No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windber Woods Senior Living & Rehabilitation Ctr

277 Hoffman Avenue, Windber, PA 15963 · Non profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (814) 467-5505 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 467-5505 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20241 actual-harm citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$27,226 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $27,226 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 Somerset Ave · (814) 467-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
901 Graham Ave · (814) 467-9700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
518 Graham Ave · (814) 467-9506 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Graham Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.1%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.6%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.5%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.1%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.6%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.3%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.791.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.601.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 35.8–57.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.2–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.4–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.52
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
47.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's directions for use, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the manufacture's direction for use, resulting in a significant medication error for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 85), which resulted in Resident 85 requiring medical intervention to correct a critically low blood sugar. Findings include: The manufacturer's direction for use for Insulin Lispro (a rapid acting insulin), dated July 2023, indicated to administer the dose of Insulin Lispro within 15 minutes before a meal or immediately after a meal. The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that medications are to be administered in a safe and legal manner. Medications given need to follow the 5 Rights: right resident, right time, right drug, right frequency, and right route. Pour the medication reading each order on the computer screen and comparing the directions on each medication box. That manufacturer's guidelines will be followed for all rapid,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse or neglect caused by staff failing to properly transport a resident in a wheelchair with leg rests, which led to a resident fall that required sutures for a laceration for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 2). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that staff will be educated on identifying and preventing resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property; staff members will be required at orientation and forward on a yearly basis to attend in-servicing related to abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property. Nurse Aide 1 was educated on the facility's abuse policy on May 9, 2024. The facility's policy on wheelchair safety, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that the residents will be encouraged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of investigation documents and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in a fall that required four sutures. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy on wheelchair safety, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that the residents will be encouraged to self-propel if physically able. If the resident needs to be transported long distances, leg rests will be applied for safety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated September 20, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included anxiety and lumbar disc degeneration (breakdown of discs in spine). A nursing note for Resident 2, dated August 28, 2024, at 12:00 p.m., indicated that the resident had a fall out of her wheelchair and fell forward,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for four of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 13, 14, 92).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding psychotropic medication use, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that non-pharmacological approaches (intervention intended to improve the health or well-being of individuals that do not involve the use of drugs or medicine) are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10 dated January 26, 2025, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include:A facility policy for food storage dated December 18, 2025, revealed that food would be stored closed to open air and that no employee food or drinks would be stored in pantry refrigerators. Observations of the walk in cooler on February 24 ,2026 at 9:09 a.m. revealed a half of a box of dinner rolls and a full box of dough balls open to air. Observations in the prep refrigerator in the kitchen revealed an employee fountain drink that was half full. Observations of the refrigerator in the medication room on Spruce on February 27, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. revealed a cup of [NAME] coffee, a sandwich, two containers of yogurt and an Oikos yogurt drink belonging to an employee. Interview with the Dietary Director on February 24, 2026, at 9:12 a.m. indicated that food should be stored closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) and the treatment alternatives prior to the administration of the medication for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 14). Findings include: A facility policy related to psychotropic medications, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that resident and/or representatives have the right to decline treatment with psychotropic medications. The staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternatives. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 22, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received psychotropic medications, including antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a bruise to rule out neglect and/or abuse for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 61). Findings include: The facility's policy for abuse prohibition, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that the facility will have procedures in place to identify suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns and trends that may constitute abuse. This information may be obtained through or risk management reporting policy currently in place. The facility's policy for risk management reporting, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that all injuries/incidents are required to be reported through risk management in the electronic medical record. This includes abrasions, bruises, skin tears, falls, elopement, and acts of aggression toward other residents. The risk management report is the actual investigation into the cause of the injury or incident and to rule out abuse. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for five of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 68, 92, 97). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Care Planning, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that an interdisciplinary plan of care be established and updated as indicated for every resident in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. The care plan is reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised as indicated by the residents' needs, wishes, or a change in condition.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 22, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received oxygen therapy and had diagnoses that included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure and pneumonia. A care plan for the resident, dated November 16, 2025, indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a professional (registered) nurse assessed a resident after a change in condition for two of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 61 and 95). Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated February 17, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, had a diagnosis of ends stage renal disease and was receiving dialysis (medical treatment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders and clarify physician's orders for four of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 2, 5, 8, 68). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated December 10, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, requires assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had medical diagnosis that included dementia.A Pharmacist recommendation review dated January 16, 2026, revealed that the pharmacist recommendation was to change Resident 2's multivitamin to a multivitamin-M and discontinue vitamin B12, vitamin D, magnesium oxide and folic acid. On January 30, 2026, the physician agreed to the pharmacist recommendation.A review of Resident 2's January 2026 and February 2026 Medication Administration record revealed that the multivitamin was not changed to multivitamin M and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer care/prevention treatments were provided as ordered for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated January 17, 2026, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had medical diagnosis that included stroke, hemiplegia and dementia. Care plan for Resident 3 dated August 5, 2025, indicated that the resident has the potential for pressure ulcer development and required extensive-total assist with bed mobility. An intervention dated January 23, 2026, indicated that the resident was to have B Prevalon boots ( medical devices designed to prevent heel pressure injuries in non-ambulatory, bedridden patients) on all times when in bed, and her skin integrity checked with application and removal.Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 14)Findings include: The facility's policy regarding falls, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that residents identified as fall risks will have interventions in place to prevent further falls. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 14 dated February 27, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, and required assistance for daily care. Resident 8's current care plan, indicated that the resident was at risk for falls. Fall interventions included keeping her personal belongings within reach, and that she would have a reacher tool (used to grab objects that are beyond your reach). Observations of Resident 14 on February 24, 2026, at 10:45 a.m. revealed that the resident was in her wheelchair and did not have her reacher available in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 22, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received oxygen therapy and had diagnoses that included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure and pneumonia. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated November 13, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive oxygen at a flow rate of 1-5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (a small tube that delivers oxygen through the nasal passages) to keep her pulse oximetry (measures blood oxygen levels) greater than 90 percent. May titrate as needed for pulse oximetry less than 90 percent and/or shortness of breath. Observations of Resident 1on February 24, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow facility policy for the care and monitoring of residents receiving dialysis for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 61). Findings include:Review of the facility's dialysis policy, dated December 18, 2025, revealed that when a resident is requiring dialysis an order will be written for the dialysis, place of treatment, port check every shift and as needed, medications to be held prior to dialysis, and any specific orders from dialysis including dietary restrictions, fluid restrictions and intake and output and laboratory studies. The Licensed Practical Nurse/Registered Nurse will monitor the dialysis port or catheter every shift and as needed. The nurse will report any bleeding, redness, inflammation, drainage or catheter dysfunction. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated February 17, 2026, revealed that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated December 18, 2025, indicated that documentation of narcotic administration will be done in accordance with applicable law including documenting necessary medication administration treatment information on appropriate forms, and removal of fentanyl patches (a narcotic medication) will require two signatures to ensure proper disposal of the patch. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a residents abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated January 8, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included Parkinson's (a progressive neurological disease that affects movement). Physician's orders for Resident 12 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent.Findings include: Observations during medication administration on February 26, 2026, and February 27, 2026, revealed that three medication administration errors were made during 38 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 7.89 percent. Manufacturer's directions for Trelegy Ellipta (medication that reduces inflammation in the airways)100-62.5-25 micrograms/activation (mcg/act), dated January 2019, indicated to advise patients to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing after inhalation to reduce the risk of candida albicans, an infection of the mouth and pharynx (throat). Physician's orders for Resident 68, dated February 11, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive one puff (inhalation) of 100-62.5-25 mcg/act of Trelegy Ellipta daily in the morning for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for an invasive procedure to collect a specimen for a laboratory test for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated February 12, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated June 24, 2025 included an order for staff to obtain a urine specimen to rule out a urinary tract infection. A progress note for Resident 4, dated June 24, 2025, revealed that the writer performed a straight catheterization (the manual insertion of a plastic tube into the bladder to drain urine) on the resident at this time to obtain a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity (UA C&S - urine tests to check for the presence of bacteria and determine which antibiotics the bacteria is sensitive to).There was no documented evidence that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending March 27, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 27, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to correct deficient practices related to care plan revision, quality of care, services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers, safe environment that is free of accident hazards, laboratory services, complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications and infection control. The facility's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC - the national health protection agency) and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination related to Clostridioides difficile (C-diff-a bacteria that can cause severe diarrhea and inflammation of the colon) infection for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 11). Findings include: The Facility's policy regarding isolation and transmission-based precautions dated December 18, 2025, indicated that contact precautions are implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces or resident-care items in the resident's environment. Residents with diarrhea and suspected clostridium difficile will be placed on contact precautions while awaiting laboratory results.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (required assessment of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for four of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 41, 60, 102), and failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 52, 82). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that medications are to be administered in a safe and legal manner. Medications given need to follow the 5 Rights, right resident, right time, right drug, right frequency, and right route. Recently a sixth right was implemented. The right documentation. Pour the medication reading each order on the computer screen and comparing the directions on each medication box. After the resident takes the medication, electronically record your signature. Any narcotic medication given must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for the care and maintenance of intravenous catheters and failed to ensure that intravenous catheters were flushed according to facility policy for three of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 45, 255). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding intravenous fluid/medication administration, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that if administering only, flush before and after each infusion or per protocol for the access device. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 1, dated February 26, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood, could understand others, and was receiving intravenous (IV-into the vein) medications. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated February 20, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive a 10 milliliter (ml) flush with normal saline every shift for 12 days for IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address care needs for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: A facility policy for care plans, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that resident care plans will have multiple focuses, goals, and interventions according to their needs, level of care, and capabilities. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 60, dated February 7, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and diagnoses that included high blood pressure and diabetes. Observations of Resident 60 on March 26, 2025, at 8:35 a.m. revealed that he had two containers of smokeless tobacco and an empty milk carton that he was using as a spittoon. There was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address the resident's use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated/revised to reflect specific care needs for three of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 48, 90, 94). Findings include: A facility policy for care plans, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that resident care plans will have multiple focuses, goals, and interventions according to their needs level of care and capabilities. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 48, dated March 5, 2025, revealed that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Physician's orders for Resident 48, dated January 16, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive 70 milligrams (mg) of Gentamicin Sulfate intramuscularly one time a day for three days for a urinary tract infection and contact isolation precautions (used to prevent the spread of infections that can be transmitted through direct or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer dressing changes were completed as ordered to prevent skin breakdown for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 106). Findings include: A facility policy regarding treatment of wounds, dated December 20, 2024, revealed that the facility had a no touch care policy and that staff were to clean and dry a wound and surrounding skin with gauze without letting any unsterile item touch the wound. An admission Minimum Data assessment Set (MDS) (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 106, dated March 13, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood; could sometimes understand; was dependent on staff for turning, transfers, and lower body care; had diagnoses that included a stroke; and had one unstageable pressure ulcer (unable to determine the depth of the wound due to slough or eschar) that was present on admission. A care plan for Resident 106, dated March 6, 2025, revealed that she had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 90) who resides on the alarmed unit. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 90, dated February 3, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was understood and could sometimes understand others, and was ambulatory with a walker or wheelchair. The current care plan for resident 90 revealed that she self-propels in the facility and will take herself to and from activities A nursing note for Resident 90, dated November 2, 2025, at 2:23 p.m. revealed that the resident was found in the basement of the facility. A progress note for Resident 90, dated November 4, 2025, at 10:59 a.m. revealed that the resident was alert to person only, does not follow commands, and was found in the basement over the weekend. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated December 20, 2024, indicated that medications are to be administered in a safe and legal manner. Medications given need to follow the 5 Rights, right resident, right time, right drug, right frequency, and right route. Recently a sixth right was implemented, the right documentation. Staff must sign out the narcotic on the controlled drug record prior to administration of the medication and electronically record their signature in the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) after the resident takes the medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 102, dated March 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's instructions, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store unopened (unused) multi-dose containers of insulin according to manufacturer's instructions for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 74, 85), and failed to label multi-dose containers of medications with the date they were opened in one of two medication carts observed (First-Floor medication cart). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated December 20, 2024, revealed that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed were to be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Manufacturer's directions for the use of Lantus insulin (a long-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels), dated September 2023, revealed that unused Lantus should be stored in a refrigerator between 36 degrees F to 46 degrees F. After initial use it may be kept at temperatures below 86 degrees F for up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 44 residents reviewed (Resident 1), and failed to obtain a physician's order for an invasive procedure to collect a specimen for a laboratory test for two of 44 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 41). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 1, dated March 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and understood others, and had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm). The resident's care plan, dated March 5, 2025, indicated that she was at risk for bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy (providing medication to thin the blood), and she was to have blood tests and medications as ordered by the physician and was to be observed for any bruising or bleeding. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated March 17, 2025, included an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending April 18, 2024, and a complaint investigation survey ending October 23, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending March 27, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to revision of care plans, accident hazards, and pharmacy procedures, services, and records. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding a failure to update residents' care plans, cited during the survey ending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 47, 106). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified timely about a change in condition for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). The facility's policy regarding changes in condition, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that the nurse would notify the resident's physician when there was a change in the resident's condition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included dementia, depression, and Alzheimer's disease. A health status note for Resident 1, dated September 13, 2024, at 9:30 p.m., revealed that the nurse aide updated the licensed practical nurse, who in turn updated the registered nurse supervisor, that the resident was more confused than usual and that the resident's daughter was in to visit earlier in the evening and left early due to the resident swearing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an assessment was completed by a professional (registered) nurse after a change in condition occurred for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The facility's policy for change in condition, dated December 14, 2024, indicated that if a resident has a change in condition, it is the registered nurse's responsibility to assess, chart on, and update the physician regarding that resident's altered condition. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one resident (Resident 7) who had a fall. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated May 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and anxiety. Review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated that on June 19, 2024, the resident was found lying on her right side on the floor with the mattress completely off the bed behind her back. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 3, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that Resident 7's room was cleaned and that the housekeeper did not secure the mattress to the bed with the straps as it should have been. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the kitchen was labeled, dated and secured. Findings include: The facility policy regarding food storage, dated December 14, 2023, revealed that any food that has been opened must be labeled, dated and secured in such a way that the food item is air tight. Observations in the walk-in freezer on April 15, 2024, at 8:35 a.m. revealed that there was one bag containing six chicken tenders that was not labeled, dated or secured and one bag containing five chicken patties that was dated but unsecured. Observations in the cook's cooler on April 15, 2024, at 8:40 a.m. revealed that there was approximately eighteen sausage patties in a box that was dated but the bag holding the sausage patties was open and unsecured. Interview with the Dietary Manager on April 15, 2024, at 8:45 a.m. confirmed that all food items in the kitchen should be labeled, dated and secured. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 15, 2024, at 10:26 a.m. confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding cleaning and disinfecting, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that housekeeping was to remove visible debris from surfaces and that proper cleaning was necessary to provide a healthy environment. A quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated March 12, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism (a blood clot that stops blood flow to the lung) and anemia (not enough red blood cells to carry oxygen to the tissues). A care plan, dated March 14, 2024, indicated that Resident 7 had a potential for altered respiratory status related to her pulmonary embolism and was to receive oxygen as needed at 2 to 4 liters per minute via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 51, dated February 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow). A care plan for Resident 51, revised on February 16, 2024, indicated that the resident had an indwelling foley catheter (tube that is inserted into the bladder allowing urine to drain in to a collection bag) size 16 French, 10 cc balloon. Physician's orders, dated February 2, 2024, included an order to change the size of the indwelling foley catheter to an 18 French, 10 cc balloon. There was no documented evidence in Resident 51's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by transporting a resident without leg rests for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 70), and failed to conduct thorough investigations for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 84) by using photocopied witness statements for fall investigations. Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 70, dated February 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance for all of her care, and used a wheelchair. Observations on April 16, 2024, at 12:47 p.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 3 pushed Resident 70 in a wheelchair without leg rests around other residents who were waiting at the elevator, through the hallway, and into the common area while the resident elevated her feet. The leg rests were in a bag hanging off the back of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a no smoking/oxygen-in-use sign was in place for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that a sign would be in place indicating that oxygen was in use. A quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated March 12, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included pulmonary embolism (a blood clot that stops blood flow to the lung ) and anemia (not enough red blood cells to carry oxygen to the tissues). Physician's orders, dated September 27, 2023, included orders for the resident to receive oxygen as needed at a flow rate of 2 to 4 liters per minute by nasal cannula (tubes that deliver oxygen into the nostrils). The resident's care plan, revised March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding narcotic patches, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that all narcotic patches should be placed immediately in a sharps container when discarding and require a double signature. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 64, dated January 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received routine pain medication, received an opioid (a controlled pain medication), and had diagnoses that included a fracture. Physician's orders for Resident 64, dated January 4, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive a 12 micrograms (mcg) Fentanyl (a narcotic pain patch) patch to be applied every three days for pain. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) and a controlled drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending March 16, 2023, and March 12, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending April 18, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to free of accident hazards/supervision/devices, respiratory care, pharmacy services/procedures/records, and food procurement storage/prepare/serve-sanitary. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding free of accident hazards/supervision/devices, cited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: The facility's policy on pest control, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that the facility will maintain a pest control program and that treatment will be rendered as required to control insects. Observations of the handwashing sink in the kitchen on April 15, 2024, at 8:36 a.m. revealed a large number of ants on the sink around the faucet area, as well as on the wall directly behind the sink. There were also several gnats in the area as well as a gnat trap on the sink by the faucet. Interview with Dietary Manager on April 15, 2024, at 8:38 a.m. revealed that he did not realize that the ants were there. However, he was aware of some gnats in the sink area, as there was a small red container on the sink to catch gnats. He stated that the ants and gnats should not be around the handwashing sink in the kitchen. Interview with Maintenance Director on April 17, 2024, at 9:39 a.m. revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, information provided to staff upon hire, investigation documents, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's personal privacy was maintained for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated December 14, 2023, included policies and procedures related to training, preventative measures, identifying, investigating, reporting, and protecting residents from exposure to abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation. The facility's cell phone usage policy, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that cell phones were not to be used in resident care units or carried on one's body while the employee was working. No staff member was allowed to photograph a resident or their surroundings and post it on social media of any kind. Even if a resident consented, and regardless of the resident's cognitive status, abuse will be presumed and investigated whenever there was a photograph or recording of a resident, or the manner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from mental abuse for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated December 14, 2023, included policies and procedures related to training, preventative measures, identifying, investigating, reporting, and protecting residents from exposure to abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation. The facility's cell phone usage policy, dated December 14, 2023, indicated that cell phones were not to be used in resident care units or carried on one's body while the employee was working. No staff member was allowed to photograph a resident or their surroundings and post it on social media of any kind. Even if a resident consented, and regardless of the resident's cognitive status, abuse will be presumed and investigated whenever there was a photograph or recording of a resident, or the manner that it was used (if it demeaned or humiliated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, residents' clinical records, personnel files, and the licensed practical nurse job description, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the nurse documented treatments accurately for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.148. Standards of nursing conduct (a)(5)(8) indicated that the licensed practical nurse was to document and maintain accurate records. Not to falsify or knowingly make incorrect entries into the patient's record or other related documents. The facility's licensed practical nurse job description, dated May 8, 2018, revealed that the licensed practical nurse was to chart nurses' notes in an informative and descriptive manner that reflects the care provided to the resident, as well as the resident's response to the care, and perform routine charting duties as required and in accordance with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for two of 10 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 6). Findings include: A physician's progress note, dated January 25, 2024, revealed that Resident 4 was seen for a rash on his back that began suddenly and was itchy and red. The plan was to apply 0.025 percent Triamcinolone cream to the rash twice a day; however, there was no physician's order that included the recommended treatment. A review of Resident 4's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for January and February 2024 revealed that there was no documented evidence that Triamcinolone cream was applied to the resident's rash as recommended by the physician. Interview with Registered Nurse 2 on March 11, 2024, at 2:58 p.m. confirmed that she missed the physician's order and did not enter it into the electric medical record. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accident hazards to residents who were at risk for falls for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6), resulting in a fall. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: A significant change in condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated December 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand. The resident's care plan, dated November 2, 2023, revealed that he was at risk for falls related to weakness/balance problems and poor safety awareness, and required assistance but does not always ask for assistance with transfers/ambulation (walking). Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated November 20, 2023, included an order for the resident to always have bed and chair alarms. Staff was to check the function and placement every shift. A nursing note for Resident 6, dated November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of residents' clinical records, personnel files, the licensed practical nurse job description, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 6). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's licensed practical nurse job description, dated May 8, 2018, revealed that the licensed practical nurse was to chart nurses' notes in an informative and descriptive manner that reflects the care provided to the resident, as well as the resident's response to the care. Perform routine charting duties as required and in accordance with the facility's established charting and documentation policies and procedures. Physician's order for Resident 6, dated January 10, 2024, revealed that staff was to cleanse the resident's left shin with wound cleanser, then apply Xeroform gauze (a sterile, non-adhering protective dressing consisting of absorbent, fine-mesh gauze impregnated with a petrolatum) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed issue a bed-hold notice at the time of an anticipated leave of absence from the facility for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: A discharge with return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 5, 2023, required supervision with personal hygiene needs, required extensive assistance with toileting and dressing, and had diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of the left hip. Nurse's notes for Resident 2, dated September 5, 2023, at 6:02 a.m. revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital for a scheduled surgery. There was no documented evidence that the resident and/or the responsible party was notified about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of this transfer to the hospital. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 23, 2023, at 11:11 a.m. confirmed that there was no documented evidence that a bed-hold notice was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit the readmission of a hospitalized resident without providing evidence that the facility was not able to meet the resident's needs for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: admission information for Resident 2 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of the left hip and dementia. A nursing note, dated July 18, 2023, indicated that the resident was scheduled for hip surgery on September 5, 2023. A nurse's note, dated September 5, 2023, at 6:02 a.m. revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital for a scheduled surgery. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 23, 2023, at 11:11 a.m. revealed that the facility decided not to allow Resident 2 to return to the facility because her responsible party refused to pay for a bed hold and the resident had a bill for room and board that was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the consistent implementation of infection control procedures designed to prevent the spread of infection. Findings include: Facility policy for handwashing, dated December 14, 2022, included that all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Hand hygiene should be performed before applying gloves and after removing and discarding gloves. Observations on the Maple nursing unit on September 20, 2023, at 11:20 a.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 1 was wearing gloves as she pushed a resident in a wheelchair. After placing the resident in front of a table in the center common area of the unit, Nurse Aide 1 removed her gloves, discarded them in a garbage receptacle and picked up a plastic cup from the medication cart in the hallway. The nurse aide then put water in the cup, opened the wrapper of a straw, and placed the straw in the water and gave it to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$27,226 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-03-27
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-10-23
  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FRIEDMAN, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
KOHN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
ZYTMAN, SHMUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
HALPERT, NAOMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2020
GRAY, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2018
SMORTO-DUKERY, DANIELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
PEASE BELL CPAS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
SHIFTSTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 7%Other / private 12%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$442per resident / day
operating cost
$13,426per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$427per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395090. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next