Mansion Nursing and Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. Resident ID #1 was inadvertently administered multiple medications by the nurse assigned to Resident ID #1's roommate, Resident ID #2. The medications included, an insulin injection, two antipsychotics, an antidiabetic, a benzodiazepine, an anticonvulsant, two antidepressants, a laxative, and eye drops. Additionally, Resident ID #1 was previously administered his/her prescribed morning medications from the Medication Aide prior to mistakenly receiving his/her roommate's medications. As a result of the errors, Resident ID #1 became unresponsive and hypoglycemic (a condition that occurs when your blood sugar level drops below a healthy range) and required hospitalization. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/26/2026, indicated that Resident ID #1 was inadvertently administered medications intended for another resident and s/he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following provider orders for 40 of 48 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1 through 40.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility-reported incident dated 1/14/2026 and submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health revealed that during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift on 1/2/2026, Registered Nurse (Staff A) failed to fulfill assigned nursing responsibilities, including failure to complete the medication administration pass and failure to complete required treatments, monitoring, and documentation for the entire shift. Record review of the facility schedule revealed Staff A worked during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift on 1/2/2026.Record review failed to reveal medication orders were administered from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM on 1/2/2026 into 1/3/2026 for 40 of 48 residents reviewed.Record review failed to reveal treatment orders were completed on the 11:00 PM to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that before a resident is transferred to a hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave that the facility provides written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies information about the bed hold policy, for Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy, states in part, Whenever a resident is transferred from the facility for the purposes of hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the resident and/or representative is informed of the facility's policy concerning holding the bed. Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/11/2025, alleges in part, the resident was not given the right medication/dosages, was not offered a bed-hold when sent out to the hospital for a behavioral health evaluation. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for one of three residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/11/2025, alleges in part, that the resident did not receive his/her methadone (a medication prescribed to treat opioid addiction). Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, fracture of left femur with surgical repair, sepsis secondary to cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain, typically affecting the lower legs) of the left lower extremity, and receives daily Methadone. Record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of November 2025, revealed a physician's order dated 11/25/2025 for Methadone Schedule II tablet, 40 milligrams (mg) once daily in the morning and 60 mg in once daily in the evening. Further review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to measure success and track performance of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) actions to ensure that problem areas are identified, and good faith efforts for improvements are achieved and sustained demonstrated by measurable objectives with statistical data documented.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled, .Quality Assurance Performance Improvement QAPI PLAN 2025 . revealed in part, .Establish, maintain, support, and document evidence of an ongoing QAPI program that includes effective mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating resident care and for appropriate response to findings .Record review of the facility's 2024 and 2025 QAPI failed to reveal evidence of any actions, measurements, or tracking to ensure efforts for improvements of identified problem areas within the facility. During a surveyor interview on 7/18/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM with the Administrator, she was unable to provide evidence that the facility developed actions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the irregularities identified by the Clinical Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were acted upon for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 5, 7, 14, and 25. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports dated November 2021 states in part, .Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. Prescriber accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing .The Director of Nursing or designated licensed nurse address and document recommendations that do not require a physician intervention.1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #5 was admitted to the facility in November of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Record review of the pharmacist's progress note, dated 6/25/2025, states the following, JUNE…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for a resident who is diagnosed with a mental disorder and has a history of trauma, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #28. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was originally admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of a Mood Interview dated 7/3/2025 revealed a score of 12 out of 27, indicating the resident has moderate depression.Record review of a psychiatric consultation document dated 7/10/2025 revealed the resident reported that s/he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a medication with blood pressure parameters, Resident ID #3.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure and orthostatic hypotension (a decrease in blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or more systolic or 10 mm Hg or more diastolic within three minutes of standing from the supine position). Review of a physician's order dated 3/28/2025 revealed to administer midodrine (a medication prescribed to treat low blood pressure) 10 milligrams three times daily. Additionally, the special instructions indicate to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure (the top number of the blood pressure reading) of more than 130.Review of the June and July 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed that the resident received the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, store, and distribute food according to professional standards of food service safety, relative to 1 of 1 ice machine and 1 of 1 kitchenette observed. Findings are as follows: 1. During a surveyor observation on 7/1/2024 at 8:40 AM of the ice machine, revealed an accumulation of a pink substance located on the bottommost edge of the ice dispenser shield. Additionally, the pink substance was easily removed by wiping it with a paper towel. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation with Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff D, she acknowledged the presence of the above-mentioned pink substance within the ice machine. 2. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 3-501.17 states in part, .(B) .refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food .shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment .and: (1) the day the original container is opened in the food establishment shall be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections related to the implementation of water system management control measures to mitigate the development of Legionella (a very serious type of lung infection caused by the bacteria called Legionella which can be found in water) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens for 1 of 1 ice scoop and designated container. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 20 and 26. Findings as follows: 1) Record review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention document titled, Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage room observed, 1 of 1 medication refrigerator, and 2 of 3 medication carts observed ([NAME] One and Two). Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled LTC Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual with a revision date of [DATE] states in part, Once any medication or biological package is opened, facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications. Facility staff should record date opened on the primary medication container when the medication has a shorter expiration date once opened .If a multi-dose vial of an injectable medication has been opened or accessed, the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different date for the opened vial . 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,205 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $22,205 — penalty dated 2026-06-01
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-20 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI