Holiday Operator, LLC DBA Holiday Rehabilitation a

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 136.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed ensure that Resident ID #2's environment remained free of accident hazards, as possible, relative to the resident's assessed transfer needs and facility policy. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the Physical Therapist's recommendation for the use of a mechanical lift following the resident's identified decline in strength and mobility on 5/11/2026 and failed to ensure staff utilized a gait belt during manual transfers. As a result, Resident ID #2 was subjected to unsafe transfer practices including, being lifted under the arm and elbow area, which resulted in swelling, extensive bruising, and increased pain to the resident's left upper extremity. Requiring medical evaluation, diagnostic testing, pain medication, and ongoing monitoring. These failures resulted in actual harm for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an injury of unknown origin, Resident ID #2.Based on clinical record review and staff and resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives timely and appropriate pain and symptom management consistent with professional standards of practice, for end-of life-care including the prompt administration of physician-ordered medications for pain and anxiety, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who were receiving hospice services, Resident ID #1. This failure resulted in the resident experiencing unmanaged pain, terminal agitation, and psychosocial distress during his/her final hours of life.Findings are as follows:According to the American Nurses Association (2018) Position Statement titled, The Ethical Responsibility to Manage Pain and the Suffering It Causes, nurses have an ethical responsibility to relieve pain and suffering through individualized interventions, ongoing assessment, and coordinated approaches to pain management.Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition(s) relative to peripheral vascular disease for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and the soft tissues underneath) and peripheral vascular disease (a condition where narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs). Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is dependent for lower body dressing and putting on/taking his/her shoes. Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/14/2024 alleged that the resident was treated at the hospital on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of each resident relative to skin assessments for 6 of 6 licensed nursing staff reviewed, Staff IDs A, C, D, E, F and G. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Skin Care Program states in part, .The weekly skin assessments (documented under assessments) will be done for every resident . Review of the 2024 Facility Assessment revealed competencies to be provided to staff including, Resident assessment and examinations .skin assessment . Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/14/2024 alleged that the resident was treated at the hospital on 8/4/2024 for multiple wounds to his/her feet. Additionally, maggots were present in the wounds. Review of photographs taken at the hospital dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bruising, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/29/2026 alleged that Resident ID #2 was identified with new significant bruising. The resident's spouse had visited the resident the night prior and there was no bruising. The report further alleged that when the complainant asked about the incident s/he was told two Nursing Assistants (NA) used the wrong equipment to transfer the resident.Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse prohibition states in part, .Injuries of unknown origin .the source of the injury was not observed, or the source cannot be explained by the resident .Investigation .begin the initial investigation .obtain statements from witnesses, notify the appropriate administrative personnel so that a comprehensive internal facility investigation can be carried out .Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with dentures, Resident ID #1. Additionally, the facility failed to have a policy that addressed instances when a resident's dentures are lost or damaged.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/29/2026, alleged the resident's family has been required to purchase several sets of dentures lost by the facility.Record review revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility in September of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed, the resident is edentulous (having no natural teeth).Record review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 6/4/2026 with a score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition.Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation involving an accident resulting in serious injury, which occurred prior to a resident's death, was reported to the appropriate authorities, including the State Survey Agency, as required by State law, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] alleged that Resident ID #1 sustained a fall with a head injury. The complaint further alleged that the resident expired approximately six hours after his/her fall.Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the tissues and cells of the body do not receive enough oxygen to function properly) and heart failure.Record review of a progress note dated, [DATE] at 7:02 PM, authored by Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's care plan is revised by the interdisciplinary team, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to falls, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/3/2026 revealed Resident ID #2 had a fall on 3/30/2026 and was subsequently diagnosed with a left wrist fracture.Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and a history of falls. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 sustained falls on 3/29/2026 and 3/30/2026.Further record review revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital following the 3/30/2026 fall and was subsequently diagnosed with a left wrist fracture. Additional record review revealed that on 4/4/2026, the resident was diagnosed with a left hip fracture.Record review of the resident's care plan revealed a problem area initiated on 3/25/2026 addressing the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders, relative to the transcription and implementation of physician-approved hospice medication orders, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/5/2026 alleged that Resident ID #1 was experiencing terminal agitation and was not provided prescribed medications promptly to provide comfort, relief, and dignity at the end of his/her life.According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses, including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice related to post-fall assessments, neurological monitoring, care plan revision, and adherence to advance directives, for 1 of 1 resident who sustained a fall with head injury, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE], alleged that Resident ID #1 experienced a fall with a head injury and passed away in the facility within 6 hours. The complaint further alleged that the facility failed to implement new or enhanced fall interventions and his/her Advance Directive wishes were not followed.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the tissues and cells of the body do not receive enough oxygen to function…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that hospice services meet professional standards of principles that apply to individuals providing services in the facility for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who are receiving hospice services, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community-reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/5/2026 alleged that Resident ID #1 was admitted to hospice services on 5/1/2026. Additionally, the complaint alleged s/he was experiencing terminal agitation and the facility failed to timely implement hospice recommendations promptly to provide comfort, relief, and dignity at the end of his/her life. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the tissues and cells of the body do not receive enough oxygen to function properly) and heart failure.Record review revealed that the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to keep a resident free of significant medication errors for one of two residents reviewed, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 2/24/2026, alleges in part that on 1/31/20266, a nurse incorrectly transcribed Farxiga (a medication used to treat type 2 diabetes, kidney disease, and congestive heart failure) into the medical records of two residents. The error was identified 18 days later. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, edema and hypokalemia. Record review of a Medication Error Form dated 2/18/2026, revealed that the Nurse Practitioner identified that the resident had been receiving Farxiga 5 milligrams daily, which was intended for another resident. This error persisted for 19 days. Record review of a written statement by the Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bruising, Resident ID #3.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse prohibition states in part, .Injuries of unknown origin .the source of the injury was not observed, or the source cannot be explained by the resident .Investigation .begin the initial investigation .obtain statements from witnesses, notify the appropriate administrative personnel so that a comprehensive internal facility investigation can be carried out .Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in July of 2025, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (an autoimmune disorder that affects the protective layer surrounding peripheral nerves) and lymphedema (an accumulation of protein rich fluid in the body's tissues).Record review of the progress notes revealed the following:-8/26/2025 at 7:26 PM a large bruise was noted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to physician's orders, for 1 of 1 resident who requires two staff members at all times during care, Resident ID #3 and for 1 of 1 resident who requires a cardiology consult, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/28/2025 revealed in part, on 8/27/2025 Resident ID #3 was taken to the shower room and a hospice Nursing Assistant (NA) attended to him/her for his/her shower. During the shower the resident was noted with active bleeding from an unidentified source. A skin assessment was completed, and the resident was observed with an open area to his/her great toe.According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe that the orders are in error or would harm the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,118 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $46,118 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $48K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI