No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Health Care Center

1 Bishop Gadsden Way, Charleston, SC 29412 · Non profit - Corporation · 41 certified beds · (843) 762-3300 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
717 Folly Rd Ste 204 · (843) 608-0158 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
907 Folly Rd · (843) 795-5452 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.5 mi
865 Folly Road
Park
871 Riverland Dr · (843) 795-4386 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1872 Camp Rd · (843) 795-1623

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%78.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%13.9%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 450 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.85U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.47hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 245 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.85 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.1%CMS range 60.8–69.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.8–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.3–7.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.721.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.24
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.05
RN hoursweekends
33.9%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 26.0 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.24 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.59 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.32 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-25)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-20)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program by failing to monitor COVID 19 screening process logs to ensure accurate and within normal limit temperature measurements of 97 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 99.5 degrees F. Specifically, all residents, staff members, vendors, and visitors entering the facility campus were checked for an increase in temperature over 99.5 F. and symptoms of COVID 19. Review of the temperature measurements recorded on the screening process logs revealed there were temperature measurements out of normal range that could indicate a symptom of COVID 19 illness. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of exposure and/or contracting the COVID 19 virus or its variants. On 02/14/22 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator was provided a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and notified that the failure to ensure the infection control and prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to individualize comprehensive plans for urinary catheter bulb size for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident (R)11 and R123). This failure could place the residents at risk for discomfort and/or pain. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Physician Orders, with a revision date of October 2024, documented: 1. Policy It is the policy of [NAME] to obtain, document, and implement physician (or other licensed practitioner) orders in accordance with federal and state regulations, facility protocols, and standards of clinical practice. It is the policy of [NAME]'s SNF [skilled nursing facility] to review charts for any changes in Physician Orders. This will be done by the charge nurse every shift using the 24-hour alerts or 'Display New Orders' feature. 2. Procedure Order Documentation All orders must be documented in the resident's medical record, either electronically or in written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of facility policy and clinical records, the facility failed to monitor and/or document the use of a wander guard device according to standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident (Resident (R)3), and toprovide care and services consistent with professional standards for the management of pain related to a resident's frequent request for an opioid pain medication prescribed as needed (PRN) and or to ensure the consistent administration of pain medication for one (1) of two (2) residents (R4) sampled for pain. Findings include: 1.) A review of facility policy titled, Wander Management System, reviewed September 2024, revealed 1. Policy- A wander management system will be used for those residents/patients who are assessed to be an elevated risk to wander or elope. 2. Procedure 1. A tag will be assigned to each resident/patient who qualifies for increased monitoring, per wrist band if ambulatory or to wheelchair if unable to ambulate. 2. The system function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy prescribed for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident (Resident (R)14). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that R14 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Acute Pulmonary Manifestations Due to Radiation, Pneumonia, and Influenza. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen therapy. A review of the R14's Care Plan revealed a focused area for oxygen therapy, date initiated April 8, 2025, with interventions to include give medications as ordered by physician, monitor for signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and report to Medical Doctor (MD) as needed, and oxygen settings via nasal cannula (NC) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchens were maintained and operated in a safe manner to minimize the chances for potential spread of foodborne illness to all 21 residents in the facility. Failures included not storing food properly, handling ready to eat foods with gloves that had been in contact with potentially contaminated surfaces, failure to air dry pans and food containers before storage, and failure to ensure employee hair restraint while in the kitchens. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storing Staples, revised September 2016, revealed: .2. Procedure.2.1 All dry staples food items are stored in the dry storage area. Certain food items are stored off the floor on clean racks for ventilation and cleaning purposes. 2.2 Other staple items are stored in containers to be protected from splashes and other contamination. 2.3 Food items are rotated frequently. New stock is stored behind older stock to prevent deterioration and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent) based on medication pass observations for 1 of 3 residents. There were two medication administration errors resulting in an error rate of 7.67%. related to medication administration to Resident (R)224 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Findings include: During observation of Medication Administration on 03/18/24 at approximately 4:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 stated she was going to give Azelastine Nasal Spray to R224 and took a pharmacy labeled dispensing vial for R224 from the medication cart which had been labeled by pharmacy as Azelastine Nasal Spray for R224. RN1 then removed a container of Fluticasone Nasal Spray from the pharmacy labeled Azelastine vial. After punching other medications for R224 from medicine cards, she started toward the resident's room when the Surveyor stopped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0841 — isolated
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, manufacturer' guidelines and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director worked with the facility to completely assess 1 of 5 residents (Resident (R)75) for unnecessary medications. Specifically, an antipsychotic and psychoactive medication was used by the facility without an attempted gradual dose reduction (GDR), proper medical rationale or proper indication for use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Guideline revised March 2022 revealed, The Medical Director will act in an administrative and supervisory capacity by A. Contributing to the establishment of the Medical Policies in to the establishment of the Medical Policies B. Supervising the medical care given C. Ensuring that the medical policies are carried out D. Participating in the Quality Improvement Program to identify areas of improvement of patient care E. Approving medical care procedures as set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, interview and facility Departmental Procedure, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from active storage in 1 of 1 medications rooms. The findings include: On 2/14/22 at approximately 10:38 AM, inspection of the medication room refrigerator revealed one opened vial of Tuberculin, Purified Protein Diluted, Diluted, Aplisol by Par Pharmaceuticals 5 TU (test units)/0.1 ml (milliliter) 1ml (10 tests) approximately 1/4 full, dated as opened by the facility on 1/9/22. This medication was labeled by the manufacturer Once entered, vial should be discarded after 30 days and the manufacturer package insert states Vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency. The Departmental Procedure, revised October 2021, states under 2.3 Expired or discontinued medication shall not be stored with current medications. On 2/14/22 at approximately 10:48 AM, these findings were confirmed by Registered Nurse 1 and on 2/17/22 at approximately 9:05 AM, the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility Departmental Procedure, Food Storage in Country Kitchen Refrigerator, the facility failed to ensure an expired item was removed from the reach in cooler and failed to ensure open items in the cooler, freezer and the dry storage were labeled with an open date and resealed. The facility further failed to ensure food splatter was removed from the microwave in the Bistro and failed to ensure a covered trash receptacle was provided at the hand washing sink in the Bistro. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 34 residents eating foods prepared and stored in the Bistro. The findings included: An observation on 2/24/22 at 10:40 AM during initial tour of the Bistro revealed the following: Food splatter in the top of the microwave. A covered trash receptacle not provided at the hand washing sink in the Bistro. A small carton of milk in the reach in cooler with an expired date of 2/12/22. A tub of mixed fruit opened and not labeled with an open date. An open bag of 2 frozen hamburger patties in the reach in freezer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview, review of the manufacturer's guidelines for medication use, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents (Resident (R) R10) reviewed for unnecessary medication use did not receive psychoactive medication without a clinical risk versus benefit assessment and analysis, appropriate indication for use of the medication, attempting gradual dose reductions, identifying and routinely monitoring specific target behavior, and developing and implementing resident specific non-pharmacological interventions. This deficient practice had the potential for serious harm and/or death for all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Guidelines dated May 2021, revealed the facility was to ensure that .Residents who have not used psychotropic medications would not be prescribed psychotropic medications unless the medication was necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ADAMS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BALDWIN, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
CARTER, HEYWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
COOK, JONNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HILL, JOANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
JONES, GREGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KELLEY, MELINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KELLY, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
MACK, ANGELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MAYBANK, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SMITH, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
WOODLIFF-STANLEY, RUTHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
HUSSAIN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
KERRISON, LYNNE LIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ROBERTS, EVANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
ROOP, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
TIPTON, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$51.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-29.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 17%Other / private 83%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$2,305per resident / day
operating cost
$70,085per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,781per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in South Carolina
$9,034/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,612/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425411. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next