Cedar Crest Nursing Centre Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 233 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 67% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 148.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.99 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remains as free from accident hazards as possible, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained a burn from a radiator, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] revealed Resident ID #1 was found with half of his/her body out of the bed with his/her legs against the radiator. Further review revealed the resident sustained burns on his/her knees and legs. Review of the Brava Stelpro Electric Baseboard heating system owner's manual revealed in part, Important Instructions .This heater is hot when in use. To avoid burns, do not let bare skin touch hot surfaces . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, vision loss of the left eye, anxiety, and a history of falling.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a recommended neurosurgery (a doctor who specializes in diagnosing and treating conditions that affect the brain) follow-up following a hospitalization, Resident ID #1. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a physician's order for a foot cradle (a medical device designed to hold heavy sheets and blankets off legs and feet) for Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:1. Record review of a facility reported incident dated 5/4/2026, states in part, Resident ID #1 was noted to have questionable seizure activity for approximately 7 minutes, became unresponsive and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. S/he returned to the facility with multiple rib fractures.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023, with diagnoses including, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to 1 of 3 residents reviewed with a physician's order for lorazepam (a medication prescribed to treat anxiety), Resident ID #11, and for 1 of 1 wound dressings observed for a pressure ulcer, Resident ID #159. Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #11 was re-admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder. Record review of a care plan dated 9/2/2025 revealed the resident is receiving hospice services with an approach to administer medications as ordered for comfort. Further review of the care plan with an approach start…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who were receiving an antihypertensive (a medication prescribed to lower blood pressure) medication with parameters, Resident ID #93. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in July of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 4/30/2025 for Diltiazem HCL extended release (a medication prescribed to lower blood pressure) 180 milligram (mg) daily, hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (SBP, refers to the top number of a blood pressure reading that indicates the pressure in the arteries when the heart contracts) is less than 110.Record review of the August and September 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the Diltiazem was administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety, relative to the main kitchen and 1 of 1 unit kitchenettes reviewed. Findings are as follows: 1. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 2-402.11 states in part, .food employees shall wear hair restraints, beard restraints that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food . During a surveyor observation on 9/16/2024 from 8:50 AM through 9:30 AM and at 11:20 AM of the main kitchen revealed the following: -Dietary Cook, Staff K and Dietary Aide, Staff L, with facial hair and not wearing a hair/beard restraint. -Dietary Cook, Staff K preparing a meat mixture for stuffed peppers not wearing a hair/beard restraint -Dietary Aide, Staff M with facial hair and not wearing a beard/hair restraint -Dietary Staff, Staff N with facial hair and not wearing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema, Resident ID #95 and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for aspiration precautions, Resident ID #242. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, which states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines which states in part, If a dose of a regularly scheduled medication is .refused .An explanatory note is entered .If two consecutive doses of a vital medication are withheld or refused, the physician is notified . Record review revealed Resident ID #95…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the administration of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident, relative to a diuretic (a medication used to treat fluid retention) medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #95. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #95 was re-admitted to the facility in March of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a syndrome that results in fluid buildup in the lungs, abdomen, feet, and arms) and chronic kidney disease (mild to moderate damage to the kidneys with symptoms that may include fluid retention). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 6/20/2024 for furosemide (a diuretic medication) 40 milligram (mg) twice a day. Record review of the August 2024 Medication Administration Record revealed the above-mentioned medication was refused on the following dates and times: -8/1- PM dose -8/3- PM dose -8/4- PM dose -8/5- PM dose -8/6- PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles relative to 1 of 1 resident observed with medications at the bedside, Resident ID #57. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage dated January 2024 which states in part, .Procedures 3. In order to limit access to prescription medications, only licensed nurses, pharmacy staff, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (such as medication aides) are allowed access to medication .medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access . Record review revealed Resident ID #57 was admitted to the facility in March of 2023 with diagnoses including, but are not limited to, vascular dementia and recurrent depressive disorder. Record review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide and prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with a pureed diet, Resident ID #s 1 and 71. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the facility is utilizing the Becky [NAME], Diet and Nutrition Care Manual, Simplified Edition. Additional record review of the Diet and Nutrition Care Manual revealed .IDDSI [International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative, a national guideline for texture modified diets] Level 4: Pureed Diet .All foods are pureed .eliminating the chewing phase. Further review of the manual states in part, Protein Foods (i.e .eggs .) Pureed consistency foods only .Sample Daily Meal Plan .Level 4: Pureed Diet .Breakfast .1 serving Pureed Egg . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, severe vascular dementia and dysphagia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with EBP related to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL, an enzyme produced by some bacteria that can make them resistant to certain antibiotics) in the urine, Resident ID #19. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care, Resident ID #27. 1. Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention document titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) Last Reviewed: August 1, 2023, states in part, Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication cart reviewed. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/19/2024 revealed that Resident ID #1 was unable to receive his/her 10:00 PM dose of Lyrica (a controlled medication used to treat pain) 25 milligrams (mg) on July 18, 2024, because the facility was unable to locate the 16 pills that were documented as available in the narcotic book. Record review of a facility policy titled, Controlled Medication storage revealed in part, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record keeping in the nursing care center in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations .Only authorized licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel have access to controlled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-03-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $245K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI