Harris Health Care Center North
60 Eben Brown Lane, Central Falls, RI 02863 · For profit - Corporation · 32 certified beds · (401) 722-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,033 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.0% | 19.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 17.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 16.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.2% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.4% | 22.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 45.3% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 31.8 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.48 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying skin usually over a boney prominence), Resident ID #26. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled, Skin Care Policy states in part, .This facility will follow appropriate standards of care as they relate to residents' skin care; identification of those at risk, weekly skin checks, and appropriate interventions and documentation . 4. The weekly skin assessments (documented in the treatment sheet record) will be done for every resident regardless of their risk score . 6. Monitoring: Weekly skin assessments will be done . With each dressing change or at least weekly, the following documentation must be present: -Location and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's right to be free from involuntary seclusion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident that was reported to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 2/4/2026 revealed in part, Registered Nurse, Staff A, placed a medication cart in front of the door of Resident ID #1's room. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses to include, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and dementia.Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reveals a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) coded as 99, indicating that s/he is unable to complete the interview due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further reveals that the resident exhibits wandering behaviors daily.Record review of a progress note dated 2/3/2026 at 4:10 PM, authored by the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to inform residents how to file a grievance or complaint. Additionally, the facility failed to implement the grievance policy to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances, for 9 of 9 residents reviewed during the Resident Council meeting, Resident ID #s 4, 6, 9,14, 20, 22, 24, 26, and 29.Findings are as follows:Review of an undated document titled Grievance procedure/Conflict Resolution states in part, .Any person with a grievance, complaint or concern is urged to complete a 'Grievance/Complaint form' that is available at each nurses' station or voice it directly to the Administrator/designee .staff members are responsible to assist as necessary.the grievance/complaint is to be directed to the department head responsible to investigate it.the department head is to complete the investigation and provide a written response to it within 3 business days of receipt. A copy of the response is to go to the person filing the grievance/ complaint.During the Resident Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen.Findings are as follows:1) Record review of the FDA Food Code, 2022 Edition, Section 3-501.17 states in part, .READY -TO-EAT-TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and help in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius or 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1 .During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 12/3/2025 at approximately 8:40 AM, with the Food Service Director (FSD), the following was observed: - One opened 5.3-ounce (oz) container of Light and Fit brand apple pie flavored yogurt, without a discard date - Two ready to use pie crusts, without a discard date - Two 7.25 oz. boxes of macaroni and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life relative to making a good faith attempt to correct deficiencies related to trauma informed care and the cleanliness of the kitchen. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement dated 1/1/2018 states in part, The QAPI plan has been established to provide a planned, systemic, and ongoing quality improvement process designed to objectively monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care and to pursue opportunities for organizational improvement.1) Record review of a 2567 (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Statement of Deficiencies) dated 10/11/2024 revealed that the facility was cited for trauma informed care. Additional review of the 2567 revealed that the facility submitted a plan of correction to the Rhode Island Department of Health on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to the storage of staff insulin in the main kitchen, failed to clean with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved disinfectant, failed to prevent the spread of infection during 1 of 1 wound observation for Resident ID #5, and failed to report a cluster of scabies to the Rhode Island Department of Health affecting Resident ID #'s 11, 14, 23, 28 and 30. Furthermore, the facility failed to implement a water management program (WPM) based upon industry standards and/or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and to perform and document specified testing for the prevention of Legionella disease (a very serious type of lung infection caused by the bacteria called Legionella which can be found in water).Findings are as follows:1) Record review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, 2022 Edition, Section 7-207.12 states in part, .Medicines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained relative to privacy of personal needs for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for the use of adult protective underwear, Resident ID #s 3, 16, 24, 28, and 31.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights states in part, .As a resident you will be treated in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, ensuring dignity .Right to Privacy and Confidentiality: during treatment and care of one's personal needs .During a surveyor observation on 12/3/2025 at 12:17 PM, of the first-floor main hallway, signage was noted to be posted on the exterior door to the resident care supply closet. The signage revealed the following residents are to use pull-ups and all other residents are to use briefs: - Resident ID #3 - Resident ID #16 - Resident ID #24 - Resident ID #28 - Resident ID #31During a surveyor interview on 12/3/2025 at 10:49 AM, with Resident ID #28, s/he indicated that his/her privacy was important,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic drug usage is based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, and that residents who use psychotropic drugs (medications that are prescribed to affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) receive gradual dose reductions (GDR) and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a GDR, Resident ID #31.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/1/2025 revealed, Resident ID #31, the perpetrator, was trying to keep Resident ID #29 from speaking to a female resident and there was a physical altercation.Record review revealed Resident ID #31 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. The resident was discharged from the facility on 11/28/2025.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdominal wall to allow urine to exit the body bypassing an injured or non functioning bladder), Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was readmitted to the facility in April of 2025, with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the bladder (bladder cancer).Record review of a Continuity of Care Consultation and Referral (COC), form dated 10/8/2025 revealed, the resident attended an appointment at the Cancer Institute and returned to the facility with recommendations and a prescription to start methenamine (an antibacterial medication primarily used to prevent and treat urinary tract infections (UTIs), 1 gram twice a day. Further review of the COC revealed to start methenamine for UTI prevention.Review of the resident's record failed to reveal evidence that the recommendation was reviewed with the Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 2 of 3 resident reviewed with a history of trauma, Resident ID #s 3 and 16.Findings are as follows:Review of the facility's form titled PC [Primary Care]-PTSD [Post Traumatic Stress Disorder]-5 states in part, .The primary PC-PTSD-5 is a 5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD .Review of a facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care revealed in part, .A trauma screening assessment will be done on each resident by the social worker as part of the admission social history. When it is not practical or possible to interview the resident, information will be obtained from family members.when they are able and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0710 — patternObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed following an admission from home, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed that Resident ID #2 was readmitted to the facility in April of 2025, with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of the bladder (bladder cancer).Record review revealed the resident was a former resident of the facility. The resident was discharged home in December of 2024 and was readmitted in April of 2025.Review of the resident's medical record failed to reveal evidence of a written recommendation for admission to the facility, including admission orders, summary of care, medication regime, preadmission screening and a resident review for the April 2025 admission. Further review of the physician's orders revealed an unsigned order to admit the resident to the facility for a prior admission in 2023. Additionally, of the active physician orders for the resident, 26 of the resident's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotics, Resident ID #7. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, cellulitis (a common bacterial skin infection) of the left upper limb. Record review of an acute care hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed, a physician's order for Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (an antibiotic prescribed to treat a wide range of bacterial infections, made up of two separate antibiotic's) 875-125 milligram (mg) tablet, twice a day, for seven days, from 10/4/2025 through 10/10/2025.Record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2025 revealed, an order for amoxicillin (an antibiotic used to treat simpler and common infections) 875 mg, twice a day, with a start date of 10/4/2025 and a discontinue date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 25 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task, there were 4 errors resulting in an error rate of 16% affecting Resident ID #s 2, 5, and 10. Findings are as follows:1) Record review revealed Resident ID #2 has a physician's order for Magnesium 200 milligram (MG) with instructions to administer 2 tablets, every day.During a surveyor observation during the medication administration task on 12/3/2025 at approximately 12:10 PM with Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff C, she was administered 1 tablet of Magnesium Oxide 400 MG, to ID #2.During a surveyor interview with Staff C, immediately following the above observation she acknowledged administering Magnesium Oxide instead of Magnesium as ordered stating, that's what I always give. 2a) Record review revealed Resident ID #5 has a physician's order for Lactulose 10 Gram (GM) packet with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a hospital recommendation, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of acute care hospital discharge orders, dated 10/9/2025 revealed, an order to discontinue Metoprolol XL (a long-acting form of medication taken daily to treat high blood pressure) 25 milligram (mg) daily and start Metoprolol Succinate (a long-acting form of medication taken daily to treat high blood pressure) 50 mg daily. Record review of a physician order with a start date of 10/9/2025 revealed an order for Metoprolol Tartrate (an immediate-release/short-acting form of medication taken at least twice a day to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg daily. Record review of the Medication Administration Record from October 9, 2025, through December 4, 2025, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration the individual needs of 2 of 2 residents reviewed for modified diets, Resident ID #s 13 and 15, and to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for all residents. Findings are as follows:During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 12/3/2025 at approximately 8:40 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) revealed that he works 7 days per week to provide all three meals to the residents, with an average work week of 60-65 hours per week. Additionally, he revealed that he receives some assistance from a Dietary Aid/Cook, Staff E. He further revealed that Staff E maintained a Food Handlers Certification, and not a Food Managers Certification, as required, to work independently, to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services.Record review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality and practices relative to 1 of 1 resident observed during wound care, Resident ID #5.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed that Resident ID #5 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2025, with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes.Record review revealed a physician's order dated 12/2/2025 to cleanse the sacral (coccyx) wound with wound wash, apply silver sulfadiazine (a wound cream) to the open area, then apply calcium alginate dressing (an absorbent dressing which creates a gel like substance that maintains a moist wound environment. Correctly sizing the dressing helps effectively manage fluid, prevent damage to surrounding skin, and promote an optimal healing environment).Review of Resident ID #5's care plan, last revised on 6/17/2025, revealed that s/he has pressure ulcers or vascular wounds to the buttocks with interventions including, but not limited to, keep the skin clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for a change in condition related to bleeding, Resident ID #s 5 and 16.Findings are as follows:1) Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was admitted to the facility in June of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy (when urine cannot flow through the urinary tract due to a blockage) and thrombocytopenia (a deficiency of platelets in the blood that causes bleeding).Record review of a progress note dated 11/24/2025 at 2:20 PM revealed, Resident ID #5 was noted to be bleeding from his/her genitalia, and a urology appointment should be scheduled.Record review failed to reveal evidence that the provider was notified, that a treatment was initiated, or that a urology consult was scheduled for Resident ID #5.During a surveyor interview on 12/5/2025 at 10:11 AM with the Medical Director, he revealed that he does not remember if he was notified about Resident ID #5's bleeding and would expect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility's policy dated 11/13/2015 and titled, Oxygen Administration states in part, .Maintenance of Equipment.cannulas [a tubing that delivers oxygen through the nose] are to be changed as needed and at least weekly.Documentation.Document the date, time, amount, and method of oxygen administration.Ensure that there is evidence of oxygen administration for the duration of the therapy.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease) and tracheostomy status (a patient having a surgically created opening in their windpipe for breathing). Review of a physician's order dated 10/9/2025 revealed an order for oxygen 2-4 liters (L) as needed. During surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles relative to 1 of 2 medication carts observed and 1 resident observed with medication at the bedside, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals with a revision date of 6/30/2025, states in part, .Facility should ensure all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors.Once any medication or biological packed is opened, facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications.1) Surveyor observation of the medication cart on 12/4/2025 at 8:01 AM, in the presence of Registered Nurse, Staff A revealed, a Lantus insulin (a medication used to treat diabetes) pen opened and dated 10/1. Manufacturer instructions indicate to discard the insulin pen 28 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility continues to fail to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve pain caused by high blood sugar levels), tracheostomy status, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and schizophrenia.Record review revealed the following physician's orders:Amantadine HCl (a medication prescribed to treat sudden, uncontrolled movements), 100 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet twice per day, dated 12/7/2025Divalproex (an anticonvulsant medication prescribed to treat seizures and symptoms of bipolar disorder), delayed release, 250 mg, 1 tablet once per day, dated 10/9/2025Divalproex, delayed release, 500 mg, 1 tablet once per day, dated 10/9/2025Eliquis (a blood thinner), 5 mg, 1 tablet twice per day, dated 10/9/2025Gabapentin (a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation that the resident either received the pneumococcal vaccination or did not receive the vaccination due to medical contraindications or refusal, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 6 and 27 Additionally, the facility failed to have updated policies regarding immunizations.Findings are follows:According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical conditions or 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23 (a type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination), the PCV15 ( type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) or PCV20 (a type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) dose should be administered at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. For adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical indications who have only received PCV13 (a type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for smoking for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who are smokers, Resident ID #s 10 and 23. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #10 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and autistic disorder. Record review of the list of smokers provided by the facility revealed the resident is a smoker. Record review failed to reveal evidence that a smoking evaluation was completed upon admission or quarterly. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a comprehensive care plan that identifies the resident as a smoker which includes safety interventions. During a surveyor interview on 10/10/2024 at 12:45 PM with Resident ID #10, s/he revealed that s/he is a smoker. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #23 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a history of trauma, Resident ID #10. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility's form titled PC [Primary Care]-PTSD [Post Traumatic Stress Disorder]-5 states in part, .The primary PC-PTSD-5 is a 5-item screen designed to identify individuals with probable PTSD. Those screening positive require further assessment, preferably with a structured interview . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, major depressive disorder, personality disorder and autistic disorder. Review of the Primary Care PTSD Screen dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident ID #s 1. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the pharmacy recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) (psychotropic medications are required by federal guidelines in skilled nursing facilities) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #23. Findings are as follows: 1a. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease damaging the central nervous system), bladder cancer, constipation and generalized muscle weakness. Record review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 8/1/2024 for Baclofen (a medication prescribed to treat muscle spasms) 10 milligrams (mg) tablets, take 2 tablets four times a day at 8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM and 8 PM. Record review of the August, September, and October 2024 Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to accurately document bowel movements (BM) in the resident's medical record for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for constipation, Resident ID #s 1 and 5. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy titled Bowel Function Management states in part, It is the facility's policy to manage each resident's bowel function in order to promote regular, voluntary, controlled bowel evacuation of normal consistency .Every resident's bowel function is to be monitored every day on every shift .The CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] is responsible to document the resident's BMs in the resident's electronic medical record or in the CNA flow charts as appropriate . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that damages the protective coating around nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to wound care, Resident ID #22 and 1 of 1 resident observed receiving medications, Resident ID #16. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . Record review revealed Resident ID #22 was admitted to the facility in January of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cellulitis of the right and left lower extremities and non-pressure chronic venous ulcers (wounds to the lower extremities due to poor circulation of the blood). Record review of a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Score Assessment (a risk assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, .Storage and expiration dating of medication and biological's last revised on [DATE] states in part, .Facility should ensure that medications and biological's that .have an expired date on the label .have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines .are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier . During a surveyor observation of the medication storage room on [DATE] at 10:43 AM, in the presence of the Certified Medication Technician, Staff B, the following was observed: - Four, 16-ounce bottles of lactulose (a medication used to treat constipation) with a manufacturer's expiration date of 8/2024. - Two sealed 0.5 fluid ounce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement their smoking policy in accordance with federal, state, and local laws for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking, Resident ID #10. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy titled, Smoking Policy states in part, .Residents who wish to smoke are to be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team for their ability to smoke in a safe manner .on admission .at least quarterly . Record review revealed Resident ID #10 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and autistic disorder. Record review of the list of smokers provided by the facility revealed the resident is a smoker. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a smoking evaluation upon admission or quarterly. During a surveyor interview on 10/10/2024 at 12:45 PM with the resident, s/he revealed that he is a smoker. During a surveyor interview on 10/10/2024 at 12:51 PM with Registered Nurse, Staff A, she indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for Trauma Informed Care, Resident ID #s 12 and 21. Findings are as follows: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) State Operations Manual, Appendix PP Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last updated 2/3/2023 states in part, .'Trauma' results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being . 'Trauma-informed care' is an approach to delivering care that involves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of a resident's admission, that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident that meets professional standards of quality care relative to bilateral lower extremity edema (swelling caused due to excess fluid accumulation in the body tissues) for 1 of 2 new admissions, Resident ID #179. Finding are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). During a surveyor observation on 11/14/2023 at 9:25 AM, the resident was observed to have bilateral lower extremity edema. Review of the resident admission document tilted admission Observation dated 11/10/2023 states in part .left foot 2+ pitting edema (indentation that remains in the edematous area after pressure is applied) .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, surveyor observation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for COVID-19, Resident ID #28, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for new admissions, Resident ID #179. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled Care of the COVID-19 Positive Resident/Patient last updated [DATE] states in part, .The residents care plan will be revised to reflect the infection status and care of the individual resident's needs . Closed record review revealed that Resident ID #28 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease) and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of a progress note dated [DATE] states, Resident at baseline, coughing more than usual. Positive covid at this shift.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the irregularities identified by the Clinical Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were acted upon for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #24. Findings are as follows: Record review for the resident revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, fusion of spine (neurosurgical or orthopedic surgical technique that joins 2 or more vertebrae), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the document titled [Pharmacy] Consultation Report revealed that on August 28, 2023, the following laboratory tests were recommended to be obtained for the resident: - Monitor A1C (glycohemoglobin - a test used to monitor how well a person's blood sugar level is being managed). - Monitor fasting lipid panel (a blood test that measures the amount of certain fat molecules called lipids in the blood). - Monitor serum creatinine (a blood test that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 25 opportunities observed during the medication administration task, there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 8%. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 has a physician's order dated 8/17/2018 for Lactulose (a medication used to treat constipation) Oral Solution 10 GM (gram)/15 ML (milliliter), administer 30 ml by mouth twice a day, every morning and evening. During a surveyor observation of the medication administration task with Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff C, on 11/15/2023 at 9:15 AM, revealed she administered 22 ml of Lactulose instead of 30 ml as ordered by the physician. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation with Staff C, she acknowledged she did not administer the Lactulose as ordered. Staff C stated I can't see very good. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #5 has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for COVID-19, Resident ID #28. Findings are as follows: a. Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease) and type II diabetes mellitus. Record review revealed that the resident expired on [DATE]. Review of the banner on the electronic medical record revealed that the resident's advanced directives were full code (wants resuscitation and all life saving measures performed in a medical emergency). Review of the resident's closed medical record revealed a signed Advanced Directive for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and comfort measures (CMO). During a surveyor interview on [DATE] at 11:54 AM with Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, she revealed that the resident's signed advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to follow standard precautions (basic level of infection control that should be used at all times, example: hand hygiene) to prevent the spread of infection relative to hand washing during the Medication Administration task for Resident ID #s 3, 5, 18 and 180 and placement of a glucometer supply basket during the morning blood glucose monitoring for Resident ID #s 13, 24, 79 and 129. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled General and Medication Administration .Procedure states in part, .2. Prior to preparing or administering medications, authorized and competent Facility staff should follow facility's infection control policy (e.g., handwashing) . 1. During a surveyor observation on 11/15/2023 of the Medication Administration task with Certified Medication Technician, Staff C, she was observed administering medication to the following residents without performing hand hygiene between residents at the following times: - 8:22 AM - Resident ID #5 - 8:41 AM - Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct periodic accurate, comprehensive, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident IDs #2, 3, and 4. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #2 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in June of 2023. Further record review failed to reveal evidence that a quarterly assessment was completed in September. 2. Record review for Resident ID #3 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in September of 2023. Further record review failed to reveal evidence that an admission assessment was completed. 3. Record review for Resident ID #4 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in June of 2020. Further record review failed to reveal evidence that a quarterly assessment was completed in July of 2023. During a surveyor interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Coordinator on 10/18/2023 at 1:43 PM, she acknowledged that the above assessments were incomplete. During a surveyor interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-25 · tag F0638 — widespreadAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it is has been determined that the facility failed to assess residents using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) not less frequently than once every 3 months. According to the, State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised in February of 2023 states in part, .DEFINITIONS §483.20(c) 'Quarterly Review Assessment' is an OBRA ' 87-required, non-comprehensive assessment that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. As such, not all Minimum Data Set (MDS) items appear on the Quarterly assessment . 1. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed a Quarterly MDS assessment with a start date of 11/16/2023 and a required completion date of 11/30/2023. Further record review revealed, that as of 1/25/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARRIS, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/01/1994 |
| HARRIS, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/1994 |
| KLUFAS, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/1994 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415108. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.