Coventry Operations RI LLC DBA Respiratory and Reh
10 Woodland Drive, Coventry, RI 02816 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 210 certified beds · (401) 826-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 12 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $370,011 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-14)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.9% | 19.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 17.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.0% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.8% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.2% | 22.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.2% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.1% | 78.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.4% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.0% | 14.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.59 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.68 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 45.0–67.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.6–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.5–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 105.2 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 105 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
81 citations, most serious first. The 28 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident who requires mechanical ventilation (a life-support therapy that assists or replaces natural breathing by delivering oxygen and removing carbon dioxide through a ventilator) who experienced chest pain and was sent via rescue to an acute care hospital for evaluation, Resident ID #1, who ultimately expired in transit to the hospital. Further, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory staff provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 6 respiratory staff reviewed, Staff A, C, D, and E to ensure that a physician's order for mechanical ventilation settings were in place for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-invasive ventilation (NIV, a machine that provides breathing support using an external mask or other component, eliminating the need for an invasive surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-04-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to prepare and serve fluids in a form designed to meet residents prescribed dietary needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nectar thick liquids (mildly thick fluid consistency required to promote safe swallowing) were prepared according to physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was prescribed nectar thick liquids, Resident ID #21. Additionally, the current styrofoam cup supply, located on 4 of 4 units, was found to consist of 16 fluid (fl.) ounce (oz.) cups instead of the 12 fl. oz cups that were posted in the facility for staff to use for guidance and instructions when preparing thickened liquids. This failure reflects a breakdown in the facility's system for implementing and monitoring prescribed diet modifications and placed residents at risk for choking, aspiration, and other serious complications related to swallowing impairments. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed that Resident ID #21 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-28 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) consistent with basic life support protocols to a resident who was found without a pulse or respirations, Resident ID #3. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the blood) and a tracheostomy (a surgical procedure to create an opening through the neck into the windpipe to facilitate breathing).Record review revealed that Resident ID #3 was a full code indicating that s/he wishes to receive life saving measures including CPR, which consists of chest compressions and rescue breaths, if required, in the event of a medical emergency.Review of a progress note dated [DATE] at 7:10 AM, authored by Respiratory Therapist (RT), Staff D, revealed that at approximately 5:45 AM, Resident ID #3 was found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who received Metolazone (a diuretic medication prescribed to treat fluid retention by increasing urine production) not as intended, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] revealed that Resident ID #1 had experienced a fall on [DATE] and was transferred to an acute care hospital. The resident subsequently died.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension (a condition where the blood pressure in the arteries of the lung is high), and chronic kidney disease.Review of a care plan dated [DATE] revealed a focus area that s/he is at risk for dehydration related to medications including diuretics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and resident representative and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, as because the facility failed to monitor a resident for side effects after s/he was administered significant antipsychotic medications in error, nursing failed to inform additional staff on the unit that an error had occurred in order to enable all staff to assist in the monitoring of the resident, the failure to notify a provider of the medication error timely, the failure to inform the resident's family of the error at all, and allowed a resident who required monitoring to leave the facility on a leave of absence (LOA), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who required emergency medical transport, hospitalization, and ventilation (ventilators are lifesaving machines that can support breathing function in the body when diagnosed with critical health conditions), Resident ID #1. Findings are as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and resident representative and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was administered psychiatric medications that were prescribed for another resident, who required emergency medical transport, hospitalization, and ventilation. Medical ventilators are lifesaving machines that can support breathing function in the body when diagnosed with critical health conditions. These intervention were necessary as a result of medication errors involving Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 6/19/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 went home on a leave of absence (LOA) on 6/15/2025 and the facility was notified that the resident was sent emergently to an acute care hospital by the family. Furthermore, the report indicates that it was discovered that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident receives adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 3 of 6 residents reviewed who were identified as an elopement risk, Resident ID #s 1, 2, and 4. Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/14/2024 alleged that Resident ID #1 eloped from the facility over the weekend and was found at a local convenience store. Review of a facility policy titled, SLA111 Elopement of Resident last revised in May of 2024, states in part, .definitions elopement occurs when a resident who is cognitively, physically, mentally, emotionally .impaired and is no longer making decisions on their own behalf wanders away, walks away, runs away, escapes, or otherwise leaves the community or environment unsupervised, unnoticed sign in/out records will be maintained and utilized whenever a resident leaves the community grounds alone .Elopement drills will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 15 of 15 residents reviewed with a tracheostomy (a medical procedure that involves creating an opening in the neck to place a tube into a person's trachea, or windpipe), relative to oral care with suctioning, Resident ID #s 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/23/2024 revealed in part that a resident alleged that on 5/22/2024 the second shift nurse shoved mouthwash two times in his/her mouth with no suction. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the facility has a policy or procedure on how to perform oral care on residents with a tracheostomy. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing to ensure resident safety and attain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident relative to 1 of 1 unlicensed person who was scheduled as a nurse on a unit unsupervised and who documented that she administered treatments and/or medications to 5 of 5 residents reviewed who had treatments and/or medications scheduled for the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and who documented in 34 of 34 residents' health records reviewed from a unit, Resident ID #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34. Additionally, the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing relative to 1 of 1 Registered Nurses (RN), Staff C, reviewed who worked 20 hours in a 24 hour period. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/7/2024, alleged that an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident relative to 1 of 1 unlicensed person who was working as a Graduate Nurse, (GN), in the facility and was responsible for overseeing the care of 34 of the facility's residents during the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift on 5/4/2024- 5/5/2024, Staff A. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/7/2024 alleged that an unlicensed graduate nurse administered medications to residents on the N3 (north) unit of the facility on the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift. Record review of Staff A's personnel file failed to reveal evidence that she had a valid nursing license. Additional review failed to reveal evidence that the facility provided nursing education or completed nursing competencies for Staff A Record review revealed Staff A worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-01 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to reconcile all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications, for 1 of 9 discharged residents reviewed, Resident ID #1, and failed to have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the residents status at discharge and a reconciliation of the residents medications for 2 of 9 residents reviewed Resident ID #s 6 and 9. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility's discharge policy titled Discharge Planning Process states in part, All Patients being discharged to home, to an assisted living facility, or another community based setting will be given a Discharge Transition Plan and Discharge Packet. The Discharge Transition Plan must include, but not limited to .A recapitulation of the patient's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment of therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results .A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who was administered seizure medications (Keppra, Vimpat, and Phenobarbital) and a blood thinning medication (Lovenox injection) intended for another resident, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy last revised on 1/1/2022 titled, .General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, states in part, .Facility staff should comply with Facility policy .and the State Operations Manual when administering medications .Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident .During medication administration, Facility staff should Identify the resident per Facility policy . Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2023 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident relative to the medication verification process for the readmission of Resident ID #1 that involved six staff members, Staff A, B, C, E, the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS), and the resident's physician, that resulted in a significant medication error for Resident # 1. Additionally, the facility failed to have nursing staff with the appropriate skills set regarding the care and treatment of Resident ID #1 after s/he was found unresponsive on the floor. Further, the facility failed to have nursing staff with the appropriate skills set to provide effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) consistent with basic life support protocols for a resident who was found without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards relative to falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #5. The facility failed to implement the resident's care plan, leading directly to an accident and injury to resident #5, who sustained a left distal tibia (large shinbone) and fibula (smaller shinbone) fracture.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/24/2025 alleges that Resident ID #5 sustained 2 falls and did not get the appropriate care related to his/her injuries.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (weakness and paralysis of one side of the body following a stroke), dependence on ventilator, use of tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care relative to insufficient staffing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a fall, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/24/2025 alleged that Resident ID #5 who is a .quadriplegic [paralysis of both arms and legs], dependent on a ventilator and feeding tube, and fully reliant on staff for all aspects of [his/her] care. the complaint alleged that on 9/29/2025, Resident ID #1 was found on the floor with a broken nose. Furthermore, the complaint alleged that the facility is .severely understaffed.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and inform the resident's representative when there was a need to commence a new form of treatment to deal with a problem for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was administered medications in error, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 6/19/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 went home on a leave of absence (LOA) on 6/15/2025 and the facility was notified that the resident was sent emergently to an acute care hospital by the family. Furthermore, the report indicates that it was discovered that the resident had received 200 mg [milligrams] of Clozapine [Clozaril- a medication prescribed to treat major psychiatric diagnoses like schizophrenia] in error. Additional review of this facility reported incident revealed a note from the RIDOH triage nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to promptly identifying and intervening during an acute change in a resident's condition, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/21/2024 alleges, Resident ID #1 had a new wound to his/her toe. Further review revealed the Physician's Assistant (PA) wanted to hospitalize the resident however, the facility administration refused to send the resident to the hospital. Review of a facility policy titled, Skin integrity and wound management review date 5/1/2024 states in part, .A comprehensive initial and ongoing nursing assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence skin health, skin/wound impairment, and the ability of wound to heal will be performed. The plan of care for the patient will be reflective of assessment finding from the comprehensive patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents that are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who receives nutrition and medications via Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube- is a feeding tube that provides supplemental feeding, hydration, or medicine directly to the stomach), Resident ID #21. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy, revised on 6/1/2021, titled, Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube)/Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube Placement, states in part, .Document .Procedure .Site assessment .Patient's response, including any adverse effects .X-ray confirmation . Record review for the resident revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to severe protein-calorie malnutrition resulting in gastrostomy tube placement. Record review reveals this resident is NPO (nothing by mouth). During the initial tour on 4/2/2024 at approximately 8:45 AM the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, pertaining to Resident ID #2 when Resident ID #1 physically assaulted the resident by pushing him/her against a door and holding a butter knife to his/her neck.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/1/2026 revealed that Resident ID #1 pushed Resident ID #2 against a door and placed a butter knife against his/her neck. Both residents were immediately separated by staff. There were no injuries to either resident. Resident ID #1 refused to hand the butter knife to staff but did hand it to the police officer shortly thereafter. Resident ID #1 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation.Record review revealed the alleged perpetrator, Resident ID #1, was admitted to the facility in September of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-invasive ventilation (NIV, a machine that provides breathing support using an external mask or other component, eliminating the need for an invasive surgical airway or breathing tube), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/19/2026 alleges, in part, that Resident ID #1 had been receiving the incorrect ventilator settings.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, duchenne or [NAME] muscular dystrophy (a severe, progressive genetic disorder characterized by the wasting away of skeletal, heart, and respiratory muscles), dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, and chronic respiratory failure.Review of the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to the resident to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility by communicating the appropriate information for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a discharge to his/her home, Resident ID #4.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/14/2026 revealed that the resident was discharged with a plan of care that was incomplete.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2026, with diagnoses including but not limited to, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disorder, history of venous thrombosis and anxiety disorder. The resident was discharged with home care services on 4/6/2026.Record review of a progress note authored by Physician's Assistant (PA), Staff A, on the day of the resident's discharge revealed that the resident should follow up with his/her primary physician, a neurologist, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living, the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents who were reviewed for showers, Resident ID #4.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/14/2026 alleged that the resident was found with noticeably greasy hair, and the nurse was unable to determine when the resident had last received a shower. It further alleged that it wasn't until after the resident's family voiced a complaint that the resident received a shower.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2026, with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking and unsteadiness on his/her feet.Record review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed s/he requires partial/moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-14 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (NA) at least once every 12 months, for 5 of 5 NAs' personnel records reviewed, Staff I, J, K, L and M.Findings are as follows:Record review of the following personnel files failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed for the following NAs:-Staff I, with a hire date of 3/15/2000-Staff J, with a hire date of 11/11/2013-Staff K, with a hire date of 1/21/2025-Staff L, with a hire date of 3/29/2001-Staff M, with a hire date of 7/11/2024During a surveyor interview on 4/10/2026 at 11:15 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, she was unable to provide evidence of performance evaluations for the above-mentioned employees that were completed within the last 12 months.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that irregularities identified by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were acted upon for 4 of 4 residents reviewed with outstanding pharmacy recommendations from prior months, Resident ID #s 6, 29, 84, and 107. Findings are as follows:According to the facility policy dated 1/2024 and titled, Medication Monitoring Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, which states in part, .8. The nursing care center follows up on the recommendations to verify that appropriate action has been taken. Recommendations should be acted upon within 30 calendar days.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #6 was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition when the left ventricle, thickens, stiffens and does not fully relax between beats), schizophrenia (a chronic severe brain disorder causing psychosis), neuropathy (damage to the nerves causing weakness, numbness, and pain usually in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving Midodrine (a medication prescribed to treat low blood pressure), Resident ID #13.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration last revised in January of 2023, states in part, .General Guidelines.Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in February of 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypotension (low blood pressure).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 2/17/2026 for Midodrine 2.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day for hypotension, with parameters to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP; refers to the top number of a blood pressure reading and indicates the pressure in your arteries when your heart contracts) is greater than 110.Record review of the March and April 2026 Medication Administration Records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed and 3 of 4 medication carts observed. Findings are as follows:Record review of the facility policy dated [DATE], titled Medication Storage states in part, Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity.the provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet state and federal labeling requirements.Medications requiring 'refrigeration' .are kept in the refrigerator.Note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first opened. Outdated.discontinued medications .are immediately removed from stock.During a surveyor observation on [DATE] at 11:59 AM of the Third-Floor medication storage room, in the presence of Registered Nurse (RN), Staff P, revealed two packets of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to 3 of 4 kitchenettes.Findings are as follows:1. Review of the 2022 Food Code published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Section 4-601.11 (C), states in part, .non-contact surfaces of equipment shall be free of an accumulation of .other debris .During a surveyor observation on 4/9/2026 at 11:15 AM, of the One North Unit kitchenette, the microwave was noted to have an accumulation of red/orange dried matter on the ceiling, inside the microwave.During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation with Dietary Aide, Staff U, she acknowledged that the microwave was dirty and needed to be cleaned.During a surveyor observation on 4/9/2026 at 11:26 AM, of the One South Unit kitchenette, the microwave was noted to have dried splatters and stains of various colors, located on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident records are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for 15-minute checks, Resident ID #9; for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hand splints, Resident ID #52; and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order to flush his/her Gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a medical device inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide long-term nutritional support, fluids, and medication) before and after each feeding, Resident ID #71.Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed Resident ID #9 was readmitted to the facility in January of 2026 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance.Record review revealed a progress note dated 4/4/2026 which revealed the resident was involved in a physical altercation with another resident, where Resident ID #9 hit him/her on the arm. Further review revealed Resident ID #9 was going to be placed on 15-minute checks over the weekend.Record review revealed a physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infection, relative to maintaining Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) for 1 of 1 resident observed on EBP, Resident ID #20. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain contact/droplet precautions (an infection control measure that is used when a resident is known or expected to be infected to prevent the spread of germs that can be transmitted through respiratory droplets expelled when a person coughs, sneezes, or speak) for 3 of 3 residents observed on contact/droplet precautions, Resident ID #s 41, 87, and 107.Findings are as follows:Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention document titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-14 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for annual training for existing employees consistent with their expected roles, relative to education per the facility assessment, for 10 of 11 employees reviewed, Staff I, J, K, L, M, T, Y, GG, HH, and II.Findings are as follows:Record review of the Facility Assessment, dated March 2026, states in part, .We utilize Health Stream services for increased/mandatory education on annual and quarterly bases.Staff competencies required.A full ledger of staff-specific courses/competencies can be found in Health Stream.Record review of the facility's Health Stream Annual Education Plan revealed the following required trainings:-Resident rights and abuse prevention-HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) and confidentiality-Corporate compliance and ethics-Safe resident handling and transfers-Fall prevention-Emergency preparedness-Skin integrity and pressure injury prevention-Pain assessment and management-Dementia and behaviors-Mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's formulated advance directive would be followed, as there were inconsistencies between the paper medical record and the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who had recently changed his/her code status, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (the final stage of kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys have failed).Record review of the EMR advance directive banner, indicates a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Comfort Measures Only (CMO). Further review revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] indicating a code status of DNR/CMO. Record review of the most recent Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with actual pressure ulcers (localized injuries to the skin and/or underlying skin usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #52.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anoxic brain damage (caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain) and persistent vegetative state. Record review of a nursing progress note dated 4/8/2026 at 5:53 PM, revealed that resident has a new Stage 1 pressure injury to the dorsum (area of the foot on the top surface extending from the ankle to the toes) of his/her right foot.Review of a care plan last revised on 3/5/2026 revealed the resident is at risk for skin breakdown with interventions including, but not limited to, off loading and floating heels with pillows while in bed.Record review of a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion (ROM) receives appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM and/or to prevent further decrease in ROM for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with contractures (the shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that cause the joints to become very stiff, which prevents normal movement), Resident ID #52.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #52 was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anoxic brain damage (caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain) and persistent vegetative state. Record review of a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was in a persistent vegetative state with no discernible consciousness. Further review revealed the resident had impaired range of motion to both of his/her upper extremities. Additional review revealed that the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality related to following physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed regarding flushes for through a gastrostomy tube (a flexible tube that allows for the delivery of liquid nutrition and medications directly into the stomach), Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/14/2025 alleges in part, that staff was not consistent with following physician orders related to the resident's tube feeding and flushes. The complaint further revealed that the issues began approximately 4 weeks prior to the complaint being filed.According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in July of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The facility must also review and update this assessment whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/24/2025 alleges that Resident ID #5 sustained 2 falls and did not get the appropriate care related to his/her injuries. Additionally, the complaint alleges that the facility does not have enough staff or qualified staff.Review of a document titled, Facility Assessment dated March 2025-2026 states in part, .Acuity-Sufficiency Analysis Summary.4. Please document total #[number]/average/range of staff required to ensure sufficient number of qualified staff are available to meet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a physician referral for an appointment, Resident ID #5.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (weakness and paralysis of one side of the body following a stroke), dependence on ventilator, use of tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the windpipe to assist with breathing) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening into the stomach for purposes of feeding).Review of a progress noted dated 8/3/2025 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's physician completed a medication reconciliation upon readmission. This failure resulted resulted in a resident receiving the medication Metolazone (a medication prescribed to treat fluid retention) in error, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] revealed that Resident ID #1 had experienced a fall on [DATE] and was transferred to an acute care hospital. Additionally, the resident subsequently died.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension (a condition where the blood pressure in the arteries of the lung is high), and chronic kidney disease.Review of the progress notes revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital and was admitted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's records are complete and accurately documented, relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed who received Metolazone (medication to treat fluid retention) inaccurately, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/14/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 had experienced a fall and was transferred to an acute care hospital to be treated. However, the facility was later informed that the resident had passed away.Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses, including but not limited to, heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle cannot pump blood effectively), pulmonary hypertension (a condition where the blood pressure in the arteries of the lung is high) and chronic kidney disease.Record review of a hospital document titled Continuity of Care Adult Discharge dated 10/9/2025 revealed that the resident was discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence) receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/14/2025 alleged neglect and that a resident had developed two additional bed sores while residing in the facility. 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Skin Integrity and Wound Management dated 10/15/2024, states in part, .The licensed nurse will .Complete wound evaluation upon admission/readmission .weekly .Implement special wound care treatment as ordered . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis (a life-threatening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was given a written accounting of his/her deposits, withdrawals, and balances at least quarterly for 5 of 7 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 36, 41, 58, 69, and 252. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #36 was admitted to the facility in February of 2017. Review of a facility provided document titled, Trial Balance dated 3/18/2025, revealed that Resident ID #36 has funds being held by the facility. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a quarterly statement for Resident ID #36. 2. Record review revealed that Resident ID #41 was readmitted to the facility in December of 2023. Review of a facility provided document titled, Trial Balance dated 3/18/2025, revealed that Resident ID #41 has funds being held by the facility. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a quarterly statement for Resident ID #41. 3. Record review revealed that Resident ID #58 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024. Review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly provide notice to residents and/or representatives informing them of when changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or the state medical plan related to the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) of Non-coverage Form for 2 of 4 residents discharged from Medicare Part A Services that remained in the facility, Resident ID #s 64 and 402. Additionally, the facility failed to provide notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), in a timely manner for 2 of 4 residents reviewed who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining, Resident ID #s 93 and 253. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form, CMS 100-55, titled Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage, states in part: Medicare requires SNFs [Skilled Nursing Facilities] to issue the SNFABN to Original Medicare, also called fee-for-service (FFS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, Resident ID #66. Findings are as follows: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual last revised in October of 2024 states in part, Code diseases that have a documented diagnosis in the last 60 days and have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional status, cognitive status, mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death during the 7-day look-back period . Record review revealed Resident ID #66 was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder. Record review revealed a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated in January of 2024, with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Further review of the document revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to failure to follow a physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for daily weights, Resident ID #23. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (when the kidneys are damaged over time due to high blood sugar). Record review revealed an active physician's order with a start date of 7/31/2024, that states daily weights in the morning for monitoring. Record review failed to reveal evidence that daily weights were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the irregularities identified by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were acted upon for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for admission medication reconciliation, Resident ID #93. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung condition caused by damage to the lungs.) and bacterial pneumonia. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: -1/7/2025 prednisone (a medication prescribed to decrease inflammation) 40 milligrams (mg), give one tablet once daily for COPD -1/7/2025 doxycycline (a medication prescribed to treat infection), 100 mg, give one tablet two times daily for pneumonia Record review of a new admission MRR form dated 1/8/2025, authored by the pharmacist, revealed a recommendation to the facility to clarify a stop date for the doxycycline. Additionally,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities), for 4 of 4 residents reviewed on EBP, Resident ID #s 15, 60, 74, and 92. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility signage titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions states in part, .Wear Gown and Gloves prior to these activities .Dressing .bathing .transferring .providing hygiene .Device care or use of a device (i.e. central lines (a long, flexible tube that inserted into a vein in the neck, chest, arm or groin, and passed through until it reaches a large vein near the heart), urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomies (an opening a surgeon makes through your neck and into your trachea…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for antibiotic orders, Resident ID #s 89 and 93. Findings are as follows: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes states in part, Standardize the practices which should be applied during the care of any resident suspected of an infection or started on an antibiotic. These practices include improving the evaluation and communication of clinical signs and symptoms when a resident is first suspected of having an infection, optimizing the use of diagnostic testing, and implementing an antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to inform the resident's appointed representative, in advance, of the care to be furnished by the physician or other provider, of the risks and benefits of proposed care or treatment alternatives relative to the ordering of, and administration of, an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for the use of Rexulti (an atypical antipsychotic medication), Resident ID #101. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/17/2025 alleges that the resident was started on Rexulti in January of 2025 and the resident was unable to provide consent. Additionally, a family member was never contacted about the addition of Rexulti nor advised of any risks or adverse reactions related to its use. Review of the facility policy titled, .Informed Consent last reviewed 2/1/2023 states in part, .Informed consent will be obtained from the patient or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), Resident ID #452. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition last reviewed on 2/23/2021 states, in part, .Neglect is defined as the failure of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress . Review of a facility policy titled, .Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) last revised 5/1/2023 states in part, .Activities of daily living (ADLs) include: Hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care; Mobility - transfer and ambulation, including walking; Elimination - toileting .A patient who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary level of ADL assistance to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and revise a care plan after each assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #21. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled Falls Management last revised on 3/15/2024 states in part, .Implement and document patient centered interventions according to individual risk factors in the patients care plan . Record review revealed Resident ID #21 was readmitted to the facility in April of 2024, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, difficulty walking, and unsteadiness on feet. Record review revealed the following: -1/5/2025 - The resident sustained an unwitnessed fall, s/he was found lying on his/her back on the floor in his/her room. Review of a care plan with a focused area for risk for injury related to falls, revealed an intervention initiated on 1/5/2025, for a bedside mat on floor to right side of the bed at all times while resident is in bed. -2/11/2025 - The resident sustained an unwitnessed fall while attempting to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication with the dialysis center, Resident ID #64. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Dialysis: Hemodialysis [HD] . states in part, .Shared Communication Between the Center and the Certified ESRD [End-stage renal disease] Facility .Communication topics .Declines in functional status, falls, the identification of symptoms such as anxiety, depression, confusion .Changes and/or decline in conditions unrelated to HD . Record review revealed that Resident ID #64 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2025, with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, ESRD. Record review revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for admission medication reconciliation, Resident ID #93. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung condition caused by damage to the lungs) and bacterial pneumonia. Record review of a Continuity of Care Discharge/Transfer of Patient Form (COC) dated 1/1/2025 revealed an attached communication form titled Discharge summary with the following physician's orders: -prednisone 40 milligrams (mg), give one tablet once daily for 4 days, which indicates the medication would be discontinued on 1/5/2025. -doxycycline 100 mg, give one tablet two times daily for 2 days which indicates the medication would be discontinued on 1/3/2025. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: -1/7/2025 prednisone 40 mg, give one tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to document all required components of the facility-wide assessment. Additionally, the facility failed to review and update the assessment whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment. Findings are as follows: Review of an undated and unsigned facility document titled, Facility Assessment, for the year of 2025, failed to reveal evidence of the active involvement of the following participants in the process: 1. Nursing home leadership and management, including but not limited to, a member of the governing body, the Medical Director, an Administrator, and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS). Record review of the Assessment Contributors section, revealed of the 13 management staff listed including the Administrator, the DNS, and the Medical Director, 11 of them were no longer employed at the facility. 2. The facility must also solicit and consider input received from residents, resident representatives,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Additionally, the facility failed to make a good faith attempt to correct the identified concern of antibiotic stewardship (the effort to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and used by patients) and personal protective equipment (PPE) related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). Findings are as follows: A. Record review of the document titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Projects (QAPI) Infection Control/Education Topic: HH [hand hygiene]/PPE, dated 11/12/2024 through 3/14/2025, revealed that, relative to infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment relative to window air conditioners and exposed pipes in the hallway ceiling for 4 of 4 occupied facility units. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/27/2024, alleges that the facility .has mold on the AC units [Air conditioner units] Water dropping from the ceiling, mold on the carpeting . During a surveyor observation on 8/21/2024 at 9:02 AM of the facility's window air conditioners and unit ceilings revealed the following: -1 North Unit, air conditioner in rooms 146, 147, 148, and 151 were observed with diffuse black matter on the air flaps and inside. Additionally, an air conditioner unit in the dining room across from 158 was observed with black matter on outside and inside of the air flaps. -2 South Unit, multiple air conditioner in rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, for existing staff, consistent with their expected roles, relative to education involving smoking per the facility assessment, for 5 of 5 staff reviewed, Staff A, D, E, F and G. Findings are as follows: According to the Facility Assessment, dated February 2024, which indicates the facility will provide care for resident who smoke. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the following staff completed smoking education: - Registered Nurse, Staff A, hired on 9/19/2023 - Registered Nurse, Staff D, hired on 7/5/2024 - Nursing Assistant, Staff E, hired on 9/18/2023 - Nursing Assistant, Staff F, hired on 2/3/2023 - Nursing Assistant, Staff G, hired on 3/14/2024 During a surveyor interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:02 PM, with the Director of Nursing Services, he was unable to provide evidence that training relative to smoking was completed for the above-mentioned staff.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide mandatory training to their staff, that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program, for 3 of 5 staff reviewed, Staff A, D, and E. Findings are as follows: Record review failed to reveal evidence that the following staff completed QAPI training or education: - Registered Nurse, Staff A, hired on 9/19/2023 - Registered Nurse, Staff D, hired on 7/5/2024 - Nursing Assistant, Staff E, hired on 9/18/2023 During a surveyor interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:02 PM, with the Director of Nursing Services, he was unable to provide evidence that the QAPI training was completed for the above-mentioned staff.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide all staff with behavioral health training, for 3 of 5 staff reviewed, Staff, A, D, and E. Findings are as follows: Record review failed to reveal evidence that the following staff completed the mandatory behavioral health training or education: - Registered Nurse, Staff A, hired on 9/19/2023 - Registered Nurse, Staff D, hired on 7/5/2024 - Nursing Assistant, Staff E, hired on 9/18/2023 During a surveyor interview on 8/16/2024 at 3:02 PM, with the Director of Nursing Services, he was unable to provide evidence that the behavioral health training was completed for the above-mentioned staff.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 7 of 9 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/17/2024 alleges multiple residents did not receive their medications, as ordered. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, and 4. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/17/2024 alleges multiple residents did not receive their medications, as ordered. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024 and readmitted in July of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Respiratory Disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and makes it difficult to breathe) acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition where there in not enough oxygen in the tissues in your body) with hypercapnia (when there is too much carbon dioxide in the blood). Record review of the July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following physician's orders: - 7/14/2024 Spiriva Respimat inhaler 2.5 Microgram (MCG) 2 puff once daily at 9:00 AM (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident ID #s 1 and 3. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/5/2024 revealed, that Resident ID #1's .Wound care treatment was outdated and not completed per MD [medical doctor] order. Resident was seen by wound care MD today . Record review of a facility policy titled, Skin Integrity and Wound Management states in part, .To Provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health, prevent pressure injuries, and promote healing .Perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressings for presence of complications or declines . 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans in accordance with the facility assessment for 3 of 3 nurses reviewed, Staff A, I, and J who worked on the Ventilator Unit. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/23/2024 revealed in part that a resident alleged that on 5/22/2024 the second shift nurse shoved mouthwash two times in his/her mouth with no suction. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the facility has a policy or procedure on how to perform oral care on residents with a tracheostomy (a medical procedure that involves creating an opening in the neck to place a tube into a person's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following a physician's order for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with an indwelling suprapubic catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and empties the urine into a drainage bag), Resident ID #'s 7 and 8. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/21/2024 alleges in part, that treatments were not completed as ordered on the day shift of 5/20/2024. 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #7 was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnosis including, but not limited to, obstructive uropathy (excess urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident ID #'s 4, 5 and 6. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to The Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/21/2024 alleges in part, treatments were not completed as ordered on the day shift 5/20/2024. 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #4 was readmitted to the facility in April 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, unstageable pressure ulcer (characterized by full-thickness skin and muscle loss, with slough (moist dead tissue) or eschar (dry dead tissue) obstructing the wound bed). Record review revealed the following physician's orders dated 5/16/2024: -pressure injury sacrum (pelvic area) cleanse with wound cleanser, skin prep (skin protection wipe)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/21/2024 alleges the Director of Nursing Services worked on 5/20/2024 from 7:00 AM through 11:00 PM and failed to administer insulin, as ordered. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes and morbid obesity. Review of a physician's order dated 5/20/2024 revealed Semglee insulin, inject 16 units once per day for diabetes. Review of the May 2024 Medication Administration Record failed to reveal evidence the Semglee insulin was administered as ordered on 5/20/2024. Review of a physician's order dated 5/8/2024 revealed Lispro insulin inject subcutaneously (below the skin) per sliding scale before meals for diabetes. Review of the May 2024 Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for neglect, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/26/2024 alleges in part that a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) does not administer Resident ID #5's medication when they are due. Record review of a 2/23/2021 facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition, states in part, .prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect .for all residents .Neglect is defined as the failure of .employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress . Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Guillain-Barre syndrome (a rare disorder in which your body's immune system attacks your nerves), gastroesophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder receives appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who exhibited behavioral symptoms, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/24/2024 alleges in part that Resident ID #4 exhibited uncontrollable combative behaviors. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and anxiety. Record review of a care plan dated 4/17/2024 revealed a focus area indicating s/he exhibits distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to anxiety and dementia. Interventions include but are not limited to; refer to behavioral health specialist as needed, observe for signs and symptoms of worsening anxiety, anger and agitation. Record review revealed a telehealth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to 3 of 5 kitchenettes, 1 of 2 resident room refrigerators, and the cleanliness of 3 of 4 kitchenette ice machines. Findings are as follows: 1. Surveyor observation of the North 3 unit kitchenette on 4/2/2024 at 10:22 AM, revealed 1 two ounce (oz) package of non-individually wrapped Fig [NAME] cookies stored in the refrigerator, opened and not dated. During a surveyor interview on 4/2/2024 at approximately 10:30 AM with Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff E she acknowledged the above observation. - Surveyor observation of the North 1 unit kitchenette on 4/2/2024 at approximately 10:38 AM, revealed a box of ice cream bars that were opened and not dated. Additional observation revealed a 1.5 quart sized container of Breyers chocolate ice cream with freezer burn and was approximately ¾ consumed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abnormal laboratory results, Resident ID #94. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypothyroidism (a condition which the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone), stroke and hypertensive heart disease. Further record review revealed the resident was admitted to hospice services (hospice care-focuses on the care, comfort, and quality of life of a person with a serious illness who is approaching the end of life) on 3/1/2024. Record review of a lab report dated 12/27/2023 revealed a TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone-test to see how well your thyroid is working) result of 0.23 IU (normal range 0.400-4.100 International Unit per Milliliter, indicating a low TSH level. Record review of a progress note dated 12/27/2023 and authored by the APRN (Advanced Practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staffing to ensure resident safety and attain the highest practicable, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care relative to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for ADL care needs, Resident ID #s 21 and 77. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #21 was readmitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dependence on respirator (a machine used to support or replace breathing) and stroke. Record review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident requires the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility including turning from side to side, to and from a lying position, and transferring from bed to chair. Review of a care plan dated 5/2/2023 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 10 residents reviewed relative to breaking the chain of custody of medications and administering said medications to a resident, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: According to U.S. Pharmacist article, published June 11, 2021 titled Uncovering the Impact of Storage on Generic Medications, states in part .Storage conditions are vitally important to the overall integrity and quality of medications, and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, the FDA (Federal Drug Administration), and drug manufacturers provide guidelines for proper storage .From the point of manufacture to the distribution of a medication to a patient, many factors can directly impact the integrity of a drug product, which may result in an avoidable decrease in treatment efficacy or even cause harm. One of the most easily overlooked factors that can directly impact the quality of a drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009 , states in part, .Proper techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance .Do not rest the bag on the floor . Review of a facility policy titled, Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Care Of , states in part, .13. Secure tubing to keep the drainage bag below the level of the patient's bladder and off the floor. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed that s/he was readmitted to the facility in January of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection, Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase [ESBL a type of infection in the urinary tract], congestive heart failure, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain specialized rehabilitation services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to rehabilitative services, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/08/2023 alleges in part, .On October 18, 2023, I contacted [Social Worker] and left a voicemail in regard to the August 14, 2023 referral for OT [Occupational therapy] and PT [Physical Therapy] from the office of the [physiatrist, a medical doctor who treats pain and mobility]. As of today's date, she has not returned my call and [the resident] has not been scheduled for OT or PT . Record review of Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction and stage IV pressure ulcer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin or underlying tissue due to pressure), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/8/2023 alleges in part, .On multiple occasions Resident ID #1 has had oozing bed sores and blisters on [his/her] body due to lack of repositioning of his/her body [Resident ID #1] currently has a 4x3 pressure ulcer on [his/her] left heel . Record review of Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for a change in condition and abnormal lab values, Resident ID #'s 1 and 4. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/08/2023 alleges in part, .On multiple occasions Resident ID #1 has had oozing bed sores and blisters on [his/her] body due to lack of repositioning of his/her body [Resident ID #1] currently has a 4x3 pressure ulcer on his/her left heel . Record review of Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, history of traumatic brain injury, cerebral infarction (stroke) hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction, and a stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) to the sacrum (area located at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #'s 3, 4, and 5. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/2/2023 alleges that Resident ID #3 used delivery services to order his/her own MiraLAX (medication used to treat constipation) because s/he had not had a bowel movement in 10 days. - Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but are not limited to, chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia and constipation. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor interview and record review, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the use of a low air loss mattress, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in August of 2019 with diagnoses including, but are not limited to, persistent vegetative state, chronic respiratory failure, brain damage, and constipation. Review of a physician's order dated 7/1/2022 revealed Low air loss mattress to bed every shift Settings 4 Bars Check settings and functions every shift. Review of the care plan initiated on 6/24/2022 and revised on 11/2/2022 indicates [Resident] is at risk for skin breakdown as evidenced by history of pressure ulcer, has actual skin breakdown .and chronic excoriation .[Resident] has contractures, decreased activity, frail fragile skin . with intervention which include but are not limited to low air loss mattress as ordered . During a surveyor observation on 11/6/2023 at 2:44 PM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for humidified air tubing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states: The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review of a physician's order dated 6/2/2023 reveals to change the humidified air tubing, date and initial every day shift every Friday. During a surveyor observation of the resident's room on 8/4/2023 at approximately 12:00 PM, revealed blue humidified air tubing, dated 6/30. During a surveyor interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on 8/4/2023 at approximately 2:50 PM, she acknowledged that the tubing was dated 6/30. Record review of the July Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed that the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-06-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The facility must review and update this assessment whenever there is, or the facility plans for, any change that would require a substantial modification to any part of this assessment and maintain a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/23/2026 alleges in part, that the facility has a severe and persistent staffing shortage.Review of a document titled, 2025 Facility Assessment revealed the document had been signed by the former administrator and former Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 3/30/2026. The document states in part, .Function- Sufficiency Analysis Summary.4. Please document total #[number]/average/range of staff required to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was given a written accounting of his/her deposits, withdrawals, and balances, at least quarterly for 6 of 6 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 14, 55, 57, 71, 74, and 86.Findings are as follows:Record of a facility document titled Resident Fund Management Service balance report as of 4/8/2026, revealed that the facility holds funds for Resident ID #s 14, 55, 57, 71, 74, and 86.Record review failed to reveal evidence quarterly statements were provided to Resident ID #s 14, 55, 57, 71, 74, and 86.During a surveyor interview on 4/8/2026 at 10:19 AM, with the Regional Business Office Assistant, she was unable to provide evidence of a written accounting of the above residents' deposits, withdrawals, and balances at least quarterly, per the regulation.During a surveyor interview on 4/10/2026 at 12:40 PM, with the Administrator, he was unable to provide evidence that the facility provided quarterly statements for the above-mentioned residents within the last four quarters, as required.
- No harm found · B2026-04-14 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify each resident, or resident representative, that receives Medicaid benefits when the amount in the resident's account reaches $200 less than the Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with over $4000 in personal needs funds handled by the facility, Resident ID #s 14 and 74. Findings are as follows:Record review of Title 210-Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Chapter 50-Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) under section 2.4 (G) of the Uniform Accountability Procedures for Title XIX Resident Personal Needs Funds in Community Nursing Facilities, ICF/DD Facilities, and Assisted Living Residences requires that the facility shall: .(10) The nursing facility must notify the resident in writing when his/her balance reaches $200.00 less than the resource eligibility guideline, that Medicaid eligibility is jeopardized if the account exceeds the guideline [4,000] .Review of a facility document titled, Trial Balance .Balances as of 4/8/2026 for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-04-14 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow the resident or resident representative to obtain a copy of the records or any portions thereof (including in an electronic form or format when such records are maintained electronically) upon request and 2 working days advance notice to the facility relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed whose resident representative requested his/her medical records, Resident ID #120.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/11/2026 alleges, in part, that the facility failed to provide Resident ID #120's medical records to a family member who asserted legal entitlement to access the records as the resident's heir-at-law.Record review revealed the resident resided in the facility from September of 2025 until s/he passed away in the facility in October of 2025.Record review revealed a document titled, Consent for the Release of Confidential Health Care Information dated 1/5/2026 which revealed the family member's formal request for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$370,011 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-04-14
- $59,065 — penalty dated 2026-04-14
- $88,427 — penalty dated 2025-10-28
- $47,990 — penalty dated 2024-08-22
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-04-08
- $120,182 — penalty dated 2024-04-08
- $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
- $9,318 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-07 for 39 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-13 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYFLOWER HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 05/23/2025 |
| SCHWARTZ, ZEV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| OHI ASSET (CT) LENDER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| ADEOYE, MORENIKE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| JUMA, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| TABE, JULIUS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| ULUBIYO, ISRAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2026 |
| VESPIA, DONALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| POWERBACK REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| RGW CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415078. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.