Avalon Nursing Home INC
57 Stokes Street, Warwick, RI 02889 · For profit - Corporation · 31 certified beds · (401) 738-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.6% | 19.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.2% | 17.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.3% | 16.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.3% | 22.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 40.3% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who experienced actual weight loss, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy and procedure titled WEIGHT, last revised in May of 2023, states in part, .It is the policy of this home to monitor the weight of every resident on a regular basis and to carry out the appropriate interventions when necessary to assure the optimum level of health possible for the individual resident .the facility will ensure that each resident maintains acceptable parameters of body weight unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible .The Director of Nursing will .Ensure that all residents with unplanned weight loss are monitored by the physician and dietician .Calculate weight loss/gains above or below 5 lbs. [pounds] and notify the resident's physician, dietician and DNS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide training to their staff, that at a minimum educates staff on, abuse and neglect.Findings are as follows:Record review of the most recent abuse in-service training sign-in sheet, dated 1/5/2025, titled Staff Sign Off Sheet for Abuse and Neglect, along with a folder containing abuse post-tests provided by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), revealed that only 13 of the 28 listed nursing staff had signed indicating attendance at the abuse training. Further review of the post-tests revealed that only three had been completed by staff. Additionally, the in-service sign-in sheet did not include the Social Worker, dietary staff, housekeeping staff, or maintenance staff.During a surveyor interview on 3/10/2026 at 2:07 PM with the housekeeping/dietary aide, Staff E, she stated that she had never received training related to abuse at the facility.During a surveyor interview on 3/11/2026 at 9:30 AM with Nursing Assistant, Staff B, she stated that she had never received training related to abuse at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours, after the allegation was made, relative to 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse who had a bruise to his/her outer thigh, Resident ID# 1.Findings are as follows:Record review of the facility policy dated 8/2020, titled, Reporting Patient Abuse states in part, .any person that has reason to believe that a patient has been abused.should contact the charge nurse, DNS [Director of Nursing Services] and/or Administrator at the time of the incident .the incident will be reported to the Department of Health.within 2 hours.Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 3/5/2026, alleges that on 3/4/2026, Resident ID #1 reported to the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift nurse that a Nursing Assistant (NA) Staff B, was too rough with him/her on the previous shift, 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM. Upon interview with Resident ID #1, s/he stated that the NA hurried him/her to bed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, who had a bruise to his/her outer thigh, Resident ID #1. Additionally, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. Findings are as follows:Record review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Patient Abuse dated 8/2020 states in part, .any person that has reason to believe that a patient has been abused.should contact the charge nurse, DNS [Director of Nursing Services] and/or Administrator at the time of the incident .A full investigation will be conducted which may include written statements from witnesses as well as the resident.Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 3/5/2026, alleges that on 3/4/2026, Resident ID #1 reported to the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift nurse that a Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff B, was too rough with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to continuous oxygen administration for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 18 and 30, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who had an order to offload their heels, Resident ID #6 and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a hand splint, Resident ID #20. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1a. Record review revealed Resident ID #18 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a lung condition that restricts your breathing) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 4/21/2025 for oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment relative to window air conditioning units, for 4 of 4 air conditioning units observed. Findings are as follows: During surveyor observations on the following dates and times the window air conditioning units in occupied resident rooms were observed to have an accumulation of visible black matter on the adjustable louvers (adjustable flaps) and beyond the louvers within the air conditioners: -5/28/2025 at 10:46 AM and 5/30/2025 at 8:40 AM rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. -5/28/2025 at 11:05 AM and 12:34 PM rooms 13 (C/D) and 14. During a subsequent surveyor observation and simultaneous interview on 5/30/2025 at 8:40 AM with the Director of Nursing Services of rooms 8, 13 (C/D), 14, and 17, he acknowledged that an accumulation of black matter was visible on the adjustable louvers and beyond the louvers within the air conditioners. Additionally, he revealed that the air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective in-service training program including no less than 12 hours per year, to ensure competence of nurse aides (NAs) with their expected roles for 2 of 4 NAs reviewed, Staff D and E. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that NA, Staff D, was hired on 2/3/2017. Additional review revealed that Staff D did not receive at least 12 hours of training in 2024. Record review revealed that NA, Staff E was hired on 3/1/2022. Additional review revealed that Staff E did not receive at least 12 hours of training in 2024. During a surveyor interview on 5/30/2025 at 10:03 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, he was unable to provide evidence of at least 12 hours of training for 2024 for Staff D and E.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect identifying information for 3 of 4 current residents residing in the facility, who were identified in the survey results binder, Resident ID #s 3, 4 and 17. Findings are as follows: During an observation of the facility's surveyor results binder the survey dated 5-16-2024 and the Resident/Staff Roster were revealed. The roster identified Resident ID #s 3, 4, and 17. Further review of the above survey contained information including, but not limited to, the resident's diagnoses and their physician orders. During a surveyor interview with the Administrator on 5/29/2025 at approximately 10:45 AM, following the above observation, he revealed that he was unaware that the Resident/Staff Roster was in the survey binder and that it should not have been. The Administrator was unable to provide evidence that the facility protected the identifying information of the residents listed in the survey results binder.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 2 medication carts and the 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage with a revision date of February 2023 states in part, .Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received .If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding .destroying these items . 1. During the medication storage and labeling task on [DATE] at approximately 9:00 AM through 10:15 AM, in the presence of Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, observation of the treatment cart and the medication room revealed the following: -One vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative (tuberculin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2022 Edition, section 3-501.17 (B) states in part, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED .shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT .and: (1) the day the original container is opened in the food establishment shall be counted as Day 1; and (2) The day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date . 1. During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 5/27/2025 at 9:40 AM, with the Food Service Manager (FSM), the following was observed in the reach-in refrigerator: -One, 5 pound (lb.) container of ricotta cheese approximately ¾ full, opened, with a manufacturer's use by date of 5/22/2025. -One, 2.5lb. sealed package of cooked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or, no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Rhode Island Department of Health- RIDOH), in accordance with State law, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse, Resident ID #s 1 and 2. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy last revised in January of 2024 titled, Reporting Patient Abuse states in part, This facility will report all cases of suspected or actual abuse or neglect to the Department of Health .Any person that has reason to believe that a .resident has been abused, neglected or mistreated should contact the .DNS [Director of Nursing Services .at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 4-601.11 states in part, .(B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT .shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NON-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 5/29/2024 at 8:55 AM and 9:15 AM in the presence of the Administrator, the following was observed: - A microwave on the back counter was noted to have dried food particles, orange and brown in color, on the inside of the door, walls, ceiling and glass turning plate. - In the refrigerator labeled as the Defrosting Fridge in the basement, there were two wrapped pieces of red meat resting directly on the shelves.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO), Resident ID #s 6 and 28. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct appropriate infection control practices relative to personal protective equipment during foley catheter (a flexible tube that is inserted through the urethra to help drain urine from the bladder) removal for 1 of 1 resident observed, Resident ID #3. The facility further failed to implement a water management program based upon industry standards and/or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) toolkit and to perform and document specified testing for the prevention of Legionella disease (a very serious type of lung infection caused by the bacteria called Legionella which can be found in water). This deficient practice could impact 31 of 31 residents, as well as an indeterminable number…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum) receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident ID #19. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (ESRD, when your kidneys can no longer support your body's needs). Record review of the resident's comprehensive care plan revealed that the resident receives dialysis three days a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at 9:45 AM. a) Record review failed to reveal evidence of a physician's order for dialysis to include the name of the center, the type of dialysis, and the scheduled days the resident is to receive dialysis. During a surveyor interview on 5/31/2024 at 10:23 AM with Registered Nurse, Staff A, she acknowledged that there was no order in place relative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, which includes but is not limited to communication, residents rights, abuse, quality assurance and performance improvement, infection control and behavioral health, for all new and existing staff consistent with their expected roles for 4 of 4 staff members reviewed, Staff C, E, F and G. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that Registered Nurse, Staff C, was hired on 3/27/2019. Additional review revealed that Staff C did not receive any mandatory education in 2023. Record review revealed that Registered Nurse, Staff E was hired on 2/15/2022. Additional review revealed that Staff E did not receive any mandatory education in 2023. Record review revealed that Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff F was hired on 2/17/2014. Additional review revealed that Staff F did not receive any mandatory education for all of 2023. Further review revealed that she has not received an annual performance evaluation or 12 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, surveyor observation, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents relative to increased protein for 1 of 1 dialysis resident reviewed, Resident ID #19. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute kidney failure and obesity. Additional review revealed that the resident requires dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum) three times per week. Review of the resident's care plan revealed an intervention including, but not limited to, provide ordered diet. Review of a physician's order dated 3/15/2024 revealed the resident is to have double portions of protein with each meal. Review of a dialysis plan note for February 2024 revealed that the resident's albumin (protein in blood) in February 2024 was 3.1 and below the goal of 4 or higher. Review of the resident's meal ticket for breakfast, lunch and dinner revealed s/he is to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support a resident in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident, based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan and preferences for 3 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 2, and 3. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/8/2024 alleges in part, .No activities for residents . Record review of the May 2024 Activities Calendar provided by the Administrator, revealed one activity was listed for each day without a designated start or end time. Additionally, the calendar indicated that on 5/14/2024 an activity of Beach Ball was to take place. During a surveyor observation on 5/14/2024 from 10:45 AM through 3:00 PM, there was no evidence of a group activity taking place, including but not limited to, Beach Ball.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings are as follows: 1)Record review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage states in part, .all foods should be covered, labeled, dated and routinely monitored to assure that food (including left overs) will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable), or discarded. During the initial tour of the kitchen and storage room on 5/8/2023 at approximately 8:00 AM in the presence of the Cook, Staff F, revealed the following; in the refrigerator labeled Defrosting Fridge/Freezer: -3 unopened 4 oz packages of Block & Barrel Fully cooked sliced roast beef with a use or freeze by date of 4/13/2023 -1 16.96 pound [NAME] Hardwood smoked pit ham with a sell by date of 4/12/2023 In the freezer labeled I Breakfast freezer: -a bag of approximately 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to blood sugar monitoring, Resident ID #6. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review of the facility policy titled, HYPERGLYCEMIA [an excess of glucose in the bloodstream] - THE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT OF, states in part, .If the physician has not indicated otherwise, the facility parameter requiring notice to the physician of hyperglycemia is > [greater than] 400 .The physician is to be immediately informed of the confirmed critical results > 400 per this policy unless a different parameter has been set by the physician .indication of the physician notification and resulting follow up orders and action taken are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status relative to dietary supplements for 3 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 7, 18, and 28. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Weight, states in part, .Monitor residents with unplanned weight loss to ensure that interventions and documentation are appropriate . Review of the record for Resident ID #7 revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the January through April 2023 weight documentation revealed the resident weighed 85 lbs. (pounds) on 1/17/2023 and 77 lbs. on 4/18/2023, indicating a severe weight loss of 8 lbs. or 9.41% in three months. Review of a Registered Dietitian note, dated 4/19/2023, revealed that she spoke with the resident regarding his/her recent four-pound weight loss and discussed an intervention to retrial the magic cup. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use, for 2 of 2 resident's reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident IDs # 2 and 8. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was initially admitted to the facility in March of 2005 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis. Record review of physician's orders revealed an order with a start date of 3/19/2023 for an antibiotic, Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate 500mg (milligram)-125MG. Record review of the March 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the above medication was administered as ordered on 3/19/2023. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #8 was admitted to the facility in January of 2016 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed). Record review of physician's orders revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, relative to individualizing the physical environment of the resident's bedroom, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for call light accessibility, Resident ID #28. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), and right hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body that causes weakness). Record Review of a care plan dated 2/14/2023, states in part, impaired physical mobility (upper extremity) right (lower extremity) right with interventions to place items in reach on left side, call light in reach, left side . During surveyor observations on 5/10/2023 at approximately 8:25 AM and 10:00 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed with his/her call light on the right side of the bed. During a surveyor interview with the resident on 5/10/2023 at approximately 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, surveyor observation, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility has failed to assure that a resident has the right to self-determination with services inside the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed relative to activities, Resident ID #12. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses that include but are not limited to, cerebral vascular accident (stroke) and right sided hemiparesis/hemiplegia (residual weakness due to the stroke). Record review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] page 13 titled, Section F Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities, revealed documentation that it is very important for the resident to do his/her favorite activities while s/he is in the facility. During a surveyor observation on 5/8/2023 at 12:14 PM, revealed the resident was seated in a recliner in the common area. S/he was wearing a sling to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct periodic accurate, standardized reproducible assessments of each resident ' s functional capacity, for 2 of 8 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 5 and 12. Findings are as follows: 1. Record Review for Resident ID #5 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in October of 2021. Further record review failed to reveal evidence that quarterly assessments were completed as required since the last completed quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing Services on 5/9/2023 at approximately 4:10 PM, she acknowledged that the assessments were not completed as required. 2. Review of the RAI manual page 2-21 states in part, .The Annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an SCSA [Significant Change in Status Assessment] .has been completed since the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, relative to fluid restrictions, Resident ID #20. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Fluid Restriction Policy, revealed .resident's with orders for fluid restrictions will have their fluid intake strictly monitored by the charge nurse and total intake will be recorded in the TAR [Treatment Administration Record] daily . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2021 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease, stage 3. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition is intact. Record review of the care plan dated 1/27/2023 revealed a problem of renal failure and to record intake every shift. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident ID #13. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Care, states in part, .It is the policy .to assist residents in obtaining routine and/or emergency dental services . Review of the record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2022 with a diagnosis including but not limited to anemia (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells). Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident has mouth or facial pain and discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Review of the care plan revealed alteration in dental status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer or discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 sample residents who were discharged to the hospital from the facility, Resident ID #s 13 and 14. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #13 was originally admitted to the facility in November of 2018 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, syncope (loss of consciousness due to a drop in blood pressure) and collapse, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review revealed that the resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/2/2024. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #14 was originally admitted to the facility in November of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), rhabdomyolysis (muscle tissue breaking down into the bloodstream), and spondylosis (degenerative disorder of the spine's bones and cartilage) in the lumbar region. Record review revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOWALIK, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| KOWALIK, COLLEEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/07/2014 |
| KOWALIK, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/07/2014 |
| SANTORO, RALPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.