Retreat at Wellmore of Daniel Island

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 247 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, manufacturers' recommendations, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that food items were stored, prepared, distributed, and or served in accordance with professional standards of practice in one of one main kitchen and four of four satellite kitchenettes. 2. Ensure that staff adequately monitored and documented the sanitation levels of all facility dishwasher machines. Specifically, on 03/18/26, the facility was made aware of concerns with the main kitchen's dishwasher following a service repair by Ecolab and continued to prepare and serve meals using dishware that was not properly sanitized in five of five dishwashers reviewed.On 04/16/26 at 4:20 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 04/16/26 at 4:20 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, video footage and interviews, the facility failed to prevent accidents/hazards for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, on 8/30/25, Resident (R)1 had a successful elopement from the facility. R1 was placed at an increased risk of being struck by a vehicle and/or suffering a heat related and inclement illness.On 09/11/25 at 2:22 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.On 09/11/25 at 2:22 PM, the Executive Director (ED) was notified that the failure to protect R1 from having a successful elopement from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689.On 09/11/25 at 2:22 PM, the survey team provided the Executive Director with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 8/30/25. The IJ was related to S483.25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, review of the facility policy and South Carolina Board of Nursing regulations, the facility failed to ensure that no significant medication errors occurred for 1 (Resident (R) 45) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. (Cross reference F550, F759 and F880.)Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medication, revised 2019 states Medications are administered with prescriber order . Review of the facility policy titled, Central Venous Catheter Flushing and Locking revised June 2025 states The purposes of this procedure are to maintain patency of central venous catheters/access devices (CVADS), prevent mixing of incompatible medications and solutions, and ensure entire dose of solution or medication is administered into the venous system. and Verify with State Nurses Practice act the scope of practice for RNs (Registered Nurses) and LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses regarding this procedure. Review of the South Carolina Board of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the prescribed diets during two lunch meals for Resident (R) 33. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled, Tray Identification, with a revised date of 04/07, revealed, 2. The Food Services Manager will check trays for correct diets before the food carts are transported to their designated areas. 3. Nursing staff shall check each food tray for the correct diet before serving the residents.Review of R33's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), cerebellar stroke syndrome, dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of R33's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Review Date (ARD) of 04/06/26 revealed R33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07/15, which indicated R33 had severe cognitive deficit. R33 needed setup…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that privacy was maintained while intravenous medications were being administered to 1 (Resident (R) 45) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. (Cross reference F759, F760 and F880.)Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dignity revised February 2022, states Resident are treated with dignity and respect at all times. No policy on Privacy was obtained during the survey process. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R45 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of septicemia and bacteremia and had been placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 04/14/26 at approximately 10:40 AM, during medication pass observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated LPN2 was going to help him administer Rocephin [an antibiotic] to R45 through a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line, because he had not given medications this way before. On 04/14/2026 at approximately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered pursuant to physician orders for 1 (Resident (R) 45) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. The medication error rate was 8 percent. (Cross reference F550, F760 and F880.)Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medication, revised 2019 states Medications are administered with prescriber order . Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated R45 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of septicemia and bacteremia and had been placed on enhanced barrier precautions. On 04/14/26 at approximately 10:40 AM, during medication pass observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated LPN2, was going to help him administer Rocephin [an antibiotic] to R45 through a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line because he had not given medications this way before. On 04/14/26 at approximately 10:48 AM, LPN1 and LPN2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and review of manufacturer labeling, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored in 1 of 4 treatment carts.Findings Include: During an observation on 04/15/26 at approximately 11:32 AM, the [NAME] treatment cart contained one opened container of [NAME] Normal Saline 0.9 percent (0.9%), 100 milliliters (100 mL). The container was dated by the facility as opened on 04/10/2026. The manufacturer's labeling on the container stated Do Not Reuse and Contents STERILE in unopened.package. During a follow-up interview on 04/15/26 at approximately 11:37 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse 3 (LPN 3) inspected the [NAME] Normal Saline container, read the manufacturer's labeling, and stated that it should have been discarded after use rather than being returned to the treatment cart.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed for 1 (Resident (R) 45) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. (Cross reference F550, F759 and F760). Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last revised August 2022, states, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. 3. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include: . g. device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, etc.) 5. EBPs are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure items in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage were properly sealed, labeled, and dated. The facility also failed to discard expired items in dry storage. These failures had the potential to affect all 51 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dating for Food Storage revealed, For labeling, dating items requires special attention. All foods that require time and temperature control (TCS) should be labeled with the following: Common name of the food. Date the food was made. Use by date. The following observations were confirmed on 03/31/25 at 11:00 AM with the Director of Diet (DD) and the Executive Chef (EC): 1. The walk-in cooler had the following: 4 quart clear container labeled Noodles for soup dated 3/31, with no label. (Only Date). The container was not covered. 4 quart clear container labeled Apricot Glaze with no date. 4 quart clear container labeled Strawberry Sauce dated 3/29, with no label. (Only Date). 2 quart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Staff practiced proper hand hygiene during meal tray preparation and 2. Prepared food was being held at regulatory temperatures on the serving line for hot and cold foods, in 2 of 4 satellite kitchens. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene Sanitary Practices, with a revision date of November 2022 states, Food and nutrition services employees follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. 6. Employees must wash their hands: g. during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks. 9. Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used. Gloves are removed, hands are washed and gloves are replaced . Review of the facility policy titled, Food Preparation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, facility Registered Nurse (RN) coverage postings, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post RN coverage on daily staffing posted for March 2024 to the current date in April. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, (revised August 2022) revealed: The information required on the form shall include the following: f. Type (RN, LPN, LVN, or CNA) and category (licensed or non-licensed) of nursing staff working during that shift who are paid by the facility (including contract staff); g. The actual time worked during that shift for each category and type of nursing staff. Review of the facility staff postings on the skilled units for March 2024 to current date in April revealed that 8-hour RN coverage was not posted. On 04/17/24 at approximately 10:08 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the reason for not posting RN 8-hour coverage is because their current system does not delineate between RN and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) hours on daily posting logs. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication error rate was 7.69 percent for 2 out of 26 opportunities for error. Specifically medications for Resident (R)8 that were clearly labeled as, Do Not Crush or Chew, were crushed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2 and administered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, under Policy Statement, reads, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescribers orders, including any required time frame. 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 31. Each nurses' station has a current Physician's Desk Reference (PDR) and/or other medication reference, as well as a copy of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$8,428 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,428 — penalty dated 2025-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $945K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC