C M Tucker Jr Nursing Care Center Roddey Pavilio

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 308 beds and averages 83.7 residents a day — about 27% occupied, or roughly 224 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.97 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.99 to 1.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and a review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow proper infection control protocol in 3 of 3 laundry rooms. Specifically, there was a lack of separation between the clean and soiled laundry room. Laundry staff did not adhere to manufacturer guidelines regarding the use of detergents and sanitizers. Additionally, heavily soiled clothing items were being rinsed out in areas such as resident bathroom toilets/sinks or the sinks in shared shower rooms. This failure had the potential to spread bacteria, viruses, and fungal infections. On 04/18/25 at approximately 11:45 AM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified that the failure to follow infection control standards regarding laundry services constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F880. On 04/18/25 at approximately 11:45 AM, the survey team presented the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility that IJ existed as of 02/17/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.80 - Infection Control. On 04/18/25, the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from physical abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)2. On 03/18/24 at 10:25 AM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing were notified that the failure to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from physical abuse constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F600. On 03/18/24 at 10:25 AM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 12/30/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.12 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. On 03/18/24 at 12:27 PM, the facility presented an acceptable plan of removal of the IJ. On 03/18/24 at 12:57 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth good faith attempts to address the non-compliance, considering the IJ at Past Non-Compliance as of 01/05/24. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent the elopement of 1 of 7 residents reviewed. Resident (R) #7 eloped from the facility on 07/02/2023 at approximately 6:16 PM. This situation placed the resident at increased risk for severe harm and / or death. R7 was outside of a safe area without facility awareness, supervision, or permission, placing her increased risk of heat exposure, dehydration and / or other medical complications, or being struck by a motor vehicle. On 09/18/23 at 1:58 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified that Resident (R)7's successful elopement from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 09/18/23 at 1:58 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator and the DON with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 07/02/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 09/18/23 at 12:41 PM, the facility presented an acceptable plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)50 with sufficient daily fluid intake, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hydration. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Intake and Output last revised October 2023 revealed, To maintain an accurate record of the resident's fluid intake and output. Documentation of intake and output are indicated when there is a change in the resident's intake or output, when intravenous fluid are being administered, or when a resident is on a fluid restriction. Procedure includes identify resident, use both resident's identification bracelet and resident photograph on unit. Record all fluid intake, a cup of ice is equal to approximately mL (milliliter) of fluid, record all intake, every shift. Review of R50's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: schizophrenia, congestive heart failure, and dementia with agitation. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Amended 1/9/25 Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency for 1 (Resident (R)4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Protection From Harm Program, revised 11/2024, indicated the facility will report all incidents of alleged or substantiated abuse to the proper government agencies as outlined by state, federal and local regulations governing the operation of a long-term nursing care facility. The policy revealed DHEC [Department of Health and Environmental Control] requires the reporting of Resident-to-Resident abuse, altercations involving physical contact between two residents. A Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted R3 on 03/21/2023. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, wandering, and schizophrenia. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, staff were required to keep Resident #3 within line of sight when the resident was out of their room. On 11/15/2024 at approximately 7:25 PM, staff failed to supervise Resident #3 and found the resident in Resident #4's room. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Special Treatment Modalities and Observation Levels effective 09/2024, revealed, This directive defines the process for administering care to resident populations who because of their behavior/condition, require more intensive monitoring within the facility. It is the policy of [the facility] to provide an appropriate level of supervision for those residents who are at significant risk of harm to self and/or others and/or who may create serious disruption in the environment. The policy revealed, Constant Observation-Line of Sight (COLS): Occurs when an individual staff member may be responsible for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$59,779 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $42,759 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-03-18
• $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-09-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC