Retreat at Wellmore of Lexington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 165 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 45.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)43 was free from significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that R43 received the correct medication order for Bupropion/Wellbutrin, which led to the resident being hospitalized . On 05/21/25 at 1:00 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 03/04/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Pharmacy Services. On 05/22/25 the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 05/22/25 the survey team, validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. The IJ is considered at Past Non-Compliance as of 03/13/25. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the Recertification and Complaint Survey, for non-compliance at F760, constituting substandard quality of care. Findings include: Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods that are stored in the refrigerator and dry storage were labeled and discarded after the manufacturer's expiration date. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a revised date of November 2022, reveals, Food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Dry Food Storage: 4. Dry foods that are stored in bins are removed from original packaging, labeled and dated. Such foods are rotated using a first in-first out system. Refrigerated/Frozen Storage: 7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated and monitored so they are used by their use-by date, frozen, or discarded. During an initial tour observation on 01/29/24 at 12:24PM, in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area revealed: 1. One unopened five-pound bag of Mozzarella cheese labeled with a received date of 12/29/23, had a manufactured expiration date of 11/29/23, which also contained mold. 2. A blue bucket that did not contain any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R) 34 and R195's, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), were properly cleaned and stored after each use. This failure has the potential to cause respiratory and other communicable infections/complications. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP Support, with a revised date of March 2015, states, 2. To improve arterial oxygenation (PaO2) in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive/obstructive lung disease. 3. To promote resident comfort and safety. Review of R34's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of R34's treatment orders revealed an order dated 01/11/24, which indicated, continuous positive airway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, interviews, and manufacturer package inserts, the facility failed to maintain clean medication carts for 2 of 7 med carts and failed to prevent expired and/or improper storage of medications in 2 of 4 med rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised [DATE], stated that the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated February 2023, stated that if the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. On [DATE] at approximately 1:08 PM inspection of the 100-hall south medication cart revealed sticky substances on bottles of Pro-stat and bottom of third (3rd) drawer on left side of cart. On [DATE] at approximately 1:13 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections related to influenza for one of one, Resident (R)1. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Influenza, Prevention and Control of Seasonal, revised March 2022 states, This facility follows current guidelines and recommendations for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza. Influenza Control, 6. Visits to residents on precautions for influenza are scheduled and controlled to allow for: a. screening visitors for symptoms of acute respiratory illness before entering the facility; and b. providing instruction before visitors enter residents' rooms, on hand hygiene, limiting surfaces touched, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) while in resident's room. Infection Precautions: 1. Contact and droplet precautions are implemented for residents with suspected or confirmed influenza for seven (7) days after illness onset or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the kitchen were labeled, dated, and not expired. These failures had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illness and infection to all facility residents. Findings include: Review of the Pye [NAME] Quality Control Checklist for Cleaning of Exhaust System dated 11/18/20, 3/3/21, 8/24/21, and a 01/31/22 email and on 1/17/22, cleaning was canceled and rescheduled for 3/28/22. During a review of the facility's policy and procedures the following was revealed: The Refrigerators and Freezers policy stated .#7 All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates . Received dates (dates of delivery) will be marked on cases and on individual items removed from cases for storage . Use by dates will be completed with expiration dates on all prepared food in refrigerators. Expiration dates on unopened food will be observed and use by dates indicated once food is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-02-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of the manufacturer's guidelines for medication use, and review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that three of five residents (Resident (R) R30, R41, and R42) reviewed for unnecessary medication use did not receive psychoactive medications without an appropriate assessment and indication for use, monitoring of adverse effects, attempting gradual dose reductions when appropriate, reducing or discontinuing as needed psychotropics past the 14 day criteria, identifying and routinely monitoring specific target behaviors, and developing and implementing resident specific non-pharmacological interventions. This deficient practice had the potential for serious harm and/or death for all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy dated April 2018 titled, Medication Utilization and Prescribing- Clinical Protocol stated Assessment and Recognition:2. As part of the overall review,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)19 and R42 were afforded the right to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings Include: The facility admitted R19 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety and legal blindness. Review on [DATE] at 1:22 PM of the medical record for R19 revealed no documentation to ensure R19 was afforded the right to formulate an Advance Directive. Further review on [DATE] at 1:25 PM of the medical record for R19 revealed no assessments and signatures of 2 physician's indicating that R19 was not able to make her own healthcare decisions. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:35 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed that R19 was not afforded the right to formulate her choices for an Advance Directive. Review on [DATE] at 9:14 AM of the facility policy titled, Advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for one of two residents (Resident (R) R42) reviewed for environment. Specifically, R42 had food crumbs, paper trash, and other particles on the floor. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: During initial tour of the facility on 01/31/22 at 12:43 PM, observation of food crumbs and paper trash were noted lying on the floor in R42's room. Observation on 02/01/22 at 8:54 AM , food crumbs and paper trash were observed on the floor in R42's room located in the same place as observed on the previous day. Observation on 02/02/22 at 8:59 AM, food crumbs and paper trash were observed on the floor in R42's room located in the same place as observed on the previous dates of 01/31/22 and 02/01/22. Observation on 02/02/22 at 8:59 AM, during a wound care observation with R42, it was noted the floor had a large amount of food crumbs and other non-identified dirt particles, a smashed brown food substance, a dried red liquid substance, gauze, and paper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents (R) R30 and R42), who were given mental health diagnoses and were not provided a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 2 evaluation to determine the need for individualized mental health treatment and support services. Specifically, R30 was admitted with diagnoses of depression and psychotic disorder and received antipsychotic medication with no PASARR level 2 referred. R42 was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia and was later given a diagnosis of schizophrenia disorder and was prescribed an antipsychotic medication with no PASARR level 2 referred. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, unnecessary medication/s, and at risk for not receiving appropriate mental health treatment and support/services needed. This had the potential to affect all residents with a mental health diagnosis. Findings Include: Review of the Review of the Diagnostic Criteria for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive care plan interventions for two residents (Resident (R) 30 and 41) of five reviewed for psychotropic medication care plan/s. These failures had the potential to affect all residents prescribed psychotropic medications with target behaviors by increasing the potential for harm due to the facility failing to implement nonpharmacological methods that were identified on the care plan with the usage of unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the admission Record, located on the Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; acute pulmonary edema, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, repeated falls, and anxiety disorder. Review of the EMR admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/14/22, revealed R41 was moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-05-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $939K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC