Passavant Retirement And Healt
105 Burgess Drive, Zelienople, PA 16063 · Non profit - Church related · 102 certified beds · (724) 452-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.8% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.9% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.49 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 42.0–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.7–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.5–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 96.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.55 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.454 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.74 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, review of clinical records, review of hospital records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician-ordered bowel protocol for one of six residents (Resident R10) reviewed, which required hospitalization and actual harm resulting in fecal impaction, and failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate preventative treatments for skin care for one of three residents (Resident R92). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bowel Management dated 1/26/26, indicated it recognizes its obligation to assure that each resident is assessed and managed for adequate bowel elimination. Clinical record review revealed Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include malignant neoplasm of prostate (uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells in the prostate gland), retention of urine and diabetes mellitus. Review of physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documents, facility policies, clinical records, employee education, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not ensuring a safe transfer, which resulted in actual harm (abrasion to right forehead and a right nondisplaced tibial (leg) plateau fracture with pain) for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility Abuse, Neglect, Mental Abuse, Reports of Theft, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property policy dated 1/2025, indicated that facility will provide a safe and secure environment for all residents and will protect a resident's right to be free from any form of abuse, mental abuse, and neglect. Facility prohibits any form of resident abuse or neglect. Review of facility Abuse, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse, Neglect, Mental Abuse, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy dated 1/2025, indicated facility will not condone any form of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, incident reports, facility documents, employee education, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a preventable accident during a transfer, which resulted in actual physical harm (an abrasion to right forehead and a right nondisplaced tibial (leg) plateau fracture with pain) for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of the facility Accidents and Incidents policy dated 1/2025, indicated that the facility will provide a safe and secure environment in order to prevent incidents and accidents from occurring.Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 8/2/25, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dish room which created the potential for cross contamination in one of three households. (Mountain Laurel, Brandywine). Findings include: Review of facility policy Infection control for Household Dish room dated 1/26/26 indicated household dish rooms are appropriately disinfected. During an observation of dish room on 2/24/26, at 10:00 a.m. it was revealed two fans area above clean side of dish machine area had a build up of a black substance, dirt and grime on the mountain laurel, brandywine household. During an interview on 2/24/26, at 10:30 a.m. the Household Coordinator Employee E15 confirmed the brown substance on the fans in the dish room and that it has the potential to create cross contamination and food borne illness. 28 Pa Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R5 and R102), and failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for three of three residents (Residents R5, R102, and R104).Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer to Hospital/Emergency and Non-Emergency dated January 2026, indicated when medically indicated and desired by the resident (or by resident representative, if appropriate), resident will be transferred to the hospital with all necessary information to insure continuity of care. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/26/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain informed consent before installation of bed rails for three of three residents (Residents R59, R72, and R94).Findings include: Review of facility policy Mobility Bars/Bedrails dated January 2026, indicated residents who attempt to exit a bed through, between, or over or around mobility bars or bed rails are at risk of injury or death. The benefits-to-risk ration of using a potentially restraining device must always be considered, and therefore staff and resident and/or family member must be educated about the risks of the device being considered in a comprehensive person-centered care plan. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R59's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/6/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyponatremia (low levels of sodium in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for three of six medication rooms (Larkspur, Allegheny and Tionesta medication rooms).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed January 2026, indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly. Medication storage areas are kept clean, well lit, and free of clutter. During an observation completed on 2/24/26, at 12:19 p.m. the Larkspur Hall medication room contained: A black winter coatA black jacketA brown print bag containing a thermosOne tube of ostomy paste that failed to be labeled with a name or date opened as required and an expiration date of 9/1/24. During an interview completed on 2/24/26, at 12:32 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11 confirmed the observations and stated, the coat, jacket and bag are mine; I think the ostomy paste is Resident R51's. During an observation completed on 2/24/26, at 12:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for five of seven staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3, Food Service Assistant (FSA) Employee E4, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5, Agency NA Employee E6, and NA Employee E7).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for four of seven staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3, Food Service Assistant (FSA) Employee E4, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5 and Agency NA Employee E6).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours annually of continued education from in-services or seminars,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Dementia Management for four of seven staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E1, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2, Food Service Assistant (FSA) Employee E4, and NA Employee E5), and failed to ensure that two of four sampled Nurse Aides received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year (NA Employee E5 and Agency NA Employee E6).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Behavioral Health for six of seven staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E1, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2, Food Service Assistant (FSA) Employee E4, NA Employee E5, Agency NA Employee E6, and NA Employee E7).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours annually of continued education from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain residents were provided necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for a pressure ulcer (PU/PIs- injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for two of three residents (Resident R1, and R92).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Treatment of Wounds last reviewed January 2025 indicated that the facility will provide the treatment ordered by the physician. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/4/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and chronic pain. Section M0300 indicated that a stage four pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility policies, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the use of a suprapubic catheter (a thin flexible tube inserted through a small incision in the lower abdomen directly into the bladder to drain urine) as required for one of three residents (Resident R51).Findings include: Review of the facility Catheters Care; Urinary last reviewed 1/2026. Indicated the purpose of this procedure is to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract. If the catheter material is contributing to obstruction, notify the physician and change the catheter if instructed to do so. Catheter irrigation may be ordered to prevent obstruction in residents at risk for obstruction. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of needs) dated 1/21/26, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for care of an urostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen wall to allow urine to exit the body when the bladder is not functioning properly) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R7).Findings include: Review of facility policy Colostomy/Ileostomy/Urostomy Care last reviewed January 2026, indicated the purpose is to provide guidelines that will aid in preventing exposure of the resident's skin to fecal matter or urine. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R7s Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/11/26, indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and depression. Section H0100 appliances indicated ostomy (including urostomy, ileostomy, and colostomy) present. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccination for one of five residents (Resident R88).Findings include: Review of facility policy Immunization Program dated January 2026, indicated when COVID-19 vaccine is available to the facility each resident will be offered the vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. Upon admission, if the above criteria is not met, reach Resident/Resident Representative will be provided educational material regarding the benefits and the risks of the COVID-19 vaccine. After reviewing educational information and the Immunization consent form, upon admission, the Resident/Resident Representative will sign the Immunization Consent form indicating their choice to accept or decline the COVID-19 vaccine. All documentation of acceptance or refusal must be transcribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Effective Communication for one of seven staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of LPN Employee E3's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 3/31/21. Review of LPN Employee E3's personnel file did not include annual in-service training on Effective Communication from 3/31/24 through 3/31/25. During an interview on 2/25/26, at 1:24 p.m. Clinical Nurse Educator Employee E8 confirmed that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for two of seven staff members (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E3 and Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Registered Nurses (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurses dated January 2026, indicated RNs and LPNs will be provided with opportunities to acquire annual continued education from in-services, self-studies, or seminars. Each nurse is responsible to attend in-services each anniversary year. The nurse will notify the Nursing Educator ahead of time if in-services are needed to meet their annual anniversary deadline. Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours annually of continued education from in-services or seminars, as required by OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation for one of seven staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours annually of continued education from in-services or seminars, as required by OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations. The facility has high standards for the team members and has an obligation to provide continued training and education to help team members perform their jobs effectively. The nurse aide is required to complete the 12 hours of annual continued education prior to their annual review. Review of NA Employee E5's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 11/4/20. Review of NA Employee E5's personnel file did not include annual in-service training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation from 11/4/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility in-service documentation, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for one of seven staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5).Findings include: Review of facility policy Inservice - Mandatory Hours for Nurse Aides dated January 2026, indicated Nurse Aides will be provided with opportunities to acquire at least 12 hours annually of continued education from in-services or seminars, as required by OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) regulations. The facility has high standards for the team members and has an obligation to provide continued training and education to help team members perform their jobs effectively. The nurse aide is required to complete the 12 hours of annual continued education prior to their annual review. Review of NA Employee E5's personnel file indicated a date of hire on 11/4/20. Review of NA Employee E5's personnel file did not include annual in-service training on Infection Control from 11/4/24 through 11/4/25. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report and investigate an allegation of physical abuse for two of three residents. Findings include: Abuse, is defined at §483.5 as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Review of Closed Record Resident R1 (CRR1) indicated admission to the facility on 4/4/22. Review of Resident CRR1's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/12/25, indicated the diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to determine the ability to self-administer medications for one of three residents (Residents R51). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication-Self-Administration January 2025, indicates residents have the right to self-administer medications as long as it is determined that it is safe for them to do so. Self-administration will refer to residents who do not need any assistance or reminders in order to take their medications. If the resident indicates that they are requesting the right to self-administer their own medications, a licensed nurse must complete an assessment for self-administration of medications and the attending physician will be notified within 24 hours. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R51's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/10/24, indicates the diagnosis of anemia (low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, documents, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a non-institutional dining experience by administering medications during the breakfast meal service for two of six residents. (Resident R3 and Resident R66). Findings include: A review of facility policy Supporting the Resident's Right to Privacy and Confidentially last reviewed January 2025, indicates it is the responsibility of each employee of this community to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of each resident is protected. A review of the facility policy Medication Administration - General Guidelines last reviewed January 2025, indicates for residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the medication administration record (MAR) is flagged. After completing the medication pass, the nurse returns to the missed resident to administer the medication. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for two of four residents (Resident R46 and R86). Findings include: Review of facility policy medication management dated January 2025, indicated The interdisciplinary team reviews the resident's medication regimen for efficacy and actual or potential medication -related problems on an on-going basis. Resident R46 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R46 MDS (minimum data set a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 1/15/25, indicated a diagnosis of dementia (dementia is a term for several diseases that affect memory, thinking and the ability to perform daily activities) and depression (is a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act). Review of Resident R46 physician orders indicated to administer: Quetiapine (antipsychotic used for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications, and properly store/label medication in three of three medication rooms (Mountain Laurel, Tionesta, and Trillium Medication Rooms), failed to discard expired nursing supplies in one of three medication rooms (Tionesta Medication Room), and failed to properly store medications in one of three residents' medication cabinet in the resident room (Resident R77). Findings include: Review of facility policy Preparation and General Guidelines - Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications dated [DATE], indicated opening a vial triggers a shortened expiration date that is unique for that product. It is important to record the date opened and the triggered expiration date on a multi-dose vial. Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications dated [DATE], indicated all medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label. Medications labeled for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement (A binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.) for one of five residents (Resident R67). Findings include: Review of the admission record indicated Resident R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R67's Binding Arbitration Agreement indicated that the resident signed the document on 1/13/25. Review of Resident R67's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/20/25, indicated the diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (dementia caused by other diseases with symptoms forgetfulness, limited social skills, and impaired thinking abilities that interfere with daily functioning), diabetes (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure droplet precautions were ordered and a care plan implemented for one of three residents (Resident R40), and failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential for cross contamination for one of six household kitchen areas (Mountain Laurel Neighborhood). Findings include: Review of the facility policy COVID-19 Plan dated January 2025, indicated the facility will make every attempt to reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 in order to protect those it serves, its personnel, volunteers and visitors. In the event transmission does occur, prompt detection and effective triage and isolation of infectious residents are essential to prevent unnecessary exposure. Transmission-based precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are used in addition to standard precautions for residents with known or suspected infections. There are three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision transfers for one of six residents (Resident R1), which resulted in a fall. Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 11/21/24, indicated diagnoses of right fibula fracture, anxiety and depression. Review of Resident R1's physician orders dated 12/5/24 indicated toilet transfer to be completed assist x 2. Review of Resident R1's profile/preference (tool nursing staff uses for transfer status, ADL assistance) indicated assist x 2 for toileting. Review of a progress note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 dated 12/29/24, at 9:45 p.m. indicated While Nurse Aid (NA) was transferring resident on to the commode resident slipped and lost her balance and fell in her bathroom, she hit back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in one elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Elopement Protocol dated 1/24, indicated to promote the safety of all residents and maintains a process to assess residents for risk of elopement, implement prevention strategies for those identified as an elopement risk and conduct a missing resident protocol. Review of the facility's policy Accidents and Incidents-Investigation and Reporting dated 1/24, indicated will provide a safe and secure environment in order to prevent incidents and accidents from occurring. Review of Residents R1's clinical record indicated admission to facility to on 6/29/24. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from neglect by not providing a two-person transfer per physician's order for one of four residents (Resident R1) resulting in a fall. Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse, Neglect, Mental Abuse, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property last reviewed January 2024, indicated neglect is defined as failure or omission by employees of this community, the resident's legal representative, or family of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Each resident living in this community has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of their property. Review of facility policy Abuse, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mental Abuse, Reports of Theft, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and interview, the facility failed to have a physician's order, and a care plan, for the use of an indwelling catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine), for one of four residents (Resident R193), and failed to ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided for two of four residents (Resident R67 and R73) with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: Review of facility policy Catheter Care; Urinary dated 1/23/24, indicated to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. It is suggested to change catheters and drainage bags based on clinical indications, and a physician's order. Review of the Centers for Disease Control guidance Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections updated 6/6/19, indicated to keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for five of five residents (Residents R6, R14, R31, R32, and R34). Findings include: Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.25(n) - Bed Rails states that the facility must assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Additionally, there should be evidence in the resident's records that the facility performed ongoing assessments to assure that the bed rail is used to meet the resident's needs and that there is an ongoing evaluation of risks associated with bed rail usage. Review of facility policy Mobility Bars/Bedrails dated 1/23/24, indicated before a resident is fitted with mobility bars or bed rails, an interdisciplinary team must determine the presence of a specific medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of resident's medical information on one of six nursing households (second floor Tionesta household). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Use of Laptops or other portable computers, last reviewed on 1/23/24, indicated that resident information should be kept confidential. The computer screen should be turned so that only the resident or resident's family can see the screen. Keep the lid partially closed if resident data is displayed and information is not actively being documented. No resident data should be displayed if information is not actively being documented. Review of facility policy Medication Administration-General Guidelines, last reviewed on 1/23/24, indicate privacy is always maintained for all resident information by closing computer screen when not in use. During an observation on 3/26/24, at 11:58 a.m., the medication cart/portable computer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received neurological assessment after an incident involving a fall for two of five residents (Resident R9 and Resident R69). Findings include: Review of facility policy Falls - Resident Treatment Of dated 1/23/24, indicated a fall will refer to an incident when a resident drops to the floor suddenly or if a resident moves from one plane to another. Incidents that are considered a fall are when a resident is slowly and gently lowered to the floor, or when a resident slowly and purposefully lies or sits on the floor. If the resident is on the floor and the incident was unobserved, staff is to presume that it was a fall and proceed accordingly. When there is doubt, an incident should be considered a fall. Review of facility policy Neurological Assessment - Using the Flowsheet dated 1/23/24, indicated that a Neurological Review Flowsheet will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, resident observations and interviews, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a physician order for use of and cleaning of a Bi-PAP/CPAP machine (machines used to make breathing easier) and failed to develop a plan of care for one of three residents (Resident R58). Findings include: Review of the policy Respiratory Care Documentation dated 1/23/24, indicated nurses will be responsible for completing the eTAR (electronic treatment administration record), for any resident who has physician orders CPAP, Bi-PAP therapy. Review of the policy Respiratory Care Equipment Changes dated 12/12/23, indicated CPAP/BIPAP maintenance included the following: mask cleaning, headgear (helps secure the mask around the nose, mouth, or both to prevent pressure leaks during sleep) cleaning, tubing cleaning, humidifier chamber cleaning, filter cleaning, and replacement of worn-out components. Review of the admission record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined to facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of one residents (Resident R69). Findings include: Review of facility policy Trauma-Informed Care dated 1/23/24, indicated the facility will provide culturally competent, trauma-informed care across all disciplines to mitigate potential triggers for nursing residents who have experienced past or present trauma. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/18/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure a medication drawer on four occasions in one of six households (Tionesta household). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration-General Guidelines, last reviewed 1/23/24, indicate during administration of medications, the medication cart /portable computer unit is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. During an observation on 3/26/24, 11:58 a.m., outside room [ROOM NUMBER] the portable computer unit medication drawer was left open, unattended, and out of site of the medication nurse. During an observation on 3/26/24, 12:10 p.m., outside room [ROOM NUMBER] the portable computer unit medication drawer was left open, unattended, and out of site of the medication nurse. During an interview on 3/26/24, at 12:17 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E7 confirmed the above findings. During an observation on 3/27/24, 8:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential for cross contamination during finger stick blood sugar monitoring for one of two residents (Resident R301) and failed to complete hand hygiene after a finger stick blood sampling on one of two residents (Resident R299) Findings include: Review of facility policy Hand Hygiene/Handwashing last reviewed on 1/23/24, indicate it is the policy of Passavant Community that all staff will follow the principles of good hand hygiene. Appropriate times to use hand hygiene include but are not limited to the following: - Before and after performing a task that includes hand washing in the procedure. For example, before and after performing a task that includes any invasive procedure, finger stick blood sampling, inserting urinary catheters, caring for vascular catheters, and changing dressing. Review of facility policy Diabetes-Glucometer last reviewed 1/23/24, indicate after completion of finger stick dispose of lancet, gloves and used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-02-27 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have required postings for the facility in areas that are accessible to all residents with complete contact information for State Agency, Adult Protective Services, Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program posted in six of six neighborhoods (Brandywine, Mountain Laurel, Trillium, Tionesta, Allegheny, and Larkspur). Findings include: During an observation on 2/26/26, from 9:30 a.m. through 9:45 a.m. in all six neighborhoods there was a variety of information posted for residents. This information failed to include address, and email address for State Agency, and for Adult Protective Services, and failed to include an email address for Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and also failed to include a name, address, and email for the Ombudsman as required. During an interview on 2/27/26, at 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to have required postings in areas that are accessible to all residents with complete contact information for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CARRAWAY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/27/2021 |
| FENOGLIETTO, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/27/2021 |
| ROY, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/25/2025 |
| LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/1986 |
| GARRETT, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/20/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395001. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.