Saint Elizabeth Home East Greenwich

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 337 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 171 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 147.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a newly admitted resident received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who successfully eloped from the facility, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 1/2/2025 states in part, Patient left facility without alerting staff. Patient was unable to re-enter the building and decided to walk. [NAME] by called 911 and patient was sent to ER [Emergency Room] for evaluation. Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the RIDOH on 1/2/2025 alleges that Resident ID #1 eloped from the facility and was found sitting on a main road and taken to the hospital at approximately 3:00 AM. It further revealed that the resident's family member was not notified by the facility that the resident was unable to be located during rounds until 7:14 AM. This was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive and consume food in the appropriate form for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a modified diet of pureed texture, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/20/2024 revealed that Resident ID #1 experienced a choking incident at 6:00 PM, the Heimlich maneuver (first aid method use when a person is choking) was initiated and the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was promptly contacted. Upon the arrival of the EMS team the resident was noted to be without a pulse or respirations (number of breaths per minute). The resident expired at 6:24 PM. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2019 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and aphasia (language disorder making speaking and the ability to be understood difficult)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (NA), at least once every 12 months, for 3 of 3 NA personnel records reviewed, Staff B, C, and D.Findings are as follows:Record review of the personnel file for Staff B revealed she was hired in January of 2000. Further review revealed her last annual performance review was completed on 4/8/2024.Record review of the personnel file for Staff C revealed she was hired in January of 2008. Further review revealed her last annual performance review was completed on 2/13/2024.Record review of the personnel file for Staff D revealed she was hired in February of 2023. Further review revealed her last annual performance review was completed on 3/11/2024.During a surveyor interview on 4/22/206 at 10:22 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, she acknowledged that the above-mentioned NA's have not had a yearly performance review since 2024.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a wanderguard (a wearable tag, often in a bracelet or anklet form, used to prevent individuals with cognitive impairments from eloping or wandering from a secured area), Resident ID #113. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Wanderguard System and Assessments; Checks, last revised 4/2/2026, states in part, .The bracelet will be checked each shift to assure placement; the nurse will sign this as checked in the treatment record. The functionality of the bracelet is also to be tested routinely (weekly) and documented in the medical record.Wanderguard bracelets do expire and must be checked and replaced accordingly.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed relative to a resident-to-resident incident, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/19/2025 revealed in part, Upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER]A at 7a, [Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff A] observed [Resident ID #2] on top of [Resident ID #1]. [Resident ID #2] was disrobed on [his/her] bottom half. [Resident ID #1] was fully clothed with brief intact and fastened.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified psychosis, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and primary insomnia.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/13/2025, revealed in part, that Resident ID #s 1 and 2 were sitting in the dining room, at opposite ends of a table, when Resident ID #2 walked over to Resident ID #1 and struck him/her in the face multiple times. Further review revealed both residents were immediately separated, Resident ID #1 was assessed for injury, with no injury noted, and Resident ID #2 was sent to the hospital for a geriatric psychiatric evaluation. Review of a policy titled, Abuse Prohibition last revised 1/17/2023 states in part, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents are treated with respect and dignity and that all residents are free from abuse .DEFINITIONS .Abuse: willful infliction of injury, unreasonable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen, 3 of 3 kitchenettes and 4 of 4 [NAME] House kitchens observed. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 edition, Section 3-602.11 Food Labels states, .Label information shall include: (1) The common name of the food . Review of the facility's policy, food brought to residents from the outside, states in part, .the food must be clearly labeled with the resident's name and room number, the date the food was brought to the resident, and also the use by date .Resident and family should be informed that if the food is not consumed within 72 hours, it will be discarded for food safety concern . Additionally the policy reveals that if the food is not eaten within 72 hours the resident or family will be notified and the foods will be discarded by the nursing staff. During the initial tour of the main…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following a physician's order for nutritional supplements, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 6 and 54, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for blood pressure monitoring who is prescribed furosemide, (a medication used to reduce fluid), Resident ID #54. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1a. Record review revealed Resident ID #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and diabetes. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: -7/6/2024 house supplement 4 ounces (oz.), three times per day for weight loss -7/26/2024 Pro-Stat AWC, (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility was not being administered in a manner that enabled it to utilize resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident related the elopement of Resident ID #1. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for F 689. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled Missing Resident Policy states in part, Purpose: To provide direction to staff when a resident is determined to be missing or has eloped. Notify the Person in charge and/or charge nurse. Determine the time that the resident was discovered missing and when and where he/she was last seen .Check with other staff. Contact family to ask them if the resident is with them. If unable to determine where the resident is, notify other staff in the building and promptly search the facility and premises .If missing resident is not found following and expedite search (approximately 30 minutes), call 9-1-1 and provide Name of the resident, Date/time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to protect and keep residents free from physical abuse relative to an incident that occurred between Resident ID #1 and #2, resulting in a skin tear for Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse prohibition states in part, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents are treated with respect and dignity and that all residents are free from abuse .Abuse: Willful infliction of injury .resulting in physical harm .Examples of abuse include but are not limited to the following: Physical - Hitting, punching, pinching, kicking . Record review of a facility reported incident of resident-to-resident abuse was submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/17/2024. The report indicates that Resident ID #2 was being assisted out of the chair to be moved when Resident ID #1 bent over and pinched Resident ID #2 on the leg causing a skin tear. Record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a skin tear, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and type II diabetes. Review of a progress note dated 9/11/2024 revealed, a resident reached under a table and pinched Resident ID #2 in the leg, resulting in a skin tear. Review of a physician's order dated 9/13/2024 revealed, clean Resident ID #2's shin skin tear with normal saline, pat dry, and apply xeroform (wound treatment) to wound bed and cover with a foam dressing, every 3 days. Review of the September 2024 Treatment Administration Record revealed, Resident ID #2's wound was treated from 9/13/2024 through 9/28/2024, a duration of 22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 3 of 3 kitchenettes, and 4 of 4 [NAME] House kitchens. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 edition, Section 3-602.11 Food Labels states, .(B) Label information shall include: (1) The common name of the food . Review of the facility's policy, food brought to residents from the outside, states in part, .the food must be clearly labeled with the resident's name and room number, the date the food was brought to the resident, and also the use by date .Resident and family should be informed that if the food is not consumed within 72 hours, it will be discarded for food safety concern . Additionally the policy reveals that if the food is not eaten within 72 hours, refrigerated or at room temperature, resident or family will be notified and the foods will be discarded by nursing staff. A. During the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$64,230 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $49,797 — penalty dated 2025-01-13
• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI