Rehab Center of Cheraw
1150 State Road, Cheraw, SC 29520 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 104 certified beds · (843) 537-2060 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- the CMS record shows $64,075 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-06)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.5% | 11.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.3% | 1.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.1% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.3% | 12.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.8% | 21.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.8% | 90.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.4% | 16.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.0% | 15.3% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 45.1% | 78.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.8% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.93 | 2.04 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.16 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.9%CMS range 29.0–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.7–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.2%CMS range 5.6–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident (R)248, received a therapeutic diet consistent with the resident's clinical condition and the recommendations of the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP). Specifically, the facility did not implement a recommended mechanical soft diet for R248, with dysphagia and documented swallowing difficulties. As a result, the resident continued to receive regular textured food resulting in the resident suffering from asphyxiation and expiring in the facility. On 05/04/25 at 3:26 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has cause or was likely to cause serious harm, serious impairment or death. On 05/05/25 at 4:19 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 03/05/25. The IJ was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to properly supervise 1 of 1 resident to prevent an elopement. Specifically, Resident (R)1 had a successful elopement from the facility on 09/22/23. On 10/03/23 at 4:55 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 10/03/23 at 4:59 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to properly supervise a resident, resulting in the resident successfully eloping from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 10/03/23 at 4:59 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 09/22/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 10/04/23 at 11:59 AM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 10/04/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of the facility's policy entitled, Activity Policies and Procedures, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the needs and interest of each resident for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for activities (Resident (R)18).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy entitled, Activity Policies and Procedures, stated, POLICY: Based on a comprehensive assessment, individualized care plan and the preferences of each resident, the Activity/Recreation Director and staff will provide an ongoing Activity/Recreation program to support resident personal choice of activities, facility-sponsored group, one to one activities, and independent activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, intellectual, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and community interaction.Purpose: To implement an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data, Resident Council interview responses, and a staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents as evidenced by low weekend staffing and missing Registered Nurse (RN) hours, affecting residents' timely access to care on a facility-wide basis. Findings include:Record review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025, Quarter Four (Q4) identified excessively low weekend staffing levels. The submitted PBJ data for Q4 is consistent with undocumented licensed Registered Nurse (RN) hours and required shifts for facilities with greater than 60 residents.Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated for 07/22/2025 identify an unresolved Nurse call out issue and reference late medication administration and unspecified disturbances.Record review of the Daily Licensed and Unlicensed Direct Care Staff hours between November 11, 2025 and December 30, 2025 reveal ten (10) instances of missing RN coverage and only document Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews and the facility's policy entitled, Nursing Policies and Procedures, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living, (ADLs) for Resident (R)18 related to hair and dental care, and for R90 related to nail care, for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Staff Education /Orientation Polices and Procedures, revised 1/12/2024, states performance criteria as follows: 5. Fills basin with warm water 6. Soak nails 7. Clean under nails with orange stick. Review of R90's face sheet revealed R90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to contracture of the left wrist, other pericardial effusion (non-inflammatory), other abnormal involuntary movements, other lack of coordination, muscle weakness (generalized), and flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side. Review of the Physician Orders written on 08/11/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)32's wound dressing was changed daily in accordance with physician orders. The resident's bandage had not been changed for five (5) days and was observed to be visibly soiled with dried blood. Findings include:R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral palsy, functional quadriplegia, psychosis, mild intellectual disability, and left hand contracture.R32 was assessed as having a 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm wound on the right upper arm.Review of Physician Orders revealed orders including, but not limited to: Wound R[right] Arm Upper: Clean the wound with wound cleanser or normal saline, pat dry, apply honey, and cover with a bordered gauze dressing (BGD) to be changed daily and as needed (PRN).Review of R32's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/07/2025 revealed R32 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility policy, medical records, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent for 2 out of 25 opportunities for error. The med error rate was 8 percent. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Management Program, under Policy states,The facility implements a Medication Management Program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements.3. Licensed nurses will evaluate, assess, monitor, document and report the effectiveness of the medication regimen that includes all medications and supplements prescribed to treat illness, disease process, or enhance the patient's/resident's quality of life. Review of the facility policy titled, Staff Education/Orientation Policies and Procedures, under the competency, Medication Administration - Insulin Pen, states under the Performance Criteria, Priming the Pen, 1. Remove the outer needle cap and dial 2 units. 2. Points the pen up and presses the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for Resident (R)50, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 failed to correctly prime an insulin pen before administering a dose of insulin for 1 of 1 residents observed, receiving insulin via a pen during med pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Staff Education/Orientation Policies and Procedures, under the competency, Medication Administration - Insulin Pen, states under the Performance Criteria, Priming the Pen, 1. Remove the outer needle cap and dial 2 units. 2. Points the pen up and presses the plunger button to expel 2 units of insulin. 3. Repeats these steps as needed until a drop or stream of insulin appears at the needle tip. During a observation on 01/12/2026 at 11:25 AM, LPN1 placed a needle on a Degludec Insulin Pen, then held the pen in the downward position toward the trash can and pushed the dose button expelling the 2 units used to prime the pen in the trash can. LPN1 confirmed that he had held the insulin pen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in one (1) of two (2) medication storage rooms at safe and appropriate temperatures in accordance with facility policy and manufacturer recommendations.Findings include:Review of procedure number 10.A.1 of the facility policy titled Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures, last revised on 04/01/2022, revealed that facility staff are required to monitor and record refrigerator and freezer temperatures twice daily, with medication refrigerator temperatures maintained between 36-46 F (2-8 C). On 01/13/2026 at approximately 09:15 AM, review of medication storage areas was conducted. The facility was observed to have one medication storage room and two medication carts each located on the North and South wings. Review of the South Med Room refrigerator temperature logs revealed multiple documented dates with temperatures outside of the acceptable range.On 01/13/2026 at approximately 01:20 PM, the Mobile Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, record review, pharmacy delivery manifests, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident (Residents (R)6), reviewed for pharmacy services. Specifically, R6 missed six scheduled doses of a controlled pain medication (Oxycodone), over a three-day period. Finding Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Management Program last revised 01/15/25 revealed, The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements .Administering the Medication Pass . 15. If a medication is unavailable, contact the pharmacy and document accordingly. Notify physician for possible alternatives available in e-kits at time of discovery. Review of R6's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: pain, spondylosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evidenced by medication administration observations of Resident (R)1 and R18. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene/Handwashing dated 5/15/23 documented, Procedures: 1. Hand hygiene/hand washing is done: Before: A. Before patient/resident contact .After: .B. After patient/resident contact. C. After contact with a contaminated object or source where there is a concentration of microorganisms, such as, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, body fluids, blood or wounds .J. Contact with environmental surfaces in the immediate vicinity of patients/residents. Review of the facility policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 5/5/23 documented, .If the manufacturer doesn't specify how the device should be cleaned and disinfected, then it shouldn't be shared. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 3 residents was free from significant medication errors for 1 out of 30 days for the month April 2024. Resident (R)1 received Lyrica; 1 capsule by mouth, 1 time a day and Norco 325 milligrams (mg); 1 tablet, 2 times a day. R1's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form revealed medication was pulled and reported not administered, which heightened the likelihood of a decline in medical conditions. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Medication Management Program with a revision date of 05/05/23 documented under Administering Medication Pass (8) The authorized staff member or licensed nurse must identify the resident before administering any medication. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to;anxiety, dementia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease and heart failure. Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an elopement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement. Specifically, Resident (R)1 successfully eloped from the facility and was found down the street from the facility. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement with a revision date of 11/01/17, documented, Policy: . A prompt investigation and search will be conducted in a patient/resident is considered missing . Procedures: 11. Facilities Quality Assurance Committee investigates the incident and implements interventions to prevent reoccurrences. Document Requirements: Incident Report, Investigative Report, Nursing notes should reflect an accurate and detailed account of situation and outcome, Social Services notes need to address emotional assessment and interventions. Missing Patient/Resident Profile and Notification Record. Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$64,075 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-05-06
- $4,349 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
- $4,349 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
- $38,032 — penalty dated 2023-09-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-28 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/14/2015 |
| VILLAFRANCA, GRACE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/09/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $492K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in SC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425302. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.