Veteran Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly -0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · G2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the significant worsening of a pressure area and the development of a Stage III (3) pressure area for one (1) Resident (R21) out of 19 sampled residents, who developed in house pressure areas. R21's mattress malfunctioned which led to the increase in size in one (1) pressure ulcer and the development of another. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Intervention and Prevention, dated 12/2023, documented, The following is meant to be a guideline and is intended to assist in the decision-making process when determining appropriate treatment and prevention according to the underlying etiology of the alteration in skin integrity, the condition of the wound, and the overall condition of the entire resident. Prevention and Intervention: General Guidelines: 1. Identify residents being At Risk for alterations in skin integrity . 2. Assure proper Tissue Load Management. a. Reposition resident when in bed or in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-10-11 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the Medical Provider of urinalysis results ordered on 06/25/24 and 07/2/24, resulting in subsequent hospitalization of a Resident (R)12 with a Urinary Tract Infection. This deficient practice affected one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters from a total of 19 residents sampled. Findings include: Review of R12's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 04/20/23. R12's primary medical diagnosis was Incomplete Paraplegia. His/her secondary medical diagnoses included Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. Review of R12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/28/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R12's cognition was intact. The assessment also identified the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. During an observation on 10/10/24 at 12:34 PM, R12 was observed in his/her wheelchair in the common area of the 6B unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, facility staff failed to implement the corrective actions as indicated in the facility's investigative report for an allegation of abuse. This deficient practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse from a total of 19 sampled residents. (Resident (R)48). Findings include: Cross Reference to F607 - Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies Review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse Investigation documented, An immediate investigation is warranted when abuse is suspected or reported, and a thorough investigative result will be documented. Step 11 of the policy directed staff to analyze the occurrence and implement changes to prevent further occurrences. Review of R48's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/17/23. R48's primary medical diagnosis was Congestive Heart Failure. Review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating R48's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (2) of 19 sampled residents by failing to: 1) Assess the placement of a gastrostomy (g-tube) tube prior to the administration of medications for one (1) of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R)36) and 2) Develop and implement interventions for episodes of hypoglycemia for residents with Diabetes for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications from a total of 19 sampled residents. (R2) Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan (Comprehensive) dated 6/2019 revealed, Purpose: To develop an interdisciplinary resident centered comprehensive care plan to meet the individual needs of each resident. Procedure: . 2. The comprehensive care plan has been designed to: a. Identify care needs that include resident's strengths, history, and preferences . d. Include individualized approaches to meet resident's goals. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications of enteral feeding for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident. Resident (R)36 received medications through a gastrostomy tube (g-tube), however, the g-tube was not aspirated for residual contents, or verified by auscultation for the proper placement prior to administration of the medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, dated 6/2024, and titled, Gastrostomy Tube Medication Administration, stated, Purpose: To provide medications via gastrostomy tube. Procedure: . 2. Prepare ordered medications . b. Crush pills and mix with 10-30cc [centimeters] water in one (1) medication cup . 4. Clean the bell of stethoscope with an alcohol wipe . 14. Auscultate for bowel sounds in all 4 [four] quadrants via stethoscope. 15. Check placement by placing stethoscope to abdomen and inject 10-15cc air in tubing 16. Aspirate residual (Do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to address indications of pain and did not treat pain appropriately for Resident (R)21, who experienced pain during dressing changes. This failed practice affected one (1) resident out of 19 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Management, revised on January 2023, documented Purpose: To ensure that the residents receive the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices, related to pain management Procedure: 1. The resident will be screened for the presence and level of pain upon admission, readmission, quarterly, with significant change in condition, and as indicated . 4. The risk for pain will be identified in the resident's care plan, to include history or current OUD [Opioid Use Disorder] and medication as ordered by physician. 5. Facility staff will observe for verbal and nonverbal indicators which may indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$41,108 in federal fines across 9 penalties.

• $4,256 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
• $4,256 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $3,228 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $10,489 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC