Riverstreet Manor
440 North River Street, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702 · For profit - Corporation · 122 certified beds · (570) 825-5611 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.0% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.26 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.1%CMS range 47.1–61.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.5–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.0–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 112.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-10-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, facility investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing care with the required assistance of two staff members as planned to ensure safety and prevent major injuries. As a result, one resident (Resident 1) sustained multiple subdural hematomas and closed nasal fracture requiring hospital evaluation, representing actual harm for one resident out of one sampled for abuse prohibition.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol, last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. It is the policy of the facility, as part of the strategy to prevent abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, documentation provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement abuse prevention procedures to protect one resident out of ten residents reviewed (Resident 7) following allegations of sexual abuse perpetrated by a facility employee (Employee 2, nurse aide). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation Prevention Program, last reviewed by the facility on May 1, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy that residents have the right to be free from abuse. The policy indicated the resident abuse prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: protect residents from any further harm during investigations. A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigation, last reviewed by the facility on May 1, 2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a timely and comprehensive skin assessment was completed upon readmission to identify and evaluate an existing pressure injury and guide treatment interventions for one of seven sampled residents reviewed for skin integrity concerns (Resident A1).Findings include:According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies, clinical records, resident assessments, grievance documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized bowel and bladder incontinence management program for one of seven residents reviewed for the timely provision of staff assistance with toileting and management of urinary and bowel incontinence (Resident B2).Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Urinary Continence and Incontinence Assessment and Management reviewed by the facility on May 1, 2026, revealed the staff and practitioner will appropriately screen form, and manage individuals with urinary incontinence. As part of the initial and ongoing assessments, the nursing staff and physician will screen for information related to urinary incontinence. Periodically, as required and when there is a change in voiding, staff will define each individual's level of continence, referring to criteria in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). If the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department, including the main kitchen and a nursing unit pantry (Station 2), to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevented contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of facility policies entitled Sanitation, last reviewed May 1, 2025, indicated that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of scheduled mealtimes, resident council meeting minutes, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were consistently offered a nutritious evening snack when more than 14 hours elapsed between the substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, for 5 of 5 residents reviewed who expressed a desire for a bedtime snack (Residents 10, 53, 9, 65, and 105).Findings include: A review of scheduled facility mealtimes revealed the interval between the substantial evening meal and breakfast exceeded 14 hours across multiple resident care areas. Dinner was served between 4:40 PM and 5:15 PM, and breakfast was served between 7:35 AM and 8:15 AM the following morning, resulting in overnight intervals ranging from 14 hours 55 minutes to 15 hours, as follows: Pine Hall: Dinner 4:40 PM, Breakfast 7:35 AM (14 hours 55 minutes)Oak Hall: Dinner 4:55 PM, Breakfast 7:50 AM (14 hours 55 minutes)Willow Hall: Dinner 5:05 PM, Breakfast 8:05 AM (15 hours)Spruce Hall: Dinner 5:15 PM, Breakfast 8:15 AM (15 hours) When more than 14 hours elapse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it conducted required quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings and failed to ensure the attendance of the Medical Director or a physician designated by the Medical Director at required quarterly QAPI meetings for two of four quarters reviewed (Quarters 3 and 4 of 2025).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed May 1, 2025, revealed the facility established a QAPI program (a facility-wide program that uses ongoing review of data and care practices to identify problems, correct them, and improve the quality and safety of services provided to residents). The policy indicated the program would be comprehensive, ongoing, and address the full range of services and departments. However, the policy did not specify the required participation of the Medical Director or a physician designated by the Medical Director and did not outline expectations for attendance or accountability for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate duration and clinical rationale for an as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication order and failed to document the use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 56). Findings include: Federal requirements for the use of psychotropic medications expect that psychotropic medications are used only when necessary to treat a specific, documented condition. The requirements further limit PRN psychotropic medication orders to 14 days unless the prescriber documents a clinical rationale for continued use and specifies the duration of the extended order. Non-pharmacological interventions are approaches that do not involve medications, such as verbal reassurance, redirection, environmental adjustments, or comfort measures, and are expected to be attempted and documented when clinically appropriate prior to the use of a PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop an individualized baseline care plan that addressed a resident's immediate needs and documented treatment preferences, including comfort-focused care and avoidance of hospital transfer when appropriate, for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 56).Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Care Plans -Baseline last updated on May 1, 2025, revealed that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight hours of admission. The policy indicated the immediate needs to be addressed in the baseline care plan include but are not limited to initial goals, physician orders, and interventions to meet the resident's needs. Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by underlying metabolic disturbances, leading to symptoms like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of observations, clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident from exiting the facility without authorization (elopement) for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 28).Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Wandering and Elopements, last reviewed May 1, 2025, revealed it was the policy of the facility to identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and will strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. The policy defined elopement as a resident leaving the premises or a safe area without authorization. Clinical record review revealed Resident 28 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including localization-related symptomatic epilepsy (a seizure disorder that begins in one area of the brain and may spread) and essential thrombocythemia (a condition in which the body produces too many platelets, increasing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to monitor and manage hydration status in accordance with a physician-ordered fluid restriction to ensure proper fluid balance for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 39).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Fluid Restriction Policy, last reviewed May 1, 2025, indicated the facility will provide an appropriate amount of fluid to residents who have a prescribed physician order for fluid restriction. The policy further stated that when a fluid restriction (a medical order that limits the total amount of liquids a resident may consume within a specified time period, usually over 24 hours, to prevent complications such as fluid overload, which is excess fluid in the body, or worsening heart or kidney conditions) is ordered by the physician, the clinical nutrition staff will coordinate with nursing for a 24-hour distribution of the daily allowance of fluids for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, select facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement and adhere to procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use-by dates for multi-dose medications in two of two medication rooms (Station 1 Medication Room, and Station 2 Medication Room).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed by the facility on May 1, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility that if a multidose vial ( container of medication intended for use in more than one dose for multiple administrations, which contains a preservative to reduce bacterial growth and requires labeling with the date opened and adherence to manufacturer storage and beyond-use guidelines) of injectable medication has been opened or accessed (e.g., needle puncture) the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the opened vial. An observation of the medication room in Station 2 Med Room on April 15, 2026, at 8:53 AM, in the presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies, clinical records, grievances filed with the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make prompt and adequate efforts to resolve a resident grievance in accordance with facility policy, for one of ten residents sampled (Resident 1).Findings Include: A review of facility policy entitled Grievance Process Procedure last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and or resident representative. The policy indicated a resolution of the concern is desired within five (5) working days from the date the concern was filed. The policy indicated routine follow up on concerns that are outstanding will be completed through the morning process meeting. The policy further identified the grievance official as the Nursing Home administrator (NHA). A grievance is defined as a formal or informal complaint or concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was revealed that the facility failed to assure that one of 10 residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors. (Resident 1)Findings include: A review of a facility policy, entitled Reconciliation of Medications on Admission last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, defined the medication reconciliation process as the process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list of both prescriptions. The policy further detailed the steps in completing a medication reconciliation which included gathering the information needed to reconcile the medication list by using the approved medication reconciliation form, the discharge summary from the referring facility, the admission order sheet, and all prescription and supplement information obtained from the resident/family during the medication history. The policy further explained that the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 resident shower areas in the facility and maintain a clean and safe outdoor smoking area Findings include: On October 21, 2025, at 1:00 P.M., observations of the Area 145 shower/bathroom revealed multiple items stored inappropriately within resident bathing areas, including two shower chair buckets, a mechanical lift sling, a pair of sneakers, and an open plastic bag of briefs placed inside the bathtub. The bathtub's waterspout was coated with a thick layer of dried white residue. In the first shower stall, the perimeter of the floor was coated with a black, sticky substance. The floor surface showed visible soil and buildup. A stainless-steel soap dispenser on the wall exhibited visible streaks and brown discoloration, and the ceiling vent was layered with lint. The air conditioning/heating ceiling unit also had visible accumulations of dust and debris. The shower bed in the second shower stall was observed with a white powdery film and areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-21 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement its established smoking policy to ensure resident safety. The facility failed to post the smoking policy in a conspicuous and legible manner, failed to ensure that required smoking safety equipment was available in the designated smoking area, and failed to ensure smoking materials were properly secured for nine residents who smoke (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10).Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Facility Smoking Policy, last reviewed May 2, 2025, revealed that smoking be permitted only in designated areas that are separate from resident care areas, well ventilated, and equipped with portable fire extinguishers. The policy identified the designated smoking location as the courtyard accessible through the door near the laundry and outside the Station 1 dayroom, prohibited oxygen use in smoking areas, and required that residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain food delivery equipment in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential food contamination for four of four food delivery carts observed (Pine, Oak, Willow, and Spruce hallways).Findings include: Safe food handling and sanitation standards established by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require all equipment and utensils used in the storage, preparation, and delivery of food to be kept clean and in good repair. Equipment must undergo a two-step process consisting of cleaning (removal of visible soil and debris) and sanitizing (application of heat or chemical solution to reduce microorganisms that may cause illness). Harmful bacteria that cause foodborne illness cannot be seen, smelled, or tasted; therefore, strict adherence to cleaning and sanitizing procedures is required to prevent contamination. On October 21, 2025, the following observations were made during meal service: At 11:45 AM, the stainless-steel food delivery cart on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) consistently received necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and dignity for two residents out of 24 sampled residents (Residents 25 and 60). Findings include: A review of Resident 25's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that cause symptoms of tremors, rigidity, and postural instability), and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated May 12, 2025, indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for showering/bathing. The resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement individualized pain management programs, consistent with professional standards of practice, to meet the pain management needs and attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for two residents out of 24 reviewed (Resident 37 and Resident 98). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Interagency Task Force, Executive Summary Draft Final Report May 6, 2021, for Pain Management Best Practices the development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis with measurable outcomes that focus on improvements including quality of life (QOL), improved functionality, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Achieving excellence in acute and chronic pain care depends on the following: An emphasis on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's scheduled mealtimes, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide snacks as desired by residents, including experiences reported by seven of seven residents participating in a group interview (Residents 8, 11, 80, 67, 37, 44, and 50). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Snacks, last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy that snacks and beverages will be provided as identified in residents' individual plans of care. Bedtime (HS- hour of sleep) snacks will be provided for all residents. Additional snacks and beverages will be available upon request for all residents who want to eat at non-traditional times. Nursing services is responsible for delivering the individual snacks to the identified residents and for offering evening snacks to all other residents. During a resident group interview conducted on June 25, 2025, at 10:00 AM, seven residents in attendance (Residents 8, 11, 80, 67, 37, 44, and 50) stated that snacks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier infection control procedures and failed to ensure the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident out of 23 residents sampled (Resident 93). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, revealed it is the facility policy to expand the use of personal protective equipment and refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. The policy indicated gown and gloves are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity. A clinical record review revealed Resident 93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot effectively filter waste…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses provided nursing services in accordance with professional standards of practice by not adhering to medication administration standards for 4 of 4 residents observed during the administration of medications. (Resident 30, 31, 37, and 44). Findings included: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21 section 21.11 Responsibilities of the Registered Nurse (RN) (a) The RN assesses human responses and plans, implements and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible. In carrying out this responsibility, (4) the registered nurse carries out nursing care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for the prescribed bowel protocol intended to promote normal bowel activity for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 49). Findings include: According to the American Academy of Family Physicians (The American Academy of Family Physicians is one of the largest medical organizations in the US founded to promote the science and art of family medicine) the primary goal of constipation management should be symptom improvement, and the secondary goal should be the passage of soft, formed stool without straining at least three times per week. The facility was unable to provide a written policy regarding bowel elimination management. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure (weakness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide colostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 81). Findings include: Review of the facility Colostomy/Ileostomy Care Policy last reviewed May 2, 2025, indicated it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents who require colostomy services receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, and to provide guidelines that will aid in preventing exposure of the resident's skin to fecal matter. A review of Resident 81's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included peritoneal abscess (a localization of pus or infected material within the peritoneal cavity) Chronic Kidney Stage 5(also known as end stage renal failure when the kidneys are no longer functional to support the body's needs) , Dependence on Renal dialysis ( a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for one out of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: A review of Resident 50's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, anxiety, malignant neoplasm of lung (cancerous tumors that form in lung tissue) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety, and uncontrollable thoughts about the event). The resident's current care plan, in effect at the time of review on June 24, 2025, did not identify the resident's PTSD triggers related to this diagnosis and resident specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the physician medication orders were signed in a timely manner, resulting in medication administration delays for one resident out of 24 reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Physician Services last reviewed by the facility on May 2, 2025, indicated that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a licensed physician. Supervising the medical care of resident incudes providing consultation or treatment when called by the facility, prescribing medications and therapy, and overseeing a relevant plan of care for the resident. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include polyneuropathy (medical condition where multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body become damaged or dysfunctional, resulting in numbness, tingling, burning sensations, weakness, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the provision of pharmacy services to assure the timely receipt and administration of physician-prescribed medications for one resident of 24 reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to build-up of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues), chronic obstructive disease (lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), and Type 2 diabetes (body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). During an interview on June 24, 2025, at 10:48 AM, Resident 49 reported ongoing constipation and described a recent incident of significant straining that led to the development of hemorrhoids and rectal bleeding. The resident stated, They're supposed to do suppositories or cream or something…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to store and label multi-dose medications in accordance with professional standards of practice and manufacturer instructions for one of three medication carts observed (Pine Hall). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications last reviewed by the facility May 2,2025, indicated that multi-use medication vials/bottles are labeled accordingly. The policy further revealed it is the nursing staff responsibility to maintain medication storage including proper labeling. An observation of the medication cart located on the Pine Hall unit, conducted on June 25, 2025, at 8:22 AM in the presence of Employee 2 (Registered Nurse), revealed one multi-dose insulin pen of Insulin Lispro (a fast-acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) and three multi-dose insulin pens of Insulin Glargine (a long-acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) that were opened and available for use but were not labeled with the date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two out of the 27 residents sampled (Residents 97 and 159) and experiences reported by five out of the seven residents during a resident group interview (Residents 38, 49, 53, 91, and 94). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hypertension and lymphedema (swelling caused by a build-up of lymph fluid in the body, usually in an arm or leg). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to plan care) dated, August 21, 2024, indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 11 (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a tool to assess the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and revised with the participation of the resident and the resident's representative for two residents out of 27 residents sampled (Residents 62 and 79) and five out of seven residents during a resident council interview (38, 49, 94, 91, and 53). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last reviewed by the facility on August 1, 2024, revealed that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy indicates that residents are informed of their right to participate in his or her treatment and provided advance notice of care planning conferences. Also, the policy indicates if the participation of the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in two of two resident pantries (Station 1 and Station 2). Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean, and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness, according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation of the Station One resident pantry on September 4, 2024, at 12:00 PM and September 5, 2024, at 1:45 PM revealed the interior of the microwave was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that in preparation for room change, a resident and resident representative received written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room was changed for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings Include: Federal regulatory guidelines note that moving to a new room or changing roommates is challenging for residents. A resident's preferences should be taken into account when considering such changes. When a resident is being moved at the request of facility staff, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must receive an explanation in writing of why the move is required. The resident should be provided the opportunity to see the new location, meet the new roommate, and ask questions about the move. Review of the clinical record of Resident 62 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately identify a resident's wishes for future health care and advance directives (a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) as evidenced by one resident (Resident 62) out of 27 residents sampled. Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 62, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke- damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area) with right side hemiparesis (partial paralysis on one side of the body). A POLST a medical order signed by a doctor (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment- is not intended to replace an advance health care directive document or other medical orders. The POLST process and health care decision-making works best when the person has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select facility incident reports, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an incident to rule out neglect and identify planned fall interventions not in place which resulted in a resident who requires the assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers to sustain a fall with a minor injury for one of 27 residents sampled (Resident 10). The findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy last revised May 1, 2021, and last reviewed August 2024, indicated the facility will do all that is within their control to prevent occurrences of abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for all residents. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for the consistent application of prescribed therapeutic devices and or preventative measures, neck positioning pillow, when in bed and chair, for one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 69) to assure the provision of person-centered care. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include traumatic subdural hemorrhage (blood collects between the layers of tissue that surround the brain) with loss of consciousness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, muscle disorder, and fracture of the base of the skull and occiput (flat bone that forms the back of the skull). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to identify specific resident care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care as prescribed to meet the current clinical needs, failed to ensure the ready availability of prescribed emergency supplies, and failed to follow physician orders for management of a midline catheter (long, thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein in the upper arm. It is used to deliver medications or fluid into the bloodstream) for one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 100). Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection, and Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Resistance (ESBL- a bacteria resistant to most antibiotics) in the urine. Review of Resident 100's hospital record Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Midline Insertion Documentation dated August 1, 2024, revealed the resident underwent a procedure for a single lumen midline catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, select facility policy, staff, and resident interviews, it was determined that facility failed to implement pain management interventions when a resident suffered pain without relief for one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 92). Findings include: A review of the policy title Pain-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed by the facility on August 1, 2024, revealed the physician and staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain. This includes reviewing known diagnoses and conditions that commonly cause pain. It also includes a review of any treatments that the resident is currently receiving for pain, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. The policy also indicates staff will identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated. With input from the resident to the extent possible, the physician and staff will establish goals for pain treatment. A clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to promote the mental and psychosocial well-being of one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 69) Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder, and intermittent explosive disorder. The resident's care plan, initiated August 5, 2020, indicated he is at risk for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to anxiety. A review of a nursing note dated April 9, 2024, at 1445 at 2:45 PM indicated the nurse entered the residents' room to give Prednisone (a medication that reduces inflammation and suppresses the immune system) and to start his J tube feeding (a soft, plastic tube placed through the skin of the abdomen into the midsection of the small intestine used to administer liquid nutrition). Resident 69 refused, and an attempt was made by a different nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and controlled medication records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting and administration of controlled medications and maintenance of accurate controlled substance records as evidenced by one resident of 27 sampled (Resident 99). Finding include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 99 had a physician order initially dated June 24, 2024, at 4:15 PM for Oxycodone HCl oral tablet 5 MG (an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), give 5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain 4-10 (numeric pain scale 1-10, 1 least pain, 10 most pain). A review of the Controlled Drug Administration Record accounting for the above narcotic medication revealed that on the following dates nursing staff signed for the removal of a dose from the resident's supply of Oxycodone 5 mg: August 21, 2024, at 6:00 PM, August 25, 2024, (time illegible), August (date illegible) at 11:45 PM, and August 28, 2024, at 8:00 PM, However, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the presence of current documented clinical necessity for use of an antipsychotic medication for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 68). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 8, 2024, revealed that Resident 68 is moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 8 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide emergency care consistent with a resident's advanced directives for one resident out of 14 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: According to the national library of medicine, irreversible death is classified as a person having the following: rigor mortis (stiffening of the joints and muscles of a body a few hours after death), dependent lividity (pooling of blood to dependent areas resulting in a red/purple coloration), decapitation (total separation of the head from the body), transection (cut in half), and decomposition (the state or process of rotting) A review of Resident CR1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cancer of the right lung, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and anxiety. A review of Resident CR1's clinical record revealed a physician order dated [DATE], identifying the resident was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards and obstacles for safe mobility and use of mobility assistance devices on one of two resident units (Station 2). Findings include: An observation on August 11, 2024, at 8:50 AM of the hallway leading to the therapy department from the main entrance of the facility revealed 4 large reclining/wheelchairs lined up against the right-hand side of the wall. The hallway leading down the resident care area revealed multiple high back chairs setting outside of resident rooms, causing congestion in the hallways. These items obstructed continued access to the handrails which are to be used for resident ambulation or mobility assistance and did not create a homelike environment. During an interview August 11, 2024, the Nursing Home Administrator stated that resident care areas should be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2.1) Management 28 Pa. Code 205.9 (c) Corridors
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure acceptable storage for medications on one of two nursing units observed (Station 1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Discontinued Medications, provided by the facility on August 11, 2024, revealed that discontinued medications are destroyed or returned to the issuing pharmacy in accordance with facility policy and state regulations. This policy refers to the policy entitled Discarding and Destroying Medications. A review of facility policy titled Discarding and Destroying Medications provided by the facility on August 11, 2024, revealed that individual resident medications supplied in sealed unopened containers may be returned to the issuing pharmacy for disposition provided that all such medications are identified as to lot or control number and the receiving pharmacist and a registered nurse employed by the facility sign a separate log that lists the resident's name; the name, strength, prescription number, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for three out of 14 residents reviewed. (Residents 7, 11, and 14) Findings included: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings, and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. 21.148 Standards of nursing conduct (a) A licensed practical nurse shall: (5) Document and maintain accurate records. According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review clinical records and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, as evidenced by experiences reported by six residents out of 15 interviewed (Residents 2, 40, 54, 69, 89, and 92). Findings include: A review of resident clinical records, and a facility provided BIMS (brief interview mental status - to assess cognitive status) report, and random interviews conducted on April 24, 2024, with 15 alert and oriented residents, to include six residents residing on nursing station 1, and nine residents residing on the nursing station 2, revealed that 6 residents' interviewed expressed complaints regarding staff's failure to respond to their requests for assistance and provide requested and needed care and services in a timely manner. During the random interviews, the residents stated that they feel the facility is not adequately staffed because they wait extended periods of time for staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and select grievances/complaints lodged with the facility, resident, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently administer oxygen as ordered and maintain sanitary oxygen delivery systems for two out of five sampled residents (Residents 59, and 72). Findings included: According to the American Thoracic Society, oxygen is a medication that requires a prescription from a healthcare provider. The provider will prescribe your oxygen at a specific flow rate and a specific number of hours per day. It is very important that oxygen is used as prescribed. Using too little oxygen may put a strain on the heart and brain, causing heart failure, fatigue, or memory loss. Using too much oxygen can also be a problem. For some patients, using too much oxygen can cause them to slow their breathing to dangerously low levels. It is important to wear oxygen as your provider ordered it. If the patient starts to experience headaches, confusion, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of the the minutes from Residents' Council meetings and grievances lodged with the facility, resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident preferences for 26 residents of 26 resident meal trays observed and as reported by nine residents out of 15 interviewed (Residents 1, 72, 73, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, and 94). Findings include: A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meeting dated March 4, 2024, revealed that Resident 93 voiced concern that there has not been a good variety of food being offered at meals. A review of the minutes from the Resident Council meeting dated April 1, 2024, revealed that Resident 27 complained that the rice is always hard. Resident 93 voiced concern that the meat served during the St. Patrick's Day meal was tough and food is often hard or under cooked. A review of facility grievance dated February 23, 2024, indicated that Resident 44 complained that the scrambled eggs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in two of two resident pantries. (Station 1 and Station 2) Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation of Station 2 resident pantry refrigerator on January 18, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to demonstrate that licensed nurses evaluated and recorded the provision of necessary nursing care for a change in condition for one resident out of six sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings included: According to the Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing Subsection 21.11 (a) The register nurse assesses human responses and plans, implements and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible. In carrying out this responsibility, the nurse performs all of following functions: (4) Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals (6)(b) The registered nurse is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-08-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post nurse staffing information. Findings include: During an observation on August 11, 2024, at approximately 8:15 AM the facility's current posted nursing hours were not observed. Interview with Employee 1, a registered nurse supervisor, on August 11, 2024, at 8:46 AM, indicated she did not know what posted nursing time was. Interview with the facility's Assistant Director of Nursing on August 11, 2024, at approximately 9:45 AM confirmed the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data as required 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3) Management
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-10-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSCNHHC LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| SAR FT 2021 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| EICHHORN, HOLLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| MANDEL, AVITAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $626K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395691. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.