No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Williamsport Home, The

1900 Ravine Road, Williamsport, PA 17701 · Non profit - Other · 129 certified beds · (570) 323-8781 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 323-8781 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
904 Campbell St · (570) 323-5352 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
740 High St Ste 1001 · (570) 321-2818 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1916 Lycoming Creek Rd · (570) 326-5802 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2012 Green Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.9%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.701.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.701.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 347 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.3%CMS range 47.3–56.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.9–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.0%CMS range 3.1–8.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
43.0%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 118.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-28)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist residents with hearing aid devices for three of three residents reviewed for hearing concerns (Residents 29, 65, and 119).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 65 revealed an active physician order dated December 31, 2025, for staff to place hearing aids in Resident 65's bilateral ears in the morning and take them out in the evening. Review of an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated January 6, 2026, revealed that staff assessed Resident 65 with adequate hearing with a hearing aid. The MDS CAA (Care Assessment Area) for communication triggered for staff to develop a plan of care to address Resident 65's potential communication deficits. Review of a plan of care initiated by the facility on January 9, 2026, to address Resident 65's risk for impaired communication revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents with wound treatments and foley catheters, for four of four employees reviewed for competencies (Employees 2, 3, 4, and 5).Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 17 residents with indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine) and 28 residents with dressing changes (treatment to and changes in the covering of wounds). A request for nursing staff competencies for dressing changes and catheter care revealed the facility was unable to provide competencies for these for Employees 2 and 3 (licensed practical nurses), and Employees 4 and 5 (registered nurses). The findings were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator and Employee 1 (registered nurse/staff development) on January 29, 2026, at 10:05 AM. They confirmed the facility could provide no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for one of five residents reviewed for medication review (Resident 9).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed her medication regime included the use of Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication, a drug that mainly treat psychosis-related conditions and symptoms) 12.5 milligrams in the morning and 25 milligrams at bedtime since April 10, 2025, for expressions or indication of distress related to dementia. Review of behavior monitoring recorded on Resident 9's documentation records for the months of April, May, June, and July 2025, revealed no behaviors documented for the resident. There was no evidence of any further information to indicate the resident was in any emotional distress or having any behavioral concerns in the resident's clinical record. Clinical record review of a pharmacist consultation report for Resident 9 dated July 22, 2025, revealed a recommendation of a GDR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident's injury of unknown origin for two of six sampled residents (Residents 24 and 33). Findings include The facility policy entitled Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed without changes on December 30, 2025, revealed bruises or injuries of unknown origin found on a resident by staff, or reported by the residents themselves will be investigated promptly in an effort to determine how the bruise or injury occurred and rule out potential abuse. Direction of the investigation into bruises or injuries of unknown origin will be determined by the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator after review and discussion of information presented. All investigative efforts will be documented providing chronology of the investigation, and a list of people working who could reasonably have knowledge of the incident. All statements of direct witnesses, the accused, and if able the resident should be legibly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care for implanted cardiac pacemakers for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 115 and 7). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 115 revealed an active physician order dated January 15, 2026, that the resident had quarterly appointments to check her cardiac device (pacemaker, surgically inserted medical device with wires attached to the heart for the purpose of administering electrical impulses to regulate the heart rate). The appointment scheduled for February 13, 2026, at 9:00 AM was for a, remote interrogation (remote interrogation refers to the process of wirelessly collecting data from an implanted pacemaker and transmitting it to healthcare providers. This technology enables continuous monitoring of the device's performance and the patient's heart rhythm without requiring the patient to visit the clinic physically. Pacemakers equipped with remote…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff and resident interview it is determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services to prevent a pressure ulcer for one of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer concerns (Resident 3).Findings include: Observation of Resident 3 in her room on January 26, 2026, at 1:06 PM revealed that she had a left elbow protector on. Concurrent interview of Resident 3 revealed that she has a sore on her arm. She indicated that she has been dealing with if for a long time although it was healed once but opened up again. She indicated the sore was on her elbow and that she was unsure how it happened. Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed a progress note dated May 31, 2025, at 12:02 PM that indicated Resident 3 was noted to have a skin tear to her left elbow that measured 1.0-centimeter (cm) x 1.0 cm. The area was cleansed and Opti Foam (a foam dressing with a silicone face and border) was applied. Further clinical record review revealed a physician's order dated May 31, 2025, at 11:46 AM for Resident 3's left elbow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain a resident's range of motion (ROM) for one of three residents reviewed for ROM concerns (Resident 3). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 3 on March 11, 2025. Resident 3's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 17, 2025, revealed that the resident had no impairments of her upper extremities. Review of her MDS for the dates of May 8, 2025, August 5, 2025, and September 26, 2025, revealed that Resident 3 had no impairment of her upper extremities. Review of her annual MDS dated [DATE], noted staff assessed Resident 3 as having impairment to ROM of one side of her upper extremities. Further clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed that a passive range of motion program (PROM, movement of a body part by another to maintain a resident's ability) was initiated to her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate physician response to a pharmacy recommendation for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 19 revealed a consulting pharmacist report dated June 28, 2025, requesting a gradual dose reduction or a documented rationale for declining for Resident 19's Escitalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 5 mg daily. Resident 19's physician declined the recommendation on July 3, 2025, indicating that the resident's targeted symptoms returned or worsened after the most recent gradual dose reduction and that the continued use is in accordance with the current standard of practice and a gradual dose reduction attempt at this time would likely impair Resident 19's function or cause instability. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 29, 2026, at 12:42 PM revealed that the facility was unable to provide documentation that a previous dose reduction was attempted and unsuccessful. The facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the administration of pneumococcal immunizations for two of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 87 and 119).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Vaccination of Residents, last reviewed December 30, 2025, revealed that all residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. All new residents shall be assessed for current vaccination status upon admission. The facility policy entitled, Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy, last reviewed December 30, 2025, revealed that all residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines to aid in preventing infections and pneumonia. Pneumococcal vaccines include Pneumococcal Polysaccharide (Pneumovax 23, PPSV23),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination that included at a minimum that staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine, that staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine, or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine, for one of one employee reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination (Employee 8).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, COVID-19-Covid Plan, last reviewed without changes on December 30, 2025, revealed that the facility would vaccinate residents and health care professionals (HCP) against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) as part of their plan's core principles. The facility would encourage everyone to remain up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses. HCP should be offered resources and be counseled about the importance of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview with Employee 8 (environmental services director) on January 29, 2026, at 10:50 AM revealed that she believed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and orderly environment on 3 of six nursing units (300 400, and 500 Nursing Units, Residents 14, 3, 81, and 84) and at the facility's main entrance. Findings include: Observation of the 300 Hall Nursing Unit on the following dates and times revealed the following: On February 25, 2025, at 1:31 PM there was a strong odor of urine in Resident 14's room. On February 26, 2025, at 11:27 AM and February 27, 2025, at 1:00 PM and there was an odor of urine in Resident 14's room. Observation of the main entrance to the facility on February 25, 2025, at 1:02 PM and February 27, 2025, at 8:33 AM and 12:48 PM, revealed the following: One medical face mask was discarded on the ground and two others discarded in the landscape adjacent to the main entrance of the facility. A used tissue discarded in the planter next to the main entrance. An overflowing garbage can. Multiple cigarette butts discarded on the ground and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided that was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: Interview with Resident 84 on February 26, 2025, at 11:24 AM she indicated that she has pain and that it is not controlled with the medication that they give her. She said her pain is in her legs and that it is worse when they move her. She indicated that she usually would ask staff for her pain medication and if it is time they will give it to her. A physician's progress note dated December 17, 2024, at 6:08 PM revealed that Resident 84 was seen by orthopedics related to her left leg contracture and they reported that her extremity is bone on bone and that she is not a surgical candidate. They recommended palliative care and pain management. The physician discontinued her Tramadol (a medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) and increased her dose of Oxycodone (a medication used to treat moderate to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for the risk of side rail entrapment for 6 of 11 residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 3, 9, 12, 38, 71, and 262), and review the risk and benefits of side rail utilization with the resident or resident representative, and receive consent for the use of side rails for 5 of 11 residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 3, 9, 12, 59, 71). Findings include: Observation of Resident 12's room on February 26, 2025, at 11:23 AM revealed that there were bilateral grab bars observed on the bed. Clinical record review for Resident 12 revealed that the facility completed an enabler bar assessment, review of potential risks, and consent on November 29, 2023. The facility completed an enabler bar entrapment evaluation on December 27, 2023, which indicated that they passed for potential entrapment for zones one (within the rail), two (between the bottom of the rail and top of compressed mattress), three (between the edge of the mattress and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a timely physician response to consultant pharmacist recommendations for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 21, 57, and 64). Findings include: The facility policy Monthly Medication Regimen Review, last reviewed on February 11, 2025, revealed that if an identified irregularity requires urgent action, the pharmacist will immediately report the irregularity to the Director of Nursing or designee and the attending physician by phone. Review of a medication regimen review for Resident 57 dated September 26, 2024, revealed a Consultation Report, which noted the pharmacist made a recommendation of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for the resident's Duloxetine (a medication used to treat depression, anxiety, and sometimes pain). Further review of this documentation for Resident 57 revealed that the physician had responded to the recommendation by declining it, signing, and dating the document on November 15, 2024. The documentation was also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to maintain a resident's continence status for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) Resident Assessment Indicators (RAI) 3.0 Manual, Section H indicated that each resident who is incontinent or at risk of developing incontinence should be identified, assessed, and provided with individualized treatment (medications, non-medicinal treatments and/or devices) and services to achieve or maintain as normal elimination function as possible. Clinical record review for Resident 9 revealed that since July 3, 2024, Resident 1 had a physician's order to transfer and ambulate with use of a gait belt, a rolling walker, and one staff assistance. The facility completed an annual MDS assessment on January 24, 2025. The facility identified that Resident 9 was moderately impaired, with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store oxygen and respiratory care equipment consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 28 and 74). Findings include: Observation of Resident 28 on February 25, 2025, at 2:43 PM revealed a nebulizer machine (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) sitting on the resident's stand beside her bed. A mouthpiece connected to the tubing coming from the machine was observed hanging down in front of the stand uncovered. Resident 28 indicated they received nebulizer treatments two or three times a day. An observation of Resident 28 on February 26, 2025, at 9:25 AM revealed the nebulizer machine again sitting on the resident's stand beside her bed with the mouthpiece hanging down in front of the stand uncovered. Clinical record review for Resident 28 revealed the resident was ordered Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution (a liquid) to inhale by mouth using a nebulizer every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication to a resident based on professional standards of practice resulting in the potential for a significant medication error for one of 5 residents reviewed for administration of medications (Resident 262). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 262 on February 25, 2025, at 2:03 PM the resident indicated there was a mix up with her medications Zofran (a medication used to treat nausea and vomiting) and Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety) from when she was at the facility the first time, and she should not have had them the second time. Clinical record review for Resident 262 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and sent to the hospital after a change in condition on January 26, 2025. A progress note for Resident 262 dated January 27, 2025, at 12:39 PM noted facility staff met with a family member of the resident who was in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication security for one of six nursing units (300 Hall Nursing Unit). Findings include: Observation of the 300 Hall Nursing Unit on February 25, 2025, revealed the following: At 8:48 AM, upon arrival to the 300 Hall Nursing Unit, the surveyor observed the unit's medication cart unlocked while it was near the soiled utility room. No licensed staff were observed in the vicinity. There were several unlicensed staff pushing residents in wheelchairs past the medication cart while it was unlocked. At 8:49 AM, Employee 1, licensed practical nurse, returned to the medication cart from down the hallway and out of view of the medication cart. Employee 1 left the 300 Hall Nursing Unit's medication cart while they were away from the medication cart and did not have direct visualization of the medication cart. Interview on February 25, 2025, at 9:18 AM with Employee 1 acknowledged that their medication cart was left unsecure while they were away from it. The findings were reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident to obtain routine dental care for one of two residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 84). Findings include: Interview and observation of Resident 84 on February 26, 2025, at 11:06 AM while she was in bed revealed that she had her own teeth. Resident 84 indicated that she had not seen a dentist since she had been in the facility. Clinical record review for Resident 84 revealed that her current payment source was the state Medicaid benefit. Further clinical record review for Resident 84 revealed no evidence of her receiving dental services over the past 12 months. Interview of the Director of Nursing on February 28, 2025, at 8:00 AM revealed that there was no evidence that Resident 84 received dental care or that she was offered dental care and refused treatment. The facility failed to provide Resident 84 with routine prophylactic dental cleanings as covered under the State plan. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical documentation for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 100). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's list of active diagnosis revealed Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) added on January 22, 2025. Review of an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment completed at periodic intervals of time to assess resident care needs) dated January 28, 2025, for Resident 100 revealed the resident was listed as having a diagnosis of PTSD. Interview with Resident 100 on February 25, 2025, at 12:02 PM revealed the resident indicated hearing sirens specifically were traumatizing to him due to his history, but stated he did not have an official diagnosis of PTSD from a psychologist or medical professional. In an interview with Employee 2, social services, on February 27, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding pressure injury risk for one of four residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings Include: Review of Resident CR1's closed clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment done at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 7, 2024, revealed that the facility assessed Resident CR1 as being at risk of developing pressure ulcers and/or injury and indicated that a care plan regarding this risk would be developed. Review of Resident CR1's plan of care revealed that the facility did not develop a plan of care to address his risk of pressure ulcer and/or injury until April 3, 2024, two days after his discharge from the facility. The above findings were reviewed and acknowledged during a phone interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on May 8, 2024, at 1:30 PM. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding surgical incision assessments and treatments for one of 4 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). Findings include: The policy entitled Wound Treatment Guidelines, provided as the policy in effect for the facility as of March 1, 2024, indicated that the facility will report any changes to the surgeon such as drainage, pain, redness, or warmth. The policy did not indicate how often the facility will assess a surgical incision for signs and symptoms of infection. Review of Resident CR1's closed clinical record revealed that the facility admitted him on March 1. 2024. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident CR1 was admitted with a thoracic (an area on the spine below the neck to below the shoulder blades) incision with 25 staples with black crusted drainage present. A nursing note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of select forms and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective procedure for acquiring and dispensing medications for five of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6). Findings include: Documents provided by the Director of Nursing on March 29, 2024, at 9:30 AM identified the procedure for obtaining medications for new admissions, effective March 18, 2024, indicates that if the facility orders medications by 11:00 AM, the pharmacy will depart at 2:20 PM to deliver Monday through Friday. If orders are completed by 9:00 PM, pharmacy will depart at 12:30 AM to deliver Monday through Friday. The procedure also indicates that there is a 5 Step Order Process in which nursing staff shall determine what time the resident medication is due, then determine when the delivery time would be for the pharmacy. If the delivery time is after the time the dose is due, staff are to determine availability of the medication from their Omnicell (a backup inventory of medications stored on-site…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered vital signs, interventions, and treatments for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 34, 76, and 99). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 34 revealed a current physician's order dated August 23, 2023, for staff to monitor their blood pressure and heart rate at 11:00 AM on Wednesdays and fax results to the physician if the heart rate was greater than 120 beats per minute (bpm) or less than 60 bpm and if the systolic blood pressure (pressure when the heart contracts) was greater than 160 mmHg (millimeters of Mercury) or less than 110 mmHg. Review of Resident 34's clinical documentation revealed that staff completed blood pressures and heart rates on the following dates: August 23, 2023, at 11:00 AM heart rate 56 bpm November 15, 2023, at 11:00 AM blood pressure of 104/72 mmHg Clinical record review for Resident 76…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by four of four residents reviewed (Residents 26, 52, 75, and 79). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 26 revealed the facility admitted her on December 6, 2023, with diagnoses including severe dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) with agitation and dementia with behavioral disturbances. A review of Resident 26's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated December 12, 2023, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 26 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 26's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate response to consultant pharmacist recommendations for three of five residents reviewed for potentially unnecessary medications (Residents 37, 75, and 79). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 37 revealed a consultant pharmacist report dated June 26, 2023, requesting the facility monitor the effectiveness and potential adverse effects of Resident 37's Cymbalta (antidepressant medication) and ensure it was documented in the clinical record regularly. Further review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed no evidence that the facility addressed the June 2023 consultant pharmacist recommendation. Clinical record review for Resident 75 revealed a consultant pharmacist report dated April 30, 2023, that requested a gradual dose reduction of Resident 75's Zoloft. Further review of Resident 75's clinical record revealed Resident 75's physician did not address the April 2023 consultant pharmacist recommendation until July 11, 2023. Clinical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness in the therapy suite and the facility's pantry for six of six nursing units (100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and Ravine Ridge Nursing Units). Findings include: Observation of the 100-nursing unit's pantry on February 1, 2023, at 8:24 AM revealed several items under the sink, including two containers of cleaning wipes, several glass vases, a lap blanket, two one-gallon containers of water, and a basin. Observation of the 200-nursing unit's pantry on February 1, 2023, at 8:30 AM revealed several items under the sink, including several vases, a small trash can, a broken glass, and old Christmas decorations. Observation of the Ravine Ridge nursing unit's pantry on February 1, 2023, at 8:34 AM revealed several items under the sink, including cleaning wipes, two containers of hand soap, a container of dish soap, vases, and a plastic piece for a refrigerator. Observation of the Ravine Ridge nursing unit's satellite kitchen on February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy and procedures, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents could make choices about aspects of their lives that were significant to them, such as smoking, for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 315). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Smoking Policy Skilled Nursing Facility, last reviewed without changes on January 25, 2024, revealed the facility is a smoke free building. The policy of the facility was to ensure that smoking was only permitted in a designated area and was done in a safe manner. New residents will be informed that the facility is smoke free; and they are welcome to reside here but may not smoke. The procedure indicated that the skilled nursing center has a designated smoking area on the porch outside the main lobby for visitors to smoke. Staff are permitted to smoke during break times in areas indicated by signs as a designated smoking area to include the smoke shack off the skilled nursing facility and the designated smoking areas at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 314). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 314 revealed that the facility admitted her on January 25, 2024, with diagnoses of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life), mood disturbance (feelings of distress or sadness), psychotic disturbance (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). Further clinical record review for Resident 314 revealed a behavioral progress noted dated January 28, 2024, at 9:58 AM that indicated the resident was hitting the nurse and nurse aide multiple times during morning care. The note indicated she was very combative and unable to redirect. A social service progress noted dated January 29, 2024, at 10:10 AM revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reconciliation of controlled medications upon discharge for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 111). Findings include: Review of Resident 111's closed clinical record revealed that she expired and was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. Resident 111 had current physician orders for Oxycodone (a narcotic used to treat pain) 5 mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for pain and Ativan (medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 mg two times a day as needed for anxiety. There was no documented evidence in Resident 111's closed clinical record to indicate that the facility accounted for the disposition of her controlled medications upon her discharge. There was no documented evidence to indicate if the controlled medications were destroyed, returned to the pharmacy, or diverted. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 2, 2024, at 8:13 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 78). Findings include: Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated January 8, 2024, that indicated nursing staff assessed Resident 78 as being administered insulin injections. Review of Resident 78's physician orders did not include evidence of insulin medication. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Employee 1 (assistant director of nursing) on February 1, 2024, at 2:38 PM confirmed the MDS was incorrect and Resident 78 did not receive insulin during the lookback period. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SHEEHAN, TAMMYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/28/2022
BOGART, ASHLEYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2020
CONNOLLY, HIENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/23/2019
POTE, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/02/2018
ATHERHOLT, SHARONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/28/2020
BARCLAY, LAURIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/02/2018
CAREY, MAUREENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/28/2020
CONFAIR, BRETTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/24/2020
DEWAR, CANDYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/26/2022
EVANS, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/26/2021
KREMSER, WINONAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2009
LAYCHUR, RENEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/28/2021
PAGANA, KATHLEENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/27/2021
PICCOLO, CATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/02/2018
SHIPMAN, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/02/2018
STUBLER, BETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2009
AFFINITY HEALTH SERVICESOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/02/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 11%Other / private 37%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$473per resident / day
operating cost
$14,368per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$421per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395678. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next