Sedgewood Manor Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 29.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Resident (R)1, R2, R3, R8 and R9, 5 of 5 rooms reviewed for call light placement.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response with a copyright date of 2025 states, The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines5. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the residents and secured, as needed.Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including but not limited to muscle weakness (generalized), unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, dementia, and essential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly label and discard expired food items in 1 of 1 main kitchen and 1 of 1 resident nourishment refrigerator. This failure to follow proper food storage protocols presents a potential risk to the health and safety of the 33 residents who consume food prepared in the facility's kitchen.Review of an undated facility policy titled Labeling, Dating, Rotating Foods revealed the following: Food must be rotated while in storage to maintain quality and limit the growth of pathogens. Food items must be rotated so the items with the earliest use-by or expiration dates are used before those listed with later dates. The first in, first out method (FIFO) is used to rotate foods refrigerated, frozen, and/or dry goods so that items dated earlier are used first. Identify food's use-by or expiration date. Identifiers include item name, date entering facility, and date of manufacturer expiration. Dispose of food on the date of expiration. Any food taken out of the original container must have a delivery…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was immediately reported to the abuse coordinator for 1 of 3 residents, Resident (R) 31 reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential to expose the victim to ongoing harm and allow harmful behavior to continue without intervention.Review of the undated facility policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation revealed, It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations withing prescribed timeframes.Review of R31's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for Resident (R4), 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. Specifically, staff failed to provide showers and nail care for R4, who was dependent on staff for assistance with ADLs.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revealed, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Review of R4's Face Sheet revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of the right middle cerebral artery, morbid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility policy, record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident-centered program designed to meet the resident's interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences in order to promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities, Resident (R)35.Review of an undated facility policy titled, Activities states, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. Activities may be conducted in different ways: One-to-One Programs, Person Appropriate - activities relevant to the specific needs, interests,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow physician orders for changing oxygen tubing and nasal cannulas for 3 of 3 residents (R) R7, R32 and R42 reviewed for respiratory care. This failure has the potential for harm due to increased risk of infection. Review of the undated facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revealed, 5b. Change Oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. Review of R7's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD; a lung disease causing shortness of breath), chronic respiratory failure, generalized anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/25 showed she has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating she has no cognitive deficit. Her MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and employee record reviews, the facility failed to provide yearly performance evaluations for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), for 3 of 5 CNAs reviewed for yearly performance evaluations; CNA3, CNA4,and CNA5. Review of CNA3's employee record revealed she has a hire date of 04/20/23. She received her last performance review on 05/10/24. She received a rating of Excellent in all areas except one. Her 2025 performance review had not yet been completed as of 07/28/25. Review of CNA4's employee record revealed she has a hire date of 02/24/16. She received her last performance review on 02/28/24. She was rated Excellent and Good in all areas. When Surveyor initially asked for her file on 07/28/25, Human Resources (HR) revealed CNA4's 2025 review was not yet completed. Later in the day on 07/28/25, HR informed Surveyor CNA4's 2025 was completed. She was rated Good in all areas.Review of CNA5's employee record revealed she has a hire date of 04/25/24. When Surveyor initially asked for CNA5's employee record, HR revealed CNA5's 2025 review was not yet completed. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and Daily Nursing Hours sheet reviews, the facility failed to visibly post the Daily Nursing Hours sheets on a daily basis where residents, staff, and visitors could visibly access them. During an observation on 07/27/25 at 9:59 AM, the Daily Nursing Hours sheets were posted in one of two resident hallways outside the Director of Nursing (DON) office. The office was located within the facility and was not readily accessible to visitors as they entered the facility. The date on the sheet that was visible was 07/24/25. Under the Daily Nursing Hours sheet dated 07/24/25 was a Daily Nursing Hours sheet dated 07/21/25. During an interview with Regional Consultant on 07/27/25 at 4:30 PM, he revealed, We do not post the Daily Nursing Hours sheets in the front of the building. We have always posted these at the nurses' station. I do not know if the sheet would be visible to others that don't go to the nurses' station or past it if the resident's room is not down that hallway. He then agreed that all visitors would not actually see the Daily Nursing Hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% during medication administration for 2 of 25 opportunities for error; the error rate was 8 percent. Specifically, Resident (R) 30 did not receive two medications for which there were active physician orders, resulting in a medication omission error. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Medication Administration, states, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician.Observation of medication pass on 06/28/25 at 8:34 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 was observed preparing to administer medications to R30. R30 had active physician orders for the following medications: Calcitriol Oral Capsule 0.25 mcg, to be administered by mouth once daily at 9:00 AM for renal disease and Sensipar (Cinacalcet HCl) Oral Tablet 30 mg, to be administered by mouth once daily at 9:00 AM for renal disease. At the time of observation, LPN1 confirmed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to failed to provide appropriate assistive devices for 1 of 2 Residents (R) reviewed for food. Specifically, R22 did not receive an ordered cup with two handles and lid during meals. This failure has the potential for harm due the potential loss of independence with feeding self.Review of the undated policy titled, Use of Assistive Devices revealed, Assistive devices are tools, products, types of equipment, or technology that help individuals perform tasks and activities . Assistive devices include . g. Eating utensils. The policy also stated, The facility will provide assistive devices for residents who need them.Review of R22's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: anxiety, dementia and dysphagia (trouble swallowing).Review of R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/25/25 showed she has a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-29 for 85 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC