Bethany Home of Rhode Island

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 12.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 33 beds and averages 29.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.39 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.16 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.61 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent an accident while ambulating for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls who sustained significant injuries, multiple fractures of his/her vertebral bones of the spine, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 11/4/2025 revealed that Resident ID #1 was being walked from the toilet to the sink by a staff member and caught his/her foot on the floor and fell, striking the left side of his/her head and landing on his/her back. Additionally, it revealed that the resident sustained multiple fractures to the bones of his/her spine.Record review of the Safe Patient Handling policy indicates that approved patient handling aids shall be used to prevent manual lifting and handling of residents.Review of a hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed a moderate T4 (the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-26 · tag F0813 — widespread
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility policy for food brought in from an outside source failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy titled, Food Brought in From Outside the Facility Policy, dated 6/1/2021, states in part, [NAME] Home has no responsibility should any adverse reaction occur from food(s) when it has been brought into the facility from an outside source .The facility's policy failed to ensure the following requirements that are within regulations:-that staff assist the resident in accessing and consuming the food, if the resident is not able to do so independently-help visitors and family to understand safe food handling practices including, but not limited to, safe cooling and reheating processes, hot and cold holding temperatures, preventing cross contamination, and hand hygiene.During a surveyor interview on 11/26/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM with the Administrator, she acknowledged that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident observed with an insulin pump (a computerized device that delivers a continuous dose of insulin to people with diabetes to manage blood sugar levels), Resident ID #9.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility policy and procedure titled, Self-Administration of Medication by Resident, last revised on 10/16/2025, states in part, Residents may self-administer medications with a physician's orders.The resident will be instructed on the use and reason for the medication, reading of the label, the dosing and schedule. The resident shall then be evaluated on these tasks using the Assessment of Resident's Ability to Self-Medicate Form. The resident will be asked to read the label and indicate what time the medication should be administered. The resident's ability to perform this task will be evaluated by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an insulin pump (a computerized device that delivers a continuous dose of insulin to people with diabetes to manage blood sugar levels) utilization, Resident ID #9, 1 of 2 residents reviewed with parameters for medication administration, Resident ID #22, 1 of 1 resident reviewed related to anticonvulsant symptom monitoring, Resident ID #4, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed related to antipsychotic symptom monitoring, Resident ID #16.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe that the orders are in error or would harm the clients .1. Record review revealed Resident ID #9 was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to provide quality care and respond to each resident's individualized needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who uses an insulin pump (a computerized device that delivers a continuous and precise dose of insulin to people with diabetes to manage blood sugar levels), Resident ID #9.Findings are as follows:Review of the Annual Facility Assessment, last revised on 10/17/2024, revealed in part, .Staff Competencies.nurses are competent in.diabetes .[NAME] Home encourages and financially supports all educational activities and certifications. Support for education in all areas are cornerstone of the mission to provide quality care.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Record review of the care plan revised,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident records are complete and accurately documented, relative to blood sugar monitoring for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #9.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus.Record review revealed a physician's order dated 10/18/2025 to monitor blood glucose prior to meals from Dexcom (a continuous glucose monitor prescribed for people with diabetes to track their glucose levels in real time), prior to meals for type 2 diabetes mellitus.During a surveyor interview on 11/25/2025 at 11:57 AM with Registered Nurse (RN), Staff D, she stated that the resident was receiving finger sticks, three times daily with meals, to obtain the resident's blood sugar levels.Record review failed to reveal evidence of an order to monitor blood glucose utilizing finger sticks, three times daily with meals, to obtain the resident's blood sugar levels.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0623 — widespread
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer or discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 residents who were transferred to the hospital, Resident ID #s 16 and 77. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #16 was initially admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, history of pneumonia, hemiplegia (partial or total paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness to one side of the body) following a stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung disease that makes it difficult to breath) and gastrostomy status (is a surgical procedure to make a hole in the stomach through the abdomen to insert a feeding tube into the stomach). Record review revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 5/2/2024, 5/30/2024 and 7/2/2024. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the hospital transfers for Resident ID # 16. 2. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Additionally, the facility failed to identify that trauma informed care assessments were not being completed, or that enhanced barrier precautions were not being followed appropriately for resident's with multi drug resistant organisms (MDROs) or indwelling medical devices. Findings are as follows: Review of the QAPI binder document titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Projects 2024, revealed that relative to trauma informed care the facility would be reviewing each new admission chart within 24 hours or by the next weekday to ensure that trauma assessments have been completed. Further review failed to reveal evidence of maintenance of the plan, including tracking and measuring performance, and establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to place residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; involves using gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) infection, Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL-an infection that is resistant to multiple antibiotics) Resident ID #s 17 and 18. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct an annual review of written standards, policies, and procedures and update the infection control program as necessary. Findings are as follows: Review of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention document titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) last reviewed 8/1/2023, states in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents right of personal privacy for 3 of 3 residents reviewed relative to indwelling medical devices (devices that enter inside the body), Resident ID #s 16, 77 and 179. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Resident Information states in part, .All facility employees are responsible to maintain the confidentiality of all resident protected health information .Resident health information shall not be left in public areas where unauthorized personnel may see it . 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #16 was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy (is a surgical procedure to make a hole in the stomach through the abdomen to insert a feeding tube into the stomach). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 7 of 7 nursing staff reviewed. Findings are as follows: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandum dated 3/20/2024, provided to the surveyor by the facility, states in part, .Many residents in nursing home are at increased risk of becoming colonized and developing infections with MDROs [Multidrug-resistant Organisms] .'Enhanced Barrier Precautions' (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .EBP are indicated for residents with .Infection or colonization with a CDC [Centers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-11-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI