No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harris Health Center LLC

833 Broadway, East Providence, RI 02914 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 31 certified beds · (401) 434-7404 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$10,276 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,276 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
318 Waterman Ave · (401) 438-5950 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
583 Taunton Ave · (401) 434-2993 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
327 Warren Ave # 3845 · (401) 699-5812 · Call to confirm hours
Park
162 Blanding Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.8%19.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.1%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.2%17.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%16.8%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.2%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%22.3%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table54.2%22.8%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.03
RN hours/ resident / day
0.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.41
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
28.0%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 28.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of infections relative to disinfecting glucometers (a device used to monitor blood glucose) for 3 of 3 residents observed who require blood glucose monitoring, Resident ID #s 8, 9, and 14; and 2 of 2 residents reviewed relative to contact precautions, Resident ID #s 14 and 18; and the handling of soiled linen for 1 of 1 laundry room observed. Findings are as follows: 1. According to the facility's policy last revised March of 2015 titled, diabetes - care of equipment states in part, .5. If a glucometer is to be used for one resident and then reused for another, the device must be cleaned and disinfected between uses .Follow the glucometer manufacturer's recommendations for cleaning . Review of the glucometer manufacturer's QA/QC (Quality Assurance/Quality Control) Reference Manual titled, ASSURE PLATINUM BLOOD GLUCOSE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen, 1 of 1 ice machine, 1 of 3 freezers, and 1 of 1 kitchenette.Findings are as follows:1. Review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Food Code 2022 Edition, section 4.602.11 (E)(4)(b), states in part, .surfaces of UTENSILS and EQUIPMENT contacting FOOD.shall be cleaned.In EQUIPMENT such as ice bins and.ice makers.at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil or mold.During a surveyor observation on the initial tour of the main kitchen on 1/27/2026 at approximately 10:08 AM of the ice machine, revealed a white colored component within the ice machine with small flecks of a pink colored matter that was able to be removed by wiping it with a paper towel.During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation with the Cook, Staff C, she acknowledged the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform the resident or resident's appointed representative, in advance, of the care to be furnished by the physician or other provider, of the risks and benefits of proposed care or treatment alternatives relative to the ordering of, and administration of, psychotropic medications (a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident ID #s 1, 5, and 12.Findings are as follows:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Safety; Psychotropic Medications and New Medication Orders effective 4/28/2025 states in part, Any and all psychotropic medications require resident or representative consent. Consent must include their awareness of the medication(s) ordered, the side effects to include black box warnings when applicable, and the risk/benefit (R/B) associated with the medications ordered.If verbal consent is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate monitoring for effectiveness and side effects for the use of psychotropic medications (a medication prescribed that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #s 1, 5, 12, 13, and 18. Findings are as follows:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Safety; Psychotropic Medications and New Medication Orders effective 4/28/2025 states in part, .Every effort must be made to attempt nonpharmacological intervention before receiving an order for a psychotropic medication.New medications must be monitored for effectiveness, and ultimately to determine if the newly ordered medication should continue or be discontinued (wither [sic] due to ineffective or it is no longer needed). The IDT [interdisciplinary team] shall ensure there are systems in place to re-evaluate and monitored these newly ordered medications.Care plan interventions shall include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse, relative to a physical altercation between Resident ID #s 24 and 28. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse prohibition dated August of 2020 states in part, .It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents are treated with respect and dignity and that all residents are to be free from abuse.DEFINITIONS.Abuse: Willful infliction of injury.resulting in physical harm.Examples of abuse.Physical-Hitting.Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/9/2025 revealed that Resident ID #28 struck Resident ID #24 with his/her fist causing an abrasion to his/her forehead.Record review revealed that the victim, Resident ID #24, was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia.Review of a Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide notice of the bed-hold policy to a resident in writing when a resident is hospitalized and return to the facility is anticipated for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for a hospital transfer, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of an undated facility document titled RESIDENT BED HOLD NOTICE states in part, .BED HOLD POLICY Whenever a resident is transferred from this facility for the purposes of hospitalization.the resident and / or representative must be informed of the facility's policy concerning holding the bed.Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in November of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition of low oxygen in the blood). Record review of a Discharge Minimum Data Set Assessment revealed that the resident had an unplanned discharge from the facility and was transferred to an acute care hospital on 1/3/2026 and s/he was anticipated to return to the facility. Further record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for a fluid restriction, Resident ID #13. Findings are as follows:Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia (a condition where there is too much water and not enough salt in the blood, making the blood too watery).Record review revealed the following dietary physician's orders with a start date of 10/14/2025:- .THIN LIQUIDS NO FREE WATER 2/2 [secondary to] FLUID RESTRICTION AT THIS TIME.- .Diet.regular texture *FLUID RESTRICTION*With Meals.Further record review failed to reveal evidence that a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the fluid restriction. During a surveyor interview on 1/30/2026 at 1:45 PM with the Director of Nursing Services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's legally authorized representative (guardian) was invited to and allowed to participate in the care planning process for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a court-appointed guardian, Resident ID #12. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that the required comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after an incident of resident-to-resident abuse occurred for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 24 and 28. Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed Resident ID #12 was readmitted to the facility in December of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease.Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition.Further record review revealed that the resident's primary representative is his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order to obtain a urine specimen, Resident ID #5, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident ID #s 6 and 24, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for a fluid restriction, Resident ID #13, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a suprapubic catheter (SP tube, a flexible rubber tube inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine), Resident ID #11. Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed.Findings are as follows:Record review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration Safety Program (MASP) - Medication Cart states in part, .The cart is to be checked periodically for expired medications. If an expired medication is noted during medication administration, the medication should not be given and removed from the cart and replaced.Medication labels are not to be altered, modified or marked in any way other than for noting the date that the product was opened.Inhalers shall be labeled accordingly and stored per manufacturer's guidelines.During a surveyor observation on 1/28/2026 at 10:24 AM, of the first-floor Certified Medication Technician (CMT) medication cart, in the presence of CMT, Staff E, revealed the following:-Wixela inhalation device opened and out of the foil package, with the dose counter reading of 57.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for staff assistance with meals at all times, Resident ID #7.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in December of 2021 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, food in respiratory tract causing injury.Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident required partial/moderate assistance of one staff member for eating.Review of a physician's order dated 11/25/2025 revealed to assist the resident with meals at all times twice daily between 7:00 AM through 3:00 PM and 3:00 PM through 11:00 PM.Surveyor observations revealed the resident was eating independently in a common area without staff assistance on the following dates and times:-1/27/2026 at 12:50 PM-1/28/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that includes, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 11 and 22. Findings are as follows:According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes states in part, Perform antibiotic 'time outs.' .Nursing homes should have a process in place for a review of antibiotics by the clinical team two to three days after antibiotics are initiated to answer these key questions:Does this resident have a bacterial infection that will respond to antibiotics?If so, is the resident on the most appropriate antibiotic(s), dose, and route of administration?Can the spectrum of the antibiotic be narrowed or the duration of therapy shortened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff, and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 of 3 residents reviewed Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/14/2025 reveals that Resident ID #1 left the facility without following the leave of absence policy and procedure. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2023 with diagnoses including, not limited to, bipolar disorder and epilepsy (a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures).Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 out of 15 indicating the resident's cognition is intact. Additional review of the MDS revealed the resident ambulates independently.Record review revealed a progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for significant weight loss and/or gain, Resident ID #9. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Monitoring and Weight Loss/Gain Protocol states in part, .Procedure: Residents who are at risk for a nutritional decline are to be weighed weekly .How to weigh the resident .6. Weights that are + [plus] or minus 3 pounds from the last reading must be reported to the nurse who will then be required to supervise an immediate re-weigh to double check the accuracy of the reading. The nurse is to initial the supervised reading to verify accuracy .a significant weight loss/gain is defined as a difference of 3 pounds or more in one week (if resident on weekly weights); a loss/gain of 5% or greater within one month .WHEN A SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT LOSS IS NOTED, THE FOLLOWING INTERVENTIONS MUST OCCUR:1 Reweigh the residents who are reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for side rails, Resident ID #s 11, 21, and 25. Findings are as follows: Review of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities Last revised 8/8/2024, states in part, .Regardless of mattress width, length, and/or depth, the bed frame, bed rail and mattress should leave no gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body .Facilities must also conduct routine preventive maintenance of beds and bed rails to ensure they meet current safety standards and are not in need of repair . 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #11 was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteoarthritis, and joint disorders. During surveyor observations on the following dates and times the resident was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for falls for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who had actual falls, Resident ID #16. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in December of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder. Record review of a facility document titled, Fall Prevention Program last revised 12/2010, states in part, .Fall risk assessments are performed as a part of the admission assessment, as part of the quarterly review, and as an annual and/or significant change of condition process of care plan review .Whenever a resident has a history of falls and/or scores high on the fall risk assessment form, or actually has a fall their record is to be reviewed .and a careplan is to be developed which establishes preventative measures or interventions to be taken to lower or eliminate the risk .any and all immediate fall prevention interventions are to be added to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with physician orders for quarterly fall assessments, Resident ID #s 7 and 9, and 2 of 5 residents reviewed with psychiatric recommendations, Resident ID #s 9 and 21. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1a. Record review revealed Resident ID #9 was admitted to the facility in December of 2011 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance and major depressive disorder. Review of a physician's order dated 1/30/2024 revealed an order for fall assessments to be completed quarterly and documented in the resident's record. Record review failed to reveal evidence that fall assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 2 medication carts observed. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, .Storage and expiration dating of medication and biological's last revised on [DATE] states in part, .Facility should ensure that medications and biological's that .have an expired date on the label .have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines .are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier .Once any medication or biological package is opened, facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container .when the medication has a shortened expiration date once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment relative to smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health, on 2/27/2024 alleges that smoking has been observed outside of the door of the nursing facility. There have been observations of cigarette butts littered all over the property and a smoldering ashtray. Review of a policy and procedure titled Smoking Policy states in part, .residents that wish to smoke must be in a designated area and may be limited to specific times . During a surveyor observation on arrival at the facility on 2/28/2024 at approximately 8:05 AM revealed the following: -Approximately 100 cigarette butts littered on the ground at the North and East entrances - An ashtray tower leaning against the North exterior wall of the facility with folding chairs - An ashtray observed in the mulch at the South bulkhead entrance; 5 feet from building During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: 1. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 3-501.16 reads in part, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding .food shall be maintained .57 degrees C(135 degrees Fahrenheit) .at 5 degrees C (41 degrees Fahrenheit) . During a surveyor observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 11/9/2023 at approximately 11:45 AM, the baked chicken had a hot holding temperature of 130 degrees Fahrenheit. 2. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 4.601.11(A) reads in part, .(A) equipment food contact surfaces .shall be clean to sight and touch . During a surveyor observation on 11/7/2023 at approximately 9:15 AM the following observations were made of equipment not being clean to sight: - The spray holes of the juice dispensing gun had a red debris accumulation and the cup holder that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to measure success and track performance of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) actions to ensure that problem areas are identified, and good faith efforts for improvements are achieved and sustained demonstrated by measurable objectives with statistical data documented. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility QAPI/QAA 2023 schedule and committee attendance sheet identified that QAPI/QAA meetings were held on the following dates: - January 23, 2023 - April 17, 2023 - July 24, 2023 - October 23, 2023 During a surveyor interview on 11/10/2023 at approximately 12:30 PM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) in the presence of the Administrator, she revealed the following focus areas that are actively being followed by the QAPI committee: - Facility reported incidents - Falls - Wounds - Medication errors - Elopement - Safety - Psychotropic medications - Covid vaccinations - Influenza vaccinations - Psychiatric services - Social services Record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 6 of 10 months reviewed. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program states in part, .This facility recognizes the need to monitor antibiotics use in order to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. The antibiotic stewardship program is directed towards the correct use of antibiotics- the five D's -right diagnosis, the right medication, the right dose, the right duration, and the right deceleration . Review of the antibiotic stewardship monthly records during the Infection Control Task on 11/9/2023 failed to reveal evidence of complete documentation of tracking information for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-10 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings are as follows: During the Infection Control Task with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 11/9/2023 at 11:48 AM, she revealed that the facility does not have a certified infection preventionist (IP) on staff and indicated she was the designated individual who assumed the responsibilities of the IP, however she is not certified. She further revealed that the facility hired an infection preventionist, but they have not completed their certification or required education. During a surveyor interview on 11/10/2023 at approximately 11:18 AM with the DNS, she was unable provide evidence of an Infection Preventionist in the facility that has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to the completion of the survey.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a wound, Resident ID #14 and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for intentional weight loss, Resident ID #20. Findings are as follows: Review of The State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised on 2/3/2023, states in part, .care planning drives the type of care and services that a resident receives .the intent is that each resident will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his/her other preferences and goals and address the resident's medical needs .facilities are required to develop care plans that describe the resident's medical, nursing, and physical needs . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #14 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right foot. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents observed for assessments and documentation relative to wound care, Resident ID #25. Findings are as follows: According to Wound Care Education Institute, 2020, wound care documentation should be carried out weekly including type of wound, measurements, type of tissue, symptoms of infection, presence of drainage, wound edges, pain, and current treatment. Review of a facility policy titled Clean Dressing Technique dated 1/2018, states in part, .15. Observe the wound for size, color, drainage, appearance, and amount of drainage. This is the best time to measure the area, before any medication is applied . Record review revealed Resident ID #25 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of rectum, anus, and anal canal. Review of a physician's order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to address the nutritional needs of every resident, including but not limited to, a resident at risk or already experiencing impaired nutrition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a severe weight loss, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled, Weight Loss/Gain Protocol states in part: .Policy .to assess for underlying causes of weight loss or gain and to intervene accordingly .rule out medical reasons for weight loss .review for depression .review for change in behavior .review medications .report all findings to physicians, if weight loss/gain desirable, document in care plan . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2013 with diagnoses which includes, but is not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks air flow), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Review of the weight summary report revealed the following: - 5/8/2023 weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms observed and 2 of 2 medication carts observed. Findings are as follows: A. Record review of a facility policy titled, Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biological's, Syringes, and Needles last revised 1/1/2013, states in part, .Facility should ensure that medication and biological's: 4.1 Have an Expiration Date on the label; 4.2 Have not been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines .Once any medication or biological package is opened, Facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medication. Facility staff should record the date opened on the medication container when the medication has a shortened expiration date when opened . During a surveyor observation of the nurse medication and treatment cart on 11/9/2023 at approximately 9:51 AM, in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation that the resident either received the pneumococcal vaccination or did not receive the vaccination due to medical contraindications or refusal, for 8 of 8 residents reviewed, Residents ID #s 1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 19 and 20. Findings are follows: According to the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, Revised 2/3/2023 states in part, .The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: .That the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal . According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical conditions or 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23 [23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for laboratory testing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #8. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states: The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in February of 2022 with diagnoses which include, but are not limited to, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Record review revealed a physician order dated 9/6/2023 entered by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), to obtain the following labs: - Complete blood count (CBC, a blood test used to look at overall health and find a wide range of conditions). - Hemoglobin A1C (a blood test that measures the average blood sugar level over the past two to three months).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive and consume food in the appropriate form for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for modified diet textures, Resident ID #s 1 and 7. Findings are as follows: A. Record review revealed a physician's order for Resident ID #1 which revealed s/he was to receive a pureed diet. Record review revealed a physician's order for Resident ID #7 which revealed s/he was to receive a NAS (No Added Salt) diet with pureed texture. Record review of the facility menu for Thursday, 11/9/2023, stated that the pureed diet textures were to receive pureed ham, mashed potatoes, and pureed carrots. During a surveyor observation on 11/9/2023 at approximately 11:20 AM, Resident ID #s 1 and 7 were served whole kernel corn which was not pureed. During a surveyor interview on 11/9/2023 at approximately 11:25 AM with a Dietary Cook, Staff C, regarding the diet textures for Resident ID #s 1 and 7, she revealed they were incorrect and should not have been served the whole kernel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident hazard for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident sent to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/16/2023 alleges in part, .resident of [facility name] left facility and did not return. This writer, NHA [Administrator], and [police department] have been notified of the incident . Review of a facility policy titled, Elopement Procedure, last revised on 9/1/2023, states in part, .It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and secure environment for all residents. In order to achieve this goal, residents are to be monitored at all times. Their presence within (or absence from) the facility is to be accounted for. The charge nurse is responsible to know the whereabouts of the residents on his/her unit . Review of the resident's record revealed s/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident hazard for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Leave of Absence Policy states in part, .Leaves of Absences will be approved by physician order .The Leave of Absence log is to be filled out in the presence of a staff member . Record review of a facility reported incident sent to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/1/2023 indicates that Resident ID #1 left the facility in his/her wheelchair, was approached by the local police 0.2 miles away from the facility, and was transported to the hospital for evaluation. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, paralytic syndrome following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left side, and transient alteration in awareness. Record review of the Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies which must be reviewed and updated as necessary, and at least annually.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed a document titled, Facility Assessment last updated 9/30/2025, which revealed the following participants were involved in the completion of the Facility Assessment:- Administrator- Director of Nursing Services- Social Worker- Medical Director- A residentFurther review of the Facility Assessment failed to reveal evidence that the facility solicited and considered input from a resident representatives and family members, as required per the regulation.During a surveyor interview on 1/30/2026 at 9:44 AM with the Administrator, he was unable to provide evidence that the Facility Assessment included input from a resident representative and or a family member and indicated that he was unaware it was a requirement.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,276 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $10,276 — penalty dated 2023-10-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-09 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HARRIS, CHARLESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/01/1994
HARRIS, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/1998
KLUFAS, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in RI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Rhode Island
$12,106/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,383/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,781/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next