No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

L.M.C.- Extended Care

815 Old Cherokee Road, Lexington, SC 29072 · Non profit - Corporation · 352 certified beds · (803) 359-5181 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (803) 359-5181 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$30,021 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • the CMS record shows $30,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-03)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
448 Old Cherokee Rd · (803) 520-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
348 Columbia Ave · (803) 957-5969 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion1.6 mi
744 W Main St · (803) 359-9225 · Call to confirm hours
Park
804 Hendrix St, Lexington, SC 29072 · (888) 383-5032 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1205 Old Cherokee Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.6%11.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%3.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.8%12.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.3%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%90.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.9%16.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.2%15.3%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%78.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.2%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.482.041.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.091.841.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 363 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.3%CMS range 49.1–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 10.1–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 6.9–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.20
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
41.4%
Total nursing turnover
32.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 352 beds and averages 290.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident (R)1 received the medications intended for R6. R1 did not receive any of her prescribed medications. This resulted in R1 experiencing a drop in blood pressure which required hospitalization. On 09/26/23 at 2:00 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 09/26/23 at 2:00 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 09/17/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.45 - Pharmacy Services. On 09/26/23 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator and DON were notified that the failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for allegations of staff-to-resident abuse for 1 Resident (R)21 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility investigation did not include staff interviews from the unit where the resident resided.Review of a facility policy titled, Standard Policy/Procedure, approved 10/21/22, revealed the section titled, DHEC [Department of Health and Environmental Control] Certification and the facility Administrator shall be notified immediately but not later than 2 hours after alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source or misappropriation of resident property are made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.Review of R21's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R21 on 11/22/24. According toR21's Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of depression, cognitive communication deficit, transient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer Resident (R)4 for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II, after the resident received a new diagnosis of a severe mental illness, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR.Review of R4's Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted R4 on 09/30/2019. According to the Face Sheet, the R4 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, dated 07/30/21. Review of R4's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/04/25, revealed R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R4 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Review of R4's Care Plan, included a problem statement started 12/12/2023, that indicated the resident had diagnoses of a cardiovascular accident (CVA), bipolar disorder, anxiety, and dementia that required the use of psychotropic/psychoactive medications. Interventions directed staff to administer medications as ordered; approach the resident in a calm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)191's medical record included documentation they were offered the pneumonia vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations.Review of a facility policy titled, Immunization, dated 05/1123, specified, [Facility Name] will offer the pneumonia immunization at admission if there is no history of prior immunization; and immunize against pneumonia unless medically contraindicated or immunization is refused by the resident or the resident's legal representative. Review of R191's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R191on 02/23/24. According to R191's Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of R191's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/01/25, revealed R191had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R191's Continuity of Care Document,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to submit an initial report of an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the state survey agency within two hours for 1 Resident (R)21 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuseReview of a facility policy titled, Standard Policy/Procedure, approved 10/21/22, revealed the section titled, DHEC [Department of Health and Environmental Control] Certification and the facility Administrator shall be notified immediately but not later than 2 hours after alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source or misappropriation of resident property are made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. Review of R21's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R21 on 11/22/24. According toR21's Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of depression, cognitive communication deficit, transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, and malignant neoplasm of the left breast and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)3 was treated with respect and dignity when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2, used profanity in and/or around the resident's presence. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Elder Abuse, last revised 10/21/22, states: .All staff is expected to be in control of their own behavior, behave professionally and appropriately, and understand how to work with the nursing home population. Any substantiated incident will result in employee discipline, which may include termination from the job. Review of R3's Face Sheet revealed, R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: dementia, severe with agitation, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and disorientation. Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/24 revealed R3's Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a privacy bag was provided to Resident (R)178's catheter bag, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. The deficiency disregarded the resident's privacy, dignity, and respect and had the potential to cause psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standard Policy/Procedure with Subject: Catheterization of Female/Male with an approved by date of 07/13/12, revealed, Procedure- 4. Explain the procedure to the patient. Perform hand hygiene. Maintain the patient's privacy and dignity. Review of R178's Face Sheet revealed R178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, depression, chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, retention of urine, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with other forms of angina pectoris, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)73 and R96 had a physician's order for the code status of 2 of 5 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) with an approved by date of 09/08/23, revealed, Procedure: 1. On admission, the Social Worker will determine the desires of the resident and responsible party related to the DNR status. 2. The Social Worker/Speech Therapist will establish resident cognitive status by completing the BIMs tool. 3. If the resident or his/her legal representative wishes to initiate a DNR order, the Code Status form and Emergency Medical Services DNR order will be initiated. 4. If the resident is not considered their own responsible party and has a BIMS score of =<12, then the responsible party as well as two physician signatures are required to establish DNR status. 5. If the resident is considered competent and has a BIMS score of =>13 then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for Resident (R)73 for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Subject: Medication Guidelines with an approved by date of 04/25/23 revealed, Policy: Medications are given per physician's order to treat resident's acute and chronic illness. Handling of Non-Controlled Medication: 28. Residents may self-administer a medication based upon physician order, self-administration assessment completed by nurse and review and approval by the interdisciplinary team which determines appropriateness. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications revealed, A. Policy: The facility shall permit residents who are competent and physically able to self-administer their medications if the following conditions are met: 1. Self-administration of medications by residents is permitted only on the specific written orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to proper store and label respiratory equipment for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident (R)73, R99, R263. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Subject: Oxygen Therapy Protocol with an approved by date of 05/12/11, revealed, Protocol: 1. The Oxygen Protocol will be initiated on residents by a written order from the physician for any type of oxygen therapy . Routine Oxygen Administration and Documentation: .Documentation will be done by nursing on the Medication Administration Record . Review of R73s Face Sheet revealed R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of R73's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 06/05/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R73 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to label/store and ensure medications were not expired for 3 of 4 units observed for medication storage. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Medication Guidelines dated [DATE], revealed under the policy, Medication labels must be correct and legible, check medications for expiration dates and return to the pharmacy. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage dated 09/20, revealed under the policy, The temperature of the refrigerators containing medication shall be maintained between 36-46 degrees F. On [DATE] at 9:10 AM, an observation of [NAME] Place Unit Medication Room with Registered Nurse (RN)2 revealed the medication refrigerator checklist dated [DATE] had 5 days that the refrigerator temperature was not checked, they were blank. The blank dates were [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. RN2 confirmed the dates were blank. RN2 stated, I was off on some of these dates. I am the one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served meal trays under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of disease and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy dated 12/23/20, titled, Nursing Hand Hygiene: Staff and Residents revealed under the policy, Situations that require staff hygiene; before and after handling food, after performing your own personal hygiene, before and after assisting a resident with meals. Review of the facility policy dated 10/01/97, titled, Nursing Uniforms revealed under the policy, Hair of any length must be neatly trimmed, hair must not contaminate the work environment. During an observation on 06/18/24 at 12:07 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)5 was passing meal trays, on the lower number 200 hall. While CNA5 took trays from the food cart, her hair touched the tops of the items on each of the meal trays. This continued for all the meal trays CNA5 delivered to the rooms. CNA5 touched her hair after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)20 was free from verbal abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy dated 10/21/22 and titled Alleged Abuse/Incident of Unknown Origin/Accident-Injury Complaint Responsibilities/Obligation to Report revealed under the policy, Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Examples include threats of harm or saying things to frighten a resident. Review of the facility Customer Service Training, no date, titled, Excellent Customer Service Matters, Internal vs. External revealed under the training, Going above and beyond to ensure customers are happy and satisfied with their products and services. It involves being timely, pleasant, and efficient, and building strong relationships with customers. It also means exceeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for one resident (R)197 of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion out of the sample of 78 residents. The failure to apply splints to the resident's contractures has the potential for increased contractures and/or pain. Findings include: Review of R197's undated Face Sheet located in R197's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, indicated R197 was initially admitted to facility on 01/25/10 with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of persistent vegetative state, anoxic brain damage, and hand contractures. Review of R197's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in R197's EMR under the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/20/22, revealed R197's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not attempted due to resident is rarely/never understood. R197 is dependent for all activities of daily living (ADLs). R197, according to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$30,021 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $6,032 — penalty dated 2024-07-03
  • $23,989 — penalty dated 2023-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LEXINGTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/1989
CABALTICA, REX BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
GILL, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2018
HOFFMAN III, RONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$34.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 5%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$338per resident / day
operating cost
$10,267per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in South Carolina
$9,034/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,612/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425321. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next