Golden Crest Nursing Centre

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 143.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent a new pressure ulcer from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident ID #7) with a physician's order to off load heels. The physician-ordered intervention to offload the resident's heels was not consistently implemented for Resident ID #7, despite the resident's identified risk factors for pressure ulcer development, including impaired mobility, malnutrition, and a moderate risk score on the Norton Plus Pressure Ulcer Scale (a tool utilized to assess a resident's risk for developing a pressure ulcer). This failure resulted in the development of a deep tissue injury (DTI) to the resident's left heel, which was identified during a skin assessment requested by the surveyor. Findings are as follows:Review of the facility policy last revised in September of 2013 titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, states in part, .Pressure Ulcers are usually formed when a resident remains in the same position for an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2023-10-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #102. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, states in part, .Resident abuse is defined as willful infliction of .unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in .mental anguish; and included mental abuse. Examples of abuse include, but are not limited to the following .mental abuse .threats of punishment or deprivation . Review of the resident record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in April of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizophrenia [characterized by delusions, hallucinations, unusually physical behaviors, and disorganized thinking and speech], obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary monitoring and assistance to maintain proper hydration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:According to Fundamentals of Nursing 7th Edition (2011), .Fluid Balance.The desirable amount of fluid intake.in adult ranges from 1,500 to 3,500 milliliter (mL) each 24 hours, with most people averaging 2,500 to 2,600 mL per day.Parameters to be considered in clinical assessment for fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance.Records may be initiated by the nurse for any patient with a real or potential water or electrolyte problem.Intake should include all fluids taken into the body.If monitoring of a patient's intake.is required, the patient, family, and all caregivers must be alert to the need to measure all fluids entering.the body.Record review of a community reported complaint sent to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/2/2026 alleged in part, that the facility is short staffed and has been letting Resident ID #1's health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident records are complete and accurately documented related to assistance with activities of daily living for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1 and 2.Findings are as follows:According to Fundamentals of Nursing, Seventh Edition dated 2011, states in part, Documenting Nursing Care .Remembering the legal truth 'It wasn't done if it wasn't documented'.Documentation Guidelines.Aim: Complete, accurate, concise, current, factual, and organized data communicated in a timely and confidential manner to facilitate care coordination and serve as a legal document.Record review of a community reported complaint sent to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/2/2026 alleged in part, that the facility is short staffed and has been letting Resident ID #1's health decline.During a surveyor interview on 4/15/2026 at 11:31 AM, with the complainant, s/he alleges that the facility did not have enough staff to assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to accurately maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices relative to 2 of 6 residents reviewed with an identified skin impairment, Resident ID #s 21, and 67 and 1 of 3 residents reviewed who are dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), Resident ID #118.Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed Resident ID #21 was readmitted to the facility in July of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stage 4 pressure injury (full thickness skin loss, involving subcutaneous tissue, exposing muscle and possibly tendon or bone) of the right foot second toe.Record review of wound detail report dated 9/3/2025 at 11:09 AM revealed, Resident ID #21 has an ulcer to the right foot 2nd toe, measuring 0.1 centimeters by 0.1 centimeters.Record review revealed a physician's order dated 12/2/2025 to cleanse the right 2nd toe with wound cleanser, apply Iodosorb (a medication prescribed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, resident representative, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs); for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a delay in personal care, Resident ID #40, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed relative to transfers, Resident ID #118.Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #40 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and diabetes.Record review of a Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident is rarely/never understood and has severe cognitive impairment. Additional record review revealed that s/he is always incontinent of bowel and bladder and is totally dependent on two staff members for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including, toileting, hygiene, and dressing.Record review of the ADL documentation dated 12/8/2025, failed to reveal evidence that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support a resident in his/her choice of activities based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #118.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #118 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and hemiplegia (a paralysis or weakness of the face, arm or leg.)Review of an admission Minimum Data Set assessment, Section F, titled, Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities, dated 9/17/2025 revealed, it is very important for the resident to listen to music.Review of the resident's care plan last revised on 6/25/2024 revealed, the resident has Alzheimer's and is non-verbal with the intervention to ensure the TV or some type of music is available for the resident.Surveyor observations of the resident on the following dates and times failed to reveal evidence that the resident was offered or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized care plans that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment relative to Activities of Daily Living (ADL's, e.g. eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering and bathing, personal hygiene, dressing, rolling to the left and right, all transfers and mobility) for 5 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/5/2024 alleged that Resident ID #1 had fallen out of his/her bed a couple months ago resulting in bruising and a hospital evaluation. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in July of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis (chronic neurological disorder), spastic quadriplegia (a form of cerebral palsy that affects both arms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to storing lidocaine patches in his/her room without an assessment for self-application, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, arthritis and muscle weakness. Review of a physician's order dated 10/1/2024 revealed Lidocaine adhesive patch 4% (a medication prescribed for pain), apply 1 patch to the right shoulder every morning and to be removed at bedtime. Record review failed to reveal evidence of an assessment for the self administration of the medication, which indicated the resident is safe to store and administer his/her medications. During a surveyor observation on 11/4/2024 at approximately 12:00 PM, there was a total of 5 unopened lidocaine patches in the opened manufacturer's box observed in the resident's room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 5 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 2 medication rooms. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Storage of Medications last revised [DATE] states in part, The facility shall store all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner . 1. During a surveyor observation of the 2 East Medication Cart on [DATE] at 8:25 AM, in the presence of Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff E, revealed the following: - 1 bottle of Latanoprost Solution (eye drops used to treat glaucoma) 0.005 % with an open date of [DATE]. Manufacturer's instructions indicate to discard the eye drops 6 weeks after opening, revealing the medication should have been discarded on [DATE]. - 1 bottle of Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5 % (eye drops used to treat high pressure inside the eye)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment and to help prevent the development of infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to the use of a Bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP, a device that provides breathing support which is administered through a face mask or nasal mask) device, Resident ID #77. Findings are as follows: Review of the manufacturer's instructions titled RESVENT IBREESE Series user manual dated July 2017, states in part, .Clean the flexible tube and mask before first use and daily. Disconnect the flexible tube and mask from the device. Gently wash the tube and mask in a solution of warm water and a mild detergent. Rinse thoroughly. Air dry . Record review revealed that Resident ID #77 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where breathing is interrupted repeatedly) and acute respiratory failure. Record review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with medication refusals, Resident ID #73. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 which states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed Resident ID #73 was re-admitted to the facility in August of 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the esophagus, causing irritation and discomfort). Record review revealed a physician's order with a start date of 9/12/2022 for Famotidine (a medication prescribed to treat GERD) 8 milligram (mg)/milliliter (ml), give 2.5 ml once daily. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed the medication was not administered due to the residents refusal on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$70,868 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $30,360 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
• $40,508 — penalty dated 2023-10-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $374K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI