee 9 (registered nurse from the facility's contracted hospice provider) on September 9, 2025, at 2:29 PM confirmed that according to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain routine services from an eye care professional for one of one resident reviewed for vision concerns (Resident 31).Findings include: Interview with Resident 31 on September 10, 2025, at 10:34 AM revealed that she used eyeglasses only for reading. Resident 31 stated that she could not recall when the last time was she saw a doctor or eye care professional for vision services. Resident 31 stated, I need stronger ones (glasses). Clinical record review for Resident 31 revealed that the facility admitted her on February 17, 2022. Resident 31's diagnoses list included diagnoses known to create the potential for eye health concerns as follows: Diabetes (high blood sugar)Long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (long term use of medications that can cause complications of the cornea, or outer surface of the eye)Hypertension (high blood pressure)Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats/cholesterol in the blood) Documentation by the facility's contracted eye care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain professional podiatry services for one of two residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 76).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 76 revealed her diagnoses list included diabetes (high blood sugar) and polyneuropathy (nerve damage that can include pain, numbness, weakness, and coordination issues, often affecting the hands and feet). Documentation by the facility's contracted podiatry provider dated January 16, 2025, revealed that the practitioner assessed Resident 76's nails as thickened, that she had complaints of burning in both of her feet, and that her diagnoses included peripheral angiopathy (diseased blood vessels) and diabetes. Documentation by the facility's contracted podiatry provider dated May 27, 2025, revealed that the practitioner continued to assess Resident 76's nails as thickened, that she had complaints of burning in both of her feet, and that her diagnoses included peripheral angiopathy and diabetes. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to maintain a resident's continence status for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 19).Findings include: In an interview with Resident 19 on September 10, 2025, at 10:21 AM the resident indicated she was admitted to the facility without any history of being incontinent of her bowel or bladder and knows when she needs go to the bathroom but has since had several instances of being incontinent of bladder since her admission to the facility. Resident 19 indicated she has to wait a long time for staff at times on the evening or night shift to assist her to the bathroom and even started to ring her bell early to give the staff more time to get to her, but they don't always make it to her in time. Resident 19 also stated sometimes the staff come in and shut off her bell and say they will be back, but they don't come back and she pees the bed because of waiting. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory and tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed with a tracheostomy (Resident 42).Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Tracheostomy Care Policy, last reviewed without changes on June 4, 2025, revealed a purpose to guide tracheostomy care and the cleaning of reusable tracheostomy findings. Under the section titled, General Guidelines, the policy noted that a replacement tracheostomy tube must be available at the bedside at all times. Clinical record review for Resident 42 revealed a diagnosis list that included a tracheostomy (trach, an artificial opening through which a medical tube is placed through the front of the neck into the airway to facilitate breathing). Review of the current physician orders for Resident 42 revealed orders for daily and as needed tracheostomy care that included changing the inner cannula. Further review of the physician orders revealed an order that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of financial accounting records, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to assist a resident with financial matters for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 22).Findings include: Interview with Resident 22 on September 9, 2025, at 12:49 PM revealed that he did not believe that he had any money in a personal account, that he did not receive a statement, and that he did not know where any personal allowance funds were maintained. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 10, 2025, at 2:30 PM confirmed that Resident 22 entered the facility following his release from prison, and the facility determined that he had no resources. The surveyor requested Resident 22's financial accounting (e.g., monthly charges and payments for those charges) since his admission to the facility. The interview confirmed that Resident 22 had no designated responsible party. Resident 22 was his own responsible party; therefore, there would be no other individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical documentation for one of 24 residents reviewed for clinical documentation issues (Resident 44; Residents 34 and 122).Findings include: Review of Resident 44's clinical record revealed a section of the electronic health record (EHR) where various documents are uploaded to the medical record for staff to review as needed. Further review of this section for Resident 44 revealed that scans for two other residents, Residents 34 and 122, were uploaded to Resident 44's clinical record. The following documents were erroneously uploaded to Resident 44's medical record: A POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form for Resident 122 that had an upload and effective date of July 21, 2025. A medication clarification notice for Resident 34 that was dated July 25, 2025. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were informed of the findings on September 10, 2025, at 2:30 PM. The facility failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's change in condition requiring interventions for one of five residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed nursing documentation dated March 1, 2025, at 9:35 PM that indicated he was unable to swallow. A nursing progress note dated March 2, 2025, at 10:11 AM indicated that Resident CR1's medications were not given because it was not safe due to him not responding. A nursing progress note dated March 2, 2025, at 11:32 AM revealed that Resident CR1's daughter called and wanted updates on the resident. The resident was assessed by the documenting nurse and indicated his vital signs were within normal limits, his heart rate (HR) was regular, and he had no edema. His feet were cool to touch, and he had coarse lung sounds. He was mouth breathing. His HR was 98 beats per minute, his temperature was 96.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and his blood pressure was unable to be obtained. The daughter declined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical records for one of five residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident CR1 on February 14, 2025, for a respite (a short stay to give his caregiver a break from their responsibility) stay. Review of the admission orders provided by Resident CR1's physician from the community, revealed that he was to have his blood sugar monitored four to five times a day. Review of Resident CR1's physician orders revealed that the order for his blood sugar checks never got transcribed to his physician orders on admission and his blood sugars were not being monitored. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 6, 2025, at 12:30 PM confirmed the above noted findings related to Resident CR1's order to monitor his blood sugars. The facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for Resident CR1. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment on two of two nursing units (upper level nursing unit and lower level nursing unit; Resident 53) and failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 60 and 102). Findings include: Observation of the upper-level nursing unit shower room on October 25, 2024, at 8:30 AM revealed the following: A shower gurney had a build-up of a dry, white substance and a used resident brief underneath the layer of padding. A handrail located in a resident shower stall was loose and the wall tile was cracked where the handrail met the wall. The above information for the upper-level nursing unit shower room was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 25, 2024, at 12:06 PM. Observation of the lower-level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to residents or the residents' responsible parties for five of 13 residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Residents 17, 65, 62, 80, and 83). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was transferred to the hospital on September 28, 2024, after she had a change in condition. There was no documentation available that the facility provided written notice regarding a bed hold to the resident and the resident's responsible party upon transfer out to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 65 was transferred to the hospital on September 8, 2024, after he had a change in condition. There was no documentation available that the facility provided written notice regarding a bed hold to the resident and the resident's responsible party upon transfer out to the hospital. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed these findings for Residents 17 and 65 on October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered weights and medications for three of 20 residents (Residents 22, 72, and 75). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed physician orders for staff to administer and complete the following: From August 4, 2023, to September 14, 2024, daily weight every night shift for weight monitoring. Notify physician if given or if weight was greater than 213 (pounds). On September 14, 2024, daily weight every night shift for weight monitoring. Notify physician if given or if weight was greater than 186 (pounds). Both of Resident 22's weight orders indicated that if there was a weight change of greater than 2 pounds in 24 hours or greater than 5 pounds in a week staff were to refer to Resident 22's as needed (PRN) Bumex order for administration. Further review of Resident 22's physician orders revealed the following: From June 13, 2024, to August 12, 2024, Bumex 2 mg (milligrams) PO every 24 hours PRN for weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the application of physician ordered supplemental oxygen consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's plan of care, for two of two residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen concerns (Residents 47 and 83). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 47 revealed an active physician order dated September 12, 2023, for staff to apply supplemental oxygen at 5 liters per minute (lpm) via a cool mist trach collar (air compressor pushes room or oxygenated air through a bottle of sterile water to add moisture to the administered air that is administered through the collar over the tracheostomy tube (artificial opening through which a tube is placed through the front of the neck into the airway to facilitate breathing) to help thin secretions and improve the ability to breathe), titrate (adjust the liter flow) for SPO2 (pulse oximeter, or pulse ox, works by shining a light through the skin and determining the amount of oxygen based on how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, employee files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of resident tracheostomy, peg tube, and catheter care for four of five employees reviewed (Employees 12, 13, 14, and 15). Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had five residents with urinary catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), one resident with a tracheostomy (a surgical airway management procedure that consists of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea), and two residents with peg tubes (medical procedure in which a tube is passed into resident's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding). A request for staff competencies for tracheostomy, peg tube, and catheter care revealed the facility was unable to provide them. Further interview with the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection for two of two nursing units (Upper and Lower nursing units, Residents 5, 22, 31, 77, 54, 80, 85, and 47) Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality, Safety, and Oversight Group memo QSO-24-08-NH dated March 20, 2024, entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in Nursing Homes (NH), revealed the following: EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident activities, EBP are indicated for residents with an infection or colonization with a CDC (Centers for Disease Control) targeted MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism) when contact precautions do not otherwise apply or any wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (a pathway of pathogens in the environment to enter the body and cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 2, 3, and 4). Findings include: During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on October 23, 2024, at 2:21 PM the surveyor asked for training records to indicate that nurse aides had received at least 12 hours of in-service training in the last year for Employees 2, 3, and 4 (nurse aides). Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 25, 2023, at 11:41 AM confirmed there was no documented evidence that the above employees received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. 483.95(g) Required in-service training for nurse aides. Previously cited deficiency 11/17/23 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (7) Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to refuse or discontinue advance directive treatment for one of four residents reviewed for advance directive concerns (Resident 80). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 80 revealed a POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) signed by a physician on August 18, 2022, that indicated Resident 80 wanted comfort measures only and should not have hydration or nutrition via a tube. The form did not include a resident or resident representative signature but indicated that verbal consent was obtained via telephone conversation with Resident 80's responsible party. A living will document scanned into Resident 80's electronic medical record signed by Resident 80 on December 1, 2005, designated his responsible party as the agent to carry out his wishes as necessary. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notification timely to a resident whose payment coverage changed for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 65). Findings include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care received from the skilled nursing facility is ending; and how to contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. The provider must ensure that the beneficiary or their representative signs and dates the NOMNC to demonstrate that the beneficiary or their representative received the notice and understands the termination of services can be disputed. If the provider is personally unable to deliver a NOMNC to a person acting on behalf of an enrollee, then the provider should telephone the representative to advise him or her when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to maintain the highest practicable well-being for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 68 and 98). Findings Include: Observation and concurrent interview of Resident 68 on [DATE], at 2:10 PM revealed the resident had an indwelling foley catheter (a device that is inserted into the bladder and drains urine to an external collection bag). The resident's foley catheter drainage collection bag was observed hanging off the dresser located next to the resident's bed. Physician documentation for Resident 68 dated [DATE], revealed the resident had chronic retention of urine with a foley catheter. Current physician orders for Resident 68 revealed the following orders related to the foley catheter: Change the foley catheter and drainage bag monthly and as needed every night shift every one month starting on the 18th and as needed for leaking dated [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide shaving support for residents requiring staff assistance for two of two residents sampled for activities of daily living (Residents 65 and 85). Findings include: Observation of Resident 85 on October 22, 2024, at 10:19 AM and October 23, 2024, at 11:21 AM revealed he had several days of facial hair growth on his face. Resident 85 was unable to be interviewed related to his shaving preference due to his current cognitive status. Clinical record review for Resident 85 revealed his admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific interval to determine care needs) dated September 24, 2024, revealed nursing staff assessed him as dependent on staff for his personal hygiene (including shaving). The facility failed to provide Resident 85 shaving assistance. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 25, 2024, at 11:13 AM confirmed the findings for Resident 85.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to apply a physician ordered splint for one of two residents reviewed for range of motion concerns (Resident 47). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 47 revealed an active physician order dated June 28, 2024, that instructed staff to apply a left grip splint in the morning and remove the splint in the evening. A plan of care initiated by the facility on July 22, 2019, to address Resident 47's inability to perform activities of daily living independently related to intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture caused by brain damage that occurs most often before birth), and impaired mobility, indicated that Resident 47 had contractures (abnormal positioning of a joint) of the left wrist and fingers for which staff were to apply a left grip splint with morning care and remove with evening care. Observation of Resident 47 on the following dates and times revealed that staff did not apply the left-hand splint.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a residents' need for bed rails, assess risk for entrapment from bed rails, and obtain informed consent before installation of bed rails for two of five residents reviewed for potential accident hazards (Residents 60 and 80). Findings include: The surveyor requested the facility's policies and procedures related to the use of bed rails during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on October 24, 2024, at 2:15 PM. The two-page information provided by the facility on October 25, 2024, included a Bed Safety Audit procedure that indicated nursing and maintenance are responsible for conducting Bed Safety Audits. Nursing will follow policy and associated procedures to determine if side rails are clinically indicated. A Bed Entrapment Grid document indicated that the facility identified seven zones of potential resident entrapment as follows: Zone 1, within the rail Zone 2, between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by two of three residents reviewed (Residents 45 and 65). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 45 revealed the facility admitted her on July 26, 2022, with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 45's most recent significant change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated December 1, 2023, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 78 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 45's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate response to consultant pharmacist recommendations for one of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Resident 65). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 65 revealed a consultant pharmacist report dated December 4, 2023, requesting the facility evaluate if Resident 65's as needed (PRN) Atarax (antihistamine medication) could be discontinued due to nonuse. Resident 65's physician agreed to the recommendation and staff noted the change on December 6, 2024. Review of Resident 65's physician orders revealed an active order since January 30, 2023, for Atarax 25 milligrams(mg), one tablet every eight hours as needed for itching. Interview with the Director of Nursing on October 25, 2024, at 9:08 AM confirmed the facility failed to respond appropriately to Resident 65's December 4, 2023, pharmacy recommendation, and discontinued his Atarax only after surveyor's questioning. 28 Pa. Code 211.9 (k) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure and account for resident medications and biologicals on one of two nursing units (Upper Level Nursing Unit, Resident 68). Findings include: Observation of Resident 68's room on October 22, 2024, at 2:06 PM revealed the resident was sitting on the edge of the bed. A white, round pill was observed on the floor next to the resident's bed. The resident was unsure where the pill had come from. An interview with Employee 5, licensed practical nurse (LPN), on October 22, 2024, at 2:14 PM revealed the LPN was unable to identify the pill other than the pill was scored. The LPN proceeded to dispose of the medication found on Resident 68's floor. The facility failed to properly secure resident medications as evidenced by an unknown pill found on Resident 68's floor. The above information was reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on October 23, 2024, at 3:16 PM. Observation of a medication administration pass with Employee 5 on October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine dental services for two of five residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 65 and 80). Findings include: Observation of Resident 65 on October 22, 2024, at 11:20 AM revealed that Resident 65 had several broken teeth. Resident 65 was unable to be interviewed due to his current cognitive status. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted him November 18, 2022, with payment sources that included the state Medicaid benefit. Further review of Resident 65's clinical record revealed that he last saw a dentist on January 10, 2024. A review of this progress note revealed that Resident 65's broken teeth were asymptomatic at that time, and he would be due for his next visit for prophylactic dental cleaning in six months. An interview with Employee 8 (social worker) on October 25, 2024, at 10:46 AM confirmed these findings for Resident 65 and had no further information to indicate that Resident 65 was offered routine dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received the pneumococcal immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 96). Findings include: Review of the policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine Guidelines, last reviewed without changes in August 2024, revealed that the facility will offer residents the pneumococcal vaccine to aid in preventing pneumococcal infections as applicable per physician order. The procedure noted that previous immunization information will be requested during the pre-admission process. A representative from the admissions office/designee will obtain and forward copies of the immunization records to the admitting nurse. Verify the data with the resident and/or authorized representative when applicable. The pre-admission immunizations will be added to the electronic immunization record/EMR. The immunization record/EMR will be updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer, or provide education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects with the COVID vaccine for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 96). Findings include: Review of the policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Administration, last reviewed in August 2024, indicated that, The facility will offer and administer COVID-19 vaccinations in accordance with state and federal guidelines. The vaccination schedule in the policy noted, The COVID vaccination schedules for people who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised and people who are moderately or severely immunocompromised should be consulted for age-specific information. Clinical record review for Resident 96 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the immunizations for Resident 96 revealed no evidence of a COVID vaccination for the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe and clean environment in the facility main laundry area located on the lower level. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main laundry area on October 25, 2024, between 8:40 AM to 8:55 AM revealed the following: A soiled linen room that contained a large laundry bin on wheels with an extensive build-up of debris in the bottom that included paper products, dirt, balled up gloves, and at least two washcloths. An active vent blowing air into the soiled area had an extensive build-up of dust on it. A commode with no lid on the bowl had debris and paper products discarded in the bowl. Three pillows and other items were set on top of the lidless bowl. There were multiple cobwebs hanging from the ceiling at the perimeter where the ceiling met the wall. The clean linen area of the laundry had a ceiling tile missing next to a fluorescent light fixture that was powered off. There were multiple pipes and wires visible. At least three ceiling tiles had large brown colored water stains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and resident responsible party and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to resolve resident grievances related to respect, incontinence issues, and resident safety for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the facility Concern Forms for the month of December 2023, revealed the Log for December 2023, had 5 concern forms submitted related to Resident 1. Review of the Resident Concern reports related to Resident 1 revealed that all 5 were filed by her daughter/responsible party. Review of the concern forms for Resident 1, filed by her daughter/responsible party revealed the following: December 12, 2023, Concern form filed related to the resident being in pants all day that had a dried urine mark on them suggesting that they did not put her in dry pants all day. The form indicated the findings and disposition that a toileting program would be evaluated, and a family meeting scheduled. The investigation was completed by Employee 1 (Social services) on December 14, 2023. The form was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units reviewed (Upper and Lower Nursing Units; Residents 18, 25, 35, 47, 63, 68, 72, 85, 86, 97, 101, 102, and 112). Findings include: Observation of the Upper Nursing Unit on November 14, 2023, at 9:50 AM in the hallway where north and south halls intersect revealed the floor had gray and tan stains. The lower section of north hall revealed the walls had scuff marks. A build-up of debris was on the floor edges and continued there when observed at 11:30 AM. Observation and interview with Resident 63 on November 14, 2023, at 11:11 AM revealed the resident reporting having the coldest room in the home. There was a draft from his window. The surveyor informed Employee 3, nurse aide, who put a sweatshirt on Resident 63. Employee 3 indicated that this room is often colder. Concurrent observation of Resident 63's nightstand revealed the side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, employee personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its abuse prohibition policy pertaining to screening for five of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employees 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9). Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Employment Screenings for Potential Hires: Pennsylvania, last reviewed July 21, 2023, revealed for applicants who have not resided in Pennsylvania for the two years prior to the application or who currently live in another state, the facilty will obtain a report from the FBI using the FBI fingerprint card criminal history check process. This will be completed within 90 days of hire. A review of Employee 1's, maintenance director, personnel record revealed that the facility hired him on July 25, 2023. There was no documented evidence in Employee 1's personnel record that the facility obtained an attestation of Pennsylvania residency or completed an FBI check. A review of Employee 6's, activities, personnel record revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary for two of three discharged residents reviewed (Residents 114 and 117). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident 114 revealed nursing documentation dated [DATE], at 9:08 AM that indicated she was discharged to the hospital as of [DATE]. Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 114 was discharged to the hospital because she returned from a leave of absence with family on [DATE], at 3:21 PM and they indicated that she had a fall and complained of right hip pain. A new order was received at 3:47 PM for an X-ray to be completed as soon as possible on the right hip and pelvis. A progress note dated [DATE], at 11:29 PM indicated that the X-ray results revealed an acute right femoral neck fracture. An order was received to transfer her to the ER. Interview with the Director of Nursing on [DATE], at 2:45 PM revealed that Resident 114 was discharged to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary condition in the main kitchen and lower level pantry. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on November 14, 2023, at 9:12 AM with Employee 10 (food service director) revealed the following: The floor in the kitchen was dirty with numerous black sticky spots from spillage, dried food messes, and trash on the floor. The sink in the food prep area had the following items stored underneath: a tub of peanut butter, a box of potato pearls, a container of jelly, a jug of vinegar and Worcestershire sauce, a container of vanilla, and two trays of spices. The jug of Worcestershire sauce expired on August 26, 2023. There was no date on the container of vanilla. There was a dirty towel on the floor in the dish room. There was a tray with dirty oatmeal bowls in the food prep area. The trash can by the paper products was overflowing and had no lid on it. The above findings were reviewed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices during medication administration to prevent potential spread of infection on one of three residents observed for medication administration (Resident 113) Findings include: Observation of a medication administration pass on November 16, 2023, at 8:35 AM with Employee 12, Licensed Practical Nurse, revealed her administering Systane ophthalmic drops (eye drops used to treat dry eyes) 0.6%, one drop in each eye to Resident 113. Employee 12 administered Resident 113's oral medications and then proceeded to administer the eye drops. She administered the eye drops with no gloves on. Concurrent interview with Employee 12 confirmed the above noted findings that she did not don gloves prior to administering Resident 113's eye drops. Interview with the Director of Nursing on November 16, 2023, at 12:50 PM confirmed that Employee 12 should have donned gloves to administer Resident 113's eye drops. The facility failed to implement proper infection control practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 85). Findings include: Interview with Employee 14, Registered Nurse assessment Coordinator (RNAC), on November 16, 2023, at 2:37 PM confirmed that the facility follows the guidelines from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid's (CMS) Resident Assessment Instruction (RAI) for completing the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, an assessment tool utilized to determine resident care needs). Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (reference used to complete an MDS) revealed that the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. Clinical record review for Resident 85 revealed a quarterly MDS dated [DATE], that indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, regarding skin assessments, for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 110). Findings include: The policy entitled Skin Integrity, last reviewed July 21, 2023, revealed the facility will develop a routine to review residents with wounds, or if they are at risk on a weekly basis. Clinical record review for Resident 40 revealed nursing documentation dated November 1, 2023, at 3:30 PM indicating staff noted an open area to her right buttock measuring 1.5 centimeters (cm) by 1.5 cm. There was no documentation that the facility assessed Resident 40's wound weekly until the surveyor questioned them on November 15, 2023. Clinical record review for Resident 110 revealed wound physician documentation dated November 2, 2023, noting Resident 110's pressure wound of the right heel measured 0.6 cm by 1.0 cm. There was no further documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and evaluate interventions to prevent fall reoccurrence for one of nine residents reviewed for falls (Resident 82). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Resident Accidents and Injuries, last reviewed without changes on July 21, 2023, revealed a purpose to ensure all incidents involving a resident are reported, documented, and an investigation initiated after the incident is identified. An incident is defined in the policy as .any happening that is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or the routine care of a particular resident. It may be an accident or a situation that could result in an accident. Clinical documentation for Resident 82 dated November 2, 2023, at 2:35 PM revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment was completed on October 23, 2023, that indicated the resident scored a score of six out of 15 and was not capable. Current care plan review revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store supplemental oxygen equipment per professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 25). Findings include: A review of a current diagnoses list for Resident 25 revealed the resident is dependent on supplemental oxygen. A current physician's order for Resident 25 dated May 10, 2023, instructed staff to administer oxygen via nasal cannula (medical tubing with two nasal prongs used to deliver supplemental oxygen into the nose) continuously at two liters per minute. The current care plan for Resident 25 revealed that the resident is at risk for respiratory failure due to the medical history. Observation of Resident 25 on November 14, 2023, at 11:00 AM revealed the resident's electric wheelchair was in the hallway outside of the resident's room. A nasal cannula was draped over the back of the wheelchair. The nasal cannula was not bagged or protected from the ambient environment. Observation of Resident 25 on November 14, 2023, at 1:33 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received an annual performance review for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4 and 5). Findings Include: During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 15, 2023, at 3:00 PM the surveyor asked for annual performance reviews for Employees 3, 4, and 5. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the employees have been employed for at least a year. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on November 17, 2023, at 11:15 AM confirmed there was no documented evidence that annual performance reviews were completed for the above employees. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (2) Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 40 and 113). Findings include: Observation of a medication administration pass on November 16, 2023, at 8:35 AM revealed Employee 12, Licensed Practical Nurse, administered Vitamin D 50 micrograms (mcg) one tablet to Resident 113. Clinical record review for Resident 113 revealed his current order was for Vitamin D 25 mcg, not 50 mcg. Interview with Employee 12 on November 16, 2023, at 10:09 AM confirmed that Resident 113 should have only received 25 mcg of Vitamin D. She indicated that she did give 50 mcg because the lids on the stock bottles of Vitamin D, the 25 mcg and the 50 mcg, got switched. Observation of both bottles of Vitamin D, at this time, revealed that the bottle of Vitamin D 25 mcg had 1000 written with black marker on the lid of the bottle and the Vitamin D 50 mcg had 2000 written on the lid in black marker. Employee 12 confirmed that staff labeled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for timely podiatry (foot doctor) services for three of four residents reviewed for podiatry services (Residents 35, 63, and 107). Findings include: Observation of Resident 35 on November 15, 2023, at 8:59 AM revealed he was lying in bed. His toenails were of unequal length, discolored, and a nail on the right foot was long. Review of a podiatry consultation for Resident 35 dated August 11, 2023, revealed that the resident has onychomycosis (thickened and discolored nails from a fungal infection, trimming nails is often a treatment). His toenails were trimmed and debrided (removal of diseased toenail bed). The resident was to have a podiatry follow up in nine weeks. There was no documented evidence that another podiatry consultation was completed on or after October 13, 2023 (nine weeks). Observation and interview with Resident 63 on November 15, 2023, at 2:10 PM revealed that his toenails were very long over the edges of his toes. Review of a podiatry consultation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an integrated care plan that included services provided by Hospice and those provided by the facility for two of two residents reviewed for Hospice concerns (Residents 9 and 30). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed the facility admitted her to hospice services on October 16, 2023. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 15, 2023, at 3:00 PM the surveyor was informed that Hospice documentation was located in binders at the nursing stations. During an interview with Employee 13, licensed practical nurse, and Employee 15, nurse aide, on November 16, 2023, at 12:03 PM it was revealed that they never know in advance when Hospice staff visits and provides care for Resident 9 and that the resident could have been washed by facility staff for the day and then the Hospice aide comes in and does it again. Review of the Hospice binder for Resident 9 revealed a calendar in the front of the notebook that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received 12 hours of in-service training annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4, and 5). Findings include: During a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 15, 2023, at 3:00 PM the surveyor asked for training records to indicate that nurse aides had received at least 12 hours of in-service training in the last year for Employees 3, 4, and 5. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on November 17, 2023, at 11:15 AM confirmed there was no documented evidence that the above employees received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(1-6)(d) Staff development
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs regarding the accessibility to a call bell for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Observation on August 8, 2023, at 2:25 PM revealed Resident 1 was sitting in the middle of her room in her wheelchair. The call bell cord was draped across the bed in the opposite direction of Resident 1, with the call bell button facing the window. The call bell was out of Resident 1's reach. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 8, 2023, at 2:27 PM confirmed the above observation. The Director of Nursing repositioned the call bell in Resident 1's reach and asked her to demonstrate how to use the call bell. Resident 1 was able to grasp the call bell and push the red button, which activated her call light. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an abuse prohibition policy pertaining to investigation of potential neglect for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The policy entitled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed on June 23, 2023, indicates that the facility will conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation. The policy defines neglect as failure to provide goods or services that is required for a resident. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated April 25, 2023, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 2 as needing the extensive assistance of two caregivers for transferring. Nursing documentation dated May 9, 2023, at 2:18 PM indicated that Resident 2 is using a stand up lift for transfers. Nursing documentation dated May 12, 2023, at 11:37 AM indicated that nursing staff was heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, regarding skin assessments, interventions, and treatments for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include: The policy entitled Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines, last reviewed on June 23, 2023, indicates that the facility will implement evidence-based interventions for residents who are assessed at being at risk of developing pressure sores. Interventions will be documented in the care plan. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted her on June 26, 2023. Nursing documentation dated June 26, 2023, indicated that nursing staff assessed her bilateral heels as being boggy, possibly indicating pressure damage. There was no documented evidence to indicate the facility implemented an intervention to address Resident 1's boggy heels. A Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to obtain lab services as ordered by the physician for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Nursing documentation dated July 8, 2023, at 5:47 PM indicated that Resident 1's responsible party wanted Resident 1's urine tested for an infection. The facility contacted Resident 1's physician and obtained an order for a urine culture and for Resident 1 to start an antibiotic while the culture was pending. Review of Resident 1's urine culture dated July 10, 2023, indicated that the lab noted Resident 1's urine was growing multiple organisms and that the culture was most likely contaminated. The laboratory recommended the facility obtain another urine sample from Resident 1 for testing. Resident 1's culture results dated July 10, 2023, had writing on it indicating urine to be collected for culture only today dated July 10, 2023. There was no signature as to who wrote it. A physician's order was obtained and entered into Resident 1's clinical record on July 10, 2023, for nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-17 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident and/or their responsible party in writing that included the required contents, of a transfer to the hospital for six out of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 40, 67, 72, 110, 112, and 114). Findings include: A review of Resident 110's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred her to the hospital on May 10, 2023, due to sepsis (an infection of the blood stream). There was no documented evidence to indicate that the facility provided a written notice to Resident 110's responsible party regarding his transfer to the hospital that included the required contents: reason for the transfer, effective date of the transfer, location to which the resident was transferred to, contact and address (mailing and email) information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and information (mailing and email address and telephone number) for the agency responsible for the protection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,765 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $13,575 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
- $8,190 — penalty dated 2023-11-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $337K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395825. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.