Mountainview Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 120.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement on 11/01/25 at approximately 6:00 AM. Specifically, R1 was located by staff outside the facility lying on the ground. R1 was dressed in bedtime clothing (pajamas and slippers). According to weather reports on 11/01/25 at 5:55 AM, the weather was 36 Degrees Fahrenheit (F).On 11/07/25 at 1:34 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator and Assistant Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 11/01/25. The IJ was related to 483.24 Quality of Care.On 11/07/25 at 4:12 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 11/07/25 at 5:00 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective action and determined that the facility put forth due diligence in addressing this non-compliance. The SA is considering this IJ at Past Non-Compliance (PNC) as of 11/05/25.An Extended Survey was conducted in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect the Resident's (R)1 current fall interventions for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revealed, 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and residents' conditions change. 12. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: and included, d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Management, dated 05/19/2024, revealed under the heading, C. Intervention included, g. Update the resident's care plan. Review of R1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted R1 on 03/12/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included but was not limited to diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with early onset,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a sheet was not applied in a manner that flattened the perimeter defined mattress cover which created the potential for accidents for 1 (Resident (R)1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the Maintenance Manager (MM) for a Posey Defined Perimeter Mattress Cover, revised on 09/07/2016, indicated, Wedge-shaped foam sections line the perimeter of the covers and help provide a gentle reminder to those lying in bed of the location of the mattress edges, and help provide a less restrictive environment than side rails. A graph on the document indicated Foam Sections - Height 4 (10 cm [centimeter).Review of R1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted R1 on 03/12/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included but was not limited to diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with early onset, emphysema, generalized muscle weakness, and contracture of the right and left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during an medication administration observation for two of seven resident observations (Resident (R) 13 and R19), during an observation of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for one of three COVID-19 positive residents (R24), and during a dressing change for one of one resident observation (R74) of 24 sample resident. These failures had the potential for spreading infections including COVID 19 to the vulnerable population in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Policies and Procedures - Infection Prevention and Control revealed: Policy Statement. The facility adopted infection prevention and control policies and procedures are intended to help maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections .Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Infection prevention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (R) 18 and R85 of three reviewed for abuse was free from resident to resident physical and verbal abuse out of a total sample of 24 residents. This had the potential for the residents to sustain injuries from the altercation. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, .Abuse and Neglect Management Policy Statement revealed Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. [Facility Name] does not condone any form of abuse and will continually monitor [Facility Name] policies, procedures, training programs, systems, etc. to assist in preventing resident abuse is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, and staff from other agencies providing services to our residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written copy of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or responsible party (RP) within 48 hours for one of one resident (Resident (R) 261) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure had the potential for residents and/or RP not to be informed of the plan of care. Findings include: Review of R261's undated Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy, anoxic brain damage, diabetes mellitus, and chronic pain. Review of R261's Progress Notes located under the Progress Notes tab in the hard copy of the medical record revealed a physician progress note, dated 10/30/24, which stated R261 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated R261 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R261's Acknowledgement of Receipt admission Baseline Care Plan, dated 10/24/24 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for refusal of medications and meals for one (Resident (R)92) and failed to develop and implement a care plan for pressure ulcers for one of 24 sample residents R78. This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care plan needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, dated 2017, revealed . The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: a. Include measurable objectives and timeframes; b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; c. Describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment . 1. Review of R92's undated Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R92…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect an updated advanced directive status for one of one resident (Resident (R)92) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care plan needs. Findings include: Review of R92's undated Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of stroke, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of R92's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS Assessments tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed R92 had short- and long-term memory loss and rarely or never made decisions. Review of R92's Advance Directive located under the Advance Directive tab in the hard chart of the medical record revealed the daughter signed for a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) on [DATE] with the admission paperwork that was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have collaboration of care with the dialysis center for one of one resident (Resident (R)38) reviewed for dialysis. This failure had the potential to put R38 at risk for lack of communication between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings include: Review of R38's undated Face Sheet located under the Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident, end stage renal disease, and chronic kidney disease, stage five. Review of R38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS Assessment tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/18/24 revealed the resident was coded as receiving dialysis services while a resident in the facility. Review of R38's Physician Order located in R38's hard chart of the medical record, under the Orders tab, revealed orders, dated 06/20/23, which revealed R38 had dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure risk and benefits were explained to the resident and/or representative (RP) prior to the use of psychotropic medications and failed to ensure targeted behaviors and side effects were monitored for administered psychotropics for one of five residents (Resident (R)46) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure had the potential for excessive psychotropic administration and for the residents and/or representative not to be able to make an informed decision regarding the use of the psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic/Psychotropic Medication Use, revealed . The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others .The attending physician will identify, evaluate and document, with input from other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately check the insulin pen that was being used to administer insulin to one of one resident (Resident (R)14) administered insulin out of seven residents being observed during the medication administration task. This failure had the potential for bloodborne pathogens to infect residents by using a reusable insulin pen to a resident other than the resident that it had been ordered for. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revealed .The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication . During an observation of medication administration on 11/22/24 at 8:09 AM, the label on R14's Humalog insulin Kwik Pen read, Give 12 units every morning. The paper Medication Administration Record (MAR)located in a notebook on the medication cart for R14 matched the label for Humalog which was compared by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,324 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $9,032 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in SC