No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Haven Operations Holding LLC Valley View Hea

4 St Joseph Street, Woonsocket, RI 02895 · For profit - Corporation · 185 certified beds · (401) 765-5844 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse4 immediate-jeopardy citations$83,899 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $83,899 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-03)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
55 Hamlet Ave · (401) 766-9500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
450 Clinton St · (401) 767-2120 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
157 Front St · (401) 766-2099 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.7%19.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%17.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%16.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.8%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.8%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.6%22.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table35.0%22.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine55.0%78.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%14.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.751.591.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.101.681.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.6%CMS range 25.1–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–18.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.7–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 166.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-03)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

58 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from neglect relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was left unattended outside of the facility for approximately 3 hours and 20 minutes during a heat advisory resulting in cardiac arrest, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/30/2025 alleged that Resident ID #1 was left unattended outside of the facility for an unknown amount of time on 7/30/2025. The complaint further alleged that the resident was found unconscious, without a pulse and required cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Additionally, the resident was transferred to the hospital for further treatment.Review of the weather report on 7/30/2025 revealed a heat advisory was in effect for the facility's area. According to the National Weather Service, a heat advisory is issued when dangerously high temperatures are expected that could potentially be harmful. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained relative to unsafe water temperatures, for 4 of 4 floors observed. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operation Manual Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 8/8/2024, states in part, .Some States have regulations regarding allowable maximum water temperature .Water may reach hazardous temperatures in hand sinks, showers, tubs, and any other source or location where hot water is accessible to a resident. Burns related to hot water/liquids may also be due to spills and/or immersion .skin in relation to the temperature of the water and the length of time of exposure .Time Required for a 3rd Degree Burn to Occur .133° F, 15 seconds . According to TITLE 216 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CHAPTER 40 - PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND FACILITY REGULATION, SUBCHAPTER 10 - FACILITIES REGULATION, PART 1 - Licensing of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was assessed to be a moderate risk for wandering, previously displayed exit seeing behavior and was able to successfully elope from the facility, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled Elopement dated 4/10/2018, states in part, .Elopement - leaving the facility without permission and/or notification to the facility .An assessment will be completed within 24-hours of admission. 1. A re-assessment will be completed for any resident who demonstrates any of the following: Verbalizing a desire to leave the building .exit seeking .A resident assesses to be at risk. The following actions may be employed: 1. Application of a wanderguard 2. Initiation of frequent checks 3. Initiate Care Plan 4. Room transfer to a secure area 5. Residents at risk for elopement identified to appropriate staff . Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident hazard for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident sent to the Rhode Island Department of Health on [DATE] stated in part, Resident was noted to be missing from unit .Resident found by staff on nearby street. Review of a facility policy titled, Elopement, states in part, It is the intent of this policy to ensure the resident's right to a safe and secure environment . Review of an additional facility policy titled ELOPEMENT POLICY CODE PURPLE, states in part, It is the policy of [NAME] Health and Rehabilitation Center to prevent elopement of residents, particularly with Dementia . Review of the resident's record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in February of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified dementia, major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 wound treatments observed, Resident ID #129. Findings are as follows: Record review of an undated facility policy titled, Wounds - Dressing Changes, states in part, .This policy and procedure intent is to ensure that .resident's skin integrity is addressed appropriately. Dressing changes will be done based on the physician orders using clean dressing change procedure .1. Upon discovery of a new skin integrity issue, the nurse will .Assess and measure the wound .The charge nurse will notify the physician, resident representative .and wound nurse .Order entered for treatment for wound .Nurse note written with a description of alteration in skin integrity, treatment initiated, and notification to the physician . Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 2 of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident ID #s 98 and 129. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring Policy dated 2/24/2017, states in part, .All residents are to be weighed on a monthly basis between the first and the sixth of the month .If the weight is +/- [greater than/less than] 3 pounds from the previous weekly weight or +/- 5% on a monthly the resident is to be removed from the scale and reweighed (this needs to be done no later than within 24 hours for the questionable weight) .The dietician will review the weights and determine if additional intervention may need to be added . 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #98 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 wound treatments observed, Resident ID #79. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities last revised on 2/3/2023 states in part, .Because pain can significantly affect a person's well-being, it is important that the facility recognize and address pain promptly. The facility's evaluation of the resident at admission and during ongoing assessments helps identify the resident who is experiencing pain or for whom pain may be anticipated during specific procedures, care, or treatment . Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in March of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis (an infection in the blood stream)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus.1a. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 8/7/2025 for Humalog Insulin (a short acting insulin); 100 unit/milliliter (mL); before meals inject as per sliding scale:-Blood Sugar is 150 to 199, give 2 Units. -Blood Sugar is 200 to 249, give 4 Units. -Blood Sugar is 250 to 299, give 6 Units. -Blood Sugar is 300 to 349, give 8 Units. -Blood Sugar is greater than 350, call MD (medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving amoxicillin-clavalanate (an antibiotic) and divalproex (a medication used to treat mood disorders) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed requiring insulin, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration dated 10/11/2017 states in part, It is the intent of this policy to ensure that resident medication administration is managed to ensure for resident quality of life, timeliness and safety .When transcribing an order to the MAR [Medication Administration Record].the nurse will take into consideration the purpose of administering the medication and assign the appropriate time.Medications are administered within one hour of the time noted on MAR .Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus, mood disorder, and sepsis (a serious condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed ensure the director of food and nutrition services met the minimum qualifications of a Certified Food Safety Manager. Findings are as follows: Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, Section 2-102.12 Certified Food Protection Manager states in part .at least one employee that has supervisory and management responsibility and the authority to direct and control food preparation and service shall be a certified food protection manager . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/24/2025 at 8:50 AM, surveyor observations failed to reveal evidence of a certification of a Food Safety Manager for the Food Service Director (FSD). Subsequently the FSD indicated that he had obtained the required education and certification and would present it at a later date. During a surveyor interview on 2/25/2025 at approximately 9:30 AM, the FSD presented a Certificate of Completion for a Food Handler Training Course. The surveyor informed the FSD that the document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Director of Food and Nutrition Services met the minimum qualifications of a Certified Food Safety Manager for 1 of 1 Food Service Director (FSD) reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 4 of 4 kitchenettes. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, Section 2-102.12 Certified Food Protection Manager states in part .at least one employee that has supervisory and management responsibility and the authority to direct and control food preparation and service shall be a certified food protection manager . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/24/2025 at 8:50 AM, surveyor observations failed to reveal evidence of a certification of a Food Safety Manager for the FSD. Subsequently the FSD indicated that he had obtained the required education and certification and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (a type of treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to.), Resident ID #s 35 and 137, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #161, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds infected with a Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO), Resident ID #83 and 1 of 2 closed records reviewed, Resident ID #169. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual last revised in October 2024 states in part, .Code peritoneal or renal dialysis which occurs at the nursing home or at another facility . 1a. Record review revealed Resident ID #35 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments relative to 29 of 29 long term care residents reviewed, Resident ID #s, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29, 35, 38, 44, 67, 70, 75, 78, 83, 88, 95, 123, 129, 137, 139, 140, 142, 161, and 520. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was originally admitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus type 2 and chronic heart failure. Record review revealed the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed on 12/17/2024. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the resident's care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team following the quarterly assessment. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #5 was originally admitted to the facility in September of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to Narcan administration, Resident ID #25, 2 of 6 residents reviewed for following physician orders relative to unnecessary medication, Resident ID #s 44 and 123, 1 of 1 resident seen by the podiatrist, Resident ID #78, 1 of 2 residents observed with a non-pressure wound, Resident ID #83 and 1 of 3 residents receiving a medication that requires blood levels to be monitored, Resident ID #95. Findings are as follows: 1. According to the facility policy titled Narcan Administration, states in part, .Policy: Narcan administration is for the occurrence of an opioid overdose. An opioid overdose is an acute condition in the case of excessive opioid use. Narcan should be administered in emergency cases of overdose . PROCEDURE: 1. An assessment for substance use disorder (SUD) will be done upon admission for each resident . 2. Consideration of a clinical overdose could include: use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for suctioning, Resident ID #96. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #96 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia (a condition resulting in difficulty swallowing food or liquid), aspiration pneumonia (infection of the lungs caused by inhaling saliva, food, liquid, vomit), and acute respiratory failure. Record review of a facility document titled, Policy for Suctioning a Patient states in part, .The purpose of this policy is to establish clear and comprehensive guidelines for performing suctioning procedures to maintain airway patency, prevent respiratory distress and ensure patient safety .infection control: Use sterile technique for invasive suctioning. Dispose of used catheters and gloves appropriately. Clean and disinfect suction equipment after each use . Record review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 of 8 medication carts observed on 3 of 4 units and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Findings are as follows: 1. During a surveyor observation on 2/26/2025 at 3:57 PM of the 3rd floor medication room, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff J the following was revealed: -One bottle of Lorazepam Intensol, opened without a date. Review of the manufacturer's instructions indicate to discard the Lorazepam 90 days after opening. During a surveyor interview with Staff J, he acknowledged that the Lorazepam Intensol was opened without a date and revealed medications should be dated when opened. 2. During a surveyor observation on 2/26/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM of a 2nd floor unit medication cart, in the presence of Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff F, the following was revealed: -One bottle of Active Critical Care Protein supplement, opened without a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide food that is palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 2/25/2025 alleges concerns regarding hot food items that are being served cold and at an unappetizing temperature. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 edition, Section 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety, Hot and Cold Holding states, .(A) Except during preparation, cooking or cooling .time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained: (1) At 57 degrees Celsius (135 degrees Fahrenheit, F) or above . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #10 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2021 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to contact precautions (utilized when a resident is known or suspected to be infected with a Multidrug Resistant Organism [MDRO] that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces in the resident's room), for 3 of 3 residents reviewed on contact precautions, Resident ID #s 25, 38, and 83; for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) Resident ID #s 3, 123 and 161; and for the handling of soiled linen in the laundry room. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Isolation states in part, .Contact precautions require the use of appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for all newly hired employees, consistent with their expected roles, relative to orientation education, as outlined in the facility assessment, for 4 of 5 newly hired employees, Staff J, X, Y, and the Food Service Director (FSD). Findings are as follows: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 7/18/2024, states in part, .Training topics upon hire and annually for all staff: - Abuse, neglect, and mandatory reporting - Activities that constitute abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property, Procedures for reporting incidents, of abuse, neglect, or the misappropriation of resident property - Corporate compliance - program overview; what to report and how to report noncompliance; standard of care/ensuring quality - Cultural competency - Customer service - Dementia care - person - centered care for the cognitively impaired .eight hours within 120 days of hire for all direct caregivers .two hours upon hire and annually for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that they not employ or otherwise engage individuals who have been found guilty of abuse or mistreatment by a court of law, for 1 of 1 personnel record reviewed for disqualifying information, Maintenance Assistant, Staff A. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse prohibition states in part, .DEFINITIONS: Abuse: Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting in physical harm, pain, or mental anguish and included physical, verbal, sexual, and mental abuse .Any person seeking employment at this facility (which involves routine contact with a resident without the presence of other employees) shall be subject to a criminal background check, which is to initiated .The employee, through the employer, shall apply to the bureau of criminal identification [BCI] of the state or local police department for a statewide criminal records check .If the facility receives notice of disqualifying information regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan relative to 1 of 3 wounds observed, Resident ID #137. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #137 was readmitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acquired absence of right leg below the knee and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of a progress note dated 2/12/2025 revealed, the resident had an abrasion to his/her right knee. Review of a progress note dated 2/19/2025 revealed, the resident has a wound to his/her right knee. During a surveyor observation on 2/26/2025 at 10:00 AM, revealed a wound dressing to the resident's right knee wound with a date of 2/23/2025, 3 days prior to the wound observation. Record review failed to reveal a physician's order to care for the right knee wound. Record review failed to reveal evidence that at the time the wound was identified on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident observed with a pressure ulcer, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: According to Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) Tool for General Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Across Settings .Wound Care Facilitator Guide from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last revised on 1/27/2023, states in part, .Maintain separation between clean and soiled equipment to prevent cross contamination .Any unused disposable supplies that enter the patient/resident's care area should remain dedicated to that patient/resident or be discarded. They should not be returned to the clean supply area. If supplies are dedicated to an individual patient/resident, they should be properly labeled and stored in a manner to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a nephrostomy tube (PCN, a catheter that is inserted through your skin and into your kidney), Resident ID #64. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #64 was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked). Record review of a hospital discharge document titled, Discharge Summary dated 2/6/2025 revealed an order to irrigate the PCN tube with 10 milliliters of normal saline daily and as needed. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the PCN tube was flushed from 2/7/2025 until 2/27/2025, for a total of 21 days. During a surveyor interview on 2/26/2025 at 10:29 AM with the resident, s/he indicated that his/her PCN tube was last flushed in the hospital prior to coming to the facility. During a surveyor interview on 2/27/2025 at 1:06…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for warfarin (Coumadin, a medication prescribed to prevent blood clots), Resident ID #23. Findings are as follows: Review of a policy titled Guidelines for Anticoagulation Management states in part, .When ordering the anticoagulant, the physician is to indicate the indication for the therapy and the desired therapeutic range .Whenever an anticoagulation therapy is administered it is to be monitored by evaluating the effect on the PT/INR [prothrombin time test/international normalized ratio, a test used to evaluate the therapeutic ranges for warfarin] .Any changes in coumadin dosage will be made accordingly. An order must be received from the MD [Medical Doctor] for the lab work . Review of a document titled A Guide to Taking Warfarin created by the American Heart Association, states in part, .It's important to monitor the INR at least once a month and sometimes as often as twice weekly to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 2 reviewed for warfarin (Coumadin, a medication prescribed to prevent blood clots), Resident ID #23 and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with an elevated white blood count (WBC), Resident ID #420. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a policy titled Guidelines for Anticoagulation Management states in part, .Whenever an anticoagulation therapy is administered it is to be monitored by evaluating the effect on the PT/INR [prothrombin time test/international normalized ratio, a test used to evaluate the therapeutic ranges for warfarin] .Any changes in Coumadin dosage will be made accordingly. An order must be received from the MD [Medical Doctor] for the lab work . Review of a document titled A Guide to Taking Warfarin created by the American Heart Association, states in part, .It's important to monitor the INR at least once a month and sometimes as often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 nursing units observed. Findings are as follows: Record review of community reported complaints submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 1/2/2025 and 1/3/2025, alleged that the facility has mold in the windows and ceiling tiles that making the residents sick. During a surveyor interview with the Maintenance Director in the presence of the Administrator on 1/10/2025 at 9:00 AM, the Maintenance Director revealed that the maintenance staff conducts environmental rounds every month. The Maintenance Director further revealed that they have maintenance staff and housekeepers assigned on each nursing unit. Additionally, the Maintenance Director revealed that they have a maintenance logbook on each nursing unit that staff uses to communicate with maintenance staff and housekeepers. Furthermore, the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, relative to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- which is inserted into a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility assessment, last revised in January of 2024, revealed that the facility has the ability to provide intravenous (IV) therapy to their residents. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type II diabetes mellitus, acute kidney injury, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device of unspecified site, and sepsis (potentially life-threatening infection of the blood stream). Additionally record review revealed that upon admission, the resident had a PICC line and was prescribed to receive IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/19/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 has not received his/her methadone (a medication used to treat opioid use disorder) and other medications for two days. The complaint further indicates that the resident tried to speak with the facility staff about this and was told they were checking with the pharmacy. Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis (a potentially life-threatening infection in the blood), history of opioid abuse, type II diabetes mellitus, acute kidney injury, and infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/19/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 has not received his/her methadone (a medication used to treat opioid use disorder) and other medications for two days. The complaint further indicates that the resident tried to speak with the facility staff about this and was told they were checking with the pharmacy. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, sepsis (a potentially life-threatening infection in the blood), history of opioid abuse, type II diabetes mellitus, acute kidney injury, and infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device (surgical procedure used to internally set and stabilize fractured bones). Review of a physician's order dated 6/17/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 2 of 2 ice machines. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 edition, Section 3-602.11 Food Labels states, .(B) Label information shall include: (1) The common name of the food . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 3/10/2024 at 8:18 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the following food items were observed with no label: - In the walk-in refrigerator, two bags of hard-boiled eggs were sitting in clear liquid. - In the walk-in freezer, one opened plastic bag of French toast, noted to have white covering the edges, indicating freezer burn. During a surveyor interview, immediately following the above observations, the FSD acknowledged both items and indicated they should be discarded. 2. The Rhode Island Food Code 4.601.11 reads in part, .the non-food contact surfaces of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living relative to incontinence care for 1 out of 1 incidence of incontinence care observed, Resident ID #129 and relative to the weekly scheduled showers for 9 out of 32 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 11, 38, 41, 46, 63, 82, 112, and 118. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #129 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pressure ulcer of the sacral region (tail bone area), stage 4 (severe type of pressure ulcer, the skin is severely damaged, and the surrounding tissue begins to die (necrosis) may extend to muscle and bone), muscle weakness, and dementia. Record review of a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15, indicating severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 6 of 32 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 7, 42, 48, 70, 112 and 123. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration states, It is the intent of this policy to ensure that resident medication administration is managed to ensure for resident quality of life, timeliness and safety. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #48 was readmitted to the facility in December of 2020 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder and borderline personality disorder. Record review revealed the following physician orders: Ambien oral tablet 5 milligram (MG, hypnotic), give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. Oxycodone oral tablet 10 MG, give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the medication was not administered and coded as 9, (see nurses note) on the following dates: Ambien on 3/6, 3/7, 3/8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to 2 of 3 residents observed for a wound dressing change, Resident ID #s 87 and 105. Additionally, the facility staff failed to conduct appropriate infection control practices relative to hand hygiene for 4 of 4 residents observed during the medication administration task, Resident ID #s 7, 33, 86, and 443. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Wounds - Dressing Changes states in part, .Procedure for Dressing Change .7. Nurse will remove soiled dressing and dispose of properly .9. Remove the dirty gloves and dispose of properly 10. Hand hygiene will be performed and the nurse will don clean gloves 11. Cleanse the incision [wound] . 1a) Record review revealed Resident ID #87 was admitted to the facility in December of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Department of Health), in accordance with State law, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, Resident ID #129. Findings are as follows: Record review of an undated facility policy titled, Resident Abuse Prohibition, states in part, .Any instance .including injuries of unknown origins .must be reported immediately to the DNS [Director of Nursing Services]/designee .The Department of Health and the Alliance for Better Long Term Care will be contacted to report all alleged violations .including injuries of unknown source .immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for carbon dioxide retention, Resident ID #3, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for off-loading heel booties, Resident ID #66, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for knee splints, Resident ID #75, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for edema (swelling), Resident ID #105. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Review of a document titled Lab Results Report dated 2/5/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 5 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag), Resident ID #s 79 and 129. Findings are as follows: According to Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing Volume 2, 10th Edition, page 252 states the usual daily urine volume in the adult is 1-2 Liters or 1000-2000 cubic centimeters (cc). According to Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing Volume 2, 10th Edition, page 1282 states, For patients with indwelling catheters, the nurse assesses the drainage system to ensure that it provides adequate urinary drainage. The color, odor, and volume of urine are also monitored. An accurate record of fluid intake and urine output provides essential information about the adequacy of renal function and urinary drainage. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #79 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 25 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 8%, involving Resident ID #s 7 and 86. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #86 has a physician's order for Eliquis 5 milligrams give 1 tablet every morning and night related to septic pulmonary embolism (infected blood clot in the lung). During a surveyor observation of the medication administration task on 3/11/2024 at 10:15 AM with Registered Nurse, Staff O, she failed to administer the morning dose of Eliquis to the resident as ordered. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation with Staff O, she acknowledged that Resident ID #86 did not receive his/her Eliquis. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #7 has a physician's order for Fluticasone Proprionate nasal suspension 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for heel boots, Resident ID #66 and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for off-loading wounds and elevating legs, Residents ID #105. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #66 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stage 4 pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the right buttock, fusion of the spine and abnormal posture. Further record review revealed a physician's order dated 10/25/2023 for heel boots to bilateral feet every shift as tolerated for wound care. During surveyor observations on the following date and times there was no evidence of the bilateral heel boots observed: - 3/10/2024 at 9:18 AM - 3/10/2024 at 11:00 AM - 3/10/2024 at 12:05 PM - 3/11/2024 at 8:42 AM - 3/11/2024 at 11:14 AM - 3/11/2024 at 1:00 PM Review of March 2024 Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, sanitary, homelike environment relative to mouse droppings in resident rooms for 2 of 4 units reviewed. Findings are as follows: Record review of two community reported complaints submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) on 2/5/2024 and on 2/7/2024 allege that mice are present in the resident rooms and throughout the building. During a surveyor interview with Resident ID #1 on 2/6/2024 at 9:54 AM, s/he revealed that on the second day of his/her admission, s/he saw a mouse run across the room and since then s/he has seen up to three mice at once in his/her room. The resident further revealed s/he is uncomfortable with the mouse droppings in the room which s/he indicated is unsanitary. The resident's roommate also revealed similar concerns. 1. Surveyor observations on the First floor and Second floor on 2/6/2024 at 10:00 AM revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss, Resident ID #s 2 and 3. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility provided document titled Weight Monitoring Policy states in part, .all residents are to be weighed on a monthly basis .Some residents are weighed daily or weekly. Residents with orders for daily weights will have resident-specific parameters within the order to notify the MD [Medical Doctor] if weight variance of (i.e, 3-pound discrepancy in one day or 5-pound discrepancy in one week). Residents will be weighted on either a stand/sit scale or a Hoyer scale. If the weight is +/- 3 pounds from the previous weekly weight or +/- 5% on a monthly the resident is to be removed from the scale and reweighed (this needs to be no later than 24 hours of the questionable weight) .If the re-weight is accurate and there has been a significant weight loss, the nursing must notify the following . Physician Dietician DNS Administrator .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with pressure ulcers, Resident ID # 1. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified dementia and diabetes mellitus, type II. Review of a physician order dated 7/26/2023 revealed to cleanse right lateral heel wound with normal saline, apply house barrier cream to the skin surrounding the wound, then place calcium alginate with silver (highly absorbent wound dressing) to the wound bed and cover with island bordered gauze followed by tubi-grip (self adhesive ACE bandage), daily. Review of a document titled WOUND EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT SUMMARY, dated 8/15/2023, revealed the resident has a stage 4 pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/22/2023 at 8:42 AM in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) revealed the following observations: - 1 black hot beverage pitcher shelved with all clean ready to use pitchers which had approximately 1 inch of brown liquid inside of it. - 1 La Choy 1 gallon Soy sauce bottle, opened, in use and not dated - Scrambled eggs in a metal hotel pan dated 2/15 in the walk-in refrigerator - Tuna salad in a metal hotel pan dated 2/14 in the walk-in refrigerator - Ice build-up approximately 8 inches in length and 5 inches in width on top of plastic covered pies. The unit with fan above the pies had noted icicles formed approximately 2 inches in length dripping towards the pies. During a surveyor interview with the FSD immediately following each observation, she acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic. Findings are as follows: Review of the antibiotic stewardship monthly records failed to reveal documentation of tracking information for the months of October, November, December of 2022 and January 2023, which included diagnostic tests including, but not limited to, laboratory results, x-rays, or cultures and test results to ensure the appropriate antibiotics were prescribed. Further review failed to reveal evidence of a system for monitoring or reviewing each resident's response to antibiotics. During a surveyor interview on 2/27/2023 at 10:40 AM with the Acting Infection Control Nurse, she was unable to provide evidence of an antibiotic stewardship program from October 2022 through January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical status or a need to alter treatment significantly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 13 and 94. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #13 was admitted to the facility in August 2010 with a diagnosis including, but is not limited to, urinary incontinence. Record review revealed a progress note dated 11/11/2022 at 9:02 AM which states in part, Resident had minimal menstrual bleeding today after years of not . Additional record review failed to reveal evidence that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Physician were notified of the resident having bleeding. Additional record review revealed a progress note dated 12/26/2022 at 2:59 PM which states in part, 911 called due to resident showing signs of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident ID #123. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #123 was admitted to the facility in December of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A. Review of the documents titled, Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated 1/31/2023, 2/7/2023, 2/14/2023 and 2/21/2023, revealed that the resident has an unstageable DTI (deep tissue injury) to the right lateral heel and right lateral foot. Additionally, the summaries revealed that s/he has an unstageable DTI to the left lateral heel, left lateral foot and left plantar foot with a recommendation to off-load wound, float heels in bed and elevate legs. Review of the physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for care of a resident for 3 of 7 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter, Resident ID #s 41, 32 and 5. Findings are as follows: 1. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009, states in part, .Proper techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance .Do not rest the bag on the floor . Record review for Resident ID #41 revealed that s/he was readmitted to the facility in April of 2020 and has diagnoses including, but not limited to, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction (swelling of the kidney due to build up of urine), urinary tract infections, and retention of urine. During surveyor observations revealed the resident's urinary drainage bag was resting on the floor on the side of the bed on 2/23/2023 at 9:01 AM, 1:09 PM, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records on each resident are accurately documented for 1 of 26 residents reviewed relative to medication administration, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follow: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, generalized anxiety and weakness. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/2/2023 for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 MCG [micrograms]/ACT (fluticasone Propionate Nasal) 1 spray in each nostril in the morning for nasal congestion . During a surveyor interview with Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff L, on 2/27/2023 at 9:33 AM, she revealed that the resident did not receive the medication due to it not being available but she documented it as being administered. During a surveyor interview with Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff I, on 2/27/2023 at 9:57 AM, she revealed the Fluticasone Propionate has not been administered since it was ordered on 1/2/2023 because it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 26 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 107 and 94. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility's policy titled Call Light Policy states in part .The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's request and needs .when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . 1. Record review for Resident ID #107 revealed s/he was originally admitted to the facility in November of 2020 and has diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side one the body), muscle weakness and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly provide notice to residents and/or representatives informing where changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or the medical state plan related to the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) for 2 of 3 residents discharged from Medicare Part A Services, Resident ID#s 87 and 123. Findings are as follows: Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) document (Form CMS-10055), titled, Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN), states in part: Medicare requires SNFs [Skilled Nursing Facilities] to issue the SNFABN to Original Medicare, also called fee-for-service (FFS), beneficiaries prior to providing care that Medicare usually covers, but may not pay for in this instance because the care is: - not medically reasonable and necessary; - or considered custodial. The SNFABN provides information to the beneficiary so that s/he can decide whether or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Department of Health), in accordance with State law for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and injury of unknown origin, Residents ID #s 100 and 21. Findings are as follows The facility policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prohibition revised on 10/31/2022, states in part; .All allegations of violations defined in this policy must be reported immediately to the Department of Health, Division of Facility Regulation .This means as soon as possible not to exceed 2 hours after the discovery . 1. Record review for Resident ID #100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2022 with diagnoses including, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living, relative to nail care for 1 of 3 residents observed, Residents ID #70. Findings are as follows: Record review of Resident ID #70 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, muscle weakness, altered mental status and cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed s/he is coded as requiring Total dependence for personal hygiene and requires one person physical assistance. During a surveyor observation on 2/22/2023 at approximately 10:00 AM, the resident was observed with all fingernails approximately 1 centimeter long. There was brown and black matter underneath all of the fingernails. During a surveyor interview immediately following the observation, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility has failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #s 127 and 89. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Falls Prevention Program states in part, Procedure: .6. Any and all immediate fall prevention interventions are to be added to the resident's care plan at that time . Record review revealed that Resident ID #127 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unsteadiness on feet and lack of coordination. Review of a Morse Fall Scale dated 2/5/2023 revealed s/he is a high fall risk. Review of the resident's care plan revealed s/he is a high risk for falls related to confusion and poor comprehension. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident utilized a walker and required limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status, such as usual body weight and failed to follow their policy relative to weight loss and weight gain for 2 of 9 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 123 and 32. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring Policy dated 2/24/2017, states in part, All residents are to be weighed at least monthly so as to monitor for weight loss, to assess for underlying causes of weight loss and to intervene accordingly in a timely manner to allow for an optimal level for well-being .if the weight is +/-3 pounds from previous month, the resident is to be removed from scale and reweighed immediately .If the re-weight is accurate and there has been a significant weight loss, nursing must notify the following: physician, dietician .After the unit manager reviews the report and a weight loss has been confirmed, the resident will be placed on weekly weights. The dietician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident ID #43. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled Oxygen Administration states in part, .Procedure .Check the physician's order for liter flow and method of administration .Documentation .Ensure that a physician's order has been obtained . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review revealed a care plan dated 4/20/2022 which states in part, .has oxygen therapy r/t [related to] COPD .Give medications as ordered by physician . During surveyor observations on 2/22/2023 at 9:04 AM, 2/23/2023 at 8:21 AM, and 2/24/2023 at approximately 8:20 AM revealed the resident receiving oxygen therapy at 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide routine medication to its residents for 1 of 26 residents reviewed, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, generalized anxiety and weakness. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/2/2023 for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 MCG [micrograms]/ACT (fluticasone Propionate Nasal) 1 spray in each nostril in the morning for nasal congestion . Record review for January and February 2023 revealed the medication was not administered per the physician's order. During a surveyor interview with Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff F on 2/27/2023 at 9:57 AM, she revealed the above medication has not been administered since it was ordered on 1/2/2023. During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/27/2023 at 12:17 PM, she acknowledged that the medication was unavailable and it was not administered as ordered. During a surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents relative to the timeliness of the services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #98. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of a pharmacy consultation report dated 12/23/2022 revealed a recommendation to obtain a Fasting A1C (a blood test to obtain the three-month average of blood sugar) on the next convenient lab day and then annually following that result. Additionally, the recommendation was signed by the physician on 12/31/2022 to be implemented with added instruction to check the A1C every six months following the initial test. Review of a physician's order dated 1/17/2023 revealed an order to obtain a fasting A1C on 2/1/2023. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the fasting A1C was obtained as ordered. During a surveyor interview on 2/27/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-01 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to promptly notify the practitioner of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges for 1 of 1 residents reviewed relative to abnormal X-ray results, Resident ID #100. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, paraplegia (paralysis of all or part of your trunk, legs, and pelvic organs) and Cauda Equina Syndrome (when a bundle of nerves below the end of the spinal cord is damaged). Record review revealed a progress note dated 2/16/2023 at 10:47 PM that states in part, .resident showed nurse a fist size bruise to right upper ribs. With gentle palpation, [s/he] could feel some pain. Spoke with on call MD [physician] at .office who approved x-ray to ribs on 2-17-23 . Record review of x-ray results dated 2/17/2023 revealed in part, .Right rib bruising .Old fracture of the right eighth rib . Additional record review failed to reveal evidence that the x-ray results dated 2/17/2023 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly provide notice to residents and/or representatives informing when changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or the state medical plan related to the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) of Non-coverage Form for 2 of 4 residents discharged from Medicare Part A Services that remained in the facility, Resident ID #s 111 and 143. Findings are as follows: Review of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form, CMS 100-55, titled Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage, states in part: Medicare requires SNFs [Skilled Nursing Facilities] to issue the SNFABN to Original Medicare, also called fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries prior to providing care that Medicare usually covers, but may not pay for in this instance because the care is: - not medically reasonable and necessary. - or considered custodial. The SNFABN provides information to the beneficiary so that s/he can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$83,899 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $20,257 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-11-20
  • $16,559 — penalty dated 2024-03-15
  • $25,373 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
  • $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-28 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMERICAN SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES RI I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/19/2014
ASLC OPCO RI I, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
BARNHILL, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
FLANAGAN, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/19/2014
JOSEPH, RUDYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/01/2021
JBF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/19/2014
WHEELER-OMIUNU, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$420K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 1%Other / private 13%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $420K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$277per resident / day
operating cost
$8,424per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$201per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Rhode Island
$12,106/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,383/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,781/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415079. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next