Garden Spring Rehab And Care Center
1113 North Easton Road, Willow Grove, PA 19090 · For profit - Corporation · 173 certified beds · (215) 830-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,753 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-05)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 13.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.6% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.4% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 16.7% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.4% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.51 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.5%CMS range 20.9–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.0–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.5–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 135.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, review of manufacturer's instructions, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement proper infection control procedures regarding the use and disinfection of a multi-use blood glucose meter (BGM) for four of 21 residents that utilized one of two medication carts on the nursing unit. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation due to an increased likelihood of transmitting bloodborne pathogens between residents who required fingerstick blood glucose testing. (Residents 38, 42, 43, 48)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level, last reviewed October 1, 2025, revealed that blood glucose meters intended for reuse were to be cleaned and disinfected between resident uses according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice. Review of manufacturer's instructions for the blood glucose meters used by the facility revealed that staff should clean the product with a commercially available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, family interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate that a resident's discharge from the facility was appropriate and that a discharge plan was implemented prior to the discharge for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Discharge Summary and Plan, last reviewed January 23, 2026, revealed that when the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence, a post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The post-discharge plan will be developed by the interdisciplinary team with the assistance of the resident and their representative(s). The plan will include: where the resident plans to live, arrangements that have been made for aftercare and services, a description of the resident's discharge goals, how the interdisciplinary team will support the resident and their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) or legal representative of all required information, including the date of discharge, the reason for discharge, the location to which the resident was discharged , their appeal rights, and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman's information in writing upon discharge from the facility for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was discharged to the hospital on April 15, 2026, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident and resident's responsible party, or the legal representative were provided information regarding the location to which the resident was discharged , appeal rights, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman information, and agency information pertaining to protection of individuals with a mental disorder, and that the facility provided copies of the written transfer notices to a representative of the Office of the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's responsible party was notified of a change in treatment for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and dementia. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment and was on hospice services. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident experienced behaviors of yelling out at times. On April 8, 2026, a physician changed an order for an anti-anxiety medication (Ativan). The Ativan had been given as needed until April 8, 2026, when the physician ordered for the medication to be administered six times a day for anxiety. There was no documented evidence that the responsible party was notified of the change in the frequency of the medication. In an interview on April 15, 2026, at 9:52 a.m., the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff on two of two nursing units toured. (Section Two, Section Four)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Oxygen Storage Policy, last reviewed on October 10, 2024, revealed that oxygen cylinders must be secured in a cylinder rack or holder to prevent tipping. Observations on July 11, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the top and front of the air conditioning unit was covered in a black substance. Resident 4 was observed standing next to bed A. The fitted sheet had a large brown stain on it and two pillows without case covers on them. Resident 8 was observed in bed B. There was an uncapped 50 milliliter syringe, typically used for flushing feeding tubes, lying on the resident's bed. The resident was observed sleeping in bed and a tube feeding was infusing.In an interview on July 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for two of eight sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 2, 6)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included aphasia, hypertension, and had severe physical limitations. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 2 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, grooming, and bathing. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). On July 11, 2025, at 10:40 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. Her fingernails were long and dirty. There was no documented evidence that staff assisted Resident 2 with trimming and cleaning her nails. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 had diagnoses that included a tracheostomy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of eight sampled residents. (Resident 2)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included a history of stroke, dysphagia, and had a feeding tube. A physician's order dated January 21, 2025, directed staff to flush the feeding tube with 200 milliliters (ml) of water every six hours for a total volume of 800 ml daily. On July 11, 2025, at 10:48 a.m., the water flush bag was observed on the pole and infusing into Resident 2's feeding tube. The flush rate was observed to be 30 ml per hour. In an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse 1 stated that the pump ran for 22 hours per day and confirmed the rate was set for 30 ml per hour. The pump rate as observed infused 660 ml per day, which was 140 ml less than the total flush amount ordered by the resident's physician.In an interview on July 11, 2025, at 3:46 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the pump should have been programmed to deliver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one of eight sampled residents with a history of wounds. (Resident 2)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included aphasia (a communication disorder that creates impaired ability to comprehend or formulate language due to a brain dysfunction), hypertension, and had severe physical limitations. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated June 9, 2025, revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, was immobile, and could not communicate her needs. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had potential for impairment to skin integrity due to deconditioning and staff were to apply cushioned heel boots to bilateral feet when the resident was in bed. Multiple observations on July 11, 2025, between 10:40 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., revealed that Resident 2 was in bed. The heel boots were not in place and her heels were not elevated. In an interview on July 11,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to prevent the spread of infection for one of eight sampled residents. (Resident 5)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed on October 10, 2024, revealed that staff were to wear a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities such as tracheostomy care to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) to residents with indwelling medical devices regardless of their MDRO colonization status. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of respiratory failure requiring a tracheostomy, history of a stroke, and had a feeding tube. Review of the care plan revealed that Resident 5 required Enhanced Barrier Precautions and called for staff to wear gloves and gowns during close contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to verify professional license and complete a criminal background check prior to the start of employment for one of five newly hired employees. (E5) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Background Screening Investigations, dated October 23, 2023, revealed that the facility was to conduct screening for all potential hires. This included license/registration verification and a criminal background check. Employee 5 (E5) had been working in the facility as a Registered Nurse since August 16, 2024, and an inquiry to the state licensure board and a criminal background check were not completed until October 16, 2024. In an interview on October 18, 2024, at 9:45 a.m., the Administrator confirmed there was no documented evidence that the license verification and criminal background check were done prior to start of employment per facility policy. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.19(3) Personnel policies and procedures.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for one of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 65) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 65 had diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure). A physician's order dated February 9, 2022, directed staff to administer a medication (midodrine) three times a day for hypotension. Staff were not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was greater than 120 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Review of Resident 65's medication administration records revealed that staff administered the medication 17 times in September and six times in October 2024, when the resident's SBP was greater than 120 mm Hg. In an interview on October 18, 2024, at 9:39 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the medications were administered outside established parameters for Resident 65. CFR 483.25 Quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions that prevented new or worsened pressure ulcers for three of three sampled residents with skin impairments. (Residents 1, 2, 3) Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention, last reviewed September 2024, revealed that staff were to conduct a skin assessment with the weekly risk assessment. Residents at risk for pressure ulcers were to be repositioned on an individualized schedule. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (PCM), muscle weakness, and hemiplegia to the left side. The resident had a stage four pressure ulcer to the sacrum and a stage three pressure ulcer to the left shoulder. Staff were to turn and reposition the resident every two hours and check the resident for incontinence episodes and soiled bedding every hour. Review of the documentation for August and September 2024, revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included gastroesophageal reflux disease (acid reflux), pain, and neuropathy (nerve damage). Physician's orders dated July 26, 2024, directed staff to administer Acetaminophen (a medication for pain) and gabapentin (a medication for nerve pain) at 6:00 a.m. daily. A physician's order dated July 27, 2024, directed staff to administer omeprazole (a medication to treat acid reflux) at 6:00 a.m. daily. There was no evidence that the medications were offered or administered on August 7, 2024, per the physician's orders. In an interview on August 8, 2024, at 2:07 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no evidence that the medications were administered per the physician's orders. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) on one of five nursing units. (Section 2) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Administering Medications, last reviewed September 2023, revealed that Medications were to be administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders, which included any required timeframe. Medications were to be administered within one hour of their prescribed time. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and multiple sclerosis. A review of physician's orders dated June 29, 2018, June 9, 2021, March 28, 2023, and August 5, 2024, revealed that staff were to administer the following medications at 8:00 a.m. daily: vitamin D3 1000 international units (IU), Zeposia 0.92 milligrams (mg), escitalopram 20 mg, and Bactrim 160 mg. Observation of the medication pass on August 8, 2024, revealed that licensed practical nurse (LPN) 1 did not administer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by providing access to the call bell system for two of six sampled residents. (Residents 4, 5) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated May 16, 2024, the resident could communicate her care needs and was dependent on staff for care. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and that staff was to keep her call bell within reach. Observations on July 12, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. and 12:15 p.m., revealed the resident was in bed and the call bell was wrapped around the armchair, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on left side) and heart failure. According to the MDS assessment, dated April 30, 2024, the resident was alert and was dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safety interventions for falls were in place for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated May 16, 2024, the resident could communicate her care needs and was dependent on staff for care. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and staff was instructed to place the bed in the low position with floor mats on both sides of the bed while the resident was in bed. Observations on July 12, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. and 12:15 p.m., revealed the resident was in bed without the floor mats in place, and the bed was not in a low position. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, prior to moving a resident to another room, for four of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 9, 10, 11, 12) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Room Change/Roommate Assignment, last reviewed Ocotber 30, 2023, revealed that prior to changing a room or roommate assignment residents and their representatives are given advanced written notice of the change. The advance notice would include why the change is being made and documention of the change would be recorded in the resident's medical record. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 had a room change completed on May 24, 2024. There was no documented evidence that Resident 9 and their representative were given notice, including written notice, of the room change. In an interview on June 17, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., Resident 9 stated he did not know why or when he changes rooms, they just moved him. Clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on three of four nursing units. (Units 1, 2, 3) Findings include: On November 13, 2023, at 11:24 a.m., standing water was observed on the floor in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the shower room opposite room [ROOM NUMBER]. In an interview at this time with Housekeeper 1, it was revealed that this had been an ongoing problem for longer than two weeks. On November 15, 2023, at 11:40 a.m., the shower room opposite room [ROOM NUMBER] was cluttered with numerous shower beds and equipment, the toilet seat on the toilet was crooked, protruding into a walking path. There were black spots on the floor and the sink. The sharps container on the wall was filled beyond capacity. Multiple bottles of soap/shampoo were sitting on top of the sharps container and blocking the grab rails of the shower stall sides. There was a rust stain on the shower stall floor. On November 13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for one of 27 sampled residents. (Resident 118) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 118 had diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of both knees and hips, high blood pressure, and stroke. A physician's order dated June 14, 2023, directed staff to apply heel boots (devices to protect the skin of the feet) while in bed. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for skin breakdown. Multiple observations on November 13 through 15, 2023, between 9:46 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., revealed Resident 118 in bed and the heel boots were not applied. In an interview on November 16, 2023, at 9:48 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff did not apply the heel boots as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to increase or prevent a reduction in range of motion for three of 27 sampled residents. (Residents 36, 47, 116) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Restorative Nursing Services, reviewed October 30, 2023, revealed that restorative nursing programs were to be individualized to specific resident needs and the care plan was to be updated or developed to include interventions to support the resident's restorative nursing program. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 36 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia and neuropathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 36 had functional limitation in range of motion to his upper and lower limbs. On November 10, 2023, the occupational therapist recommended a restorative nursing program for passive range of motion to upper and lower limbs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff properly secured smoking materials for one of one sampled resident that smoked (Resident 48) and failed to ensure that safety interventions were in place to prevent accidents for one of 37 sampled residents. (Resident 88) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Smoking Policy, last reviewed October 30, 2023, revealed that facility staff was to keep cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and lighters in a secure place. In an interview conducted on Novemeber 16, 2023, at 9:55 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that staff was to store smoking materials in a locked cart. On November 15, 2023, at 10:36 a.m., an electronic cigarette device was observed in Resident 48's room, not properly secured and accessible to unauthorized residents. In an interview at that time, Resident 48 stated, I keep my electronic cigarette on me. Clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of 27 sampled residents. (Resident 36) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 36 had diagnoses that included PTSD, insomnia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. On October 3, 2023, a psychologist noted that the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD and reported childhood abuse. In an interview on November 13, 2023, at 10:46 a.m., the resident stated he still thinks about his traumatic childhood and it continues to affect him daily. There was no documented assessment or care plan that identified symptoms or triggers related to the PTSD diagnosis and there were no resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. In an interview on November 16, 2023, at 9:48 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications/biologicals were securely stored on one of four nursing units. (Unit 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Storage of Medications, last reviewed October 20, 2023, revealed that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were to be stored in locked compartments and only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. Medication storage rooms were to be locked when not in use and unlocked medications are not to be left unattended. On November 15, 2023, at 11:39 a.m., the medication room on Unit 1 was unlocked and unattended. The refrigerator inside was also unlocked and contained medication including insulin. On November 16, 2023, from 11:45 a.m. through 11:55 a.m., the medication room on Unit 1 was again unlocked. There were two open cardboard boxes containing medications, including ibuprofen, in the room. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Food Storage, dated September 29, 2022, revealed that all food must be labelled with the name of the item and that if opened, the date it was opened and use by date should be on the food item. Observation during the tour of the dietary department on November 29, 2022, at 10:22 a.m., revealed the following: There was an opened bag of beef patties in the freezer with no date on it and two aluminum pans of a food item that the Food Service Director (FSD) identified as churros that were not dated and labelled. In the dry food storage area, numerous items were opened and not labelled with a date, including a bin of a white powdery substance that the FSD identified as sugar. There was a dented can of pineapple tidbits that had leaked onto the floor below the shelves. There were two packages of cheese in the cooler that were not labelled or dated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, observation, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to wash hands during the medication pass in accordance with facility infection control policy on two of four nursing units(Units 2 and 3) and failed to perform infection surveillance in accordance with facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Administering Oral Medication, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that staff was to wash or sanitize hands before and after giving medications to residents. On November 30, 2022, between 9:30 and 10:30 a.m., LPN 1 was observed giving medication to Residents 62 and 105 without washing or sanitizing her hands between residents. At the same time, LPN 2 was observed giving medication to Residents 18, 59, and 107 without washing or sanitizing her hands between residents. Review of the facility policy entitled, Surveillance for Infections, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that the infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on three of four nursing units. (Units 1, 2, 3) Findings include: On November 29, 2022, from 10:30 a.m. through 2:00 p.m., observations on the Unit 1 nursing unit revealed missing molding around the air conditioning unit, a hole in the wall next to the window, the dresser in the middle of the room was missing the handle for the fourth drawer, and the wall behind the television was heavily marred in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wall by the doorway in room [ROOM NUMBER] was marred. The front of the air conditioning unit was missing in room [ROOM NUMBER] and the window was propped open with a bottle of deodorant. In the shared bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], the doorway molding was broken with a jagged edge for room [ROOM NUMBER], the flooring was bowing and curling up, there were three soiled towels on the floor, there were broken tiles around the sink, the towel rack to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review it was determinied that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were complete for 15 of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 6, 10, 30, 43, 53, 58, 59, 65, 71, 94, 104, 112, 121, 123, 124) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Sections C (Brief Interview for Mental Status) and D (Mood Assessment/Interview) of Resident 6's MDS assessment dated [DATE], were incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Sections C and D of Resident 10's MDS assessment dated [DATE], were incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Sections C, D, and J (Pain Assessment Interview) of Resident 30's MDS assessment dated [DATE], were incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Sections C and D of Resident 43's MDS assessment dated [DATE], were incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Sections C and D of Resident 53's MDS assessment dated [DATE], were incomplete. Clinical record review revealed that Sections C and D of Resident 58's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for six of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 14, 59, 104, 115, 121, 124) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on September 6, 2022. According to the assessment the resident had difficulty communicating. The clinical record reflected that the resident's primary language was not English. According to the Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary from that assessment, the facility identified that communication was a problem area for the resident and should have been included on the resident's comprehensive care plan. Review of the care plan revealed that the facility did not develop interventions to address this care area. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 59 had a MDS assessment completed on June 15, 2022. According to the assessment the resident had difficulty with vision. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist conducted medication regimen reviews at least monthly or that the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for five of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 13, 30, 63, 81, 112) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that between September and December 2022, the pharmacist reviewed Resident 13's medication regimen only once, and not monthly. Clinical record review for Resident 30 revealed multiple recommendations from the consultant pharmacist on July 19, August 13 and November 15, 2022. These included recommendations regarding diabetes medications, psychotropic medications, and anticoagulants. There was no documentation that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon these recommendations. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 63's medication regimen was not reviewed in September and October 2022. In an interview on December 2, 2022, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the pharmacist did not review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party or the physician of a significant change in condition for four of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 53, 61, 123, 141) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Nutrition/Unplanned Weight Loss-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that the staff was to report significant weight gains or losses to the physician and the physician would review the resident's weight change for medical causes. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 53 had diagnoses that included dysphagia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the current care plan revealed that Resident 53 was at risk for nutrition problems and an intervention was to notify the physician of significant changes. On August 2, 2022, September 13, 2022, October 12, 2022, and November 3, 2022, Resident 53 had significant weight changes. There was no documented evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the local Area Agency of Aging and the State Survey Agency for of one of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 83) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prevention Program, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that staff was to identify and assess all possible instances of abuse and report any allegations of abuse as required by federal requirements. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 83 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included alcohol abuse and cirrhosis of the liver. Review of the current care plan revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, had a history of alcohol abuse, and was confused and disoriented at times. On November 9, 2022, a nurse noted that Resident 83 was sitting in the hallway in her wheelchair. Resident 10 was observed pouring a bottle of alcohol into Resident 83's mouth without consent. In an interview on December 2, 2022, at 12:40 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a significant change assessment was completed to reflect a change in overall status for one of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 63) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 63 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and hypertension. A physician's order dated October 22, 2022, revealed that the resident started to receive hospice services. There was no documented evidence that a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed after hospice services began. In an interview conducted on December 2, 2022, at 12:00 p.m., RN 1 confirmed that a significant change MDS was not completed and should have been. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening to identify a mental disorder for one of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 6) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental disorder that involves a range of problems with thinking, behavior, and emotions). There was no evidence that the facility completed a Preadmission Screening for Resident 6. In an interview on December 2, 2022, at 1:43 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the screening was not done.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's status after each assessment for three of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 10, 58, 61) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 61 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], following a hospitalization. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified that the resident had experienced a decline in activities of daily living, including no longer being able to walk. Review of the current care plan revealed that it had not been revised to reflect the resident's decline in activities of daily living and included the intervention for a restorative ambulation program. During an interview on November 30, 2022, at 1:40 p.m., Resident 61 confirmed the inability to walk following hospitalization in July and reported he stayed in bed most of the time. The resident was observed in bed three of four days during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with personal grooming and hygiene to one of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 104) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], the resident required extensive assistance from staff for personal hygiene. On November 30, 2022, at 10:45 a.m. and again on December 2, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., the resident was observed with a heavy beard. At that time, the resident stated that he preferred to not have such a long beard, and that staff had not been assisting him with his personal grooming. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for two of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 83, 123) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 83 had diagnoses that included cirrhosis and seizures. On February 9, 2022, a physician ordered that staff to administer a medication (midodrine hydrochloride) three times a day to treat the resident's low blood pressure. Staff was not to give the medication if the resident had a systolic blood pressure of 120 mm/Hg (millimeters of mercury) or more. A review of the October and November 2022, Medication Administration Records revealed that staff administered the medication when the resident's systolic blood pressure was over the established parameter three times in October and eight times in November. In an interview on December 2, 2022, at 12:15 p.m., the Corporate Nurse Consultant, RN 1, confirmed that the documentation indicated that Resident 83 received the midodrine hydrochloride when her systolic blood pressure was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for two of seven sampled residents with limited range of motion. (Residents 14, 104) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had diagnoses that included right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness), contracture of muscle of right hand, and vascular dementia. On September 19, 2022, the physical therapist recommended restorative nursing for passive range of motion of the right upper and lower extremities. On the same day, the physician ordered that staff provide a restorative nursing program five times a week for passive range of motion of the right upper and lower extremities. Review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence to support that the resident received any restorative nursing services in November 2022. Clinical record record review revealed that Resident 104 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff properly secured smoking materials for three of three sampled residents that smoke. (Residents 35, 59, 71) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitiled, Smoking Policy, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that facility staff was to keep cigarettes, electric cigarettes, and lighters in a secure place. In an interview conducted on November 30, 2022, at 1:00 p.m., Employee 1 stated that the smoking materials were to be kept in a secure cart and taken out every smoking break when staff then distribute and light the cigarettes for the residents. On November 30, 2022, at 10:30 a.m., a pack of cigarettes was observed in Resident 35's room on the tray table, not properly secured and accessible to unauthorized residents. On November 30, 2022, at 1:30 p.m., an electric cigarette device was observed in Resident 59's room, not properly secured and accessible to unauthorized residents. In an interview on December 1, 2022, at 10:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents identified with urinary incontinence or an indwelling catheter, failed to provide services to restore bladder function as much as possible, and/or failed to provide proper catheter care for four of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 30 39, 61, 65) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Urinary Catheter Care, last reviewed September 29, 2022, revealed that staff was to provide services to residents in an effort to prevent urinary tract infections and directed that urinary catheter tubing and drainage bags were to be kept off of the floor. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 30 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that he was incontinent of urine and required extensive assistance from staff to use the toilet. According to a bowel and bladder program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely assess the nutritional status of three of nine sampled residents at nutritional risk. (Residents 53, 61, 123) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dysphagia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the current care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for a nutrition problems and an intervention was for the registered dietitian to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. On July 11, 2022, Resident 53 weighed 158.4 pounds (lbs.). On August 2, 2022, the resident weighed 148 lbs., a significant 6.3 percent weight loss. On October 12, 2022, Resident 53 weighed 149.5 lbs. On November 3, 2022, the resident weighted 169 lbs., a significant 13 percent weight gain. There was no documented evidence that the register dietitian evaluated Resident 53's significant weight changes. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 61 had diagnoses that included obesity and high blood pressure. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary interventions to address pain for one of 32 sampled residents. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 94 had diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a condition where the spinal column narrows and compresses the spinal cord) and muscle weakness. Nursing documentation dated November 9, 2022, indicated that there was a physician's verbal order for the resident to have a pain management consultation for spinal stenosis. On November 14, 2022, the physician ordered that staff administer a narcotic pain medication (oxycodone) every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed that the resident had received the as needed narcotic medication 30 times in November since ordered. There was no documentation to support that a pain management consultation had been scheduled or provided. In addition, there was a lack of documentation to support that non-pharmacological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment and monitoring for two of four sampled residents receiving dialysis (process of removing excess toxins and water from the blood). (Residents 115, 123) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 115 had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease and had a physician's order for in-house dialysis three times a week. The resident's care plan included that staff use dialysis communication forms to assess the resident. These forms were to be exchanged between the dialysis center and the nursing unit on days when dialysis was provided. The forms included pre and post dialysis weights, vital signs and recommendations from the center. There was a lack of documented evidence to support that the facility obtained the pre and post dialysis weights and consistently assessed the resident before and after dialysis on 13 of 13 days in November 2022. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 123 had diagnoses that included end-stage renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-10-18 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of transfer(s), including the reasons for the moves and Ombudsman information, in writing upon transfer from the facility for five of five sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 41, 48, 50, 81, 117) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 was transferred to the hospital on August 2 and 16, 2024, after changes in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfers to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 48 was transferred to the hospital on June 25, 2024, after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 50 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information. Findings include: During a tour of the facility on February 27, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., the staffing information that was posted in the lobby was dated for January 23, 2024. During an interview on February 27, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that incorrect staffing data was posted.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-12-02 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) in writing upon transfer from the facility and failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for six of nine residents sampled who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 29, 58, 61, 88, 115, 123) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 29 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and November 27, 2022, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the resident's transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 58 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], July 18, 2022, August 8, 2022, and September 7, 2022, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-12-02 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a qualified full-time social worker for a facility with more than 120 beds. Findings include: During an interview on November 30, 2022, at 10:17 a.m., the Administrator reported that the facility did not have a social worker for the 173 bed facility since approximately the middle of September 2022. At the time of the survey, the in-house census was 134 residents. 211.16(a) Social services.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,753 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,753 — penalty dated 2025-11-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395077. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.