No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rose View Rehab And Care Center

1201 Rural Avenue, Williamsport, PA 17701 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (570) 323-4340 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 323-4340 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Jan 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Jan 2023
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
829 High St · (570) 220-4918 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
740 High St Ste 1001 · (570) 321-2818 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.8 mi
 
Park
1500 W 3rd St · (570) 326-2500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1103 Park Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.1%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.8%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.4%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.3%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.7%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.9%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.591.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.701.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 36.3–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 10.1–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.2–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
57.3%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 119.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure influenza immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 127) and failed to ensure pneumococcal immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 108).Findings include: Review of the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2025-26 Influenza Season, revealed that vaccination should ideally be offered during September or October. However, vaccination should continue after October and throughout the influenza season as long as influenza viruses are circulating and unexpired vaccine is available. Clinical record review for Resident 127 revealed that the facility admitted her on [DATE]. An Influenza Vaccination Informed Consent form (document the facility utilizes to obtain informed consent for vaccination)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 102 and 108). Findings include: Review of Resident 102's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted her with a diagnosis of pneumonia (an infection in the air sacs in one or both lungs) on September 6, 2024. Review of Resident 102's resolved diagnosis list indicated that her pneumonia infection was resolved on October 10, 2024. A Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated November 15, 2024, indicated the facility assessed her as still having pneumonia. There was no documented evidence in Resident 102's clinical record to indicate that she had a pneumonia infection. Interview with the Administrator on December 19, 2024, at 9:11 AM confirmed that Resident 102's November 15, 2024, MDS was coded in error regarding having pneumonia. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding bowel protocol medication administration for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 48 revealed a medical provider progress note dated November 4, 2024, at 2:17 PM that indicated she was having difficulty passing stool. Review of Resident 48's bowel elimination records revealed that staff documented no bowel movements for November 27, 28, 29, and 30, 2024, and December 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11, 2024. Clinical record review for Resident 48 revealed the following physician orders to promote bowel movements: Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400 MG (milligrams) per 5 ML (milliliters) (MOM, laxative that pulls water into bowel to soften bowel contents) Give 30 ml by mouth as needed (PRN) for constipation if no BM (bowel movement) on day four give with the 7-3 shift morning medication pass. Bisacodyl Suppository 10 MG (Dulcolax, stimulant laxative medication administered via suppository form into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain proper treatment to maintain vision for one of one resident reviewed for vision concerns (Resident 41). Findings include: An interview with Resident 41 on December 17, 2024, at 11:06 AM revealed that she saw the eye doctor a long time ago, and Resident 41stated that she never received her new glasses. Observation of Resident 41's overbed table at this time revealed there was a pair of broken eyeglasses with one of the lenses missing. Review of Resident 41's clinical record revealed see saw Health drive eye care group on June 7, 2024. Health drive recommended new glasses for Resident 41 and to deliver them upon arrival. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 20, 2024, at 10:52 AM confirmed Resident 41 never received the new glasses ordered on June 7, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to identify triggers related to a resident's diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder to provide culturally, competent, trauma-informed care and eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for one of two residents reviewed for PTSD (Resident 57). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 57 revealed that the facility admitted him on March 1, 2023. Clinical record review for Resident 57 revealed that he had a current diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health disorder that is caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event). Review of Resident 57's current care plan revealed a care plan problem entitled, has a mood problem related to PTSD and Adjustment disorder and may display moods of being withdrawn from people. Some triggers include not able to go home independently or to be at home with family. The goal and interventions were noted as follows: Resident 57 will have improved mood state through the review date Administer medications as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the food preparation and dishwashing area in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen with Employee 1, dietary manager, on December 17, 2024, at 8:25 AM revealed the following: Flooring tiles surrounding the dish machine area were absent of grout with observed liquid and food debris buildup in between the tiles. Multiple vinyl tiles in the kitchen entrance area outside the dish room, surrounding the ice machine and production area inside the entrance area were broken and cracked with dirt and debris buildup. The broken and cracked tiles are susceptible to harboring food/dirt debris presenting sanitation concerns in a food preparation area. The flooring where the tile meets the wall and transition strip from the kitchen to the dish machine room was observed with significant black buildup. The above information was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on December 19, 2024, at 2:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received the pneumococcal immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 5). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that the facility admitted Resident 5 on December 3, 2018. Review of Resident 5's immunization history revealed no evidence of a recommended pneumococcal vaccine. Review of a Pneumococcal Immunization Informed Consent dated November 18, 2024, revealed Resident 5's responsible party gave the facility permission to administer the pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 20, 2024, at 11:53 AM it was confirmed that there was no documented evidence that Resident 5 was offered the pneumococcal immunization after the facility received the November 18, 2024 consent. 483.80(d)(1)(2) Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations Previously cited deficiency 12/1/23 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed nursing documentation dated October 26, 2024, at 1:38 PM, noting Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse) went into the resident room to administer medications to Resident 3 in bed A. Documentation revealed Resident 3 was being assisted to the bathroom by staff. Documentation further noted Employee 1 put Resident 3's medications on her bedside table when Resident 4 (resident in bed B) requested a pain pill, and she left the room to obtain the pain medication from the medication cart. When Employee 1 returned with the pain medication, Resident 4 had ingested the medications she put on Resident 3's bedside dresser. The registered nurse notified the on call provider and received a new order to check vital signs every shift for 24 hours. Nursing documentation dated October 26, 2024, at 3:52 PM noted the registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 102). Findings include: The policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use, last reviewed January 18, 2023, indicates that residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Non-pharmacological approaches are used to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. The policy does not include measures the facility will implement to monitor the target behaviors for the as needed use of a psychotropic medication. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated October 27, 2023, that indicated nursing staff were to monitor Resident 3's behaviors and make a progress note regarding her behaviors and interventions every shift. The order did not specify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness in the main kitchen. Findings include: A tour of the facility's main kitchen on November 28, 2023, at 8:25 AM revealed the following: Two three-tiered red plastic carts in the dish room had a build-up of a black removable substance on the storage surface. The attached trash receptacles had a build-up of splatter on the inside and outside surfaces. Concurrent interview with Employee 1, dietary manager, revealed these carts were power washed on a regular basis and the carts are used to pick up dirty dishes on the units after meals. The perimeter of the floor edges in the main kitchen had a build-up of debris. A metal dish caddy was uncovered, exposing the upright stored dishes to contaminants. There were crumbs and debris on the dish surfaces. The drain in front of the ice machine had a rusty build-up and had water pooling around the drain. In the standup refrigerator near the ice machine was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical documentation for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 40, and 83). Findings include: Clinical documentation review for Resident 40 revealed a Fall Risk Evaluation dated November 27, 2023, at 2:52 AM that indicated the resident was documented as having one to two falls in the past three months under the history of falls section. A review of clinical documentation for Resident 40 revealed no evidence of any falls within the past three months as the above Fall Risk Evaluation noted. A request by the surveyor for any fall investigations for Resident 40 during a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 29, 2023, at 2:30 PM revealed no evidence of any falls as indicated. An interview with the Director of Nursing on December 1, 2023, at 9:51 AM confirmed the resident did not have any falls as the Fall Risk Evaluation had indicated. The Director of Nursing further believed the documentation was an error in staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of assessments for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 30, and 66). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 4 revealed a Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screen and Resident Review, assessment used to identify evidence of serious mental illness and/or intellectual or developmental disabilities in all individuals seeking admission to Medicaid- or Medicare-certified nursing facilities) dated November 16, 2018, that indicated Resident 4 had a positive screen for serious mental illness in Section II-D and Section VII indicated that Resident 4 was in a Target Group requiring approval from the Program Office prior to admission. A letter from Office of Mental Health Department of Human Services program offices dated November 20, 2018, determined that Resident 4 had evidence of a mental health condition that met the criteria for a Program Office review and the resident may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to promote acceptable parameters of nutrition for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 30). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 30 on July 21, 2021. Further review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed the following weight assessments: July 18, 2023, 137 pounds August 14, 2023, 127.4 pounds (a 9.6 pound, a 7.1 percent significant weight loss) A nutrition progress note dated August 15, 2023, recommended staff monitor Resident 30's weights weekly, and administer Ensure Clear (a nutrition drink that contains high-quality protein and essential nutrients) three times a day with her meals. Further review of Resident 30's weight assessments revealed staff did not complete weekly weights as recommended by the registered dietician. A review of Resident 30's MAR (Medication Administration Record, a form utilized by the facility to document the administration of medications) dated August 2023, revealed no evidence the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 56). Findings include: Review of a physician's order for Resident 56 dated August 21, 2023, indicated staff to administer oxygen 2 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (flexible plastic tubing with small prongs inserted into the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen) continuously. Review of a nursing progress note for Resident 56 dated November 5, 2023, at 6:13 AM revealed the resident had an oxygen saturation (percentage of oxygen in the blood, normal usually is 95-100 percent) of 64 percent. Resident 56's oxygen was bumped up to 4 lpm and his oxygen saturation came up to 90 percent. Review of the treatment administration records for Resident 56 dated November 2023, revealed that the oxygen was administered continuously at 2 lpm. Observation of Resident 56 on November 28, 2023, at 1:45 PM revealed that the resident's oxygen was set at 3.5 lpm. Concurrent interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of active nurse aides and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance evaluation of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for two of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 5 and 6). Findings Include: Review of the facility's list of nurse aide staff revealed Employee 5 with a hire date of June 1, 2007, and Employee 6 with a hire date of July 7, 2015. A request to review the annual performance evaluations for Employees 5 and 6 revealed no documented evidence that the facility is completing the evaluations at least once every 12 months. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 1, 2023, at 10:24 AM confirmed that performance evaluations were not completed. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store resident medications on one of two nursing units reviewed (Second Floor Nursing Unit). Findings include: Observation of the Second Floor Nursing Unit medication cart with Employee 7 (licensed practical nurse) on November 30, 2023, at 8:40 AM revealed an accumulation of debris and dirt in the bottoms of the drawers on the cart. There were multiple unsecured and unidentified medication tablets on the bottom of several of the drawers that included: a small blue oblong pill, a large white capsule, two round white pills, an oblong white pill, half of a white tablet, two oblong pills, and two beige round pills. The above findings were discussed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 30, 2023, at 2:30 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the administration of a pneumococcal vaccine for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 6). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed that the facility admitted him on December 3, 2018. Review of Resident 6's immunization history revealed no evidence of a recommended pneumococcal vaccine. Review of a Pneumococcal Immunization Informed Consent dated November 6, 2023, revealed Resident 6's responsible party gave the facility permission to administer the pneumococcal vaccination. During an interview with Employee 4 (infection preventionalist) on December 1, 2023, at 1:57 PM it was confirmed that there was no documented evidence that Resident 6 was offered the pneumococcal immunization. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to store food and maintain the equipment in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on January 7, 2023, at 8:30 AM, revealed the following: A metal sink located in the coffee station area was covered in brown stains. A garbage can located under the sink had dried brown spills covering the lid. The garbage cans have a foot pedal mechanism for opening that was non-functional. Two light green colored wash racks were observed sitting on a shelf below the coffee station. The racks contained debris, dried brown spills, and a buildup of a white flaky substance on several areas of the racks. The racks contained several empty clear pitchers and lids that contained significant brown staining. Dried brown splatter was observed on the wall behind the shelf. The lower shelf of a metal stand with wheels located by the condiment/silverware station, holding metal beverage carafes on the lower shelf was observed dirty with dust and debris and sticky…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-10 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure documentation of what the resident and/or their responsible party received pertaining to the written notice of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer for five of six residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Residents 6, 38, 169, 105, and 116). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed nursing documentation dated October 27, 2022, at 1:47 AM noting the facility received a call from the lab indicating Resident 6 had a critical result of her potassium levels. Nursing staff obtained her vitals and notified the nurse practitioner and received an order to send Resident 6 to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Nursing documentation revealed that Resident 6 left the facility via an ambulance at 2:15 AM. Social service documentation dated October 28, 2022, at 6:58 AM revealed notified HCR (health care representative) that a copy of the facility's bed hold policy and resident's transfer notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reconciliation of medications upon discharge for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 15 and 116). Findings include: The policy entitled Transfer or Discharge Documentation, last reviewed on [DATE], indicates that when a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, the disposition of the medications will be documented in the medical record. Review of Resident 15's closed clinical record revealed that she was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Resident 15 had current physician orders for Morphine (a narcotic used to treat pain) 5 mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for pain and Haldol (medication used to treat mental or mood disorders) 2 mg every four hours for agitation or restlessness. Review of Resident 15's controlled substance log for Morphine indicated that there was 12 milliliters of medication left when Resident 15 was discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate and timely physician response to consultant pharmacist recommendations for four of five residents reviewed (Residents 38, 80, 104, and 105). Findings include: The policy entitled Consultant Pharmacist Monthly Reports, last reviewed without changes on January 22, 2022, revealed the consultant pharmacist provides administration a monthly report reviewing the facility's use of medication. Reports are acted upon by nursing and medical staff. After the reports are acted upon, administration reviews and reports to verify that sufficient action has been taken on the reports. Clinical record review for Resident 38 revealed a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review dated February 17, 2022, that requested Resident 38's physician consider gradual dose reductions of Resident 38's Zyprexa (anti-psychotic) and Omeprazole (used to treat certain stomach and esophagus problems). Resident 38's physician responded on March 1, 2022, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, employee personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its established abuse prohibition policy regarding nurse aide registry verification for one of three newly hired licensed/certified employees reviewed (Employee 1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Background Screening Investigations, last reviewed without changes on January 22, 2022, revealed that for any individual applying for a position as a certified nursing assistant, the facility ensures the state nurse aide registry is contacted to determine if any findings of abuse, neglect, mistreatment of individuals, and/or theft of property have been entered into the applicant's file. Should the background investigation disclose any misrepresentation on the application form or information indicating that the individual has been convicted of abuse, neglect, mistreatment of individuals, and/or misappropriation of property, the applicant is not employed or contracted. Review of the list provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing per resident preference for one of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident 112). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 112 on January 8, 2023, at 8:47 AM the resident asked the surveyor, Is there anything you can do about getting showers, I am supposed to get them twice a week. I have to wash up at the sink. I ask them, (staff), if I could get a shower and they just say it isn't your day, and I tell them I didn't get one on my day. Resident 112 could not recall the last time she had a shower, and stated she even washed her hair in the bathroom sink. Resident 112 continued to elaborate as she sat in her wheelchair, pointing to a large plastic bin sitting on top of her tall dresser that was full of toiletries, stating, I can only carry one or two bottles with me as I wheel myself into the bathroom, so that is what I use. Clinical record review for Resident 112 revealed a five-day MDS (minimum data set, an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered treatment for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 83). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 83 revealed a physician progress note dated January 6, 2023, at 1:54 PM that Resident 83 had increased foot edema. Resident 83 reported that his feet felt slightly uncomfortable. The documentation indicated that Resident 83 spent most of his time in a wheelchair and did not elevate his lower extremities. The prescriber indicated a plan to obtain laboratory testing, give additional diuretic medication (medication used to stimulate the body to increase urination to decrease excessive fluid retention), and use tubigrips (tubular fabric used to provide compression) to Resident 83's legs. Nursing documentation dated January 6, 2023, at 4:00 PM confirmed the receipt of a physician's order to ensure that Resident 83 had tubigrips on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and responsible party and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding pressure ulcer assessment and treatment for one of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/skin alterations (Resident 7). Findings include: In a telephone interview with Resident 7's responsible party (RP) on January 7, 2023, at 1:46 PM, the RP indicated she got a call on New Year's Day (Sunday, January 1, 2023) from facility staff that indicated her mother's sock was fused to her foot, and a day ago (January 6, 2023) she got a call that an area on the foot was now opened. An observation of Resident 7 on January 8, 2023, at 8:46 AM revealed the resident was lying in bed sleeping. A cushion was observed towards the bottom of the resident's bed pushed off to the side of the bed and the resident's legs and heels were resting on the bed. The resident was not wearing socks or shoes. A large tan colored bandage was observed on the resident's left heel. Electronic clinical record review did not reveal any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions for a noted decline in range of motion for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 88). Findings include: Review of Resident 88's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated May 13, 2022, and again on November 8, 2022, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 88 as having range of motion limitations to both her lower extremities. Resident 88 was previously assessed by the facility as having no limitations to her lower extremities. The facility did not assess her range of motion for the August 8, 2022, MDS assessment. There was no documented evidence in Resident 88's clinical record to indicate that the facility implemented interventions, such as therapy referrals or restorative programs to address her decline in range of motion to her lower extremities. Interview with Employee 9, physical therapist, on January 10, 2023, at 9:25 AM confirmed the above findings for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate application of supplemental oxygen for two of three residents reviewed for oxygen concerns (Residents 83 and 40). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Oxygen Administration, last reviewed without changes on January 22, 2022, revealed that staff review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Steps in the procedure include to adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is administered. Check the tank to be sure it is in good working order. Observe the resident upon setup and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is tolerated. After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, information recorded in the resident's medical record should include the date and time the procedure was performed, the name and title of the individual who performed the procedure, the rate of oxygen flow, and the signature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of one resident reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed the facility added a dementia diagnosis on April 7, 2022. Review of a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated November 6, 2022, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 6 as having the diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. Review of Resident 6's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the resident's dementia and cognitive loss. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 10, 2023, at 9:55 AM confirmed the above findings for Resident 6. 28 Pa Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 211.11(d) Resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 72 and 105). Findings include: The policy entitled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last reviewed on January 22, 2022, indicates that the need to continue PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. The policy provided by the facility does not specify that staff will document targeted behaviors prior to the administration of PRN psychotropics, nor does it indicate that nursing staff will attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic. Review of Resident 72's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated November 30, 2022, for nursing staff to administer Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Residents 100, 6, and 65). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 9.68 percent based on 31 medication opportunities with three medication errors. Review of the current manufacturer's guidelines for Flonase (a nasal spray to treat allergies) nasal spray indicates that patients should blow their nose gently to clear nostrils then close one nostril and spray nozzle into the opposite nostril. Observation of a medication administration on January 7, 2023, at 8:24 AM revealed Employee 8, licensed practical nurse, administered Flonase to Resident 100. Employee 8 administered two sprays of the Flonase to both sides of Resident 100's nose. Employee 8 did not close one nostril while administering the Flonase into the other nostril nor provide instructions to Resident 100 to do so. Interview with Employee 8, on January 7, at 10:29 AM confirmed the above findings for Resident 100 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to coordinate and provide dental services to meet the needs for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 40). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 40 on January 7, 2023, at 11:29 AM the resident was observed to have many missing teeth. Resident 40 stated her mouth is very painful and she has many teeth that have broken off at the gums, and she stated, not only does it look awful, but it also makes her talk funny. Clinical record review for Resident 40 revealed the resident received dental services on June 24, 2021, at which time the dentist noted, Patient requests remaining teeth be extracted to alleviate discomfort they cause her and so she can have dentures constructed to help her eat and speak better. Referred below to oral surgeon for extractions of remaining dentition. The next evidence of dental services for Resident 40 revealed a dental report dated September 28, 2022, (greater than 15 months since the June 2021 visit), which noted,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer, or provide education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects with the COVID-19 vaccine for three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 19, 46, and 87). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 19 on October 13, 2022. Further review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed no documentation that Resident 19 was offered or received the COVID-19 vaccine, or that the facility provided the resident or resident's responsible party education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the vaccine. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 46 on June 26, 2022. Further review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed no documentation that Resident 46 was offered or received both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, or that the facility provided the resident or resident's responsible party education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the vaccine. Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-10 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have evidence of the written notice of transfer provided to the resident, the resident's responsible party, and the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, for five of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 6, 38, 169, 105, and 116). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, last reviewed without changes on [DATE], revealed that when a resident is transferred or discharged , details of the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record. The policy did not include the requirement that the facility provide the resident, the resident's responsible party, and the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, a notice in writing that included the reasons for, the effective date of, and the location the resident was transferred or discharged .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 7%Other / private 14%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,563per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395767. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next