Woonsocket Health Center
262 Poplar Street, Woonsocket, RI 02895 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (401) 765-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2023
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 19.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 17.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.8% | 16.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.5% | 22.3% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.4% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.9% | 78.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.9% | 14.6% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.5%CMS range 33.2–53.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.5–16.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.9–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 133.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2023-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to a norovirus outbreak for 4 of 4 units and Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident ID #79. Findings are as follows: During surveyor observations on 3/20/2023 through 3/23/2023 failed to reveal any signage posted indicating that the facility was experiencing a Gastrointestinal Illness Outbreak. 1. Review of a facility provided document titled Norovirus in Healthcare Facilities Fact Sheet revealed that noroviruses are highly contagious and are transmitted by direct person-to-person spread. Additionally, noroviruses can also spread via a droplet route from vomitus. Review of an additional document provided by the facility titled Key Infection Control Recommendations for Control of Norovirus Outbreak in Healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement from the facility for 1 of 4 closed records reviewed, Resident ID #127. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Elopement Policy and Procedure states in part, Policy: To determine and safely return residents whom cannot be accounted for .Notify Authorities .call police. Provide picture, description of resident of clothing, advisory such as specific medical conditions, possible destination (i.e. relatives, former residence) .If the resident has not been located within two hours: a. copy resident photograph and prepare for mass distribution b. Call all off-duty supervisory staff to assist in search c. broaden search area. Review of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities last revised 10/21/2022, states in part, .A situation in which a resident with decision-making capacity leaves the facility intentionally would generally not be considered an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: 1. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 2-402.11, states in part, .food employees shall wear .beard restraints .that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food . During surveyor observations of the main kitchen on the following dates and times revealed Dietary Aide, Staff F, who has full facial hair, preparing food without a beard restraint: - 3/31/2025 at approximately 9:45 AM - 4/2/2025 at 10:12 AM During a surveyor interview immediately following the above observation on 4/2/2025 with the Food Service Director (FSD), he acknowledged that Staff F was not wearing a beard restraint and indicated that one is required. 2. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 5-202.13 states in part, An air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the PLUMBING…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for peritoneal dialysis (PD, a treatment for kidney failure that uses the lining of the abdomen to filter waste products from the blood), Resident ID #101 and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hemodialysis (a type of dialysis that filters blood to remove waste products and excess fluids), Resident ID #s 30 and 76. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #101 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Record review revealed a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for antibiotic orders, Resident ID #s 2, 101, 114, and 374. Findings are as follows: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes states in part, Standardize the practices which should be applied during the care of any resident suspected of an infection or started on an antibiotic. These practices include improving the evaluation and communication of clinical signs and symptoms when a resident is first suspected of having an infection, optimizing the use of diagnostic testing, and implementing an antibiotic review process, also known as an antibiotic time-out, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation that the resident either received the pneumococcal vaccination or did not receive the vaccination due to medical contraindications or refusal, for 4 of 5 residents reviewed, Residents ID #s 3, 4, 39, and 101. Findings are follows: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical conditions or 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23 [type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination], the PCV15 [type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine] or PCV20 [type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine] dose should be administered at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. For adults 19 through [AGE] years old who have certain chronic medical indications who have only received PCV13 [type of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine], give 1 dose of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, surveyor observation, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers, Resident ID #34. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Low Air Loss System Policy and Procedure states in part, The purpose of the Low Air mattress is to provide therapeutic benefits to the resident at risk for or suffering from pressure ulcers while optimizing comfort . Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in November of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pressure ulcer of the sacral (the large, triangular bone at the base of the spine) region and pain. Review of a Wound Evaluation and Summary report dated 4/1/2025 revealed, the resident has a stage III pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss potentially extending into the subcutaneous tissue layer) to his/her coccyx…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications and biologicals were ordered by the prescriber for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Lorazepam (a medication prescribed for anxiety) administration, Resident ID #30. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to remove extra fluid and waste when kidneys fail to function effectively), end stage renal disease, and anemia (lack of enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body's tissues). Review of a physician order revealed Lorazepam 1 milligram (MG) once a day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, prior to dialysis. Review of the March 2025 Medication Administration Record failed to reveal evidence that the Lorazepam was administered, on the following dates: - 3/7/2025 - 3/10/2025 - 3/12/2025 - 3/14/2025 During a surveyor interview on 4/2/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM, with Registered Nurse, Staff B, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-30 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the Medical Director failed to implement a resident care policy to coordinate care for residents related to the transcription and implementation of orders by providers. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility provided document titled Medical Director Agreement revealed in part, .The Medical Director's responsibilities include .Directing and coordinating medical care in the organization .participating in establishing policies, procedures, and guidelines to ensure adequate,comprehensive services .participating in training programs as needed .Consulting with the administrator and Education Director about the organization's ability to meet the resident's needs . This document was signed by the Medical Director on 7/1/2023. Record review of the facility policy titled, Obtaining Physician Orders-Policy and Procedure revealed in part, To ensure orders are accurately completed and put in Matrix for completion .The nurse will receive verbal order from MD [Medical Doctor] or NP [Nurse Practitioner] and will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment relative to 4 of 4 kitchenettes observed. Findings are as follows: During a surveyor observation on 4/22/2024 at 9:28 AM of the 1st floor, [NAME] Point unit kitchenette, revealed a toaster oven with a buildup of food debris in the bottom of the toaster oven. During a surveyor observation on 4/22/2024 at 9:37 AM of the 2nd floor, Cold Spring Place kitchenette, revealed the following: - a freezer with an accumulation of brown debris and a pooling of a dry sticky red substance - a refrigerator with a pooling of a red colored sticky substance in the bottom - a toaster oven with a buildup of food debris in the bottom During a surveyor observation on 4/22/2024 at 9:59 AM of the 2nd floor, Park Square unit kitchenette, revealed the following: - a countertop with an accumulation of a brown sticky substance - a microwave with the top of the inside with an accumulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for anticoagulation therapy, relative to monitoring for bleeding (anticoagulant side effects), Resident ID #s 48, 62, and 118. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled, ANTICOAGULATION/ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY MONITORING reveals in part, .Purpose To ensure appropriate anticoagulant/antithrombotic dosing and to reduce the likelihood of resident harm associated with the use of anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy .PROCEDURE .15. Continue to monitor resident for overt/covert signs of bleeding. The most serious risks associated with oral anticoagulant therapy is hemorrhage in any tissue or organ. Suspected or overt abnormal bleeding ( .appearance of blood in stools, urine .petechiae [non-blanchable small spot that indicated bleeding under the skin], excessive bruising or persistent oozing from superficial injuries),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality regarding not following the facility's emergency cart equipment procedure for 4 out of 4 emergency carts observed and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to psychiatric consultant orders, Resident ID # 86. Findings are as follows: 1) Record review of the facility's policy titled, Emergency Cart Equipment revealed in part, .Every unit is equipped with an emergency (crash cart). It is located behind the nurse's station. The emergency cart contains the following: Suction machine 2 oxygen connection tubing's 2 suction catheters 1 bottle of normal saline 1 medium airway Gloves 1 each oxygen cannula, mask and non-rebreather 1 ambu bag [self-inflating bag, is a hand-held device commonly used to provide positive pressure ventilation to patients who are not breathing or not breathing adequately] Gowns Infection Control Pack Carry-all containing gloves, 4x4's in zip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the irregularities identified by the Clinical Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (RR) were acted upon for 1 of 1 resident reviewed related to phenytoin (a medication that is used to control seizures) , Resident ID #118. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #118 was re-admitted to the facility in April of 2015 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, vascular dementia and epilepsy. Record review of the document titled [Pharmacy] Consultation Report dated 2/27/2024, revealed a recommendation to monitor phenytoin trough concentration (indicates drug levels in an individual's body) on the next convenient lab day. Further review of this document revealed the resident .does not have a trough concentration documented in the medical record within the previous 6 months. Phenytoin has a narrow therapeutic index and requires close monitoring to help prevent adverse events. Further record review revealed the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 2 of 2 closed records reviewed, Resident ID #s 118 and 119. Findings are as follows: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident ID #118 was last admitted to the facility in April of 2015 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypertensive heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review revealed that the resident expired at the facility on [DATE]. Record review of a progress note dated [DATE] at 5:50 PM revealed, that on [DATE] the resident was observed with labored breathing with use of accessory abdominal muscles, his/her abdomen was grossly distended, expiratory wheezing, and verbalized general discomfort. Further review revealed that a STAT (as soon as possible) CXR (chest x-ray) was ordered on [DATE]. Record review of the completed chest x-ray dated [DATE] at 1:44 PM revealed the following: -moderate congestive heart failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for acute changes in a resident's condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, relative to a death in the facility, Resident ID #118. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled Monitoring for Acute Changes in Condition Policy & Procedure states in part, .To ensure that resident receives prompt care and treatment when overall condition deviates from baseline. To identify and treat subtle changes in condition before they develop or exacerbate into life altering changes .monitor for temperature changes .pulse rate .greater than 100, with symptoms such as .dyspnea [shortness of breath] .respirations .pain .change in level of consciousness .lethargy .unresponsiveness .weakness .significant Lab findings .Protocol prior to sending resident to ER [emergency room] ensure MD [Medical Doctor] or NP [Nurse Practitioner] is notified .have information readily available when calling ER and NP . Closed record review revealed Resident ID…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 3 residents reviewed with a suprapubic catheter (a device inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine), Resident ID #s 78 and 115. Findings are as follows: According to Taylor's Textbook of Fundamentals of Nursing, 9th Edition, pages 1368 states in part, Caring for patients with an indwelling catheter .The following is important nursing measures used to care for patients with an indwelling catheter .Note the volume and character of urine .Note and record the amount of urine on the patients .record every 8 hours .Empty the urine into a graduated container that is calibrated accurately for correct determination of output . According to a Cleveland Clinic document titled Suprapubic Catheter states, .How long does a suprapubic catheter stay in .If you need to use a suprapubic catheter long-term, you should change it at least every four weeks . Record review of the facility provided document titled Foley Catheter Care revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are fed by a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed relative to a gastrostomy tube (often called a G tube, which is a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine) Resident ID #51. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy titled, Administration of G-Tube Feeding Policy & Procedure states in part, .To safely administer tube feeding according to physician orders .Be sure HOB [Head of Bed] is elevated at 30 degrees or more and maintained at all times when receiving feedings . Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in January of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, adult failure to thrive and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of a care plan dated 1/17/2024 revealed the resident has a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. A PEG tube is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety as identified in the plan of care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a change in condition, Resident ID #118. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operation Manual Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/3/2023, which states in part, .To assure that all nursing staff possess the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being .'Competency' is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully . Record review of the facility provided document titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property relative to narcotic medications for 4 of 4 units reviewed, including 13 of 24 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s: 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24, and 25. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/21/2023 alleges in part that a resident did not receive his/her medication while at the facility for over 24 hours. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation Policy, states in part, .Another example of misappropriation of resident property is the diversion of a residents medication(s) . Review of a facility policy last updated on 9/2009 titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION SAFETY PROGRAM, states in part, .ADMINISTRATION .[facility] will prepare a dose of identified medication to the resident for whom it was ordered . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was readmitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 medication storage rooms observed and 4 of 4 units observed. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/21/2023 alleges in part that a resident did not receive his/her medication while at the facility for over 24 hours. Review of a facility policy last updated on 9/2009 titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION SAFETY PROGRAM, states in part, .DISCONTINUED MEDICATIONS Discontinued medications are removed [from] the medication cart/room . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #26 was readmitted to the facility in June of 2023 with a diagnosis that includes, but is not limited to, chronic respiratory failure. Additionally, s/he was discharged from the facility on 6/7/2023. Review of a physician's order dated 6/2/2023 and discontinued on 6/7/2023, revealed to give Ativan Intensol (liquid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 5 residents reviewed, relative to seizures, Resident ID #s 3, 4, and 5. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/18/2023, revealed Resident ID #3 had sustained a fall from a suspected seizure resulting in a hospital admission with a fractured right hip. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was originally admitted to the facility in April of 2022 and readmitted in September of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, other seizures, protein-calorie malnutrition, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Record review revealed on 6/22/2023, the resident sustained a fall and a 6-minute seizure resulting in pain to his/her left arm and bruising to his/her left knee and side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEZZELLI, PETER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 08/03/2021 |
| BROOKS-MANCINI, ROBBIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415041. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.