Warren Operations RI, LLC DBA Warren Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.44 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for anticoagulation therapy (a medication that is prescribed to increase the amount of time it takes for blood to clot), Resident ID #s 4, 8, 62, and 64.Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed Resident ID #4 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate) and history of transient ischemic attack (an episode of stroke-like symptoms caused by a brief blockage of blood flow to the brain).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 5/15/2025 for Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet every morning and at bedtime.Record review of a care plan initiated on 5/26/2025 includes a focus area of risk for injury or complications related to Eliquis (a medication prescribed to prevent strokes and blood clots) usage. Additionally, it revealed interventions to observe for signs of active bleeding including bruising, blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of practice relative to physician's orders, for 1 of 1 resident who receives dialysis ( a medical procedure used to remove waste products and excessive fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to perform this function effectively), Resident ID #7. Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe that the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Record review revealed the following physician's orders:-8/23/2025 cholecalciferol tablet (a dietary supplement) 1,000-unit one tablet daily-8/23/2025 citalopram hydrobromide (an antidepressant) 20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag), Resident ID #s 9, and 62.Findings are as follows:According to Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing Volume 2, 10th Edition, page 1282 states, For patients with indwelling catheters, the nurse assesses the drainage system to ensure that it provides adequate urinary drainage. The color, odor, and volume of urine are also monitored. An accurate record of fluid intake and urine output provides essential information about the adequacy of renal function and urinary drainage.Review of a facility policy titled CATHETER: INDWELLING URINARY-CARE OF states in part, .Monitor urine output color and notify physician.of abnormal changes .1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #9 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, obstructive uropathy (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
  Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to have sufficient staff who provide direct services to residents with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services, including training on caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.Findings are as follows:Record review of the following staff members failed to reveal evidence of trauma informed care in-service training:- Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff D- hired on 5/16/2022- NA, Staff E- hired on 11/2/2024- NA, Staff F- hired on 4/18/2024- NA, Staff G- hired on 4/1/2025During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing Services on 9/19/2025 at 8:57 AM, she acknowledged that the trauma informed care in-service was not completed for the above staff members.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 dialysis resident reviewed, Resident ID #7, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed relative to blood pressure parameters, Resident ID #38.Findings are as follows: Review of a policy titled, Medication Administration revealed in part, .Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident.Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.obtain and record any vital sign as necessary prior to medication administration.Medications to be given with meals are to be scheduled for administration at the resident's meal times.If two consecutive doses of a vital medication are withheld or refused, the physician is notified.1. Record review revealed Resident ID #7 was admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Record review of the physician's orders revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records relative to the posting of past survey results.Findings are as follows:During a surveyor observation of the main lobby area on 9/19/2025 at 7:30 AM, revealed a survey results binder.Record review of the survey results binder revealed copies of a previous recertification survey dated 8/16/2024 including the resident/staff roster which contained identifying information for 12 residents.During a surveyor interview on 9/19/2025 at 12:12 PM with the Administrator, she was unable to provide evidence that the facility protected the identifying information of the 12 residents listed in the survey results binder.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to monitoring of intake and output for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #59.Findings are as follows:According to Nursing, A Concept-Based Approach to Learning, Third Edition, Volume 1 dated 2019, page 366 and 370, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a rapid loss of renal function often accompanied by oliguria (voiding less than 500 milliliter [mL] per day) and electrolyte imbalance. A primary nursing intervention for AKI is closely monitoring the patient's fluid balance by tracking all intake and output over a 24-hour period, including oral fluids, ice chips, liquid foods, parenteral fluids, urine, emesis (vomit), liquid stool, and wound drainage.Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported allegation submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/17/2024 revealed that a family member of the resident alleged that the resident did not receive his/her inhaler resulting in a hospitalization. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 and readmitted in December of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pneumonia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review revealed a physician's order dated November 19, 2024, for Ipratropium-Albuterol solution 0.5-2.5 milligram/3 milliliter inhaler four times a day at 7:30 AM, 11:30 AM, 4:30 PM and 9:30 PM (before meals and at bedtime ), for wheezing and shortness of breath. Record review of the Medication Administration Record failed to reveal evidence that the resident received his/her inhaler on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for a Lidocaine patch, Resident ID #8; for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with orders for heel protectors, Resident ID #22; for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for TED stockings, Resident ID #26; and for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for weight loss, Resident ID #s 29 and 34. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #8 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, mononeuropathy (damage or dysfunction of a single nerve usually affecting hands, arms, or feet) and arthropathy (disease of the joints). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 6/14/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (nursing assistant; NA), at least once every 12 months, for 3 of 3 NA personnel records reviewed, Staff H, I, and J. Findings are as follows: Record review of the personnel files failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed for the following NAs: -Staff H, Date of hire-11/2007 -Staff I, Date of hire- 5/2023 -Staff J, Date of hire- 9/2015 During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing Services on 8/16/2024 at 9:45 AM, she was unable to provide evidence that performance evaluations were completed within the last 12 months for the above-mentioned employees prior to 8/15/2024 when it was brought to her attention by the surveyor.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $898K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI